Effect of short-term blood pressure variability on functional outcome after intra-arterial treatment in acute stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion

doi:10.21203/rs.2.9582/v2

Download PDF

Research article

Effect of short-term blood pressure variability on functional outcome after intra-arterial treatment in acute stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.9582/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 26 Sep, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Neurology →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is advocated for acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), but perioperative periods are challenging.This study investigated the relationship between post-EVT short-term blood pressure variability (BPV) and early outcomes in LVO patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 72 LVO patients undergoing EVT between June 2015 and June 2018. Hourly systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively) were recorded in the first 24 hours post-EVT. BPV were evaluated as standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and successive variation (SV) separately for SBP and DBP. Three-month functional independence was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Results: For 58.3% patients with favorable outcomes, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT scores on admission were 14 and 8, respectively. The maximum SBP ([154.3±16.8] vs. [163.5±15.6], P=0.02), systolic CV ([8. 8%±2.0%] vs. [11.0%±1.8%], P<0.001), SV ([11.4±2.3] vs. [14.6±2.0], P<0.001), and SD ([10.5±2.4] vs. [13.8±3.9], P<0.001) were lower in patients with favorable outcomes. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, systolic SV (OR: 4.273, 95% CI: 1.030 to 17.727, P=0.045) independently predicted unfavorable prognosis. The area under the curve was 0.868 (95% CI: 0.781 to 0.955, P<0.001), and sensitivity and specificity were 93.3% and 73.8%, respectively, showing excellent value for 3-month poor-outcome predictions. Conclusions: Decreased systolic SV following intra-arterial therapies result in favorable 3-month outcomes. Systolic SV may be a novel predictor of functional prognosis in LVO patients.

Neurology

Blood pressure

Acute ischemic stroke

Large vessel occlusion

Functional outcome

Early endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients who had acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) is highly recommended based on the findings of six randomized controlled clinical trials [1-6]_. However, several factors during the perioperative period of EVT, including blood pressure (BP) management, need urgent attention. The optimal range of BP following EVT remains unclear. The 2018 American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guidelines for the early management of patients with AIS recommends maintaining the BP at <180/105 mm Hg (IIb, B-NR) in patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with successful reperfusion [7].The 2018 Chinese guidelines also recommend a target BP of 140/90 or a BP of 20 mmHg lower than that at baseline, but it should also not be less than 100/60 mmHg (II, C) [8]. However, although the BP is maintained within the target range, reperfusion injury still occurs.

Blood pressure variability (BPV) is the fluctuation of BP in a certain period of time. In the acute stage of cerebrovascular disease, the fluctuation of cerebral perfusion pressure is aggravated by short-term BPV due to impaired automatic regulation of cerebral blood flow [9]. Hypertension during the perioperative period may lead to adverse events such as reperfusion syndrome and cardiovascular complications, while hypotension may lead to hypoperfusion and increases the risk of infarction. A recent systematic review reported that increased BPV after stroke is associated with higher rates of intracranial hemorrhage and disability [10].However, there is limited epidemiological evidence to evaluate the relationship between BP level and early functional prognosis after EVT. Thus, this study aimed to explore the association of short-term BPV in the first 24 hours following EVT with functional outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO.

Patient selection

This is a retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taiyuan Central Hospital, Shanxi, People’s Republic of China. Consecutive AIS-LVO patients who underwent emergency EVT in the tertiary care stroke center of Taiyuan Central Hospital between June 2015 and June 2018 were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age of ≥18 years; (2) AIS confirmed via head computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging at admission; (3) occlusion of the internal carotid artery or M1 of the middle cerebral artery diagnosed within 6 hours after onset by digital subtraction angiography; (4) preoperative Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of ≥6, prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of <2, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥6; (5) treatment initiated (groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset; (6) clinical features and BP recorded at baseline and hourly for at least 24 hours after EVT; and (7) follow up by phone or face-to-face consultations at 3 months with complete documentation. Patients were excluded if they had active bleeding or a bleeding tendency (including primary intracerebral hemorrhage, and potential causes such as gastrointestinal malignancy, liver cirrhosis, renal failure, hematologic tumor, vitamin K deficiency, and sepsis, which could lead to bleeding events), serious heart failure or respiratory failure pre-admission, glucose <50 mg/dL or >400 mg/dL, severe hypertension beyond drug control, and severe non-cardiovascular events that occurred within 3 months of follow-up. The management of patients with AIS-LVO was based on the Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of AIS 2014 and Chinese guidelines for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2015 [11, 12].

Data collection

Baseline characteristics such as demographics, vascular risk factors, previous use of anti-platelet aggregation drugs, Trial of ORG 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST) types on admission, NIHSS scores on admission, ASPECTS on admission, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) on admission, laboratory values, and type of treatment for the EVT were collected. The degree of recanalization at the end of EVT was measured using the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score [13] as obtained from the reports of interventional specialists (C.W. and F.Z.). All patients were examined via brain CT in the first 24 hours after EVT to determine any changes in intracranial hemorrhage using the criteria developed by the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) [14]: HI1, small petechiae with an indistinct border within the vascular territory; HI2, more confluent petechiae, no mass effect; PHI, hematoma within infarcted tissue, occupying <30% of the infarcted area, no substantive mass effect; and PH2, >30% of the infarcted area with significant space-occupying effect or parenchymal hematoma distant from the infarcted brain tissue.

