Menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Adolescent girls face several challenges relating to menstruation and its proper management. Lack of adequate sanitary products, inadequate water supply, and privacy for changing sanitary pads continue to leave adolescent girls with limited options for safe and proper menstrual hygiene in many low-income settings, including Ethiopia. These situations are also compounded by societal myths, stigmas surrounding menstruation, and discriminatory social norms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled proportion of safe menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in Ethiopia using the available studies. Methods We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, African Journal Online (AJOL), Hinari, Science Direct, ProQuest, Direct of Open Access Journals, POPLINE, and Cochrane Library database inception to May 31, 2021. Studies reporting the proportion of menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in Ethiopia were considered. The Cochrane Q test statistics and I2 tests were used to assess the heterogeneity of the included studies. Since the included studies revealed considerable heterogeneity, a random effect meta-analysis model was used to estimate the pooled proportion of menstrual hygiene management (MHM). Results Of 1,045 identified articles, 22 studies were eligible for analysis (n = 12,330 participants). The pooled proportion (PP) of safe MHM in Ethiopia was 52.69% (95%CI: 44.16, 61.22). The use of commercial menstrual absorbents was common 64.63% (95%CI: 55.32, 73.93, I2 99.2%) followed by homemade cloth 53.03% (95%CI: 22.29, 83.77, I2 99.2%). Disposal of absorbent material into the latrine was the most common practice in Ethiopia 62.18% (95%CI: 52.87, 71.49, I2 98.7%). One in four girls reported missing one or more school days during menstruation (PP: 32.03%, 95%CI: 22.65%, 41.40%, I2 98.2%). Conclusion This study revealed that only half of the adolescent girls in Ethiopia had safe MHM practices. To ensure that girls in Ethiopia can manage menstruation hygienically and with dignity, strong gender-specific water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities along with strong awareness creation activities at every level are needed.

Introduction infections (RTI) [15][16][17]. It is suggested that, during menstruation, girls need to change their sanitary absorbent regularly and menstrual absorbent materials should be changed three or four times a day, and girls need to wash their genital area at least twice a day with soap and water [10,18].
In Ethiopia, most school adolescents practiced unsafe menstrual hygiene during menstruation [7,[19][20][21], and only 1 in every 4 girls knew about menstruation before their first period [22]. Moreover, studies from Ethiopia revealed that 30.9% of adolescent girls use old closes for menstrual absorbent [23], 62.5% washed their genitalia using water only [24], 65.3% disposed absorbent material in open filled [12], and the proportion of adolescent girls practicing safe menstrual hygiene management inconstant throughout the country: 35.4% in Northeast Ethiopia [7], 29.8% in Northwest Ethiopia [25], 55.8% in Eastern Ethiopia [26], and 70.2% in Central Ethiopia [12]. Furthermore, adolescent girls in Ethiopia face additional burdens and challenges as a result of poor school water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) conditions (barriers include a lack of access to sanitation products and facilities, schools' lack of access to consistent supplies of water, and restrooms that are not MHM friendly), gender-based violence, and the stigmatization of menstruation [3,27]. As a result, schoolgirls reported frequent episodes of low school attendance and absenteeism ranging from 19.2 to 54.5 percent [7,27].
Several studies have been conducted across Ethiopia, examining the status of MHM among adolescent schoolgirls [7,12,13,19,[23][24][25][26]. However, there was no nationwide study assessing the pooled proportion of safe MHM among adolescent girls. Further, the findings of these studies were inconsistent and characterized by significant variability. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to estimate: (1), the pooled proportion of safe MHM, and (2) the pooled estimate for the type of absorbent used by adolescent girls, disposal practice of absorbents, hygiene during menstruation, bathing during menstruation, and school absenteeism were measured using available studies. The findings of this study would be useful to policymakers and program planners in the design of appropriate interventions to improve safe MHM in the country and similar settings.

Study design
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the pooled proportion of safe MHM practice and its associated factors among adolescent girls in Ethiopia. This review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the guideline of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [28] (S1 File). The protocol for this review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), the University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (record ID: CRD42021261351, 18 th July, 2021)

Study selection and data extraction
Two investigators (BS and DA) independently screened identified articles by their title, abstract, and full text to identify eligible articles against predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The screened articles were compiled together from the two investigators (BS and DA) and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We extracted data on study characteristics (such as study area, year of study, participants, age, sample size, response rate, and proportion of MHM). Endnote reference manager software was utilized to collect and organize search outcomes and for the removal of duplicate articles.

