One Year of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross Sectional Study on Teaching Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-923100/v1

Download PDF

Research

One Year of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross Sectional Study on Teaching Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-923100/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 01 Dec, 2021

Read the published version in Head & Face Medicine →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: The pandemic has challenged educational institutions to catalyze digitalization and rapidly develop online teaching formats. The aim of the study was to evaluate the teaching offer for oral and maxillofacial surgery at our university during the pandemic and to investigate the students’ perceptions of the current situation.

Methods: A 38-item questionnaire with five sections (demographic information, lectures, internships, e-learning, and pandemic-related solutions/effects) was created online. Most questions were answered on a 10-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating “fully agree/positive” and 10 indicating “totally disagree/negative.” The remaining questions were either answered with yes/no, percent value, or open-ended text responses. All 3^rd-5^th year dental students were invited to voluntarily participate and were sent an anonymous link by email.

Results: A total of 63.7% of the participants had no prior experience with online courses before the pandemic. The students stated that the change from face-to-face to online teaching worked very well in the last two semesters (mean = 2.73, standard deviation = 2.05). Overall, the pandemic had a rather positive influence on the acquisition of theoretical skills and a negative influence on the acquisition of practical skills (p < 0.0001). The evaluation showed that, compared to other dental clinics at our university, the department for oral and maxillofacial surgery was well prepared for the pandemic.

Conclusion: Digitalization of oral and maxillofacial surgery teaching in dental education is possible but depends on the institution’s preparatory work and technological possibilities. The students declared a high acceptance of digital learning formats and indicated an increased motivation to learn due to e-learning. The pandemic’s influence on the students’ education was rated ambivalent.

Head & Neck Surgery

COVID-19

dental education

digitalization

pandemic

survey

One year after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Europe, the disease has revealed a massive impact on all aspects of life. [1–3] Restrictions like curfews, quarantine, or closures of public places and educational institutions to control the rate of infections have been imposed. These restrictions have also a significant effect on academic teaching as it has been established in recent years. When face-to-face classes were temporarily impossible, teaching methods suddenly shifted toward online. Lectures and seminars were replaced by videos and Zoom lectures/seminars, and internships were canceled or replaced by other e-learning formats. Online teaching had to develop rapidly, and therefore the pandemic worked as a catalyzer for digitalization at universities. [4, 5] Teachers were often faced with major challenges, as faculties sometimes required digital conversion of teaching within a few days or weeks. [6] Some academic institutions were completely unprepared, while others had already done good preparatory work for online teaching.

At our university, the teaching of oral and maxillofacial surgery is spread over 2.5 years (3rd -5th year) and is divided into 4 series of lectures and 2 internships. To improve the quality of the teaching offer, new teaching methods and e-learning formats have been implemented for several years. For example, a blended learning concept has been applied to the main oral and maxillofacial surgery lecture. Students can prepare for and follow up on the lecture with the help of an e-learning program. Besides text elements, the e-learning program contains several surgical videos, photos, and a quiz for self-assessment. [7] Further, an e-learning format following the flipped classroom principle for the oral surgery internship has been introduced. An e-learning program containing the educational content with additional didactically prepared oral surgery videos has been developed. Here, students are called upon to prepare the learning content at home in order to apply the newly learned knowledge directly in the internship. This method has been confirmed to be effective in improving knowledge and competence among dental students. [8] In addition, students have confirmed their high satisfaction with the blended learning approaches. [7, 8]

The aim of the study was to evaluate the teaching offer for oral and maxillofacial surgery at our university during the pandemic and to investigate the students’ perceptions of the current situation.

Questionnaire design and distribution

A 38-item questionnaire was developed following a literature search on the current effects of COVID-19 on dental education. The survey consisted of five sections: demographic information, lectures, internships, e-learning, and the pandemic-related solutions/effects. Most questions were answered on a 10-point Likert-scale, with 1 indicating “fully agree/positive” and 10 indicating “totally disagree/negative.” The remaining questions were either answered with yes/no, percent value, or open-ended text responses (see supplementary material). Three professionals validated and approved the final questionnaire. The survey was created using Lime Survey, an online survey software (LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), and distributed with an anonymous link by email. The survey was accessible online for three weeks (April 15 to May 7, 2021).