BP monitoring and BPV presentation post EVT

The hourly SBP and DBP of all patients were recorded during the first 24 hours following EVT. Postoperative management of blood pressure depended on whether the responsible vessels were successful recanalized according to the Chinese guidelines for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2015 [12], which recommend a target BP of 20-30 mmHg lower than that at baseline, but it should not be less than 90/60 mmHg in patients with successful recanalization. For patients without successful recanalization, permissive hypertension was set at a systolic blood pressure more than 150 but not exceeding 180 mmHg. For patients pretreated with intravenous thrombolysis, permissive hypertension was set at <180/105 mmHg. All patients with postoperative hypertension were treated with intravenous urapidil (first choice) or sodium nitroprusside (second choice) when BP levels exceeded the former prespecified cut-offs. We documented the maximum, minimum, and mean arterial BP (MAP, SBP + 2 × DBP)/3) levels for each individual. Based on previously published studies, BPV was calculated using the following equation:

(1) Standard deviation of mean BP (SD): [Due to technical limitations, Equation 1 is only available as a download in the supplemental files section],

(2) Coefficient of variability (CV [%]): SD/BP_mean× 100,

(3)Successive variation (SV): [Due to technical limitations, Equation 3 is only available as a download in the supplemental files section] [15].

Evaluation of functional prognosis

Functional outcome was evaluated at 3 months by certified neurologists using the mRS score. The patients were then divided into two groups based on the functional outcome score: the favorable and unfavorable outcome groups comprised patients with mRS 0-2 and mRS 3-5, respectively. The mRS scores were determined based on the follow-up findings.

Statistical analysis

All data analyses were performed using SPSS V. 25.0 software. Continuous variables were expressed as means±SD (normal distribution) or median with interquartile range (IQR) (skewed distribution). Comparisons between groups were conducted using the Students t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or χ² test, or One-way ANOVA analysis as appropriate. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the association between BPV indexes during the first 24 hours post EVT with 3-month functional outcome before and after adjustment for the following potential confounders: age, sex, hypertension, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, smoking, admission NIHSS scores, admission serum glucose and LDL-C levels, admission SBP and DBP levels, type of anesthesia (general anesthesia vs conscious sedation), baseline ASPECTS, onset to groin puncture time, vascular lesion (M1 of the MCA vs ICA), frequency of MT, and type of EVT. In the initial univariable analyses, a P value < 0.05 was set as the threshold for inclusion in the multivariable models. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine any associations.

To determine the predictive capabilities according to SBP SV, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of systolic SV were calculated. Because the interaction between SBPV and successful reperfusion or offending artery was significant, a subgroup analysis by BPV parameters with 3-month functional outcome were used. We also examined the impact of BPV on functional outcome by different systolic SV. Patients were stratified according to the quartile of their systolic SV during the first 24 hours post EVT and the distribution of the patients with favorable outcomes was calculated in each group.

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Among 83 patients who underwent emergency EVT in our stroke unit, 11 (13.3%) patients were excluded due to the following causes: 2 (2.4%) died as a result of non-cardiovascular disease, 4 (4.8%) had inadequate BP during the first 24 hours, 3 (3.6%) exited the study during the 3-month follow-up, and 2 (2.4%) died as a result of cerebral hernia. As a result, 72 patients with AIS-LVO within the anterior circulation were enrolled in this study.

The baseline clinical demographic characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. Of the 72 patients, including 42 (58.3%) with favorable outcomes and 30 (41.7%) with unfavorable outcomes at 3-months, the mean age was 64.8±10.9 years, and 27 (37.5%) were women. The median NIHSS score at admission was 14 points [IQR, 9-19], while the median ASPECTS was 8 points [IQR, 7-9]. Of the 72 patients, 86.1% patients achieved recanalization (TICI 2b or 3). In total, 26.4% patients received combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy, 13.9% of patients were treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis alone, and 59.7% of patients were treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy. Intracranial hemorrhagic transformation occurred in 13 patients (18.0%), while the hemorrhagic transformation was no different between the patients with the three treatments of EVT (Supplemental Table 1). .

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in the two outcome groups

Compared to patients with an unfavorable outcome group, the NIHSS scores, admission SBP level, and frequency of MT were significantly lower in the favorable outcome group (all P<0.05). Patients with a 3-month favorable outcome were more likely to have M1 of middle cerebral artery offending, to have higher rates of successful recanalization, to have higher admission ASCEPT scores, and to receive intra-arterial thrombolysis alone. The rates of vascular risk factors, time of symptom onset to groin puncture, and HI were not significantly different between the two groups.

