The Attributable Mortality of Sepsis for Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-699907/v1

Abstract

Background: Both sepsis and AKI are diseases of major concern in intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to evaluate the excess mortality attributable to sepsis for acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods: A propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective cohort study about sepsis epidemiology in 18 Chinese ICUs (January 2014-August 2015) was performed (registration number: ChiCTR-ECH-13003934). Propensity score model was sequentially conducted to match AKI patients with and without sepsis on day 1, day 2, and day 3-5. The primary outcome was hospital death of AKI patients. Propensity score-matched analyses were conducted to estimate the excess mortality attributable to sepsis for AKI.

Results: A total of 2008 AKI patients (40.9%) were eligible for the study. Of the 1010 AKI patients with sepsis, 619 (61.3%) were matched to 619 AKI patients in whom sepsis did not develop during the screening period of the study. The hospital mortality rate of matched AKI patients with sepsis was 205 of 619 (33.1%) compared with 150 of 619 (24.0%) for their matched AKI controls without sepsis (p = 0.001). The attributable mortality of total sepsis for AKI patients was 9.1% (95% CI 4.8-13.3%). Matched AKI patients with and without sepsis were subgrouped according to the severity of sepsis (sepsis, septic shock). Of the matched patients with sepsis, 328 (53.0%) diagnosed septic shock. The mortality rate showed remarkably higher in matched AKI patients with septic shock (43.9%) than their controls of patients without sepsis (27.7%). The attributable mortality of septic shock for AKI was 16.2% (95% CI 11.3-20.8%, p < 0.001). Further, the attributable mortality of sepsis for AKI was 1.4% (95% CI 4.1-5.9%, p = 0.825), although there was no significant difference of mortality rate observed between matched AKI patients with and without sepsis (21.0% vs. 19.6%).

Conclusions: The attributable hospital mortality of total sepsis for AKI were 9.1%. Septic shock contributes to major excess mortality rate for AKI than sepsis.

Introduction

The rising prevalence and mortality of sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI) are main threats to the survival of critically ill patients worldwide. Both sepsis and AKI are diseases of major concern in intensive care unit (ICU) [13]. In critically ill patients, a variety of factors can cause AKI [4], but sepsis is the most common trigger of AKI [5]. Approximately 40–50% of cases of the development of AKI is associated with sepsis [6]. Septic AKI is distinct from non-septic AKI, with differences in pathogenesis, clinical characteristics and outcomes [79]. Limited understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms has prevented the evolution of effective therapies of sepsis and AKI. The mortality rate of septic AKI is up to 30–60%, depending on severity of illness [6, 10]. Up to now, no study assessed the accurate contribution of sepsis for mortality of AKI patients. It is assumed that whether sepsis develops before, simultaneously or after AKI, it would contribute excess mortality for AKI. Therefore, we conducted the propensity score-matched analysis between AKI patients with and without sepsis to evaluate the attributable mortality of sepsis for AKI patients.

Methods

Study setting and population

This is a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis based on database of a prospective cohort study about sepsis epidemiology sponsored by China Critical Care Sepsis Trial (CCCST) workgroup, which was performed in 18 Chinese trial sites of 16 hospitals between January 1, 2014, and August 31, 2015. The database included adult patients of 4910 who stayed longer than 24 hours in ICU. We screened and included patients who diagnosed AKI in the 4910 patients within 5 days after ICU admission. Then we excluded patients from the AKI patients. The exclusion criteria included (1) operated with nephrectomy or kidney transplantation; (2) acquired insufficient data. A complete list of trial sites is provided in the Supplementary File. The protocol of study was registered on August 3, 2013. The study was approved in all participating ICUs by their Hospital Human Ethics Committee. The chief ethics number was 2013FXHEC-KY2018. The registration number was ChiCTR-ECH-13003934. Informed consent from patients or their next of kin was obtained before patients joined in the study. All enrolled patients adhere to the following management principles: active treatment of primary disease and complications; and the same principles of treatment with antibiotics, nutritional metabolism and organ support.

Clinical endpoint and definitions

The primary endpoint was hospital mortality of AKI patients. The diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock was according to the sepsis 3.0 definition of the American College of Chest Physicians/ Society of Critical Care Medicine criteria [11]. The definitions of AKI and AKI classification were depended on the serum creatinine and urine output criteria proposed by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) [12]. AKI with sepsis is defined as patients who develop AKI and sepsis, whether sepsis develops before, simultaneously or after AKI diagnosis. In this study we focused AKI and sepsis diagnosed in 5 days after ICU admission. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was initiated according to medical necessity of patients and decision of the treating clinician. The baseline creatinine was defined as follows: if at least five values were available the median of all values available from six months to six days prior to enrollment was used. Otherwise, the lowest value in the five days prior to enrollment was used. If no pre-enrollment creatinine was available or the emergency patient's serum creatinine was abnormal at the time of admission, the baseline creatinine was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation assuming that baseline eGFR is 75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 [13].

