Top-view SEM images of γ-CuI thin films fabricated by different iodination methods are presented in Fig. 3a-c. AFM images of γ-CuI thin films fabricated by different iodination methods are presented in Fig. 4a-c. The Vis-IR spectra of CuI films prepared through liquid, vapor, and solid iodination methods are shown in Fig. 5a. The photographs for liquid, vapor and solid iodination methods are shown in Fig. 5b. The CuI thin films fabricated by the liquid and vapor iodination methods have both low reflectivity and low transmittance. It can be explained by SEM and AFM images of CuI films. As shown in Fig. 3a and Fig. 4a, the CuI film fabricated by the liquid iodination has a lot of huge and spares grains and roughness surface. When a beam of light irradiates a thin film with many cracks, the light will be scattered and propagate in other directions [25]. Therefore, the transmitted light and the reflected light intensity detected by the detectors are both weak. For this reason, the reflectance and transmittance are both lower as shown in Fig. 5a.
Those factors increase the reflecting and scattering of incoming light and give a milky appearance as shown in Fig. 5b. The CuI film fabricated via the vapor iodination method is slightly better than the liquid method. But the film fabricated by vapor iodination has a rough surface with obvious empty spaces as shown in Fig. 3b,e, and Fig. 4b. Therefore, the film has a frosted-glass-like appearance as shown in Fig. 5b. In contrast, those grains of the CuI film fabricated by the solid iodination are significantly smaller and denser as shown in Fig. 3c,f. Those small and dense grains will lead to a smooth surface as shown in Fig. 4c. The light transmittance of the γ-CuI films fabricated by solid iodination is higher than others due to minimizing incoming light reflecting and scattering by the smooth surface of films. Therefore, the CuI film fabricated by the solid iodination method has both the highest transmittance and strong Fabry–Pérot interference as shown in Fig. 5a.
In addition, pronounced excitonic absorption is visible at EZ1/Z2 = (3.05 ± 0.01) eV. Transitions due to spin-orbit coupling apparent at EZ3 = (3.68 ± 0.01) eV. The Eg of γ-CuI can be calculated by adding EZ1/Z2 to the excitonic binding energy [19,22]. The Eg obtained by those three methods is ~3.10 eV, which is consistent with theoretical calculations and other experimental reported [16,19,24]. The absorption coefficient was calculated by the Beer-Lambert relation

where t is the thickness and T is the transmittance. The spectra of absorption are consistent with the spectra in another report. The applicable condition of the Beer-Lambert relation is a non-scattering system. The films we fabricated via liquid and vapor iodination methods have obvious scattering. Therefore, the α has a significant shift as shown in Fig. 5c.
In this study, the solid-state reaction is used to explain the obvious difference of CuI films prepared by iodization. Generally, the solid-state reaction is divided into two processes: reaction between interface and diffusion of reactive species in the precursor. Jander’s equation is one of the most popular to examine solid-state reaction kinetics under isothermal conditions [33,34]. Its expression is

where α is the conversion rate of reactants, D represents the diffusion coefficient, c0 represents the reactant concentration at the interface between the layer of reaction products and the reactant, t represents the time and r is the spherical reactant particles’ radius.
A diagram of the growth of the CuI grains basing on Jander’s equation and intuitive results was proposed as illustrated in Fig. 6. Compared with the solid iodization method, the liquid and vapor iodination methods have many iodine molecules in contact with the Cu3N precursors, which makes the interface reaction area larger. Meanwhile, iodine aqueous solution and iodine vapor have lower concentrations at the reaction interface than solid iodine particles, which makes all reactions slower. Each contact point reacts with the precursor at the same time, so that there is already a layer of CuI on Cu3N grains as shown in Fig. 6a. When the outer “shell” of the grain was formed, the process of further diffusion-reaction is the iodination reaction inside the precursor. Therefore, the CuI film has coarser grains. The coarse grains can cause empty spaces as shown in Figure 3a,b. On the contrary, the CuI film fabricated by solid iodination has small grains instead of shell layers due to the few contact area between the iodine solid particles and the Cu3N film as shown in Fig. 5b. The iodination process of non-contact points grows freely with the diffusion of iodine atoms without the influence of the CuI “shell” layer, so the grains are smaller. Fortunately, the arbitrarily distributed small grains make the film more compact.
3.2. A New Strategy
Based on the above analysis, we infer the key factor to improve the transmittance of CuI films is to reduce the grain size to form a denser film structure with a smooth surface. A denser film structure with a smooth surface can reduce the light scattering of CuI films. The effect of solid iodization is the best among the three iodization methods, and the details of solid iodization are studied.
