Effect of Flaxseed and Flaxseed Oil Supplemented in Caiman Diet on Meat Fatty Acids

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-733175/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Effect of Flaxseed and Flaxseed Oil Supplemented in Caiman Diet on Meat Fatty Acids

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-733175/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 20 Nov, 2021

Read the published version in Tropical Animal Health and Production →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Increasing polyunsaturated or long-chain fatty acids in meat for human consumption improves both nutritional quality and consumer perception. The increase could occur through the addition of rich sources of omega-3 fatty acids (such as flaxseed or flaxseed oil) to the animal diet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary supplement with two presentations of flax (crushed seeds or oil) on the change of FA content in two cuts of caiman meat (tail and neck). We measured fatty profile in two different caiman meat cuts (neck and tail) from 30 animals (total length 96.7 ± 4.9 cm, snout-vent length 47.8 ± 3 cm, weight 4.2 ± 0.6 kg), raised in individual enclosures, fed three a week for 50 days with: crushed chicken head and a dry food formulated for these reptiles in a 70/30 ratio (C, n=10), control diet with 10% crushed flaxseed (FS, n=10), and control diet with 10% flaxseed oil (FO, n=10), while the remaining days animals were fed the control diet. Meats from animals fed both enrichment diet (FS and FO) showed an increase of C18:3n-3 and ΣUFA respect to control diet. Although both enriched diets raised the levels of C18:3n-3, the neck showed higher values than the tail. We observed that the neck, is more susceptible that the tail to be improved by FO, which could suggest that it is more beneficial to consume neck meat. In order to be implemented in caiman farms, flaxseed oil is more expensive than seed, but more effective, easier to manage and is practical for application on caiman farms.

Animal Science

Caiman latirostris

n-3 fatty acids

Oils

Seeds

Around the world, consumers are increasingly interested in healthy eating habits, with concern for their physical health (Tobin, 2013; Shan et al., 2017). This change in attitude has put pressure on the meat industry to offer healthier products and/or to change the lipid composition of meats by modifying animal diets during their rearing (De Smet and Vossen, 2016; Gómez et al., 2016; Jankowski et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2019). Supplementing animal diets with sources rich in the n-3 family fatty acids (FA) can increase those FA for the benefit of human consumption. The most common FA to be increased are: monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and some polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), particularly n-3, for example α-linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3 n-3), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5 n-3), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6 n-3). They are FAs whose benefits come from prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCD), such as cardiovascular diseases (Siegel and Ermilov, 2012; del Gobbo et al., 2016; Mir et al., 2018). The importance of n-6 and n-3 PUFAs has been known since the 1950s, both for adequate neural development and modulation of eicosanoid synthesis. A recommended level of n-6/n-3 ratio of approximately 4:1 is associated with a decreased risk of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, stroke, certain cancers and immune disorders. In addition, increasing dietary n-3 PUFA can lower plasma triglycerides (Patterson et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2019; Uljević et al., 2019). Consequently, health professionals recommend increased consumption of n-3 polyunsaturated fats because of their positive health effects (Marventano et al., 2015). A natural food source of PUFA such as C18:3 n-3, are flaxseeds and flaxseed oil (the latter used less frequently), applied as a supplement to animal diets to enrich their content in meat (Gómez et al., 2016).

Caiman farming and ranching operations produce skins and meat. It is of great interest of producers to promote an alternative source of FA such as caiman meat (Caiman latirostris or Broad-snouted caiman). Crocodilian meat is traded widely but is particularly favored in the Far East, especially China; the top species in trade are Crocodylus niloticus and Crocodylus siamensis, peaked at nearly 1,000 t traded in good years (Caldwell, 2017). In Argentina and in the world, Broad-snouted caiman meat has special characteristics that makes it unique related to other species that are traditionally marketed, which makes it a product with high potential (Vicente Neto et al., 2006; Simoncini et al., 2020, Nepote et al., in press). Due to the limited production (in kilograms), compared to raising chickens or cows, caiman meat should be marketed as gourmet or delicatessen meat. Around the world, some preparations based on crocodilian meat include: crocodile herbal soup, croc bistek, croc mechado, croc ribs, dried chili crocodile meat, crocodile filet (Coralfarms). In Argentina, caiman meat is usually eaten in pieces and fried, pickled, used as a filling in empanadas, or even roasted.

Compared to the meat of other animals, crocodilian meat is generally high in protein, low in fat (less than 1% in caimans and 2% in crocodiles) and rich in PUFA (Hoffman and Cawthorn, 2013; Canto et al., 2015; Osthoff et al., 2010; Simoncini et al., 2020; Vicente-Neto et al., 2010), and can be enriched with PUFA (Piña et al., 2016). Considering these qualities if we could improve the lipid profile of caiman meat, a very healthy product could be obtained. Also, at the same time, with the consumption of n-3 fats the animal welfare may be improved, since cell membrane enrichment with n-3 PUFA may decrease the inflammatory response, improve growth rate, erythropoiesis, leukopoiesis, and increase specific immunity as evidenced in other oviparous species (Korver and Klasing, 1997; Radwan, El-Samad and Nada, 2012; Abdulwahid and Mudheher, 2017). Regard that the increase of long chain PUFAs in caiman meats for human consumption would improve their nutritional quality, the present work compares two sources of n-3 PUFA, flaxseed oil or crushed flaxseed, as the dietary supplement for farmed caimans. In the case of flaxseed oil, the FA are available and are absorbed more quickly and in greater percentage than when offered as crushed seeds, whose lignins and cuticles of the seeds could hinder this process of digestion and absorption (Goyal et al., 2014). In addition, we must consider that dietary supplement of oil (despite a higher cost) makes application to the diet easier compared, to flaxseed as the seed must be crushed prior to addition to the diet, in order to facilitate the availability of the lipids.

Tail and neck meat cuts provide the highest meat yield in this species, the most representative of the meat and the one preferred by consumers (Hoffman and Cawthorn, 2012; Kluczkovki Jr. et al., 2015; Vicente Neto et al., 2010). Currently caiman meat in Argentina is marketed complete (without head, and eviscerated). A positive outcome of our research would lead to a proposal to offer the market cuts with an added value of lipids that are favorable to health such as the increase of PUFAs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary supplement with two presentations of flax (crushed seeds or oil) on the change of FA content in two cuts of caiman meat (tail and neck).

All the animals were treated following the Reference ethical framework for biomedical research: ethical principles for research with laboratory, farm and wild animals (CONICET 2005) and all the experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the School of Biochemistry (Universidad Nacional del Litoral).

Animal used in this work are part of the harvest of a sustainable management program that uses wild Caiman populations, approved by Provincia de Santa Fe (Law 11820), registered in Dirección de Fauna Silvestre de la Nación (following resolutions No 283/00 y 03/04), fulfils CITES normative and follow recommendations of the Crocodile Specialist Group (CSG/SSC/IUCN). These caiman populations are not endangered.