Participants, consent, and ethical considerations

All 3rd -5th year dental students were invited via email by the faculty’s secretary to voluntarily participate in this cross-sectional study. The participants were informed that the collected data were to be used for the research and would be completely anonymous. Informed consent was obtained prior to starting the survey. All methods were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The local Ethics Commission approved the study (EK 151/21).

Statistics

The obtained data were arranged using MS Office Excel 2019® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA). The continuous variables were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD). Normal distribution was checked through a D’Agostino-Pearson normality test in the omnibus K2 variant. The unpaired t-test was used to compare the evaluated aspects. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Demographics

A total of 117 out of 149 students (78.5%) participated in this study. There were 15 dropouts due to incomplete questionnaire answers. Out of the 102 participants, 70 were female, 30 male and 2 were other. In terms of age, 6% were ≤ 21 years old, 66.7% were 22–25 years old and 27.3% were ≥ 26 years old. Out of the respondents, 17.5% were in their 3rd year, 37.1% were in their 4th year, and 45.4% were in their 5th year.

Lectures and internships

The students were asked about their participation in lectures and internships: 81.8 % participated ≥ 81%, 15.2% participated 61–80% and 3% participated only 41–60% in the online courses during the past year.

The cancelation rates are shown in Fig. 1. Regarding cancelation, most students stated that ≤ 25% of the courses were canceled. The course replacements are shown in Fig. 2.

Regarding the students’ opinions on the continuation of courses from the start of the pandemic, most students would have liked to continue the internships normally but not the face-to-face lectures, as shown in Fig. 3.

E-learning

Of the participants, 63.7% had no prior experience with online courses before the pandemic, 17.6% stated that they had prior experience, and 18.6% did not answer the question. The other results of the e-learning evaluation are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Evaluation of e-learning. All aspects were rated on a 10-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating “totally agree/positive” and 10 “totally disagree/negative”.
	Mean Score	Standard deviation
Thanks to the extensive digital range of oral and maxillofacial surgery online (Emedia Skills Lab) developed in recent years, the MKG was well prepared for the pandemic.	2.39	2.27
In my opinion, the effectiveness of knowledge transfer through online events has improved significantly compared to face-to-face events.	3.88	2.61
In the last two semesters there were often technical problems with online teaching.	6.47	3.02
The change from face-to-face to online teaching worked very well in the last two semesters.	2.73	2.05

Pandemic-related solutions/effects

The results of the evaluation of the pandemic- related solutions and effects are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Evaluation of pandemic-related solutions and effects. All aspects were rated on a 10-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating “totally agree/positive” and 10 indicating “totally disagree/negative”.
	Mean Score	Standard deviation
The organization of the switch from face-to-face to online teaching was very good.	2.71	2.09
How has the pandemic affected your student education overall?	5.94	2.33
The new digital learning conditions are very stressful for me.	7.57	2.53
I am concerned that I will not pass some courses because of the pandemic conditions.	5	3.34
I am concerned that my exam grades will change due to the pandemic conditions.	6.86	2.24
I would like to keep the digital courses (e-learning programs and digital lectures) in the future.	2.67	2.47
In the future, I prefer to further reduce face-to-face events and replace them with online courses.	4.48	2.96
The online courses motivated me to learn more.	3.67	2.64
The pandemic made it easier for me to focus on my studies because there was less distraction from leisure activities.	6.35	3.18

Most students stated that the new digital teaching formats were not stressful for them (mean = 7.57, SD = 2.53). Students declaring the opposite stated in the open-ended question that they were stressed because they had difficulties concentrating at home and that there was a lack of time in hybrid courses when switching from online to face-to-face classes.

