Association Between Social Support and Postpartum Depression

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-753172/v1

Abstract

Introduction:

Postpartum depression is common; however, little is known about its relationship to social support and postpartum depression. This study examined the association between them among South Korean women within one year of childbirth.

Methods

This study was based on the 2016 Korean Study of Women’s Health-Related Issues (K-Stori), a cross-sectional survey employing nationally-representative random sampling. Participants were 1,654 postpartum women within a year of giving birth. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were conducted to analyze the associations between social support (and other covariates) and postpartum depression.

Results

Among participants, 266 (16.1%) had postpartum depression. Depending on the level of social support, 6.0%, 53.9%, and 40.1% of them had low, moderate, and high social support, respectively. Women with moderate or low social support were more likely to have postpartum depression (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.26–2.53; OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.56–4.89). This trend was observed in participants with multiparity, pregnancy loss, obese body image, and employed women.

Conclusion

Social support was associated with a decreased likelihood of postpartum depression, indicating the importance of social support, especially for women with multiparity, pregnancy loss experience, negative body image, and employed women for preventing postpartum depression.

Introduction

One of the most important turning points in a woman’s life is pregnancy and childbirth.[1] Women at the prenatal and postpartum periods commonly experience mental health problems because of new roles and responsibilities.[2] The onset of mental health problems can cause devastation and dissension in a woman’s life.[3] Depression is estimated to be the second leading cause of disability by 2020.[4] It is a common and debilitating psychiatric disorder prevalent in South Korea and worldwide.[5, 6] Incidence of depression is approximately two times higher in women than in men, and is particularly common among women of child-bearing age.[7] In Korea, social burden due to mental disorders have significantly increased. The proportion of those who suffered from mental disorders at least once in their lifetime was 30.2% in 2006 and 27.6% in 2011.[8] The consequences of depression during the postpartum period are considerably more deleterious because a woman faces the added responsibility of caring for her newborn infant.[3]

Postpartum affective depression is typically divided into three categories: postpartum blues, postpartum depression (PPD), and puerperal psychosis. Postpartum blues have been reported to occur in 15–85% of women within the first 10 days after giving birth.[9] Although postpartum blues is a common and transient occurrence, its recognition is important because it is a risk factor for subsequent PPD.[9, 10] Puerperal psychosis is the most severe and uncommon form of postnatal affective illness, with a rate of 1–2 episodes per 1,000 deliveries. The symptoms of puerperal psychosis differ from PPD as it comprises delusions, hallucinations, confusion, perplexity, or mania or mixed features.

PPD is the most common complication of childbearing, affecting approximately 10–22% of woman in childbearing age.[11] Women usually experience PPD within the first six weeks following delivery, and recover from it six months postpartum; however, it may continue through the first and second years postpartum.[12] PPD is closely linked with negative outcomes for women and infants, such as maternal suicide, weak maternal interaction with her infant, early termination of breastfeeding, and delays in children’s development.[13, 14] Although PPD is undetected or inadequately treated, it may be remedied by both behavioral and pharmacological treatments.[15] However, studies have found out that pharmacological therapy was unsuitable for postpartum mothers, particularly those who wished to breastfeed, as antidepressant compounds may be passed onto the infant via breastmilk.[16, 17] Thus, prevention is the best method against the onset of depression in new mothers rather than relying on these treatments. While the cause of PPD remains unclear, social support has been shown to be effective in helping women cope with postpartum depression.[18, 19] Social support is defined as an exchange of resources among people perceived by the provider or recipient to be intended to improve the lifestyle of the recipient.[20]

Previous studies have investigated the relationship between PPD and social support.[2, 13, 18] However, there was relatively little consideration for factors affecting social support and postpartum depression. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of PPD in postpartum women in South Korea and investigate the relationship between PPD and social support.

Results

A total of 1,654 postpartum women were included in the analysis, of which 266 (16.1%) had PPD and 1,388 (83.9%) did not. The demographic and health characteristics of the study participants were summarised in Table 1. Statistically significant differences were observed between social support and having PPD. There were more women with PPDs in groups with low social support. Additionally, there were differences in education level, household income, current employment status, current breastfeeding status, degree of parenting burden within the last month, subjective health status, perceived body image, stress, past diagnosis of depression, and smoking experience between women with and without PPD.

