DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-72675/v1
Abstract
Background: Under nutrition is a global problem and in increasing trend in recent years. The burden is high in low and middle-income countries; especially in Africa. Lactating women are among the most vulnerable groups for undernutrition; especially in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the prevalence of undernutrition among this group is inconsistent and inconclusive in Ethiopia, and also the national nutritional plan of 2015 is not yet achieved. Furthermore, to achieve the 2030 Sustainable developmental plan, conducting this type of summarized reviews are helpful. Therefore, we aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of undernutrition and its associated factors among lactating mothers in Ethiopia.
Methods: To write this review and meta-analysis we followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. We used PubMed, Hinari, Cochrane Library, science direct databases, Google, and Google scholar for searching. STATA version 14 software and a standardized format were used for analysis and data extraction respectively. Heterogeneity was checked using I2. A random-effect meta-analysis model was used to determine the pooled prevalence of undernutrition. Begg's and Egger's tests were conducted to detect publication bias. Subgroup analysis was also conducted and association was expressed by a pooled odds ratio with 95% CI.
Result: A total of 16 studies were included with a total of 7830 Ethiopian lactating women. The pooled prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers was found to be 23.86% (95% CI: 19.01, 28.72). The result of heterogeneity test was I2 = 96.7% and p < 0.001). The Begg's and Eger's test findings after we removed two influential primary articles were P: 0.443 and P: 0.306 respectively. Educational status (no formal education) (Pooled OR: 2.30 (95% CI: 1.34, 3.96)) was significantly associated with undernutrition.
Conclusion: The pooled prevalence of undernutrition was high. Maternal educational status was significantly associated with undernutrition. Therefore, the federal ministry of health and the concerned stakeholders should give attention to these most vulnerable groups, refine their strategies to address this issue, and strengthen the implementation of the previously designed strategies.
Nutritional is a vital indicator of the complete health of a population and pillar of development [1]. Undernutrition is more prevalent among children and women; especially in lactating and pregnant mothers. Undernutrition is responsible for 3.5 million maternal and children deaths, 35% of children disease burden, 20% of maternal mortality, and 11% of daily-adjusted life-years (DALYs) [2]. Maternal undernutrition is well-defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m2 [3].
During lactation, there is a high need of energy and nutrients, unless achieved results in poor nutritional status, poor breast milk quality [7, 8] and also has a long term impact on the health of the child and as well as to the community [4]. It also increases the risk of under-five mortality and morbidity [5–7]
Globally, maternal undernutrition is a serious problem but more prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, south-central, and southeastern Asia countries [8]. In 2018, 10.8% of the world population were undernourished, 19.9% in Africa [9]. In the globe, the prevalence of underweight among women ranges between 10 to 19% [2]. In Sub- Saharan Africa countries 10–20% of women are undernourished [10]. Even though all women have a risk for under nutrition, the burden is more common in lactating mothers due to more energy and nutrient requirement than pre-pregnancy and pregnancy periods [11]. Lactating women from low-income countries especially in South East Asia and sub-Saharan African are more vulnerable group to undernutrition [12, 13]. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of undernutrition among general women is 20.6% [14] and the prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers ranges from 5.6 to 54.7% [15, 16].
Low level of educational status, Food insecurity, low dietary diversity score, low family income, and family size were some of the determinants for undernutrition among lactating women [3, 17–19]. One of the target strategic plans under the National Nutrition Program (NNP) by the year 2015 of Ethiopia was dropping the prevalence of undernutrition from 27 to 19 %, but not yet achieved.
Even though several studies were conducted in Ethiopia, all of the studies were single studies and there was a wide range of discrepancy in under-nutrition prevalence among lactating mothers in Ethiopia that ranges from 5.6 to 54.7% [15, 16]. Consequently, providing summarized evidence is important for policy maker’s to revise their strategies and to strengthen the implementation of the designed interventions and to achieve the global sustainable development plan goal 2.2 and 3.1 [20]. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study was aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of under-nutrition and its associated factors among lactating mothers in Ethiopia.
