Nurses' perception of diabetes care needs in long-term facilities in Japan: A cross-sectional survey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17445/v1

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is one of the common aging-related diseases, and older people with diabetes are likely to have significant health issues. In long-term care facilities, nurses often face challenges in providing appropriate diabetes care for residents. This study aimed to describe the experience and perception of nurses in diabetes care at long-term care facilities.

Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was administered to 1371 nurses representing different facilities. A self-report questionnaire was used to collect data regarding demographic characteristics of participants, variables related to diabetes management, difficulties in diabetes care, and the recognition of educational opportunity needs in diabetes care as well as needs for diabetes care guidelines. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed to examine the associations among variables.

Results: Among participants, 88.7% owned registered nurse license and had an average experience of 10.4 years in long-term care facilities. Approximately 61% perceived difficulties in recognizing signs/symptoms of acute metabolic failure due to hyperglycemia, while about 37% of participants did in being aware of the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia. About 59% of participants perceived difficulties in managing blood glucose with respect to residents’ needs and preferences. Approximately 62% recognized educational opportunity needs and about 75% recognized the need for diabetes care guidelines suitable for long-term care facilities. These needs were related to the perception of difficulties, but not to variables related to diabetes management.

Conclusion: This study identified the specific areas in which nurses experienced difficulties in diabetes care for residents and revealed the areas in which an approach for improving confidence of nurses in diabetes care is needed as a priority. Moreover, educational opportunities and diabetes care guidelines are required to improve the quality of care for long-term care residents.

Background

Japan’s population shows the highest proportion of aging in the world. A recent report [1] showed that 27.7% of the population (35.2 million) is over 65, and 13.8% (17.5 million) is over 75. The level of functioning of the older population varies; ranging from well-functioning community dwelling adults to long-term care facility residents, the number of people requiring long-term care facility services is increasing [2].

Diabetes is a common aging related-disease. The report showed that the prevalence of diabetes increases with age; in Japan people with high risk of diabetes amount to 43% of people aged over 70, in contrast to 26% of those aged 50 to 59 and 35% of those aged 60 to 69 [3]. Diabetes can cause serious health consequences at any age, but older people with diabetes are more likely to develop significant health issues, comorbidities and negative health prognostics due to hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia [4–6]. The prevalence of diabetes in long-term care facilities in general range from 16 to 36% [7–10]. Further, older residents with diabetes have more complex problems. For example, previous studies showed that, as compared to residents without diabetes, residents with diabetes had higher chances of comorbidities, higher number of complications, infections and emergency room and hospital transfers [9,10].

Despite the growing evidence that older adults with diabetes are more likely to have complex health issues in long-term care facilities, there are few studies concerning nurse experience in diabetes care. Specifically, there is a lack of research on this issue in Japan. One study with 41 nurses revealed that they have insufficient knowledge of the diabetes care setting, especially signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia [11]. Another study with a healthcare staff including 36 nurses reported that nurses perceived themselves to be moderately to very knowledgeable and confident in diabetes care while also showing a high level of desire for further education about diabetes [12]. There is also a report on healthcare staff including 165 nurses of which the majority reported comfortable knowledge of the signs of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia as well as techniques for administering insulin, even though there was a different level of comfort between registered nurses and registered practical nurses [13].

These findings focused on the perception and knowledge of nurses working with long-term care residents with diabetes, but these were restricted to limited samples, making evidence on this issue still scarce and inconclusive. A lack of a clear understanding on how nurses perceive and experience diabetes care may negatively affect care quality since nurses play a fundamental role in ensuring resident safety and comfort. Further investigating in a broader sample and involving broader areas of diabetes care practices will guide the development of adequate and necessary approaches for diabetes care in a long-term care facility setting. The purpose of this study is to investigate the experience and perception of diabetes care of nurses in long-term care facilities. Specifically, it focuses on perception of difficulties, needs of educational opportunities, of a diabetes care guideline, and related variables on a nationwide basis.

methods

Participants

A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted from February to March 2019 with nurses working at long-term care health facilities. In Japan, there are three types of facility services for older adults under the long-term care insurance system. Long-term care health facility is one of them and aims to provide rehabilitation and nursing care to older adults whose medical conditions are stable [2]. It has organizational standards for staffing: it is required to have a physician as well as other staff members such as nurse, care workers or therapists. We searched for long-term care health facilities in the official website of each prefecture in Japan and identified 4119 facilities. We then sent a letter explaining the goal of the study and the questionnaire to all if they agreed to participate. We asked them to select a nurse responsible for resident care in each facility to answer the questionnaire. The letter explained that we deemed consent to participate in the study when participants returned the questionnaire. Questionnaires were returned by 1371 nurses with a 33.3% response adherence. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics review board.