The assessment of the students with regard to the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and practical skills showed that the effect on theoretical knowledge gain tended to be a positive while the effect on practical skills was negative (see Fig. 4). The difference was significant (p < 0.0001).

In terms of which digital teaching format the participants preferred, multiple answers were possible. 43.16% of the students stated that they preferred live lectures, 70.53% preferred recorded lectures and 48.42% preferred e-learning programs.

Further, the students highlighted in the open-ended responses that, compared to other dental clinics at our university, the department for oral- and maxillofacial surgery was well prepared for the pandemic. The organization of the different courses was very well structured, and the switch from face-to-face to online teaching was successful.

The pandemic has forced universities to completely digitalize existing teaching formats. Some academic institutions were completely unprepared, while others had already prepared well for online teaching. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the teaching offer for oral and maxillofacial surgery at our university during the pandemic and to investigate the students’ perceptions of the current situation.

Overall, the participants evaluated the teaching offer for oral and maxillofacial surgery to be fairly good. The students highlighted that, compared to other dental clinics at our university, the department for oral- and maxillofacial surgery was well prepared for the pandemic. The participants confirmed that the previously developed blended learning concepts contributed to the good preparation, and the change from face-to-face to online teaching worked very well. During the first pandemic year, only minor parts of the lectures and the internships were canceled, and, in the case of cancelation, it was possible to replace the courses.

Most students stated that they would have liked to have continued their internships normally from the start, despite the risk of infection. This confirms the results of a study by Harries et al., in which participants stated that they would like to return to clinical rotations regardless of the risk of infection. [9] In relation to the lectures, however, the students rated face-to-face attendance to the contrary and stated that they would like to keep the digital courses (e-learning programs and digital lectures) in future. Overall, the participants confirmed that the online courses motivated them to study more. This confirms the results of other studies indicating high motivation due to e-learning. [10, 11, 12] Although most students indicated that they would prefer to further reduce face-to-face events and replace them with online courses, a minority negated this, as they preferred face-to-face teaching.

From a technical point of view, the changeover went well at our institution, as there were rarely technical problems with the online events. Although most students had no prior experience with online courses, they successfully participated in most of the online events. The participants in this study stated that the digitalization of dental education itself was not a stressful factor for them. Rather the opposite, as the students indicated that the effectivity of knowledge gain increased with online teaching compared to face-to-face teaching. However, it is clear that this aspect depends on the faculty’s readiness and expertise to employ technology to facilitate the learning process. In a study by Khalil et al., there were several technical problems, including poor internet connectivity or educators’ deficient basic computer skills, which caused stress for the students as the learning goals could not be achieved. [13]

In addition, several studies have indicated that, apart from digitalization, the pandemic itself has been stressful for dental students. [14, 15, 16] For example, Agius et al. reported that the pandemic caused a fear of losing manual dexterity skills and influenced examinations. [14] However, the participants of our study stated that most students were not concerned that the marks of their final examination might be influenced by the pandemic. The responses to the concerns that single courses might not be passed due to the pandemic were rather ambivalent. Regarding the overall impact of the pandemic on the students’ education, the participants also had very divergent attitudes. While some rated the influence positively, others stated that the influence was rather negative. These differences can have many different causes. It certainly depends on the type of learner, the stage of training, and social circumstances. In a study by Klaassen et al., similar results were found, as about half of their participants were extremely concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on their education while the other half worried less. [15] The statement, that the pandemic made it easier for the students to focus on their studies as there was less distraction from leisure activities was negated in the present study.

In this study, students stated that the pandemic had a somewhat positive influence on the acquisition of theoretical skills and a somewhat negative influence on the acquisition of practical skills. In a practical profession like dentistry, the acquisition of practical skills is extremely important. Possible solutions to overcome the lack of practical training could be virtual simulation technologies or computer-based models of real-life processes. The advantage of such methods is having a controlled setting in a safe environment and the exclusion of risk to patients. [13, 17] Despite these digital solutions, a resumption of the courses needs to be considered under appropriate hygiene conditions. [18, 19]

The major limitation of this study is that the cross-sectional survey took place only at a single institution. Further studies including multiple institutions are needed, although the comparison might be difficult as the stage of digitalization is different at each university.