2.1. Animal hatching and breeding

Caiman latirostris individuals used for this study were provided by Proyecto Yacaré (Larriera et al., 2008). Eggs collected from wild sources were incubated and hatched in an artificial incubator and kept under controlled captive conditions in a heated room (30 °C), in a cement pool (4.5 m wide x 0.8 m high x 0.7 m deep). Inside the pool, each individual had access to water and dry areas; pools were cleaned and the water was renewed every other day. The animals were fed ad libitum six days a week, with a base diet composed of crushed chicken heads and dry feed formulated for reptiles (Avigan ®; Table 1) (70/30; FA profile of diet in Table 2; Larriera et al., 2008, Simoncini et al., 2020).

2.2. Animal testing

The specimens were raised on average for two years to reach the weight and length suitable for being marketed (X ± SD; total length 96.7 ± 4.9 cm, snout-vent length 47.8 ± 3 cm, weight 4.2 ± 0.6 kg). Thirty individuals were randomly selected from the six pools (five individuals per each pool) and moved to individual plastic containers with a capacity of 150 liters. Animals were under conditions suitable for raising caimans, having one-part dry and the other with water, at an average temperature of 31°C. Each caiman was randomly assigned to an experimental treatment. Their weight was recorded with a digital scale (0.1 kg precision) and total length and snout-vent length were measured with a tape measure (0.5 cm precision). After a 7-day habituation, during which the condition of the animals and their normal feeding activity were checked the dietary experiment was initiated.

For 50 days’ caimans were fed according to the assigned treatment: 1. Control Diet (C, n=10): crushed chicken head and a dry food formulated for these reptiles in a 70/30 ratio, 2. Flax Seed Diet (FS, n=10): Control diet with 10% of mass in crushed flax seed, 3. Flax Oil Diet (FO, n=10): Control diet with 10% flaxseed oil (Table 2). We used 30 individual plastic containers: 10 replicates per treatment.

The supplemented diets were given three a week during the entire experimental period, while the remaining days animals were fed the control diet. While previous results obtained from caiman meat enhancement with dietary enrichments were supplemented six days a week (Piña et al., 2016), prior data (Valli, 2020), evidenced modification in caiman tissues with three days a week of supplementation. Therefore, this work attempts to evaluate the possibilities of the most efficient supplementation in terms of time and cost, and that is why we propose three times a day and the incorporation of flaxseed oil.

The control diet as well as the treatments were offered in amounts of 150 g per individual per day (calculated ration of what is offered per capita, in captivity in breeding pools). This portion of food was offered for 24 h, and was withdrawn if there were food leftovers, at the moment we cleaned the enclosure.

The feed conversion rate evaluated in captivity for the species, under similar farming conditions, varies between 5.4 ±0.35 (Parachu Marco et al., 2009). In our study, although we did not measure feed conversion, we ensured that the caimans were fed the portions offered and had food left over (ad libitum), to incorporate the necessary amount of food and energy. After 50 days, animals were slaughtered and tissue samples were obtained (meat cuts from tail and neck).

2.3. Physico-chemical characterization of diet and meat

Diets were freshly prepared, gassed with nitrogen and stored at -10 °C for subsequent FA profile analysis. The animals were sacrificed following the protocol of the Proyecto Yacaré (Yacarés Santafesinos/MUPCN, approved slaughterhouse N° 4081) and according to the sanitary conditions established by SENASA (National Service of Agrifood Health and Quality) for meat production for human consumption. Two samples of 5 g were taken from the tail (Ilio-ischio-caudalis muscle) and neck (Occipito-cervicalis-medialis muscle) of each animal and preserved at -18 °C until further processing.

The FA composition of the tissues and experimental diets was determined by gas chromatography with a Shimadzu (GC 2014) chromatograph equipped with an automatic injector (AOC-20i auto injector Shimadzu) and a flame ionization detector (SFID1). Analyses were carried out with a capillary column CP Sil 88 (100 m length, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25mm film thickness) (Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA, Part N°CP7489). The column temperature was held a 75°C for 2 min after injection, then 5°C/min to 170°C, held for 40 min, 5°C/min to 220°C and held 40 min. Nitrogen was the carrier gas with an inlet pressure set at 100 kPa and a split ratio of 1:20. The injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 220 and 250°C, respectively. Injection volume was 0.5 mL and the column flow was 0.8 mL/min. Total fat in tissues, serum, and diets were extracted using the method described by Bligh and Dyer (1959). Briefly, samples were homogenized in trichloromethane:methanol 1:2 (vol:vol). After drying under nitrogen, the samples were dissolved in 1 mL of hexane for methylation. The fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) were formed by transesterification with methanolic potassium hydroxide solution as an interim stage before saponification (ISO 5509:2000, Point 5 IUPAC method 2.301). FAME were identified by comparison of their retention times relative to those of commercial standards using GC Solution Postrun software (Version 2.30 00 SU6). Standards GLC-463 Reference Standard containing 52 FAME mixture (purity > 99%) and trans-mix GLC 481 (purity > 99%) were purchased from Nu-Chek (Nu-Chek Prep, Inc., Elysian, MN, USA). Linoleic acid methyl esters, cis/trans mix (Catalog #47791) was obtained from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA). Conjugated linoleic acid, cis/trans mix (Catalog #05507) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Others FAME standards were provided by the International CYTED Net (208RT0343). All solvents and reagents used for the FA quantification were of chromatography grade, and all the other chemicals used were at least American Chemical Society (ACS) degree. Values of FA content were expressed as percentage of total FAME.

We expressed grouped as ΣSFA (saturated fatty acids), ΣUFA (unsaturated fatty acids), ΣPUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids), Σn-3 FA (C18:3+C20:5+C22:5+C22:6), Σn-6 FA (C18:2+C18:3 6c9c12c+C20:3+C20:4+C22:4+C22:5+C20:2), and the ratio of ΣSFA/ΣPUFA. Also, we determinate the ratio of C20:4/C18:2 n-6 (ARA/LA), C22:6/C18:3 n-3 (DHA/ALA), and n-6/n-3 ratio.

We estimated the index of D9- and D6-desaturase activities and elongase according to Kazala et al. (1999), Malau-Aduli, Siebert, Bottema and Pitchford, W (1997), and Pitchford et al. (2002), as follows: Index of C16 desaturase activity = 100 [(C16:1 cis-9)/ (C16:1 cis-9+C16:0)]; Index of C18 desaturase activity = 100 [(C18:1 cis-9)/ (C18:1 cis-9 + C18:0)]; and Index of C16–C18 elongase activity = 100 [(C18:0+C18:1 cis-9)/ (C16:0+C16:1 cis-9+C18:0+C18:1 cis-9)]. The atherogenic index, considered as a health indicator related to the risk of cardiovascular disease, was computed according to Ulbricht and Southgate (1991) as: [4(C14:0) +C16:0]/(ΣMUFA+ΣPUFA).

