Leeches as the intermediate host for strigeid trematodes – genetic diversity and taxonomy of the genera Australapatemon Sudarikov, 1959 and Cotylurus Szidat, 1928

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-86226/v1

Abstract

Background

Leeches (Hirudinida) play a significant role as intermediate hosts in the circulation of trematodes in the aquatic environment. However, the species richness, molecular diversity and phylogeny of larval stages of Strigeidae trematodes (tetracotyle) occurring in this group of aquatic invertebrates remain poorly understood. In the present work, on the basis of recently obtained sequences of several molecular markers we analysed several aspects of the ecology, taxonomy and phylogeny of the genera Australapatemon and Cotylurus, which utilise leeches as intermediate hosts.

Methods

From April 2017 to September 2018, 153 leeches were collected from several sampling stations in small rivers with slow-flowing waters and related drainage canals located in three regions of Poland. The distinctive forms of tetracotyle metacercariae collected from leeches supplemented with adult Strigeidae specimens sampled from a wide range of water birds were analysed using the 28S rDNA partial gene, ITS2 region and the COI fragment.

Results

Among investigated leeches, metacercariae of the tetracotyle type were detected in the parenchyma and musculature of 62 specimens (prevalence 40.5%) with a mean intensity reaching 19.9 ind. The taxonomic generic affiliation of metacercariae derived from leeches revealed the occurrence of two Strigeidae genera: Australapatemon Sudarikov, 1959 and Cotylurus Szidat, 1928. Phylogenetic reconstructions based on the partial 28S rRNA gene, ITS2 region and partial COI gene confirmed the separation of the Australapatemon and Cotylurus clades. Unfortunately, regarding currently available molecular data and our results, it is not possible to precisely define the taxonomic position of the recently sequenced tetracotyle of Australapatemon. On the other hand, on the basis of the obtained sequences, supplemented with previously published data, the metacercariae of Cotylurus detected in leeches were identified as two species: C. strigeoides Dubois, 1958 and C. syrius Dubois, 1934. This is the first record of C. syrius from the intermediate host.

Conclusions

The results suggest the separation of ecological niches and life cycles between C. cornutus (Rudolphi, 1808) and C. strigeoides/C. syrius with potential serious evolutionary consequences for a wide range of host–parasite relationships. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses corroborated the polyphyletic character of C. syrius, the unclear status of C. cornutus and the separate position of Cotylurs raabei Bezubik, 1958 within Cotylurus. The data demonstrate the inconsistent and confusing taxonomic status of the sequenced tetracotyle of Australapatemon, resulting, in our opinion, from the limited availability of fully reliable, comparative sequences of related taxa in GenBank.

Background

Leeches (Hirudinida) are an abundant and widely distributed group of aquatic invertebrates. Aside from their significance in freshwater ecosystems as prey and predators [1], leeches are the second intermediate hosts for some trematodes from the family Strigeidae Railliet, 1919 (genera: Australapatemon Sudarikov, 1959; Cotylurus Szidat, 1928) and Cyathocotylidae Mühling, 1898 (genus Cyathocotyle Mühling, 1898) [2, 3, 4, 5]. These genera use prosobranch or pulmonate snails as their first intermediate hosts. Cercariae that are released from snails into the aquatic environment infect and develop in leeches to the invasive stage. Metacercariae (tetracotyle type in strigeid trematodes and prohemistomulum type in cyathocotylid trematodes) that develop in leeches are transmitted to the avian definitive hosts (a wide range of Anseriformes, but also recorded in Charadriiformes and Rallidae) by ingestion [5]. Despite the recognized role of leeches in the transmission of some digenean parasites in aquatic ecosystems there is insufficient understanding of host–parasite relationships within this group of annelids, and only a few papers have analysed various taxonomic (e.g., [3, 4, 5, 6]) and ecological (e.g., [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]) aspects of the occurrence and diversity of digenean larval stages in leeches. Moreover, contemporary understanding of the diversity of Strigeidae trematodes has been significantly changed by the recently discovered high level of interspecific and intergeneric homogeneity of morphological features related to an unexpectedly high level of genetic diversity, revealed within the genera Australapatemon and Cotylurus [12, 13, 14, 15]. Regarding these facts, several various aspects of the ecology, taxonomy and phylogeny of the genera Australapatemon and Cotylurus require urgent, detailed studies. Both genera possess a long and confusing history within Strigeidae. The genus Australapatemon was erected by Sudarikov [16] on the basis of the variability of the life cycles and structure of the cercarial protonephridial system observed in several species located previously in the genus Apatemon Szidat, 1928. In view of these differences, Sudarikov [16] redefined the genus Apatemon as characterised by cercariae with 10 flame cells and metacercariae encysted in fishes and erected the new genus Australapatemon, characterised by cercariae with 14 flame cells/protonephridia and metacercariae encysted in leeches. Since then, the taxonomic status and validity of these genera have been questioned and changed several times: some authors (e.g., [17, 18]) reduced Australapatemon to the level of a subgenus within Apatemon, while Yamaguti [19] restored it to the full generic rank, as further confirmed by Niewiadomska [20]. As the morphological differences between Apatemon and Australapatemon in both metacercariae as well as adult specimens are limited or subtle, these taxa have often been incorrectly determined (for details see [6] and references therein), and thus a few attempts to use molecular markers in the identification, taxonomy and phylogeny of these genera have been made in recent years [21, 22, 6, 12, 14, 23]. Importantly, a detailed molecular analysis of cercariae and adult specimens of Australapatemon sampled across North America clearly indicates the existence of several distinct lineages within this taxon and indisputably points out the hidden species diversity [12, 14]. In Europe, Huguenin et al. [24] identified several lineages within Australapatemon cercariae using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, but the taxonomic position and molecular diversity of larval stages of Australapatemon collected from a wide range of intermediate hosts (snails and leeches) have not been the subject of extensive studies. The genetic variability and species richness within the genus Australapatemon from various geographical regions thus remain relatively unknown. The structure and true diversity within this genus are thus still far from being established and require further detailed studies.

Another genus within Strigeideae that utilises hirudineans as hosts of invasive stages is the genus Cotylurus. This genus was erected by Szidat in 1928 for strigeid parasites of birds, and is characterised by vitellaria limited to the hindbody and a well-developed genital bulb. The metacercariae of Cotylurus occur in a wide range of snails and leeches [5]. In 1958 Bezubik [25] described a new species, Strigea raabei, based on trematode specimens collected from the bursa Fabricii of the garganey Spatula querquedula and ferruginous duck Aythya nyroca from eastern Poland, characterised by the presence of vitellaria both in the hind- and forebody (typical feature of the genus Strigea) and possessing a well-developed genital bulb (typical of the genus Cotylurus). Regarding these combinations of morphological features as unique, Sudarikov [26] erected the new genus Cotylurostrigea and placed in it two species: Colylurostrigea raabei and Cotylurostrigea strigeoides Dubois, 1958. However, Dubois [18] treated the genus Cotylurostrigea as a synonym of Cotylurus, while Yamaguti [19] gave Cotylurostrigea subgeneric status within the genus Strigea. Using the results of a cladistics analysis based on morphological and ecological features, Zazornova and Sysoev [27] recognized Cotylurostrigea as a synonym of Cotylurus, similar to Niewiadomska [20] in the most recent system of Strigeidae. In 1969, on the basis of differences in life cycles and cercariae morphology, Odening [28] erected two new subgenera within the genus Cotylurus: 1) Ichtyocotylurus, characterised by cercariae with two pairs of penetration glands located behind the ventral sucker, metacercariae in fish intermediate hosts, and fish-eating birds as final hosts; 2) Cotylurus, including species with cercariae characterised by two pairs of penetration glands located in front of the ventral sucker, metacercariae encysted in gastropods and leeches, and anseriform and charadriform birds as final hosts. Niewiadomska [29] regarded these taxa as valid and elevated both subgenera to the full generic rank, as confirmed in the most recent review [20]. However, species of Cotylurus show huge morphological variability, which led some authors to divide it into numerous subspecies with disputable validity [18], whereas others considered it as a polymorphic species with a wide host range and cosmopolitan distribution [30]. This led to basic problems with precise and adequate delimiting of particular species, which clearly indicates the need to use molecular techniques in studies on the taxonomy and phylogeny of Cotylurus. In recent years, Heneberg et al. [13] has combined a morphological and molecular analysis of central European Strigeidae from avian definitive hosts to investigate the taxonomic position of several Cotylurus species and surprisingly revealed a high level of molecular diversity within morphologically well-established species. Locke et al. [31] and Gordy and Hanington [14] also revealed the occurrence of several new species within this genus in Canada. These results clearly indicate the need for further, detailed morphological, molecular and phylogenetic studies.