Digitalization of teaching oral and maxillofacial surgery in dental education is possible but depends on the institutions preparatory work and technological possibilities. Thanks to the comprehensive blended learning offer created beforehand, our department was well prepared for the pandemic. In future, cooperation between universities should increase so that more institutes can benefit from the digitalization that has taken place at single institutions. Students declared a high acceptance of the digital learning formats and indicated an increased motivation to learn due to the e-learning materials. The pandemic influence on the students’ education was rated ambivalent.

Ethical approval and consent to participate: All the participants voluntarily participated in this study and provided written informed consent. The Ethics-Commission of the Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University approved this study (EK 151/21).

Consent for publication: Not applicable in general.

Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding: The authors did not obtain funding for the conduction and/or presentation of the study. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Authors’ contributions:

AB designed the study model, analyzed and interpreted the data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. FP and PW designed the study model and analysed and interpreted the data. KK and MH analyzed and interpreted the data. ML and FH designed the study model, analyzed and interpreted the data. AM designed the study model, analysed and interpreted the data and contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements: We thank all students who voluntarily participated in this study.

Authors’ information:

Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany: Anna Bock, Florian Peters, Philipp Winnand, Kristian Kniha, Marius Heitzer, Frank Hölzle, Ali Modabber

Audiovisual Media Center, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany: Martin Lemos

