Arieli, A. 1998. Whole cottonseed in dairy cattle feeding: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72(1–2): 97–110.
Balkcom, K.S., D.W. Reeves, J.N. Shaw, C.H. Burmester, and L.M. Curtis. 2006. Cotton yield and fiber quality from irrigated tillage systems in the Tennessee Valley. Agron. J. 98(3): 596–602. doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0219.
Bartimote, T., R. Quigley, J.M. Bennett, J. Hall, R. Brodrick, et al. 2017. A comparative study of conventional and controlled traffic in irrigated cotton: II. Economic and physiological analysis. Soil Tillage Res. 168: 133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.12.009.
Basal, H., N. Dagdelen, A. Unay, and E. Yilmaz. 2009. Effects of deficit drip irrigation ratios on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and fibre quality. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195(1): 19–29.
Bellaloui, N., S.R. Stetina, and R.B. Turley. 2015. Cottonseed protein, oil, and mineral status in near-isogenic Gossypium hirsutum cotton lines expressing fuzzy/linted and fuzzless/linted seed phenotypes under field conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 6(MAR). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00137.
Bellaloui, N., and R.B. Turley. 2013. Effects of fuzzless cottonseed phenotype on cottonseed nutrient composition in near isogenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum l.) mutant lines under well-watered and water stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 4(DEC). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00516.
Bowman, R.K., and D.E. Ethridge. 1992. Characteristic supplies and demands in a hedonic framework: US market for cotton fiber attributes. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 74(4): 991–1002.
Boykin, J.C., and K.N. Reddy. 2010. The effects of narrow-row and twin-row cotton on fiber properties. J. Cotton Sci. 14(4): 205–211.
Dağdelen, N., H. Başal, E. Yılmaz, T. Gürbüz, and S. Akcay. 2009. Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey. Agric. Water Manag. 96(1): 111–120.
Darawsheh, M., and E.M. Khah. 2009. Cotton row spacing and plant density cropping systems II. Effects on seedcotton yield, boll components and lint quality ZeroParasitic View project Weed soil seedbank-Seed physiology View project. J. Food Ag. Environ. 7: 262–265. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267225038 (accessed 22 January 2020).
Desclaux, D., and P. Roumet. 1996. Impact of drought stress on the phenology of two soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr) cultivars.
Dowd, M.K. 2015. Seed. Cotton 2nd ed., Agron. Monogr. 57. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI. p. 745–782
Feng, L., G. Mathis, G. Ritchie, Y. Han, Y. Li, et al. 2014. Optimizing irrigation and plant density for improved cotton yield and fiber quality. Agron. J. 106(4): 1111–1118. doi: 10.2134/agronj13.0503.
Ge, Y., J.A. Thomasson, R. Sui, C.L. Morgan, S.W. Searcy, et al. 2008. Spatial variation of fiber quality and associated loan rate in a dryland cotton field. Precis. Agric. 9(4): 181–194.
Kebede, H., D.K. Fisher, R. Sui, and K.N. Reddy. 2014. Irrigation Methods and Scheduling in the Delta Region of Mississippi: Current Status and Strategies to Improve Irrigation Efficiency. Am. J. Plant Sci. 05(20): 2917–2928. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2014.520307.
Letey, J., and A. Dinar. 1986. Simulated crop-water production functions for several crops when irrigated with saline waters. Hilgardia 54(1): 1–32.
Pettigrew, W.T. 2004. Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron. J. 96(2): 377–383. doi: 10.2134/agronj2004.0377.
Pettigrew, W.T. 2010. Impact of varying planting dates and irrigation regimes on cotton growth and lint yield production. Agron. J. 102(5): 1379–1387.
Pettigrew, W.T., and M.K. Dowd. 2011. Varying planting dates or irrigation regimes alters cottonseed composition. Crop Sci. 51(5): 2155–2164.
Pettigrew, W.T., and M.K. Dowd. 2012. Molecular biology and physiology: Interactions between irrigation regimes and varieties result in altered cottonseed composition. J. Cotton Sci. 16(1): 42–52.
Pinnamaneni, S.R., S.S. Anapalli, K.N. Reddy, D.K. Fisher, and N.E.Q. Ashwell. 2020. Assessing irrigation water use efficiency and economy of twin‐row soybean in the Mississippi Delta. Agron. J. doi: 10.1002/agj2.20321.
Plumblee, M.T., D.M. Dodds, L.J. Krutz, A.L. Catchot, J. Irby, et al. 2019. Determining the Optimum Irrigation Schedule in Furrow Irrigated Cotton using Soil Moisture Sensors. Crop. Forage Turfgrass Manag. 5(1).
Reddy, K.N., and J.C. Boykin. 2010. Weed Control and Yield Comparisons of Twin- and Single-Row Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Production Systems. Weed Technol. 24(2): 95–101. doi: 10.1614/wt-d-09-00044.1.
Roth, G. 2010. Economic, environmental and social sustainability indicators of the Australian cotton industry. Cotton Catchment Communities CRC.
Stansbury, M.F., W.A. Pons, and G.T. Den Hartog. 1956. Relations between oil, nitrogen, and gossypol in cottonseed kernels. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 33(6): 282–286.
Stephenson, D.O., L.T. Barber, and F.M. Bourland. 2011. Agronomy and soils: Effect of twin-row planting pattern and plant density on cotton growth, yield, and fiber quality. J. Cotton Sci. 15(3): 243–250.
Sui, R., R.K. Byler, and C.D. Delhom. 2017. Effect of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality in Irrigated and Rainfed Cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 21: 113–121.
USDA- NAS. 2019. Mississippi Cotton County Estimates. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Mississippi/Publications/County_Estimates/2018/18_MS_cotton_all.pdf.
Wang, L., X.-R. Li, H. Lian, D.-A. Ni, Y. He, et al. 2010. Evidence that high activity of vacuolar invertase is required for cotton fiber and Arabidopsis root elongation through osmotic dependent and independent pathways, respectively. Plant Physiol. 154(2): 744–756.
Wanjura, D.F., D.R. Upchurch, J.R. Mahan, and J.J. Burke. 2002. Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 55(3): 217–237. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00175-5.
Witt, T., M. Ulloa, R. Schwartz, G.R.-F.C. Research, and U. 2020. 2020. Response to deficit irrigation of morphological, yield and fiber quality traits of upland (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Pima (G. barbadense L.) cotton in the Texas High. F. Crop. Res. 249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107759.
Yang, Y.-W., S.-M. Bian, Y. Yao, and J.-Y. Liu. 2008. Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into the fiber elongating process in cotton. J. Proteome Res. 7(11): 4623–4637.
Zhang, D., Z. Luo, S. Liu, W. Li, WeiTang, et al. 2016. Effects of deficit irrigation and plant density on the growth, yield and fiber quality of irrigated cotton. F. Crop. Res. 197: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.06.003.