Rapid Visualization and Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus Based on Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-763986/v1

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a common clinical bacterial pathogen that can cause a diverse range of infections. The establishment of a rapid and reliable assay for the early diagnosis and detection of S. aureus is of great significance. In this study, we developed a closed-tube loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the visual detection of S. aureus using the colorimetric indicator hydroxy naphthol blue (HNB). The LAMP reaction was optimized by adjusting the amplification temperature, the concentrations of Mg2+, dNTP, and HNB, and the incubation time. In the optimized reaction system, the specificity of LAMP for S. aureus was 100%. The results established that this method accurately identified S. aureus, with no cross-reactivity with 16 non-S. aureus strains. The limit of detection (LOD) of LAMP was 8 copies/reaction of purified plasmid DNA or 400 colony-forming units/reaction of S. aureus. Compared with conventional PCR, LAMP lowered the LOD by 10-fold. Finally, 220 clinically isolated strains of S. aureus and 149 non-S. aureus strains were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of LAMP. The findings indicated that LAMP is a reliable test for S. aureus and could be a promising tool for the rapid diagnosis of S. aureus infections.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a common human pathogen that secretes a variety of virulence factors with significant pathogenicity (Otto 2014). S. aureus can cause a wide range of clinical infections, from localized skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening necrotizing pneumonia (Oliveira et al. 2018). It is also the main cause of bacteremia and osteoarticular, pleuropulmonary, and device-related infections (Tong et al. 2015). S. aureus bacteremia is highly prevalent and extremely hard to treat, leading to increased mortality and the burden of additional medical costs (Jin et al. 2021; Naber 2009). Therefore, the development of a reliable and rapid test to accurately detect S. aureus presents an urgent clinical need.

The conventional detection of S. aureus is based on microbial culturing, including bacterial colony morphology, biochemical reactions, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Sheet et al. 2016). Although this method has good sensitivity and reliability, it has some obvious limitations. For example, some bacterial species grow only in specific nutrient matrices and their identification requires various selective media (Lazcka et al. 2007). Moreover, the culturing of strains is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process, taking approximately 2–5 days to produce the desired results (Zhou et al. 2021). Consequently, many patients may miss the optimal period of treatment. Moreover, the improper use of antibiotics may lead to bacterial resistance (Paule et al. 2005). In recent decades, various molecular diagnostic methods have been devised and applied for the classification and identification of pathogenic microorganisms (Mwaigwisya et al. 2015). Compared with microbiological culturing, molecular diagnostic technology has higher sensitivity, better reproducibility, and a shorter time required to produce results. For example, PCR technology as an alternative to microbiological culturing is popular in the field of pathogenic microbial diagnosis because of its great amplification performance (Florio et al. 2018). Several studies have reported on PCR assays for the detection of S. aureus in clinical samples with a high diagnostic accuracy rate (Brakstad et al. 1992; Wang et al. 2019). However, a PCR assay requires expensive experimental instruments, reagents, and skilled personnel, which may not be readily available in many resource-poor areas. Therefore, a cost-effective, simple, and reliable assay for the identification of S. aureus should be developed as an alternative routine laboratory test.

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a viable alternative to PCR in the molecular diagnosis of bacterial pathogens. LAMP technology utilizes four primers to identify the target sequence with high selectivity and good amplification specificity (Notomi et al. 2000). It can amplify a limited initial number of DNA copies to one million copies in one hour at isothermal conditions and does not require pre-denaturation of the template (Notomi et al. 2015; Nagamine et al. 2001). Recently, LAMP technology has been applied to the detection of several pathogenic bacteria, parasites, viruses, and diseases (Wong et al. 2018; Wong et al. 2009; Fang et al. 2010). However, the conventional LAMP technique analyzes amplification results by agarose gel electrophoresis or turbidimetry, which often require extended workflow times or specialized equipment (Mori et al. 2001). Direct visual detection of turbidity to determine whether amplification has occurred is the simplest and most cost-effective method, but it is difficult to observe the precipitate even under ideal conditions, limiting the widespread use of LAMP in clinical laboratories (Mori et al. 2004; Miyamoto et al. 2015). Hydroxy naphthol blue (HNB) is a metal ion indicator, which can visualize DNA amplification by detecting the decrease of Mg2+ ion concentration during the LAMP reaction process (Goto et al. 2009). HNB is easy to use and the colors of negative and positive reactions are significantly different, which enables the LAMP reaction to achieve a clear and rapid visual detection.