Initially, databases were searched to check for the presence of similar systematic review to avoid duplication using website https://www2.le.ac.uk/library/find/databases/p/Prospero. Searching of primary articles was conducted from PubMed, Hinari, Science Direct, and Cochrane library databases. Furthermore, grey literature was retrieved from Google and Google scholar. Furthermore, the reference lists of published articles were searched to recognize other relevant articles that did not shown in databases. During the search process, to decrease the number of unrelated studies, the search was restricted to only ‘human studies’, ‘women’, and ‘English language’ in the advanced search. The search for primary articles was started on June 26, 2020, and end on August 3, 2020. For searching purposes, we used “Undernutrition OR Underweight AND lactating mothers AND Ethiopia” for objective one and “Determinants OR factors OR predictors AND lactating mothers AND Ethiopia for the second objective as keywords. Both published and unpublished articles that fulfill the eligibility criteria were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. During writing this review and meta-analysis we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [21]. Articles were downloaded to Endnote version X7 to maintain and manage citations, facilitate the review process, and to check duplication of articles.
Eligibility assessment was executed independently by BG and JN in an unblinded identical manner based on the stated inclusion and exclusion criteria. We solved disagreements by consensus and discussion with the two remaining authors.
All observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies) conducted in Ethiopia among lactating mothers and published in English were included. Moreover, articles reporting the prevalence of undernutrition (BMI <18.5kg/m2) and associated factors were included. Both published and unpublished full articles were considered. Both institutional and community-based studies were encompassed.
Studies conducted among both lactating and pregnant mothers were excluded.
This systematic review and meta-analysis have two objectives. The first was to estimate the pooled prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers in Ethiopia and it was calculated by dividing the number of lactating mothers with this problem to the total number of lactating mothers included in the study and multiplied by 100. All articles included in this review and meta-analysis used BMI score (<18.5kg/m2)to assess undernutrition among lactating mothers. The second objective was to determine the pooled effects of factors on undernutrition among lactating mothers in Ethiopia. In this systematic review and meta-analysis variables identified as a factor in two and above studies (articles) were considered to include. To express the pooled effects we used odds ratio (OR) that was calculated from the 2x2 table.
Newcastle Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies was used to assess the quality of the included studies [22]. BG and JN have appraised the studies independently using the above tool. The tool has the following parameters sampling strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size, cut-offs, and reference for the assessment of lactating women undernutrition status, criteria to identify undernutrition, and covariates included in statistical models. The tool comprised 10 criteria for rating different quality elements. After quality assessment studies with high quality (scored 6 and above out of 10) were included for analysis. During the quality assessment, any divergences were solved through discussion, by taking the average result of the two appraisers and by giving the decision for the remaining two authors.
All the necessary data were extracted using a standardized Microsoft Excel data extraction format by two authors (BG and JN) separately. We used two data extraction formats, one for each objective. For the prevalence of undernutrition the data extraction format comprised author name, publication year, region the study conducted, study design, sample size, response rate, outcome measurement tool, study quality score, and prevalence of undernutrition. We also used two by two tables to extract data for objective two (factors for Undernutrition). Any incongruities during the data extraction period between the two authors (BG and JN) were resolved through discussion, twofold checking the varying data together, and third author invitation.
Publication bias was assessed by both methods, funnel plots that are the subjective method used to test for asymmetry [23], and Egger’s statistical test [24]. To declare the statistical significance of publication bias we used a p-value< 0.05. After a comprehensive examination of the included studies, heterogeneity of the studies was assessed by I2 test statistics. I2 statistics described the total variation across studies and declared as low, moderate, and high heterogeneity if it is < 50, 50–75%, and > 75% respectively [25].
