Microglia depletion by administration of a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor antagonist exacerbates inflammation-induced fatigue in mice

doi:10.21203/rs.2.18550/v1

Download PDF

Research

Microglia depletion by administration of a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor antagonist exacerbates inflammation-induced fatigue in mice

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.18550/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 31 May, 2020

Read the published version in Journal of Neuroinflammation →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Production of inflammatory mediators by activated microglial cells in the central nervous system is commonly considered to be responsible for the development of symptoms of depression including fatigue and lack of energy (anergia) in response to systemic inflammation.

Methods: In order to directly test the validity of this hypothesis, male C57BL/6 mice were treated orally with PLX5622, a specific antagonist of colony stimulating factor receptor to eliminate microglia before administration of a fatigue-inducing dose of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) according to a 2 (PLX5622 versus control diet) x 2 (LPS x control) factorial design. Fatigue was measured by decreased wheel running activity.

Results: Chronic administration of PLX5622 eliminated microglia and peripheral tissue macrophages. However, it did not abrogate the inducible expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the brain in response to LPS. Instead PLX5622 increased IL-6 and abrogated IL-10 response to LPS. PLX5622 had only moderate effects on the liver inflammatory response to LPS. In accordance with these neuroimmune effects, PLX5622-treated mice responded to LPS with the same level of decreased locomotor activity in a new environment as mice given the control diet. Further, PLX5622-treated mice displayed a prolonged decrease in running wheel activity. In addition, PLX5622-treated mice were less active in running wheels than mice given the control diet even in baseline conditions.

Conclusions: These findings reveal a role for microglia in the regulation of immune-to-brain signaling that is different from the one usually ascribed to it and call for a re-evaluation of the importance of microglia in the brain response to physical exercise.

Neurobiology of Disease

Lipopolysaccharide

Inflammation

Microglia

CSF-1 receptor antagonism

PLX5622

Running wheel activity

Fatigue

Anergia

Mouse

Highly convergent clinical and preclinical findings point to an involvement of the innate immune system in major depressive disorder(1). In the general population, depression is associated with elevated levels of biomarkers of inflammation(2–5). Longitudinal studies of patients treated with repeated doses of interferon-alpha for chemotherapy-resistant cancer or hepatitis virus C infection reveal that the affective-cognitive symptoms of depression emerge gradually from inflammation-induced symptoms of sickness characterized by fatigue, reduced appetite and sleep disorders(6, 7). This has been confirmed in murine models of acute and chronic inflammation-induced depression-like behavior(8, 9) as well as in human studies of endotoxin- or typhoid vaccine-induced changes in mood(10–12). In addition, brain imaging studies show that the cortical and subcortical brain structures that are sensitive to inflammation are strikingly similar to those brain areas that are implicated in the mood, motivation, and cognitive deficits of patients with major depressive disorder(13, 14). Taken all together, these findings point to the possibility that inflammation plays a role in at least some subtypes of depression(15).

The exact subtypes of depression in which inflammation could play a role are not yet fully elucidated. Epidemiological studies carried out in the general population reveal that inflammation is more likely to be associated with somatic/neurovegetative symptoms of depression than with cognitive and affective symptoms(16–20). The most prominent symptoms associated with inflammation are represented by sleep disturbances, fatigue and loss of energy (anergia), and reduced motivation. The observation that the relationship between inflammation and depression is mainly driven by somatic symptoms has been confirmed in psychiatric populations(20) as well as in individuals at risk for depression because of bereavement(21) or HIV infection(22).

Experimental studies in animal models of inflammation confirm that activation of the innate immune system reduces activity, propensity to exercise and motivation in effort tasks(23). The mechanisms for these effects involve propagation of inflammation from the periphery to the brain via multiple pathways including afferent nerves, circulating immune mediators interacting with endothelial cells and macrophages in parts of the brain devoid of a fully functional blood-brain barrier, active transport of immune-derived molecules via the blood-brain barrier and, in some cases, trafficking of peripheral immune cells into the brain(9, 24–26). This results in the activation of brain microglia and the local production of inflammatory cytokines which, by acting directly or indirectly on neurons, modify brain functions.

