Distribution of Respondent Characteristics Frequency
Respondent characteristics include age, gender, level of education, and work area. Below is a table of the distribution of the characteristics of respondents.
Table 1. Frequency Distribution of Respondents’ Characteristics Exposed to BTX
Respondents’ Characteristics
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Age
|
|
|
16-25
|
13
|
16%
|
26-35
|
14
|
17.3%
|
36-45
|
27
|
33.4%
|
46-55
|
18
|
22.3%
|
56-65
|
9
|
11%
|
Gender
|
|
|
Male
|
63
|
77.7%
|
Female
|
18
|
22.3%
|
Level of Education
|
|
|
Primary
|
14
|
17.3%
|
Junior High
|
22
|
27.1%
|
Senior High
|
42
|
51.9%
|
Undergraduate
|
3
|
3.7%
|
Working Area
|
|
|
Romokalisari
|
24
|
29.6%
|
Ketintang
|
19
|
23.5%
|
Jemursari
|
10
|
12.3%
|
Kalijudan
|
17
|
21%
|
AUP
|
11
|
13.6%
|
Source: primary data
Based on Table 1, most of the workers (33.4%) are aged 36-45 years, are male (77.7%), have high school/vocational education (51.9%) and work in the Romokalisari area (29.6%).
Comparison of the results of the calculation of concentration, RQ, ECR BTX for respondents exposed to BTX
Table 2. Distribution of Benzene Concentrations (ppm), RQ and ECR of Benzene in Workers Exposed to BTX
Benzene
|
n
|
%
|
Mean ± SD
|
Min
|
NAB
|
C (ppm)
|
Abnormal (>0,05 ppm)
|
53
|
65.4%
|
5.78±11.17
|
0.04
|
≤0,05 ppm
|
Normal (≤0,05 ppm)
|
28
|
34.6%
|
RQ
|
Unsafe ( ≥1)
|
52
|
64.2%
|
27.3±68.81
|
0.03
|
<1
|
Safe (<1)
|
29
|
35.8%
|
ECR
|
Unsafe ( > 10-4)
|
74
|
91,4%
|
0.074±0.01
|
0.00
|
≤ 10-4
|
Safe ( ≤ 10-4)
|
7
|
8.6%
|
Based on Table 2 and in Figure 1, the majority of workers (65.4%) have benzene concentrations above the Threshold Value (> 0.05 ppm).
The average benzene concentration was 5.78 ppm which has exceeded the specified TLV (> 0.05 ppm) (Ministry of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia, 1997). Health risk characteristics are expressed as Risk Quotient (RQ, Risk Level) calculated by dividing intake (ink) and reference (RfC). The results of the calculation of Risk Quotients (RQ) can show the level of health risk of workers due to xylene exposure in the work environment. If the RQ value is more than or equal to 1 (RQ> 1), workers exposed to benzene have a health risk due to exposure. If the RQ value is less than 1 (RQ <1), the exposed worker is safe from health risks due to exposure (Kolluru, 1996). Based on the RQ calculation in Table 2, the majority of workers (64.2%) had a value of RQ≥1, which means that the majority of workers had a health risk impact due to exposure to toluene.
ECR ≤ 10-4 means the concentration of benzene exposure does not cause the risk of carcinogenic effects. ECR is> 10-4 means the concentration of benzene exposure may have carcinogenic health effect. From the results of ECR calculations for benzene exposure, the majority of workers (91.4%) had an ECR value> 10-4 which means the risk of developing cancer.
Table 3. Distribution of Toluene Concentrations (ppm), RQ and ECR of Toluene in Workers Exposed to BTX
Toluene
|
n
|
%
|
Mean ± SD
|
Min
|
NAB
|
C (ppm)
|
Unsafe (>20 ppm)
|
34
|
42%
|
30.02±59.07
|
0.0036
|
≤20 ppm
|
Safe (≤20 ppm)
|
47
|
58%
|
RQ
|
Unsafe ( ≥1)
|
61
|
75.3%
|
15.93±48.19
|
0.03
|
<1
|
Safe (<1)
|
20
|
24.7%
|
ECR
|
Unsafe ( > 10-4)
|
69
|
85.2%
|
0.109±0.284
|
0.00
|
≤ 10-4
|
Safe ( ≤ 10-4)
|
12
|
14.8%
|
Based on Table 3 and Figure 2, the majority of workers (58%) showed toluene concentrations below the Threshold Value (≤20 ppm). The average concentration of toluene was 30.02 ppm. This exceeds the established TLV (Ministry of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia, 1997). Based on the RQ calculation in Table 3, the majority of workers (75.3%) had an RQ≥1 value, which means that the majority of workers have a health risk impact due to exposure to toluene. From the results of ECR calculations for toluene exposure, the majority of workers (85.2%) have ECR values> 10-4, which means they are at risk of cancer.
