See the published version of this preprint at Nature Communications.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Article
Olivier Broennimann
University of Lausanne
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Why do some alien species introductions fail while others are successful? One key hypothesis is that in order for a species to invade a new range, it must initially establish successfully in conditions within its native climatic niche (NCN). Yet, this hypothesis has largely remained untested at the level of individual release events. Using a dataset of 989 introductions of 177 mammal species worldwide, we show that climatic matching to the NCN, measured by a new Niche Margin Index (NMI), is a stronger predictor of establishment success than most previously tested life-history attributes and historical factors. Contrary to traditional climatic suitability metrics derived from species distribution models, the NMI is based on niche margins and provides a measure of how distant a site is inside or, importantly, outside the NCN. Integrating NMI as a measure of NCN-matching in risk assessments could improve efforts to prevent invasions and avoid costly eradications.
Keywords
alien species, native climatic niche, mammal
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
There is NO Competing Interest.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Nature Communications.
Version 1
Posted 23 Sep, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Terrestrial Ecology
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at Nature Communications.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Article
Olivier Broennimann
University of Lausanne
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Nature Communications.
Version 1
Posted 23 Sep, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Terrestrial Ecology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Nature Communications.
Why do some alien species introductions fail while others are successful? One key hypothesis is that in order for a species to invade a new range, it must initially establish successfully in conditions within its native climatic niche (NCN). Yet, this hypothesis has largely remained untested at the level of individual release events. Using a dataset of 989 introductions of 177 mammal species worldwide, we show that climatic matching to the NCN, measured by a new Niche Margin Index (NMI), is a stronger predictor of establishment success than most previously tested life-history attributes and historical factors. Contrary to traditional climatic suitability metrics derived from species distribution models, the NMI is based on niche margins and provides a measure of how distant a site is inside or, importantly, outside the NCN. Integrating NMI as a measure of NCN-matching in risk assessments could improve efforts to prevent invasions and avoid costly eradications.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
There is NO Competing Interest.
Loading...