Most of the recent molecular data concerning the taxonomy and structure of the genera Australapatemon and Cotylurus were based on free-living larval stages (cercariae), without a simultaneous analysis of the invasive stages in second intermediate hosts, or a comparative molecular and morphological analysis of adults. Moreover, the majority of contemporary studies were based on simple molecular markers enabling a fully reliable comparison of the results with other data [31, 14]. In the present paper, we describe the identity and molecular diversity of tetracotyle metacercariae detected in four taxa of freshwater leeches (Erpobdella octoculata, Glossiphonia complanata, Haemopis sanguisuga and Theromyzon tessulatum), collected from three distinct localities in southern and northern Poland and based on several molecular markers (28S and ITS2 rDNA, mitochondrial CO1). Our results were supplemented by data from the yet to be sequenced Cotylurus species, collected from avian hosts from northern Poland. On this basis, we present and discuss new data concerning the diversity and structure of the genera Cotylurus and Australapatemon. The presented study is the first comprehensive attempt to fully understand the identity and diversity of strigeid metacerariae from leech intermediate hosts in Central Europe.

Materials And Methods

Host sampling protocols and necropsy procedures

From April 2017 to September 2018, 153 leeches were collected from several sampling stations in small rivers with slow-flowing waters and related drainage canals located in three regions of Poland: Gdańsk Pomerania, Lower Silesia and Subcarpathia Province (Table 1, Fig. 1). Leeches were collected manually, using entomological nets and home-made aluminium traps with beef liver or chicken hearts as bait. Additionally, some specimens were sampled by hand from littoral stones and bottom detritus. The leeches were transferred to a plastic box with water and adequate ventilation, transported to the laboratory and stored in the fridge. Before necropsy, leeches were identified to the species level based on morphological characteristics provided by Bielecki et al. [32]. Identification based on morphological features was confirmed by molecular results using the 28S rRNA gene as a marker. Specimens of four species: Erpobdella octoculata (L., 1758), Glossiphonia complanata (L., 1758), Haemopis sanguisuga (L., 1758) and Theromyzon tessulatum Müller, 1774 were identified and examined for the presence of metacercariae (Table 1). After anaesthesia and then euthanasia, leeches were opened longitudinally, and the intestines were separated from the skin and transferred to Petri dishes with physiological sodium chloride solution and examined under a stereomicroscope. The distinctive forms of an unnamed tetracotyle metacercariae (both in pre-encystment stage and enclosed in an egg-shaped cyst) were extracted alive from the body cavity and mesenteries using preparation needles, washed in physiological sodium chloride solution, counted and fixed in hot 70% ethanol and preserved in the same medium for further processing. Material for further molecular analysis was randomly selected from the tetracotyle, according to the observed intensity of invasion: every tenth or fiftieth metacercariae (in the case of very low infection all metacercariae was sampled) from each infected host.

Several adult Strigeidae specimens collected from a wide range of water birds (mallard Anas platyrhynchos, gadwall Anas strepera, common pochard Aythya ferina, mute swan Cygnus olor, Eurasian coot Fulica atra) were used as reference material (Table S2). After isolation from the gastrointestinal tracts of the definitive avian hosts, the digeneas were rinsed in physiological salt solution, initially identified alive under the microscope and fixed in hot 70% ethanol for further morphological and molecular analyses. Next, the selected digeneans were stained with alcohol borax carmine, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted in Canada balsam. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Polish Collection of Parasitic Helminths, Museum of Natural History, Wrocław University, Poland.

The ecological terms used in this work are as defined by Bush et al. [33].

Molecular analysis

DNA was extracted from single, alcohol-fixed metacercariae and adult worms using a commercial kit, DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplification of the nuclear large ribosomal subunit gene (28S) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) as well as the mitochondrial gene encoding cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) was carried using KAPA2G Robust HotStart ReadyMix and primers selected based on the literature. A list of primers and the conditions of the PCR reaction are presented in Table S1.

The PCR results were visualized during electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. The products were purified with an Exo-BAP Kit (EURx) or QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) when non-specific products were present. Purified products were sequenced directly in both directions using the PCR primers. Contiguous sequences were assembled using Geneious software (Geneious 9.1.8; https://www.geneious.com). The representative sequences were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers presented in Table S2. The alignments included newly obtained sequences and closely related representatives of Strigeidae currently available in GenBank (Table S3) and were prepared using ClustalW multiple alignment implemented in MegaX [34]. Sequences of the 28S rDNA partial gene, ITS2 region and the COI fragment were aligned in three independent datasets. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using Bayesian inference (BI) criteria as implemented in MrBayes ver. 3.2.7 software [35] and were run on the three datasets individually. The general time reversible model with estimates of invariant sites and gamma distributed among-site variation (GTR + I + G) was identified as the best-fitting nucleotide substitution model for 28S and COI, and the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano substitution model with gamma distributed among-site variation (HKY + G) for ITS2, using jModelTest 2 software [36]. The consensus trees were visualized in FigTree ver. 1.4.4 software [37] and annotated in Corel®.

Additionally, we used GMYC analysis (the generalized mixed Yule coalescent model) as a tool for species delimitation [38, 39]. This method works for a single locus tree; we used the COI sequence to construct an ultrametric tree with BEAST v. 2.4.4 [40]. Prior to analysis the alignment was collapsed to unique haplotypes and the outgroup was removed. Thus, the GMYC analysis contained 33 haplotypes, the nucleotide substitution model was set to HKY + G and we used the coalescent model with constant population size (which is the most appropriate for modeling the relationships among individuals from the same species) with strict clock. GMYC analysis was done in R software (R v. 4.0.2) with the following packages: “ape”, “paran”, “rncl” and “splits”.

Results

Parameters of infection

Within the 153 investigated leeches, metacercariae of the tetracotyle type (both encysted and non-encysted) were detected in the parenchyma and musculature of 62 specimens (overall prevalence 40.5%) from two localities: Gdańsk Pomerania (51 infected among 66 investigated H. sanguisuga) and Lower Silesia (3 infected among 13 necropsied specimens of Erpobdella octoculata and 8 infected among 37 H. sanguisuga); none of the specimens of G. complanata and T. tessulatum were infected (Table 1). The highest prevalence of metacercariae was observed among leeches collected from Gdańsk Pomerania (Table 1). Leeches sampled in Subcarpatia Province were not infected. Regarding host species, the highest prevalence was observed in H. sanguisuga (59 infected, prevalence 50.9%).

The highest mean intensity was detected among leeches from Gdańsk Pomerania (23.1 ind.); a much lower mean prevalence was recorded in Lower Silesia (5.6 ind.). Regarding host species, the highest mean intensity was noted in H. sanguisuga (20.8 ind.) (Table 1).