The key role of brain microglia in the development of inflammation-induced behavioral alterations has been demonstrated by various approaches mainly aiming at counteracting the production and action of inflammatory cytokines(27) or at down-regulating microglia activation using minocycline(28, 29). More recently, more targeted approaches have been proposed to eliminate microglia using genetic or pharmacological tools(30). Based on the observation that the development and survival of microglia critically depends on colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling(31), CSF-1R antagonists have been successfully developed and are now commonly used to eliminate microglia. Continuous administration of these molecules to mice via their food results in a gradual depletion of Iba-1 and CD68 positive microglia in the brain within a few days of treatment, which persists until cessation of treatment and is then followed by repopulation(30). The objective of the present study was to determine whether microglia activation plays a critical role in the fatigue and lack of energy induced by systemic administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to mice. For this purpose, we used the brain penetrant CSF-1R antagonist PLX-5622(32, 33). Despite the fact that chronic administration of PLX5622 eliminated tissue macrophages and microglia, mice treated with this compound still displayed depressed locomotor activity in response to LPS but engaged in less wheel running activity and took longer to recover from LPS-induced decrease in wheel running activity.

Mice

Male C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Labs) started being fed the control or PLX5622 diet at 10 weeks of age. They were maintained in the animal facility at 24°C and 50% humidity with a 12-h light:dark cycle and food and water ad libitum.

Treatments

PLX5622 was provided by Plexxikon Inc. (Berkeley, CA). It was formulated in standard AIN-76A rodent chow at a concentration of 1,200 mg/kg (Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ) and provided ad libitum. Control mice were given standard AIN-76A rodent chow. LPS (serotype O127:B8; Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO) was prepared in a solution of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of 50 mg/ml and injected intraperitoneally at the dose of 0.5 mg/kg. Control mice received an equivalent volume of PBS.

Behavioral testing

Mice were single housed with wireless low-profile running wheels (Med Associates, Fairfax, VT) to measure voluntary wheel running, which was quantified as total number of rotations during the night. Running wheels were provided to mice for 10-12 days prior to the initial LPS or PBS treatment. Locomotor activity in a new environment was measured for 5 min after mice were individually placed in an empty rectangular arena (18.4 x 29.2 cm). Activity was recorded by video camera and distance traveled was quantified using Noldus Ethovision XT Software (Noldus Information Technology, Leesberg, VA).

Experimental design

The experiment was organized according to a 2 (PLX5622 diet vs. control diet) x 2 (LPS vs. PBS) factorial design with 6 mice per group. The PLX5622 diet or the control diet was administered during the entire duration of the experiment. Mice were group housed with their assigned experimental diet for 12 days before they were single housed and provided with running wheels for the rest of the experiment. LPS or PBS was administered 1 month after the start of experimental diets. Locomotor activity in a new cage was measured 3 h after LPS or PBS treatment and voluntary wheel running was assessed for 5 days after.

Just over a week later, mice were submitted to a cross-over treatment so that mice that had received PBS were given LPS and vice versa. They were euthanized for tissue collection 6 h later to assess the effects of PLX5622 on the inflammatory response to LPS.

Tissue processing

Mice were euthanized by exposure to CO₂. Livers and brains were collected after intracardiac perfusion of PBS, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80°C until analyzed. RNA was extracted using E.Z.N.A. Total RNA Isolation kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA). RNA was reverse transcribed using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and analyzed by real-time PCR using TaqMan Gene expression assays. GADPH was used as a house keeping gene. Primers are listed in Table 1.

PLX5622 eliminates microglia in the brain but does not attenuate the brain inflammatory response to LPS

The extent of microglia depletion was quantified by the expression of CX3CR1 and CD11b mRNA. In accordance with previous reports, PLX5622 abrogated the expression of these microglial markers in the brain (Fig. 1A, Table 2). Peripheral macrophages were also depleted by PLX5622 in the liver, as measured by the gene expression of CSF-1R and Cd11b (Fig. 1B, Table 2).

