Effect Of Maternal Growth Monitoring Knowledge On Stunting, Wasting And Underweight Among Children 0-18 Months In Tamale Metropolis Of Ghana

doi:10.21203/rs.2.16457/v2

Download PDF

Research note

Effect Of Maternal Growth Monitoring Knowledge On Stunting, Wasting And Underweight Among Children 0-18 Months In Tamale Metropolis Of Ghana

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.16457/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 29 Jan, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Research Notes →

You are reading this latest preprint version

This study sought to assess maternal growth monitoring knowledge and its effect on stunting, wasting and underweight among children 0-18 months in the Tamale Metropolis. An analytical cross-sectional study design, involving 340 mother-child pairs randomly selected from 4 health facilities in the Tamale Metropolis, was used. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics and maternal growth monitoring knowledge. Weight and length of children were taken to assess nutritional status (stunting, underweight and wasting). Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the association between maternal growth monitoring knowledge level and child nutritional status.This study sought to assess maternal growth monitoring knowledge and its effect on stunting, wasting and underweight among children 0-18 months in the Tamale Metropolis. An analytical cross-sectional study design, involving 340 mother-child pairs randomly selected from 4 health facilities in the Tamale Metropolis, was used. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics and maternal growth monitoring knowledge. Weight and length of children were taken to assess nutritional status (stunting, underweight and wasting). Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the association between maternal growth monitoring knowledge level and child nutritional status.

Maternal & Fetal Medicine

Pediatrics

Growth monitoring

knowledge

wasting

stunting

underweight

Tamale

Child growth monitoring is aimed at improving and maintaining child health and nutrition[1]. It is so far the best strategy carried out worldwide to tackle malnutrition[2].It involves regular measurement and plotting of a child’s weight on a growth chart[3, 4]. Growth monitoring is a process of regularly following the growth rate of a child in comparison to standard anthropometric measurements[2]. It is usually coupled with promotional activities such as counselling and actions to improve growth, as weighing and charting alone cannot improve growth[3, 4]. Assessing growth allows capturing growth faltering before the child reaches the status of under-nutrition thereby reducing the risk of death [5].According to Schwinger et al. [6], assessing a child’s growth trajectory provides a more accurate prognosis of likely death than the use of static measures of nutritional status. Sinaga et al.[7]also revealed that growth monitoring has a positive impact on infant feeding practices and calorie intake.

Growth monitoring is practiced worldwide[8] and its coverage in Ghana is95.3%[9]. A79% coverage has also been reported in the Tamale Metropolis[10]. Despite its wide coverage, the prevalence of malnutrition is still high, indicating that it may be poorly implemented. Globally, approximately half of all deaths in under five children are link to malnutrition, translating into the loss of about 3 million lives a year[5].The prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight for children under five years are 19%, 5% and 11% respectively in Ghana and 33.1%, 6.3% and 20% respectively in Northern region[11].Malnutrition puts children at greater risk of dying from common infections, increases the frequency and severity of such infections, and delays recovery[5].

It has been established in other settings that poor knowledge on growth monitoring among mothers is associated with poor implementation of growth monitoring[9, 12] which results in high malnutrition rate. However, growth monitoring knowledge among mothers and its relation to child nutritional status is unknown in the Tamale Metropolis. Hence this study sought to assess maternal growth monitoring knowledge and its effect on nutritional status of children 0-18 months in the Tamale Metropolis.

Study design, study setting and sampling

An analytical cross-sectional study design was employed and involved 340 mother-child pairs selected from 4 health facilities (Tamale Central Hospital, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, Nyohini Health Centre and Bulpiela Health Centre) in the Tamale Metropolis. The study was carried out from May 10 to June 15, 2018. Simple random sampling method was used in selecting the 4 study health facilities from all (10) the public health facilities in the Tamale Metropolis. Mothers with children aged 0-18 months attending the child welfare clinics of the selected health facilities were eligible for the study. Subjects who were very ill (unstable vital signs/mental status) were excluded from the study.