Outcome measurement
The primary outcome of this study was safe menstrual hygiene practice. Adolescent girls using a clean menstrual management material to absorb or collect blood that can be changed in privacy as often as necessary for the duration of the menstruation period. The use of soap and water for washing the body as required and having access to facilities to dispose of used menstrual management materials termed as safe practice. We included studies that fulfilled the above definition. However, we found studies that used related definitions for safe menstrual hygiene practice. For this reason, we carefully checked the operational definition used by each included study and describe it in a table along with its proportion. In addition, the following outcomes were also examined: type of menstrual absorbent used by adolescent girls, disposal practice of used menstrual absorbents, daily bathing during menstruation, school absenteeism during menstruation, and change frequency of menstrual absorbent material.

Operational definition
Safe menstrual hygiene management practice. Adolescent girls using a clean menstrual management material to absorb or collect blood that can be changed in privacy as often as necessary for the duration of the menstruation period, using soap and water for washing the body as required and having access to facilities to dispose of used menstrual management materials.
Menstrual absorbents. Refer to any product used by adolescent girls to collect menstrual flow; commercial pads refer to those marketed and available for purchase in shops.

Quality assessment of the studies
The qualities of the included studies were assessed, and the risks for biases were refereed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality assessment tool for the prevalence studies [29]. Two reviewers (BS and DA) assess the quality of included studies independently. The assessment tool consists of nine parameters: (1) appropriate sampling frame, (2) proper sampling technique, (3) adequate sample size, (4) study subject and setting description, (5) sufficient data analysis, (6) use of valid methods for the identified conditions, (7) valid measurement for all participants, (8) using appropriate statistical analysis, and (9) adequate response rate. Failure to satisfy each parameter was scored as 1 if not 0. When the information provided was not adequate to assist in making a judgment for a specific item, we agreed to grade that item as 1 (failure to satisfy a specific item). The risks for biases were classified as either low (total score, 0 to 2), moderate (total score, 3 or 4), or high (total score, 5 to 9). Finally, articles with low and moderate quality were considered in this review (S3 File).

Statistical methods and analysis
The extracted data were imported into STATA version 14 software for statistical analysis. The heterogeneity among all included studies was assessed by I 2 statistics and the Cochran Q test.
The tests indicate significant heterogeneity among included studies (I 2 = 91.6, Pvalue < 0.001). Thus, a random-effects meta-analysis model was computed using the DerSimonian and Laird Method [30]. The overall pooled estimate was computed using the metaprop STATA command. The standard errors were calculated from the reported estimates and population denominators using a binominal distribution assumption. Accordingly, the pooled proportion of MHM and their corresponding 95% CI were presented using forest plots and tables. We performed a subgroup analysis based on geographical regions of the country, sample size, sampling methods, and publication year. Further, statistical analyses such as metaregression and sensitivity analysis were performed to identify the possible sources of heterogeneity.

Publication bias
In this meta-analysis, the presence of publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Begg's tests at a significance level of less than 0.05.

Sensitivity analysis
Sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model was performed to assess the influence of a single study on the overall pooled estimate.

Characteristics of included studies
As described in Table 1, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. All the included studies were cross-sectional studies by design. A total of 12,330 adolescent girls  participated in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. The median response rate of the included studies was 98.35%. The included twenty-two studies were published from 2004 to 2021. In the current meta-analysis, the sample size varied from small (n = 274) [34] to large (n = 1,065) [27]. From the reports of primary studies, the mean age of the respondents ranged from 14.9 ±1.3 [24] to 17.7±1.5 [40] years. In this review, the lowest proportion (24.5%) of safe MHM was found in a study conducted at the Bahir Dar, Amhara region [33], while the highest proportion (90.8%) of safe MHM was reported in a study conducted at Mahelmeda, Amhara region [38]. These 22 studies were conducted in four Ethiopian regions and one administrative town (Addis Ababa). Ten studies were conducted in Oromia [12,13,19,20,23,32,34,35,37,39], seven in Amhara region [7,25,33,36,38,40,41], three in Addis Ababa [24,27,31], one in SNNPR (South Nations and Nationalities People of the Region) [21] and one Harari regions [26]. No studies were reported from Tigray, Benishangul Gumiz, Afar, Somali, Gagmbela regions, and Dire Dawa city administrations. Concerning the quality score of included studies, most articles (77.3%) had low-quality scores ( Table 1 and S3 File). In addition, 18 studies [7, 12, 13, 19-21, 23-26, 32, 33, 35-38, 40, 41] performed multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with MHM in Ethiopia ( Table 2).