As expected, LPS increased the gene expression of IL-1b, TNF, IL-6 and the type I interferon responsive gene Oas1a in the brain and liver (Fig. 1C & D). LPS also increased the gene expression of IL-10 in the brain and liver. PLX5622 did not alter the brain inflammatory response to LPS with the exception of IL-6 mRNA which was more highly expressed in the brains of PLX5622-treated mice compared to the brains of control mice in response to LPS, and IL-10 mRNA which was no longer increased by LPS in the brains of PLX5622 mice (Fig. 1C). In the liver, PLX5622 attenuated the TNF, IL-10 and Oas1a response to LPS but had no significant effect on the response of other cytokines to LPS (Fig. 1D).

PLX5622 does not block the fatigue inducing effects of LPS

Statistics on the effects of PLX5622 and LPS on body weight and behavior are summarized in Table 3. LPS administration induced body weight loss (24 h vs. baseline, p<0.01) and decreased locomotor activity in a new environment 3 h after treatment (Fig. 2A & B). These effects were not modified by PLX5622. During the week preceding LPS treatment, mice fed the diet supplemented with PLX5622 ran on average 20% less than mice fed the control diet (p=0.001) and responded to LPS with a prolonged suppression of voluntary wheel running that lasted 3 days (PLX5622 x LPS interaction: p<0.05 for day 2 & 3) instead of only 1 day for the mice receiving the control diet (LPS effect on day 1: p<0.001) (Fig. 2C).

The present results show that despite its ability to deplete microglia and peripheral macrophages chronic oral administration of PLX5622 had very limited effects on the peripheral and central inflammatory response to LPS. Therefore, it is not surprising that this treatment was unable to abrogate the decrease in locomotor activity and voluntary wheel running that developed in response to LPS. These findings indicate that the fatigue inducing effects of systemic inflammation are not primarily mediated by microglial activation in PLX5622-treated mice.

As already reported in previous studies on CSF-1 receptor antagonism(30, 31, 33), administration of the CSF-1 receptor antagonist PLX5622 for 4 weeks resulted in the near complete elimination of microglia in the central nervous system and a significant depletion of macrophages in the spleen and liver. At the periphery, PLX5622 had only moderate effects on the LPS-induced increase in gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the spleen and liver. This is probably due to the fact that CSF-1R antagonism specifically depletes tissue macrophages but does not affect pro-inflammatory monocytes recruited from the bone marrow, dendritic cells, or neutrophils which can all contribute to the peripheral inflammatory response(34). In the brain, elimination of microglia by PLX5622 should have attenuated the neuroinflammation induced by LPS and its behavioral consequences. In accordance with this prediction, there are already several publications showing that depletion of microglia by PLX5622 protects from neuroinflammation(35–38) and prevents behavioral alterations in response to cranial irradiation(38), repeated social defeat(39), partial sciatic nerve ligation(40) and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis(37). In addition, antibody-mediated neutralization of peripheral macrophage CSF-1R was reported to block the development of sickness behavior measured by reduced locomotor activity and body weight loss in response to CD40 activation, a model of autoimmune disease(41). In contrast with these positive findings, a number of studies reveal that microglial depletion is not always neuroprotective. In mice infected with prions, administration of PLX5622 accelerated disease progression(42). In the same manner, PLX5622 increased viral load and enhanced mortality in a number of murine models of viral infection(43–45). This protective role of microglia was also apparent in the progression of neurodegeneration in APP-PS1 transgenic mice(46), the extent of excitotoxic injury in a model of brain injury induced by cerebral ischaemia(47) and the dopaminergic neurotoxicity of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrine (MPTP)(48).