Table 2 shows social support status among participants: 6.0% of women had low, 53.9% had moderate and 40.1% had high social support. Women with lower levels of social support were significantly more likely to have lower education and income levels, job, abortion experience, higher parenting burden, lower subjective health status, higher stress levels, and depression compared with women with moderate or higher supports.

Univariate and multiple logistic regression were conducted to determine the association between PPD and social support while controlling for potential covariates (Table 3). In univariable logistic regression analyses, the women with moderate (OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.93–3.67) and low (OR = 6.89, 95% CI = 4.22–11.24) level of social supports had increased likelihood for PPD compared to women with high level of social support. Further, in multivariable logistic regression analyses, women with moderate and low social support levels were 1.78 (95% CI = 1.25–2.52) and 2.73 (95% CI = 1.54–4.83) times more likely to develop PPD, respectively, compared to the women with high social support levels. Furthermore, there was a significant association of PPD in women with jobs (OR = 2.80, 95% CI = 2.02–3.88), breastfeeding women (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.10–2.01), and those diagnosed with depression (OR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.34–5.78). Regarding degree of parenting burden, women with moderate and high parenting burden reported 5.10 (95% CI = 2.66–9.98) and 10.09 (95% CI = 5.08–20.04) times higher chances of having PPD, respectively, compared to the women with low level of parenting burden. Also, women with moderate and low subjective health status were 1.48 (95% CI = 1.07–2.05) and 5.41 (95% CI = 2.83–10.36) times more likely to develop PPD, respectively. Women with moderate (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.32–3.95) and higher (OR = 4.76, 95% CI = 2.58–8.79) levels of stress were also more likely to develop PPD. Interestingly, those with higher household income level reported less likelihood of PPD (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27–0.90).

The results of subgroup analyses on social support awareness and PPD with covariates were summarised in Table 4. Among women with multiparity, those with moderate and low levels of social support were 2.85 (95% CI = 1.68–4.82) and 4.90 (95% CI = 2.14–11.23) times more likely to develop PPD, respectively; but there were no statistical differences in women with primiparity. Further, in case of women who have pregnancy loss experience compared to those with no experience, the lower the social support, the greater the odds ratios of PPD. In women with pregnancy loss experience, the odds ratios of PPD were 10.26 times higher in such women with low social supports (low: OR = 10.26, 95% CI = 2.16–48.73). Women with moderate and low levels of social support who reported their body image as normal or obese were more likely to develop PPD (P value for trend < 0.001). In addition, women with jobs and low levels of social support showed the highest likelihood of PPD (OR = 10.34, 95% CI = 2.34–45.64).

Figure 1 presents the relationship between the level of social support in each scale of the development of PPD, and shows that the lower the social support level in all subscales, the higher the odds ratios of PPD. The results showed a high degree of association in order of family, significant others, and friends.

Discussion

The World Health Organization (WHO) noted that mental health problems such as depression and anxiety are common during pregnancy and after childbirth.[21] However, there was limited information on which women develop PPD. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the associated factors of PPD, especially how social support affects depression in postpartum women. Our findings show that postpartum women with low social support had 4.63-fold higher odds of PPD compared with postpartum women with high social support. Further, women who are employed or breastfeeding, or have heavy parenting burden, poor subjective health status, high stress level, and were diagnosed with depression in the past were more likely to develop PPD. Furthermore, this study also showed that higher levels of social support may buffer against probability of PPD after adjusting for confounding variables. Given our results, postpartum women need a high level of social support from family, close friends, and significant others.

Interestingly, the subgroup analysis showed that women with multiparity had a five times higher risk of PPD if their social support was low. Multiparity could increase the level of maternal stress and depression because women need to also care for their previous children and infants. Women with multiparity may not receive the same level of social support as they received during their first time of childbearing because they are considered to be child-care experts despite their need of extra social support to take care of their new-born babies. Thus, the results suggest that as women with multiparity are more likely to have PPD, better social support is needed for preventing PPD.[22]

Another interesting finding in the current study is that women with low social support and previous experience of pregnancy loss were 10 times more likely to develop PPD. Our result is in line with previous studies in which previous pregnancy loss served as an effect modifier between social support and PPD. Pregnancy loss is an event which makes the bereaved women particularly prone to depression, mood disorders, dramatic mental health disorder, and even suicide.[23] According to previous research, women who have lost their babies were seven to nine times more vulnerable to depression than women without a pregnancy loss.[24] These results indicate that postpartum women with history of pregnancy loss needs higher level of social support to prevent PPD.