Measurements

The questionnaire was developed based on the literature [11,14,15] and on interviews of seven nurses who work in long-term care health facilities. The questionnaire included demographic characteristic of participants: gender, age, license owned and duration of experience in long-term care facilities. Variables related to diabetes management, including the current number of residents with diabetes, those with insulin injection, frequency of checking HbA1c for residents, existence of guidelines related to diabetes care, experience with transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia. Difficulties of diabetes care were assessed with nine items, which focused on understanding of the condition of diabetes, the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, foot/oral problems, collaborating with physicians and care workers, and respecting resident need, as described in Table 3. We assessed the level of difficulty using a Likert scale from 1(not difficult at all) to 4 (very difficult).

Finally, we included an assessment of the recognition of needs of educational opportunities. Participants were asked whether they wished to have educational opportunities of diabetes care, answering in yes or no. They were also asked whether they recognized the necessity of diabetes care guideline suitable to older adults with diabetes in long-term care health facility settings and they had to answer from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. The chi-square test was conducted to assess how each diabetes management variable was associated with difficulties, the need of educational opportunities and diabetes care guideline in practice. The need of diabetes care guideline was dichotomized into strongly agree and other responses because of the skewed distribution.

Results

Table 1 shows the nurses’ demographic data. About 94% were aged over 40 years and 88.7% owned registered nurse license. They had an average experience of 10.7 years in long-term care facilities. Variables related to diabetes management are described in Table 2. The number of residents with diabetes in facilities were 38.2% for less than 10 residents and 61.6% for 10 residents or more. Sixty-nine percent participants reported that there were any residents who required insulin injection. Any guideline related to diabetes care was available at 23.2%. Nurses who had experience transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were 35.5% and 32.4%, respectively.

Difficulties of diabetes care experienced by nurses are shown in Table 3. Of the nurses, 60.9% responded “very difficult or “somewhat difficult” with regard to identifying the signs/symptoms of acute metabolic failure due to hyperglycemia, while 36.8% did so regarding identifying the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia. Keeping blood glucose level in a healthy range while respecting residents’ needs and preferences was reported by 58.9% of participants. “Detecting and dealing with oral problems” and “developing the shared understanding of the care plan with care workers” were perceived as difficult by 43.6% and 47.8% respectively, while “detecting and dealing with foot problems” and “developing shared understanding of the care plan with care workers” were perceived as difficult by fewer nurses.

Table 4 displayed the needs of educational opportunities and for a diabetes care guideline. Approximately 62.7% desired to have educational opportunities for diabetes care, 30.8% responded “strongly agree”, and about 44.9% responded “agree” to the need of a guideline related to diabetes care in long-term facilities.

The associations between difficulties in diabetes care and variables related to diabetes management are displayed in Table 5. Most variables did not relate to difficulties except the number of residents with diabetes, that is, participants who responded that there were 10 or more residents with diabetes highly perceived difficulties in discussing with physicians and obtaining the necessary instructions regarding diabetes and keeping blood glucose level in a healthy range while respecting residents’ needs and preferences. Table 6 showed the results for the association with needs of educational opportunities and diabetes care guideline. For variables related to diabetes management, the following were associated with need of educational opportunities and diabetes care guideline: the number of residents with diabetes, residents with insulin injection, experience in transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hypoglycemia. Participants who had diabetes care guideline in their facilities highly perceived the need for such a guideline. For the items of difficulties, most variables, except detecting and dealing with the foot problems, were associated with needs of educational opportunities and diabetes care guideline.

discussion

This is the first nationwide survey revealing what nurses experienced and perceived in their practice related to diabetes care in long-term care facility settings. The result revealed several difficulties that need to be addressed with priority.