2.4. Statistical analysis

To compare the proportion of FA in two cuts of meat from animals fed different diets we analyzed the data with General Linear Models (GLM). In all cases the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were tested (analyzed graphically and with Shapiro Wilk's test). In all GLMs we analyzed each fatty acid according to the type of cut (two levels: tail, neck) and the diet (three levels: C, FS, and FO) and we evaluated the interactions between the cut and diet variables. If the interaction was not significant (P > 0.05), it was dropped from the model, and the data re-analyzed with a model including only the main effects of cut and diet. In cases where we detect differences (p<0.05) we make a posteriori comparisons using the DGC test. Data were analyzed using the InfoStat software, version2018 (Di Rienzo et al., 2018).

Throughout the experiment, the diets were well accepted. We observed that individuals consumed the same amount of the supplemented diet as the control and animals showed a healthy status without any pathological manifestation associated with the treatments such as lack of appetite, changes in behavior, abnormality in the body, or death. In the dietary treatments enriched with the addition of FS and FO (Table 2), we observed a reduction in SFA, and an increase in UFA, PUFA, more specifically in C18:3 n-3, and Σn-3, with a decrease in Σn-6 and Σn-6/n-3.

The meat cuts (tail and neck) evaluated showed different characteristics. Tail meat presented a higher proportion of C14:0, C16:0, C18:3 n-6 FA, ΣMUFA, index of C18 desaturase activity, and Atherogenic index with respect to neck; and higher proportion in neck of C18:0, C18:1 trasn-10, C18:1 cis-11, C22:4 and ΣPUFA with respect to tail. Furthermore, meats from animals fed both enrichment diet (FS and FO diet) showed an increase of C18:3 n-3 and ΣUFA respect to control. In addition, meats from animals fed the FO diet presented an increased the ratios of C18:1 trasn-10, C22:5 n-3, C22:6n-3 (DHA), Σn-3, and reduced the n-6/n-3 ratio in both cuts compared to animals fed with other diets (Table 3). More importantly are that dietary treatments influenced those meat cuts in different way. Although both enriched diets raised the levels of C18:3 n-3, the neck showed higher values than the tail. Regarding FS, it was less effective on the tail, since we observed that the meat of animals fed with C and the meat of the tail of animals fed with FS, showed less C22:4, higher MUFA, index of C18 desaturase activity and Atherogenic index, with respect to the other cuts and treatments.

In this study we observed that with the addition of flaxseed oil and crushed flaxseeds in the caiman food, we achieved an increase in UFA and PUFA (more specifically C18:3 n-3 and Σn-3 FA) and a decrease in Σn-6/n-3 FA with respect to caiman food of control diet. These changes are mainly due to the C18:3 n-3 increase produced by the addition of flaxseed oils and seeds, which was about 5 times higher than the control diet. It should be noted that although the supplementation was 10% in both diets, the FA profiles obtained from the FS feed show an incorporation of approximately 21% of C18:3 n-3 available in the seed, however, FO showed 27% of C18:3 n-3 available in the flaxseed oil. Also, the total lipids content on diets reflected similar relation.

There is limited information about the apparent metabolizable energy of flaxseed oil and flaxseed, in avian oviparous it was shown that extracted flaxseed oil would have a better C18:3 n-3 deposition rate to egg yolk compared to a crushed flaxseed ingredient when supplemented in a ration of laying hens (Her et al., 2017), showing that oil has a higher availability of C18:3 n-3 than seeds. Even in further processed ingredients such as crushed flaxseed, the flaxseed still contains the components of the seed's cellular matrix that may trap some of the lipid fraction as seen with other seed types (Cassady et al., 2009), which may be a factor in reducing digestibility or availability for transfer omega-3 fatty from flaxseed. In our work the values of C18:3 n-3 and total lipids obtained in the diets seem to indicate that it is due to the amount of supplementation used, and not because of a higher availability in the flaxseed oil with respect to the flaxseed.

Regarding the characteristics of caiman meat, we observed differences in the FA profile between cuts, mainly we could highlight that neck cut presented higher values of PUFA and certain MUFA than the tail. Moreover, Atherogenic index was lower on neck cut than tail and we observed that the neck, is more susceptible that the tail to be improved by FO, which could suggest that it is more beneficial to consume neck meat.

However, in Argentina the entire caiman carcass is sold, so with the few differences found we could not recommend any cut that stands out for its characteristics. Comparison with another caiman such as Caiman crocodilus, Huang et al. (2018) highlighted the higher proportion of PUFAs in anterior body position (foreleg and anterior ventral meat) compared to other cuts. Also, for this same species, Vicente Neto (2006) observed other differences between cuts, tail meat is more tender than that of the back in this species, attributing these differences to the functions, i.e. adaptations of the body to different activities. In our study, probably differences between cuts could be attributed to the same cause, however, we only evaluated the FA profile of the two meat cuts.

When analyzing the total lipid content, the recommended in meat is less than 50% SFA and more than 70% UFA (MUFA and PUFA; Jiménez-Colmenero et al., 2001). Thus, the meats obtained in this work present similar and improved values with respect to the recommended ones (between 27.5 to 28.8% of SFA and 70.3 to 71.8% of UFA). Replacing animal lipids with FA of the n-3 family, in particular C18:3 n-3 and C22:6 is a strategy used to improve the nutritional profile of meats or meat products (Moghadasian, 2008) such as those obtained from pigs, cattle beef and sheep (Berthelot et al., 2012; Kronberg et al., 2012; Mapiye et al., 2013; Morel et al., 2013; Scollan et al., 2014). We obtained in caiman meats when these animals fed diets enriched with n-3 family FA an 1.2 % C18:3 n-3. As mentioned above, similar studies had been conducted on other species. In those species the effect of fatty acid exchange was much more pronounced than observed for the caiman. This low C18:3 n-3 level could be due to several factors. Mainly, most of dietary supplementation studies conducted were conducted on mammals, avian or fish. The caiman is a reptile, and has very little intra-muscular fat (1%, Simoncini et al., 2020), and with a different metabolism rate (more slow), which may also affect the turnover of nutrients.

Second, the feeding frequency of the enriched diet only was three times a week, lower than in other studies. For this reason, this work seeks to compare different types of supplementation sources in order to suggest better and more economical practices to producers. Surely, if we increase the frequency of supplementation and period of time of experimentation the changes evidenced in the meat would be greater.

The supplementation FO increased in meat of animals the ratios of C22:5 n-3, C22:6n-3, Σn-3, and reduced the n-6/n-3 ratio compared to animals fed with other diets. Results reported here show that FO is more efficient ability to enrichment to caiman meats as compared to FS. For this reason, enriching the caiman diet with 10% flaxseed oil for a short period of time, before the animals are slaughtered, is a viable and good strategy to improve the final product as it is the caiman meat. This allows us to obtain a non-traditional product improved in its nutritional value and provide a feasible alternative to be considered as a component of the human diet and an important tool in local or regional economic development in many countries.