Molecular identification of detected metacercariae and phylogenetic analyses

The taxonomic generic affiliation of encysted and non-encysted metacercariae derived from leeches was conducted based on BLAST comparison of sequences of 28S rDNA and resulted in confirmation of the occurrence of two Strigeidae genera: Australapatemon and Cotylurus.

Although comprehensive molecular studies of the structure of the Strigeidae are rather rare in the literature, a few taxonomic studies concerning the systematic position of several genera within Strigeidae have been published recently [6, 13]. Based on the results of these studies, and given the main aim of the current study (identification and molecular diversity of strigeid metacercariae in leeches from Central Europe), the structure of our datasets was determined, first of all, by the availability of sequences from previously published European isolates. Thus, the presented analyses are focused mainly on the identity, molecular diversity and phylogenetic relationships within two genera from which larval stages were detected in leeches: Australapatemon and Cotylurus. As the sequences of Australapatemon and Cotylurus published previously by Heneberg et al. [13] constituted a significant part of the comparative material necessary for establishing the taxonomic position of the recently collected and analysed materials, the alignments used for our phylogenetic analyses of the ITS region and COI gene were trimmed to the length used in the cited work [13], i.e. 270 bp for ITS2 and 295 bp for COI. However, full length received alignments were deposited in GenBank. The length of the 28S alignment was 980 bp and included almost all sequences of Australapatemon and Cotylurus available in GenBank except that of C. gallinulae (length 700 bp). Phylogenetic reconstructions of the partial 28S rRNA gene, ITS2 region and partial COI gene clearly confirmed the separation of the Australapatemon and Cotylurus clades.

Australapatemon

The genetic divergence between Australapatemon specimens obtained from leeches in the present work was considered negligible based on the 28S sequences and no intraspecific variability was detected within localities (Fig. 2). These sequences clustered in a well-supported clade with sequences obtained from trematodes identified as Australapatemon burti, isolates from an adult fluke from Mexico (MF398342) and cercaria from Canada (KY207625), larvae identified as Australapatemon sp. from Canada (MF124269, MF124270) and the adult form of Au. niewiadomski from New Zealand (KT334164, KT334165) (Fig. 2). The similarity of new sequences with the sequences mentioned above ranged from 99.9% (one nucleotide different) for Au. burti to 99.4% for Au. niewiadomski (six nucleotides different). The sequence of an isolate identified as Australapatemon sp. obtained from Anas strepera showed 100% homology with previously published sequences of Au. burti KY207625 and MF398342 (based on 1244 and 1207 bp respectively).

The DNA sequences of the ITS2 fragment from metacercariae sampled from leeches in the present study showed 100% identity among themselves and with sequences of Au. minor from Anas platyrhynchos from the Czech Republic (MF628095) and Au. burti from cercariae from Slovakia (KU950451) and Canada (KY207626), as well as with an isolate from the USA described as Australapatemon sp. (KY570947). These sequences formed one clade with trematodes identified as Au. mclaughlini (one nucleotide different in comparison with isolates from leeches) and Au. burti from Mexico (two nucleotides different) (Fig. 3).

Newly generated COI sequences from leeches formed a well-supported clade with Au. minor (MF6280066) within the Australapatemon branch (Fig. 4). Unfortunately, there are no available sequences of Au. burti that could be added to this analysis, thus, we were unable to determine the final taxonomic affiliation of isolates from leeches, given that the analyses of the 28S and ITS datasets did not give conclusive results.

Our phylogenetic analyses carried out separately based on three genetic markers demonstrated with strong support the sister relationship among Australapatemon and some species of Apatemon: A. gracilis and Apatemon sp.“jamiesoni” (Fig. 2). However, the taxonomic position of Ap. fuligulae remains unclear: in phylogenetic reconstructions derived from the 28S and ITS2 datasets this species nested between Australapatemon isolates, but according to the result of the COI analysis Ap. fuligulae from Poland and the Czech Republic clustered with Apatemon sp.“jamiesoni”, although without strong support. Simultaneously, sequences of Apatemon/Australapatemonfuhrmanni, the generic affiliation of which was discussed by Heneberg et al. [13], were located inside the Australapatemon clade generated based on ITS2 and COI dataset analyses (Fig. 3, 4).

Cotylurus

The newly generated sequences of 28S rDNA, the ITS2 region and COI mtDNA derived from metacercariae obtained from leeches fall in two well-supported lineages corresponding to Cotylurus strigeoides Dubois, 1958 (isolate from Anas platyrhynchos) and C. syrius Dubois, 1934 (100% homology with isolates from Cygnus olor from Poland and the Czech Republic; accession numbers MF628093, MF628099 for ITS2 and MF628057, MF628059 for COI). The intraspecific genetic divergence between sequences in clades grouping metacercariae and the adult form of C. strigeoides ranged from 0% to 0.2% for the 28S dataset, from 0% to 1.5% for ITS2, and from 1% to 1.7% for the COI dataset.

The analysis of 28S rDNA and COI sequences showed the distinct position of C. raabei, while other members of the genus Cotylurus formed the clade within which C. strigeoides appeared as a sister lineage to the group including C. cornutus (Rudolphi, 1808), C. syrius, and recently obtained sequences of C. hebraicus Dubois, 1934. Moreover, all three phylogenetic analyses corroborated the polyphyletic character of C. syrius and also showed the unclear status of C. cornutus (Fig. 2–4). Two recently obtained isolates of adult trematodes from Cygnus olor were located within two separate lineages of C. syrius, but two isolates from metacercariae were located within only one of them.

The sequence of 28S rDNA from C. cornutus obtained in the present study (adult trematode from Anas platyrhynchos) clustered together with isolates determined as C. cornutus derived from metacercariae from Norway (KY513180-KY513182) with similarity of 99.6–99.7%. However, due to the lack of comparative sequence material for the ITS region and COI mtDNA and the ambiguous position of our C. cornutus isolate in the trees generated based on the above datasets (Fig. 3, 4), the taxonomic status of this species remains unclear.

GMYC results

Within the 33 haplotypes GMYC analysis revealed the presence of 13 species and generally confirmed of clades derived by Bayesian analysis (Fig. 5). It seems that all larval forms of strigeid flukes obtained from leeches could be matched to three species, i.e. Australapatemon minor and Cotylurus strigeoides and C. syrius (not shown in the tree as it had an identical haplotype to the GenBank sequence). However, in the case of the C. strigeoides and C. syrius clade, GMYC support reached 86% while for the Au. minor clade it was 51%. 

Discussion

The results reveal several new and important insights into the diversity of strigeid trematodes occurring in freshwater leeches in Central Europe and clearly emphasize the importance of this group of aquatic invertebrates in the circulation of trematodes in the aquatic environment. The observed prevalence of tetracotyle metacercariae detected in leeches (40.5%) was relatively high compared to other studies from central and eastern Europe: during investigations of parasites of species-rich and diverse communities of leeches in the eutrophic Drużno Lake (northern Poland) Dobrowolski [3] detected larvae of strigeid and cyathocotylid trematodes among 20% of analysed leeches, while in lakes of Kazakhastan Zhatkanbaeva [41] and Zhatkanbaeva and Akhmetova [42] detected tetracotyle metacercariae in 19.4% of the investigated leeches. On the other hand, studies from eastern Europe revealed the prevalence of tetracotyle metacercariae at much higher levels: in the Volga estuary Sudarikov et al. [43] found metacercariae in 60% (75 of 125) of analysed leeches, and Rajshite [44] detected strigeid metacercariae in 53% of leeches from the Volga and Niemen estuaries.