Materials And Methods

Bacterial strains and genomic DNA template preparation

A total of 15 bacterial strains were used to analyze the specificity of the LAMP reaction, as listed in Table 1. A total of 369 bacterial strains were isolated from patients at the Sichuan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Chengdu Fifth People’s Hospital from January to May 2021 (Table S1). These strains were identified at the species level by the VITEK 2 compact system (Biomerieux, France) which was used as the gold standard for clinical diagnostic efficacy evaluation of the LAMP method. For enrichment culture, all strains were inoculated in tryptic soy broth (TSB) liquid medium and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 12 hours. Ezup Column Bacteria Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon, China) was used to extract the genome DNA following the manufacturer’s protocols, and then stored at -20℃ for subsequent experiments. For the 10-fold serial dilution of S. aureus (ATCC 25923), used for sensitivity assessment, we extracted its genomic DNA using 5× Hotshot + Tween reagent (Brewster et al. 2013).

Table 1

The strains used for LAMP specificity analysis

Species

Source

Number of strains

Results of LAMP

S. aureus

ATCC 25923

1

Salmonella enterica

ATCC 14028

1

-

Serratia marcescens

CMCC(B) 41002

1

-

Enterobacter cloacae

CMCC(B) 45301

1

-

Klebsiella pneumoniae

CMCC(B) 46117

1

-

Alcaligenes faecalis

ATCC 8750

1

-

Enterococcus faecalis

ATCC 29212

1

-

Escherichia coli

ATCC 25922

1

-

Staphylococcus epidermidis

ATCC 12228

1

-

Shigella flexneri

ATCC 12022

1

-

Shigella dysenteriae

CMCC(B) 51105

1

-

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

ATCC 27853

1

-

Vibrio parahemolyticus

ATCC 17802

1

-

Vibrio alginolyticus

CICC 21664

1

-

Enterococcus faecium

ATCC 19434

1

-

Notes: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; CMCC, National Center for Medical Culture Collections; CICC, China Center of Industrial Culture Collection; +, positive result; −, negative result.

Screening of target genes and primer design

We initially screened for genes specific to S. aureus by local BLAST and online BLAST was used to further identify the target gene, according to previously published procedures (Li et al. 2019). LAMP primers were designed using Primer Explorer V5 (https://primerexplorer.jp/lampv5/index.html) based on the target sequence. The primer design and screening process were carried out according to the primer designing manual (http://primerexplorer.jp/e/v5_manual/index.html). The specificity of primers was validated by BLASTN against the GenBank nucleotide database.

Construction of positive control plasmids

We constructed the positive control plasmids by inserting the target sequence into the pEASY®-T3 Cloning Vector (TransGen, China). Then, the plasmids were transferred to Trans1-T1 Phage Resistant Chemically Competent cells (TransGen, China) to yield positive clones. The transformed cells were then incubated in Luria-Bertani liquid medium for enrichment at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 12 hours in the presence of ampicillin. Positive plasmids were extracted from enriched clones with the TIAN pure Mini Plasmid Kit (Tiangen, China), and their sequences were verified by gene sequencing and stored at -20°C for subsequent experiments. All operating procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer's manuscript.

Optimizations for the LAMP assay

The optimization of the LAMP reaction was performed on a G1000 gene amplification instrument (Bioer Technology, China) with purified positive plasmids (8×105 copies/µL) as templates. Nuclease-free water (TransGen, China) was used as a template for the LAMP blank control. The reaction parameters were sequentially optimized for temperatures in the range of 61–65 ℃, Mg2+ concentrations between 2.0–10.0 mM, dNTP in the range of 0.6–1.4 mM, incubation times between 15–65 min, and HNB (Aladdin, China) between 60–180 µΜ. Effective amplification resulted in a color change from violet to sky blue. However, the color of the blank control reaction remained violet. Agarose gel electrophoresis was applied for the determination and verification of the amplification of fragments of the correct sizes. The positive amplification of LAMP showed typical ladder bands, while no bands were visible in the negative control. Images were captured by SmartGel 140 (Sage Creation Science, China). All experiments were repeated three times.

