Association of Daily Number of Steps with Walking Ability in Hospitalized Patients with Sub-acute Stroke

Increased physical activity is required in patients with stroke that are hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit. This study investigated the association between the daily number of steps and walking independence in order to determine the cutoff value of daily number of steps for walking independence in hospitalized patients with sub-acute stroke. This cross-sectional observational study included 85 stroke patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit. The average daily number of steps, 6-minute walk test, and Fugl-Meyer assessment of the lower extremities were measured at 30 days after stroke onset. The category of walking independence was classied using the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC). The subjects were divided into two groups according to the FAC score: a walking independence group (FAC ≥ 4) and a walking non-independence group (FAC ≤ 3). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association of daily number of steps with walking independence and a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to identify the cutoff value of daily number of steps for walking independence. The daily number of steps was independently associated with walking independence (odds ratio (OR); 1.001, 95% condence interval (CI); 1.001–1.002, p = 0.009). The cutoff value of daily number of steps for independent walking was 4286 steps (area under the curve = 0.914, sensitivity of 0.731, and specicity of 0.949). The daily number of steps was associated with independent walking in hospitalized patients with sub-acute stroke. The daily number of steps may be a useful target in rehabilitation for patients with sub-acute stroke.


Introduction
Physical activity is important for promoting functional recovery and secondary stroke prevention [1]; however, a previous study found that insu cient physical activity was higher in individuals with stroke than those without stroke [2]. Moreover, most of the patient's day was spent inactive (median 48.1%), alone (median 53.7%), and in their bedroom (median 56.5%) in hospitalized stroke patients [3]. In a rehabilitation unit, hospitalized sub-acute stroke patients took fewer steps than chronic home-living stroke patients [4]. Light intensity physical activity was associated with improved walking independence [5] and physical activity time was associated with activities of daily living (ADL) score [6] in rehabilitation unit stroke patients. Hence, increasing the physical activity might be required in patients with stroke hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit.
Improved walking ability is a rehabilitation goal for stroke patients hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit [7]. Previous studies showed that walking independence and the amount of physical activity had a strong relationship with each other in patients with stroke hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit [5,8]. However, these studies had a small sample size and did not fully adjust for confounding factors. To our knowledge, the cutoff value of physical activity for walking independence has not been investigated. As intensity-based physical activity differed due to walking ability in patients with stroke hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit [9], the cutoff value for walking independence may be a useful target in clinical settings.

Page 3/13
The objective of this study was to investigate the association of daily number of steps with walking independence and to identify the cutoff value of daily number of steps for walking independence in patients with sub-acute stroke admitted to the rehabilitation unit.

Study design and subjects
In this cross-sectional study, the part of the data set from the previous study was used [10], because the daily number of steps were measured from October 2017. Consecutive stroke patients who were admitted to the rehabilitation unit at Itami Kousei Neurosurgical Hospital between October 2017 and September 2019. Eligibility criteria were those who were admitted to the rehabilitation unit within 30 days from stroke onset, could walk alone, and could walk with an intermittent or continuous light touch to assist balance or coordination (Functional Ambulation Category [FAC] ≥ 2). Exclusion criteria were as follows: pre-stroke modi ed Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2; patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage; a history of severe musculoskeletal, cardiopulmonary, or psychiatric disease that the physician considered to have affected the ability to walk; or inability to provide consent due to loss of consciousness, aphasia, dementia, or noncooperation. This study was approved by the Konan Women's University Research Committee (acknowledgment number: 2015020) and was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent. All research was performed in accordance with relevant guidelines or regulations.

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics
Age, sex, height, weight, stroke type (cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage), disease history, and pre-stroke mRS were recorded upon admission and discharge from the rehabilitation unit. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the body weight by the height squared (kg/m 2 ). Stroke severity using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was assessed at 30 days from stroke onset.

