3.1 Patients Characteristics
This study included 188 eyes of 97 type 2 diabetes subjects. Six eyes were excluded on account of QI less than 6. There were 144 eyes (72 patients) in no-DR group, 44 eyes (25patients) in mild NPDR group. Seventy eyes of 35 age matched healthy controls were also included. The mean age of the control group was 53±11 years; the no-DR group,53±10 years; and the mild NPDR group,57±9 years. The mean duration of diabetes was 9.2±6.0 years for the no-DR group and 14.4±9.1 years for the mild NPDR group (p < 0.05). There was significant difference in the HbA1C between the 2 groups (9.1±1.9% versus 5.6±0.3%, in diabetic and control group p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure(SBP) in diabetic group was higher than that in control group(128±19mmHg versus 116±8mmHg, p< 0.001). There was no difference in creatinine and total cholesterol between diabetic group and control group. (Table 1)
Table 1: Characteristics of the Study Participants
|
DM
|
Control group
|
no-DR
(N=72)
|
mild-NPDR
(N=25)
|
t
|
p*
|
Total
(N=97)
|
N=35
|
T
|
P**
|
Age(years)
|
53±10
|
57±9
|
1.725
|
0.088
|
54±10
|
53±11
|
0.586
|
0.559
|
DM duration
(years)
|
9.2±6.0
|
14.4±9.1
|
2.694
|
0.011
|
10.5±7.3
|
NA
|
14.169
|
<0.001
|
SBP(mmHg)
|
127±12
|
136±19
|
2.386
|
0.023
|
128±19
|
116±8
|
5.017
|
<0.001
|
HbA1c(%)
|
8.9±1.8
|
9.5±2.2
|
1.186
|
0.239
|
9.1±1.9
|
5.6±0.3
|
9.102
|
<0.001
|
Fasting blood Glucose(moll/l)
|
8.1±2.7
|
7.9±2.6
|
-0.391
|
0.696
|
8.0±2.6
|
5.2±0.4
|
9.728
|
<0.001
|
Cr(umol/l)
|
60.2±24.8
|
70.7±32.0
|
1.658
|
0.101
|
63±27
|
55±11
|
1.463
|
0.146
|
TC(mmol/l)
|
4.1±1.0
|
4.1±1.1
|
0.001
|
1.0
|
4.1±1.1
|
4.4±0.9
|
-1.584
|
0.116
|
SBP:Systolic blood pressure; Cr: creatinine; TC: total cholesterol.
* Comparison between the no-DR and DR groups with independent samples t-test.
** Comparison between the DM (total) and control groups with independent samples t-test
3.2 OCTA parameter and RNFL thickness in diabetic group were compared with those in normal control group.
The diabetic group showed a significantly (P < 0.001) lower VD in the superficial and deep retinal vascular layer in the parafoveal and the whole region as compared with the normal group. Additionally, the FD-300 was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in the diabetic group than that in the normal group. The AI value in the diabetic group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group. The area of FAZ in the diabetic group was slightly larger than that in the normal control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.583). From the normal control group to the no-DR group and then to the mild NPDR group, the VD of the superficial and deep retinal vascular layer and FD-300 decreased gradually, and there was significant difference among the three groups. The comparison of one- way ANOVA test with post hoc pairwise comparison showed that there were significant differences each groups (P <0.001). There was no significant difference in the size of FAZ (P = 0.659) among three groups. AI increased gradually, and there was significant difference among the three groups (1.14 ±0.05 vs. 1.16 ±0.06vs1.20 ±0.08, F=13.101, P<0.001). (Table2,Figure1).
The thickness of RNFL in the superior and temporal side of optic disc were significantly lower in the diabetic group than that in the normal group(p<0.05).Interestingly, the temporal RNFL thickness of optic disc in the normal group and mild NPDR group was significantly larger than that in the no-DR group, but there was no significant difference in superior, inferior and nasal RNFL thickness.(Table3,Figure1).
Because of the significant difference of SBP among groups, we used SBP as covariate, grouping as fixed factor,VD and RNFL as dependent variables. The results showed that SBP had no significant effect on VD and RNFL.(Table 4)
Table 2: Comparisons of OCTA parameter in retina between normal group and diabetes with or without retinopathy group.
|
DM
|
Control group
|
|
Number
|
no-DR
(N=144)
|
mild-NPDR
(N=44)
|
P*
|
Total
(N=188)
|
N=70
|
P**
|
p***
|
Superficial Whole VD(%)
|
44.4±4.1
|
40.4±5.2
|
<0.001
|
43.4±4.7
|
46.5±2.6
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
Superficial parafoveal VD(%)
|
47.3±4.4
|
42.8±5.5
|
<0.001
|
46.3±5.1
|
49.4±3.1
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
Deep whole VD(%)
|
49.1±3.7
|
45.3±4.5
|
<0.001
|
48.2±4.2
|
51.2±7.1
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
Deep parafoveal VD(%)
|
51.7±3.9
|
47.6±5.0
|
<0.001
|
50.7±4.5
|
53.8±7.4
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
FD-300(%)
|
47.7±4.6
|
43.5±5.4
|
<0.001
|
46.8±5.1
|
51.2±3.5
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
FAZ Area(um2)
|
0.35±0.17
|
0.38±0.13
|
0.466
|
0.36±0.16
|
0.37±0.28
|
0.583
|
0.659
|
AI
|
1.16±0.06
|
1.20±0.08
|
<0.001
|
1.17±0.06
|
1.14±0.05
|
<0.001
|
<0.001
|
VD: vessel density, FD-300: the foveal density, AI: the acircularity index
*Comparison between the no-DR and mild-NPDR groups by One- way ANOVA test with post hoc pairwise comparison .