Specificity of the LAMP assay

The specificity of the LAMP assay was assessed by detecting genomic DNA extracted from 15 strains of bacterial based on the established optimal reaction system. In addition, a LAMP reaction mixture containing the genomic DNA of non-S. aureus strains was used as a negative control. For the blank control, nuclease‑free water was used without any genomic DNA. The amplification results indicated by the color change of HNB dye were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. All experiments were repeated three times.

Sensitivity of the LAMP assay

Two different templates, the positive control plasmid and genomic DNA of S. aureus, were used to evaluate the limit of detection (LOD) of LAMP reaction under optimized conditions. The extracted positive plasmids, at a concentration of 30.52 ng/µL, were mixed with Tris-EDTA buffer (20 mmol/L Tris-HCl and 2 mmol/L EDTA) and diluted to 8×108 copies/µL as a working solution, which was then serially diluted 10-fold to a working concentration (8×108-8×100 copies/µL). To obtain a specific DNA copy number per µl from the DNA stock solution, we referred to the DNA Copy Number and Dilution Calculator tool (https://www.thermofisher.cn/cn/zh/home/brands/thermo-scientific/molecular-biology/molecular-biology-learning-center/molecular-biology-resource-library/thermo-scientific-web-tools/dna-copy-number-calculator.html). The S. aureus bacterial suspensions (4×108 CFU/mL) was serially diluted 10-fold in TSB liquid medium to obtain a series of bacterial solution at various concentrations (4×108-4×100 CFU/mL). These bacterial suspensions were directly lysed by the 5× Hotshot + Tween reagent and the resulting solutions were used as the template for LAMP analysis. The LOD of LAMP was calculated based on the minimum mean concentration of the positive plasmid and S. aureus. All experiments were repeated three times.

Application of LAMP in clinical strain samples

The clinical diagnostic efficacy of the LAMP assay was determined using the 369 clinical isolates. These samples were inoculated into TSB liquid medium for enrichment and the genomic DNA was extracted for LAMP experiments. PCR was also performed with specific primers F3 and B3. Finally, we compared the results of the LAMP assay with those of the PCR in terms of specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The calculation formula used were as follows: specificity = TN/(TN་FP)×100%; sensitivity = TP/(TP་FN)×100%; PPV = TP/(TP་FP)×100%; NPV = TN/(TN་FN)×100%.

Results

Selection of target gene and primers

Following the results of local BLAST and online BLAST screening, a highly conservative specific sequence in the S. aureus MJ163 chromosome was selected as the target gene in this study. Then, four LAMP primers for the target gene were designed as listed in Table 2.

Table 2

LAMP primers for S. aureus

Primer

Sequence (5’→ 3’)

F

CGTTGGCTTAATAGATTAATTGTTG

B

ACGCACTCCTTTTCCAAAT

FIP

ACGGAATGTAAGCGTAAGAAACGCGTGCTAATGTTTTTAAATGGATTC

BIP

AGAAAGTCTAACGCTTAAAACTGCTGAATTGCTGCTTGCATGAC

Optimal reaction system for LAMP

The critical parameters of the LAMP reaction, including amplification temperature, the concentration of Mg2+ and dNTP, and incubation time, were optimized to achieve optimal amplification efficiency. As shown in Fig. 1a, LAMP electrophoresis bands were brighter at 62°C than at other amplification temperatures, with no significant differences at 61, 63, 64, or 65°C. Therefore, 62°C was selected as the optimal reaction amplification temperature for subsequent experiments. For the optimization of Mg2+ concentrations at 62°C, the best amplification efficiency was observed at 8.0 mM Mg2+ (Fig. 1b). The maximum amount of amplification products was obtained at 1.2 mM dNTP (Fig. 1c). The amplification product was first detected when the reaction was performed for 35 minutes (Fig. 1d). For optimal amplification, an incubation time of 45 min was subsequently used as a LAMP reaction parameter. Based on the above reaction system, 120 µM HNB was selected in subsequent experiments to achieve optimal visual detection (Fig. 1e).