Data collection

The information collected included demographic characteristics, chronic illnesses, diagnosis, pre-ICU medications and treatment (whether or not used nephrotoxic drugs, nephrotoxic drugs included angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, Amikacin and Amphotericin B), the reason for ICU admission, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) on the day of ICU admission, baseline serum creatinine, creatinine values every 12 hours and hourly urine output on ICU admission and thereafter until transferred out of ICU, use of mechanical ventilation, as well as serum lactate, use of vasoactive drugs, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score every day in the first 7 days after ICU admission. We also collected time of diagnosing sepsis, septic shock and AKI after ICU admission, AKI classification, ICU stay, hospital stay, hospital mortality and 30-day mortality.

Propensity score matching

A propensity score model was constructed for matching AKI patients with and without sepsis (1: 1) at five different time points: day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4 and day 5 after ICU admission (Fig. 1). The propensity score model based on baseline characteristics and clinical covariates was used to adjust the differences in matched patients with and without sepsis, which was constructed depending on logistic regression and including variables of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), chronic illnesses (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, cardiovascular disease, chronic liver disease, cancer, diabetes, hypertension), AKI classification, nonrenal SOFA score, and mechanical ventilation. Nonrenal SOFA score was remarkably correlated linearly with APACHE II and use of vasopressor. AKI patients with sepsis were matched 1:1 with controls of AKI patients without sepsis. Then, the hospital mortality in each matched AKI group was calculated and attributable mortality of total sepsis for AKI was estimated.

Matched AKI patients with sepsis and their controls of AKI patients without sepsis were subgrouped by the severity of sepsis (sepsis, septic shock). The severity of sepsis (sepsis, septic shock) was distinguished according to whether the patients met diagnostic criteria of septic shock on the time of diagnosis. The mortality in each matched subgroup was calculated and attributable mortalities of sepsis and septic shock for AKI were estimated, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median values (25th and 75th percentiles), categorical variables were presented as percentiles. Continuous data between two groups was compared using the Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U tests, and categorical variables used the Chi square test or Fisher’ s exact test. Propensity score model was constructed to match AKI patients with and without sepsis. The caliper width was set to 0.1 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score. Covariate balance before and after matching was examined using standardized differences, with values 0.15 considered as evidence of meaningful differences [14]. Pearson or Spearman correlation test was used to estimate the correlation between two variables. The excess mortality of AKI patients attributable to sepsis was calculated by subtracting the mortality of matched AKI patients without sepsis from the mortality of matched AKI patients with sepsis. 95% confidence interval (CI) for the attributable mortality difference was calculated by Newcombe’s method [15]. The McNemar's test was used for sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of outcomes [14]. For all analyses, statistical significance was indicated by two-sided p < 0.05. SPSS statistics 22 (IBM, Chicago, IL) and R 2.1.2 were used for statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 4910 adult critically ill patients were screened. Of them, 2045 developed AKI within 5 days after ICU admission. After excluding 37 ineligible patients, there were 2008 AKI patients finally included in this study. The characteristics of included patients are performed in Table 1. The study flow diagram (Fig. 1) illustrates the ICU treatment day on which sepsis was diagnosed and the sequential matching procedure. Supplemental Table 2 shows the characteristics of matched AKI patients with sepsis and their controls without sepsis in five separate time points.

Table 1

Characteristics of the whole cohort AKI

Variables

Total AKI

(n = 2008)

Demographics

 

Age, years

66 (52, 78)

Male gender

1369 (64.3)

BMI, kg/m2

19.1 (17.5, 21.1)

Comorbidities

 

COPD/asthma

129 (6.4)

Cardiovascular disease

395 (19.7)

Chronic liver disease

60 (2.8)

Cancer

188 (9.4)

Diabetes

416 (20.7)

Hypertension

788 (39.2)

CKD

218 (10.8)

Sepsis

1007 (50.1)

Admission type

 

Medical

825 (41.1)

Surgical

446 (22.2)

Emergency

737 (36.7)

APACHE II score

19 (13, 25)

AKI stage 2–3

815 (40.6)

Nonrenal SOFA

5 (3, 8)

Use of nephrotoxic drugs

171 (8.5)

Mechanical ventilation

1476 (73.5)