Tetracotyle metacercariae usually classified as Tetracotyle typica de Fillippi, 1855 have been widely recorded from snails and leeches in Europe, but their real taxonomic status has remained unknown for many years. Meanwhile, the adult form of T. typica sampled from snails has been identified as Cotylurus cornutus (Rudolphi, 1808) (for details see Sudarikov [16] and references therein). Szidat [45] reared adult trematodes from metacercariae of T. typica from the gonads of two species of leech (Erpobdella octoculata and Heamopis sanguisuga) and also identified them as C. cornutus. These results prove the possibility of the occurrence of tetracotyles of C. cornutus in two, clearly distinct groups of intermediate host, i.e. snails and leeches. The identification of T. typica from leeches as C. cornutus confirmed the results of Timon-David [46] and Dobrowolski [3]. Using material collected from leeches, Szidat [45, 47] described for the first time another type of metacercariae, Tetracotyle gracilis, and identified the adult form of it as Apatemon gracilis (Rudolphi, 1819). During studies concerning the taxonomic composition of strigeid metacercariae from leeches of the Volga estuary Sudarikov et al. [43] confirmed the validity of T. gracilis as the adult form of A. gracilis but questioned the status of T. typica from leeches as C. cornutus. In their opinion, T. typica from leeches represents another species that is closely related to C. cornutus. Sudarikov et al.’s conclusions [43] were further confirmed by Vojtek et al. [4], who also stated that tetracotyle larvae of Cotylurus from leeches probably belong to a closely related, but different species of Cotylurus than tetracotyle larvae from snails that are commonly accepted in the contemporary literature as C. cornutus. However, these hypotheses were never confirmed and the issue of the identity and taxonomic position of Cotylurus metacercariae occurring in leeches and snails remained unresolved for years. According to the literature, the occurrence of tetracotyles of four species of Cotylurus has been detected in leeches: C. cornutus, C. hebraicus Dubois, 1934 C. strigeoides Dubois, 1958 and C. szidati Zazornova, 1991 [48, 49, 50, 51, 5]. Among these, tetracotyles of two species (C. cornutus, C. strigeoides) were also recorded from snail intermediate hosts [48, 5]. However, their real taxonomic position remains doubtful because of the subtle morphological differences between the tetracotyle forms of Cotylurus [51]. Moreover, the taxonomic consequences of morphological variability observed among tetracotyles of Cotylurus have not been confirmed by molecular studies. For these reasons, recent knowledge concerning the morphology and taxonomic position of tetracotyles from snails and leeches should be considered as deeply insufficient and requires urgent verification using molecular studies based on well-determined reference materials from definitive hosts. Importantly, recent molecular studies have revealed unexpected high molecular diversity within Cotylurus [31, 14], including morphologically well-established species [13].

In the present study, metacercariae of Cotylurus detected in leeches were identified as two species, C. strigeoides and C. syrius, and this was confirmed by the parallel, comparative morphological and molecular analysis of adult specimens sampled from definitive avian hosts and GenBank sequences. Importantly, while leeches and snails are recognized as the second intermediate host for C. strigeoides [51, 5], the life cycle of C. syrius remains unknown. Our molecular identification of metacercariae detected in H. sanguisuga from Gdańsk Pomerania as C. syrius for the first time clearly indicates the route of transmission of this strigeid to the avian definitive hosts by leeches and emphasizes the importance of this invertebrate as a second intermediate host. Moreover, we consider the lack of tetracotyle forms of Cotylurus cornutus in leeches as really surprising. In Poland, this strigeid species is one of the most important elements ofthe trematode fauna of anseriform birds [52]. The prevalence of C. cornutus in the population of mallard Anas platyrhynchos from Gdańsk Pomerania is about 20% (G. Kanarek, unpublished data), which could reflect the common occurrence of its invasive stages in the aquatic environment in the study area. In this context, the absence of metacercariae of C. cornutus in the helminth fauna of leeches suggests that the invasive form of this trematode species does not use leeches as intermediate hosts. This observation, along with other recently obtained results (identification of C. syrius and C. strigeoides in the leech helminth fauna), supports the hypothesis previously formulated by Sudarikov et al. [43] and Vojtek et al. [4] that tetracotyles of C. cornutus occur only in snail intermediate hosts, while the tetracotyle form detected in leeches represents different species of Cotylurus. Moreover, the real species composition and molecular diversity within the genus Cotylurus that utilises various invertebrate hosts (snails and leeches) remains unknown. Additionally, the presented results clearly indicate the separation of ecological niches and life cycles between some species of Cotylurus, with potential serious evolutionary consequences for a wide range of host–parasite relationships.

The obtained results clearly confirm the validity of the genus Cotylurus. All markers placed analysed members of this genus in one, well-supported clade with high diversity within the clade. However, the observed phylogenetic relationships within Cotylurus varied in relation to the analysed loci, which in our opinion, reflects the limited availability of fully reliable comparative sequences from related taxa in GenBank. Despite this, the sequenced specimens of C. strigeoides (both adults and tetracotyle) formed a well-supported separate clade that was particularly well defined in the phylogeny based on 28S rDNA loci (Fig. 2). In the analysis based on the ITS2 marker, isolates of C. strigeoides created a sister branch to a single isolate of C. gallinulae (JX978441) sampled from Aythya affinis in Mexico and provided by Hernández-Mena et al. [53] (Fig. 3). Heneberg et al. [13] suggested a high level of similarity between some lineages of C. cornutus (isolates from Anas crecca from the Czech Republic) and sequences C. gallinulae (JX978441), but our phylogeny, based on several new isolates and supplemented by GenBank data, did not confirm these assumptions. The current phylogeny based on ITS2 sequences (270 bp length) revealed only 0.4% difference (one nucleotide) between C. gallinulae (JX978441) from Mexico and recently obtained sequences of C. strigeoides (both adults and metacercariae), which strongly suggests that they are conspecific. Moreover, Locke et al. [31] suggested the identity of CO1 sequences of Cotylurus strigeoides sampled from Aythya collaris in Canada (MH581280-2) and C. gallinulae (JX977781) provided by Hernández-Mena et al. [53]. Importantly, both JX978441 and recently sequenced adult specimens of C. strigeoides were sampled from anatid birds, which are recognized as the typical final hosts for this trematode species, while C. gallinulae is recognized as a typical parasite of Rallidae. According to Locke et al. [31], this suggests the possibility of incorrect determination of the material from Mexico. Another interesting question related to the position of C. gallinulae is the validity of recently sequenced specimens of Cotylurus hebraicus. This species was first described on the basis of trematodes collected from the Eurasian coot Fulica atra sampled in the territory of Syria and further placed as a subspecies within Cotylurus gallinulae as Cotylurus gallinulae hebraicus together with C. gallinulae gallinulae (Lutz, 1928) Dubois, 1937, C. gallinulae ban Yamaguti, 1939 and C. gallinulae vitellosus Lumsden et Zischke, 1963, which suggests their close affinity [18]. All these taxa are recognized as typical parasites of coots, moorhens and rails, but with different geographical distributions. Some authors [54, 55] recognized C. hebraicus as a valid taxon with species rank, and this was confirmed in a recently obtained phylogeny, but the real taxonomic position and validity of other subspecies remain to be established. In our opinion, given their morphological similarity and narrow range of hosts, subspecies within C. gallinulae should be treated as a synonym of Cotylurus hebraicus. Confirmation of this hypothesis requires a detailed analysis of strigeid trematodes collected from typical avian final hosts (Rallidae) from a wide geographic distribution and comparison with sequenced specimens of C. hebraicus and other Cotylurus taxa.