**Comparison between the DM (total) and control groups by independent samples t-test
***Comparison among the no-DR, mild-NPDR and control groups by one-way ANOVA test
Table 3: Comparisons of RNFL thickness in disc between normal group and diabetes with or without retinopathy group.
|
DM
|
Control group
|
|
no-DR
(N=144)
|
mild-NPDR
(N=44)
|
p*
|
Total
(N=188)
|
N=70
|
p**
|
p***
|
Temporal (um)
|
72.5±10.4
|
78.6±12.9
|
0.001
|
73.9±11.3
|
78.1±10.6
|
0.008
|
<0.001
|
Nasal(um)
|
76.2±11.8
|
76.8±12.3
|
0.802
|
76.4±11.9
|
74.7±16.9
|
0.459
|
0.665
|
Superior (um)
|
122.8±16.7
|
122.5±22.1
|
0.918
|
122.7±18.1
|
128.4±15.3
|
0.020
|
0.068
|
Inferior (um)
|
129.5±15.8
|
129.9±19.9
|
0.897
|
129.6±16.8
|
132.9±19.1
|
0.171
|
0.389
|
Temporal: the RNFL thickness in temporal field of disc; Nasal: the RNFL thickness in nasal field of disc; Superior: the RNFL thickness in superior field of disc; Inferior: the RNFL thickness in inferior field of disc
*Comparison between the no-DR and mild-NPDR groups by One- way ANOVA test with post hoc pairwise comparison.
**Comparison between the DM (total) and control groups by independent samples t-test
***Comparison among the no-DR, mild-NPDR and control groups by one-way ANOVA test
Table 4: Covariance result of VD and RNFL
Dependent variable
|
Fixed factor
|
Covariate
|
p*
|
p**
|
Superficial Whole VD(%)
|
Group (DM vs Control)
|
SBP
|
<0.001
|
0.533
|
Superficial parafoveal VD(%)
|
<0.001
|
0.491
|
Deep whole VD(%)
|
<0.001
|
0.525
|
Deep parafoveal VD(%)
|
<0.001
|
0.618
|
FD-300(%)
|
<0.001
|
0.861
|
AI
|
<0.01
|
0.673
|
Temporal (um)
|
<0.05
|
0.997
|
Superior (um)
|
<0.05
|
0.634
|
*The independent effect of fixed factor on dependent variables.
**The effect of covariate on dependent variables.
3.3 Analysis of OCTA parameter and RNFL thickness in different blood glucose level group
After dividing into four groups according to HbA1c levels, we observed that with the increase of HbA1c, the decrease of FD-300 and VD gradually from the first group to the third group, but VD and FD-300 in the fourth group was slightly higher than those in the third group. Multiple comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in those OCTA parameters between the first group and the other three groups (P<0.01), but no statistically significant differences between the other three groups (P>0.05). The AI in the first group was significantly smaller than the other three groups(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in FAZ size between those groups(P>0.05). The temporal RNFL thickness of optic disc decreased gradually among groups with different HbA1c levels, but abnormally increased in group 3 (Table 5).
The Spearman correlation analysis showed there was a significant negative correlation between parafoveal ,whole vessel density of the deep retinal layer and FBG (r = -0.170,-0.163, P=0.006, P=0.009,respectively). RNFL thickness in temporal optic disc was positively correlated with the parafoveal VD in superficial layer(r=0.131,P<0.05).
Table 5: Comparisons of OCTA parameter of retina and the RNFL thickness of disc in 4 groups of the different HbA1c level.
|
Group1
(≤6.1%)
|
Group2
(6.1%~8.0%)
|
Group3
(8.0%~10%)
|
Group4
(>10%)
|
p***
|
Number
|
82
|
67
|
65
|
44
|
|
Superficial Whole VD(%)
|
46.2±2.9*
|
43.9±4.4
|
42.9±5.2
|
43.2±4.5
|
<0.001
|
Superficial parafoveal VD(%)
|
49.1±3.3*
|
46.9±4.8
|
45.4±5.5
|
46.1±4.8
|
<0.001
|
Deep whole VD(%)
|
51.2±6.5*
|
48.1±3.2
|
47.7±4.8
|
48.6±4.9
|
<0.001
|
Deep parafoveal VD(%)
|
53.7±6.9*
|
50.7±3.2
|
50.4±5.8
|
51.1±5.3
|
<0.001
|
FD-300(%)
|
50.8±3.8*
|
46.9±5.0
|
45.9±5.1
|
47.4±5.2
|
<0.001
|
FAZ Area(um2)
|
0.37±0.26
|
0.38±0.20
|
0.32±0.12
|
0.36±0.15
|
0.388
|
AI
|
1.14±0.05*
|
1.17±0.07
|
1.17±0.08
|
1.17±0.05
|
0.002
|
Temporal (um)
|
76.6±10.7**
|
73.7±9.0
|
77.6±13.5**
|
71.5±11.2
|
0.036
|
Nasal(um)
|
74.3±15.7
|
77.5±12.1
|
75.8±13.2
|
77.2±10.8
|
0.471
|
Superior (um)
|
127.1±14.8
|
123.9±19.7
|
123.8±17.7
|
119.7±18.0
|
0.165
|
Inferior (um)
|
131.7±18.2
|
129.5±18.5
|
130.1±16.9
|
129.9±15.8
|
0.921
|
*Comparison between the group1 and other groups by One- way ANOVA test with post hoc pairwise comparison with p<0.01
*Comparison between the group4 and other groups by One- way ANOVA test with post hoc pairwise comparison with p<0.05
***Comparison among 4 groups by one-way ANOVA test