We report the largest series to date of KD patients treated with CYC for large or rapidly progressive CAA. Following treatment with 1–2 doses of CYC, coronary artery dimensions stabilized, and no further immunosuppressive treatment was prescribed other than a tapering course of prednisone. Importantly, CYC was generally well tolerated, with no serious infections or long-term toxicities.
We compared clinical management and outcomes in our series to those of 7 previously reported cases in 3 published series.10–12, 14 CYC-treated KD cases varied significantly with respect to indications, dosing, duration and use of other medications (Table 3).
Table 3
Summary of Published Series of Patients with Severe Kawasaki Disease Treated with Cyclophosphamide.
Article | # of pnts | Age at Dx | Sex | CYC dose | Route | CYC duration | Prior Tx | Follow up | Outcome |
Wallace CA et al, 2000 | 2 | 0.9 year, 2.7yrs | Male | 2 mg/kg/day | IV then PO | 1.5-7mo | IVIG, IVMP | 2.5 year and 2.8yrs | Normal CAs at last follow up |
Lucron H et al, 2004 | 4 | 0.3 year, 0.8 year, 2yrs, 4.3yrs | 50% Male | 10 mg/kg/day IV, then 2 mg/kg/day PO | IV then PO | IV 2–5 days, PO 6-12mo | IVIG, Plasma-pheresis | 8yrs and 13yrs | 2/4 deceased, both with myocarditis and CAAs |
Briceno-Medina M et al, 2016 | 1 | 12yrs | Male | 15 mg/kg/day | IV | 4 doses | IVIG, IVMP | 3yrs | + CAA, no stenosis or thrombosis |
Current series, 2020 | 10 | Median 2yrs | 50% Male | 10 mg/kg/dose | IV | 1–2 doses | IVIG, IVMP, IFX, CsA, ANA | Median 2yrs 4mo | Mean (median) z scores at last follow up: LAD 7.5 (5.0), RCA 8.3 (6.0) |
Pnts: patients; Dx: diagnosis, CYC: cyclophosphamide; IV: intravenous; PO: oral; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; IVMP: intravenous methylprednisolone; CAs: coronary arteries, NL: normal, CAA: coronary artery aneurysms, z > 2.5; IFX: infliximab; ANA: anakinra; CsA: cyclosporine A; LAD: left anterior descending (proximal), RCA: right coronary artery.
In our cohort, we used CYC for worsening CAA, whereas prior case reports described use of CYC for refractory fever and/or persistent KD criteria. Wallace et al.10 described two KD patients who were treated with IV CYC (2 mg/kg/day) for recurrent clinical symptoms and a rise in C-reactive protein after discontinuation of IVMP. Oral CYC and prednisone were continued for 1.5 and 7 months. One of these patients had a medium sized aneurysm (5.5 mm) that remodeled to normal dimension by 2.5 years, and the other never developed aneurysms. A retrospective cohort of 52 KD patients treated from 1984–2003 in France described four patients treated with CYC.11 They received CYC (10 mg/kg IV x 2–5 days, +/- oral for 6–12 months) due to persistent fever after multiple doses of IVIG. No patient in this cohort was on concurrent daily corticosteroids; one patient received one dose of IVMP. Two patients survived with 8 and 13 years follow up, whereas the two patients who received 5 consecutive days of CYC died on Days 15 and 64. Briceno-Medina et al. 12 described a case of a 12 year old boy with KD complicated by multiple saccular aneurysms of the left main coronary artery, LAD, circumflex and RCA as well as a multiple non-coronary arterial aneurysms. He was treated with standard KD therapy plus methylprednisolone and CYC 15 mg/kg/day x4 doses. At three years of follow up, he had no evidence of coronary artery stenosis or thrombus, although giant CAAs persisted in both the RCA and LAD.
Our regimen of 1–2 doses of CYC differs from previous reports of prolonged treatment in refractory KD. A standardized dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg/dose IV was utilized, based on the use of CYC in other vasculitic and rheumatologic diseases.15 The more recent patients in our cohort received CYC earlier in their course, reflecting an increased institutional comfort with use of CYC in KD patients with severe coronary artery involvement.
Aside from self-resolving neutropenia in one patient as detailed above, there were no other reported short-term adverse events, consistent with reported experience.10,11,12 Long-term toxicity of CYC in regard to secondary malignancies and infertility was not reported but would not be expected given the young age of the patients and the low cumulative dose of CYC.
Limitations of this study are inherent to retrospective data collection, including lack of standardized initial treatment, varying timing of CYC, and use of other adjunctive anti-inflammatory therapies. Indeed, regimens in our cohort reflect secular trends of treatment in KD. While we saw stabilization and/or improvement in CAA in all patients after CYC therapy, it is not possible to ascribe causation of CAA improvement given the observational nature of our study and we cannot exclude the impact of treatments prior to CYC initiation. While all patients received multiple other anti-inflammatory therapies that may also have influenced CAA outcome, it is notable that most patients received CYC due to continued CAA enlargement despite these other therapies. The natural history of CAA in KD is often stabilization of CAA size dimensions in the 3rd to 6th weeks of illness; in some patients, CYC was administered in this timeframe. However, it is notable that 3 patients were treated with CYC before Day 17, a time period in which coronary dimensions often continue to expand, and all 3 experienced rapid improvement in their z scores after CYC.