The problem with most of the studies described above is that they are often descriptive and do not provide a clear explanation of what the elimination of microglia by CSF-1 receptor antagonists actually accomplishes. In the first study to show that CSF1 receptor antagonism eliminates microglia in a reversible way, mice were treated with a low dose of LPS (0.25 mg/kg) after only 7 days of the CSF-1R antagonist PLX3397, and brains were collected 6 h after LPS but without any intracardiac perfusion of PBS or saline to eliminate residual blood(31). While this study showed that PLX3397 attenuated IL-1β and reversed TNF mRNA expression in response to LPS, it had only limited effects on other inflammatory markers, with no effect on IL-6 mRNA expression in response to LPS. In a model of Parkinson’s disease caused by administration of MPTP, a 21-day administration of PLX3397 increased the gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in response to MPTP in the striatum of mice(48). Flow cytometry analysis of chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines in astrocytes from the substantia nigra and striatum revealed that PLX5622 significantly increased the IL-6 and TNF response to MPTP. These findings can be interpreted to suggest that microglia cells down regulate the astrocytic response to inflammatory insults. There is already evidence that astrocytes from mice treated chronically with the CSF1 receptor antagonist PLX3397 to deplete microglia still respond to LPS in vivo by developing a reactive A1 phenotype(49). This is probably facilitated by the lack of IL-10 from microglial origin as this anti-inflammatory cytokine normally lowers the proinflammatory profile of LPS-activated astrocytes(50).

The possibility that reactive A1 astrocytes induced by LPS take over in the absence of microglia is consistent with the observation that in our study brain IL-6, a cytokine mainly produced by astrocytes during neuroinflammation(51), was the only cytokine of which the gene expression in response to LPS was enhanced by PLX5622. Of note, there is a consistent literature on the existence of a positive relationship between IL-6 and fatigue(52) with evidence of improvement in fatigue scores in response to anti-IL-6 agents(53). Another candidate cytokine for fatigue is type I interferon(7). As LPS induces type I interferons as well as classical proinflammatory cytokines, we assessed this possibility by measuring the expression of Oas1a, a type I interferon responsive gene. As expected, LPS increased the gene expression of Oas1a at the periphery and in the brain. However, PLX5622 attenuated this effect in the liver but did not modify it in the brain.

Another mechanism for the lack of attenuation of neuroinflammation by PLX5622 could be an enhanced trafficking of immune cells into the brain of microglia depleted mice. However, this is unlikely to account for the present results as PLX3397 treatment did not compromise the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, based on blue Evans coloration exclusion(31). In addition, in situations in which there was evidence of increased infiltration of lymphocytes in the brain of microglia-depleted mice, genetic elimination of lymphocytes did not modify the increased sensitivity of microglia depleted mice to neurodegeneration(48).

No abnormalities at baseline in spontaneous behavior, motor coordination, locomotor activity or learning and memory have been described in mice treated with CSF-1R antagonists(30, 31). However, there has been no attempt to assess the effect of microglial elimination on the ability of mice to engage in strenuous exercise, as measured by running wheel activity or by treadmill running. Our results show that PLX5622 decreased the amount of voluntary wheel running at baseline by about 20%. It is possible to interpret this finding by what is already known concerning the involvement of microglia in the beneficial effects of physical exercise. In particular, microglial activation within the neurogenic niche has been shown to mediate the beneficial effects of running wheel activity on hippocampal neurogenesis in the adult or aged mouse brain(54, 55). In addition, wheel running has been reported to induce microglia proliferation in the adult murine cortex, which could play a role in the positive effects of physical exercise on neurological health(56, 57). Our observation of a significant decrease in voluntary wheel running activity in microglia depleted mice is consistent with this hypothesis.

In conclusion, the results of the present study cast doubt on an exclusive role of microglia activation in the fatigue inducing effects of systemic inflammation and call for a re-evaluation of the importance of microglia in the brain response to physical exercise.

Cd11b

Cluster of differentiation 11b

CSF-1

Colony stimulating factor 1

CSF-1R

Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor

CX3CR1

CX3C chemokine receptor 1

E.Z.N.A.