Our results reveal the unclear taxonomic position and composite structure of C. syrius and C. cornutus, as reported previously by Heneberg et al. [13]. According to these authors, trematode specimens morphologically identified as C. syrius and sampled from the typical host, the mute swan Cygnus olor, represent two distinct molecular lineages: one recognized as the typical C. syrius sensu stricto, and the other, according to Heneberg et al. [13], as a C. cornutus-like isolate due to its similarity to sequences obtained from adult specimens of C. cornutus sampled from Eurasian teal Anas crecca. Recently obtained sequences of the CO1 and ITS2 loci obtained from metacercariae sampled from H. sanguisuga from Gdańsk Pomerania and adult trematodes collected from a swan from Kraków are almost identical to sequences obtained by Heneberg et al. [13] from adult specimens of C. syrius sensu stricto (MF628093, MF628099 for ITS2; MF628057, MF628059 for CO1) (Fig. 3, 4). The identity of the abovementioned sequences was also confirmed using the 28S rDNA locus (Fig. 2). Additionally, sequences of the ITS2 fragment isolated from adult specimens of C. syrius sampled from Cy. olor from Lower Silesia were closely related to the sequence reported by Heneberg et al. [13] (MF628091) and described as C. cornutus-like isolates of C. syrius (Fig. 3). Phylogenetic reconstruction based on the CO1 locus and the GMYC analysis revealed a separate lineage clustering C. cornutus-like C. syrius with isolates of C. cornutus obtained from the typical definitive host, the mallard Anas platyrhynchos (Fig. 5). Sequences of the CO1 locus of C. cornutus obtained in the current study differed from sequences reported by Heneberg et al. [13] under the name C. cornutus (MF628064) and were almost identical to recently sequenced adult specimens and the tetracotyle of C. strigeoides (Fig. 4, 5). The obtained sequences supplemented with GenBank data clearly confirmed the existence of three distinct lineages within species morphologically identified as C. syrius: one lineage identified by Heneberg et al. [13] as C. syrius sensu stricto, recorded from the definitive host Cy. olor from the Czech Republic and Poland (Kraków) and in the tetracotyle from the leech H. sanguisuga from Gdańsk Pomerania, and two lineages identified by Heneberg et al. [13] as C. cornutus-like C. syrius. One of them grouped some specimens of C. syrius sampled from a typical definitive host, the swan Cy. olor, from the Czech Republic and Poland (Lower Silesia), and the second, collected from Cy. olor from the Czech Republic. The CO1 locus of the latter is almost identical to that of C. cornutus collected from the typical definitive host, the mallard A. platyrhynchos from Poland (Vistula Lagoon). In this context, swans in Central Europe can be parasitized by three (not two, as suggested previously by Heneberg et al. [13]), morphologically indistinguishable but molecularly different species of Cotylurus, classified as C. cornutus or C. syrius. In this regard, our results clearly reveal the urgent need to verify the validity and range of morphological criteria enabling the identification of adult specimens of some Cotylurus species.

Recently obtained data revealed the separate position of Cotylurs raabei within Cotylurus. For many years, this species was placed in the genus Cotylurus [18], Cotylurostrigea Sudarikov, 1961 [26, 54] or Strigea [25, 19]. Based on the results of morphological and cladistics analysis Zazornova and Sysoev [27] synonymised Cotylurostrigea with Cotylurus and placed C. raabei within the latter. In the phylogeny based on 28S rDNA and COI markers the position of this species is separate, forming a sister branch to the other Cotylurus species (Figs. 2 and 4), and C. raabei is clearly distinct, while in the phylogeny based on the ITS region this species is placed in a lineage between the recently sequenced C. hebraicus and isolates of cercarial Cotylurus sp. infecting Biomphalaria straminea in Brazil (MN179272 and MN179271) [15]. The ITS2 sequences (270 bp) from C. raabei differed by 4.8% from C. hebraicus and by 5.2% from Cotylurus sp. from Brazil (MN179272 and MN179271). Given the inconsistent results obtained from the analysis of different loci, the taxonomic status of C. raabei remains unexplained and awaits further studies.

Another problem that is rarely mentioned in the contemporary literature is the identification, genetic variability and taxonomic position of metacercariae of Australapatemon from leeches. Due to their morphological similarity the metacercariae and adults of Australapatemon have for many years been erroneously confused with Apatemon e.g. [6]. According to the literature, one of the features enabling fully reliable differentiation between the genera Australapatemon and Apatemon (other than the structure of excretory systems in cercariae) is the host of the invasive stages (fish in Apatemon, leeches in Australapatemon). However, this is not true in all cases. Negm-Eldin and Davies [56] revealed that metacercariae of Apatemon hypseleotris from Australia can develop in both leeches and fish. Regarding fact, that structure of cercariae of A. hypseleotris are typical for genus Australapatemon (14 flame cells), the taxonomic position of this species should be elucidated in further analysis [6]. Another species of Apatemon with a doubtful taxonomic position and metacercariae in leeches is Apatemon jamesi [57]. On the other hand, all species of Australapatemon with described life cycles utilise leeches as the hosts of invasive stages [58, 59, 19, 60, 10, 61, 6]. Unfortunately, studies concerning the identitification, taxonomic position and diversity of Australapatemon metacercariae occurring in leeches from various ecosystems are scarce.

Similar to the phylogenetic relationships within the genus Cotylurus discussed above, the phylogenetic relationships among Australapatemon varied with the loci analysed, which again, in our opinion, reflects the limited availability of fully reliable comparative sequences of related taxa in GenBank. Our data illustrate the inconsistent and confusing taxonomic status of sequenced tetracotyles of Australapatemon. Regarding the 28S rDNA fragment, the results revealed the greatest similarity to the sequences of Au. burti from Mexico (MF398342–99.9%, one nucleotide different), and Au. niewiadomski from New Zealand (KT334164, KT334165–99.4%, six nucleotides different) (Fig. 2). These results are in partial disagreement with sequences of ITS2 fragment recently sampled from metacercariae from leeches that showed 100% similarity with sequences described as Au. minor from Anas platyrhynchos from the Czech Republic (MF628095) and Au. burti from cercariae from Slovakia (KU950451) and the USA (KY570947). Moreover, to increase confusion, the sequences of ITS2 were also similar to those from a trematode identified as Au. mclaughlini (one nucleotide different compared to recently obtained isolates) and Au. burti from Mexico (two nucleotides different). The CO1 sequence analysis also gave inconclusive results: all sequences were placed in a separate clade, sister to Au. minor (MF628066) from Anas platyrhynchos from the Czech Republic (Fig. 4) and revealed high intraspecific diversity. Therefore, in the light of currently available molecular data in GenBank and our results, it is not possible to precisely define the taxonomic position of the recently sequenced tetracotyle of Australapatemon. The taxonomic position of the trematode identified as Australapatemon sp. collected from Anas strepera from Vistula Lagoon is also ambiguous: recently obtained sequences of 28S rDNA showed 100% homology with previously published sequences of Au. burti from Canada (KY207625) [12] and Mexico (MF398342) [62]. Regarding the ITS2 fragment, our isolates presented the highest similarity with sequences of Australapatemon sp. (MK168687 and MK168688) from France [24]. Based on the CO1 locus, an isolate of Australapatemon sp. from Anas strepera creates a separate branch to all other Australapatemon sequences available in GenBank, indicating its separate position (Fig. 4).