Dietary intake of foods rich in n-3 FA family has been reported to be effective in protecting against cardiovascular disease, breast and colon cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease (Pelser et al., 2007; Patterson et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2019; Uljević et al., 2019). According with that and the European Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012, several health claims can be made on foods containing them. Food containing DHA presents healthy properties such as contributing to the maintenance of normal brain function and normal vision, as well as fatty acids such as EPA and DHA contributing to normal heart function (European Commission).

Bolger et al., (2017) mention that Western European countries consume food with a ratio n-6/n-3 between 15 and 16:1, the recommended ratio being between 2.5 and 5:1, with an optimum below 4:1 (Simopoulos, 2002). Although the ratio obtained from the enriched meat is not below optimal values, the diet with flaxseed oil addition managed to improve the ratio n-6/n-3 in the meat, with respect to the control diet. It should be noted that these changes were obtained by offering caimans (only for 50 days, three times a week) a supplement that does not have a high cost compared to others used as marine and algal oils, as they are good sources of fatty acids EPA and DHA. However, we must consider that the incorporation of the latter is limited due to unpleasant flavors associated with oxidation and a product with a fishy taste or odor (Josquin et al., 2012).

Regarding its implementation of enrichments diets in farms, our work shows that flaxseed oil is a well-tolerated and more efficient ability to transfer the omega-3 FA to meat compared to crushed flaxseed. Although the cost of flaxseed oil is 20 times higher than that of flax seeds, the use of the oil would require less frequency or time of supplementation to obtain an enriched meat, besides being easy and simple to incorporate into the diet, as it does not require previous treatments such as seed crushing. In addition, working with flaxseed oil would require less storage space, in relation to the comparative flaxseeds, although stocking of both (seeds and oil) require fresh and dark places and cannot be stored for a long time. Moreover, we must recognize that both flax seeds and oil are functional ingredients that are easily accessible, can be obtained at any time of the year, and are not expensive.

Our studies continue in the development of other qualities of healthy meat and the benefits generated to caimans, since diet enrichment could improve the health status of individuals (immune system, growth, among others) and the quality of the production system. It is considered that in the future new studies related to the enrichment of the diet of these animals with flaxseed will be carried out since they have shown that in addition to having numerous benefits they have antioxidant effects due to their lignans content (Prasad et al., 1998; Pattanaik and Prasad, 1998; Prasad, 1999) and, also due to the presence of phytoestrogens (Babu et al., 2000).

Acknowledgements

We thank other members of Proyecto Yacaré and we appreciate comments and suggestions of the manuscript by Dr. James Perran Ross.

Funding

This work was supported by the Proyecto Yacaré/Yacarés Santafesinos (Gob. Prov. de Santa Fe/MUPCN), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2019 04300 (to P. Leiva)

Conflict of interest

None of the authors had a financial or personal conflict of interest in relation to the present study.

Authors' contributions

The author’s contributions were as follows: M.S.S and C.I.P conceived the study, M.A.G, M.C.L, M.S.S and C.I.P designed the study, P.M.L.L and M.S.S performed the experiment and collected the samples, J.L, M.A.G and P.M.L.L carried out the laboratory analyses, A.E.F, P.M.L.L and M.S.S analysed the data. All authors interpreted results, drafted the manuscript, and they critically revised the manuscript.