In summary, the optimized LAMP system used in the present study contained 2.5 µL 10× isothermal amplification buffer, 8.0 U Bst 2.0 DNA polymerase, 8.0 mM Mg2+, 1.2 mM dNTP, 0.8 M betaine, 120 µM HNB, 0.2 µM each of primers F and B, 1.6 µM each of primers FIP (forward inner primer) and BIP (backward inner primer), DNA template and nucleasefree water. The reaction mixture was incubated at 62℃ for 45 minutes and then heated at 80℃ for 2 minutes to terminate the reaction.

Validation of the specificity of LAMP

A significant color change in the LAMP assay from violet to sky blue was only observed for the S. aureus strain, while the 14 non-S. aureus strains retained their original violet color (Fig. 2a). Agarose gel electrophoresis further confirmed that only the strain of S. aureus showed typical ladder-like pattern bands, while the others showed no bands (Fig. 2b). These results were consistent with the PCR assay using the primers F3 and B3 (Fig. 2c). These consistent results indicated that the LAMP assay that we developed specifically detects S. aureus and has no significant cross-reactivity with other species.

Limit of detection of LAMP

Significant color changes from violet to sky blue were observed in the 10-fold serial dilutions of the positive plasmid templates ranging from 8 × 108 to 8 × 100 copies/reaction when the LAMP assay was performed at 62°C for 45 min (Fig. 3a). The amplification results were further confirmed on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3c). However, the LOD of conventional PCR was 8 × 101 copies/reaction for the positive plasmid (Fig. 3e). To further explore the sensitivity of the LAMP assay, a suspension of S. aureus was diluted to 4 × 108, 4 × 107, 4 × 106, 4 × 105, 4 × 104, 4 × 103, 4 × 102, 4 × 101, and 4 × 100 CFU/mL, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted from these diluted samples and directly used for LAMP and PCR analysis. The results showed that at a dilution of 4 × 103 CFU/reaction S. aureus could be detected by PCR (Fig. 3f), while S. aureus could be detected by LAMP at a dilution of 4 × 102 CFU/reaction (Fig. 3b and 3d). Therefore, the value of LOD of the LAMP assay was 10-fold lower than that of PCR. Consequently, for the detection of S. aureus the LOD of the LAMP assay was superior to that of the PCR assay.

Clinical diagnostic efficacy of LAMP

Next, we analyzed 369 clinical isolates to determine the clinical diagnostic efficacy of the LAMP assay. Among 149 non-S. aureus strains one strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae exhibited non-specific amplification in the PCR reaction (Fig. 4c). Conversely, none of the non-S. aureus strains were effectively amplified in LAMP (Fig. 4a and 4b). Of the 220 S. aureus-positive samples, 2 strains were deemed negative by LAMP and PCR. Therefore, compared with the gold standard, the specificity of the LAMP assay was 100.00%, and the sensitivity was 99.09%. Meanwhile, the PPV of LAMP for the detection of S. aureus was 100.00% and the NPV was 98.68%. The results of testing clinical strains revealed that LAMP is a reliable and accurate assay for the detection of S. aureus.

Discussion

S. aureus is a common clinical pathogen that causes a variety of serious hospital and community-acquired infections (Holland et al. 2014). Rapid and accurate diagnosis of S. aureus is a key component of treatment, prevention, and interruption of transmission. The currently existing diagnostic methods have limitations as they are either time-consuming (microbial culturing) or expensive (PCR). LAMP is a simple and cost-effective molecular diagnostic method with distinct advantages for the rapid diagnosis of pathogens.