Body image also acts as an effect modifier between social support and PPD. Like adolescence, the period surrounding childbirth is accompanied by unique and rapid changes in not only body shape and size but also psychological dimensions. Prior studies suggested that about 85% of women during pregnancy experience body image dissatisfaction.[25] In recent years, increasing numbers of women reported to be concerned about their weight gain and appearance during pregnancy and postpartum period.[26, 27] Body image may influence depression and health behaviours in postpartum women.[28] The current study results suggest that social support is an important factor that improves mental health of women with negative body image during postpartum period.

Many countries have implemented paid leave to help working parents.[29] Despite policies like paid leaves, women continue to work for reasons such as career, worried about losing jobs, financial burden, and negative attitudes in the workplace. Women with dual roles of having a job and childbearing are especially vulnerable to PPD.[30] Similarly, the current study results showed that women who have a job were 2.8 times more likely to develop PPD. Job strain often cannot be decreased or relieved, but social support in workplace can buffer the negative effect of overwork, and role ambiguity.[30, 31] In addition to workplace support, social support from partner, family, and friends also decrease job stress in postpartum women.[32]

The strength of the study is that the findings are based on a nationwide survey, making the data representative of Korean women and comprehensively assessed depressive symptoms of the postpartum period.

Limitations

Several limitations to the present study could influence the interpretation of our findings. First, the cross-sectional design of K-stori could not show the direction of the causal relationship for the identified association between social support and PPD. Second, this study primarily relied on self-report measures from K-stori. Thus, questions on the dependent and other independent variables may contribute to recall bias. Third, depression was measured based on a self-report. Previous research has shown that self-reported survey can be under or overestimated depending on individual characteristics. Though all responses were anonymous, some individuals may not indicate their true levels of depression.[33]

This study provided a cross-sectional estimate of PPD within one year of childbirth in South Korean women. Social support was also positively associated with a lower likelihood of PPD in women with multiparity, pregnancy loss experience, negative body image, and jobs. Postpartum women should receive a high level of social support from family, friends, and significant others to prevent PPD and improve their maternal health, aided by health professionals.

Methods

Study population

This cross-sectional study was based on the Korean Study of Women’s Health-Related Issues (K-Stori) in 2016. It was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center, Korea (Approval no: NCC2016-0062). The K-Stori is a nationwide survey designed to investigate a broad area of health issues among Korean women according to five stages in the life cycle of a woman (adolescence: 14–17 years; childbearing: 19–44 years; pregnancy and postpartum: 19–44 years; menopause: 45–64 years; and old adulthood: 65–79 years).[34] The participants of this study were women within a year of giving birth. From the total pregnant and postpartum women (n = 3000), pregnant women (n = 1,346) were excluded, and thus 1,654 women aged 19–44 years were included in the study. To recruit the participants, the interviewers planned to visit obstetrics and gynecology or post-partum care centers. In order to select the same survey area as the other life cycle stages, a systematic data extraction method was used to identify local obstetrician and post-partum care centers for pregnant and post-partum women based on the same sample design area for the household survey participants. All study participants provided informed consent.

Measures

The main outcome variable of this study was PPD, which was evaluated using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).[35] The EPDS is a validated 10 questions screening tool, and is the most widely used screening questionnaire asking mothers how they have felt in the past seven days for PPD (Appendix 1). Participants answered the questionnaires and the answers were scored from 0–3 points (or 3–0 in case of a reverse score) with a total score of 0 to 30. A threshold score of ⪰10 was used to classify postpartum women with a probable major depression who needed further medical examination.[35]

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) was used to measure individual perceived social supports from three sources: friends (Item 6, 7, 9, and 12), family (Item 3, 4, 8, and 11) and significant others (Item 1, 2, 5, and 10).[36] Participants were asked to indicate their agreement with the statements on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = very strongly disagree to 4 = very strongly agree. The total score was calculated as the mean of 12 scores and the subscale total scores were the sum of the scores for the four questions related to the subscale. Total scores ranging from 12 to 24 were classified as low social support, from 25 to 36 as moderate social support and from 37 to 48 as high social support.