Availability of data and material

All data in this research are availability. Compositions of diets shown in Table 1 and Table 2; fatty acid composition of meat are included in Table 3.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Abdulwahid, M.T., Mudheher, S.J. 2017. Influence of probiotic and flaxseed oil supplementation on some physiological parameters and immune response of broilers. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5, 1836-1842.
Babu, G., Mitchell, V., Wiesenfeld, P., Mamie, Y., Jenkins, H., Gowda, U. 2000. Nutritional and hematological impact of dietary flaxseed and defatted flaxseed meal in rats. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 51, 109-117.
Berthelot, V., Bas, P., Pottier, E., Normand, J. 2012. The effect of maternal linseed supplementation and/or lamb linseed supplementation on muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue fatty acid composition of indoor lambs. Meat Science, 90, 548-557.
Bligh, E.G., Dyer, W.J. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, 911–917.
Bolger, Z., Brunton, N.P., Lyng, J.G., Monahan, F.J. 2017. Comminuted meat products-consumption, composition, and approaches to healthier formulations. Food Reviews International, 33, 143-166
Caldwell, J. 2017. World trade in crocodilian skins 2013-2015. UNEP-WCMC. Cambridge
Canto, A.C., Costa-Lima, B.R., Suman, S.P., Monteiro, M.L.G., Marsico, E.T., Conte-Junior, C.A., Franco, R.M., Salim, A.P.A.A, Torrezan, R., Silva, T.J.P. 2015. Fatty acid profile and bacteriological quality of caiman meat subjected to high hydrostatic pressure. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 63, 872-877.
Cassady, B.A., Hollis, J.H., Fulford A.D., Considine, R.V., Mattes, R.D. 2009. Mastication of almonds: Effects of lipid bioaccessibility, appetite, and hormone response. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 89:794–800.
Coralfarms. Crocodile Recipes. http://coralfarms.com.ph/index.php?id_cms=69&controller=cms. Accessed 06 Oct 2021
De Smet, S., Vossen, E. 2016. Meat: the balance between nutrition and health. A review. Meat Science, 120, 145/156.
Del Gobbo, L.C., Imamura, F., Aslibekyan, S., Marklund, M., Virtanen, J.K., Wennberg, M, Fretts, A.M. 2016. ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and coronary heart disease: pooling project of 19 cohort studies. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176, 1155-1166.
Di Rienzo, J.A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M.G., Gonzalez, L., Tablada, M. & Robledo, C.W.
2018. InfoStat, versión 2018, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
Ehr, I.J., Persia, M.E., Bobeck, E.A. 2017. Comparative omega-3 fatty acid enrichment of egg yolks from first-cycle laying hens fed flaxseed oil or ground flaxseed. Poultry science, 96(6), 1791-1799.
European Commission. 2012. Dietary DHA/EPA supplementation ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by protecting from distal tubular cell damage. European and Commission, Official Journal of the European Union, L 136, 1-40.
Gómez, I., Beriain, M.J., Mendizabal, J.A., Realini, C., Purroy, A. 2016. Shelf life of ground beef enriched with omega‐3 and/or conjugated linoleic acid and use of grape seed extract to inhibit lipid oxidation. Food Science & Nutrition. 4, 67-79.
Goyal, A., Sharma, V., Upadhyay, N., Gill, S., Sihag, M. 2014. Flax and flaxseed oil: an ancient medicine modern functional food. Journal of Food Science Technology, 51, 1633-1653.
Grant, R., Guest, J. 2016. Role of omega-3 PUFAs in neurobiological health. In The Benefits of Natural Products for Neurodegenerative Diseases, 12, 247–274.
Hoffman, L., Cawthorn, D. 2012. Consumer preferences in meat. In International Seminar on Animal Industry.
Hoffman, L., Cawthorn, D. 2013. Exotic protein sources to meet all needs. Meat Science, 95, 764-771.
Huang, Y.R., Tsai, Y.H., Liu, C.L., Syue, W.Z., Su, Y.C. 2018. Chemical Characteristics of Different Tissues of Spectacled Caiman (Caiman crocodilus). Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 27, 132-143.
Jankowski, J., Zduńczyk, Z., Mikulski, D., Juśkiewicz, J., Pomianowski, J.F., Zduńczyk, P. 2018. Fatty acid profile, oxidative stability and sensory quality of breast meat from turkeys fed diets with graded levels of flaxseed oil for different periods of time. Animal Production Science, 58, 1164-1174
Jiménez-Colmenero, F., Carballo, J., Cofrades, S. 2001. Healthier meat and meat products: their role as functional foods. Meat Science, 59, 5-13.
Josquin, N.M., Linssen, J.P., Houben, J.H. 2012. Quality characteristics of Dutch-style fermented sausages manufactured with partial replacement of pork back-fat with pure, pre-emulsified or encapsulated fish oil. Meat Science, 90, 81-86.
Kazala, E.C., Lozeman, F.J., Mir, P.S., Laroche, A., Bailey, D.R., Weselake, R.J. 1999. Relationship of fatty acid composition to intramuscular fat content in beef from crossbred Wagyu cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 77, 1717-1725.
Kluczkovki Jr., A.K., Kluczkovki, A.M., Moroni, F., Markendorf, F., Inhamuns, A.J. 2015. Carcass yield and proximate composition of black caiman (Melanosuchus niger) meat. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 7, 47-53.
Korver, D.R., Klasing, K.C. 1997. Dietary fish oil alters specific and inflammatory immune responses in chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 127, 2039-2046.
Kronberg, S.L., Scholljegerdes, E.J., Murphy, E.J., Ward, R.E., Maddock, T.D., Schauer, C.S. 2012. Treatment of flaxseed to reduce biohydrogenation of α-linolenic acid by ruminal microbes in sheep and cattle, and increase n-3 fatty acid concentrations in red meat. Journal Animal Science, 90, 4618-4624.
Kumar, P., Verma, A.K., Kumar, D., Umaraw, P., Mehta, N., Malav, O.P. 2019. Meat snacks: A novel technological perspective. In Innovations in Traditional Foods pp. 293-321. (Woodhead Publishing).
Larriera, A., Imhof, A., Siroski, P. 2008. Estado actual de los programas de conservación y manejo del género Caiman en Argentina. In Castroviejo, J., Ayarzaguena, J., Velasco, A. (Eds.), Contribución al Conocimiento del género Caiman de Sudamérica. (Publicación Asociación Amigos de Doñana) 18, pp. 141-180 Sevilla.
Li, N., Yue, H., Jia, M., Liu, W., Qiu, B., Hou, H., Huang, F., Xu, T. 2019. Effect of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on blood glucose: a meta-analysis. Food Functional, 10, 4557-4565.
Malau-Aduli, A.E.O., Siebert, B.D., Bottema, C.D.K., Pitchford, W.S. 1997. A comparison of the fatty acid composition of triacylglycerols in adipose tissue from Limousin and Jersey cattle. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, 48, 715-722.
Mapiye, C., Aalhus, J.L., Turner, T.D., Rolland, D.C., Basarab, J.A., Baron, V.S., McAllister, T.A., Block, H.C., Uttaro, B., Lopez-Campos, O., Proctor, S.D. 2013. Effects of feeding flaxseed or sunflower-seed in high-forage diets on beef production, quality and fatty acid composition. Meat Science, 95, 98-109.
Marventano, S., Kolacz, P., Castellano, S., Galvano, F., Buscemi, S., Mistretta, A., Grosso, G. 2015. A review of recent evidence in human studies of n-3 and n-6 PUFA intake on cardiovascular disease, cancer, and depressive disorders: does the ratio really matter? International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 66, 611-622.
Moghadasian, M.H. 2008. Advances in dietary enrichment with n-3 fatty acids. Critical and Review of Food Science and Nutrition, 48, 402-410.
Morel, P.C., Leong, J., Nuijten, W.G., Purchas, R.W., Wilkinson, B.H. 2013. Effect of lipid type on growth performance, meat quality and the content of long chain n− 3 fatty acids in pork meat. Meat Science, 95, 151-159.
Nepote, V. Labaque, M.C, Quiroga, P.R., Leiva, P.M.L, Rey Paez, A., Piña, C.I, Simoncini, M.S. 2021. Sensory Analysis and Volatile Compounds in a Non-traditional Meat (Caiman latirostris) in Comparison with Other Traditional Meats. British Food Journal. In Press
Osthoff, G., Hugo, A., Govender, D., Huchzermeyer, F., Bouwman, H. 2014. Comparison of the lipid composition of three adipose tissue types of male and female wild Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus). Journal of Herpetology, 48, 525-531.
Pattanaik, U., Prasad, K. (1998). Oxygen free radicals and endotoxic shock: effect of flaxseed. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 3, 305-318.
Patterson, E., Wall, R., Fitzgerald, G.F., Ross, R.P., Stanton, C. 2012. Health implications of high dietary omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 52, 1-16.
Pelser, W.M., Linssen, J.P., Legger, A., Houben, J.H. 2007. Lipid oxidation in n-3 fatty acid enriched Dutch style fermented sausages. Meat Science, 75, 1-11.
Piña, C.I., Lucero, L.E., Simoncini, M., Peterson, G., Tavella, M. 201). Influence of flaxseed enriched diet in Broad-snouted caiman (Crocodylia: alligatoridae) meat. Zootecnia Tropical, 34, 25-33.
Pitchford, W.S., Deland, M.P.B., Siebert, B.D., Malau-Aduliand, A.E.O., Bottema, C.D.K. 2002. Genetic variation in fatness and fatty acid composition of crossbred cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 80, 2825-2832.
Prasad, K. 1999. Reduction of serum cholesterol and hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis in rabbits by secoisolariciresinol diglucoside isolated from flaxseed. Circulation, 99, 1355-1362.
Prasad, K., Mantha, S.V., Muir, A.D., Westcott, N.D. 1998. Reduction of hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis by CDC-flaxseed with very low alpha-linolenic acid. Atherosclerosis, 136, 367-375.
Radwan, N.L., El-Samad, M.A., Nada, S.A. 2012. Effects of different dietary ratios of linoleic acid to α-linolenic acid on productive performance, immunity of laying hens and egg yolk fatty acid composition. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 32, 163-188.
Scollan, N.D., Dannenberger, D., Nuernberg, K., Richardson, I., MacKintosh, S., Hocquette, J.F., Moloney, A.P. 2014. Enhancing the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Science, 97(3), 384-394.
Shan, L.C., De Brún, A., Henchion, M., Li, C., Murrin, C., Wall, P.G., Monahan, F.J. 2017. Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier–A conjoint analysis study. Meat Science, 131, 82-89.
Siegel, G., Ermilov, E. 2012. Omega-3 fatty acids: benefits for cardio-cerebro-vascular diseases. Atherosclerosis, 225, 291-295.
Simoncini, M.S., Lábaque, M.C., Perlo, F., Fernandez, M.E., Leiva, P.M.L, Paez, A.R., Teira, G., Larriera, A., Piña, C.I. 2020. Caiman latirostris meat characterization: Evaluation of the nutritional, physical and chemical properties of meat from sustainable ranching program in Argentina. Aquaculture, 515, 734570.
Simopoulos, A.P. 2002. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 56, 365-379.
Tobin, K.J. 2013. Fast‐food consumption and educational test scores in the USA. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 118-124.
Ulbricht, T.L.V., Southgate, D.A.T. 1991. Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors. The Lancet, 338, 985-992.
Uljević, M.V., Starčević, K., Mašek, T., Bočina, I., Restović, I., Kević, N., Racetin, A., Kretzschmar, G., Grobe, M., Vukojevi´c, K. 2019. Dietary DHA/EPA supplementation ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by protecting from distal tubular cell damage. Cell Tissue Research. 1–17.
Valli, Florencia. Enriquecimiento de la grasa de yacaré overo con ácidos grasos omega 3 para la obtención de aceite. Tesina de grado de Licenciatura en Biotecnología. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. 2020.
Vicente Neto, J., Bressan, M.C., Bitencourt Faria, P., Oliveira e Vieira, J., Cardoso, M.G., de Abreu Glória, M.B., Telo da Gama, L. 2010. Fatty acid profiles in meat from Caiman yacare (Caiman crocodilus yacare) raised in the wild or in captivity. Meat Science, 85, 752-758.
Vicente Neto, J., Bressan, M.C., Faria, P.B., Vieira, J.O., Santana, M.T.A., Kloster, M. 2006. Composição centesimal e colesterol da carne de jacaré-do-pantanal (Caiman yacare Daudin 1802) oriundo de zoocriadouro e habitat natural. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, 30, 701-706.
Wu, J.H., Lemaitre, R.N., King, I.B., Song, X., Psaty, B.M., Siscovick, D.S. 2014. Circulating omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and total and cause-specific mortality: The cardiovascular health study. Circulation, 130, 1245-125.