Use of vasopressor

976 (48.6)

Outcomes

 

Use of RRT

601 (29.9)

ICU stay (days)

7 (4, 14)

Hospital stay (days)

17 (10, 26)

ICU mortality

534 (26.6)

30-day mortality

549 (27.3)

Hospital mortality

646 (32.2)

Values are median (interquartile range) or n (%), BMI body mass index,
APACHE II acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, SOFA sequential
organ failure assessment, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
CKD chronic kidney disease, ICU intensive care unit, RRT renal replacement therapy

Of the 1010 AKI patients with sepsis, 619 (61.3%) were matched to 619 AKI patients in whom sepsis did not develop during the screening period of the study (Fig. 1). The distributions of propensity score before and after matching in cohorts with and without sepsis are shown in Fig. 2. Patient characteristics of the matched pairs are presented in Table 2. After matching, the groups were balanced regarding the matched variables with small standardized differences (Table 2). RRT was used in 167 (27.0%) and 160 (25.8%) patients in matched AKI patients with and without sepsis, respectively (p = 0.699). The length of ICU and hospital stay was 8.0 days (4.0-15.5 d), 17.0 days (11.0–25.0 d) for AKI patients with sepsis and 6.0 days (4.0–11.0 d), 18.0 days (10.0–28.0 d) for the non-sepsis AKI control patients, respectively (p = 0.001, p = 0.158). The hospital mortality rate of matched AKI patients with sepsis was 205 of 619 (33.1%) compared with 150 of 619 (24.0%) for their matched AKI controls without sepsis (p = 0.001). The attributable mortality of total sepsis for AKI patients was 9.1% (95% CI 4.8–13.3%). The attributable mortalities of total sepsis and different severity of sepsis (sepsis and septic shock) for AKI are shown in Fig. 3.

Table 2

A comparison of characteristics between matched AKI patients with and without sepsis

Variables

Matched AKI with sepsis

(n = 619)

Matched AKI

without sepsis

(n = 619)

p value

0.409

Standardized Difference

Age, years

67 (53, 79)

66 (52, 78)

0.480

-0.042

Male gender

400 (64.6)

385 (62.2)

0.585

0.040

BMI, kg/m2

19.1 (17.6, 21.1)

19.4 (17.4, 21.1)

0.888

0.033

COPD/asthma

44 (7.1)

33 (5.3)

0.239

-0.024

Cardiovascular disease

136 (22.0)

117 (18.9)

0.204

-0.003

Chronic liver disease

13 (2.1)

14 (2.3)

1.000

-0.016

Cancer

48 (7.8)

59 (9.5)

0.312

-0.004

Diabetes

154 (24.9)

138 (22.3)

0.315

-0.051

Hypertension

261 (42.2)

259 (41.8)

0.954

0.005

CKD

69 (11.1)

65 (10.5)

0.784

0.068

AKI stage 2–3

331 (53.5)

305 (49.3)

0.629

0.052

Nonrenal SOFA on matched day

5 (3, 8)

5 (3, 8)

0.528

0.079

Mechanical ventilation

444 (71.7)

454 (73.3)

0.567

-0.035

Values are median (interquartile range) or n (%), BMI body mass index, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CKD chronic kidney disease, AKI acute kidney injury, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment

Matched AKI patients with and without sepsis were subgrouped according to the severity of sepsis (sepsis, septic shock). Of the matched patients with sepsis, 328 (53.0%) diagnosed septic shock. The mortality rate showed remarkably higher in matched AKI patients with septic shock (43.9%) than their controls of patients without sepsis (27.7%). The attributable mortality of septic shock for AKI was 16.2% (95% CI 11.3–20.8%, p < 0.001). Further, the attributable mortality of sepsis for AKI was 1.4% (95% CI -4.1-5.9%, p = 0.825), although there was no significant difference of mortality rate observed between matched AKI patients with and without sepsis (21.0% vs. 19.6%).

Discussion

Sepsis and AKI are inextricably common diseases in critically ill patients. Sepsis is a leading cause of AKI, and AKI is a frequent complication of sepsis [4, 5]. Many researches’ results convincingly showed the “intimate” bond between sepsis and AKI in ICU patients. For instance, AKI in up to half of septic patients was reported in the BEST Kidney and FINNAKI studies [6, 16]. Study by Vaara ST, et al [17] estimated the attributable mortality of AKI. Kelly F, et al [18] examined long-term mortality in sepsis patients compared to hospitalized non-sepsis controls. However, none of studies accurately calculated the attributable mortality of sepsis for AKI. For this purpose, this sequentially propensity-matched analysis calculated the attributable mortality of sepsis for AKI. The main findings show that the estimated excess hospital mortality statistically attributable to sepsis for AKI was 9.1 percentage points (95% CI 4.8–13.3% percentage points). Septic shock contributed to major excess mortality for AKI than sepsis. The findings further strengthen the role of sepsis as a significant leading cause for mortality of AKI.