Registered commercial name

IL-1β

Interleukin-1beta

IL-6

Interleukin-6

IL-10

Interleukin-10

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

mRNA

Messenger ribonucleic acid

Oas1a

2’-5’-oligoadenylate synthase 1A

PBS

Phosphate-buffered saline

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Dantzer R, Capuron L. Inflammation-Associated Depression: Evidence, Mechanisms and Implications. Geyer M, Ellenbroek B, Marsden C, Barnes T, editors. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. 356 p.
Enache D, Pariante CM, Mondelli V. Markers of central inflammation in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining cerebrospinal fluid, positron emission tomography and post-mortem brain tissue. Brain Behav Immun. 2019.
Kohler CA, Freitas TH, Stubbs B, Maes M, Solmi M, Veronese N, et al. Peripheral Alterations in Cytokine and Chemokine Levels After Antidepressant Drug Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(5):4195-206.
Valkanova V, Ebmeier KP, Allan CL. CRP, IL-6 and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Affect Disord. 2013;150(3):736-44.
Hiles SA, Baker AL, de Malmanche T, Attia J. A meta-analysis of differences in IL-6 and IL-10 between people with and without depression: exploring the causes of heterogeneity. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(7):1180-8.
Udina M, Moreno-Espana J, Capuron L, Navines R, Farre M, Vieta E, et al. Cytokine-induced depression: current status and novel targets for depression therapy. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13(6):1066-74.
Raison CL, Demetrashvili M, Capuron L, Miller AH. Neuropsychiatric adverse effects of interferon-alpha: recognition and management. CNS Drugs. 2005;19(2):105-23.
Remus JL, Dantzer R. Inflammation Models of Depression in Rodents: Relevance to Psychotropic Drug Discovery. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19(9).
Dantzer R, O'Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(1):46-56.
Brydon L, Harrison NA, Walker C, Steptoe A, Critchley HD. Peripheral inflammation is associated with altered substantia nigra activity and psychomotor slowing in humans. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(11):1022-9.
Eisenberger NI, Inagaki TK, Mashal NM, Irwin MR. Inflammation and social experience: an inflammatory challenge induces feelings of social disconnection in addition to depressed mood. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24(4):558-63.
Reichenberg A, Yirmiya R, Schuld A, Kraus T, Haack M, Morag A, et al. Cytokine-associated emotional and cognitive disturbances in humans. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(5):445-52.
Felger JC, Treadway MT. Inflammation Effects on Motivation and Motor Activity: Role of Dopamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42(1):216-41.
Savitz J, Harrison NA. Interoception and Inflammation in Psychiatric Disorders. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018;3(6):514-24.
Raison CL, Miller AH. Do cytokines really sing the blues? Cerebrum. 2013;2013:10.
Jokela M, Virtanen M, Batty GD, Kivimaki M. Inflammation and Specific Symptoms of Depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(1):87-8.
White J, Kivimaki M, Jokela M, Batty GD. Association of inflammation with specific symptoms of depression in a general population of older people: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;61:27-30.
Wium-Andersen MK, Orsted DD, Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG. Elevated C-reactive protein levels, psychological distress, and depression in 73, 131 individuals. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(2):176-84.
Chu AL, Stochl J, Lewis G, Zammit S, Jones PB, Khandaker GM. Longitudinal association between inflammatory markers and specific symptoms of depression in a prospective birth cohort. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;76:74-81.
Duivis HE, Vogelzangs N, Kupper N, de Jonge P, Penninx BW. Differential association of somatic and cognitive symptoms of depression and anxiety with inflammation: findings from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(9):1573-85.
Seiler A, Murdock KW, Fagundes CP. Impaired mental health and low-grade inflammation among fatigued bereaved individuals. J Psychosom Res. 2018;112:40-6.
Norcini Pala A, Steca P, Bagrodia R, Helpman L, Colangeli V, Viale P, et al. Subtypes of depressive symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers: An exploratory study on a sample of HIV-positive patients. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;56:105-13.
Vichaya EG, Laumet G, Christian DL, Grossberg AJ, Estrada DJ, Heijnen CJ, et al. Motivational changes that develop in a mouse model of inflammation-induced depression are independent of indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(2):364-71.
Quan N, Banks WA. Brain-immune communication pathways. Brain Behav Immun. 2007;21(6):727-35.
D'Mello C, Swain MG. Immune-to-Brain Communication Pathways in Inflammation-Associated Sickness and Depression. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2017;31:73-94.
Ramirez K, Fornaguera-Trias J, Sheridan JF. Stress-Induced Microglia Activation and Monocyte Trafficking to the Brain Underlie the Development of Anxiety and Depression. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2017;31:155-72.
Dantzer R. Cytokine, sickness behavior, and depression. Neurol Clin. 2006;24(3):441-60.
O'Connor JC, Lawson MA, Andre C, Moreau M, Lestage J, Castanon N, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced depressive-like behavior is mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activation in mice. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14(5):511-22.
Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne A, Hanke M, Himler J, Bailey MT, et al. Minocycline attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neuroinflammation, sickness behavior, and anhedonia. J Neuroinflammation. 2008;5:15.
Han J, Harris RA, Zhang XM. An updated assessment of microglia depletion: current concepts and future directions. Mol Brain. 2017;10(1):25.
Elmore MR, Najafi AR, Koike MA, Dagher NN, Spangenberg EE, Rice RA, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. 2014;82(2):380-97.
Acharya MM, Green KN, Allen BD, Najafi AR, Syage A, Minasyan H, et al. Elimination of microglia improves cognitive function following cranial irradiation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31545.
Weber MD, McKim DB, Niraula A, Witcher KG, Yin W, Sobol CG, et al. The Influence of Microglial Elimination and Repopulation on Stress Sensitization Induced by Repeated Social Defeat. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85(8):667-78.
Hume DA, MacDonald KP. Therapeutic applications of macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) and antagonists of CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling. Blood. 2012;119(8):1810-20.
Walter TJ, Crews FT. Microglial depletion alters the brain neuroimmune response to acute binge ethanol withdrawal. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):86.
Witcher KG, Bray CE, Dziabis JE, McKim DB, Benner BN, Rowe RK, et al. Traumatic brain injury-induced neuronal damage in the somatosensory cortex causes formation of rod-shaped microglia that promote astrogliosis and persistent neuroinflammation. Glia. 2018;66(12):2719-36.
Nissen JC, Thompson KK, West BL, Tsirka SE. Csf1R inhibition attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and promotes recovery. Exp Neurol. 2018;307:24-36.
Feng X, Jopson TD, Paladini MS, Liu S, West BL, Gupta N, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor blockade prevents fractionated whole-brain irradiation-induced memory deficits. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):215.
Lehmann ML, Weigel TK, Poffenberger CN, Herkenham M. The Behavioral Sequelae of Social Defeat Require Microglia and Are Driven by Oxidative Stress in Mice. J Neurosci. 2019;39(28):5594-605.
Lee S, Shi XQ, Fan A, West B, Zhang J. Targeting macrophage and microglia activation with colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor is an effective strategy to treat injury-triggered neuropathic pain. Mol Pain. 2018;14:1744806918764979.
Muller AF, Strauss L, Greter M, Gast H, Recher M, Becher B, et al. Neutralization of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor prevents sickness behavior syndrome by reprogramming inflammatory monocytes to produce IL-10. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:78-85.
Carroll JA, Race B, Williams K, Striebel J, Chesebro B. Microglia Are Critical in Host Defense against Prion Disease. J Virol. 2018;92(15).
Seitz S, Clarke P, Tyler KL. Pharmacologic Depletion of Microglia Increases Viral Load in the Brain and Enhances Mortality in Murine Models of Flavivirus-Induced Encephalitis. J Virol. 2018;92(16).
Sanchez JMS, DePaula-Silva AB, Doty DJ, Truong A, Libbey JE, Fujinami RS. Microglial cell depletion is fatal with low level picornavirus infection of the central nervous system. J Neurovirol. 2019;25(3):415-21.
Waltl I, Kaufer C, Gerhauser I, Chhatbar C, Ghita L, Kalinke U, et al. Microglia have a protective role in viral encephalitis-induced seizure development and hippocampal damage. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;74:186-204.
Unger MS, Schernthaner P, Marschallinger J, Mrowetz H, Aigner L. Microglia prevent peripheral immune cell invasion and promote an anti-inflammatory environment in the brain of APP-PS1 transgenic mice. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):274.
Szalay G, Martinecz B, Lenart N, Kornyei Z, Orsolits B, Judak L, et al. Microglia protect against brain injury and their selective elimination dysregulates neuronal network activity after stroke. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11499.
Yang X, Ren H, Wood K, Li M, Qiu S, Shi FD, et al. Depletion of microglia augments the dopaminergic neurotoxicity of MPTP. FASEB J. 2018;32(6):3336-45.
Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541(7638):481-7.
Norden DM, Fenn AM, Dugan A, Godbout JP. TGFbeta produced by IL-10 redirected astrocytes attenuates microglial activation. Glia. 2014;62(6):881-95.
Van Wagoner NJ, Benveniste EN. Interleukin-6 expression and regulation in astrocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;100(1-2):124-39.
Rohleder N, Aringer M, Boentert M. Role of interleukin-6 in stress, sleep, and fatigue. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1261:88-96.
Choy EHS, Calabrese LH. Neuroendocrine and neurophysiological effects of interleukin 6 in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(11):1885-95.
Villeda S, Wyss-Coray T. Microglia--a wrench in the running wheel? Neuron. 2008;59(4):527-9.
Vukovic J, Colditz MJ, Blackmore DG, Ruitenberg MJ, Bartlett PF. Microglia modulate hippocampal neural precursor activity in response to exercise and aging. J Neurosci. 2012;32(19):6435-43.
Ehninger D, Kempermann G. Regional effects of wheel running and environmental enrichment on cell genesis and microglia proliferation in the adult murine neocortex. Cereb Cortex. 2003;13(8):845-51.
Jensen S, Yong V. Microglial modulation as a mechanism behind the promotion of central nervous system well-being by physical exercise. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;5:188-201.