We extracted important data from each study using a Microsoft excel spreadsheets and the data were exported to STATA software version 14 for analysis. The standard error of prevalence for each original article was calculated using the binomial distribution formula. The effect size of the meta-analysis was the prevalence of Undernutrition and OR of the associated factors. We used a random-effect model for analysis [26]. To check the source of heterogeneity we conducted a leave-one study-out sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis [27–29]. The effect of the selected associated factors on the outcome variable was examined using separate groups of meta-analysis. To describe the features of the included articles and to display the finding of this review and meta-analysis we used texts, tables, forest plots, and OR and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
After fixing the searching with ‘full-text articles’, ‘women’, ‘English language’ we found a total of 260 primary articles from PubMed (11), Hinari (53), Cochrane library (13), science direct (13) databases, and Google scholar (150) and Google (20). Of these, 94 articles and 148 articles were excluded due to duplication and title and abstract screening respectively. A total of 18 articles were selected for full article reading and 2 records were additionally removed by the studies were conducted in both lactating and pregnant mothers together [30, 31]. Lastly, 16 articles were selected for the final review and meta-analysis [13, 15, 16, 32–43] [Figure 1].
Except for one study [40], all of the included articles were cross-sectional studies. The study was conducted among 7830 Ethiopian lactating women. In this review and meta-analysis, the included articles showed a sample size ranging from 216 [16] to 1140 [32]. Nine (56.2%) of the included studies used a simple random sampling technique [13, 15, 16, 32–34, 38, 41, 43]. Ten (62.5%) of the included studies were conducted in 2017 [15, 34, 36, 37, 39–44] and then after, and only one of the included studies were conducted before 2010 [32]. Regarding the region where the study conducted 6 (31.2%) were from Oromia [15, 33, 35, 38, 39, 43], three were from SNNP [34, 37, 44], three were from Tigray [13, 36, 40], two were from Amhara [41, 42] and 2 were from Addis Ababa [32], and Tigray and Oromia region [16] jointly, one in each. The highest prevalence of undernutrition among lactating women was reported from a study done in Tigray and Oromia region jointly (54.7%) [16] and the least was from the Oromia region (5.6%) [15] [Table 1].
Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers. The heterogeneity of studies used to estimate the pooled prevalence of undernutrition was very high (I2 = 96.7% and p < 0.001). Due to this heterogeneity, we used the random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence of undernutrition and it was 23.86% (95% CI: 19.01, 28.72) [Figure 2]. In this review and meta-analysis, there was publication bias that was confirmed by Egger’s test (P: 0.001) and the Funnel plot [Figure 3]. But after we removed the highly varying two studies [15, 16], the pooled prevalence of undernutrition was 23.12 (95% CI: 19.95, 26.26) and the result of Begg’s and Egger’s test results was P: 0.443 and P: 0.306 respectively. A subgroup analysis was computed to compare the prevalence undernutrition by region, publication year, and design type. Thus, the estimated pooled prevalence of undernutrition was high in a study conducted in two regions jointly (Tigray and Oromia) 54.7% (95% CI: 47.85, 61.55), and the least was in SNNP 19.67 (95% CI: 13.78, 25.55). The least heterogeneity of studies was observed among studies conducted in Amhara, Ethiopia (I2 = 31.6% and p < 0.226). Likewise, the subgroup analysis by publication year showed that undernutrition was high in studies conducted on 2017 and before 28.27 (95% CI: 22.33, 34.21), and also the subgroup analysis by design showed that studies conducted at community had a high prevalence 24.26 (95% CI: 18.12, 30.41) [Table 2].
To assess the factors in this review and meta-analysis we included factors that were significant at least in two primary studies. Dietary diversity, food insecurity, maternal educational status, age, family income, postnatal care service, and family size were identified as a significant factor for undernutrition. However, only food insecurity and educational status were hold all the necessary data to construct 2x2 tables and reported with similar categories across studies. The remaining factors were reported with different categories and don’t contain exposed and unexposed group data. Therefore, due to this reason, we assess the association of the two mentioned factors that contain pertinent data to calculate the effect and undernutrition among lactating mothers in Ethiopia.
Among the two factors included for meta-analysis, food insecurity was a factor in two studies [37, 39] and educational status was identified as a factor for undernutrition in four studies [33, 37, 43, 44]. However, in this meta-analysis, illiterate lactating women in Ethiopia had 2.3 times more risk to develop undernutrition as compared to their counterparts (OR: 2.30 (95% CI: 1.34, 3.96), and I2: 82.8% and P: <0.001) [Figure 4] but there was no association between food insecurity and undernutrition (OR; 3.29 (95% CI: 0.65, 16.76)) [Figure 5].