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Abundant releases of inflammatory cytokines and leukocyte activation may result in capillary plugging and micro-thrombi, as well as production of reactive oxygen species and induction of nitric oxide synthase, which further destroy the endothelial barrier and the glycocalyx leading to organ edema and systemic hypovolemia [1921]. Overall, pathogenesis of sepsis includes macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, immunologic and autonomic dysregulation, septic AKI may occur in the absence of renal hypoperfusion and hemodynamic derangement and even in the presence of normal or increased global renal blood flow [2225]. It is different from the major causes of non-septic AKI which are renal hypoperfusion and associated ischemia in the critically ill patients [7, 26, 27]. This study shows sepsis increase excess mortality compared to non-septic pathogenic factors such as trauma and cardiac insufficiency, etc in matched clinical conditions.

Sepsis may have specific prognostic implications when it compared with other AKI causes. Study by Signe Søvik, et al [28] showed an overall mortality of 27% in post-traumatic AKI was comparable with what had been observed in a general ICU population. And some studies in patients developing AKI after cardiac surgery showed short-term mortality of cardiac surgery-associated AKI (CSA-AKI) was reported between 15–30% [29]. Clinical and prognostic relevance of AKI in the setting of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) was evaluated by study of Marenzi G, et al [30]. Ninety-seven consecutive STEMI patients with CS were included and 52 (55%) patients developed AKI. Patients developing AKI had a high mortality rate of 50 percentage points. In the BEST Kidney trial analysis [16], septic AKI were 50% higher of the odds of dying in hospital in compared with non-septic AKI. Visibly, the composition of the non-septic group and its proportion of conditions with poor prognosis (such as CS) greatly influence the different prognosis between septic and non-septic AKI.

The various mortalities of septic AKI were reported in different studies. Our study showed a hospital mortality of 33.1% in matched AKI patients with sepsis compared with 24.0% of their matched AKI controls without sepsis. Angus et al. examined 192,980 patients with severe sepsis from seven US states [31]. They found AKI occurred in 22% and was associated with a mortality of 38.2%. The SOAP cohort study recruited 3147 patients [32]. Of them, AKI occurred in 51% of sepsis cases and was related to an ICU mortality of 41%. Different from studies above, this study highlights the attributable mortality of sepsis for AKI, and a close link was observed between increased mortality and sepsis severity. There are a lot of studies focused on septic AKI, we should also be concerned for the AKI patients who developed sepsis after AKI. Whether sepsis developed before, simultaneously or after AKI, it would deteriorate organ function and contribute excess mortality for AKI. Furthermore, septic shock contributed to major excess mortality for AKI than sepsis. The seriousness of this condition emphasized the need for prompt and appropriate intervention. Prevention of sepsis development and progress to septic shock may represent a potential key therapeutic target for AKI and decrease mortality.

This study still has some limitations. The database was prospectively collected and detailed clinical data allowed us to construct careful sequential matching. However, the study was analyzed retrospective, which may make some hidden biases. Secondly, we studied AKI and sepsis in the first 5 days after ICU admission, there were still a minority of patients develop AKI and/or sepsis after 5 days, this may slightly affact the results of excess mortality attributable to sepsis for AKI patients. Nevertheless, development of AKI and sepsis after day 5 is uncommon [17]. Furthermore, the majority of AKI and sepsis were diagnosed in the first 2 days in this study.

Conclusion

The attributable hospital mortality of total sepsis for AKI were 9.1% (95% CI 4.8–13.3%). Septic shock contributes to more excess mortality rate for AKI than sepsis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the 18 trial sites of 16 hospitals in the China Critical Care Sepsis Trial (CCCST) workgroup, including Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China; Department of Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Geriatric Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China; Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, ZhongShan Hospital, FuDan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing China; Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. In addition, we especially thank Professor Xiaoxia Peng in Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Centre for Children Health for technical support in applying for the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and/or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Funding

This study is a part of a project supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (2012BAI11B05).

Authors’ contributions

HMJ, YJJ, XZ, and XMX contributed to data interpretation, statistical analysis, drafting of the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript. MPW, WL contributed to data collection and data interpretation. WXL conceived and designed the study, performed critical revision of the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved in all participating ICUs by their Hospital Human Ethics Committee. The chief ethics number was 2013FXHEC-KY2018. Informed consent from patients or their next of kin was obtained before patients joined in the study.

