Circ_TGFBR2 was relatively down-regulated in AD
By examining the UCSC database, we discovered that the 1302-bp circ_TGFBR2 was generated by circularization of exon 4 of TGFBR2 gene with the position of chr3:30686238–30715738. cDNA and gDNA were extracted from AD-VSMCs cells and then were subjected to nucleic acid electrophoresis detection. The results revealed that circ_TGFBR2 could be detected in cDNA while no amplification product was observed in gDNA (Fig. 1A). Whereafter, the stability of circ_TGFBR2 was determined in AD-VMSCs cells by RNase R. The results showed that RNase R degraded the linear transcript of TGFBR2, while the circular transcript of circ_TGFBR2 was resistant to digestion with RNase R, implying that circ_TGFBR2 was circular (Fig. 1B). Besides, we evaluated the expression level of linear TGFBR2 and circ_TGFBR2 with the treatment of actinomycin D. The results showed that the level of circ_TGFBR2 had no significant change with actinomycin D treatment at different times. While the linear TGFBR2 expression was largely decreased at 8h, 12h, 24h after actinomycin D treatment (Figure S3). In addition, FISH experiment revealed that circ_TGFBR2 was down-regulated in in clinical AD aorta samples compared with normal aorta tissues (Fig. 1C, D). Moreover, Fig. 1E showed that circ_TGFBR2 located mainly in cytoplasm. Additionally, the qRT-PCR data evaluated that circ_TGFBR2 was remarkably down-regulated in clinical AD samples compared to the normal aorta tissues (Fig. 1F).
Inhibition of circ_TGFBR2 promoted the proliferation, migration and phenotype switch in N-VSMCs cells
Firstly, we determined the expression of circ_TGFBR2 between N-VSMCs cells and AD-VSMCs cells. The RT-PCR results showed that circ_TGFBR2 was significantly down-regulated in AD-VSMCs cells, that was consistent with the conclusions tested in clinical samples (Fig. 2A). Specific siRNA targeting circ_TGFBR2 was synthesized and the interference efficiency was determined by RT-PCR (Figure S4). si-circ_TGFBR2-2 was selected for further research. We performed CCK-8 and EDU assay to evaluate the proliferation in N-VSMCs cells. The results indicated that inhibition of circ_TGFBR2 remarkably enhanced cell proliferation (Fig. 2B-D). Moreover, transwell assay and flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that N-VSMCs cells migration ability was accelerated while the apoptosis was significantly reduced after si-circ_TGFBR2 transfection (Fig. 2E-H). Besides, western blot results revealed that inhibition of circ_TGFBR2 remarkably decreased the expression of contractile markers (α-SMA, SM22α) and increased the expression of synthetic markers (MGP, OPN) (Fig. 2I, J), which demonstrated that inhibition of circ_TRGFBR2 promoted the phenotype switch in N-VSMCs cells.
Overexpression of circ_TGFBR2 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and phenotype switch of AD-VSMCs cells
To investigate the biological functions of circ_TGFBR2 in AD-VSMCs cells, we cloned the circ_TGFBR2 sequence into pLO5-ciR vector to generate circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids. Firstly, qRT-PCR assay was carried out to evaluate the expression of circ_TGFBR2 and linear TGFBR2 after transfection with vector or circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids. The results indicated that the expression of circ_TGFBR2 was obviously enhanced in the circ_TGFBR2 OE group compared to the vector group. Whereas, the level of linear TGFBR had no significant change in AD-VSMCs cells (Figure S5). CCK-8 assay and EDU assay were carried out to explore the proliferation of AD-VSMCs cells. A notable inhibition of cell proliferation after circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids transfection was observed (Fig. 3A-C). Additionally, circ_TGFBR2 overexpression remarkably reduced cell migration ability and enhanced cell apoptosis (Fig. 3D-G). Moreover, western blot analysis was carried out to examine phenotype switch-related proteins expression of AD-VSMCs cells after plasmid transfection. The results showed that overexpression of circ_TGFBR2 obviously promoted the expression of contractile markers (α-SMA,SM22α) and inhibited the expression of synthetic markers (MGP,OPN) in AD-VSMCs cells.