Sample size was determined using the formula: (See Formula 1 in the Supplementary Files)

Where:

N is the sample size; z is the abscissa of the normal curve that cut-off an area at the tail (1.96); P is the estimated proportion of an attribute (stunting) that is present in the study population, which is 33.1% [11] in Northern region; M.E is the desired level of precision (5%=0.05). (see Formula 2 in the Supplementary Files)

Therefore, sample size for the study was 340 respondents.

Data collection

A pretested structured questionnaire was used to document information on participants’ demographic characteristics (sex of child, age of mother and child, mothers’ educational level, religion, occupation and marital status) and level of maternal knowledge on growth monitoring. Regarding growth monitoring knowledge, the questionnaire items were adapted from similar studies (9, 14). A composite score was on mothers’ responses to the questions. A score of 1 (maximum score) was assigned to a correct response while a score of 0 (minimum score) was assigned to an incorrect response. Mothers who scored 0-4 for the knowledge questions were considered to have poor knowledge while those who scored 5-8 for the knowledge questions were considered to have good knowledge. Anthropometric measurements (length and weight) of the children were taken and nutritional status (stunting, wasting and underweight) assessed in accordance with WHO standards[14].Length of children was measured using an infantometre to the nearest 0.1cm. Weight of children was measured using a digital electronic weighing scale (Seca 874) to the nearest 0.1kg. Height-for-age Z-score (HAZ), weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ), and weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) <-2 standard deviations (-2SD) from the median of the WHO Growth Standards were defined as stunting, wasting, and underweight respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Data entry and analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM, version 21) and WHO Anthro software. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the association between maternal growth monitoring knowledge level and child nutritional status (stunting, wasting and underweight). P< 0.05 was considered significant at two tailed tests. Percentages and cross tabulations were used to show respondents’ responses.

Socio –demographic characteristics of the study sample

The mean age of mothers was 29.26±5.64 years with the minimum and maximum ages of 17 and 50 years respectively. Most of the mothers (44.7 %) had no formal education, with 96.8 % being married. Moreover, majority of the mothers were self-employed (71.8%), belonged to Dagomba ethnic group (80.9%) and Islamic religion (93.8%). The mean age of children was 5.7 ± 4.3 months, with majority of them in the age group 0-5 months (57.4%). Also, majority of the children were males (51.5%). Table 1 depicts the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.

Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics

Characteristic	Category	Frequency (%)
Age of mother (years)	17-27	146 (42.9)
	28-37	158 (46.5)
	>38	36 (10.6)
Education	None	152 (44.7)
	Primary	31 (9.1)
	Middle/JHS	59 (17.4)
	SHS/Vocational training	51 (15)
	Tertiary	47 (13.8)
Occupation	Employed	38 (11.2)
	Self employed	244 (71.8)
	Unemployed	58 (17)
Ethnicity	Dagomba	275 (80.9)
	Gonja	19 (5.6)
	Mamprusi	11 (3.2)
	Others	35 (10.3)
Religion	Christianity	21 (6.2)
	Islam	319 (93.8)
Age of child (months)	0-5	195 (57.4)
	6-11	102 (30)
	12-18	43 (12.6)
Sex of child	Male	175 (51.5)
	Female	165 (48.5)

Maternal growth monitoring knowledge level

Table 2 shows maternal growth monitoring knowledge level. Majority of the mothers referred to weighing (80.6%) as the meaning of growth monitoring. A large section (85.6%) of the mothers said growth monitoring is important as it determines the child’s nutritional status. Also, majority (92.9%) said every mother ought to attend growth monitoring sessions once every month. Some of the mothers (31.8%) said the growth chart represents the growth of the child. With regards to overall knowledge level of mothers, 12.4% had poor knowledge while 87.6% had good knowledge.