The highest prevalence of perceived difficulty was recognizing signs/symptoms of acute metabolic failure due to hyperglycemia, and it was reported to be more difficult than being aware of the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia is a major safety concern for older adults with diabetes because it is often difficult to recognize it due to fewer and unspecific symptoms and can lead to negative consequences [5]. However, severe hyperglycemia causes dehydration and hyperosmolarity and can lead to the development of critical conditions [4], and previous studies have reported that nurses have insufficient knowledge of hyperglycemia as compared to hypoglycemia [16]. The increase in the clinical assessment skill and confidence in dealing with hyperglycemia is important.

Another difficulty perceived as being high was maintaining the blood glucose level in a healthy range while respecting residents’ needs and preferences. This might be a new insight because previous studies on nurses’ perception and knowledge have seldom focused on such a difficulty. This result may reflect nurses’ conflict between treatment goals of managing glycemic control and respecting their preferences. Previous studies report that nursing home residents were burdened by restricted diets and fingerstick monitoring and there is a need to be aware of how the setting of long-term care facilities might facilitate diabetes management while on the other hand, it can possibly hinder resident autonomy [17]. In order to promote residents’ quality of life, eliciting residents’ preference and empowering them may be an important step, but a description of a specific approach is needed [17,18].

People with diabetes need to receive special attention to foot and oral care, because they are at higher risk of poor oral health [19] or problems with lower extremities, which sometimes complicate their comorbidities [15]. The results show that oral problems are perceived as more difficult than foot problems. This may be because, for older adults in general, poor oral health is reported to be associated with other serious conditions, such as malnutrition [20] and infectious conditions, including aspiration pneumonia [21]. Although the Japanese government has adapted insurance benefits for improvement of oral health management in long-term health care facilities, there are more issues involved, including relatively low claim rates and challenges of nursing practice [22,23]. All these might be related to more perceived difficulty in oral care.

Discussing with physicians and obtaining the necessary orders was found to be less difficult probably because of the existence of a physician in each facility. Approximately half of the nurses perceived the development of shared understanding of the care plan with care workers as being difficult, while about 30% perceived sharing information regarding diabetes with care workers as being difficult. Care plans mostly include nursing assessment and the specific information of physical status, treatment, or medication, such that sharing care plans with care workers is sometimes difficult because of different levels of knowledge and confidence stemming from different occupational purposes [12]. Good collaboration between nurses and care workers will promote care quality and hence that attention needs to be paid to developing some tools or strategies.

Most difficulties did not associate with variables related to diabetes management. This result indicates that the level of difficulty may not be dependent on these variables. Probably other factors, such as knowledge, or resources, might be more effective at raising diabetes care confidence [24]. More participants recognized needs of educational opportunities and diabetes care guidelines and these were associated with diabetes management, such as the current number of residents with diabetes, those requiring insulin injection, and experiences of emergency transfers due to hypoglycemia. Most difficulties were also related to these needs. These results indicate that nurses who face challenges and are required to make decisions on a daily basis experienced such needs in higher levels. Additionally, the results showed that participants who had diabetes care guidelines in facilities more easily perceived their importance, indicating that the presence of any standard recommendation helps their daily diabetes care practice.

There were several limitations to this study. First, the response rate was 33.3%, which is comparable to other nationwide studies [23], though low. Participants may differ from nonparticipants in that respondents may be more interested in diabetes care; thus, some caution is needed to interpret and generalize the results. Second, we did not mention details or content and the focus of the supposed guidelines. Furthermore, other variables, such as nurse knowledge or ratio of residents with cognitive impairment may be related to perceptions of difficulties and needs. Future studies that investigate the role of such variables are warranted to further explore the needs in diabetes care in long-term care facilities.

conclusions

This study examined the perception of difficulties in diabetes care among nurses in long-term care facilities and revealed the areas requiring some approaches for improving nurses’ confidence in diabetes care as a priority, e.g. recognizing signs/symptoms of acute metabolic failure due to hyperglycemia and managing blood glucose with respect to residents’ needs and preferences. Many nurses recognized the need for educational opportunities and diabetes care guidelines suitable for long-term care facilities and we found the association of perception of difficulties and these needs. Considering the high prevalence of older adults with diabetes, nurses are expected to be encouraged to avail the opportunities for increasing knowledge and confidence of diabetes care with their own effort, while there is a high need to provide environmental resources, such as access to standards, guidelines, or employer-supported educational opportunities.

declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted with the approval from the ethics review board of the Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University (18–57). The participants gave their informed consent by returning the written questionnaires, which were accompanied by a cover letter explaining the purpose of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

The data used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

This study was conducted with research support from Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Authors’ contributions

MS: Conceptualized and designed study, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. MY: Conceptualized and designed study, checked the proposal. SO: Conceptualized and designed study, interpretation of data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express our appreciation to the participants who agreed to participate in this research.

Authors’ information

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. 2 El Qol Heiwa, Sapporo, Japan.

references

  1. Cabinet Office Japan. Situation on Ageing Population. 2018. https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/english/annualreport/2018/2018pdf_e.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). Annual Health, Labour and Welfare Report 2017: Health and Welfare Services for the Elderly. 2017 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw11/index.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.
  3. Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare. The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan, 2016. 2017. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/dl/h28-houkoku.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.
  4. Kirkman S, Briscoe V, Clark N, Florez H, Haas L, Halter, J, et al. Diabetes in older adults: A consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(12):2242–56.
  5. Sircar M, Bhatia A, Munshi M. Review of hypoglycemia in the older adult: Clinical implications and management. Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(1):66–72.
  6. Bremer J, Jauch-Chara K, Hallschmid M, Schmid S, Schultes B. Hypoglycemia unawareness in older compared with middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(8):1513–17.
  7. Andreassen L, Sandberg S, Kristensen G, Sølvik U, Kjome R. Nursing home patients with diabetes: Prevalence, drug treatment and glycemic control. Diabetes Research and Cl. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2014;105(1):102–9.
  8. Lubart E, Segal R, Wainstein J, Marinov G, Yarovoy A, Leibovitz A. Evaluation of an intra-institutional diabetes disease management program for the glycemic control of elderly long-term care diabetic patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14(2):341–5.
  9. Dybicz S, Thompson S, Molotsky S, Stuart B. Prevalence of diabetes and the burden of comorbid conditions among elderly nursing home residents. Am J Geriatr Pharmocother. 2011;9(4):212–23.
  10. Newton C, Adeel S, Sadeghi-Yarandi S, Powell W, Migdal A, Smiley D, et al.. Prevalence, quality of care, and complications in long term care residents with diabetes: A multicenter observational study. JAMDA. 2013;14(11):842–6.
  11. Hu S, Yang Z, Chuang Y, Liu M. Registered nurses’ knowledge of medical care for older adults with diabetes in long-term care facilities in Taiwan. Collegian. 2018;25(3):271–5.
  12. Vincent C, Hall P, Ebsary S, Hannay S, Hayes-Cardinal L, Husein N. Knowledge confidence and desire for further diabetes-management education among nurses and personal support workers in long-term care. Can J Diabetes . 2016;40(3):226–33.
  13. Agarwal G, Sherifali D, Kaasalainen S, Dolovich L, Akhtar-Danesh N. Nurses’ perception and comfort level with diabetes management practices in long-term care. Can J Diabetes. 2014;38(5):314–19.
  14. Munshi M, Florez H, Huang E, Kalyani R, Mupanomunda M, Pandya N, et al. Management of diabetes in long-term care and skilled nursing facilities: A position statement of the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(2):308–18.
  15. Haas L. Special considerations for older adults with diabetes residing in skilled nursing facilities. Diabetes Spectrum. 2014;27(1):37–43.
  16. Patell R, Nigmatoulline D, Bena J, Kim D, Messinger-Rapport B, Lansang M. Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes in skilled nursing facilities. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(4):458–65.
  17. Barnhart C, McClymont K, Smith A, Au-Yeung A, Lee S. “Everyone else gets ice cream here more often than I do - It burns me up”- Perspectives on diabetes care from nursing home residents and their doctors. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):1–8.
  18. Andreassen L, Granas A, Sølvik U, Kjome R. “I try not to bother the residents too much” - the use of capillary blood glucose measurements in nursing homes. BMC Nurs. 2016;15(1):1–9.
  19. Huang D, Chan K, Young B. Poor oral health and quality of life in older U.S. adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(10):1782–88
  20. Van Lancker A, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Vanderwee K, Goossens J, Beeckman, D. The association between malnutrition and oral health status in elderly in long-term care facilities: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(12):1568–81.
  21. Shay K. Infectious complications of dental and periodontal diseases in the elderly population. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(9):1215–23.
  22. Kishimoto N, Stegaroiu R, Shibata S, Otsuka H, Ohuchi A. Income from nutrition and oral health management among long-term care insurance facilities in Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Gerodontology, 2018;55–62.
  23. Muramatsu M, Moriya S. A survey of nursing management of oral hygiene at long-term care facilities in Japan. Japanese Journal of Gerodontology. 2014;29(2):66–76. [in Japanese]
  24. Nikitara M, Constantinou C, Andreou E, Diomidous, M. The role of nurses and the facilitators and barriers in diabetes care: A mixed methods systematic literature review. Behavioral Sciences. 2019;9(6):61.