Table 1 – List of primers

Gene	Accession #	Foreword Sequence	Reverse Sequence
Gapdh	NM_008084	5’-GTGGAGTCATACTGGAACATGTAG-3’		5’-AATGGTGAAGGTCGGTGTG-3’
CSF-1R	NM_001037859	5’-TGTATGTCTGTCATGTCTCTGC-3’	5’-AGGTGTAGCTATTGCCTTCG-3’
CX3CR1	NM_009987	5’-TCCCTTCCCATCTGCTCA-3’	5’-CACAATGTCGCCCAAATACAG-3’
CD11b (Itgam)	NM_001082960	5’-CCACAGTTCACACTTCTTTCAG-3’	5’-TGTCCAGATTGAAGCCATGA-3’
IL-1b	NM_008361	5’-GACCTGTTCTTTGAAGTTGACG-3’	5’-CTCTTGTTGATGTGCTGCTG-3’
TNF	NM_013693	5’-AGACCCTCACACTCAGATCA-3’	5’-TCTTTGAGATCCATGCCGTTG-3’
IL-6	NM_031168	5’-CAAGTGCATCATCGTTGTTCA-3’	5’-GATACCACTCCCAACAGACC-3’
IL-10	NM_010548	5’-GTCATCGATTTCTCCCCTGTG-3	5’-ATGGCCTTGTAGACACCTTG-3’
OAS1a	NM_145211	5’-GATGAGGATGGCATAGATTCTGG-3’	5’-AGGAGGTGGAGTTTGATGTG-3’

Table 2 – Effects of PLX and LPS on gene expression of markers of microglia/macrophages and proinflammatory cytokines. F values (F(1,20)) from 2 (PLX diet vs. control diet) x 2 (LPS vs. control) ANOVA with 6 mice/group. NS = non-significant, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***p<0.001