Table 2: Maternal growth monitoring knowledge

Characteristic	Category	Frequency (%)
When you hear growth monitoring,	Weighing	274 (80.6)
what comes to mind?	Immunization	62 (18.2)
	Treatment of malnourished children	4 (1.2)
Importance of growth monitoring	Determines child’s nutritional status	291 (85.6)
	Educates about appropriate child feeding	44 (12.9)
	Don’t know	4 (1.2)
	Not important	1 (0.3)
Number of times one is supposed	Once a month	316 (92.9)
to go for growth monitoring	Twice every month	15 (4.4)
Sessions	Once every six months	4 (1.2)
	Don’t know	5 (1.5)
When is one to start going for	At birth	282 (82.9)
growth monitoring sessions?	At one month of age	53 (15.6)
	At one year of age	5 (1.5)
Age range for growth monitoring	Children < 2 years of age	208 (61.2)
	Children 0-5 years of age	110 (32.3)
	Don’t know	22 (6.5)
One responsible for growth	Nurses	321 (94.4)
monitoring provision	Midwives	10 (2.9)
	Doctors	8 (2.4)
	Teachers	1 (0.3)
Where growth monitoring services	Hospitals	79 (23.2)
are provided?	Health centers	248 (72.9)
	Don’t know	13 (3.8)
What does a growth chart	It shows the age of child	63 (18.5)
represent?	It shows how the child is growing	107 (31.5)
	It has no meaning	28 (8.2)
	Don’t know	142 (41.8)
Knowledge level	Poor knowledge	42 (12.4)
	Good knowledge	298 (87.6)

Nutritional status of children

The mean HAZ, WHZ and WAZ were 0.1±1.7, -1.08±1.75 and -0.78±1.4 respectively (Additional file 1).The prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight were 9.4 %, 25.9 % and 17.9% respectively (Additional file 2). It was also revealed in the present study that stunting and underweight were significantly associated with maternal education (p=0.008) and age of child (p=0.003) respectively (Additional file 3).

Relationship between maternal growth monitoring knowledge and child nutritional status

It was revealed in the present study that the association between maternal growth monitoring knowledge and stunting (p=0.781), underweight (p=0.529) and wasting (p=0.743) is statistically insignificant as shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Relationship between maternal growth monitoring knowledge and stunting, wasting and underweight

Stunting

Characteristic

Stunted

N=32 (%)

Not stunted

N=308 (%)

Total

N=340 (%)

P-value

Knowledge level

Poor knowledge

Good knowledge

3 (7.1)

29 (9.7)

39 (92.9)

269 (90.3)

42 (100)

298 (100)

0.781

Underweight

Characteristic

Underweight

N=61 (%)

Not underweight

N=279 (%)

Total

N=340 (%)

P-value

Knowledge level

Poor knowledge

Good knowledge

9 (21.4)

52 (17.4)

33 (78.6)

246 (82.6)

42 (100)

298 (100)

0.529

Wasting

Characteristic

Wasted

N=88 (%)

Not wasted

252 (%)

Total

N=340 (%)

P-value

Knowledge level

Poor knowledge

Good knowledge

10 (23.8)

78 (26.2)

32 (76.2)

220 (73.8)

42 (100)

298 (100)

0.743

With regards to knowledge level of mothers on growth monitoring, the study revealed that majority (80.6%) of respondents chose weighing as the meaning of growth monitoring. This finding is comparable to that of Debuo et al.[9] in Lawra District, Upper West Region of Ghana, where 70.3% of mothers chose weighing as the meaning of growth monitoring. This indicates that there has been a lot of education on growth monitoring among mothers in both districts. Apart from massive education, it could also mean that the health personnel used similar approaches in delivering information to mothers. The present study also revealed that 85.6% of mothers thought growth monitoring improves children’s nutritional status and subsequently growth. This finding is similar to findings of other studies[9, 15]. In addition, 92.9% of participants in the current study said that growth monitoring is provided every month. A similar study by Daniel et al. [15]in Ethiopia revealed that 32.1% of the respondents said growth monitoring services is provided every month. The difference in findings could be due to the fact that mothers in Ethiopia did not receive adequate education on interval of growth monitoring visits as compared to mothers in Ghana. It could also be due to differences in health policy implementation between Ghana and Ethiopia. Furthermore, 98.5% of the respondents know when growth monitoring services should begin. In a similar study [15], a higher percentage (68.2%) of mothers know when growth monitoring services ought to begin. If mothers know when growth monitoring is supposed to begin then there is a high probability that mothers will start growth monitoring early and could reap the full benefits of growth monitoring services. This study also uncovered that 32.1% of mothers felt growth monitoring was for children between the ages of 0-5years.This finding is also in consonance with that of Daniel et al. [15].