Table 1. Centesimal composition of dry feed formulated for reptile, values expressed in g/1000g.

Centesimal composition of dry feed formulated for reptiles
Proteins	47%
Fat	13%
Fiber	2%
Moisture	12%
Phosphorus	1.5%
Calcium	3%
Energy value	4500 Kcal. /Kg.

Table 2. Fatty acid composition determined in flaxseed oil, flaxseed and the three diets provided to individuals of C. latirostris in captivity.

FATTY ACIDS			DIETS TREATMENT
	OIL	SEED	C	FO	FS
TOTAL LIPIDS	99%	34%	26%	46%	31.5%
FATTY ACIDS
SFA
14:0	0.05 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.2	0.49 ± 0.01	0.41 ± 0.00	0.38 ± 0.02
15:0	ND	ND	0.06 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.00
16:0	5.82 ± 0.07	5.48 ± 0.05	20.63 ± 0.16	17.50 ± 0.23	16.41 ± 0.60
17:0	0.04 ± 0.01	0.04 ± 0.01	0.33 ± 0.01	0.22 ± 0.01	0.28 ± 0.02
18:0	4.45 ± 0.03	4.64 ± 0.08	6.24 ± 0.07	5.87 ± 0.03	5.88 ± 0.03
MUFA
14:1 – cis 9	ND	ND	0.09 ± 0.01	0.10 ± 0.00	0.07 ± 0.06
16:1 – cis 9	0.07 ± 0.01	0.08 ± 0.01	4.41 ± 0.02	3.73 ± 0.09	3.02 ± 0.11
18:1 – cis 9	18.56 ± 0.22	18.11 ± 0.04	33.13 ± 0.40	30.97 ± 0.12	29.18 ± 0.01
18:1- cis 11	ND	ND	1.70 ± 0.03	1.53 ± 0.07	1.44 ± 0.01
18:1- trans-8	ND	ND	0.03 ± 0.00	0.03 ± 0.00	0.04 ± 0.00
18:1- trans-9	ND	ND	0.47 ± 0.56	0.06 ± 0.00	0.06 ± 0.00
18:1 trans-10	ND	ND	0.06 ± 0.00	0.08 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.01
18:1 trans-11	0.77 ± 0.02	0.74 ± 0.02	0.06 ± 0.00	0.05 ± 0.00	0.06 ± 0.00
20:1 - cis 11	0.27 ± 0.08	0.22 ± 0.03	0.30 ± 0.02	0.31 ± 0.01	0.32 ± 0.00
PUFA
18:2 n-6	14.26 ± 0.13	11.75 ± 0.58	27.18 ± 0.15	25.83 ± 0.30	25.43 ± 0.03
18:3 n-6	0.27 ± 0.00	0.28 ± 0.01	0.24 ± 0.01	0.24 ± 0.01	0.23 ± 0.01
18:3 n-3	54.96 ± 0.06	58.69 ± 0.18	2.49 ± 0.09	11.66 ± 0.41	15.75 ± 0.53
20:2	ND	ND	0.22 ± 0.03	0.15 ± 0.02	0.15 ± 0.00
20:3 + 22:0	ND	ND	0.22 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.01	0.20 ± 0.00
20:4 n-6	0.12 ± 0.02	ND	0.78 ± 0.00	0.53 ± 0.05	0.49 ± 0.01
20:5 n-3	ND	ND	0.03 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.00	0.02 ± 0.00
22:4 n-6	ND	ND	0.18 ± 0.01	0.11 ± 0.03	0.12 ± 0.01
22:5 n-6	ND	ND	0.04 ± 0.00	0.02 ± 0.01	0.03 ± 0.00
22:5 n-3	ND	ND	0.11 ± 0.01	0.06 ± 0.01	0.09 ± 0.01
22:6 n-3	ND	ND	0.11 ± 0.02	0.09 ± 0.00	0.07 ± 0.01
Σ SFA^a	10.35 ± 0.04	10.20 ± 0.11	27.94 ± 0.27	24.17 ± 0.33	23.13 ± 0.69
Σ UFA^b	89.27 ± 0.25	89.85 ± 0.79	71.92 ± 1.32	75.76 ± 1.12	76.81 ± 0.77
Σ MUFA^c	19.66 ± 0.11	19.14 ± 0.04	40.30 ± 10.02	36.86 ± 0.30	34.24 ± 0.16
Σ PUFA^d	69.61 ± 0.14	70.71 ± 0.75	31.63 ± 0.30	38.91 ± 0.82	42.57 ± 0.61
Σ n-3^e	54.96 ± 0.06	58.69 ± 0.18	2.74 ± 0.11	11.83 ± 0.41	15.93 ± 0.55
Σ n-6^f	14.65 ± 0.11	70.71 ± 0.75	28.88 ± 0.19	27.07 ± 0.41	26.64 ± 0.06
n-6/n-3	0.27 ± 0.01	0.21 ± 0.01	10.53 ± 1.82	2.29 ± 1.01	1.67 ± 0.11

Values are expressed as mean (% of total FAME). Control diet (C): crushed chicken head and dry feed formulated for reptiles (70%/30%), Flax Oil Diet (FO): Control diet + 10% flax oil, Flax Seed Diet (FS): Control diet + 10% mass crushed flaxseeds Saturated fatty acid (SFA), Unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA)

^a Σ Saturated = C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0.