Lactating women are more vulnerable to undernutrition because they have high food and nutrient requirements during that period [45–47]. Undernutrition during lactation results in long-term effects on later health of the child and the mother [48–50] and if it occurs in adolescents reduces their ability to learn and work at maximum efficiency, affects sexual maturation, and averting the accomplishment of normal bone and teeth strength [51]. Furthermore, undernutrition is a cyclic problem that passes from one generation to another unless controlled early and it also can impact country productivity [11].
In this review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of undernutrition and its associated factors among lactating women in Ethiopia. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies to assess the quality of the included articles and only studies scored six and above out of ten were included in this review and meta-analysis. Due to the existence of heterogeneity random effect model was used for meta-analysis and the pooled prevalence of undernutrition was found to be 23.86% (95% CI: 19.01, 28.72).
The pooled prevalence of undernutrition was 23.86% (95% CI: 19.01, 28.72) and it was similar with studies finding done in seven African countries (12.6% - 31.9%), systematic review done in Africa (23.5%) [18], Iran (26.11%) [52] and rural Vietnam (23.7%) [53]. High as compared to studies done in Uganda (8.2%) [19], India (16.9%) [54], Bangladesh (16.1%) [54], Indonesia (9%) [55], Ethiopia among general women (20.6%) [14] and the global standard acceptable malnutrition rate (10%) [56]. The reason might be lactating women are more vulnerable due to double burden to meet the requirement of her and her child nutrients and energy need, the difference in sample size for instance in Uganda 1356 women, health service quality variation, cultural and socioeconomic variation. This finding was low as compared to the WHO report of Ethiopia (26.9%) [57] this might be due to improvement in service delivery in recent years. In the subgroup analysis by publication year high prevalence was seen on studies done in 2017 and before 28.27 (22.33, 34.21) this might be due to improvement in service delivery quality in recent years.
In this meta-analysis, we assessed the association of food insecurity and maternal educational status with the undernutrition among lactating mothers. However, Ethiopia is one of the food-insecure countries and 10% of Ethiopian citizens are chronically food insecure [58], and the finding of a review and meta-analysis done in Africa revealed that food insecurity is a significant factor for undernutrition among women, in this study food insecurity hadn’t any association with undernutrition (OR; 3.29 (95% CI: 0.65, 16.76)). This might be because in this study only two studies were included to check this fact.
In this review and meta-analysis, maternal educational status was identified as a significant factor for undernutrition among lactating women; illiterate lactating women had 2.3 times more risk for undernutrition as compared to literate women (Pooled OR: 2.30 (95% CI: 1.34, 3.96). This finding was similar to the food and agriculture organization (FAO) study cross countries [59], studies done in India [60], Uganda [19], and Tanzania [3]. Moreover, it was similar to a systematic review done on adolescent undernutrition [61]. This might be for the reason that illiterate women have low nutritional knowledge, low economic status, high household burden, and low right decision-making ability that leads to low use of health care facilities, accessibility of nutritious food, and low health promoting behaviour [62, 63].
Even though this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis, it has some limitations. Of which high percent of heterogeneity across studies, publication bias, a small number of factors assessed to check their association with undernutrition, and a small number of studies included to estimate the effect size of associated factors were some of the limitations observed in this review.
The pooled prevalence of undernutrition among lactating mothers was found to be high as compared to the national and global figures. Maternal education status was identified as a significant predictor for undernutrition. To decrease this burden, the federal ministry of health and strake holders should strengthen their follow-up on the implementation of the designed strategies for this special group since they are more vulnerable among all women. Furthermore, since in Ethiopia 40.4% of women are illiterate [64] long term plan should be designed to increase the access of education for women that was one of the goals of the global sustainable development plan and it is important to decrease the burden of undernutrition among lactating women.