Regarding the overall knowledge level of mothers on growth monitoring, 87.6% of the mothers had good knowledge in the present study. Similarly, a good knowledge level was also reported in studies conducted in Ghana[9, 16] and other parts of the world [17, 18].Contrarily, a study by Daniel et al.[15] revealed that 53% of mothers had poor knowledge on growth monitoring, which could be due to inadequate education on growth monitoring in this setting.

The prevalence of stunting in the sampled population was 9.4%. This result is much lower than the Northern regional prevalence of 33.1% reported in the most recent Ghana Demographic Health Survey (GDHS) in 2014 [11]. It is also lower than the national stunting prevalence of 18.7 % reported by WHO in 2014 [19]. The present study was conducted among children aged 0-18 months while that of GDHS and WHO were among children under 5 years, this methodological difference could partly account for the lower prevalence recorded in the present study. It is also worth noting that the prevalence rates reported by GDHS and WHO were average figures for Northern region and Ghana respectively, suggesting that other places in the Northern region or Ghana could have lower prevalence rates, hence the finding of the present study. Moreover, the decreasing trend in stunting prevalence in the Northern region since 2011 could also account for the low prevalence reported in the present study. The prevalence of stunting decreased from 37.4% in 2011[20]to 33.1% in 2014[11]. Although the prevalence of stunting is on the decrease, the finding of the present study shows that it is still a public health concern in Northern region of Ghana. The prevalence rates of underweight and wasting were 25.9% and 17.9% respectively in the present study. Regarding underweight, the prevalence rate in the current study was higher than the prevalence rates in Northern region of Ghana (20%) [11] and Ghana as a whole (11.2%) [19]. Similarly, the prevalence of wasting in the present study was higher than the prevalence rates in Northern region (6.3%) [11] and Ghana (5%) [19]. Again, the difference in methodologies employed may partly explain the difference in findings between the present and previous studies. Also, the high prevalence rates of underweight and wasting in the present study could be an indication that enough emphasis has not been laid on interventions geared towards tackling underweight and wasting in the Metropolis. Although underweight among children under five is not considered public health concern in Ghana[20] and Northern region[11], this study has shown that underweight should be considered a public health concern for children between 0-18 months in the Tamale Metropolis.

Moreover, no association was established between maternal growth monitoring knowledge level and stunting, underweight and wasting. On the other hand, a study revealed a significant association between underweight (p= 0.02) and maternal growth monitoring knowledge[21]. The variation in findings could be attributed to differences in attitudes and practices of mothers in relation to growth monitoring in both settings. The finding of the present study shows that good maternal knowledge of growth monitoring does not automatically translates to improved child nutritional status, unless it is coupled with good attitude and practices of growth monitoring.

Growth monitoring knowledge level of the mothers is high, but has no effect on stunting, wasting and underweight among children 0-18 months in the Tamale Metropolis.

The cross-sectional nature of the study does not provide a good basis for determining causality as both exposure and outcome were assessed simultaneously. Moreover, nutritional status of the mothers was not assessed. This notwithstanding, we trust the study shed some light on the effect of maternal growth monitoring knowledge on child nutritional status in the Tamale Metropolis.

GDHS: Ghana Demographic Health Survey; HAZ: Height-for Age-Z-score; M. E: Marginal Error; WAZ: Weight-for-Age-Z-score; WHO: World Health Organization; WHZ: Weight-for-Height-Z-score

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval to conduct the study was given by the Joint Ethical Review Committee of the School of Medicine and Health Sciences and School of Allied Health Sciences, University for Development Studies (Protocol Number 05-2018). Permission was obtained from the Tamale Metropolitan Health Directorate and the hospitals of study. Written informed consent was also obtained from participants after providing them with sufficient information about the study. Regarding participants who were less than 18 years of age, written informed consent was obtained from their parents. Participants were also assured of the confidentiality of the information provided.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

We did not receive funding for this study

Authors' contributions

Authors BM, AMM, MM and AA designed the study. Author BM, AMM, MM performed field data collection. Authors BM, AMM and AA analyzed the study results. BM and AA wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Authors A-RA and AW contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the mothers who willingly consented to participate in this study. We also wish to thank all the staff of the health facilities for their support during the study.