Outcome Measurement
Physical activity Physical activity was measured from thirty days after stroke onset. All patients wore the Fitbit One (Fitbit. Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) on their non-paresis foot [11,12] for six days continuously except when bathing. The step count has good test-retest reliability over a three-day monitoring period [13]. Thus, the average daily number of steps taken during the middle 4-day period of the 6 days was used as the value of daily physical activity. Fitbit One is a three-dimensional accelerometer that calculates steps taken, oors climbed, distance traveled, and sleep quality. It has been used for stroke patients with demonstrated accuracy [12]. FAC Patients were classi ed by category of walking independence using FAC [14] at 30 days after stroke onset and discharge from the rehabilitation unit by a physical therapist. The FAC has excellent reliability, good concurrent and predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with hemiparesis after stroke [15]. It has six levels (0 to 5) that are classi ed according to the walking ability based on the amount of physical support required as follows: nonfunctional ambulatory (FAC 0); ambulatory [level II], continuous manual contact to support the body weight and maintain balance or to assist with coordination (FAC 1); ambulatory [level I], intermittent or continuous light touch to assist with balance or coordination (FAC 2); ambulatory, dependent on supervision (FAC 3); ambulatory, independent, level surface only (FAC 4); and ambulatory, independent (FAC 5).
Fugl-Meyer assessment of the lower extremities Lower extremity motor impairment following stroke was assessed using the lower limb Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) [16] at thirty days after stroke onset. The lower limb FMA score ranges from 0 (hemiplegia) to a maximum of 34 points. Seventeen items are included in the lower limb FMA and each item is scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, and 2 = performs fully). The lower limb FMA is best administered by a trained physical therapist.

Six-minute walk test
The 6MWT was used to evaluate the walking endurance at thirty days after stroke onset. A 30-m indoor walkway was used to conduct the test according to the ATS guidelines [17]. Patients were then instructed to walk from the starting line to the end of the walkway as many times as possible in 6 minutes. Patients were allowed to use their usual assistive devices and intermittent assistance for fall prevention was provided as necessary. During the test, patients were permitted to slow down, stop, and rest by leaning against the wall as necessary, but they resumed walking as soon as possible. Feedback was given and the distance covered at the end of the 6MWT was recorded.

Rehabilitation program
The description of the rehabilitation program was considered using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist and guide [18]. All patients underwent the conventional rehabilitation approaches from the day of admission or several days later. The rehabilitation program consisted of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language-hearing therapy, and was mainly composed of weight resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, gait exercise, ADL exercise, and upper extremity exercise to improve the patients' independence in ADL. Electrical stimulation therapy, orthotic therapy, walking aids, and ergometers were used as needed. All patients underwent 40-60 minute sessions of supervised rehabilitation 2-3 times a day, 7 times a week in the rehabilitation room.

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics are presented as numbers (percentages) and median (interquartile range [IQR)) in all subjects. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to check for normality. To investigate the difference between the daily number of steps and walking ability measured by FAC, One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was computed for parameters when normality was con rmed, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used when normality was not con rmed for continuous and ordinal variables following previous studies. Then, the subjects were divided into two groups according to the FAC score: a walking independence group (FAC ≥ 4) and a walking non-independence group (FAC ≤ 3). Logistic regression analysis was also performed to investigate the association of the daily number of steps with walking independence adjusted by age, sex, stroke type (cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage), NIHSS, lower extremity FMA, and 6MWT following previous studies [19,20]. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to establish the cutoff value of daily number of steps for walking independence. The area under the curve, sensitivity, and speci city were calculated to determine the optimal cutoff point. The optimal cutoff was determined using the Youden index, which was de ned as the maximum vertical distance between the ROC curve and the diagonal or chance line, and was calculated as the maximum sum of sensitivity and speci city minus one [21]. Signi cance was set at < 0.05; all analyses were performed using JMP version 10.0 software (SAS Institute Japan, Tokyo, Japan).

Results
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. A total of 233 patients with stroke were hospitalized during the study inclusion period. Of these patients, 148 were excluded from the study, and 85 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Normality of daily number of steps could not be con rmed, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to investigate the differences among FAC. The median daily number of steps was 3642 steps (IQR, 2406-6458 steps) in all subjects (Table 2). There were signi cant interaction effects between the daily number of steps and FAC (p < 0.001).   The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that walking independence was only associated with the daily number of steps (odds ratio, 1.001; 95% con dence interval, 1.001-1.002; p = 0.009) ( Table 3). Based on the ROC curve, the cutoff value of daily number of steps for walking independence was 4286 steps (area under the curve = 0.914, sensitivity of 0.731, and speci city of 0.949) (Fig. 1).