The phylogeny based on 28 rDNA and ITS2 strongly suggests unclear relationships between Au. burti and Au. minor. Australapatemon burti (Miller, 1923) was originally described from North America and often misreported as Apatemon gracilis [59, 63, 64, 65, 16], and has recently been widely recorded from the Holarctic (Central Europe) [66, 67, 22] and Neotropical regions [68, 69, 53, 6 and references therein], which strongly suggests the cosmopolitan distribution of this species. Au. minor Yamaguti, 1933 is recognized as a typical parasite of Anseriformes in the Palearctic region [18, 70]. Therefore, the sympatric occurrence of these two species (Au. burti and Au. minor) in the territory of Central Europe would not be surprising. Moreover, the study area in Gdańsk Pomerania (near the Gulf of Gdańsk and Vistula Lagoon) is recognized as a well-known refuge of water and wetland birds. In addition to the rich and diversified fauna of breeding birds, these places are an important resting place for birds migrating mainly from the north and north-east [71], which creates the possibility of bringing some species of helminths by migrating birds from nesting grounds located e.g., on the Scandinavian Peninsula or Siberia. For this reason, helminth taxa unusual for this geographical region could appear, especially in avian definitive hosts during migration. Such conditions require extreme caution in the interpretation of molecular data. Unfortunately, while fragments of 28S rDNA clearly revealed the similarity of recently obtained isolates from tetracotyle and adult Austalapatemon sp. with sequences of A. burti, sequences of ITS2 isolates from tetracotyle showed 100% homology with sequences described as Au. minor and Au. burti. The main underlying problem is that the only sequences of ITS2 and CO1 fragments of Au. minor available in GenBank and provided by Heneberg et al. [13] are rather short (270 bp for ITS2 and 295 bp for COI), which forced the shortening of our sequences and precluded the full comparison of these sequences with other data (based on full-length fragments). In phylogenetic analysis fragments of this limited length have limited significance and reduce the reliability of any conclusions.

Our results revealed the discursive and inconsistent status of the genera Apatemon and Australapatemon. In the phylogenies based on 28S rDNA and ITS2, all analysed Australapatemon sequences were placed in one, well-supported clade, separate from other Strigeidae genera (Cotylurus and Apatemon), with the exception of sequences of Apatemon fuligulae, which were located between Australapatemon (Fig. 2, 3). In the phylogeny based on COI fragments, our sequences of Ap. fuligulae were almost identical to sequences of Ap. fuligulae submitted by Heneberg et al. [13] (MF628055), which confirmed the valid determination of this species. Importantly, both isolates were placed in a branch with other Apatemon species. The different generic position of Ap. fuligulae obtained in phylogenies based on various other loci may indicate the inappropriate current status of this species. These suspicions were confirmed by the phylogeny based on 28S rDNA fragments: sequences of Ap. fuligulae were similar to Canadian sequences of Australapatemon sp. (MF124270, three nucleotides different) provided by Gordy et al. [12] and isolated from an adult trematode specimen collected from the northern pintail Anas acuta and cercariae emerging from Stagnicola elodes. On the other hand, Yamaguti [72] detected the metacercariae of Ap. fuligulae (Tetracotyle fuligulae) in the skin and musculature of fish (Parasilurus asotus, Pseudobagrus aurantiacus) from Lake Biwa. Therefore, the taxonomic position of Ap. fuligulae should be considered as doubtful. Establishing its position will require further studies concerning both the genetic variability within this species and a detailed analysis of the morphology of cercariae and adults and the life cycle of Ap. fuligulae.

In conclusion, in our opinion, the unclear and inconsistent status of Apatemon and Australapatemon, visible especially using the CO1 and ITS markers, results mainly from the invalid determination of sequenced adult and larval trematodes: from a morphological point of view, as mentioned in the Introduction, the two genera are quite similar and often misidentified in the literature. Erroneous determination of sequenced adult and larval stages of both Apatemon and Australapatemon result in the erroneous description of the sequences deposited in GenBank, which increases the chaos in phylogenies based on them. Based on our own experience concerning the morphology of these genera and their ecology, as well as the literature, which show key differences between the life cycles of Apatemon and Austalapatemon, we believe that these genera are valid and distinct, as confirmed by the 28S rDNA sequences. However, full confirmation of this assertion requires a meticulous review of all sequences of Apatemon and Austalapatemon deposited in GenBank, which is not possible without detailed resolution of the life cycles of particular species within these genera.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that encysted and non-encysted tetracotyle metacercariae derived from leeches from Poland represents two separate strigeid genera: Australapatemon and Cotylurus. Obtained data demonstrate the inconsistent and confusing taxonomic status of tetracotyle from the genus Australapatemon, while the metacercariae of Cotylurus were identified as two species, C. strigeoides and C. syrius. Our ecological and molecular data suggest, that tetracotyle of C. cornutus occur only in snail intermediate hosts, while the tetracotyle form detected in leeches represents non-C. cornutus species. On this base, we suggest the separation of ecological niches and life cycles between C. cornutus and C. strigeoides/C. syrius with potential evolutionary consequences for a wide range of host–parasite relationships.

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in present article and supplementary material, all necessary sequences were deposited in GenBank database.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

Research work partially financed under the project of the Minister of Science and Higher Education (Poland) under the name: “Iuventus plus", grant no. 9003/IP1//2015/73

Authors’ contributions

JH and EP conceived and designed the study. JH and GK collected leeches in the field. EP performed necropsy of annelids and processed material for further research. GK sampled and identified trematode specimens from avian hosts. EP, JH and GZ performed molecular and phylogenetic analyses. EP, GK and JH drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We kindly thank Dr. Marta Basiaga (Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Poland) for providing trematode material from mute swan. The authors are very grateful to Wiesław Podsiadły, Hunting Club “Żuławy” in Nowy Dwór Gdański, Poland, from providing specimens of ducks and coots from Vistula Lagoon. We also highly acknowledge Iwona Maściuch and Anna Wojtoń for helping in parasitological laboratory work.

