Study setting
This study was conducted at the bacteriology laboratory at the Children’s Hospital at West mead, Australia from November 2018 to November 2019. All positive blood culture broths were processed routinely alongside the direct identification protocol for performance comparison.
Routine method
Blood was taken with aseptic technique, directly inoculated into aerobic (BacT/Alert FA plus), and /or anaerobic bottles (BacT/Alert FN plus). Bottles were loaded onto the BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO® instrument (bioMérieux) for incubation up to 5 days, or until they signaled as positive. All positive blood cultures were analyzed by Gram stain and subjected to subculture on solid media ( blood, MacConkey, chocolate and anaerobic blood agar) then incubated at 35 ± 1 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 18–24 hrs. Conventional identification methods included biochemical and automated platforms (Vitek II, bio-Mérieux and Vitek MS, bioMérieux), depending on the organism isolated. Discordant identifications were further characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing at a reference laboratory when identification was deemed to be clinically relevant.
In-house rapid identification protocol
For each positive culture, 1.5 ml of positive blood culture broth was centrifuged at 500 rpm (23 g) for 2 minutes to separate erythrocytes from the bacterial cells. 50µl of Triton (10×) was added to the supernatant followed by gentle mixing and centrifugation for 1 min at 13,000 rpm (15900g). The pellets were re-suspended in 1.5 ml distilled water and centrifuged for 1 min at 13000 rpm (15900g). 50 µl of formic acid (70%) and 50 µl of acetonitrile were added to the pellet and mixed, then centrifuged for 1 min at 13,000 rpm (15900g). Following this, 1 µl of supernatant was spotted in triplicate onto a target slide and air-dried. Each spot was covered with 1 µl of an alpha-cyano–4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix for MALDI-TOF MS analysis.
MALDI-TOF MS analysis
The target plate was analyzed by the Vitek® MS V3.2 bioMérieux system and matched against a library of data representing 1,316 taxa. This analysis returned a result with the best identification match along with a confidence percentage from 0% to 99.9%. A 95 to 99.9% confidence reading on a minimum of one spot was considered high at the species level while 90–94% confidence was considered high at the genus level. If the confidence score was ≥50–94%, the result was recorded as ‘genus-level’ if there was a choice of 2—4 organisms all within the same genus. However, if the organisms were distributed between different genera, no valid identification was recorded.
Clinical data collection
A prospective clinical impact analysis was conducted over seven weeks between August and September 2019. For all positive blood cultures identified over this period, a clinical impact assessment was performed against three categories: 1) change in antimicrobials, 2) change in intervention or 3) infection control impacts. Clinical data pertaining to these outcomes, as well as clinical diagnosis and likely significance of a positive culture, were recorded on day one (day of Gram stain result) and day two (day of formal organism identification) after collection of the index culture. Cases where rapid MALDI-TOF gave organism identification were considered as having the potential to change clinical management on day one.
Statistical analysis
The identification results of the in-house method were compared with that of the routine identification method. The correct identification rate was recorded as the number of isolates that were correctly identified by routine methods divided by the overall number of isolates in sub-groups. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values to genus level were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy.