Intra-rectal administration of 4% acetic acid (A-A) is a well-known experimental model to induce acute colitis chemically in mice. A-A simulates mucosal injury and ulcerations, enhances vaso-permeability and neutrophil infiltration and up-regulates inflammatory mediators similarly to those seen in human IBD [19, 20].
NFκB is a transcription factor controlling the transcription of DNA, cytokine production, and cell survival [21, 22]. If there is a defect in the intestinal barrier, bacterial antigens can get access to the antigen-presenting cells (APC) in the intestinal lamina propria [23, 24]. These cells then present the antigens to CD4+ lymphocytes and macrophages that will start the NFκB signaling pathway. Activation of the NFκB signalling pathway results in the release of NFκB from its inhibitory molecules and its nuclear localization, thereby inducing the expression of NFκB target genes [25, 26]. The increased NF-κB expression in the intestinal mucosa results in an increased capacity of these cells to produce and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-13, IL-21, IL-22, IL-6. NFκB is also able to regulate the expression of IL-12 and IL-23 that are directly involved in the mucosal damage typically seen in IBD. NFκB is simultaneously activated by TNF-α thereby providing a kind of positive feedback effect, which maintains the chronicity of the IBD [27, 28].
Sulfasalazine is a well-known drug used in treatment of IBD [29]. Wahl et al. (1998) studied the effect of sulfasalazine on NFκB and found that sulfasalazine can inhibit both activation and nuclear translocation of NFκB in response to three different stimuli (TNF-α, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or phorbol ester). These data suggest that the anti-inflammatory activity of sulfasalazine may rely on its ability to modulate the actions of NFκB signalling [30].
In this study, experimentally-induced colitis led to a significant increase in the expression of the transcription factor, NFκB and the pro-inflammatory marker, TNF-α in the colon of mice as compared to the control group. This is in consistent with study of Schottelius and Baldwin (1999) that pointed out that the increased expression of NFκB is crucial for the initiation and conserving of chronic intestinal inflammation [31]. In the same context, Daneshmand et al. (2009) and Abdel-Daim et al. (2015) concluded that the exaggerated release of TNF-α in A-A model of colitis mediates the intestinal damage observed in IBD [19, 20]. Moreover, in the present study, liraglutide and sitagliptin, either alone or combined to sulfasalazine reduced colonic levels of NF-κB and TNF- α in mice. This can be explained by the ability of GLP-1R agonist to down-regulate NF-κB phosphorylation and nuclear translocation that results in reduction in the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF- α that is influential in IBD pathophysiology [25]. Similarly, DPP-IV inhibitors can partially ameliorate the IBD pathology through increasing the endogenous levels of GLP-1 and GLP-2. Tang et al. (2016) reported that the elevated levels of GLP-1 seen with DPP-IV inhibitors, subsequently suppressed the NF-κB/IκBα set-up that is responsible for NF-κB activation [32]. Furthermore, the correlation between GLP-2 and inflammation was investigated in a study by Xia et al. (2014) that studied the effect of GLP-2 on LPS-induced inflammation in macrophages. GLP-2 was found to inhibit LPS-induced NFκB translocation, IκB-degradation and IκB-α phosphorylation and thus attenuates the inflammatory cascade [33]. Moreover, Broxmeyer et al. (2012) showed that DPP-IV inhibitors have important immunomodulatory actions through the recruitment of immune cells (especially T lymphocytes) and the inhibition of the NFκB-dependent transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines [34].
Lipid peroxidation evidenced by the high MDA level in UC patients is one of the pathogenic mechanisms of UC. Oxidants play an important role in the chronicity of IBD by increasing the number of neutrophils and macrophages that induce a self-sustaining activation loop [35]. It is famed that sulfasalazine and its metabolites are highly effective reactive oxygen metabolite scavengers that decrease MDA levels [36]. On the other hand, cytokines associated with IBD activity (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1 β) stimulate the production of CRP over baseline levels, which are typically less than 1 mg/L [37]. Additionally, Huh et al. (2019) mentioned in a study that evaluated some risk factors and predictors for hospitalization of patients with IBD, that in UC, a serum CRP level > 0.5 mg/dL was the only independent risk factor to predict hospitalization [38]. Therefore, CRP is considered a good predictor of disease remission and response. As shown in Fig. 3C and Fig. 3D, our data demonstrates that Liraglutide, CLS and CSS groups showed significant reduction in MDA levels. While Sitagliptin, CLS and CSS groups decreased the CRP levels in comparison to A-A group with no significant difference than the control group. In a study investigating the effect of liraglutide on peripheral neuropathy in diabetic rats, treatment with liraglutide normalized MDA levels and increased superoxide dismutase level in sciatic nerve [39]. Similarly Varanasi et al. (2012) documented a decline in the mean CRP concentration in patients with T2DM treated with liraglutide [40]. On the other hand, various studies have investigated the anti-oxidant effect of DPP-IV inhibitors. Mega et al. (2011) and Omolekulo et al. (2019) supported the anti-oxidant effect of DPP-IV inhibitors, particularly by sitagliptin in animal models of diabetic nephropathy and insulin resistance respectively that showed significant reduction in plasma MDA levels [41, 42]. While Tremblay et al., (2014) has reported that Sitagliptin, most likely by increasing plasma GLP-1 levels and improving glucose-insulin homeostasis, can down-regulate CRP concentration [43] which may explain the lower CRP levels observed with GLP based therapy [35]. Additionally, several preclinical studies have reinforced the potential anti-inflammatory effects of GLP-1 as regards IBD through regulating invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT) activity, decreasing macrophage propagation, and suppressing lymphocyte maturation and differentiation [44]. In support of these data, Yusta et al. (2015) has reported that GLP-1 receptor agonists can significantly cause a reduction in the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and the interleukins; IL-6, IL-1 β, and IL-2, that are major constituents of the innate immunity and are involved in mucosal repair [45]. Moreover, Anbazhagan et al. (2017) showed that treatment of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis with GLP-1 coated with sterically stabilized phospholipid micelles has significantly ameliorated the progress of colitis with subsequent improvement in the epithelial architecture [46]. In parallel, Bang-Berthelsen et al. (2016) found that liraglutide can improve IBD activity endpoints that include colon length and weight as well as colonic tissues histological changes [8]. Moreover, sitagliptin can potentiate the intestine-tropic effects of the endogenous GLP-2. The later was found to improve the intestinal mucosal tight junctions, decreases the internalization of enteric microbiota and to decrease plasma LPS concentration together with a significant reduction in macrophage migration and the production of oxidative stress markers; iNOS and NADPHox. While lacking of GLP-2 effects was associated with increased liability to gastrointestinal inflammation [47–49]. In the same context, Moran et al. (2012) hypothesized that the reduced activity of DPP-IV enzymes reported in patients with active CD may represent the body’s venture to increase the intestino-trophic and anti-inflammatory effects of endogenous GLP-2 and GLP-1 respectively [50]. Furthermore, in an experimental model of colitis in mice, EMDB-1, a novel DPP IV inhibitor showed remarkable anti-inflammatory effect that may be explained by the upregulation of endogenous GLP-1 and GLP-2 levels [51]. Moreover, Higashijima et al. (2015) has reported that DPP-IV inhibitors can adjust the immune response in a rat model of nephritis by reducing macrophage infiltration [52]. Yazbeck et al. (2010) as well, disclosed that sitagliptin has altered the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-c and IL-6), besides having the ability to regulate the production of TGF-β which modulates immune cells differentiation, maturation, apoptosis and actions [53].
Contrarily Abrahami et al. (2018) suggested a probable alliance between inhibition of DPP-IV enzyme and IBD sequel [54]. However, a meta-analysis carried out by Radz4taaZ`el et al. (2019) has invalidated Abrahami’s findings and pointed out that DPP-IV inhibitors are not correlated with IBD incidence [55], but the need for long-term clinical trials designed to identify the role of DPP-IV inhibitors in IBD is a limitation to end this argument.
Nevertheless, while hypoglycemia is one of the adverse effects reported for sulfasalazine, (possibly through its sulfapyridine component which is structurally similar to glyburide which is a member of the hypoglycemic sulfonylurea group) [56, 57], this study has supported the euoglycemic effect of GLP-1 and DPP-IV based therapy. As liraglutide and sitagliptin are well-known to have a glucose-dependent action, therefore they are essentially well tolerated and are not familiar to cause hypoglycemia unless combined with other oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin [58].