Table 2 lists the baseline characteristics of patients in different groups, in which patients are divided quartile by systolic SV values. Compared to the high level (Q4) of systolic SV group, patients in the other three groups (Q1, Q2 and Q3) were had a higher frequency of MT, lower ASPECT score at admission and had a lower rates of successful recanalization post EVT.

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients

BPV and 3-month functional outcome

In this study (Fig. 1), we detected the difference in maximum SBP, systolic CV, SV, and SD between the two outcome groups. Patients with unfavorable prognosis had higher maximum SBP ([163.5±15.6] vs. [154.3±16.8], P=0.02), systolic CV ([11.0%±1.8%] vs. [8.8%±2.0%], P<0.001), SV ([14.6±2.0] vs. [11. 4±2.3], P<0.001), and SD ([13.8±3.9] vs. [10. 5±2.4], P<0.001). We found no significant difference in the level of MAP, mean SBP, minimum SBP, and dates of DBP variability between the two groups (P>0.05). In a subgroup analysis, we also found the maximum SBP, systolic SV, CV, SD were lower in patients with a favorable outcome in the successful recanalization group, but there was no significant different in the non-successful recanalization group. Lower systolic SV, CV, and SD were found in M1 of the MCA lesion group, according to vascular lesions. In the ICA lesion group, the systolic SV was lower amongst those patients with a favorable outcome; other BPV parameters were not found to be different (Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison of SBP and DBP variability parameters between different subgroups

Influencing factors of 3-month functional independence

Table 4. summarizes the univariable and multivariable associations of BP measurements after EVT and other clinical characteristics with the 3-month functional prognosis. The following variables were significantly related (P<0.05) to 3-month functional independence in the initial univariable analyses: NIHSS score at admission; SBP at admission; ASPECTS at admission; M1of the MCA occlusion; frequency of mechanical thrombectomy; measurement of EVT; successful recanalization; maximum SBP and systolic SD, CV, and SV post MT. After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression revealed that systolic SV (OR: 4.273, 95% CI: 1.030 to 17.727, P=0.045) was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome, and a high ASPECTS was independently associated with a better likelihood of a favorable outcome (OR: 0.200, 95% CI: 0.054 to 0.744, P=0.016).

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the favorable outcomes after EVT

mRS score distribution according to quartiles of systolic SV

Patients were divided into quartiles by systolic SV values. mRS scores were statistically different in each group and the patients with lower systolic SV had lower mRS scores at 3-month. However, no difference in mRS scores was noted in patients with systolic SV 0-25% and 25-50%（P＞0.05; Fig.2).

ROC analysis

ROC analysis demonstrated that the areas under the curve (AUC) of systolic SV for predicting unfavorable outcome was 0.868 (95% CI: 0.781 to 0.955, P<0.001; Fig. 3). The optimal cut-off value was 12.499, which resulted in 93.3% sensitivity, 73.8% specificity, 71.1% PPV, and 91.2% NPV (Table 5). This indicates that an systolic SV of 12.499 had an excellent predictive value for a poor 3-month functional outcome.

Table 5 Cut-off values of systolic SV

The clinical outcome in patients with ischemic stroke is affected by many factors, including age, severity of stroke, collateral compensation, time of successful reperfusion, and device selected for EVT. BP management and its effect on functional outcome is particularly controversial. A previous study showed that increased systolic BPV positively contributed to symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and death after intravenous thrombolysis [16].However, less is known about the effect of short-term BPV after EVT on the early outcomes of AIS-LVO patients. Our study shows that lower maximum SBP and systolic CV, SV, and SD levels during the first 24 hours after EVT are related to a better 3-month functional outcome, which was consistent with the results reported by Bennett [17].

BPV is divided into physiological and pathological variability, which fluctuates with physiological regulation, environmental changes, pathological influence. The possible pathophysiological mechanisms regarding short-term BPV in AIS patients with EVT are not clear. In a previous study, increased BPV may promote shear force of blood vessels and produce vascular inflammation by increasing endothelial expression of cytokines, which affect the structure of the vascular wall and lead to the formation of atherosclerotic plaques [18-19]. Another hypothesis is that the effects of increased BPV on brain tissue may vary with the degree of impaired cerebral autoregulation [20], and the cerebral blood flow dependent on cerebral perfusion pressure and blood viscosity [21]. Endovascular therapy can not only stimulate endothelial cells, but also change the cerebral perfusion pressure and vascular resistance in LVO-AIS patients. Therefore, there is a potential correlation between blood pressure variability and outcome of LVO-AIS patients after intra-arterial treatment.

BPV are commonly quantified by calculating SD, CV, and SV [19]. Several studies have shown that higher systolic CV or SD is associated with poor prognosis after stroke [22-23]; however, systolic SV, an indicator of systolic blood pressure variability, is more commonly used in many studies, because it can better reflect the time-series variability of BP, while other parameters, such as SD and CV, ignore the temporal change of data, resulting in the same SD or CV in individuals with different clinical characteristics [24]. In our study, we confirmed that the systolic SV, rather than systolic CV and SD, was closely associated with 3-month functional outcome. Lower systolic SV levels may be beneficial to achieving 3-month functional independence. These findings suggest that keeping a stable BP may be more useful than just controlling the BP level after EVT.

