This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research
Motion-Compensated FDG PET/CT for Oesophageal Cancer
Francine E.M. Voncken
Netherlands Cancer Institute: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-8547
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose
Respiratory-induced motion of oesophageal tumours and lymph nodes can influence positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The aim was to compare standard three-dimensional (3D) and motion-compensated PET/CT regarding standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and detection of lymph node metastases.
Methods
This prospective observational study (NCT02424864) included thirty-seven newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer patients. Diagnostic PET/CT was reconstructed in 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. MTVs of the primary tumour were calculated using an automated region-growing algorithm with SUV thresholds of 2.5 (MTV2.5) and ≥50% of SUVmax (MTV50%). Blinded for reconstruction method, a nuclear medicine physician assessed all lymph nodes showing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake for their degree of suspicion.
Results
The mean (95% CI) SUVmax of the primary tumour was 13.1(10.6-15.5) versus 13.0(10.4-15.6) for 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT, respectively. MTVs were also similar between the two techniques. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences between both measurements (95% limits of agreement) of 0.08(-3.60 - 3.75), -0.26(-2.34 – 1.82), 4.66(-29.61 – 38.92)cm3 and -0.95(-19.9 – 18.0)cm3 for tumour SUVmax, lymph node SUVmax, for MTV2.5 and MTV50%, respectively. Lymph nodes were classified as highly suspicious (30/34 nodes), suspicious (20/22) and dubious (66/59) for metastases on 3D/motion-compensated PET/CT. No additional lymph node metastases were found on motion-compensated PET/CT. SUVmax of the most intense lymph nodes was similar for both scans: mean (95% CI) 6.6(4.3-8.8) and 6.8(4.5-9.1) for 3D and motion-compensated, respectively.
Conclusions
SUVmax of the primary oesophageal tumour and lymph nodes was comparable on 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. The use of motion-compensated PET/CT did not improve lymph node detection.
Trial registration
(www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02424864)
Keywords
Oesophageal cancer, Radiotherapy, Threshold-based delineation, Positron-emission tomography computed tomography, Four-dimensional computed tomography, Motion-compensated, Lymph node detection, Standardized uptake value, Gross tumour volume, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 28 Sep, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Oncology
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research
Motion-Compensated FDG PET/CT for Oesophageal Cancer
Francine E.M. Voncken
Netherlands Cancer Institute: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-8547
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 28 Sep, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Oncology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose
Respiratory-induced motion of oesophageal tumours and lymph nodes can influence positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The aim was to compare standard three-dimensional (3D) and motion-compensated PET/CT regarding standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and detection of lymph node metastases.
Methods
This prospective observational study (NCT02424864) included thirty-seven newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer patients. Diagnostic PET/CT was reconstructed in 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. MTVs of the primary tumour were calculated using an automated region-growing algorithm with SUV thresholds of 2.5 (MTV2.5) and ≥50% of SUVmax (MTV50%). Blinded for reconstruction method, a nuclear medicine physician assessed all lymph nodes showing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake for their degree of suspicion.
Results
The mean (95% CI) SUVmax of the primary tumour was 13.1(10.6-15.5) versus 13.0(10.4-15.6) for 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT, respectively. MTVs were also similar between the two techniques. Bland-Altman analysis showed mean differences between both measurements (95% limits of agreement) of 0.08(-3.60 - 3.75), -0.26(-2.34 – 1.82), 4.66(-29.61 – 38.92)cm3 and -0.95(-19.9 – 18.0)cm3 for tumour SUVmax, lymph node SUVmax, for MTV2.5 and MTV50%, respectively. Lymph nodes were classified as highly suspicious (30/34 nodes), suspicious (20/22) and dubious (66/59) for metastases on 3D/motion-compensated PET/CT. No additional lymph node metastases were found on motion-compensated PET/CT. SUVmax of the most intense lymph nodes was similar for both scans: mean (95% CI) 6.6(4.3-8.8) and 6.8(4.5-9.1) for 3D and motion-compensated, respectively.
Conclusions
SUVmax of the primary oesophageal tumour and lymph nodes was comparable on 3D and motion-compensated PET/CT. The use of motion-compensated PET/CT did not improve lymph node detection.
Trial registration
(www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02424864)
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6