In this study, we successfully developed, optimized, and validated a molecular biology diagnostic LAMP assay for the detection of S. aureus. The critical parameters of the LAMP reaction were optimized to achieve optimal amplification and performance by visual inspection. The optimized LAMP assay can accurately differentiate S. aureus from non-S. aureus strains, and sensitively detect trace amounts of S. aureus.

At present, a variety of colorimetric indicators have been developed for LAMP reaction endpoint detection. Although these indicators are reliable and convenient, they have some limitations. Calcein needs to bind the ionic form of manganese to work, but manganese may inhibit the LAMP reaction and reduce the sensitivity of the assay (Tanner et al. 2015). The fluorescent intercalating dye SYBR Green I is expensive, highly toxic, and requires additional testing equipment (Fischbach et al. 2015). Leuco crystal violet (LCV) requires the preparation of proprietary LCV immobilized tubes, which are complicated to operate (Miyamoto et al. 2015). In contrast, HNB is a cheap and stable synthetic dye. It indicates the result of the LAMP reaction by detecting the consumption of free magnesium ions in the reaction system, which is reliable and effective for LAMP. A multi-observer study showed that HNB as an indicator was superior to the other methods (Wastling et al. 2010). The use of the colorimetric indicator HNB makes the judgment of the LAMP amplification results easier, eliminating the need for tedious electrophoresis operations and greatly avoiding cross-contamination caused by aerosols (Nie 2005). Therefore, HNB was selected as the best dye for this study.

We compared the sensitivity of the LAMP assay with that of the PCR assay and found that the LOD of the LAMP was 10-fold lower than PCR, both for the positive plasmid and S. aureus. Several related studies have also confirmed that the sensitivity of LAMP assay was equivalent or higher compared to PCR (Choopara et al. 2021; Maeda et al. 2005; Prusty et al. 2016). In addition, LAMP technology is more convenient, time-saving, and cost-saving. The entire detection process of LAMP, including template preparation (approximately 40 min), isothermal amplification (45 min), and result determination (approximately 2 min), can be completed within 90 min and the cost of analysis is also lower than that of PCR (Zheng et al. 2018). More importantly, LAMP testing is easy to operate, which can reduce labor costs. Finally, LAMP is often described as a less demanding test than PCR in terms of DNA purification. For example, bacterial colonies are added directly to the reaction mixture for the LAMP reaction, or centrifuged pellet samples are boiled in the presence of 1% Triton X-100 and the released DNA can be used directly for the LAMP reaction without purification (Sowmya et al. 2012; Yan et al. 2017).

The clinical diagnostic efficacy of LAMP analysis is shown in Table 3. A Klebsiella pneumoniae strain, isolated from the sputum of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, showed a non-specific electrophoresis band by PCR amplification. The electrophoresis results showed that the amplified band size was over 250 bp, while the target fragment band size for S. aureus was 219 bp (Fig. 4c). One possible explanation is that the genome of this strain has some base fragments homologous to the target gene in S. aureus. However, due to the specific amplification mechanism, the LAMP reaction did not produce a false-positive result for this sample. This indicates that the specificity of the LAMP assay (100%) is superior to that of the PCR (99.33%). In other related studies, the specificity of both detection methods for bacterial pathogens was consistent (Thakur et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2013). Meanwhile, 2 strains of S. aureus were not identified by LAMP, one case isolated from a sputum sample of a patient with cerebral hemorrhage, and the other isolated from the blood of a shock patient. We speculate that this result may be related to a genetic mutation of the strains themselves. Another point worth mentioning is that although the LOD of the LAMP assay was lower than that of the PCR assay, the sensitivity of the PCR assay is equivalent to that of the LAMP assay in clinical strain detection, which may be related to the low number of clinical strains we analyzed. Our study provides a rapid detection protocol for S. aureus. However, for point-of-care testing, further research is still needed. If LAMP technology is integrated into a microfluidic system, DNA extraction, isothermal amplification, and colorimetric analysis could be completed in one step, which will have greater potential for clinical applications (Liu et al. 2020; Wan et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019).