Table 4. Distribution of Xylene Concentrations (ppm) and RQ Xylene in Workers Exposed to BTX in the Surabaya Industry
Xylene
|
n
|
%
|
Mean ± SD
|
Min
|
NAB
|
C (ppm)
|
Unsafe (>100 ppm)
|
1
|
1.2
|
24.85±114.03
|
0.0015
|
100 ppm
|
Safe (≤100 ppm)
|
80
|
98.8
|
RQ
|
Unsafe ( ≥1)
|
63
|
77.8
|
959±1564
|
0.0045
|
<1
|
Safe (<1)
|
18
|
22.2
|
ECR
|
Unsafe
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Safe
|
-
|
-
|
Based on Table 4, the majority of workers (98.8%) had xylene concentrations below the Threshold Value (≤100 ppm). The average value of xylene concentration is 24.85 ppm not exceeding the specified TLV (Ministry of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia, 1997). Based on the RQ calculation in Table 4, the majority of workers (77.8%) have an RQ≥1 value which means they have a health risk due to xylene exposure. The ECR was not calculated for xylene exposure because xylene is not a carcinogenic substance.
Biomaker parameters
Table 5. Frequency Distribution of parameter biomarkers in Workers Exposed to BTX
Biomarker
|
Number (n)
|
Percent (%)
|
Mean ± SD
|
Min
|
Max
|
MDA (mikron mol/L)
|
Abnormal
|
57
|
100
|
7.76±2.40
|
4.35
|
14.4
|
Normal
|
0
|
0
|
DNA degeneration
|
Degeneration
|
25
|
30.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Non degeneration
|
56
|
69.1
|
Biomarker parameters examined in this study included DNA degeneration and MDA levels (micron mol / L), each of which was compared with the existing TLV and categorized into 2 types, namely abnormal and normal. Normal MDA levels are 1.076 micron mol / L (Bhutia et al., 2011; Arifin, Ernawati and Prihatini, 2019). Based on Table 5, the majority of workers have MDA levels in the abnormal category while the majority of workers (69.1%) did not experience DNA degeneration.
Relationship between BTX concentrations (ppm), MDA and DNA degeneration (N = 81)
Table 6. Statistical test results between concentrations of BTX, MDA and DNA degeneration
Compound
|
MDA (mikron mol/L)
|
DNA
|
B
|
-.268*
|
-0.140
|
T
|
-.286*
|
-.231*
|
X
|
-0,119
|
-.161
|
*p < 0.05
Based on the test results in table 6, there was a relationship between the concentrations of benzene, toluene and MDA levels in workers exposed to BTX with a P value <0.05. There was a relationship between toluene concentration and DNA degeneration in workers exposed to BTX with a P value <0.05. There was no relationship between xylene concentrations and MDA levels in workers exposed to BTX in the industry in Surabaya with a P value> 0.05. There was no relationship between the concentration of benzene, xylene and DNA degeneration in workers exposed to BTX in industries in Surabaya with a P value> 0.05.
Relationship between RQ BTX, MDA and DNA degeneration (N = 81)
Table 7. Statistical Test Results Between RQ BTX, MDA and DNA degeneration
RQ
|
MDA (mikron mol/L)
|
DNA degenartion
|
B
|
0.063
|
0.195
|
T
|
-0.087
|
-0.153
|
X
|
0.085
|
-0.077
|
*p < 0.05
Based on the test results in table 7 there was no relationship between RQ BTX, MDA level and DNA degeneration in workers exposed to BTX in industries in Surabaya with a P value> 0.05.
Relationship between ECR BTX, MDA and DNA degeneration (N = 81)
Table 8. Statistical Test Results Between ECR BTX, MDA and DNA degeneration
ECR
|
MDA (mikron mol/L)
|
DNA degeneration
|
B
|
-0.190
|
0.002
|
T
|
-0.182
|
-.221*
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
*p < 0.05
Based on the test results in table 5, there was a relationship between Toluene ECR and DNA degeneration in workers exposed to BTX in industries in Surabaya with a P value> 0.05. There was no relationship between ECR Benzene and toluene with MDA levels in workers exposed to BTX (P> 0.05). There was no relationship between ECR Benzene and DNA degeneration in workers exposed to BTX in industries in Surabaya (P> 0.05).