Further, information on age, living area, education level, household income, current job, number of parities, pregnancy loss experience, current breastfeeding status, degree of parenting burden within the last month, subjective health status, perceived body image, stress, past diagnosis of depression, and smoking experience was collected.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive analysis was conducted to compare the characteristics of study participants according to postpartum depression level. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association between PPD and social support while controlling for potential covariates. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of having PPD were estimated. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the influence of social support on the risk of having PPD according to groups with different characteristics. In the subgroup analyses, the Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess the association between PPD and each variable and the awareness of nutrition labelling. P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA). This study was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Declarations

Acknowledgements: This study was funded by the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Grant number: 2015ER630300), and a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research and Control from the National Cancer Center, Korea (#1910231). 

Authors’ contributions: All authors were involved in the study conception and design. All authors were involved in the study conception and design. HC and KL contributed to drafting and writing the manuscript. HNC, EC, and BP contributed to participate in the initial design of the study and revising the article. MS contributed to revising the article and statistical methodology. HC, YR, and KSC contributed to editing, reviewing, and final approval of article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information: Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.S.C

References

  1. Gingnell, M. et al. Emotional anticipation after delivery–a longitudinal neuroimaging study of the postpartum period. Scientific reports, 7, 1–6 (2017).
  2. Gao, L., Chan, S. W. & Mao, Q. Depression, perceived stress, and social support among first-time Chinese mothers and fathers in the postpartum period. Research in nursing & health, 32, 50–58 (2009).
  3. Misri, S., Kostaras, X., Fox, D. & Kostaras, D. The impact of partner support in the treatment of postpartum depression. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 554–558 (2000).
  4. Matinnia, N., Ghaleiha, A., Jahangard, L. & Farahmand, E. Psychological Risk Factors for Postnatal Depression: A Prospective Study of Iranian Low Income Primigravidae at Health Care Centres.Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities26 (2018).
  5. Husain, N. et al. Social stress and depression during pregnancy and in the postnatal period in British Pakistani mothers: a cohort study. Journal of affective disorders, 140, 268–276 (2012).
  6. Kim, H. S. & Park, K. J. Latent growth model of maternal depressive symptoms: Predictors and effects on infant’s developmental outcomes. Child Studies in Asia-Pacific Contexts, 4, 27–45 (2014).
  7. Andersson, L., Sundström-Poromaa, I., Wulff, M., Åström, M. & Bixo, M. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy and six months postpartum: a follow-up study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 85, 937–944 (2006).
  8. Cho, M. et al. The epidemiological survey of mental disorders in Korea 2011 (Ministry of Health and Welfare Academic Research Services Business Report, 2011).
  9. Pearlstein, T., Howard, M., Salisbury, A. & Zlotnick, C. Postpartum depression. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 200, 357–364 (2009).
  10. Reck, C., Stehle, E., Reinig, K. & Mundt, C. Maternity blues as a predictor of DSM-IV depression and anxiety disorders in the first three months postpartum. Journal of Affective Disorders, 113, 77–87 (2009).
  11. McCurdy, A. P., Boulé, N. G., Sivak, A. & Davenport, M. H. Effects of exercise on mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms in the postpartum period: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129, 1087–1097 (2017).
  12. Cornish, A. M. et al. Postnatal depression and infant cognitive and motor development in the second postnatal year: The impact of depression chronicity and infant gender. Infant behavior and development, 28, 407–417 (2005).
  13. Morikawa, M. et al. Relationship between social support during pregnancy and postpartum depressive state: a prospective cohort study. Scientific reports, 5, 1–9 (2015).
  14. Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Tomlinson, M., Le Roux, I. & Stein, J. A. Alcohol use, partner violence, and depression: a cluster randomized controlled trial among urban South African mothers over 3 years. American journal of preventive medicine, 49, 715–725 (2015).
  15. Horowitz, J. A. & Goodman, J. H. Identifying and treating postpartum depression. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 34, 264–273 (2005).
  16. Weissman, A. M. et al. Pooled analysis of antidepressant levels in lactating mothers, breast milk, and nursing infants. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1066–1078 (2004).
  17. Stephens, S., Ford, E., Paudyal, P. & Smith, H. Effectiveness of psychological interventions for postnatal depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. The Annals of Family Medicine, 14, 463–472 (2016).
  18. Howell, E. A. et al. Reducing postpartum depressive symptoms among black and Latina mothers: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and gynecology, 119, 942 (2012).
  19. Ohara, M. et al. Social support helps protect against perinatal bonding failure and depression among mothers: a prospective cohort study. Scientific reports, 7, 1–8 (2017).
  20. Chen, C. M., Kuo, S. F., Chou, Y. H. & Chen, H. C. Postpartum Taiwanese women: their postpartum depression, social support and health-promoting lifestyle profiles. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 1550–1560 (2007).
  21. Surkan, P. J., Patel, S. A. & Rahman, A. Preventing infant and child morbidity and mortality due to maternal depression. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 36, 156–168 (2016).
  22. Zaidi, F., Nigam, A., Anjum, R. & Agarwalla, R. Postpartum depression in women: a risk factor analysis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: Jcdr, 11, QC13 (2017).
  23. Cacciatore, J. in Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 76–82 (Elsevier).
  24. Vance, J. C. et al. Early parental responses to sudden infant death, stillbirth or neonatal death. Medical Journal of Australia, 155, 292–297 (1991).
  25. Hicks, S. & Brown, A. Higher Facebook use predicts greater body image dissatisfaction during pregnancy: The role of self-comparison. Midwifery, 40, 132–140 (2016).
  26. Skouteris, H. Body image issues in obstetrics and gynecology(2011).
  27. Oken, E., Taveras, E. M., Popoola, F. A., Rich-Edwards, J. W. & Gillman, M. W. Television, walking, and diet: associations with postpartum weight retention. American journal of preventive medicine, 32, 305–311 (2007).
  28. Lancaster, C. A. et al. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 202, 5–14 (2010).
  29. Kim, E. J. The Relationship between Female Education and Total Fertility Rate, and the Role of Paid Leave Entitlements Available to Mothers. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 28, 361–382 (2020).
  30. McGovern, P. et al. Mothers’ health and work-related factors at 11 weeks postpartum. The Annals of Family Medicine, 5, 519–527 (2007).
  31. McGovern, P. et al. Postpartum health of employed mothers 5 weeks after childbirth. The Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 159–167 (2006).
  32. Munro, L., Rodwell, J. & Harding, L. Assessing occupational stress in psychiatric nurses using the full job strain model: the value of social support to nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 35, 339–345 (1998).
  33. Kalibatseva, Z., Lyke, J. & Martino, S. Are “Superwomen" without social support at risk for postpartum depression and anxiety?Molly S. Arnold Stockton University.
  34. Choi, E. et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in obesity among Korean women aged 19–79 years: the 2016 Korean Study of Women’s Health-Related Issues.Epidemiology and health41 (2019).
  35. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M. & Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British journal of psychiatry, 150, 782–786 (1987).
  36. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G. & Farley, G. K. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment, 52, 30–41 (1988).