References

  1. Mann KH. Leeches (Hirudinea). Their Structure, Physiology, Ecology and Embryology. London: Pergamon Press; 1962. p. 201.
  2. Wiśniewski WL. Cercaria dubia sp. n. und deren weitere Entwicklung in Herpobdella atomaria. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 1935;Ser.II(1-2);19-36.
  3. Dobrowolski K. Parasites of leeches of Drużno Lake. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 1958;6:179-194.
  4. Vojtek J, Opravilová V, Vojtková L. The importance of leeches in the life cycle of the order Strigeidida. Folia Parasitol. 1967;14:107-120.
  5. Sudarikov VE, Shigin AA, Kurochkin YV, Lomakin VV, Stenko RP, Yurlova NI. Trematode metacercariae – parasites of freshwater animals in Central Russia. Moskva: Rossiyskaya Akademia Nauk, Izdatelstvo Nauka; 2002. (in Russian)
  6. Blasco-Costa I, Poulin R, Presswell B. Species of Apatemon Szidat, 1928 and Australapatemon Sudarikov, 1959 (Trematoda: Strigeidae) from New Zealand: linking and characterising life cycle stages with morphology and molecules. Parasitol. Res. 2016;115:271-289.
  7. Spelling SM, Young JO. The population dynamics of metacercariae of Apatemon gracilis (Trematoda: Digenea) in three species of lake-dwelling leeches. Parasitology. 1986;93:517-530.
  8. Spelling SM, Young JO. Seasonal occurrence of metacercariae of the trematode Cotylurus cornutus (Szidat) in three species of lake-dwelling leeches. J. Parasitol. 1986;72:837-845.
  9. Spelling SM, Young JO. Predation on lake-dwelling leeches (Annellida: Hirudinea): an evaluation by field experiment. J Anim Ecol. 1987;43:131-146.
  10. McCarthy AM. Experimental observations on the specifity of Apatemon (Australapatemon) minor (Yamaguti 1933) (Digenea: Strigeidae) toward leech (Hirudinea) second intermediate host. J. Helminthol. 1990;64:161-167.
  11. Karvonen A, Faltýnková A, Choo JM, Valtonen ET. Infection, specifity and host manipulation of Australapatemon sp. (Trematoda, Strigeidae) in two sympatric species of leeches (Hirudinea). Parasitology. 2017;144:1-10.
  12. Gordy MA, Locke SA, Rawlings TA, Lapierre AR, Hanington PC. Molecular and morphological evidence for nine species in North American Australapatemon (Sudarikov, 1959): a phylogeny expansion with description of the zygocercous Australapatemon mclaughlini n. sp. Parasitol. Res. 2017;116:2181-2198.
  13. Heneberg P, Sitko J, Těšínský M, Rząd I, Bizos J. Central European Strigeidae Railliet, 1919 (Trematoda: Strigeidida): Molecular and comparative morphological analysis suggests the reclassification of Parastrigea robusta Szidat, 1928 into Strigea Abildgaard, 1790. Parasitol Int. 2018 Dec;67(6):688-701. 
  14. Gordy MA, Hanington PC. A fine-scale phylogenetic assessment of digenean trematodes in central Alberta reveals we have yet to uncover their total diversity. Ecol Evol. 2019;9:3153-3238.
  15. López-Hernández D, Locke SA, de Assis JCA, Drago FB, de Melo AL, Rabelo ÉML, Pinto HA. Molecular, morphological and experimental-infection studies of cercariae of five species in the superfamily Diplostomoidea (Trematoda: Digenea) infecting Biomphalaria straminea (Mollusca: Planorbidae) in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2019;199:105082.
  16. Sudarikov V. Order Strigeidida (La Rue, 1926) Part 1. Morphological characteristics of strigeids and superfamily Strigeoidea Railliet, 1919. In: Skrjabin KI, editors. Trematodes of animals and man. Osnovy Trematodologii; 1959. p. 217–631. (in Russian)
  17. Dubois G, Pearson JC. Quelques Strigeida (Trematoda) IV. Mem. Soc. Sci. Nat. Neuchatel. 1965;88:77-99.
  18. Dubois G. Synopsis des Strigeidae et des Diplostomatidae (Trematoda). Mem. Soc. Sci. Nat. Neuchatel. 1968;10:1-258.
  19. Yamaguti S. Synopsis of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Co.; 1971.
  20. Niewiadomska K. Family Strigeidae Railliet, 1919. In: Gibson DI, Jones A, Bray RA, editors. Keys to the Trematoda. Wallingford: CABI Publishing and The Natural History Museum; 2002. p. 231-241.
  21. Bell AS, Somerville C. Molecular evidence for the synonymy of two species of Apatemon Szidat, 1928, A. gracilis (Rudolphi, 1819) and A. annuligerum (von Normann, 1832) (Digenea: Strigeidae) parasitic as metacercariae in British fishes. J Helminthol. 2002;76:193-198.
  22. Aksenova OV, Bespalaya YV, Bolotov IN, Kondakov AV, Sokolova SE. First molecular identification of Australapatemon burti (Miller, 1932) (Trematoda: Digenea: Strigeidae) from an intermediate host Radix labiate (Rossmaessler) (Gastropoda: Lymneidae) in Europe. Zootaxa. 2016;4132:588-590.
  23. Nezhybová V, Blažek R, Kašný M, Slamková D, Leontovyč R, Ondračková M. Morphological and molecular characterization of Apatemon sp. infecting killifish in Mozambique. Parasitol. Int. 2019;73:101967.
  24. Huguenin A, Depaquit J, Villena I, Ferté H. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: a new tool for rapid identification of cercariae (Trematoda, Digenea). Parasite. 2019;26:11.
  25. Bezubik B. Strigea raabei sp. n., a new trematode from wild ducks of Poland. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 1958;6:309-318.
  26. Sudarikov VE. A new trematode genus – Cotylurostrigea nov. gen. (family Strigeidae) from water birds. Trudy GELAN. 1961;11:263-264. (in Russian)
  27. Zazornova OP, Sysoev AV. Phylogenetic relations between species of the genus Cotylurus and its position in the system of the trematode family Strigeidae. Parazitologiya. 1993;27:69-76. (in Russian)
  28. Odening K. Zur Gliederung von Apatemon and Cotylurus (Trematoda, Strigeidae) in Untergattungen. Ber.Akad.Wiss.Berlin. 1969;11:285-292.
  29. Niewiadomska K. On the necessity of dividing the genus Cotylurus Szidat, 1928 into two valid genera Cotylurus Szidat, 1928 and Ichthyocotylurus Odening, 1969 (Strigeidae). Acta Parasitol. Pol. 1971;19:113-120.
  30. Beverly-Burton M. Studies on the trematode of British freshwater birds. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1961;137:13-39.
  31. Locke SA, van Dam A, Caffara M, Pinto HA, López-Hernández D, Blanar CA. Validity of the Diplostomoidea and Diplostomida (Digenea, Platyhelminthes) upheld in phylogenomic analysis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018;48:1043-1059.
  1. Bielecki A, Cichocka MJ, Jeleń I, Świątek P, Adamiak-Brud Ż. A checklist of leech species from Poland. Wiad. Parazytol. 2011;57(1): 11-20.
  2. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW. Parasitology meets ecology its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol. 1997;83:575-583.
  3. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547-1549.
  4. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012 ;61(3):539-42.
  5. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods. 2012;9, 772.
  6. Rambaut A. FigTree v1.4.4. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author. 2009. Website http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
  7. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler AP. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biol. 2006;55:595-609.
  8. Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG. Delimiting species using single-locus data and the generalized mixed Yule coalescent (GMYC) approach: a revised method and evaluation on simulated datasets. Systematic Biol. 2013;62:707-724.
  9. Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 10;10(4):e1003537.
  10. Zhatkanbaeva D. Leeches of Korgalzhyn lakes – second intermediate hosts for Strigeidae trematodes. In: Virbicikas IB, editors. Issues of parasitology of water invertebrates. Vilnius: Institute of Zoology of Latvia SSR; 1980. p. 40-41. (in Russian)
  11. Zhatkanbaeva D, Akhmetova B. Leeches of Korgalzhyn lakes and their importance in circulation of strigeids. Parasites as Components of Water and Ground Biocenoses of Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata: Publishing House Nauka; 1981. p. 78-83. (in Russian)
  12. Sudarikov VE, Karmanova EM, Bakhmet’eva TL. Issues of taxonomical composition of metacercariae of strigeid trematodes from leeches of Volga river. Tr. Astrakh. Gos. Zapovednika. 1962;6:197-202. (in Russian)
  13. Rajshite DI. Some data about infection of freshwater leeches of estuaries of Volga and Niemen rivers by metacercariae. Problemy Parazitologii. 1969;1:169 -199. (in Russian)
  14. Szidat L. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Holostomiden. III. Über zwei Tetracotylen aus Hirudiniden und ihre Weitereentwicklung in Enten zu Cotylurus cornutus Rud. und Apatemon gracilis Rud. Zool. Anz. 1929;86:133-149.
  15. Timon-David J. Sur la presence en Camarque et le development experimental de Cotylurus cornutus (Rud.) (Trematode, Strigeidae). Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Marseille. 1943;3:17-21.
  16. Szidat L. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Holostomiden. Die Cercariae des Entenparasiten Apatemon(Strigea)gracilis Rud. und Ihre Entwicklung im Blutgewässystem des Zwischenwirtes (Herpobdella atomaria Car.). Z Parasitenkd. 1931;3:160-172.
  17. Zajíček D. Experimental infection of domestic birds by Cotylurus strigeoides Dubois, 1958 (Trematoda: Strigeidae). Folia Parasitol. 1971;18:113-118.
  18. Zazornova OP. Study on life cycle of Cotylurus hebraicus Dubois, 1934 (Trematoda, Strigeidae). Trudy GELAN 1987;35:31-37. (in Russian)
  19. Zazornova OP. A new trematode species Cotylurus szidati n.sp. (family Strigeidae) with comments on taxonomy of the genus Cotylurus. Trudy GELAN. 1991;38:32-43. (in Russian)
  20. Zazornova OP. To morphological identification larval forms of the trematodes of genus Cotylurus. Trudy GELAN. 1993;39:39-44. (in Russian)
  21. Rząd I, Dzika E, Zalewski K, Śmietana P, Busse P. Geographic and ecologic aspects of the community structure of trematodes of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in northern Poland and the Czech Republic. J. Wildl. Dis. 2020;56:576-587.
  22. Hernández-Mena DI, García-Prieto L, García-Varela M. Morphological and molecular differentiation of Parastrigea (Trematoda: Strigeidae) from Mexico, with the description of a new species. Parasitol Int. 2014;63(2):315-323.
  23. Sudarikov VE. Trematodes of the fauna of the USSR. Strigeids. Moskva: Izdatielstvo Nauka; 1984. p. 168.
  24. Sitko J, Faltỳnkova A, Scholz T. 2006. Checklist of the trematodes (Digenea) of birds of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Praha, Academia, p. 111.
  25. Negm-Eldin M, Davies RW. Morphology and life cycle of Apatemon hypseleotris species novum from Australia including metacercariae viability and excystment. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2002 Jul;109(7):306-14.
  26. Palmieri JR, Krishnasamy M, Sullivan JT. Strigeoid trematodes of Malaysia with descriptions of a new genus and three new species. J. Helminthol. 1979;53: 51-63.
  27. Lutz A. Notas sobre Dicranocercarias brazileiras. Memo´rias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1933;27:349-375.
  28. Stunkard HW, Willey CH, Rabinowitz Y. Cercaria burti Miller, 1923, a larval stage of Apatemon gracilis (Rudolphi, 1819) Szidat, 1928. Trans. Am. Micros. Soc. 1941;60:485-497.
  29. Dubois G. Les Strigeata (Trematoda) de la collection A. Lutz. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 1970;68:169-176.
  30. Davies D, Ostrowski de Núñez M. The life cycle of Australapatemon magnacetabulum (Digenea: Strigeidae) from nortwestern Argentina. J Parasitol. 2012;98:778-783.
  31. Hernández-Mena DI, García-Varela M, Pérez-Ponce de León G. Filling the gaps in the classification of the Digenea Carus, 1863: systematic position of the Proterodiplostomidae Dubois, 1936 within the superfamily Diplostomoidea Poirier, 1886, inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Parasitol. 2017;94:833-848.
  32. Dubois G, Rausch RL. Seconde contribution a l’etude des Strigeides (Trematoda) nord-americains. Bull. Soc. Neuchl. Sci. Nat. 1948;71:29-61.
  33. Dubois G, Rausch RL. A contribution to the study of North American Strigeids (Trematoda). Am Midl Nat. 1950;43:1-31.
  34. Dubois G. Nouvelle clé de détermination des groupes systématiques et des genres de Strigeida Poche (Trematoda). Rev Suisse Zool. 1951;58:639–691.
  35. Faltýnková A, Niewiadomska K, Santos MJ, Valtonen ET. Furcocercous cercariae (Trematoda) from freshwater snails in Central Finland. Acta Parasitol. 2007;52:310-317.
  36. Soldánová M, Kuris AM, Scholz T. Lafferty KD. The role of spatial and temporal heterogeneity and competition in structuring trematode communities in the great pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis (L.). J Parasitol. 2012;98:460-471.
  37. Drago FB, Lunaschi LI, Hinojosa-Saez AC, Gonzalez-Acuna D. First record of Australapatemon burti and Paramonostomum pseudalveatum (Digenea) from Anas georgica (Aves, Anseriformes) in Chile. Acta Parasitol. 2007;52:201-205.
  38. Hinojosa-Sáez A, Gonzalez-Acuna D, George-Nascimento M. Hosts specificity, prevalence and between-sites variation in metazoan parasites of Anas georgica Gmelin, 1789 (Aves: Anseriformes) in Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2009;82(3):337-345.
  39. Sítko J, Faltýnková A, Scholz T. Checklist of the Trematodes (Digenea) of Birds of the Czech and Slovak Republics, Academia Praha. 2006;111 pp.
  40. Goc M, Mokwa T. Birds. In: Przewoźniak M, editors. Construction of a waterway connecting the Vistula Lagoon with the Gdańsk Bay. Biuro Projekt. Wdroż. Ekol. PROEKO; 2012. p. 145-155. (in Polish).
  41. Yamaguti S. Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part I. Trematodes of birds, reptiles and mammals. Japanese Journal of Zoology 1933;5:1-134.
  42. Tkach VV, Littlewood DT, Olson PD, Kinsella JM, Świderski Z. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Microphalloidea Ward, 1901 (Trematoda: Digenea). Syst. Parasitol. 2003;56(1):1-15.
  43. Morgan JAT, Blair D. Nuclear rDNA ITS sequence variation in the trematode genus Echinostoma: an aid to establishing relationships within the 37-collar spine group. Parasitology 1995;111:609-615.
  44. Van der Auwera G, Chapelle S, de Wachter R. Structure of the large ribosomal subunit RNA of Phytophtora megasperma, and phylogeny of the oomycetes. FEBS Lett. 1994;338:133-136.
  45. Morgan JA, Blair D. Relative merits of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and mitochondrial CO1 and ND1 genes for distinguishing among Echinostoma species (Trematoda). Parasitology 1998;116:289-297.
  46. Bowles J, Blair D, McManus DP. Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;54(2):165-73.
  47. Mira O, Kuris AM, Torchin ME, Hechinger RF, Dunham EJ, Chiba S. Molecular genetic analyses reveal cryptic species of trematodes in the intertidal gastropod, Batillaria cumingi (Crosse). Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:793-801.