Target molecule	PLX	LPS	PLX x LPS
Brain CX3CR1	F(1,20)=684***	F(1,20)=5.29*	F(1,20)=6.53*
Brain Cd11b	F(1,20)=333***	F(1,20)= 9.61**	F(1,20)=7.56*
Brain IL-1b	F(1,20)=1.43 NS	F(1,20)= 9.70**	F(1,20)=1.22 NS
Brain TNF	F(1,20)=0.75 NS	F(1,20)=21.1***	F(1,20)=0.95 NS
Brain IL-6	F(1,20)=0.30 NS	F(1,20)=7.56*	F(1,20)=4.55*
Brain IL-10	F(1,20)=1.10 NS	F(1.20)=3.79	F(1,20)=4.88*
Brain OAS1a	F(1,20)=0.29 NS	F(1,20)=14.7***	F(1,20)=0.31 NS
Liver CSF-1R	F(1,20)=23.9***	F(1,20)=12.3**	F(1,20)=4.95*
Liver Cd11b	F(1,20)=3.22 NS	F(1,20)=17.3***	F(1,20)=2.42 NS
Liver IL-1b	F(1,20)=0.41	F(1,20)=27.1***	F(1,20)=0.34
Liver TNF	F(1,20)=7.96**	F(1,20)=39.1***	F(1,20)=7.86*
Liver IL-6	F(1,20)=2.49 NS	F(1.20)=23.6***	F(1,20)=2.44 NS
Liver IL-10	F(1,20)=9.62**	F(1,20)=15.2***	F(1,20)=9.18**
Liver OAS1a	F(1,20)=4.15 NS	F(1.20)=28.9***	F(1.20)=4.53*

Table 3 – Effects of PLX on body weight, locomotor activity in a new cage and voluntary wheel running response to LPS. F values from 2 (PLX diet vs. control diet) x time ANOVA for body weight and voluntary wheel running before LPS treatment, from 2 (PLX diet vs. control diet) x 2 (LPS vs. control) ANOVA for locomotor activity in a new cage, and from 2 (PLX diet vs. control diet) x 2 (LPS vs. control) ANOVA with 6 mice/group with time as a repeated factor for body weight loss, and voluntary wheel running. NS non-significant, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***p<0.001

PLX

LPS

PLX x LPS

Time

PLX x time

LPS x time

PLX x LPS x time

Body weight

F(1,22)=

0.200 NS

F(6,132)=

3.85**

F(6,132)=

1.86 NS

LPS effect on body weight

F(1,20)=

0.342 NS

F(1,20)=

1.14 NS

F(1,20)=

1.31 NS

F(2,40)

65.2***

F(2,40)=

1.57 NS

F(2,40)=

31.0***

F(2,40)=

1.57 NS

LPS effect on activity

new cage

F(1,20)=

0.186 NS

F(1,20)=

1.36 NS

F(1,20)=

16.8***

Pre-LPS

wheel running

F(1,22)=

18.4***

F(6,132)=

44.3***

F(6,132)=

0.803 NS

LPS effect on wheel running

F(1,20)=

275***

F(1,20)=

7.45*

F(1,20)=

1.67 NS

F(5,100)=

4.24**

F(5,100)=

25.8***

F(5,100)=

7.90***

Availability of data and materials

The datasets collected and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

RD has received honoraria from Pfizer USA and from Danone Nutricia Research France for work that is not related to the present study. Al remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

Funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA193522 and R01 NS073939) and an MD Anderson Cancer Support Grant (P30 CA016672).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All protocols were approved by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Authors’ Contributions

EGV: conception, design of the work; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; drafting of the work and revised it.

FGB: acquisition and analysis of data

RD: conception, design of the work; drafting of the work and revised it

All authors have approved the submitted version and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author's own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Acknowledgements

We thank Plexxikon Inc. for the supply of PLX5622

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 31 May, 2020

Read the published version in Journal of Neuroinflammation →

Review #1 received at journal
02 Jan, 2020
Editorial decision: Major Revision
02 Jan, 2020
Review #2 received at journal
28 Dec, 2019
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
15 Dec, 2019
Reviewers invited by journal
10 Dec, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
10 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
05 Dec, 2019
First submitted to journal
04 Dec, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
04 Dec, 2019
Editor invited by journal
04 Dec, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Microglia depletion by administration of a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor antagonist exacerbates inflammation-induced fatigue in mice

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Animals and methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

References

Tables

Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1