Tables

 
Table 1
General characteristics of the study population afflicted by postpartum depression in this study
Variables
Postpartum depression
P-value
Total
Yes
No
N
%
N
%
N
%
Total
1,654
100.0
266
16.1
1,388
83.9
 
Social supporta
High
663
40.1
55
8.3
608
91.7
< .0001
Moderate
892
53.9
173
19.4
719
80.6
 
Low
99
6.0
38
38.4
61
61.6
 
Age (in years)
19–29
255
15.4
41
16.1
214
83.9
0.5318
30–39
1,231
74.4
203
16.5
1,028
83.5
 
40–44
168
10.2
22
13.1
146
86.9
 
Region
Urban area
1,347
81.4
217
16.1
1,130
83.9
0.9489
Rural area
307
18.6
49
16.0
258
84.0
 
Education level
≤High school
387
23.4
79
20.4
308
79.6
0.008
≥College
1,267
76.6
187
14.8
1,080
85.2
 
Household income
< 3,000$/month
417
25.2
92
22.1
325
77.9
0.0005
3,000–4,999$/month
1,064
64.3
152
14.3
912
85.7
 
≥ 5,000$/month
173
10.46
22
12.72
151
87.28
 
Current job
No
1,255
75.9
163
13.0
1,092
87.0
< .0001
Yes
399
24.1
103
25.8
163
74.2
 
Parity
Primipara
645
39.0
98
15.2
547
84.8
0.4317
Multipara
1,009
61.0
168
16.7
841
83.3
 
Pregnancy loss experience
None
1,301
78.7
212
16.3
1,089
83.7
0.6509
Had
353
21.3
54
15.3
299
84.7
 