Circ_TGFBR2 functioned as a miR-29a sponge
Previous studies have determined that circRNAs sponge miRNAs to participate in the regulation of cell physiology process[19]. Therefore, bioinformatics analysis (circular RNA interactome) was screened to predict the miRNA which could potential target circ_TGFBR2. Cells were transfected with different kind of miRNA mimics. The luciferase activity assay indicated that miR-29a showed highest luciferase suppression efficiency (Fig. 4A). Otherwise, bioinformatics analysis showed the miR-29a binding site with circ_TGFBR2 (Fig. 4B). Then Luciferase reporter assay was carried out. The findings indicated that miR-29a only notably decreased the relative luciferase intensity in of circ_TGFBR2-WT compared with other groups (Fig. 4C). To further confirm the interaction of circ_TGFBR2 and miR-29a, RNA pull down was performed in AD-VSMCs cells. As is showed in Fig. 4D, biotin-labeled miR-29a enriched circ_TGFBR2, thus indicating the binding interaction of circ_TGFBR2 and miR-29a. Additionally, FISH assay revealed that circ-TGFBR2 was co-localized in cytoplasm with miR-29a in AD-VSMCs cells (Fig. 4E). The qRT-PCR results showed that miR-29a was obviously up-regulated in clinical AD samples compared to the normal aorta samples (Fig. 4F). Besides, the Pearson analysis revealed the negative correlation between circ_TGFBR2 and miR-29a (Fig. 4G).
MiR-29a effectively reversed the function of circ_TGFBR2 in AD
We next explored whether circ_TGFBR2 regulated AD progression through miR-29a. As showed in Fig. 5A, compared to the control vector group, circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids group inhibited proliferation of AD-VSMCs cells, yet the miR-29a mimics group increased proliferation. Co-transfection of circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids and miR-29a mimics eliminated the influence on cell proliferation caused by only circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids. Furthermore, function studies revealed that circ_TGFBR2 overexpression could remarkably inhibited the clonability, migration and raised apoptosis of AD-VSMCs cells. On the contrary, miR-29a mimics transfection notably improved the clonability, migration and decreased apoptosis od AD-VSMCs cells. Co-transfection of circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmid and miR-29a mimics reversed the influence of up-regulated circ_TGFBR2 on clonability, migration and apoptosis of AD-VSMCs cells. (Fig. 5B-G).
MiR-29a directly targeted KLF4 in AD
To clarify the precise mechanism underlying the biological regulation induced by circ_TGFBR2, we studied the downstream targets of miR-29a through miRDB, miRWalk, miR-tarbase and TargetScan database. According the analysis, KLF4 was selected as a candidate (Fig. 6A). Figure 6B showed the target region of miR-29a and KLF4. Here, to identify the interaction between miR-29a and KLF4, we conducted luciferase reporter assay after co-transfection with wild-type (WT) or mutated (MUT) KLF4-3’UTR and miR-29a mimics or mimics control. The results showed that miR-29a only markedly inhibited the luciferase intensity of co-transfection with WT KLF4-3’UTR compared with other groups (Fig. 6C). RNA pull-down assay was applied to further determine the interaction between miR-29a and KLF4. As indicated by the findings, KLF4 expression was enriched by biotin-labeled miR-29a in AD-VSMCs cells (Fig. 6D). In addition, qRT-PCR analysis was conducted to examine KLF4 expression after miR-29a or circ_TGFBR2 up/down regulation. The results showed that KLF4 level inhibited after miR-29a mimics or circ_TGFBR2 siRNA transfection. Whereas, KLF4 expression increased obviously after miR-29 inhibitor or circ_TGFBR2 overexpression plasmids transfection (Fig. 6E, F). Pearson analysis revealed the significant negative correlation between miR-29a and KLF4, and a positive correlation between circ_TGFBR2 and KLF4 (Fig. 6G, H).
Circ_TGFBR2 regulated the promotion of AD in vivo
Next, we carried out in vivo study to further investigate the biological functions of circ_TGFBR2 in the progression of AD. We constructed AD animal models and as shown in Fig. 7A, compared with the Sham group, HE staining results revealed that muscle fiber assembly was disordered and the membrane thickness of the AD aorta increased notably. RT-PCR results showed that the expression of circ_TGFBR2 in AD aorta samples was obviously up-regulated compared with the Sham group (Fig. 7B). Then the AD model rats are grouped and treated as indicated in Fig. 7C. The IHC staining was applied to determine the Ki67 expression in aorta tissues and the results revealed that injection of AD rat with lentivirus carrying si-circ_TGFBR2 could notably promoted Ki67 expression while overexpression of circ_TGFBR2 remarkably inhibited the Ki67 expression (Fig. 7D, E). Besides, as Fig. 7F ,7G and 7H showed, the expression level of circ_TGFBR2 and KLF4 in aorta samples were obviously increased, while the expression of miR-29a was inhibited after circ_TGFBR2 overexpression lentivirus administration. However, inhibition of circ_TGFBR2 accelerated the expression of miR-29a while reduced the expression of circ_TGFBR2 and KLF4. Furthermore, western blot assay revealed that the expression level of α-SMA and SM22α was enhanced, while the expression level of OPN and MGP was inhibited in aorta tissues after circ_TGFBR2 overexpression. However, the opposite results of the expression of α-SMA, SM22α, OPN and MGP were obtained after si-circ_TGFBR2 treatment (Fig. 7I, J). Thus, we concluded that circ_TGFBR2 is down-regulated in AD, and its overexpression inhibited the promotion of AD in vitro and in vivo.