Table 3

Diagnostic efficacy of LAMP and PCR in clinical bacteria strains

Method

Specificity

Sensitivity

NPV

PPV

LAMP

100%

99.09%

98.68%

100%

PCR

99.33%

99.09%

98.67%

99.54%

Notes: NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

Conclusions

In summary, we successfully developed a LAMP assay for the rapid detection of S. aureus. In particular, the colorimetric indicator HNB was used to indicate the LAMP test result, and the positive LAMP reactions were easily identified by the naked eye under ambient light. Application of LAMP for rapid detection of clinical isolates gave a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 98.68%. LAMP is simpler, faster, and easier to perform than conventional PCR and culture microbiology. Therefore, the present research shows that LAMP can be an effective tool for the immediate diagnosis of S. aureus infection.

Declarations

Funding The project first-class disciplines development supported by Chengdu University of traditional Chinese medicine (Grant No. CZYJC1904).

Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Availability of data and material The datasets and materials generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval All the samples were residual specimens after diagnostic sampling therefore do not involve ethics approval. 

Consent to participate Not applicable. 

Consent for publication Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the project first-class disciplines development of Chengdu University of traditional Chinese medicine (Grant No. CZYJC1904) is greatly acknowledged.

References

  1. Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA (1992) Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol 30(7):1654–1660
  2. Brewster JD, Paoli GC (2013) DNA extraction protocol for rapid PCR detection of pathogenic bacteria. Anal Biochem 442(1):107–109
  3. Choopara I, Teethaisong Y, Arunrut N, Thunyaharn S, Kiatpathomchai W, Somboonna N (2021) Specific and sensitive, ready-to-use universal fungi detection by visual color using ITS1 loop-mediated isothermal amplification combined hydroxynaphthol blue. PeerJ 9:e11082
  4. Fang X, Liu Y, Kong J, Jiang X (2010) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification integrated on microfluidic chips for point-of-care quantitative detection of pathogens. Anal Chem 82(7):3002–3006
  5. Fischbach J, Xander NC, Frohme M, Glökler JF (2015) Shining a light on LAMP assays–a comparison of LAMP visualization methods including the novel use of berberine. Biotechniques 58(4):189–194
  6. Florio W, Morici P, Ghelardi E, Barnini S, Lupetti A (2018) Recent advances in the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections. Crit Rev Microbiol 44(3):351–370
  7. Goto M, Honda E, Ogura A, Nomoto A, Hanaki K (2009) Colorimetric detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by using hydroxy naphthol blue. Biotechniques 46(3):167–172
  8. Holland TL, Arnold C, Fowler VG Jr (2014) Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a review. JAMA 312(13):1330–1341
  9. Jin L, Zhao C, Li H, Wang R, Wang Q, Wang H (2021) Clinical profile, prognostic factors, and outcome prediction in hospitalized patients with bloodstream infection: results from a 10-Year prospective multicenter study. Front Med (Lausanne) 8:629671
  10. Lazcka O, Del Campo FJ, Muñoz FX (2007) Pathogen detection: a perspective of traditional methods and biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 22(7):1205–1217
  11. Li C, Shi Y, Yang G, Xia XS, Mao X, Fang Y, Zhang AM, Song Y (2019) Establishment of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Exp Ther Med 17(1):131–136
  12. Liu D, Zhu Y, Li N, Lu Y, Cheng J, Xu Y (2020) A portable microfluidic analyzer for integrated bacterial detection using visible loop-mediated amplification. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 310
  13. Maeda H, Kokeguchi S, Fujimoto C, Tanimoto I, Yoshizumi W, Nishimura F, Takashiba S (2005) Detection of periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis by loop-mediated isothermal amplification method. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 43(2):233–239
  14. Miyamoto S, Sano S, Takahashi K, Jikihara T (2015) Method for colorimetric detection of double-stranded nucleic acid using leuco triphenylmethane dyes. Anal Biochem 473:28–33
  15. Mori Y, Nagamine K, Tomita N, Notomi T (2001) Detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289(1):150–154
  16. Mori Y, Kitao M, Tomita N, Notomi T (2004) Real-time turbidimetry of LAMP reaction for quantifying template DNA. J Biochem Biophys Methods 59(2):145–157