^b Σ Unsaturated = 14:1 cis-9 + 16:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-11+ 18:1 trans-8+ 18:1 trans-9+ 18:1 trans-10+ 18:1 trans-11+ 20:1 cis-11+ C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 18:3 n-3 + 20:2+ 20:3 + 20:4 n-6 + 20:5 n-3 + 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6 + 22:5 n-3 + 22:6 n-3.

^c Σ Monounsaturated = 14:1 cis-9 + 16:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-11+ trans-8+ trans-9+ 18:1 trans-10+ 18:1 trans-11+ 20:1 cis-11

^d Σ Polyunsaturated = C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 18:3 n-3 + 20:2+ 20:3 + 20:4 n-6 + 20:5 n-3 + 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6 + 22:5 n-3 + 22:6 n-3.

^e Σn-3 PUFA =18:3 n-3 + 20:5 n-3 + 22:5 n-3 + 22:6 n-3.

^f Σn-6 PUFA = C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 20:4 n-6 + 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6.

Table 3. Differences in Fatty acid composition determined in meat of C. latirostris (g/100 gr) fed different diets (C, FO and FS), between cuts (tail and neck) and interactions between the cut and diet variables; F value of parameter and P value (differences with p value ˂ 0.05 highlighted in bold). DGC test showed the differences among groups of diets, cuts or interactions.

	Tail			Neck
	C	FS	FO	C	FS	FO
TOTAL LIPIDS	0.91 %	0.99 %	1.2 %	0.81 %	0.84 %	0.89%
FATTY ACIDS							F_cut	P_cut		F_diet	P_diet	_DGC	F_Int	P_Int	_DGC
C 14:0	0.16 ± 0.01	0.21 ± 0.07	0.20 ± 0.14	0.13 ± 0.06	0.13 ± 0.03	0.17 ± 0.03	4.92	0.0330	Neck < Tail	0.86	0.4335	-	-	-	-
C 16:0	18.83 ± 1.55	19.01 ± 1.59	17.29 ± 1.00	17.39 ± 0.98	17.54 ± 0.58	17.58 ± 0.62	4.73	0.0362	Neck < Tail	2.50	0.0963	-	-	-	-
C 16:1– cis 9	1.54 ± 0.32	1.95 ± 0.52	1.46 ± 0.56	1.13 ± 0.15	1.41 ± 0.34	1.64 ± 0.31	3.01	0.0913	-	1.76	0.1862	-	-	-	-
C 18:0	9.71 ± 1.17	8.92 ± 0.86	10.07 ± 1.22	10.86 ± 0.77	10.45 ± 0.75	10.23 ± 0.91	9.04	0.0048	Tail < Neck	1.44	0.2519	-	-	-	-
18:1– cis 9	0.02 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.02	0.02 ± 0.01	0.03 ± 0.01	0.03 ± 0.01	0.29	0.5918	-	1.52	0.2322	-	-	-	-
18:1- trans 10	0.01 ± 0.00	0.02 ± 0.01	0.03 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.01	0.03 ± 0.01	0.04 ± 0.01	12.87	0.0010	Tail < Neck	11.47	0.0001	C < FS< FO	-	-	-
C 18:1- trans 11	0.01 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.03	0.06 ± 0.04	0.05 ± 0.03	0.06 ± 0.02	0.06 ± 0.04	1.72	0.1980	-	2.54	0.0933	-	-	-	-
C 18:1 9– cis 9	19.91± 5.35	20.44 ± 2.35	17.86 ± 3.88	15.89 ± 0.44	17.10 ± 2.96	18.49 ± 2.05	3.86	0.0571	-	0.31	0.7385	-	-	-	-
C 18:1- cis 11	4.00 ± 1.22	4.35 ± 0.30	4.49 ± 1.07	5.22 ± 0.75	5.10 ± 0.55	4.62 ± 0.34	6.95	0.0123	Tail < Neck	0.18	0.8392	-	-	-	-
C 18:2 n-6	29.01 ± 1.20	29.45 ± 1.65	28.95 ± 0.96	30.42 ± 1.16	29.85 ± 1.15	29.42 ± 1.39	2.40	0.1298	-	0.67	0.5177	-	-	-	-
C 18:3 n-6	0.15± 0.05	0.17 ± 0.05	0.18 ± 0.06	0.13 ± 0.01	0.14 ± 0.02	0.15 ± 0.03	5.76	0.0217	Neck < Tail	0.98	0.3843	-	-	-	-
C 18:3 n-3	0.89 ± 0.15	1.08 ± 0.12	0.94± 0.17	0.83 ± 0.06	0.96 ± 0.14	1.09 ± 0.16	0.03	0.8543	-	4.11	0.0252	C < FS and FO	3.66	0.0364	Other interactions <NeckFO and TailFS
C 20:3 n-6	0.30 ± 0.08	0.31 ± 0.08	0.34 ±0.05	0.32 ± 0.08	0.32 ± 0.02	0.29 ± 0.04	0.05	0.8332	-	0.05	0.9544	-	-	-	-
C 20:4 n-6	8.52 ± 2.25	7.44 ± 1.83	8.97 ± 2.50	9.64 ± 0.83	9.01 ± 1.90	8.17 ± 1.66	0.86	0.3610	-	0.55	0.5844	-	-	-	-
C 20:5 n-3	0.12 ± 0.04	0.11 ± 0.04	0.11 ± 0.04	0.13 ± 0.04	0.14 ± 0.03	0.11 ± 0.02	2.59	0.1164	-	0.87	0.4256	-	-	-	-
C 22:4 n-6	1.08 ± 0.41	1.23 ± 0.17	1.66 ± 0.31	1.55 ± 0.23	1.55 ± 0.21	1.40 ± 0.22	4.49	0.0416	Tail < Neck	2.20	0.1265	-	7.31	0.0023	TailC and Tail FS< Other interactions
C 22:5 n-6	0.40 ± 0.23	0.35 ± 0.09	0.51 ± 0.15	0.40 ± 0.06	0.44 ± 0.09	0.44 ± 0.10	0.24	0.6280	-	2.79	0.0745		-	-	-
C 22:5 n-3	1.34± 0.59	1.27 ± 0.19	1.80 ± 0.40	1.49 ± 0.17	1.49 ± 0.29	1.53 ± 0.34	0.06	0.8094	-	3.44	0.0489	C and FS < FO	-	-	-
C 22:6 n-3	2.01 ± 0.65	1.75 ± 0.42	2.86 ± 0.90	2.14 ± 0.13	2.38 ± 0.70	2.92 ± 0.78	2.24	0.1434	-	7.29	0.0022	C and FS < FO	-	-	-
Σ SFA^a	28.86 ± 1.01	28.32 ± 0.92	27.71 ± 0.98	28.53 ± 0.66	28.25 ± 0.36	28.10 ± 0.80	0.03	0.8553	-	2.66	0.0839		-	-	-
Σ UFA^b	69.47 ± 1.36	71.34 ± 0.78	71.80 ± 0.93	71.00 ± 0.73	71.35 ± 0.36	71.55 ± 0.78	2.51	0.1223	-	8.33	0.0011	C < FS and FO	3.35	0.0469	Tail*C< Other interactions
Σ MUFA^c	33.73 ± 8.98	27.50 ± 2.16	24.66 ± 3.93	22.90 ± 1.16	24.32 ± 2.35	25.46 ± 2.12	12.04	0.0014	Neck < Tail	1.94	0.1594	-	6.11	0.0054	Other interactions< Tail*C
Σ PUFA^d	44.64 ± 4.17	43.83 ± 2.16	47.15 ± 3.52	48.10 ± 1.25	47.03 ± 2.56	46.09 ± 1.59	3.44	0.0420	Tail < Neck	0.85	0.4379	-	-	-	-
Σ n-3^e	4.47 ± 1.20	4.24 ± 0.55	5.74 ± 1.13	4.90 ± 0.45	5.02 ± 0.86	5.41 ± 1.13	0.97	0.3313	-	4.92	0.0130	C and FS < FO	-	-	-
Σ n-6^f	40.15 ± 3.06	39.56 ± 2.17	41.37 ± 2.66	43.17 ± 1.65	41.99 ± 1.93	40.66 ± 0.91	3.73	0.0612	-	0.46	0.6380		-	-	-
n-6/n-3	9.33 ± 1.79	9.48 ± 1.30	7.39 +1.17	8.88 ± 1.05	8.54 ± 1.21	7.80 ± 1.56	0.63	0.4316	-	5.76	0.0067	C and FS < FO	-	-	-
C20:4/C18:2	0.30 ± 0.09	0.25 ± 0.06	0.31 ± 0.09	0.32 ± 0.03	0.30 ± 0.07	0.28 ± 0.06	0.47	0.4995	-	0.58	0.5674	-	-	-	-
DHA/C 18:3	16.45 ± 11.13	10.78 ± 3.96	18.48 ± 9.90	19.15 ± 1.95	18.01 ± 7.40	18.55 ± 8.24	1.99	0.1666	-	1.24	0.3023	-	-	-	-
Index of C16 desaturase activity	7.60 ± 1.69	9.20 ± 1.69	7.66 ± 2.51	6.08 ± 0.45	7.40± 1.51	8.47 ± 1.24	1.82	0.1861	-	1.89	0.1661	-	-	-	-
Index of C18 desaturase activity	66.49 ± 5.68	69.53 ± 2.43	63.35 ± 7.11	59.43 ± 2.26	61.66 ± 5.73	64.26 ± 4.19	7.85	0.0083	Neck < Tail	0.92	0.4073	-	3.41	0.0445	Other interactions < Tail*FS
Index of C16 to C18 elongase activity	58.83 ±6.45	58.28 ± 4.42	59.74 ± 2.62	59.12 ± 1.93	59.18 ± 1.68	59.90 ± 1.67	0.24	0.6277	-	0.49	0.6153	-	-	-	-
Atherogenic index	1.03 ± 0.07	1.06 ± 0.07	0.94 ± 0.08	0.92 ± 0.06	0.94 ± 0.06	0.96 ± 0.05	10.66	0.0025	Neck < Tail	2.68	0.0827	-	5.28	0.0101	TailC and Tail FS< Other interactions

