1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002;324(7347):1183.
2. Stoop I, Billiet J, Koch A, Fitzgerald R. Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas. 2012;1:166-70.
3. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(31):1-256.
4. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643-53.
5. Mölenberg FJM, de Vries C, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ. A framework for exploring non-response patterns over time in health surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):37.
6. Morton SM, Bandara DK, Robinson EM, Carr PE. In the 21st Century, what is an acceptable response rate? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36(2):106-8.
7. Blumenberg C, Barros AJD. Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(6):765-73.
8. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(2):Mr000008.
9. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(3):Mr000008.
10. Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5.
11. van Gelder M, Vlenterie R, IntHout J, Engelen L, Vrieling A, van de Belt TH. Most response-inducing strategies do not increase participation in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;99:1-13.
12. Gold N, Durlik C, Sanders JG, Thompson K, Chadborn T. Applying behavioural science to increase uptake of the NHS Health Check: a randomised controlled trial of gain- and loss-framed messaging in the national patient information leaflet. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1519.
13. Sallis A, Bunten A, Bonus A, James A, Chadborn T, Berry D. The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial. BMC Family Practice. 2016;17(1):35.
14. Sweeney M, John P, Sanders M, Wright H, Makinson L. Applying behavioural science to the annual electoral canvass in England: Evidence from a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Electoral Studies. 2021;70:102277.
15. Yokum D, Lauffenburger JC, Ghazinouri R, Choudhry NK. Letters designed with behavioural science increase influenza vaccination in Medicare beneficiaries. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2(10):743-9.
16. Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Metcalfe R, Vlaev I. Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2012;33(1):264-77.
17. Michie S, West R. Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7(1):1-22.
18. Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters G-JY, Mullen PD, Parcel GS, Ruiter RAC, et al. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(3):297-312.
19. Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6(1):1-6.
20. Social Psychology Network. Research Randomizer. [Available from: https://www.randomizer.org/.
21. UK Government. National Statistics: English indices of deprivation 2019 2019 [Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2019.
22. NHS Health Research Authority. Informing participants and seeking consent 2019 [Available from: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/informing-participants-and-seeking-consent/.
23. McBride E, Marlow LAV, Chilcot J, Moss-Morris R, Waller J. Distinct Illness Representation Profiles Are Associated With Anxiety in Women Testing Positive for Human Papillomavirus. Ann Behav Med. 2021.
24. McBride E, Marlow LAV, Forster AS, Ridout D, Kitchener H, Patnick J, et al. Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: The psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(8):2113-21.
25. Brat R. Inference for Proportions: Comparing Two Independent Samples [Available from: https://www.stat.ubc.ca/~rollin/stats/ssize/b2.html.
26. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1987.
27. Lindén-Boström M, Persson C. A selective follow-up study on a public health survey. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(1):152-7.
28. Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prättälä R. 25-year Trends and Socio-demographic Differences in Response Rates: Finnish Adult Health Behaviour Survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):409-15.
29. Søgaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E, Thelle D. The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health. 2004;3(1):3.
30. Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Piha K, Lallukka T. Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212-5.