Meta-analysis of pooled safe MHM in Ethiopia
The overall pooled proportion of safe MHM in Ethiopia was found to be 52.69% (95%CI: 44.16, 61.22) (Fig 2). The included studies exhibited significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 99.1%, p < 0.001), which led us to compute a random effect meta-analysis model to estimate the pooled proportion of safe MHM in Ethiopia.
In this meta-analysis, we performed subgroup analysis based on the studies' geographical setting (Region of the country). Accordingly, the highest proportion of safe MHM was observed in Harari region with proportion of 55.8% (95% CI: 50 (Fig 3). Concerning sample size, the proportion of safe MHM was higher in studies having a sample size � 400 adolescent girls, 59.53% (95% CI: 51.04, 68.02%) compared to those having a sample size > 400 adolescent girls, 50.69% (95% CI: 40.47, 60.92%) ( Table 3). PLOS ONE Table 2. Summarized description of studies on factors associated with menstrual hygiene management.

MHM (%) Identified factors associated with MHM
Birhane AD et al., 2020 [35] Oromia A school-based cross-sectional In the current study, when an adolescent girl during menstruation changes menstrual pad and washes perinea area at least three times per day, it is considered as "ideal" practice, if the practice is done twice per day it is considered as "good" practice otherwise it is considered as "fair" practice. However, if an adolescent girl does not change sanitary pads and wash the perineal area within a day, she is considered as not practicing menstrual hygiene.

45.6
Students whose mothers can read write were more than 4 fold likely to practice menstrual hygiene ( Oromia A school-based cross-sectional study A composite score was used, and the detailed description of the outcome definition was not clearly described.

55.8
The students who live in the rural area (AOR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.58) were 73% less likely to have good menstrual hygiene practice than students who live in the urban, students who have no permanent pocket money from family (AOR = 0. 36 Oromia A school-based cross-sectional study A composite score was used and items used to assess hygiene practice includes: Use of absorbent materials during menstruation; Use of commercial disposable sanitary pads; Changes pads or clothes more than three times a day during menstruation; Cleans reusable clothes with soap and water; Dry reusable clothes in the sunlight; Disposes pads by wrapping with paper; Takes bath daily with soap during menstruation; Cleans external genitalia during menstruation, and Cleans external genitalia with water and soap during menstruation.

58.3
Girls from urban areas were 2.59 times more likely to have good menstrual hygiene management practices compared to their counterparts (AOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.77-3.80). Girls whose mother's educational status was secondary school and above were about 2 times more likely to have good menstrual hygiene management practices compared to those whose mothers had no formal education (AOR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.01-3.30). The likelihood of practicing good menstrual hygiene management was 2.78 times higher among those students who had moderate knowledge (AOR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.64-5.28) and 3.87 times more likely among those who had good knowledge (AOR = 3.87, 95% CI: 2.21-6.77) compared to those who had poor knowledge

Disposes of used sanitary pads in dustbins
Biruk E, 2017 [24] Oromia A school-based cross-sectional study Adolescent school girls using a clean menstrual management material to absorb or collect blood that can be changed in privacy as often as necessary for the duration of the menstruation period, using soap and water for washing the body as required, and having access to facilities to dispose of used menstrual management materials Amhara A school-based cross-sectional study The measurement of the practice of menstrual hygiene focuses on the use of material during menstruation, methods of disposal of materials (use of sanitary pad), cleaning of external genitalia (cleaning 2 or more times/day), frequency of sanitary pad change (changing pad 2 or more times/day) and materials used for cleaning purpose (washing with soap and water or with plain water).

