In this study participants from 14 different countries, both developing and developed, were targeted to assess adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Factors such as demographic features, gaps in knowledge, essential behaviours, and practices regarding the pandemic, as well as association with self and family COVID-19 positivity were accounted for, to assess difference in compliance in the developed and developing world.
Majority of the participants in this study are from Pakistan and the USA (from the developing and developed category respectively). In Pakistan, the first case was identified on February 26th, 2020 whereas COVID-19 was introduced in the USA nearly a month prior, with the first case emerging on January 20th. In fact, most developed countries including Canada, Germany and the UK had isolated positive cases by the end of January 2020. (10) Unlike most of Europe and the USA, developing countries like Pakistan had the added time required to formulate, implement, and execute the necessary policies. Perhaps for this reason, a greater number of participants from the developing world were found to be more compliant in this study; and there is a significant difference between the developed and developing countries in maintaining safe distance and decreasing the frequency of going out, as well as in the usage of face masks. Timely media campaigns and imposition of strict measures may have contributed to increased compliance in the developing world. Furthermore, it was imperative for developing countries to invest in preventative measures as the health system is poorly designed to be able to keep up with the onslaught of positive cases. These countries lack the ability to scale up testing and treatment in times of crisis. For this very reason, India’s health system, for example, has been overwhelmed during the second wave and India’s testing rate remains poor. In contrast to the UK testing 0.5 million individuals daily, India had run a total of only 1.75 million PCR samples by 27th April 2021. (11) Large scale outbreaks acutely overburden health services, even more so when health-care expenditure is largely out of pocket, and tertiary hospitals are scarce and rarely internationally accredited, such as is the case in most developing countries. (12) Healthcare provision may be easily and severely overwhelmed in developing countries, therefore prompting administrations to endorse and encourage compliance to preventative measures. Conversely, countries such as the USA ensure that citizens are insured and a healthcare delivery system is in place, which may be attributed to decreased importance given to preventative measures in these countries. With the advent of vaccination programs, organizations such as the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have allowed individuals to resume social activities without the usage of masks or physical distancing, unless otherwise stated by the relevant authorities. (13) Consequently, 20 states including Florida have lifted their mandate on compulsory usage of masks in public. (14) The Cleveland Clinic and the WHO argue that despite being vaccinated, individuals can still be asymptomatic carriers of the disease and may put susceptible individuals at risk. (15) Noncompliance for this reason may have detrimental effects on health as vaccines are not 100% efficacious, and individuals with comorbidities remain at a higher risk for serious complications. (16)
In the current study, there is significant variation within the developing countries subgroup that had previously tested positive for COVID-19 for compliance to wearing masks in public, with most subjects opting to forgo the use of this personal protective equipment (p value = 0.044). There is also a significant difference in avoidance to going out in the group that was involved with care of COVID positive family members (p value = 0.018), with 58 participants choosing to not comply to the safety measure versus 37 who maintained quarantine. Though not significant, trends from developed countries were the same; and participants chose not to comply with preventive measures. This could be attributed to the view that once infected, antibodies are generated against the virus granting them long term immunity. According to the WHO, antibody titres in infected individuals can vary depending on the severity of symptoms they experience, with asymptomatic individuals having the lowest titres levels. There is insubstantial data on the level of antibodies required to confer immunity and the duration for which they last post infection. (17) Furthermore, this study showed significant association to compliance to hand washing and mask usage within family members with comorbidities from the developing countries. (p value = 0.035) Those with no family history for comorbidities were found to be more compliant. Sanyaolu et al. have reported increased hospitalization, ICU admissions and high mortality in people with comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, chronic lung disease and cardiovascular disease; and have called for mass campaigns to increase awareness amongst these individuals. (18)
Majority of the males, in this study, were found to be more compliant to preventative measures, which include proper hand washing techniques, use of face masks in public, social distancing as well as decreasing the overall frequency of going out unnecessarily. In comparison women were found to be less compliant which, especially in developing countries such as India and Pakistan, could be attributed to the clear-cut gender roles. Men are expected to be the bread earners and thus expected to go out; and therefore, obligated to follow the rules and regulations laid down by their employers. During the pandemic, the aforementioned measures are mandatory to follow in the workplace. Workplaces prioritized working remotely and carrying out frequent screening for employees to minimize transmission. (19) Conversely, women may be undereducated and excluded from social discussions which limits their knowledge on health conditions and had to adequately manage them. Women in both developed and developing countries are more involved in reproductive, unpaid labour than men. (20) Additionally, men are more likely to seek health related advise from licensed practitioner in a formal healthcare setting, whereas women lean more towards traditional healing methods. Even so, in this study, the frequency of male participants was greater (58.9% males compared to 41.1% females) which could account for the disparity in results. However, similar findings have been reported in a previous study by Zhong et al., wherein females had markedly decreased compliance to safety measures during the pandemic. (21)
In this study, there is a significant difference within the age groups in compliance to safe distancing in which adults have the highest rate of compliance in both the developing and the developed countries. The senior age group had the lowest rate of compliance (1.77%). Senior citizens are largely reliant on other members of the family and may not be up to date on current affairs, thus decreasing their compliance. If seniors are living in isolation or residing in old homes, their interaction with well-informed individuals may be limited, adding to the noncompliance. In these participants, comorbidities and chronic illnesses decrease compliance rate to less than 50%. (22) Additionally, in Pakistan, 64% of the population is less than 30 years of age, with 29% of these falling between 15–29 years. (23) This generation gap implies that the older generation may not be as proficient with technology and have reduced access to social media, which if used correctly can be an excellent source of information. Even though adolescents are well versed with online platforms, they may be unable to filter the useful information and are generally found to be engaged in high-risk behaviours and have a 50–70% noncompliance rate to management and treatment. (22, 24) Adults in this study were most compliant to pre-emptive measures (41.2% adults maintained social distancing). Individuals in the adult age groups not only have increased access to information but are also able to better process it. Additionally, they are responsible for the household and form the major workforce; and are obliged to maintain safe practices.
