3.1 Change in the Trigger Bond
Research results show that as the cocrystal trigger bond becomes longer, the BDEs and the strength of the trigger bond decreases and the cocrystal sensitivity increases [28]. The changes of the three cocrystal sensitivity were explored by studying the variation of the N-NO2 trigger bond length under the external electric field. The variation of trigger bond length is shown in Table 1. Under the positive electric field, as the electric field intensity increases, the trigger bonds of the three cocrystal molecules all become longer, indicating that their sensitivity becomes higher. Under the negative electric field, the situation is reversed.
To clearly show the influence of the external electric field on the trigger bond length, a linear fit was performed on the change of the trigger bond length in the external electric field, the fitting results of the
of the three cocrystals under the electric field are shown in Fig. 2. The linear correlation coefficients R2 are 0.976 (CL-20/1,4-DNI), 0.958 (CL-20/2,4-MDNI), 0.977 (CL-20/4,5-MDNI), respectively, which shows that
has a good correlation with electric field intensity.
Table.1 The trigger bond length of energetic cocrystal molecules under different electric fields.

To further explore the influence of the external electric field on the cocrystal sensitivity, the bond dissociation energy (EBDE) and interaction energy (Eint) of the three cocrystal molecules were calculated. The calculation results are shown in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that under the external electric field, the variation trend of the Eint of the three cocrystal molecules is different, indicating that there are certain limitations in judging the cocrystal sensitivity from the Eint. As the positive electric field intensity increases, the EBDE of trigger bonds is smaller and the cocrystal sensitivity is higher. When the negative electric field intensity increases, the EBDE of trigger bonds increases and the cocrystal sensitivity decreases. Under the external electric field, the order of the EBDE of the three cocrystals is as follows: CL-20/2,4-MDNI (48.88 kcal·mol-1)>CL-20/1,4-DNI (47.37 kcal·mol-1)>CL-20/4,5-MDNI (44.37 kcal·mol-1). Therefore, the order of the sensitivity of the three cocrystals is: CL-20/4,5-MDNI>CL-20/1,4-DNI>CL-20/2,4-MDNI. The order of sensitivity obtained by calculating the EBDE is consistent with the order of sensitivity obtained by ESP analysis.
Table.2 Bond dissociation energy and interaction energy of energetic cocrystal materials under different electric fields.

3.2 Frontier Molecular Orbitals
The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest occupied molecular orbital (LUMO) are two important aspects of the frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) [29]. In addition to the orbitals, the energy gap between HOMO and LUMO also has important physical significance. It can determine the dynamic stability, chemical reactivity and optical polarizability of high-energy materials. The distribution of the HOMO and LUMO of CL-20/1,4-DNI, CL-20/2,4-MDNI and CL-20/4,5-MDNI along with their energy 8 gap is presented in Fig.3. It can be seen from Fig 3(a) that in most cases, the LUMO of CL-20/1,4-DNI is mainly distributed around the nitro group of 1,4-DNI, except when the electric field is -0.005 a.u., at this time LUMO is distributed around the nitro group of CL-20. HOMO is mainly distributed on the imidazole ring of 1,4-DNI, except when the electric field is +0.01 a.u., at this time HOMO is distributed around the nitro group of CL-20. For CL-20/2,4-MDNI, LUMO is mainly distributed on the nitro group of 2,4-MDNI in most cases. In the positive electric field, HOMO is mainly distributed on the nitro group of CL-20. In the negative electric field and no electric field, HOMO is mainly distributed on the imidazole ring of 2,4-MDNI. For CL-20/4,5-MDNI, in any electric field, LUMO is mainly distributed on the nitro group of 4,5-MDNI and HOMO is mainly distributed on the imidazole ring of 4,5-MDNI. Previous studies have shown that FMOs has a greater impact on chemical reactivity [30]. The larger the energy gap of HOMO and LUMO, the lower the chemical activity and the more stable the molecule. The average energy gaps of the three cocrystals are 4.366 eV (CL-20/1,4-DNI), 3.84 eV (CL-20/2,4-MDNI), 4.362 eV (CL-20/4,5-MDNI), respectively. Therefore, among the three cocrystals, CL-20/2,4-MDNI has the highest sensitivity.
3.3 Electrostatic Potential
ESP is an important physical characteristic for studying the interaction, charge distribution and chemical reactivity on the surface of molecules [31]. This section uses the Multiwfn [32] software to calculate the surface ESP of three cocrystal molecules under the external electric field, as shown in Fig.4~6. The maximum surface ESP, minimum surface ESP and the extreme values of the local positive ESP of the trigger bond are shown in Table 3.
It can be seen from Table 3 that with the increase of the electric field intensity, the maximum and minimum surface ESP of CL-20/2,4-MDNI and CL-20/4,5-MDNI both increases. The change of surface ESP value is consistent with the figure of cocrystal surface ESP, which shows that the electric field has a significant effect on the movement of the charge [33]. Under the external electric field, combining Fig.4~6 and Fig.7, part of the blue area of CL-20/1,4-DNI and CL-20/4,5-MDNI turns red, indicating that part of the negative ESP has changed to positive ESP. Under the positive electric field, as the electric field intensity increases, the negative ESP on the molecular surface of CL-20/2,4-MDNI also transforms into the positive ESP. Under the negative electric field, the situation is reversed. All the above changes indicate that the change of cocrystal charge distribution brings about the change of cocrystal sensitivity.
Politzer and Murray [34] point out that the smaller the local positive ESP (Vs·max) of the trigger bond, the lower the sensitivity of the energetic material and the more stable the energetic material. To explore the change of the trigger bond under the external electric field, the local positive ESP of the trigger bonds of the cocrystal molecules are shown in Table 3. The obtained results show that as the intensity of the positive electric field gradually increases, Vs·max also increases, so the cocrystal sensitivity gradually increases. Therefore, the order of the sensitivity of the three cocrystals is: CL-20/4,5-MDNI>CL-20/1,4-DNI>CL-20/2,4-MDNI.
Table.3 The maximum/minimum surface electrostatic potential and trigger bond local positive electrostatic potential extreme value of cocrystals at different electric field.

3.4 Nitro Group Charge
Existing studies [35] have shown that the charge of the nitro group of an energetic material is a non-negligible factor affecting its sensitivity. The more negative charge the group has, the lower the sensitivity of the energetic material, otherwise the higher the sensitivity. It can be seen from Table 4 that with the increase of the positive electric field intensity, the charge of the nitro group gradually decreases, and the sensitivity of the cocrystal molecule decreases [36]. When a negative electric field is applied, as the electric field intensity gradually increases, the charge of the nitro group gradually increases, indicating that the sensitivity of the cocrystal molecule increases.
Table.4 Nitro group charge of cocrystal molecules under different external electric fields.

In order to explore the variation of the nitro group charge (△𝑄𝑁𝑂2 ) under the electric field, a linear fitting was performed on the change of the nitro group charge in the electric field. As shown in Fig.8, the linear correlation coefficients of the three cocrystals are 0.996 (CL-20/1,4-DNI), 0.989 (CL-20/2,4-MDNI) and 0.965 (CL-20/4,5-MDNI), respectively. There is a good linear correlation between the charge change of the nitro group and the external electric field, indicating that the external electric field has a significant influence on the charge of the nitro group and the sensitivity of the energetic cocrystals [37].