90.9
It revealed that the practice of good menstrual hygiene was more among students who live in the urban (AOR 2.38: 95% CI, 1.14, 3.05) than those students who live in the rural area, whose source of information was a teacher (AOR 7.64: 95% CI, 2.16, 27.03) than students whose source of information was mother, who have access for water (AOR 6.504: 95% CI, 2.08, 20.32) were more practiced good menstrual hygiene than those who didn't have access for water, who had a high level of knowledge about menstrual hygiene (AOR 5 Oromia School-based crosssectional study Adolescent girls using a clean menstrual management material to absorb or collect blood that can be changed in privacy as often as necessary for the duration of the menstruation period, using soap and water for washing the body as required, and having access to facilities to dispose of used menstrual management materials.

37.4
The current study identified that students who were from the urban residence Oromia School-based crosssectional study A composite score was used and items used to assess hygiene practice includes Use of absorbent materials during menstruation; type of material used; place of disposal; use of clean cloths, soap, and water; clean external genitalia; use of soap and water for bathing; and frequency of changing absorbents.

57
Students who don't felt the school was comfortable 44% less likely to had good menstrual hygiene practice than students who felt school was comfortable (AOR = 0.56; 95%CI = 0.37-0.85). Furthermore, students whose source of money was their parents were 2.3 times more likely to had a good menstrual hygiene practice as compared to those students who earn the money by themselves (AOR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.07, 4.77). Regarding mother's educational status, students whose mother attended secondary and above level of education were 39% less likely to had good menstrual hygiene practice than students whose mother attended below and primary level of education (AOR = 0.61; 95%CI = 0.37-0.99).
Upashe SP et al., 2015 [20] Oromia School-based crosssectional study A composite score was used and items used to assess hygiene practice includes: Uses absorbent materials during menstruation; use of clean clothes with soap and water; Changing pads or clothes more than three times and above during menstruation; Takes bath daily with soap during menstruation; Cleans external genitalia with water and soap during menstruation, and Disposes used sanitary pads in a dustbin 39.9 Girls whose mother's educational status was secondary school and above were 2 times more likely to have good practice of menstrual hygiene than their counterparts [AOR = 2.03, 95% CI:

School absenteeism during menstruation
In the current study, seven studies (7,12,13,23,27,31,33) reported on school absenteeism associated with menstruation, with one in four girls missing one or more school days during menstruation

Sensitivity analyses
To detect the influence of one study on the overall meta-analysis estimate, sensitivity analysis using a random-effects model was used, and there is no evidence for the influence of a single study on the overall pooled result of safe MHM in Ethiopia (Fig 4 and S4 File).

Meta-regression
We conducted a univariate meta-regression model by considering publication year, sample size, and quality score as covariates to identify the possible sources of heterogeneity across

PLOS ONE
primary studies, but none of these variables was found to be a statistically significant source of heterogeneity ( Table 5). The results of meta-regression analysis also showed no significant relationship between safe MHM and sampled size (p = 0.853) (Fig 5) or over time (p = 0.952) (Fig 6).

Publication bias
In this meta-analysis, possible publication bias was also visualized through funnel plots and using Begg's test. Asymmetrical large inverted funnel resembled the absence of publication biases (Fig 7). Also, the probability of publication biases was tested using Egger's weighted regression and Begg's rank correlation test. In the current review, Begg's and Egger's tests were

Evidence from the reviewed studies
As shown in Table 2, the most consistent factors associated with safe MHM in Ethiopia included (i) socio-demographic and economic factors such as maternal and paternal educational and occupational status, place of residence, monthly income, and access to media sources like television (ii) adolescent girls characteristics such as age, school grade, and earning pocket money, and receive advice on menstruation (iii) access to WASH facilities, (iv) awareness/ information about menstruation before menarche and knowledge about menstruation. The review showed that higher socioeconomic status [7], higher maternal education [20,24,33,36,37], higher paternal education [13], maternal employment [20], access to water facility [12,38,41], access to toilet facility [12,19], adolescent girls who earn pocket money from their families [20,26,32], and girls who reported that they used media (electronic/books) as common source of information about menses [13], and schoolgirls with good knowledge about menstruation [19,21,24,25,[36][37][38]40] were associated with higher odds of safe MHM. Each circle demonstrates one selected study, and the size of each circle corresponds to the weight assigned to each study. The slope of the regression line indicates an increase or decrease of the study effect using REML estimation. Given the slope of the regression line is descending in this figure, it can be inferred that as the studies' publication year has been increased, the proportion of safe MHM has been decreased. However, this association was not statistically significant (p = 0.952). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262295.g005