Griffiths, M. and J.D. Rosso, Growth monitoring and the promotion of healthy young child growth: evidence of effectiveness and potential to prevent malnutrition. Washington, DC: Manoff Group, 2007. 36.
Österberg, M., Nursing staff´ s experiences of working with children's Growth Monitoringand Promotion in Zambia. 2016.
Panpanich, R. and P. Garner, Growth monitoring in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1999(4).
Garner, P., R. Panpanich, and S. Logan, Is routine growth monitoring effective? A systematic review of trials. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2000. 82(3): p. 197-201.
UNICEF, Revisiting growth monitoring and its evolution to promoting growth as a strategic program approach: building consensus for future program guidance. Report of the technical consultation on growth monitoring and promotion. Book Revisiting Growth Monitoring and Its Evolution to Promoting Growth as a Strategic Program Approach: Building Consensus for Future Program Guidance. Report of the Technical Consultation on Growth Monitoring and Promotion, 2007.
Schwinger, C., L.T. Fadnes, and J. Van den Broeck, Using growth velocity to predict child mortality, 2. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. 103(3): p. 801-807.
Sinaga, H.T., et al., Using scores in interpreting growth status effectively improved infant feeding practices and calorie intake of child aged 0–12 months. Int. J. Med. Sci. Public Health, 2016. 5: p. 1014-1020.
De Onis, M., T.M. Wijnhoven, and A.W. Onyango, Worldwide practices in child growth monitoring. The Journal of pediatrics, 2004. 144(4): p. 461-465.
Debuo, T.D., et al., Caregivers Knowledge, Attitude and Practices on Child Growth Monitoring and Promotion Activities in Lawra District, Upper West Region of Ghana. Science Journal of Public Health, 2017: p. 20-30.
Service, G.S., 2010 Population & Housing Census: District Analytical Report: Agotime Ziope District. 2014: Ghana statistical service.
Service, G.S., Ghana demographic and health survey 2014. 2015, GSS, GHS, and ICF International Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Roberfroid, D., et al., Perceptions of growth monitoring and promotion among an international panel of district medical officers. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 2005: p. 207-214.
Cochran, W.G., Sampling techniques. 2007: John Wiley & Sons.
Organization, W.H., WHO child growth standards: length/height for age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age, methods and development. 2006: World Health Organization.
Daniel, B., et al., Knowledge and Attitude on Growth Monitoring and its Associated Factors among Mothers/Guardians of Children Less than Two Years in Areka Town, Southern Ethiopia, 2017. J Nutr Disorders Ther, 2017. 7(216): p. 2161-0509.1000216.
Gyampoh, S., G.E. Otoo, and R.N.O. Aryeetey, Child feeding knowledge and practices among women participating in growth monitoring and promotion in Accra, Ghana. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014. 14(1): p. 180.
Wamani, H., et al., Infant and young child feeding in western Uganda: knowledge, practices and socio-economic correlates. Journal of tropical pediatrics, 2005. 51(6): p. 356-361.
Otoo, G.E., A.A. Lartey, and R. Pérez-Escamilla, Perceived incentives and barriers to exclusive breastfeeding among periurban Ghanaian women. Journal of Human Lactation, 2009. 25(1): p. 34-41.
World Health Organisation, Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition. [Cited: October 10, 2019.] 2019. https://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/database/en/.
Ghana Statistical Service, G., Ghana multiple indicator cluster survey with an enhanced malaria module and biomarker. Final Report, 2011.
Ashworth, A., R. Shrimpton, and K. Jamil, Growth monitoring and promotion: review of evidence of impact. Maternal & child nutrition, 2008. 4: p. 86-117.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 29 Jan, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Research Notes →

Editorial decision: Accept
15 Jan, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
08 Jan, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
30 Dec, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
30 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
26 Dec, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
25 Dec, 2019
Editor invited by journal
25 Dec, 2019

You are reading this latest preprint version

Effect Of Maternal Growth Monitoring Knowledge On Stunting, Wasting And Underweight Among Children 0-18 Months In Tamale Metropolis Of Ghana

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2

Abstract

Introduction

Methodology

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Limitations

List of Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2