A study of 217 patients who underwent MT showed that a higher maximum SBP was closely related to 3-month mortality and poor outcome. Each 10 mmHg increase in maximum SBP during the first 24 hours post MT was associated with a lower 3-month functional prognosis and a higher odds of 3-month mortality [25]. Although our study did not found the maximum SBP was an influential factor for functional outcome, this may related to our study subjects’ characteristics. Our research found that the rate of successful recanalization was higher in the favorable outcome group, which also had lower maximum SBP, indirectly suggesting that patients with successful reperfusion are more likely to benefit from lower SBP [26].

Some studies showed that BP within the first 48 hours after a stroke showed a U-shaped correlation with clinical outcome [17, 27],particularly in patients with non-recanalization. The authors argued that patients with unsuccessful recanalization had larger infarct size and ischemic penumbra, and impaired cerebral autoregulation led to further enlargement of the ischemic penumbra [17]. The effect of BPV on the ischemic penumbra is different from that on the infarct core [19]. In the hours after onset, potentially ischemic penumbra are particularly sensitive to blood pressure fluctuations, with sudden drops in blood pressure increasing the risk of tissue ischemia and reducing the chance of reperfusion, and sudden increases in blood pressure increasing the risk of bleeding. Patients who received EVT and had unsuccessful reperfusion enlarged the ischemic penumbra, which was sensitive to blood pressure variability, greatly increasing the risk of neurological deterioration caused by BPV. In addition, cerebral ischemia and MT itself can lead to the destruction of blood-brain barrier, resulting in vasogenic edema and hemorrhagic transformation after infarction. Moreover, iatrogenic injury to endothelial cells during MT can cause a series of reperfusion-related injuries [28]that not only increase intracranial hemorrhage associated with SBP, but also lead to adverse functional prognosis. In this study, due to the small number of cases of patients without recanalization, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of functional outcome. Future studies should focus on enlarging the sample size to be more adequately powered for these sorts of subanalyses. Another study also showed that the peak level of SBP was closely related to poor outcome regardless of whether LVO recanalization was achieved or not. The authors suggested that this is probably because abnormally elevated BP may be associated with potential collateral circulation damage [29].

The impairment of cerebral autoregulation is influenced by infarct size [30]. Thus, BPV may exert a greater pathophysiological role in patients with severe stroke than in patients with mild stroke. In our study, patients with favorable prognosis were more likely to have M1 of the middle cerebral artery affected, which may, in theory, produce a smaller infarct volume. Our subgroup analysis also confirmed that in patients with M1 of MCA lesions, the systolic SV, CV, and SD were lower in the favorable outcome group.

Several limitations of the present study need to be acknowledged. First, this was a single-center retrospective study with a relatively small sample size. Thus, selection bias in baseline data could not be avoided. Second, a recent study demonstrated that BPV post MT may increase the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) [10],but we did not evaluate the relationship between BPV and sICH because the patients who developed intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up were classified according to ECASS criteria without the clinical classification for sICH. Third, variable reasons such as the varying time from stroke onset to arrival at our hospital for first BP measurement and differences in time intervals between BP measurements may cause bias in our results. However, we exerted every effort to provide reliable dates to mitigate the inherent limitations. Fourth, SD, CV and SV are not suitable for the long-term evaluation of BPV after EVT; severe stroke with a poor prognosis may give rise to greater variability in BP. Therefore, additional well-designed and larger prospective randomized cohort studies are required to confirm the association of BPV and functional prognosis and to determine strategies to reduce the BPV.

Decreased systolic SV following intra-arterial therapies result in favorable 3-month outcomes. This shows that systolic SV may be a novel predictor of functional prognosis in LVO patients.

EVT: Endovascular treatment; LVO: Large-vessel occlusion; BP: Blood pressure; BPV: Blood pressure variability; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; SD: Standard deviation; CV: Coefficient of variation; SV: Successive variation; mRS: Modified Rankin Scale; AIS: Acute ischemic stroke; MT: Mechanical thrombectomy; ASPECTS: Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; TOAST: Trial of ORG 10172 in acute stroke treatment; TICI: Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction; ECASS: European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study; MCA: middle cerebral artery; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IQR: Interquartile range; OR: Odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; AUC: Area under the curve; HI: Petechial infarction without space-occupying effect; PH: Hemorrhage (coagulum) with mass effect; ICH: intracerebral hemorrhagic.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by ShanXi Science and Technology Department (CN) : Establishment of Information Service for Stroke Treatment in Taiyuan Central Hospital (Grant No. 2015091012).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

WRL conceived the study and revised the manuscript. TLZ wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. XLW, CW, FZ, and SWG performed intra-arterial treatment and collected the data and interpreted the analysis. SQL, XDZ and JS critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethic committee of the Taiyuan Central Hospital, ShanXi, China. Patient’s consents were waived by the ethic committee of the ethic committee of the Taiyuan Central Hospital, due to the retrospective design of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

1. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285-95.

2. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019-30.

3. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009-18.

4. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11-20.

5. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296-306.

6. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1138-47.

7.Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46-e110.

8.Chinese Sociaty of Neurology, Chinese Stroke Society, Neurovascular Intervention Group of Chinese Society of Neurology. Chinese guidelines for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018. Chin J Neurol. 2018;51:683-691.

9. Dawson SL, Panerai RB, Potter JF. Serial changes in static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation after acute ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16:69-75.

10. Manning LS, Rothwell PM, Potter JF, et al. Prognostic Significance of Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Stroke: Systematic Review. Stroke. 2015;46:2482-90.

11.Chinese Sociaty of Neurology, Chinese Stroke Society, Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2014.Chin J Neurol. 2015;48:246-257.

12.Chinese Sociaty of Neurology, Chinese Stroke Society, Neurovascular Intervention Group of Chinese Society of Neurology. Chinese guidelines for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2015. Chin J Neurol. 2015;48:356-361.

13. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, et al. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:e109-37.

14. Yaghi S, Willey JZ, Cucchiara B, et al. Treatment and Outcome of Hemorrhagic Transformation After Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e343-e361.

15. Endo K, Kario K, Koga M, et al. Impact of early blood pressure variability on stroke outcomes after thrombolysis: the SAMURAI rt-PA Registry. Stroke. 2013;44:816-8.

16.De Havenon A, Bennett A, Stoddard GJ, et al. Determinants of the impact of blood pressure variability on neurological outcome after acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:1-6.

17. Bennett AE, Wilder MJ, McNally JS, et al. Increased blood pressure variability after endovascular thrombectomy for acute stroke is associated with worse clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:823-827.

18.Kolyviras A, Manios E, Georgiopoulos G, et al. Differential associations of systolic and diastolic time rate of blood pressure variation with carotid atherosclerosis and plaque echogenicity. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017; 19(11): 1070-1077.

19.Manning LS, Rothwell PM, Potter JF, Robinson TG. Prognostic Significance of Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Stroke: Systematic Review. Stroke. 2015; 46(9): 2482-90.

20.Ko Y, Park JH, Yang MH, et al. The significance of blood pressure variability for the development of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010; 41(11): 2512-8.

21.Dankbaar JW, Slooter AJ, Rinkel GJ, Schaaf IC. Effect of different components of triple-H therapy on cerebral perfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2010; 14(1): R23.

22.Sare GM, Ali M, Shuaib A, Bath PM. Relationship between hyperacute blood pressure and outcome after ischemic stroke: data from the VISTA collaboration. Stroke. 2009; 40(6): 2098-103.

23.Geeganage C, Tracy M, England T, et al. Relationship between baseline blood pressure parameters (including mean pressure, pulse pressure, and variability) and early outcome after stroke: data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TAIST). Stroke. 2011; 42(2): 491-3.

24.Xu B, Ji Q, Zhang Y, Shen L, Cao M, Cai K. Postoperative blood pressure variability exerts an influence on clinical outcome after coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurol Res. 2017; 39(9): 813-818.

25.Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Pandhi A, et al. Blood pressure levels post mechanical thrombectomy and outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. Neurology. 2017;89:540-547.

26.Maier IL, Tsogkas I, Behme D, et al. High Systolic Blood Pressure after Successful Endovascular Treatment Affects Early Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45:18-25.

27.Leonardi-Bee J, Bath PM, Phillips SJ, et al. Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 2002;33:1315-20.

28.Teng D, Pannell JS, Rennert RC, et al. Endothelial trauma from mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: in vitro live-cell platform with animal validation. Stroke. 2015;46:1099-106.

29.Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Pandhi A, et al. Blood pressure levels post mechanical thrombectomy and outcomes in non-recanalized large vessel occlusion patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:925-931.

30.Reinhard M, Rutsch S, Lambeck J, et al. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation associates with infarct size and outcome after ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012. 125(3): 156-62.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in the two outcome groups

