1.) Gascon C, Brooks TM, Contreras-MacBeath T, Heard N, Konstant W, Lamoreux J, et al. The importance and benefits of species. Current Biology. 2015;25:431-438.
2.) Elzinga CL, Salzer DW, Willoughby JW. Measuring and monitoring plant populations. In: USDI-BLM Technical Reference 1730-1. Denver, Co: USDI-BLM; 1998.
3.) Herrick JE, Van Zee JW, Havstad KM, Burkett LM, Whitford WG. Monitoring manual for grassland, shrubland, and savanna ecosystems volume II. Las Cruces, NM and Tucson, AZ: USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range and University of Arizona Press; 2005
4.) Garrard GE, Bekessy SA, McCarthy MA, Wintle BA. When have we looked hard enough? A novel method for setting minimum survey effort protocols for flora surveys. Austral Ecology. 2008;33:986-998.
5.) Morrison LW. Observer error in vegetation surveys: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2015;9:367-379.
6.) Thomsen P, Willerslev E. Environmental DNA- An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation. 2015;183:4-18.
7.) Taberlet P, Bonin A, Zinger L, Coissac E. Environmental DNA for biodiversity research and monitoring. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom; 2018.
8.) Ruppert KM, Kline RJ, Rahman MS. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: a systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2019;17:e00547.
9.) Evans DM, Kitson JJN, Lunt DH, Straw NA, Pocock MJO. Merging DNA metabarcoding and ecological network analysis to understand and build resilient terrestrial ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 2016;30:1904-1916.
10.) Jerde CL, Mahon AR. Chadderton WL. Lodge DM. “Sight-unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conservation Letters. 2011;4:150-157.
11.) Dejea, TA, Valentini A, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bellemain E, Miaud C. Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2012;499:953-959.
12.) Smart AS, Tingley R, Weeks AR, van Rooyen AR, McCarthy MA. Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader. Ecological Applications. 2015;25:1944-1952.
13.) Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters. 2008;4:423-425.
14.) Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Honjo M, Kawabata Z. Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology. 2012;13:193-197.
15.) Taberlet P, Prud’Homme SM, Campione E, Roy J, Miquel C, Shehzad W, et al. Soil sampling and isolation of extracellular DNA from large amount of starting material suitable for metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology. 2012;21:1816-1820.
16.) Yoccoz NG, Brathen KA, Gielly L, Haile J, Edwards ME, Goslar T. et al. DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. Molecular Ecology. 2012;21:3647-3655.
17.) Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Binladen J, Brand TB, Gilbert TP, Shapiro B, et al. Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments. Science. 2003;300:791-795.
18.) Be NA, Thissen JB, Fofanov VY, Allen JE, Rojeas M, Golovko G, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the airborne environment in urban spaces. Microbial Ecology. 2015;69:346-355.
19.) Craine JM, Barberan A, Lynch RC, Menninger HL, Dunn RR, Fierer N. Molecular analysis of environmental plant DNA in house dust across the United States. Aerobiologia. 2016;33:71-86.
20.) Kraaijeveld K, De Wegner L, Garcia M, Buermans H, Frank J, Hiemstra P, et al. Efficient and sensitive identification and quantification of airborne pollen using next-generation DNA sequencing. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2015;15:8-16.
21.) Johnson MD, Cox RD, Barnes MA. The detection of a non-anemophilous plant species using airborne eDNA. PLoS One. 2019a;14:e0225262.
22.) Johnson MD, Cox RC, Barnes MA. Analyzing airborne envionrmental DNA: a comparison of extraction methods, primer type, and trap type on the ability to detect airborne eDNA from terrestrial plant communities. Environmental DNA. 2019b;1:176-185.
23.) Johnson, MD, Cox RC, Grisham BA, Lucia D, Barnes MA. Airborne eDNA reflects human activity and seasonal changes on a landscape scale. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2020;8:563431.
24.) Aalismail NA, Diaz-Rua R, Geraldi N, Cusack M, Duarte CM. Diversity and sources of airborne eukaryotic communities (AEC) in the global dust best over the red sea. Earth Systems and Environment. 2021;5:459-471.
25.) Behjati S, Tarpey PS. What is next generation sequencing? Archives of Disease in Childhood. Education and Practice Edition. 2013;98:236-238.
26.) Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, et al. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology. 2015;25:929-942.
27.) McClenaghan B, Fahner N, Cote D, Chawarski J, McCarthy A, Rajabi H, et al. Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236540.
28.) Parducci L, Matetovici I, Fontana SL, Bennett KD, Suyama Y, Haile J, et al. Molecular- and pollen-based vegetation analysis in lake sediments from central Scandinavia. Molecular Ecology. 2013;22:3511-3524.
29.) Korpelainen H, Pietilainen M. Biodiversity of pollen in indoor air samples as revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Nordic Journal of Botany. 2017;35:602-608
30.) Leontidou L, Vernesi C, De Groeve J, Cristofolini F, Vokou D, Cristofori A.DNA metabarcoding of airborne pollen: new protocols for improved taxonomic identification of environmental samples. Aerobiologia. 2017;34:63-74.
31.) Barnes MA, Turner CR. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics. 2016;17:1-17.
32.) Lodge DM, Simonin PW, Burgiel SW, Keller RP, Bossenbroek KM, Jerde CL, et al. Risk analysis and bioeconomics of invasive species to inform policy and management. Annual Review of Envionrmental Resources. 2016;41:453-488.
33.) Rupper KM, Kline RJ, Rahman MS. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring and applications of global eDNA. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2019;17:e00547.
34.) Global Invasive Species Database (GISD). Species profile: Salsola tragus. 2021. http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=605 on 07-07-2021.
35.) Clare EL, Economou CK, Faulkes CG, Gilbert JD, Bennett F, Drinkwater R, et al. eDNAir: proof of concept that animal DNA can be collected from air sampling. PeerJ. 2021;9:e11030.
36.) Keller A, Danner N, Grimmer G, Ankenbran M, von der Ohe K, von der Ohe W, et al. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples. Plant Biology. 2015;17:558-566.
37.) Lacoursiere-Roussel A, Howland K, Normandeau E, Grey EK, Archambault P, Deiner K, et al. eDNA metabarcoding as a new surveillance approach for coastal Arctic biodiversity. Ecology and Evolution. 2018;8:7763-7777.
38.) Varotoo C, Pindo M, Bertoni E, Casarotto C, Camin F, Girardi M, et al. A piolet study of eDNA metabarcoding to estimate plant biodiversity by an alpine glacier core (Adamello glacier, North Italy). Scientific reports. 2021;11:1208.
39.) Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581-583.
40.) Coghlan SA, Shafer AB, Freeland JR. Development of an environmental DNA metabarcoding assay for aquatic vascular plant communities. Environmental DNA. 2021;3:372-387.
41.) Thomsen PF, Sigsgaard EE. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of wild flowers reveals diverse communities of terrestrial arthropods. Ecology and Evolution.2018;9:1665-1679.
42.) Klymus KE, Richter CA, Thompson N, Hinck JE, Jones JW. Metabarcoding assays for the detection of freshwater mussels (Unionida) with environmental DNA. Environmental DNA. 2020;3:231-247.
43.) USDA, NRCS. 2021. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 07/26/2021). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC USA.