When iodine particles contact with Cu3N precursor, they can be divided into contact areas and non-contact areas. Therefore, what are the similarities and differences between the two regions? The schematic diagram of Fig. 7a,b shows the preparation process of two cases. The contact area is prepared by completely covering the iodine powder. The iodine particles are placed on the edge of the precursor for iodization, and the middle area is the non-contact iodization area. The γ-CuI films fabricated by iodine particles contact iodination are smooth as shown in Fig. 7b,e. The root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the 10 × 10 μm2 scanned area was 9.8 nm. In contrast, the non-contact iodization areas of γ-CuI films have different surface morphology as shown in Fig. 7c. The root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of the 10 × 10 μm2 scanned area was 27.1 nm. This can also be explained by the above analysis of solid-state reaction. As shown in Fig. 7d, the non-contact iodization area γ-CuI films have a frosted-glass-like appearance and a low transmittance (73%) due to small uneven grains on the substrate in the no-contact area, which is consistent with a previous report [25]. But the CuI grains generated in the contact area are very flat. Its average transmittance is as high as 85%. In other words, the reaction between the iodine solid particles and the Cu3N precursor in the contact interface (contact iodination area) between solid-state iodine and Cu3N precursor (noted as step1) is smoother than the reaction due to the diffusion (non-contact iodination area) of reactive species in the Cu3N precursor (noted as step2). Therefore, the transmittance of step1 is higher than step2.
Improving film smoothness and grain density can reduce light scattering, and then increasing the transmittance of films and eliminating the frosted-glass-like appearance of the film. It has been reported that a high smooth surface will make the reflectivity too high and reduce the transmittance [25,35] so that the transmittance of CuI film obtained by solid iodization is only about 70% [25]. In this study, it is found that reflection has no obvious effect on CuI films prepared by solid iodination. This study proposed films with different roughness area distributions and selected three representative films for analysis.
Fig. 8a shows the schematic three arrangements and their scattering, green represents contact areas, gray represents the non-contact area. According to the haze and interference of prepared film, the distribution of the two areas of a sample is visible. Fig. 8b shows the transmittance and reflectivity of three arrangements. Fig. 8c shows the visible transmittance and haze of those films. Fig. 8d shows the Lab color of those films. The negative value of the ‘a’ axis tends to green, and the positive value tends to red. The negative value of the ‘b’ axis tends to be blue, and the positive value tends to be yellow. When the distribution of smooth area is denser, the surface of CuI film is so smooth. The film has obvious Fabry Perot interference due to smooth surface as shown in Fig. 8b. The CIELab color values of a and b are less than 10 as shown in Fig. 8d. It indicates that the interference color does not affect its application as the transparent conductive film. In the visible region, CuI film has high transmittance and low haze due to the light scattering of the film is low. Although the reflectivity is slightly higher than other CuI films, the transmittance is still as high as 85%. When the uneven area is density, the CuI film has a high haze and low transmittance due to the rough surface of the CuI film. The haze is linearly correlated with the transmittance as shown in Fig. 8c. Therefore, the film with a smooth surface can be prepared by controlling the density of the contact area.
Different devices require different haze on the electrode. For example, the touch-panel displays require low haze transparent electrodes [36-38], but solar cells need transparent electrodes with high haze to improve light utilization [39-41]. Therefore, this strategy also can modify the haze of CuI film from 0.7% to 21% to meet the needs of different electronic devices. That will greatly expand the application of CuI as transparent conductive films.
3.3. Photoelectric performance of p-type TCs
Quantitatively, the overall photoelectric performance of the TC can be quantified by the Haacke figure of merit (FOM) [42], ΦTC = T10/Rs where T is the average transmittance in the visible region and Rs is the sheet resistance. A larger value of FOM indicates the better photoelectric performance of the TC. As shown in Table 1, the FOM of most novel p-type TCs is lower than 20 MΩ-1. In contrast, the as-deposited γ-CuI film shows a FOM about 11× higher, up to 233 MΩ-1, while providing a high Tvis above 86%. These results demonstrate the superior TC photoelectric performance of our γ-CuI films with respect to all measures.
Table 1. Transmittance, resistivity, and the FOM of CuI films and other p-type TCs
Materials
|
d
(nm)
|
σ
(S/cm)
|
Rs
(kΩ/sq)
|
Tvis
(%)
|
FOM
(MΩ-1)
|
Referece
|
Ca3Co4O9
|
100
|
18
|
5.5
|
31.3
|
0.0015
|
[43]
|
GaN: Mg
|
100
|
5.3
|
19
|
70
|
1.487
|
[44]
|
SnO
|
200
|
0.77
|
650
|
85
|
3.03
|
[45]
|
MgxCr2-xO3
|
150
|
0.333
|
200
|
65
|
0.067
|
[46]
|
La2/3Sr1/3VO3
|
24
|
816.3
|
0.51
|
61.1
|
14.21
|
[14]
|
CuAlO2
|
230
|
0.34
|
130
|
70
|
0.217
|
[12]
|
CuGaO2
|
100
|
0.02
|
5000
|
80
|
0.022
|
[6]
|
CuCrO2
|
180
|
0.19
|
292.4
|
58.3
|
0.015
|
[8]
|
CuScO2+x
|
110
|
15
|
6.06
|
40
|
0.0173
|
[10]
|
CuCrO2: Mg
|
50
|
1.55
|
129
|
49.81
|
0.123
|
[11]
|
CuI
|
230
|
45
|
0.95
|
86
|
233
|
This work
|
Figure 9 shows the transmittance, conductivity, and FOM values of CuI films prepared by the new strategy and other methods. The films prepared by the new strategy have better performance than other CuI films. Compared with other preparation methods, this new strategy is simple and controllable. Moreover, the haze can be adjusted from 0.7% to 22%. This expands the application range of CuI as the transparent conductive film.