Values are expressed as mean (% of total FAME), [Control diet (C): crushed chicken head and dry feed formulated for reptiles (70%/30%), Flax Oil Diet (FO): Control diet + 10% flaxseeds oil, Flax Seed Diet (FS): Control diet + 10% mass crushed flaxseeds] of C. latirostris, Saturated fatty acid (SFA), Unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), Polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), arachidonic acid (AA), linoleic acid (LA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), linolenic acid (ALA).

^a Σ Saturated = C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0.

^b ΣUnsaturated =14:1 cis-9 + 16:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-11+18:1 trans-9+ 18:1 trans-10+ 18:1 trans-11+ C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 18:3 n-3 + 20:3 + 20:4 n-6 + 20:5 n-3 + 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6 + 22:5 n-3 + 22:6 n-3.

^c Σ Monounsaturated = 14:1 cis-9 + 16:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-9+ 18:1 cis-11+18:1 trans-9+ 18:1 trans-10+ 18:1 trans-11

^d Σ Polyunsaturated = C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 18:3 n-3 + 20:3 + 20:4 n-6 + 20:5 n-3 + 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6 + 22:5 n-3 + 22:6 n-3.

^e Σn-3 PUFA = 18:3 n-3 + 20:5 n-3 + 22:5 n-3 + 22:6 n-3.

^f Σn-6 PUFA = C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 20:4 n-6 + 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6.

^g Index of C16 desaturase activity = 100 [(C16:1 cis-9)/(C16:1 cis-9 + C16:0)].

^h Index of C18 desaturase activity = 100 [(C18:1 cis-9)/(C18:1 cis-9 + C18:0)].

ⁱ Index of C16–C18 elongase activity = 100 [(C18:0 + C18:1 cis-9)/(C16:0 + C16:1 cis-9 + C18:0 + C18:1 cis-9)].

^j Atherogenic index = [4(C14:0) + C16:0]/(ΣMUFA + ΣPUFA).

^f Σn-6 PUFA = C18:2 n-6 + C18:3 n-6 + 20:4 n-6 22:4 n-6 + 22:5 n-6.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 20 Nov, 2021

Read the published version in Tropical Animal Health and Production →

Editor assigned by journal
17 Oct, 2021
Editorial decision: Accept as is for publication
28 Sep, 2021
First submitted to journal
19 Jul, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Effect of Flaxseed and Flaxseed Oil Supplemented in Caiman Diet on Meat Fatty Acids

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials And Methods

3. Results

4. Discussion

Declarations

References

Tables

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1