Discussion
Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) is vital to the empowerment of adolescent school girls. It is about more than just access to low-cost sanitary menstrual pads and suitable toiletsthough those are imperative. It is also about ensuring girls live in an environment that values and supports their ability to manage their menstruation with dignity [22]. Poor MHM not only puts girls at risk of infection, but it would affect girl's education, confidence, and selfesteem in a major way. In Ethiopia, as in many developing countries, menstrual hygiene management among adolescent school girls remains poorly discussed so far. The current comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses have dealt with the proportion of safe MHM and its associated factors in Ethiopia.
The review has included 22 primary studies investigating MHM among adolescent girls. The review founds that only half of the adolescent girls in Ethiopia had safe MHM practice, a significant number of girls use homemade cloth or disposable piece of rags (53.03%) for their MHM, inappropriate disposal was common (62.2%), and one in four girls missing one or more school days during menstruation (32.03%). We also found that adolescent girls who live in an urban area, those who earn pocket money from their parents and have good knowledge on menstrual hygiene were positively associated with safe MHM.
The current meta-analysis showed that almost one in two adolescent girls had safe MHM in Ethiopia, and 64.6% use commercial menstrual absorbents. These findings were higher than a systematic review conducted by van Eijk et al. in India [5], which reported 45% of girls-only If there is no publication bias, it is expected that this line passes from origin to a point near the origin. Since intercept (width from origin) is close to 0 in this figure, we conclude that there is no publication bias. Because zero is included in the confidence interval. Therefore, it could be concluded that the publication bias is not significant.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262295.g008 use commercial menstrual absorbents. Although it is favorable to use commercial sanitary pads, use of commercial absorbents varies across Ethiopian regions 87.6% (in Addis Ababa, the capital city) to SNNP region 42.4%. Different studies also reported variation across urban and rural dwellers, particularly in rural areas low commercial menstrual absorbent was frequently reported in Asia [5,42] and African countries [43,44]. As the current cost of sanitary pads is too high for many girls, they remain dependent on reusable cloth pads that they wash and reuse [45,46]. For instance, one study from rural Kenya showed that two-thirds of girls and young women aged 13-29 using sanitary pads reported receiving them from sexual partners. There was a higher likelihood of receiving pads if respondents had more than one sexual partner, placing girls at increased risk of HIV or unwanted pregnancy. The prevalence of sex for money to purchase pads was concentrated among 15-year-old girls, with a six-fold higher likelihood of engaging in this practice than older respondents [47]. As cloths are traditionally used to absorb menstrual flow, and they are cheaper, a significant number of adolescent girls use homemade close and disposal rage to absorb menstrual flows in this review, which was comparable to studies conducted elsewhere [45,48]. In this review, low use of tissue paper was reported as absorbents by girls, which is much lower than a study report from Uganda, 37.1% [46].
The disposal of menstrual absorbents, particularly commercial pads, is of great concern because of their high content of non-biodegradable components [5]. As the conventional sanitary pads available in the market are loaded with plastics, sanitary products usually made out of plastic take over 500 years to fully degrade [42]. In India, every year, about 12.3 billion sanitary napkins, the majority of which are not biodegradable or compostable, were disposed of, and 23 percent throw the waste in open spaces like drains, rivers, wells, lakes, and roadside [49]. In this review, remarkably two-third (62.2%) of used menstrual absorbents end up in the latrine, and the practice was comparable in all regions of Ethiopia. In addition, 15.8% of girls threw the absorbent in an open field. In Ethiopia, the safe disposal of menstrual absorbents has become a growing problem across Ethiopian regions. However, the problem receives little attention. There is also no standardized method for disposing of such pads; in most cases, they are thrown with regular waste, thrown in the open, buried, or burned openly. Our pooled estimate of burying (6.6%) and burning (11.8%) of the used pad was lower than that in a systematic review report from India, where 25% and 17% of adolescent girls across India reported they either burying or burning used menstrual absorbents, respectively [5].
In the current review, 50.7% of schoolgirls reported they used both soap and water for genital cleaning, and 45.8% reported washing their genitalia using water only. In Ethiopia, nearly 39 million people in rural areas do not have access to a safe water supply. As the majority of them were adolescent girls, maintaining the use of clean water and soap for genital cleaning for girls remains a significant problem. Furthermore, the WASH infrastructure in schools in Ethiopia is currently in a very poor state, with over half of girls (56%) reporting there is never access to water in schools and over three quarters (77%) of communal and school toilets observed had faecal matter present in the facilities [50]. Because of these and many cultural problems, adolescent girls face a major barrier to ensuring appropriate MHM, which puts them at risk of infection. It was pointed that the cleanliness of the genital area and access to safe menstrual hygiene products can reduce the incidents of infection up to 97%. Changing sanitary napkins every 4 hours and washing hands whenever sanitary napkins are changed is a significant step towards ensuring good hygiene during periods [51]. A study by Das et al. found that washing (bath or vaginal wash) with water only as compared with water and soap during menstruation was associated with symptomatic cases of urogenital infection (OR: 2.4, 95% CI:1.01-5.7, p = 0.045) [16].
The poor state of MHM significantly disrupts the academic achievement of adolescent girls. In this review, one in four girls missed school one or more school days during menstruation. Similarly, girls from resource-poor countries worldwide attribute frequent school absences to difficulties managing their menses [4,5,7,31,52]. For instance, nearly two-thirds of adolescent girls miss school in Uganda at least once per month because of menstruation [46]. In many cases, school absenteeism appears to be closely associated with lack of privacy, genderspecific WASH facilities, and limited availability of water and sanitation facilities at schools [4,52,53]. Moreover, during menstruation and fear of sudden menstrual blood leakage, as many girls in developing countries did not use proper sanitary napkins, they were also the contributing factor for students' dropout, and a key reason for attending class attentively possibly leads to school absenteeism [4,8]. For this reason, a gender-specific and gender-sensitive school environment that supports adolescent girl's menstrual hygiene rights is important for school girls to engage in class and stay in school.

