See the published version of this preprint at Archives of Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Yousef S. Khader
Jordan University of Science & Technology
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-6857
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background
Jordan Stillbirths and Neonatal Deaths Surveillance system (JSANDS) is a newly developed system and is currently implemented in five large hospitals in Jordan. This study aimed at exploring the healthcare professional’s perception about the usability of JSANDS.
Methods
A descriptive qualitative approach, using focus group discussions, was adopted. A total of 5 focus groups including 23 focal points were conducted in five participating hospitals in Jordan.
Results
Data analysis identified nine main issues related to the JSANDS system: the system usefulness, the system performance, data quality, the system limitations, human rights, female empowerment, nurses’ strengthened competencies, the sustainability of the JSANDS, and COVID-19 impact on the system. Users reported that the JSANDS data were useful, the system was simple and easy to use, and the data were accurate and complete. However, some users reported that some technical issues need to be enhanced.
Conclusions
JSANDS was perceived positively by the current users. According to them, it provides a formative and comprehensive data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths and their causes, and therefore, was recommended to be adopted by its users and scaled up.
Keywords
Stillbirths, neonatal deaths, surveillance
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Archives of Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 24 Feb, 2021
Editor assigned
On 03 Feb, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 03 Feb, 2021
Editor invited
On 03 Feb, 2021
No comments provided
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 17 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 17 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 16 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 16 Jan, 2021
Editor invited
On 16 Jan, 2021
Version 1
Posted 29 Sep, 2020
No comments provided
Review #1 received
Received 23 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 22 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 02 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 28 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 24 Sep, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 23 Sep, 2020
Editor invited
On 23 Sep, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Sep, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at Archives of Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Yousef S. Khader
Jordan University of Science & Technology
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-6857
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Archives of Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 24 Feb, 2021
Editor assigned
On 03 Feb, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 03 Feb, 2021
Editor invited
On 03 Feb, 2021
No comments provided
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 17 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 17 Jan, 2021
Editor assigned
On 16 Jan, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 16 Jan, 2021
Editor invited
On 16 Jan, 2021
Version 1
Posted 29 Sep, 2020
No comments provided
Review #1 received
Received 23 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 22 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 02 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 28 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 24 Sep, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 23 Sep, 2020
Editor invited
On 23 Sep, 2020
First submitted
On 22 Sep, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Archives of Public Health.
Background
Jordan Stillbirths and Neonatal Deaths Surveillance system (JSANDS) is a newly developed system and is currently implemented in five large hospitals in Jordan. This study aimed at exploring the healthcare professional’s perception about the usability of JSANDS.
Methods
A descriptive qualitative approach, using focus group discussions, was adopted. A total of 5 focus groups including 23 focal points were conducted in five participating hospitals in Jordan.
Results
Data analysis identified nine main issues related to the JSANDS system: the system usefulness, the system performance, data quality, the system limitations, human rights, female empowerment, nurses’ strengthened competencies, the sustainability of the JSANDS, and COVID-19 impact on the system. Users reported that the JSANDS data were useful, the system was simple and easy to use, and the data were accurate and complete. However, some users reported that some technical issues need to be enhanced.
Conclusions
JSANDS was perceived positively by the current users. According to them, it provides a formative and comprehensive data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths and their causes, and therefore, was recommended to be adopted by its users and scaled up.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...