Background: The available data regarding the safety of morphine use in cases of STEMI with AHF (Killip ≥2) remain insufficient. The aim of the study was to further examine the safety of intravenous morphine in patients with STEMI and AHF over 1 year of follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
Methods: 275 consecutive patients with STEMI and AHF were included and divided into groups that did or did not receive in-hospital intravenous morphine. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization and 1 year of follow-up.
Results: The in-hospital occurrences of cardiac death and cardiogenic shock were much higher in patients who received morphine than that those who did not (15.20% vs 6.67%, p=0.035; odds ratio [OR]=2.509, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.121–5.620, and 14.40% vs 6.00%, p=0.033; OR=2.636, 95% CI 1.139-6.097, respectively). Additionally, more patients in the group treated with morphine experienced the secondary outcome of in-hospital invasive mechanical ventilation compared with the group not treated with morphine (19.20% vs 10.67%, p=0.031; OR=2.308, 95% CI 1.138–4.684). However, no difference between-group differences were observed for the incidence of MACEs, cardiac death, or all-cause death over 1 year of follow-up.
Conclusions: Intravenous morphine administration is highly correlated with in-hospital MACEs and the need for additional invasive mechanical ventilation in STEMI patients with AHF after PPCI, but not for long-time adverse outcomes.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Loading...
Posted 15 Sep, 2020
On 21 Oct, 2020
Received 20 Oct, 2020
Received 16 Oct, 2020
On 06 Oct, 2020
On 03 Oct, 2020
On 20 Sep, 2020
Received 20 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 11 Sep, 2020
On 03 Sep, 2020
On 03 Sep, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
Posted 15 Sep, 2020
On 21 Oct, 2020
Received 20 Oct, 2020
Received 16 Oct, 2020
On 06 Oct, 2020
On 03 Oct, 2020
On 20 Sep, 2020
Received 20 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 11 Sep, 2020
On 03 Sep, 2020
On 03 Sep, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
Background: The available data regarding the safety of morphine use in cases of STEMI with AHF (Killip ≥2) remain insufficient. The aim of the study was to further examine the safety of intravenous morphine in patients with STEMI and AHF over 1 year of follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
Methods: 275 consecutive patients with STEMI and AHF were included and divided into groups that did or did not receive in-hospital intravenous morphine. Endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization and 1 year of follow-up.
Results: The in-hospital occurrences of cardiac death and cardiogenic shock were much higher in patients who received morphine than that those who did not (15.20% vs 6.67%, p=0.035; odds ratio [OR]=2.509, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.121–5.620, and 14.40% vs 6.00%, p=0.033; OR=2.636, 95% CI 1.139-6.097, respectively). Additionally, more patients in the group treated with morphine experienced the secondary outcome of in-hospital invasive mechanical ventilation compared with the group not treated with morphine (19.20% vs 10.67%, p=0.031; OR=2.308, 95% CI 1.138–4.684). However, no difference between-group differences were observed for the incidence of MACEs, cardiac death, or all-cause death over 1 year of follow-up.
Conclusions: Intravenous morphine administration is highly correlated with in-hospital MACEs and the need for additional invasive mechanical ventilation in STEMI patients with AHF after PPCI, but not for long-time adverse outcomes.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Loading...