1.Tuncalp, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gulmezoglu AM, Bahl R, Daelmans B, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns - the WHO vision. BJOG 2015, 122(8):1045–1049.
2.Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comande D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet 2016, 388(10056):2176–2192.
3.Duysburgh E, Zhang WH, Ye M, Williams A, Massawe S, Sie A, et al. Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in selected rural health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania: similar finding. Trop Med Int Health 2013, 18(5):534–547.
4.Sharma G, Powell-Jackson T, Haldar K, Bradley J, Filippi V. Quality of routine essential care during childbirth: clinical observations of uncomplicated births in Uttar Pradesh, India. Bull World Health Organ 2017, 95(6):419–429.
5.Fisseha G, Berhane Y, Worku A, Terefe W. Quality of the delivery services in health facilities in Northern Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res 2017, 17(1):187.
6.Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman LP. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan 2014:1–8.
7.World Health Organization Representative Office Philippines. Essential Intrapartum and Newborn Care (EINC) Evidence-based Standard Practices. http://origin.wpro.who.int/philippines/areas/maternal_child_nutrition/newborn_mother_care/einc_protocols/en/ Accessed 14 April 2018.
8.World Health Organization. Second biennial progress report: 2016–2017 (Action Plan for Health Newborn Infants in the Western Pacific Region: 2014–2020). Manila: World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2018.
9.Silvestre MAA, Mannava P, Corsino MA, Capili DS, Calibo AP, Tan CF, et al. Improving immediate newborn care practices in Philippine hospitals: impact of a national quality of care initiative 2008–2015. Int J Qual Health Care 2018, 30(7):537–544.
10.World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
11.Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. California: SAGE Publications; 2009.
12.Bernard HR: Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press; 2006..
13.Kc A, Wrammert J, Clark RB, Ewald U, Malqvist M. Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16:233.
14.Department of Health, Philippine Obstetrical and Gynecological Society. Clinical practice guidelines on intrapartum and immediate postpartum care. Manila: Department of Health; 2012.
15.World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
16.Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev 2009, 1:CD000081.
17.Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev 2017, 2:CD000081.
18.Al-Ghammari K, Al-Riyami Z, Al-Moqbali M, Al-Marjabi F, Al-Mahrouqi B, Al-Khatri A, et al. Predictors of routine episiotomy in primigravida women in Oman. Appl Nurs Res 2016, 29:131–135.
19.Schantz C, Sim KL, Ly EM, Barennes H, Sudaroth S, Goyet S. Reasons for routine episiotomy: A mixed-methods study in a large maternity hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Reprod Health Matters 2015, 23(45):68–77.
20.Trinh AT, Roberts CL, Ampt AJ. Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15:101.
21.Saadia Z. Rates and Indicators for Episiotomy in Modern Obstetrics - a study from Saudi Arabia. Mater Sociomed 2014, 26(3):188–190.
22.Ballesteros-Meseguer C, Carrillo-Garcia C, Meseguer-de-Pedro M, Canteras-Jordana M, Martinez-Roche ME. Episiotomy and its relationship to various clinical variables that influence its performance. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2016, 24:e2793.
23.Hussein SA, Dahlen HG, Duff M, Schmied V. The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan. Women Birth 2016, 29(4):321–329.
24.Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Hospital-based lateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates: a retrospective population-based register study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 206(4):347 e341–346.
25.Lund NS, Persson LK, Jango H, Gommesen D, Westergaard HB. Episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery affects the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J of Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016, 207:193–199.
26.Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP, Cuthbert A, Singata M. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour. Cochrane Satabase Syst Rev 2017, 3:CD006067.
27.Matsuo K, Shiki Y, Yamasaki M, Shimoya K. Use of uterine fundal pressure maneuver at vaginal delivery and risk of severe perineal laceration. Arch Gyneco Obstet 2009, 280(5):781–786.
28.Moiety FM, Azzam AZ. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labor in a tertiary obstetric center: a prospective analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014, 40(4):946–953.
29.Sturzenegger K, Schaffer L, Zimmermann R, Haslinger C. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure. J Perinat Med 2017, 45(3):309–313.
30.Balde MD, Diallo BA, Bangoura A, Sall O, Soumah AM, Vogel JP, et al. Perceptions and experiences of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities in Guinea: a qualitative study with women and service providers. Reprod Health 2017, 14(1):3.
31.Cabral E: The Philippine Health Agenda for 2016 to 2022. Phil J Int Med 2016, 54(2):1–11.
32.Philippines Health Insurance Corporation. Annual report 2017. Manila: Philippines Health Insurance Corporation; 2018.
33.Blondel B, Alexander S, Bjarnadottir RI, Gissler M, Langhoff-Roos J, Novak-Antolic Z, et al. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016, 95(7):746–754.
34.Hirayama F, Koyanagi A, Mori R, Zhang J, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM. Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study. BJOG 2012, 119(3):340–347.
35.Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014, 125(1):6–14.
36.Mahgoub S, Piant H, Gaudineau A, Lefebvre F, Langer B, Koch A. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and the role of episiotomy: A retrospective series of 496 cases. J Gyneco Obstet Hum Reprod 2019, 48(8):657–662.
37.Keriakos R, Gopinath D. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries. J Acute Dis 2015, 4(4):259–265.
38.Preston HL, Fowler GE. Risk factors for and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 2016, 26(3):65–71.
39.Kudish B, Blackwell S, McNeeley SG, Bujold E, Kruger M, Hendrix SL, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006, 195(3):749–754.
40.Raisanen SH, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009, 88(12):1365–1372.
41.Kataoka Y, Eto H, Iida M. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. Midwifery 2013, 29(8):965–972.
42.Suto M, Takehara K, Misago C, Matsui M. Prevalence of perineal lacerations in women giving birth at midwife-led birth centers in Japan: a retrospective descriptive study. J Midwifery Women Health 2015, 60(4):419–427.
43.Oswald D, Sherratt F, Smith S. Handling the Hawthorne effect: The challanges surrongind a participant observer. Rev Soc Stud 2014, 1(1):53–73.
44.Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, Medves JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth 2005, 32(3):219–223.
45.Kawulich BB: Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitat Soc Res 2005, 6(2):43.