  17. Mori Y, Notomi T (2009) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother 15(2):62–69
  18. Mwaigwisya S, Assiri RA, O'Grady J (2015) Emerging commercial molecular tests for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15(5):681–692
  19. Naber CK (2009) Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management Strategies. Clin Infect Dis 48(s4):S231–S237
  20. Nagamine K, Watanabe K, Ohtsuka K, Hase T, Notomi T (2001) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction using a nondenatured template. Clin Chem 47(9):1742–1743
  21. Nie X (2005) Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification of DNA for Detection of Potato virus Y. Plant Dis 89(6):605–610
  22. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28(12):E63
  23. Notomi T, Mori Y, Tomita N, Kanda H (2015) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. J Microbiol 53(1):1–5
  24. Oliveira D, Borges A, Simões M (2018) Staphylococcus aureus toxins and their molecular activity in infectious diseases. Toxins 10(6):252
  25. Otto M (2014) Staphylococcus aureus toxins. Curr Opin Microbiol 17:32–37
  26. Paule SM, Pasquariello AC, Thomson RB Jr, Kaul KL, Peterson LR (2005) Real-time PCR can rapidly detect methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus directly from positive blood culture bottles. Am J Clin Pathol 124(3):404–407
  27. Prusty BR, Chaudhuri P, Chaturvedi VK, Saini M, Mishra BP, Gupta PK (2016) Visual Detection of Brucella spp. in Spiked Bovine Semen Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay. Indian J Microbiol 56(2):142–147
  28. Sheet OH, Grabowski NT, Klein G, Abdulmawjood A (2016) Development and validation of a loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mastitis milk samples. Mol Cell Probes 30(5):320–325
  29. Sowmya N, Thakur MS, Manonmani HK (2012) Rapid and simple DNA extraction method for the detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus directly from food samples: comparison of PCR and LAMP methods. J Appl Microbiol 113(1):106–113
  30. Tanner NA, Zhang Y, Evans TC Jr (2015) Visual detection of isothermal nucleic acid amplification using pH-sensitive dyes. Biotechniques 58(2):59–68
  31. Thakur R, Singh R, Kaur S, Gill J (2018) Comparative evaluation of loop mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Anim Sci 88(9):1003–1009
  32. Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG (2015) Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 28(3):603–661
  33. Wan L, Gao J, Chen T, Dong C, Li H, Wen YZ, Lun ZR, Jia Y, Mak PI, Martins RP (2019) LampPort: a handheld digital microfluidic device for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Biomed Microdevices 21(1):9
  34. Wang H, Hecht S, Kline D, Leber AL (2019) Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistance detection directly from pediatric samples using PCR assays with differential cycle threshold values for corroboration of methicillin resistance. J Microbiol Methods 159:167–173
  35. Wastling SL, Picozzi K, Kakembo AS, Welburn SC (2010) LAMP for human African trypanosomiasis: a comparative study of detection formats. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4(11):e865
  36. Wong YP, Othman S, Lau YL, Radu S, Chee HY (2018) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a versatile technique for detection of micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol 124(3):626–643
  37. Yan M, Li W, Zhou Z, Peng H, Luo Z, Xu L (2017) Direct detection of various pathogens by loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on bacterial culture and bacterial colony. Microb Pathog 102:1–7
  38. Zhang H, Xu Y, Fohlerova Z, Chang H, Iliescu C, Neuzil P (2019) LAMP-on-a-chip: Revising microfluidic platforms for loop-mediated DNA amplification. Trends Analyt Chem 113:44–53
  39. Zhao X, Li Y, Park M, Wang J, Zhang Y, He X, Forghani F, Wang L, Yu G, Oh DH (2013) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay targeting the femA gene for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical and food samples. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23(2):246–250
  40. Zheng Y, Chen H, Yao M, Li X (2018) Bacterial pathogens were detected from human exhaled breath using a novel protocol. J Aerosol Sci 117:224–234
  41. Zhou W, Wu R, Duraiswamy S, Wang W, Wang Z (2021) Development of microfluidic cartridge for culture-free detection of staphylococcus aureus in blood. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering