Morphology of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ)/PVA hydrogel
Scheme 1 shows the fabrication and crosslinking structure of CEP hydrogel. The CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) particles were well dispersed with good anti-sedimentation stability in the PVA solution system (Scheme 1b). The blend was able to produce hydrogel after 3 freeze-thaw cycle, which showed a stable shape and sufficient elasticity when touching with tweezers (Scheme1c). The SEM images of the surfaces and cross-sections showed the hydrogels were highly porous (Scheme 1e and Figure 1), which was caused by the alignment of molecular chains during freeze-thaw cycle and by evaporating water during freeze-drying. The cross-section of the PVA hydrogel showed a valley shape with a few pores. The tropistic arrangement of PVA hydrogel owes to the highly regular crystalline structure of PVA (Gonzalez et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2009). The fibers loosely interweaved with many pores in CEP-5 hydrogel, while the CEP-10 had more uniform fiber interweaving and pore size. The CEP-15 hydrogel with large and small pores showed stacked lamellar (see Figure 1). As measured by N2 physisorbption, the average mesopore diameters were around 2.67-2.78 nm for all hydrogel samples. The results indicate that the hydrogels have a network structure containing macropores and mesopores.
Chemical structural and thermal analysis
Figure 2 shows the FT-IR spectra of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) and all hydrogels. The spectra of CEP hydrogels were similar to that of PVA hydrogel. Two C-H stretching vibration peaks at 3000~2800 cm-1 were observed in CEP hydrogels and PVA. And the spectra of CEP hydrogels contained a weak peak at 1715 cm-1, owing to stretching C=O and C–O of CH3COO- from PVA residual (Mansur et al. 2008). Specifically, all hydrogels had peaks at 1145 cm-1, owing to the crystallization sensitive peak of PVA (Wang and Wang 2016). And with the increased of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) content, the intensities of peaks were obviously weaken, which changed the conformation of PVA chains (Hassan and Peppas 2000; Qiao et al. 2015). These results suggest that CEP hydrogels have the crystalline structure of PVA hydrogel.
Besides, the spectra of PVA, CMC-Eu(Ⅲ), and CEP also show some differences. The bands at 3600~3000 cm-1 were corresponding to the stretching of -OH involved in the intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonds. This peak of CEP was located at 3427~3435 cm-1, which was of lower wavenumber than that of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ), and higher wavenumber than that of PVA hydrogel. The –C=O vibration appeared at 1601 cm-1 of CEP hydrogels showed only one peak, which differed from that of PVA. The peak at 1095 cm-1 originated from –CO– vibration became wider after adding CMC-Eu(Ⅲ). In the spectra of CEP hydrogel, the peaks at 850 cm-1 from C–C stretching vibration weakened slightly compared with that of PVA. These results reveal that the PVA chains in amorphous interact with the unreacted CMC segment of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) by hydrogen bonds and Van der Waals' force (Abou Taleb et al. 2009; Bi et al. 2019; Gonzalez et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2016; Mansur et al. 2008; Miyazaki et al. 2004; Zhong et al. 2020).
Figure 3 illustrates the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of all samples. The PVA hydrogel exhibited the strongest diffraction peak at 19.5°, corresponding to the (101) crystal plane of PVA (Gonzalez et al. 2014; Sriupayo et al. 2005; Wang and Wang 2016). This means that some PVA chains in the hydrogel are still arranged in parallel to each other by folding chains to form crystalline regions (Qiao et al. 2015). 22.7° and 40.4° represent (200) and (111) plane, respectively (Minus et al. 2006). Besides, the diffraction peak of CEP hydrogels at 40.4° was shifted to 42.7° in the spectrum of PVA. The XRD crystallinity of PVA, CEP-5, CEP-10, and CEP-15 hydrogels were 64.96 %, 64.15 %, 61.62 %, and 64.47 % respectively. The XRD crystallinity of the CEP hydrogels had hardly changed. The crystallite sizes were calculated by the Scherer equation (Park et al. 2009), and the results were showed as followed: PVA: 5.47 nm, CEP-5: 5.07 nm, CEP-10: 3.28 nm, CEP-15: 3.70 nm. During the formation of hydrogels, the interaction between the PVA chains and the unreacted CMC segments of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) might reduce the regularity of the PVA chains (Bercea et al. 2019; Mansur et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2010; Wang and Wang 2016), leading to the small crystallites.
The thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves are shown in Figure 4. The thermogravimetric curves of CEP are similar to that of PVA (see Figure 4a). The weight loss before 205 ℃ is because of dehydration of hydrogels. It is worth noting that the weight will not change with the increase of temperature during 205 ~ 240 ℃. The DSC thermograms show a peak at 205 ~ 240 ℃, which is related to the melting process with the crystallization of PVA (Yang et al. 2004). According to Eq 1 of Mallapragada’s method (Mallapragada and Peppas 1996), crystallinity can be calculated and listed in Table 1. The crystallinity of hydrogels calculated from DSC curves were 47.60% (PVA), 42.78% (CEP-5), 45.20% (CEP-10), and 45.62% (CEP-15). The melting temperatures of the hydrogels crystallization zone also were obtained by Mallapragada’s method (Mallapragada and Peppas 1996). The melting temperatures of CEP hydrogels were slightly lower than that of PVA. Melting temperatures is also related to the crystallinity of PVA (Abitbol et al. 2011; Butylina et al. 2016). The results of FT-IR, XRD, and DSC indicate that the PVA chains have hydrogen bonds, entanglement, and van der Waals forces with unreacted CMC segments of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ).
Mechanical performance
Tensile stress-strain curves of all hydrogels are shown in Figure 5a. The curves display typical tensile behaviors, which are broken in the linear elastic region without an obvious yield phenomenon and plastic deformation. The tensile strength (σt) and toughness of CEP hydrogels were significantly higher than those of PVA. Specifically, the σt and strain of CEP-10 were 44.91±2.69 kPa (Table 2) and 90%, more than quadruple and double of the results from PVA hydrogel, respectively.
After stretching, the fibers in all hydrogels were oriented in the direction of the external force and compact, as shown in Figure 5b. The results of XRD and DSC suggested that the crystallinity of all hydrogels did not change much. Even though the CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) interacted with PVA chains in amorphous to form a stable gel network structure, the mechanical properties did not increase accordingly as the increased of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) content in the CEP sample. The porous network structure of the hydrogels might enhance their strength and toughness. The tensile property of the CEP hydrogel was better than that of PVA hydrogel. Moreover, the tensile properties of the CEP hydrogels are different due to their different porous sizes and fiber arrangement. The tensile strain of CEP-5 was better than the other samples because the loose network structure increased the relaxation time of fiber movement. As shown in Figure 5b, CEP-5 was stretched flat. However, the orientation of the fibers was poor, leading to lower strength. The condensed and uniform pore distribution of CEP-10 improved strength and toughness. Therefore. the strength was greater than CEP-5 and the toughness was greater than CEP-15. CEP-15 retained layered orientation after stretching, so it had a large strength, but a small strain due to uneven pore distribution.
Figure 6a shows the compressive stress-strain curves of the hydrogels. The compression properties of hydrogels exhibited nonlinear and viscoelastic behavior. The CEP hydrogel did not show significant rupture on the surface at 70 % strain and was able to return to its original shape almost immediately when releasing the pressure. The compressive strength (σc) of CEP hydrogel was greater than that of PVA hydrogel under the corresponding strain ratio. The σc of CEP-15 was up to 10.14±1.90 kPa, and the compression elastic modulus (Ec) reached 47.17±10.37 kPa. The results are better than the other hydrogel samples in our study, and the cellulose nanocrystal/PVA hydrogel, with σc at 2.1 kPa and Ec at 13.9 kPa, reported by Butylina et al (Butylina et al. 2016). In addition, the hydrogels showed decent compression fatigue resistance. The compression stress-strain curves of hydrogels at 60% strain under five loading-unloading cycles are shown in Figure 6b. The shape and strength remained intact after five cycles. The results suggest that no substantial plastic deformation or strength degradation occurred in the hydrogels, indicating an outstanding recovery behavior, as well as resistance to compressing for application in flexible materials.
The mechanical properties of CEP hydrogels are displayed through knotted stretching and close bending. In the experiment of knotted stretching of the hydrogel, no fracture was observed (Figure 7a). Additionally, the hydrogel was able to totally recovered after bending to 180° and then releasing the pressure (Figure 7b). However, the PVA hydrogel was cracked in the test. The hydroxyl group of CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) and the free hydroxyl group in the PVA are linked by hydrogen bonds, which enhance the interfacial bonding strength of the network structure of the CEP hydrogel, thus improving the mechanical properties (Pan and Xiong 2009). The CEP hydrogels have deformation diversity, good compressive fatigue resistance, and toughness. And the hydroxyl groups on CMC-Eu(Ⅲ) and PVA might make it possible to combine well with the cellulosic fiber, thus the CEP hydrogel can be used as an internal sizing agent, which will not affect the mechanical properties and the application of the as-prepared paper.
The fluorescence spectra of CEP hydrogels display characteristic peaks of Eu3+ ions (Figure 8). Under 615 nm emission, there were 7F0→5L7 at 370 nm, 7F0→5L6 at 390 nm, and 7F0→5D2 at 460 nm transitions of Eu3+ (see Figure 8a). Figure 8b showed a 5D0→7F1 magnetic dipole transition at 595 nm and a 5D0→7F2 electric dipole transition at 620 nm under 394 nm excitation (Van Opdenbosch et al. 2012). The electric dipole transition is greater than the magnetic dipole transition, which means that the coordination environment of Eu3+ ions is not symmetric (Wang et al. 2014). The inset of Figure 8b shows the CEP hydrogels emitted red color under UV light at 254 nm. The results indicate that the CEP hydrogel can function as a fluorescent reagent.
Fluorescent handsheets characterization
Therefore, we fabricated some fluorescent handsheets using different amounts of CEP-15 hydrogels, as it gave the strongest fluorescent intensity. As shown in Figure 9, under sunlight, it is hard to identify the hydrogel dots in FP-1 whereas the hydrogel dots in the FP-3 are bigger and more obvious. The red spots on FP-1 and FP-3 are clearly with bare eyes under UV light. The hydrogel dots of FP-1 are evenly dispersed, and they are within the size range of hydrogels cubes added, while some sizes of hydrogel dots on FP-3 are larger than the sizes of hydrogel cubes added, indicating the hydrogel cubes added aggregated in FP-3 during the paper making. It is worth to mention that the CEP hydrogel can apply to made fluorescent paper as a conventional internal sizing agent. And this utilization can take advantage of the existing process and equipment.
Figure 10 shows the SEM images of the surfaces and cross-sections of the handsheets. By adding the fluorescent hydrogels, the fibers on the surfaces of fluorescent handsheets organize directionally. Compared with the cross-section of the control, the fibers of fluorescent handsheets were compact and order in Figure 10b. Especially, the sizes and distributions of the fibers both on the surface and cross-section of FP-1 were more even.
Figure 11 shows the fluorescent emission spectra of CEP-15 hydrogel and the handsheets. The CEP-15 hydrogel, FP-1, and FP-3 showed characteristic emission of Eu3+ ions. The fluorescence emission peaks at 591nm and 615nm belong to the 5D0→7F1 transition and 5D0→7F2 transition of Eu3+ ions, respectively. The fluorescent property of CEP-15 in handsheet did not change, indicating the fluorescent is stable and this functional paper can be potentially used as anti-counterfeiting paper. However, the fluorescent intensity of electric dipole transition at 615 nm in the handsheets became weaker because of concentration quenching (Lakowicz 2006).
The mechanical properties of the handsheets are shown in Figure 12. Adding CEP-15 hydrogel enhances not only the tensile strength but also the elongation at the break of the fluorescent handsheets. Especially, FP-1 reached 3.52 kN/m of tensile strength and 1.598% of elongation at break, respectively. This might be due to the more compact and orientational of the fibers on the handsheets. Moreover, the fibers on FP-1 were organized more even (see Figure 10). However, the tear strength and fold resistance of the fluorescent handsheets were weaker, especially for the FP-3, than that of control. This might be due to the differences between fibers and pieces of the hydrogels. The regions with the hydrogels could cause phase separation on the fluorescent handsheets. The burst strength increased from 182.50 to 209.25 kPa owing to the excellent mechanical properties of CEP-15 hydrogel, compared with the control. These results demonstrate that the mechanical properties of the fluorescent handsheets are better with adding 1% of CEP hydrogel than adding 3%.