Tables

Table 1. Parasitological factors of leeches infection

Localization

Leech species

No. of necropsied/infected leeches [ind.]

Tetracotyle prevalence [%]

Tetracotyle infection intensity (min-max; mean) [ind.]

Recorded Strigeidae genus

(no. of infected leeches/no. of leeches with mixed invasions)

Gdańsk Pomerania

Haemopis sanguisuga

66 / 51

77.3

1-235; 23.1

Australapatemon sp. (51/5)*

Cotylurus sp. (5/5)*

Lower Silesia

Erpobdella octoculata

13 / 3

23.1

1-3; 2.0

Australapatemon sp. (2)

Cotylurus sp. (1)

Haemopis sanguisuga

37 / 8

21.6

1-15; 7.0

Australapatemon sp. (8/2)*

Cotylurus sp. (2/2)*

Total

50 / 11

22.0

1-15; 5.6

Australapatemon sp. (10/2)*

Cotylurus sp. (3/2)*

Subcarpathia province

Glossiphonia complanata

Haemopis sanguisuga

Theromyzon tessulatum

8 / 0

13 / 0

16 / 0

-

-

-

Total

47 / 0

-

-

-

TOTAL

Erpobdella octoculata

13 / 3

23.1

1-3; 2,0

Australapatemon sp. (2)

Cotylurus sp. (1)

Glossiphonia complanata

8 / 0

-

-

-

Haemopis sanguisuga

116 / 59

50.9

1-235; 20.8

Australapatemon sp. (59/8)*

Cotylurus sp. (8/7)*

Theromyzon tessulatum

16 / 0

-

-

-

TOTAL

153 / 62

40.5

1-235; 19.9

Australapatemon sp. (61/8)*

Cotylurus sp. (9/8)*

* mixed invasions of Australapatemon sp. and Cotylurus sp. were detected