Variable	Total	Favorable outcome group (n=42, 58.3%)	Unfavorable outcome group (n=30, 41.7%)	P value
Age (years), mean±SD	64.8±10.9	64.5±11.8	65.1±9.8	0.820
Male, n (%)	45 (62.5)	27 (64.3)	18 (60.0)	0.711
Hypertension, n (%)	48 (66.7)	28 (66.7)	20 (66.7)	1.000
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)	23 (31.9)	17 (40.5)	6 (20.0)	0.066
Coronary heart disease, n (%)	21 (29.2)	12 (28.6)	9 (30.0)	0.895
Atrial fibrillation, n (%)	24 (33.3)	16 (31.8)	8 (26.7)	0.310
Previous history of cerebrovascular disease, n (%)	10 (13.9)	5 (11.9)	5 (16.7)	0.565
Previous antiplatelet therapy, n (%)	14 (19.4)	9 (21.4)	5 (16.7)	0.615
Current smoker, n (%)	34 (47.2)	21 (50.0)	13 (43.3)	0.576
NIHSS score at admission, median (IQR)	14 (9-19)	13 (8-17)	17 (12-20)	0.015*
Glucose level at admission (mg/dL), mean±SD	152.3±85.0	163.8±108.0	135.0±30.6	0.157
SBP level at admission (mmHg), mean±SD	153.8±23.5	146.9±18.5	163.5±25.5	0.003*
DBP level at admission (mmHg), mean±SD	85.2±13.4	83.4±12.8	87.6±14.0	0.189
LDL-C at admission (mg/dL), median (IQR)	44.73 (34.97-55.71)	45.18(34.43-53.15)	44.01 (35.19-57.60)	0.541
TOAST type, n (%)
Large artery atherosclerosis	44 (61.1)	23 (54.8)	21(70.0)	0.442
Cardioembolism	23 (31.9)	16 (38.1)	7 (23.3)
Clear reason	4 (5.6)	2 (4.8)	2 (6.7)
Unknown reason	1 (1.4)	1 (2.4)	0 (0.0)
ASPECT at admission, median (IQR)	8 (7-9)	8 (8~9)	7 (6.75-8)	<0.001*
Vascular lesion
M1 of the middle cerebral artery	51 (70.8)	35 (83.3)	16 (53.3)	0.006*
Internal carotid artery	21 (29.2)	7 (16.7)	14 (46.7)
Type of anesthesia
General anesthesia, n (%)	9 (12.5)	4 (9.5)	5 (16.7)	0.366
Conscious sedation, n (%)	63 (87.5)	38 (90.5)	25 (83.3)	0.366
Time from stroke onset to groin puncture (min), mean±SD	290.5±80.5	297.0±72.5	281.4±91.1	0.421
Type of endovascular treatment
Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy, n (%)	19 (26.4%)	8 (19.0)	11 (36.7)	0.094
Intra-arterial thrombolysis, n (%)	10 (13.9)	9 (21.4)	1 (3.3)	0.029*

Direct mechanical thrombectomy, n (%)	43 (59.7)	25 (59.5)	18 (60.0)	0.968
Frequency of mechanical thrombectomy, median (IQR)	2 (2-3)	2 (1-3)	3 (2-3)	0.024*
Rates of successful recanalization, n (%)	62 (86.1)	40 (95.2)	22 (73.3)	0.008*
Intracranial hemorrhagic transformation, n (%)
HI1	5 (6.9)	4 (9.5)	1 (3.3)	0.197
HI2	5 (6.9)	2 (4.8)	3 (10.0)
PH1	2 (2.8)	0 (0.0)	2 (6.7)
PH2	1 (1.4)	0 (0.0)	1 (3.3)

*Statistically significant.

NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ASPECT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, HI petechial infarction without space-occupying effect, PH hemorrhage (coagulum) with mass effect

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients

Variable	Quartile 1 18	Quartile 2 18	Quartile 3 18	Quartile 4 18	P-value
Age (years), mean±SD	64.8±10.2	60.1±12.5	64.6±10.3	69.4±9.4	0.090
Male, n (%)	11 (61.1)	12 (66.7)	9 (50.0)	13 (72.2)	0.557
Hypertension, n (%)	10 (55.6)	12 (66.7)	12 (66.7)	14 (77.8)	0.572
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)	5 (27.8)	9 (50.0)	4 (22.2)	5 (27.8)	0.287
Coronary heart disease, n (%)	3 (16.7)	7 (38.9)	7 (38.9)	4 (22.2)	0.330
Atrial fibrillation, n (%)	7 (38.9)	6 (33.3)	5 (27.8)	6 (33.3)	0.919
Previous history of cerebrovascular disease, n (%)	3 (16.7)	3 (16.7)	0 (0.0)	4 (22.2)	0.243
Current smoker, n (%)	8 (44.4)	12 (66.7)	5 (27.8)	9 (50.0)	0.134
NIHSS score at admission, median (IQR)	9.5 (7.8-14.8)	13 (9.0-16.3)	18 (8.5-21.3)	16.5(13.8-20.0)	0.070
Glucose level at admission (mg/dL), mean±SD	149.0±78.1	184.3±141.3	138.4±37.2	137.4±33.7	0.309
SBP level at admission (mmHg), mean±SD	143.4±23.9	156.7±17.3	158.7±27.0	156.4±23.4	0.189
DBP level at admission (mmHg), mean±SD	81.9±15.1	87.3±11.1	82.7±12.9	88.8±14.0	0.335
LDL-C at admission (mg/dL), median (IQR)	43.5 (33.9-56.4)	49.0 (36.2-56.0)	36.8 (30.3-3.56.7)	46.2 (41.5-56.4)	0.384
TOAST type, n (%)
Large artery atherosclerosis	9 (50.0)	11 (61.1)	12 (66.7)	12 (66.7)	0.442
Cardioembolism	6 (33.3)	6 (33.3)	5 (27.8)	6 (33.3)	0.377
Clear reason	3 (16.7)	0 (0.0)	1 (5.6)	0 (0.0)
Unknown reason	0 (0.0)	1 (5.6)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)
ASPECT at admission, median (IQR)	7.8 (8-9)	8 (8~9)	7 (7-8.3)	7 (6-7.3)	<0.001*
Vascular lesion
M1 of the middle cerebral artery	14 (77.8)	16 (88.9)	10 (55.6)	11 (61.1)	0.106
Internal carotid artery	4 (22.2)	2 (11.1)	8(44.4)	7 (38.9)
Type of anesthesia
Conscious sedation, n (%)	17 (94.4)	14 (77.8)	16 (88.9)	16 (88.9)	0.491
General anesthesia, n (%)	1 (5.6)	4 (22.2)	2 (11.1)	2 (11.1)
Time from stroke onset to groin puncture (min), mean±SD	284.6±60.7	300.1±75.8	308.7±84.6	268.7±97.4	0.467
Type of endovascular treatment
Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy, n (%)	4 (22.2)	7 (38.9)	4 (22.2)	4 (22.2)	0.777
Intra-arterial thrombolysis alone, n (%)	4 (22.2)	2 (11.1)	2 (11.1)	2 (11.1)
Direct mechanical thrombectomy, n (%)	10 (55.6)	9 (50.0)	12 (66.7)	12 (66.7)
Frequency of mechanical thrombectomy, median (IQR)	1.5 (0-3)	1.5 (1-2.3)	2 (1.8-3)	2.5 (2-3.3)	0.038*
Rates of successful recanalization, n (%)	18 (100.0)	17 (94.4)	14 (77.8)	13 (72.2)	0.048*
Intracranial hemorrhagic transformation, n (%)
HI1	1 (5.6)	1 (5.6)	1 (5.6)	2 (11.1)	0.731
HI2	2 (11.1)	0 (0.0)	1 (5.6)	2 (11.1)
PH1	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	1 (5.6)	1 (5.6)
PH2	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)	1 (5.6)