Discussion
We demonstrated that the daily number of steps was associated with walking independence after adjusting for confounding factors such as age, sex, stroke type, NIHSS, lower extremity FMA, and 6MWT. The cutoff value of the daily number of steps for walking independence was 4286 steps in patients with sub-acute stroke hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit. Previous studies found that increasing day-time physical activity was related to walking independence in patients with sub-acute stroke who could not walk alone [5], and gait independence increased the median percentage of time spent standing/walking [8] by stroke patients in the rehabilitation unit, which partially support our results. However, to our knowledge, the cutoff value of the number of steps for walking independence has not been investigated. In a previous study, the cutoff value of 6MWT for determining walking independence was 304 m [10] and the cutoff value of lower extremity FMA for predicting walking independence was 22.5 points [22]. As improving the walking ability is one of the goals of rehabilitation [7], combining the cutoff value of the number of steps in our results with that of other motor performance tests may be useful to facilitate early walking independence. Further studies with longitudinal designs are required to clarify the causal relationship between the daily number of steps and walking independence in stroke patients.
We presented the reference values of the number of steps according to FAC in patients with sub-acute stroke in the rehabilitation unit, were as follows: FAC 2 was 1970 steps/day (IQR, 1334.  [4]. Day-time physical activity differed according to severity measured by NIHSS in patients with acute stroke [24]. These results are partly consistent with our study ndings that the number of steps decreases with increasing disability after stroke. The number of steps in the walking independence group was 4518.5 steps/day (IQR, 2951.5-6511.0 steps/day) for FAC 4 and 6763.5 steps/day (IQR, 5382.8-10465.0 steps/day) for FAC 5. It was previously reported that 6025 steps per day is an initial target for reducing new vascular events after mild ischemic stroke [25]. The number of steps per day after discharge from the rehabilitation unit increased by 724 steps compared with during hospitalization in stroke patients [26]. In stroke patients with independent walking, preventing new vascular events is an important therapeutic target [25,27]. However, FAC 4 stroke patients did not reach the target level for reducing new vascular events. For these patients, improved walking ability for outdoor walking independence and promotion of physical activity may be required during hospitalization. In addition to physical function, environmental factors are involved in physical activity in community-dwelling stroke patients [28]. Thus, the factors associated with physical activity during hospitalization and after discharge may differ. Even patients with mild stroke who are able to walk outdoors independently may need consider environmental factors after discharge to maintain physical activity.
On the other hand, the number of steps in the walking non-independence group was 1970 steps/day (IQR, 1334.8-3105.3 steps/day) for FAC 2 and 2646 steps/day (IQR, 1669-3521 steps/day) for FAC 3. Klassen et al. reported that the number of steps during a physical therapy session was 580 (SD, 440) for usual care physical therapy, 2169 (SD, 1106) for more than double the intensity of the control, and 4747 (SD, 2083) for more than quadruple the intensity of the control, and walking recovery was improved in the higher dose group [29]. Patients with FAC 2.3 in our study did not reach the values of the previous study; however there is still a possibility of improvement. In addition, daytime and non-therapy time light intensity physical activity were related to functional recovery in patients with sub-acute stroke who could not walk independently [5]. Thus improvement of the walking ability in patients with poor walking ability and increasing the number of steps during therapy time and light intensity physical activity during nontherapy time are important methods for recovering the walking ability.

Study limitations
There were several limitations in the current study. First, the average daily number of steps taken was used as the measure of physical activity; however, the Fitbit One mean error was higher for slower velocities (10.9% for speeds < 0.4 m/s) [12]. Thus, there may have been measurement errors of physical activity in stroke patients with low walking ability. Second, the daily number of steps was measured at 30 days after stroke onset in patients who were admitted to the rehabilitation unit. Thus, these results may only be applicable to stroke patients in the rehabilitation unit and not to acute stroke or communitydwelling chronic stroke patients. In addition, we could not measure long-term outcomes such as mRS or FAC at 3 or 6 months; thus the relationship between the number of steps at 30 days from stroke onset and long-term outcome was not clari ed. Third, this was a cross-sectional study, and the causal relationship between the daily number of steps and walking independence was unknown. Thus, further studies with a longitudinal design are required to clarify the causal relationship between the daily number of steps and walking independence. Fourth, although pre-stroke physical activity was associated with stroke severity and post-stroke outcome [30,31], pre-stroke physical activity or tness was not measured. Rehabilitation content affects physical activity; however, the contents of rehabilitation are not standardized because they are determined by each physician. Thus, these factors may affect the result of our study. Finally, this study did not use randomization or assignment; thus, there was a possibility of selection bias and lack of internal validity. Further studies with comparative validity designs are required.

Conclusion
This study demonstrated the association between the daily number of steps and walking ability, and calculated the cutoff value for walking independence in patients with sub-acute stroke hospitalized in the rehabilitation unit. A daily number of steps of 4286 steps/day may be useful for determining walking independence in patients with sub-acute stroke.
Declarations Figure 1 Receiver-operating characteristic curve of physical activity for determining walking independence.