Current breastfeeding
Yes
866
52.4
116
13.4
750
86.6
0.0018
No
788
47.6
150
19.0
638
81.0
 
Degree of parenting burden within the last month
Low
363
21.9
11
3.0
352
97.0
0.1926
Moderate
949
57.4
159
16.8
790
83.2
 
High
342
20.7
96
28.1
246
71.9
 
Subjective health status
High
1,162
70.2
140
12.1
1,022
87.9
< .0001
Moderate
435
26.3
94
21.6
341
78.4
 
Low
57
3.5
32
56.1
25
43.9
 
Perceived body image
Underweight
86
5.2
19
22.1
67
77.9
0.0114
Normal
885
53.5
121
7.3
764
86.3
 
Obese
683
41.3
126
18.5
557
81.5
 
Stress level
Low
292
17.7
17
5.8
275
94.2
< .0001
Moderate
1,136
68.7
168
14.8
968
85.2
 
High
226
13.6
81
35.8
145
64.2
 
Past diagnosis of depression
None
1,611
97.4
26
1.9
1,362
8.5
< .0001
Had
43
2.6
17
6.4
249
93.6
 
Drinking alcohol during pregnancy
None
1,252
75.7
193
15.4
1,059
84.6
0.1926
Had
402
24.3
73
18.2
329
81.8
 
Smoking experience
None
1,596
96.5
248
15.5
1,348
84.5
0.0016
Had
58
3.5
18
31.0
40
69.0
 

aSocial support: Total Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) score range from 12-24 (low), 25-36(moderate), 37-48 (high)

 
Table 2
General characteristics of the study population by social support in this study
Variables
Social support
p-value
Total
Low
Moderate
High
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Total
 
1,654
100.0
99
6.0
892
53.9
663
40.1
 
Postpartum depression
Yes
266
16.1
38
14.3
173
65.0
55
20.7
< .0001
No
1,388
83.9
61
4.4
52
51.8
608
43.8
 
Age (in years)
19–29
255
15.4
17
6.7
136
53.3
102
40.0
0.6739
30–39
1,231
74.4
68
5.5
667
54.2
496
40.3
 
40–44
168
10.2
14
8.3
89
53.0
65
38.7
 
Region
Urban area
1,347
81.4
76
5.6
735
54.6
536
39.8
0.3451
Rural area
307
18.6
23
7.5
157
51.1
127
41.4
 
Education level
≤High school
387
23.4
36
9.3
224
57.9
127
32.8
0.0002
≥College
1,267
76.6
63
5.0
668
52.7
536
42.3
 
Household income
< 3,000$/month
417
25.2
48
11.5
238
57.1
131
31.4
< .0001
3,000–4,999$/month
1,064
64.3
46
4.3
569
53.5
449
42.2
 
≥ 5,000$/month
173
10.5
5
2.9
85
49.1
83
48.0
 
Current job
No
1,255
75.9
77
6.1
645
51.4
553
42.5
0.001
Yes
399
24.1
22
5.5
247
61.9
130
32.6
 
Parity
Primipara
645
39.0
47
7.3
323
50.1
275
42.6
0.4317
Multipara
1,009
61.0
52
5.2
569
56.4
388
38.4
 
Pregnancy loss experience
None
1,301
78.7
83
6.4
718
55.2
500
38.4
0.0232
Had
353
21.3
16
4.5
174
49.3
163
46.2
 
Current breastfeeding status
Yes
866
52.4
44
5.1
460
53.1
362
41.8
0.0018
No
788
47.6
55
7.0
432
54.8
301
38.2
 
Degree of parenting burden within the last month
Low
363
21.9
6
1.7
149
41.0
208
57.3
< .0001
Moderate
949
57.4
64
6.7
532
56.1
353
37.2
 
High
342
20.7
29
8.5
211
61.7
102
29.8
 
Subjective health status
High
1,162
70.2
46
4.0
614
52.8
502
43.2
< .0001
Moderate
435
26.3
42
9.7
242
55.6
151
34.7
 
Low
57
3.5
11
19.3
36
63.2
10
17.5
 
Perceived body image
Underweight
86
5.2
6
7.0
56
65.1
24
27.9
0.2281
Normal
885
53.5
52
5.9
471
53.2
362
40.9
 