*Statistically significant.

Table 3. Comparison of SBP and DBP variability parameters between different subgroups

Successful recanalization (n=62, 86.1%)				Non-successful recanalization (n=10, 13.9%)
BPV index	Favorable outcome	Unfavorable outcome	P value	BPV index	Favorable outcome	Unfavorable outcome	P value
Maximum SBP	153.4±15.9	165.4±16.0	0.006	Maximum SBP	172.0±32.5	158.1±13.9	0.341
Maximum DBP	94.8±9.6	90.4±6.8	0.063	Maximum DBP	106.5±7.8	94.9±9.6	0.154
Minimum SBP	111.2±14.8	110.0±13.7	0.751	Minimum SBP	131.0±38.2	103.9±12.8	0.496
Minimum DBP	60.0±10.3	58.3±9.3	0.498	Minimum DBP	64.5±30.4	59.4±8.5	0.851
Mean SBP	130.9±15.0	134.2±13.7	0.395	Mean SBP	151.7±33.3	131.1±18.0	0.239
Mean DBP	76.1±8.9	73.7±8.0	0.296	Mean DBP	77.4±25.5	77.1±7.5	0.987
Systolic SV	11.4±2.3	14.4±2.0	<0.001	Systolic SV	12.8±1.8	15.0±1.9	0.174
Systolic SD	10.0±2.4	14.0±4.3	<0.001	Systolic SD	8.7±1.6	13.2±2.6	0.052
Systolic CV	(8.8±2.0)%	(10.8±1.7)%	<0.001	Systolic CV	(8.8±3.1)%	(11.7±2.2)%	0.160
Diastolic SV	9.8±3.2	8.8±2.3	0.182	Diastolic SV	12.1±5.0	10.4±3.2	0.544
Diastolic SD	8.3±2.2	8.0±2.0	0.610	Diastolic SD	8.7±3.7	8.2±1.7	0.796
Diastolic CV	(13.1±4.8)%	(12.1±3.6)%	0.377	Diastolic CV	(17.7±12.3)%	(13.8±5.0)%	0.459
M1 of MCA				ICA
BPV index	Favorable outcome	Unfavorable outcome	P value	BPV index	Favorable outcome	Unfavorable outcome	P value
Maximum SBP	154.2±16.6	159.5±14.9	0.278	Maximum SBP	154.7±19.5	168.0±15.5	0.106
Maximum DBP	96.6±8.8	90.8±8.6	0.032	Maximum DBP	89.1±13.0	92.5±6.6	0.437
Minimum SBP	112.9±16.1	109.1±15.0	0.420	Minimum SBP	108.0±17.3	107.5±12.0	0.939
Minimum DBP	60.0±11.3	57.6±8.1	0.450	Minimum DBP	61.6±11.0	59.6±10.0	0.691
Mean SBP	132.1±16.0	133.1±16.6	0.847	Mean SBP	130.9±18.5	133.8±12.9	0.678
Mean DBP	76.1±9.4	74.4±7.4	0.512	Mean DBP	76.4±11.0	74.9±8.8	0.734
Systolic SV	11.5±1.9	14.5±1.9	<0.001	Systolic SV	11.4±3.9	14.6±2.1	0.02
Systolic SD	10.1±2.0	12.6±2.6	<0.001	Systolic SD	12.8±3.3	15.1±4.7	0.259
Systolic CV	(8.8±1.9)%	(11.0±2.1)%	<0.001	Systolic CV	(8.7±2.5)%	(11.0±1.6)%	0.018
Diastolic SV	10.4±3.3	9.8±2.9	0.533	Diastolic SV	7.7±2.1	8.5±2.3	0.406
Diastolic SD	8.5±2.3	8.3±1.9	0.709	Diastolic SD	7.4±1.3	7.9±2.0	0.552
Diastolic CV	(14.0±5.3)%	(13.3±4.2)%	0.644	Diastolic CV	(10.0±2.0)%	(11.6±3.8)%	0.288

SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, BPV Blood pressure variability, SD Standard deviation, CV Coefficient of variation, SV Successive variation

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the favorable outcomes after EVT

Variable	Univariable logistic regression analysis		Multivariable logistic regression analysis*
	OR (95% CI)	P value*	OR (95% CI)	P value
Age	1.005 (0.963-1.050)	0.817
Male	1.200 (0.457-3.151)	0.711
Hypertension	1.000 (0.370-2.702)	1.000
Coronary heart disease	1.071 (0.383-2.997)	0.895
Atrial fibrillation	0.591 (0.213-1.641)	0.313
Diabetes mellitus	0.368 (0.124-1.089)	0.071
Smoking	0.765 (0.298-1.962)	0.577
Glucose level at admission	0.893 (0.755-1.057)	0.189
NIHSS at admission	1.072 (1.002-1.148)	0.045	0.931 (0.808-1.073)	0.325
SBP level at admission	1.036 (1.010-1.063)	0.006	1.045 (0.993-1.100)	0.092
DBP level at admission	1.025 (0.988-1.063)	0.189
LDL-C at admission	1.170 (0.724-1.891)	0.521
Conscious sedation	1.900 (0.465-7.769)	0.372
ASPECT at admission	0.268 (0.138-0.522)	<0.001	0.200 (0.054-0.744)	0.016
Time from stroke onset to groin puncture	0.998 (0.992-1.003)	0.415
M1of the MCA occlusion	0.229 (0.077-0.675)	0.008	0.076 (0.005-1.078)	0.057
Frequency of mechanical thrombectomy	0.098 (0.011-0.860)	0.036	1.499 (0.038-59.877)	0.830
Combined intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy	2.461 (0.844-7.172)	0.099
Intra-arterial thrombolysis	0.097 (0.012-0.801)	0.030	0.012 (0.000-1.457)	0.071
Successful recanalization	0.138 (0.027-0.075)	0.017	0.030 (0.001-1.842)	0.095
Maximum SBP post EVT**	1.036 (1.004-1.069)	0.803	0.894 (0.777-1.028)	0.116
Maximum DBP post EVT**	0.953 (0.901-1.008)	0.091
Minimum SBP post EVT**	0.983 (0.952-1.015)	0.297
Minimum DBP post EVT**	0.983 (0.939-1.030)	0.482
Mean SBP post EVT**	1.006 (0.976-1.037)	0.686
Mean DBP post EVT**	0.980 (0.929-1.034)	0.456
Systolic SD post EVT**	1.531 (1.203-1.948)	0.001	1.217 (0.803-1.842)	0.355
Systolic CV post EVT**	2.732E+28 (8.024E+12-9.303E+43)	<0.001	0.000 (0.000-7.704E+24)	0.221
Systolic SV post EVT**	2.046 (1.444-2.898)	<0.001	4.273 (1.030-17.727)	0.045

*Cut-off of P<0.05 was used for selection of candidate variables for inclusion in multivariable losistic regression models.

**During the 24 hours following the endovascular treatment

NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, SBP Systolic blood pressure, ASPECT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, MCA Middle cerebral artery, EVT Endovascular treatment; LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; DBP Diastolic blood pressure; SD Standard deviation; CV Coefficient of variation; SV Successive variation

Table 5 Cut-off values of systolic SV

Values	Best cut-off	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV*(%)	NPV*(%)
Systolic SV	12.499	93.3	73.8	71.1	91.2

SV Successive variation; PPV Positive predictive values; NPV Negative predictive values.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 26 Sep, 2019

Read the published version in BMC Neurology →

Review #1 received at journal
23 Jul, 2019
Editorial decision: Major revision
23 Jul, 2019
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
22 Jul, 2019
Review #2 received at journal
22 Jul, 2019
Reviewers invited by journal
17 Jul, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
17 Jul, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
08 Jul, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
07 Jul, 2019
Editor invited by journal
07 Jul, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Effect of short-term blood pressure variability on functional outcome after intra-arterial treatment in acute stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Patient selection

Data collection

BP monitoring and BPV presentation post EVT

Evaluation of functional prognosis

Statistical analysis

Results

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in the two outcome groups

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients

BPV and 3-month functional outcome

Table 3. Comparison of SBP and DBP variability parameters between different subgroups

Influencing factors of 3-month functional independence

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the favorable outcomes after EVT

mRS score distribution according to quartiles of systolic SV

ROC analysis

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Authors’ contributions

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Disclosures

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2