 

tables

Table 1  Participants demographic characteristics             N=1371

 

n

%

M±SD

Age

     

  20-29

8

0.6

 

  30-39

72

5.3

 

  40-49

381

28.1

 

  50-59

654

48.2

 

  Over 60

243

17.9

 

License owned

     

   Registered nurse

1194

88.7

 

   Licensed practical nurse only

152

11.3

 

Duration of experience in long term care facility/facilities (years)

 

 

10.4±7.0

Missing values excluded

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2  Variables related to diabetes management                           N=1371

 

n

%

M±SD

Current number of residents with diabetes

     

   None

3

0.2

 

   1-9

506

38.2

 

   10-19

594

44.8

 

   Over 20

223

16.8

 

Residents with insulin injection

     

   One or more (average number ± SD)

937

69.0

(2.7± 1.8)

   None

420

31.0

 

Frequency of checking HbA1c for residents who are in stable condition

     

   Once half year

923

72.0

 

   Irregularly

182

14.1

 

  Does not check

186

14.4

 

Any guidelines related to diabetes care

     

   Available

314

23.2

 

   Not available

1038

76.8

 

Experience transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hypoglycemia

     

   Yes

483

35.5

 

   No

878

64.5

 

Experience transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hyperglycemia

     

   Yes

441

32.4

 

   No

919

67.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table3  Difficulties of diabetes care                                          N=1371

 

Very difficult

Somewhat difficult

Not too difficult

Not difficult
at all

Not 

sure

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

1. Gain an understanding of the condition of diabetes including the state of complications

108

8.1

600

44.9

516

38.7

61

4.6

50

3.7

2. Being aware of the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia

41

3.0

456

33.8

709

52.6

126

9.3

16

1.2

3. Being aware of the signs/symptoms of acute metabolic failure due to hyperglycemia

167

12.4

651

48.5

438

32.6

64

4.8

22

1.6

4. Detecting and dealing with the foot problems

32

2.4

366

27.1

757

56.0

181

13.4

16

1.2

5. Detecting and dealing with the oral problems

74

5.5

515

38.1

617

45.6

113

8.4

33

2.4

6. Discussing with physicians and obtaining the necessary orders regarding diabetes

46

3.4

226

16.7

630

46.6

433

32.0

18

1.3

7. Sharing the information regarding diabetes with care workers

53

3.9

360

26.6

714

52.7

217

16.0

10

0.7

8. Developing the shared understanding of the care plan with care workers

104

7.7

542

40.1

567

42.0

131

9.7

7

0.5

9. Keep blood glucose level in healthy range while respecting residents’ needs and preferences

154

11.4

642

47.5

458

33.9

81

6.0

17

1.3

Missing values excluded

 

 

 

Table4  Need regarding diabetes care practice            N=1371

 

n

%

Education needs for diabetes care

   

   Yes

834

62.7

   No

497

37.3

Needs for guideline related to diabetes in long-term care facility

   

  Strongly agree

419

30.8

  Agree

610

44.9

  Neutral

264

19.4

  Disagree

64

4.7

  Strongly disagree

2

0.1

Missing values excluded

 