Consent for publication

The manuscript has been read and its submission approved by all co-authors.

References

  1. Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R. the ANZICS Database Management Committee. Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation. Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R47.
  2. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mikolajetz A, Schwarzkopf D, Cohen J, Hartog CS, Pletz M, et al. Challenges in assessing the burden of sepsis and understanding the inequalities of sepsis outcomes between National Health Systems: secular trends in sepsis and infection incidence and mortality in Germany. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(11):1826–35.
  3. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1949–64.
  4. Case J, Khan S, Khalid R, Khan A. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:479730.
  5. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C, Wald R, Martensson J, Maiden M, et al. Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(6):816–28.
  6. Poukkanen M, Vaara ST, Pettilä V, Kaukonen KM, Korhonen AM, Hovilehto S, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis in Finnish Intensive Care Units. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(7):863–72.
  7. Gomez H, Ince C, Backer DD, Pickkers P, Payen D, Hotchkiss J, et al. A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock. 2014;41(1):3–11.
  8. Mehta RL, Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Ikizler TA, Paganini EP, Chertow GM, et al. Sepsis as a cause and consequence of acute kidney injury: program to improve care in acute renal disease. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(2):241–8.
  9. Peters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, Nanchal R, François B, Sakr Y, et al. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):188.
  10. Mårtensson J, Bellomo R. Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Crit Care Clin. 2015;31(4):649–60.
  11. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.
  12. Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, Chawla LS, Parikh CR, Thakar CV, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):649–72.
  13. Kashani K, Al-Khafaji A, Ardiles T, Artigas A, Bagshaw SM, Bell M, et al. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013;17(1):R25.
  14. Jaehoon Lee, Todd D, Little. A practical guide to propensity score analysis for applied clinical research. Behav Res Ther. 2017;98:76–90.
  15. Newcombe RG. Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Stat Med. 1998;17(22):2635–50.
  16. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, et al. Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(3):431–39.
  17. Vaara ST, Pettilä V, Kaukonen KM, Bendel S, Korhonen AM, Bellomo E, et al. The attributable mortality of acute kidney injury: a sequentially matched analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(4):878–85.
  18. Kelly F, Lauralyn M, Christopher JD, Talarico R, Taljaard M, Krahn M, et al. Sepsis-associated mortality, resource use, and healthcare costs: a propensity-matched cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(2):215–27.
  19. Chelazzi C, Villa G, Mancinelli P, De Gaudio AR, Adembri C. Glycocalyx and sepsis-induced alterations in vascular permeability. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):26.
  20. Tsukahara Y, Morisaki T, Kojima M, Uchiyama A, Tanaka M. iNOS expression by activated neutrophils from patients with sepsis. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71(1):15–20.
  21. Guerci P, Ergin B, Ince C. The macro- and microcirculation of the kidney. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;31(3):315–29.
  22. Langenberg C, Wan L, Egi M, May CN, Bellomo R. Renal blood flow in experimental septic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2006;69(11):1996–2002.
  23. Prowle JR, Molan MP, Hornsey E, Bellomo R. Measurement of renal blood flow by phase- contrast magnetic resonance imaging during septic acute kidney injury: a pilot investigation. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(6):1768–76.
  24. Murugan R, Karajala-Subramanyam V, Lee M, Yende S, Kong L, Carter M, et al. Acute kidney injury in non-severe pneumonia is associated with an increased immune response and lower survival. Kidney Int. 2010;77(6):527–35.
  25. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C, Wald R, Martensson J, Maiden M, et al. Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(6):816–28.
  26. Honore PM, Jacobs R, Joannes-Boyau O, Regt JD, Boer W, Waele ED, et al. Septic AKI in ICU patients. Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment type, dosing, and timing: a comprehensive review of recent and future developments. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):32.
  27. Gül F, Arslantaş MK, Cinel İ, Kumar A. Changing definitions of sepsis. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017;45(3):129–38.
  28. Søvik S, Isachsen MS, Nordhuus KM, Tveiten CK, Eken T, Sunde K, et al. Acute kidney injury in trauma patients admitted to the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive care Med. 2019;45(4):407–19.
  29. Xu JR, Jiang WH, Shen B, Fang Y, Teng J, Wang YN, et al. Acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery. Contrib Nephrol. 2018;193:127–36.
  30. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Campodonico J, Metrio MD, Lauri G, Marana I, et al. Acute kidney injury in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock at admission. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2):438–44.
  31. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1303–10.
  32. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):344–53.