Limitations
This review has several limitations. First, all included studies were cross-sectional, so causality cannot be inferred. Second, because the included studies used self-administered questionnaires or interviews, social desirability bias was likely. Third, many of the included studies use different definitions for good MHM, despite the fact that they have commonly included items. For this reason, we carefully extract each outcome definition from the included studies along with their prevalence. Fourth, there was high heterogeneity between included studies as indicated by the I 2 statistic, which was frequently over 90%. This may be explained by the different methodology of the studies and the different settings where the studies were conducted. To overcome this, we performed sub-group analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression to explore factors that affected the outcomes. Six, the inclusion of unpublished studies may be a limitation of this study because some unpublished manuscripts may not eventually meet with a quality peer reviewed article. Seven, no study was obtained from some Ethiopian regions, such as Afar, Benshangul-Gumuz, Tigray, Somali, Gagmbela regions, and Dire Dawa city administrations affect the representatives of our finding. Seven, our review was limited by the information available; not all included studies focused solely on MHM.

Conclusions
This study revealed that only half of the adolescent girls in Ethiopia had safe MHM practices. For menstrual absorbents, more than half of adolescent girls use homemade cloth. Disposal of absorbent material into the latrine was the most common practice in Ethiopia. The study also revealed that one in four girls reported missing one or more school days during menstruation. To ensure that girls in Ethiopia can manage menstruation hygienically and with dignity; strong gender-specific WASH facilities along with awareness creation activities at every level are needed. Given the numerous challenges that adolescent girls face in the country, it is evident that promoting MHM is more than just a sanitation issue; it is also an important step toward protecting girls' dignity, bodily integrity, and overall life opportunities. Above all, schoolgirls require effective, safe, and free/affordable menstrual hygiene products to improve menstrual hygiene practice and support girls school attendance.