Obese
683
41.3
41
6.0
365
53.4
277
40.6
 
Stress level
Low
292
17.7
11
3.8
154
52.7
127
43.5
< .0001
Moderate
1,136
68.7
50
4.4
618
54.4
468
41.2
 
High
226
13.6
38
16.8
120
53.1
68
30.1
 
Past diagnosis of depression
None
1,611
97.4
93
5.8
864
53.6
654
40.6
0.0076
Had
43
2.6
6
14.0
28
65.1
9
20.9
 
Smoking experience
None
1,596
96.5
91
5.7
858
53.8
647
40.5
 
Had
58
3.5
8
13.8
34
58.6
16
27.6
0.0128

Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05)

 
Table 3
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of the relationship between social support and postpartum depression
Variables
Postpartum depression
Univariable logistic regression
Multivariable logistic regression
cOR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
Social support
High
1.00
 
1.00
 
Moderate
2.66
1.93–3.67
1.78
1.25–2.52
Low
6.89
4.22–11.24
2.73
1.54–4.83
Age (in years)
19–29
1.00
 
1.00
 
30–39
1.03
0.71–1.49
1.03
0.67–1.57
40–49
0.79
0.45–1.38
0.77
0.40–1.45
Region
Urban area
1.00
 
1.00
 
Rural area
0.99
0.71–1.39
0.98
0.67–1.43
Education level
≤High school
1.00
 
1.00
 
≥College
0.68
0.50–0.90
0.77
0.54–1.08
Household income
< 3,000$/month
1.00
 
1.00
 
3,000–4,999$/month
0.59
0.44–0.79
0.76
0.54–1.07
≥ 5,000$/month
0.52
0.31–0.85
0.50
0.27–0.90
Current job
No
1.00
 
1.00
 
Yes
2.33
1.77–3.08
2.80
2.02–3.88
Parity
Primipara
1.00
 
1.00
 
Multipara
1.12
0.85–1.46
0.82
0.58–1.16
Pregnancy loss experience
None
1.00
 
1.00
 
Had
0.93
0.67–1.28
1.01
0.68–1.51
Current breastfeeding status
Yes
1.00
 
1.00
 
No
1.52
1.17–1.98
1.48
1.10–2.01
Degree of parenting burden within the last month
Low
1.00
 
1.00
 
Moderate
6.44
3.45–12.01
5.10
2.66–9.98
High
12.48
6.55–23.79
10.09
5.08–20.04
Subjective health status
High
1.00
 
1.00
 
Moderate
2.01
1.51–2.69
1.48
1.07–2.05
Low
9.34
5.38–16.23
5.41
2.83–10.36
Perceived body image
Underweight
1.00
 
1.00
 
Normal
0.56
0.32–0.96
0.98
0.52–1.87
Obese
0.80
0.46–1.38
1.24
0.65–2.36
Stress level
Low
1.00
 
1.00
 
Moderate
2.81
1.68–4.71
2.28
1.32–3.95
High
9.04
5.16–15.82
4.76
2.58–8.79
Past diagnosis of depression
None
1.00
 
1.00
 
Had
3.58
1.91–6.69
2.78
1.34–5.78
Smoking experience
None
1.00
 
1.00
 
Had
2.45
1.38–4.34
1.69
0.83–3.44


 
Table 4
The results of subgroup analysis of postpartum depression to social support stratified by parity, pregnancy loss experience perceived body image, current employment status
Variables
Postpartum depression
Social support
High
Moderate
Low
P-value
For trend
OR
aOR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
Parity
Primipara
1.00
1.05
0.62–1.78
1.74
0.74–4.10
0.0017
Multipara
1.00
2.85
1.68–4.82
4.90
2.14–11.23
< .0001
Pregnancy loss experience
None
1.00
1.58
1.07–2.35
2.15
1.14–4.05
< .0001
Had
1.00
2.36
0.99–5.63
10.26
2.16–48.73
< .0001
Perceived body image
Underweight
1.00
0.44
0.03–5.81
0.52
0.02–13.07
0.0987
Normal
1.00
2.45
1.46–4.10
3.35
1.43–7.85
< .0001
Obese
1.00
1.70
1.02–2.83
2.39
1.05–5.41
< .0001
Currently employed
No
1.00
1.97
1.27–3.05
2.39
1.21–4.71
< .0001
Yes
1.00
1.76
0.93–3.34
10.34
2.34–45.64
< .0001