BMI- Body Mass Index, CI- Confidence interval, NNP- National Nutrition Program, OR- odd ratio, SNNP- South Nations and Nationalities People
Not applicable
Not applicable
The data included in this study is available and can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author through this email address; [email protected] or [email protected].
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Not applicable
BG and JN conceived the idea, participated in data extraction, analysis and draft writing. AM and MM participated in the analysis, manuscript preparation, and revision. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be considered for publication.
None
Table 1: Summary of the included articles to assess the prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among lactating mothers in Ethiopia, 2020 (n=16)
Author’s name |
Year |
Study Design |
Region |
Sample size |
Sampling technique |
Prevalence (%) |
Quality score |
Tadege et al |
2019 |
Cross sectional |
Amhara |
266 |
Systematic |
17.9 |
7 |
Biru et al |
2017 |
Cross sectional |
Oromia |
662 |
Simple |
19.5 |
6 |
Wodajo et al |
2018 |
Cross sectional |
SNNP |
422 |
Simple |
15.8 |
7 |
Alemayehu et al |
2015 |
Cross sectional |
Oromia |
355 |
Census |
40.6 |
6 |
Haileslassie et al |
2013 |
Cross sectional |
Tigray |
400 |
Simple |
25.0 |
8 |
Duko et al |
2018 |
Cross sectional |
Oromia |
484 |
Simple |
5.6 |
7 |
Kalayu et al |
2017 |
Cross sectional |
Tigray |
464 |
stratified |
21.2 |
8 |
Hassen et al |
2018 |
Cross sectional |
SNNP |
478 |
Multi-stage |
17.4 |
7 |
Desisa et al |
2015 |
Cross sectional |
Oromia |
317 |
Simple |
20.0 |
6 |
Bekele et al |
2020 |
Cross sectional |
Oromia |
545 |
Systematic |
17.7 |
10 |
Berhanu et al |
2018 |
Longitudinal |
Tigray |
575 |
Multi-stage |
33.6 |
8 |
Kibr et al |
2020 |
Cross sectional |
Amhara |
423 |
Simple |
21.7 |
6 |
Zerihun et al |
2016 |
Cross sectional |
Oromia |
638 |
Simple |
21.5 |
8 |
Kejela et al |
2019 |
Cross sectional |
SNNP |
445 |
Systematic |
26.1 |
6 |
Roba et al |
2016 |
Cross sectional |
T&O |
216 |
Simple |
54.7 |
9 |
Haidar et al |
2003 |
Cross sectional |
AA |
1140 |
Simple |
27.1 |
7 |
Hint: T&O- Tigray and Oromia, SNNP: South nation nationalities and people, AA: Addis Ababa, Quality score was out of 10.
Table 2: Subgroup analysis findings on prevalence of undernutrition among Lactating women in Ethiopia, 2020 (n=16)
Variables |
Characteristics |
No. of studies |
Prevalence (95% CI) |
Heterogeneity |
|
I2 (%) |
P value |
||||
Region |
Oromia |
6 |
20.66 (12.21,29.10) |
97.6 |
P<0.001 |
SNNP |
3 |
19.67 (13.78,25.55) |
87.2 |
P<0.001 |
|
Tigray |
3 |
26.60 (19.2, 34.0) |
90.5 |
P<0.001 |
|
Amhara |
2 |
20.04 (16.35, 23.74) |
31.6 |
0.226 |
|
Addis Ababa |
1 |
27.1 (24.37, 29.83) |
- |
- |
|
Tigray & Oromia |
1 |
54.7 (47.85, 61.55) |
- |
- |
|
Publication year |
2017 and before |
8 |
28.27 (22.33, 34.21) |
94.8 |
P<0.001 |
After 2017 |
8 |
19.41 (12.8, 26.02) |
96.7 |
P<0.001 |
|
Design type |
Institutional Based |
4 |
23.02 (18.59, 27.45) |
80.6 |
P<0.001 |
Community based |
12 |
24.26 (18.12, 30.41) |
97.3 |
P<0.001 |
|
Overall pooled prevalence of undernutrition |
23.86% (19.01, 28.72) |
96.7 |
p < 0.001 |