In contrast to the variations in practice observed in this study, assessment of knowledge and attitudes revealed that participants from developed countries are generally more knowledgeable and had better attitudes during the pandemic as compared to those from developing countries. This may be explained by the markedly significant difference in the level and standard of education and income between these two types of countries. According to data from 2019, Pakistan had a Gross National Income (GNI) per capita of $1,410, while the United States had a GNI per capita of $65,850. (25) Similarly, according to data from 2011, the percentage of population in the United States holding a college degree was approximately 29.3% as compared to only 7.4% in Pakistan. (26) This is supported by findings from similar studies which found high income earners to be more knowledgeable about COVID-19 and documented income and education to be highly relevant to knowledge. (27) It was also noted in this study that the smaller families had greater compliance than larger families and extended families. Similarly, participants living in small houses with three rooms or less realized the importance of precautionary measures. There is significant difference between the number of rooms and safe distancing (p value = 0.031) with 36.8% from small houses, closely followed by a figure of 34.3% from the average sized houses. This may be because those living in close knit family settings need to be more cautious in order to avoid transmission to other family members.
Anxiety related to the COVID-19 disease is worsened by regulations that call for strict quarantining. Previous studies explain that the mental burden stems from isolation, missing work, not getting paid and personal trauma. (28) In this study, 179 respondents were in favour of leaving the house for work related activities, 109 believed it was acceptable to go out to meet close friends and family, whereas 203 agreed that one must go out only for necessities such as groceries or medications. Over a hundred participants also admitted that emotional trauma was an important reason for breaking quarantine; these factors included feeling of claustrophobia, cabin fever, domestic violence, and inability to care for family members for extended periods of time. (Fig. 2) Out of the 130 responses in favour of lifting the lockdown, 21% stated effect on mental health as a primary reason whereas 85% of the responses stated effect on economy as the major reason. (Fig. 2) Despite the negative mental and physical effects of quarantining, 22.5% of participants found the time off to connect with abandoned hobbies, 23.7% were able to spend extra time with family members they were quarantining with, and 49% engaged in online courses and social media activities. (Fig. 2) Participants were well-aware of the various myths surrounding the pandemic and agreed that the administrations are required to implement these measures out of need; and 66.5% admitted the need for verifying authenticity of information from credible sources such as WHO, CDC or UNICEF to avoid mass hysteria. When asked about their opinion on compliance to COVID-19 protocols once the lockdown is lifted without the availability of vaccines or definitive treatment, 45% of the participants in the current study were of the view that they would continue with current precautions, and 40% agreed to exercising increased caution. (Fig. 2) However, vaccinations have now become a viable means of attaining protection against the disease. Response is largely dependent on adequate population coverage. With increasing vaccine hesitancy, this has been made difficult. Hesitancy stems from having insufficient information about the utility and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This problem is further exacerbated not only by poor governance, but also by cultural barriers and misbeliefs. (29) Stringent religious views and superstitious beliefs have led to increased mistrust in vaccinations. (30) This is particularly true in developing countries with lower literacy rates and socioeconomic status. In developed countries, antivaxxers continue to undermine the effectiveness of vaccination programs. (29) Johns Hopkins Medicine has countered several false claims and explained that COVID-19 vaccines were developed using mRNA and do not contain foreign objects like magnets or implants. (31) The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommend vaccinations in pregnant females and reason that vaccines have no adverse effects on fertility. (32)
Strengths and limitations:
Survey bias may be present in the study. Data was collected via social media platforms and may not be representative of the entire population. High- and low-income groups were added as generalized ranges and may not be truly representative. Additionally, the number of people in the developed and developing groups in this study are not standardised which can introduce bias.