 

 

 

Table 5  Association with perception of difficulty                                           N=1371

 

 

Difficulty 6

Difficulty 9

 

 

Difficult

Not difficult

p

Difficult

Not difficult

p

Number of residents with diabetes

Less than 10

87

415

0.037

268

233

0.001

 

10 or more

179

631

 

508

301

 

Residents with insulin injection

None

78

333

0.483

239

171

0.699

 

One of more

192

738

 

552

377

 

Frequency of checking HbA1c for residents who are in stable conditions

Regularly

188

725

0.626

545

366

0.584

Irregularly

37

143

 

101

79

 
 

Do not check

32

151

 

105

78

 

Any guidelines related to diabetes care

Available

52

260

0.074

184

127

0.957

 

Not available

218

805

 

607

416

 

Experience transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hypoglycemia

Yes

97

383

0.967

293

186

0.215

No

175

695

 

502

368

 

Experience transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hyperglycemia

Yes

93

342

0.442

272

163

0.062

No

179

735

 

522

391

 

Other difficulties did not have any association with variable related to diabetes management.

Difficulty 6: Discussing with physicians and obtaining the necessary orders regarding diabetes.

Difficulty 9: Keeping blood glucose level in healthy range while respecting residents’ needs and preferences.

"Difficult" includes "very difficult" and "somewhat difficult"

"Not difficult" includes "not too difficult", "not difficult at all" and “not sure”

 

 

 

Table6  Association with needs of educational opportunity and diabetes care guideline             N=1371

   

Need for educational opportunity

Need for diabetes care guideline

 

 

Yes

No

p

Strongly agree

Other responses

p

Variables related to diabetes management

           

Number of residents with diabetes

Less than 10

284

210

0.002

129

376

0.001

10 or more

522

270

 

277

533

 

Residents with insulin injection

None

239

170

0.031

104

311

0.002

One of more

587

321

 

312

618

 

 Frequency of checking HbA1c for residents who are in stable condition

Regularly

563

334

0.643

287

629

0.741

Irregularly

116

61

 

59

122

 

Do not check

110

71

 

53

130

 

Any guidelines related to diabetes care

Available

195

111

0.666

113

199

0.012

Not available

628

379

 

296

733

 

 Experience to transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hypoglycemia

Yes

315

155

0.018

175

306

0.001

No

515

337

 

242

632

 

 Experience to transferring residents with diabetes to an emergency room due to hyperglycemia

Yes

285

145

0.059

145

295

0.223

No

544

349

 

272

644

 

Difficulties of diabetes care

             

1. Gain an understanding of the condition of diabetes including the state of complications

Difficult

456

227

0.003

247

457

0.001

Not difficult

361

254

 

168

458

 

2. Being aware of the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia

Difficult

323

162

0.023

171

325

0.030

Not difficult

498

328

 

244

603

 

3. Being aware of the signs/symptoms of acute metabolic failure due to hyperglycemia

Difficult

520

270

0.002

283

532

0.000

Not difficult

296

219

 

126

396

 

4. Detecting and dealing with the foot problems

Difficult

259

126

0.029

136

260

0.083

Not difficult

566

364

 

281

670

 

5. Detecting and dealing with the oral problems

Difficult

380

184

0.002

216

371

0.000

Not difficult

443

308

 

201

559

 

6. Discussing with physicians and obtaining the necessary orders regarding diabetes

Difficult

179

81

0.025

118

154

0.000

Not difficult

648

408

 

300

776

 

7. Sharing the information regarding diabetes with care workers

Difficult

271

124

0.004

156

256

0.000

Not difficult

555

367

 

262

675

 

8. Developing the shared understanding of the care plan with care workers

Difficult

416

206

0.004

222

422

0.009

Not difficult

409

283

 

196

506

 

9. Keep blood glucose level in healthy range while respecting residents’ needs and preferences

Difficult

508

264

0.005

283

509

0.000

Not difficult

316

227

 

135

420

 

"Difficult" includes "very difficult" and "somewhat difficult"

"Not difficult" includes "not too difficult", "not difficult at all" and “not sure”