Johnson B. PM address to the nation on coronavirus: 23 Mar 2020. [Online] GOV.UK. Available: https://www. gov. uk/ government/speeches/ pm- address- to- the- nation- on- coronavirus- 23- march- 2020 [Accessed 29th May 2020].
Hancock M. Controlling the spread of COVID-19: Health Secretary’s statement to Parliament. [Online] GOV.UK. Available: https://www. gov. uk/ government/ speeches/ controlling- the- spread- of- covid- 19-health- secretarys- statement- to- parliament [Accessed 31 May 2020].
Stevens S, Pritchard A. Letter to chief executives of all NHS trusts and foundation trusts, CCG accountable officers, GP practices and primary care networks, and providers of community health services.[Online] NHS England and NHS Improvement. Available: https://www. england. nhs. uk/ coronavirus/ wp- content/ uploads/ sites/ 52/2020/ 03/ urgent- next- steps- on- nhs- response- to- covid- 19- lettersimon- stevens. pdf [Accessed 29 May 2020].
Molwitz I, Othman A, Brendlin A, Afat S, Barkhausen J, Reinartz SD. Digitale Lehre mit, durch und nach COVID-19. Radiologe. 2021;61(1):64–6. doi:10.1007/s00117-020-00794-z.
Torda A. How COVID-19 has pushed us into a medical education revolution. Intern Med J. 2020;50(9):1150–3.
Offergeld C, Ketterer M, Neudert M, Hassepaß F, Weerda N, Richter B, Knopf A. „Ab morgen bitte online “: Vergleich digitaler Rahmenbedingungen der curricularen Lehre an nationalen Universitäts-HNO-Kliniken in Zeiten von COVID-19. Hno. 2021;69(3):213–20.
Bock A, Modabber A, Kniha K, Lemos M, Rafai N, Hölzle F. Blended learning modules for lectures on oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;56(10):956–61. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.281. Epub 2018 Nov 14. PMID: 30448012.
Bock A, Heitzer M, Lemos M, Peters F, Elvers D, Kniha K, Hölzle F, Modabber A. "Flipped OR": a modified didactical concept for a surgical clerkship in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;58(10):1245–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 26. PMID: 32222311.
Harries AJ, Lee C, Jones L, Rodriguez RM, Davis JA, Boysen-Osborn M, Kashima KJ, Krane NK, Rae G, Kman N, Langsfeld JM, Juarez M. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical students: a multicenter quantitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02462-1. PMID: 33407422; PMCID: PMC7786337.
O'Connor EE, Fried J, McNulty N, Shah P, Hogg JP, Lewis P, Zeffiro T, Agarwal V, Reddy S. Flipping Radiology Education Right Side Up. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:810–22. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.011.
Knowles M. Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Cambridge, the Adult Education Company; 1975.
Bock A, Elvers D, Goloborodko E, Kramer C, Kniha K, Hölzle F, Spreckelsen C, Modabber A. An innovative PantoDict program for reporting panoramic radiographs using automatic speech recognition in dental education: a randomized observer-blinded study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Oct 10:S2212-
4403(20)31262-1
. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.10.002. Epub ahead of print.
Khalil R, Mansour AE, Fadda WA, Almisnid K, Aldamegh M, Al-Nafeesah A, Alkhalifah A, Al-Wutayd O. The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi 23 Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z.
Agius AM, Gatt G, Vento Zahra E, Busuttil A, Gainza-Cirauqui ML, Cortes ARG, Attard NJ. Self-reported dental student stressors and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Dent Educ. 2021 Feb;85(2):208–15. doi:10.1002/jdd.12409. Epub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32929725.
Klaassen H, Ashida S, Comnick CL, Xie XJ, Smith BM, Tabrizi M, Arsenault K, Capin OR, Scully AC, da Mata C, Soto AP, Dias Ribeiro AP, Prince D, Christensen A, Giner-Tarrida L, Satorres Nieto M, León S, Gambetta-Tessini K, Santos MBF, Dias da Silva MA, Pereira AC, Dias do Carmo E, Aurora Stabile Gonnelli F, Carvalho FG, Collares K, Bervian J, Sarkis-Onofre R, Jerfeson Dos Santos Gonçalves F, Bueno-Silva B, Estela Haddad A, Gurgel BCV, Alves PM, Shigli K, Nayak SS, Nayak PP, Murugaboopathy V, Savitha PN, Murthy V, Deshpande S, Marchini L. COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on dental students: A multi-institutional survey. J Dent Educ. 2021 Mar 27. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12597. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33772784.
Hung M, Licari FW, Hon ES, Lauren E, Su S, Birmingham WC, Wadsworth LL, Lassetter JH, Graff TC, Harman W, Carroll WB, Lipsky MS. In an era of uncertainty: Impact of COVID-19 on dental education. J Dent Educ. 2021 Feb;85(2):148–156. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12404. Epub 2020 Sep 13. PMID: 32920890.
Candler C. Effective use of educational technology in medical education. In: Colloquium on educational technology: recommendations and guidelines for medical educators. Washington: AAMC Institute for Improving Medical Education; 2007.
Loch C, Kuan IBJ, Elsalem L, Schwass D, Brunton PA, Jum'ah A. COVID-19 and dental clinical practice: Students and clinical staff perceptions of health risks and educational impact. J Dent Educ. 2021 Jan;85(1):44–52. doi:10.1002/jdd.12402. Epub 2020 Sep 10. PMID: 32914437.
Iyer P, Aziz K, Ojcius DM. Impact of COVID-19 on dental education in the United States. J Dent Educ. 2020 Jun;84(6):718–22. doi:10.1002/jdd.12163. Epub 2020 Apr 27. PMID: 32342516.

Evaluationsheet.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 01 Dec, 2021

Read the published version in Head & Face Medicine →

Editorial decision: Minor revision
26 Oct, 2021
Review #3 received at journal
22 Oct, 2021
Reviewer #3 agreed at journal
12 Oct, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
10 Oct, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
10 Oct, 2021
Review #2 received at journal
10 Oct, 2021
Review #1 received at journal
10 Oct, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
09 Oct, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
22 Sep, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
21 Sep, 2021
Editor invited by journal
21 Sep, 2021
First submitted to journal
20 Sep, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

One Year of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross Sectional Study on Teaching Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Questionnaire design and distribution

Participants, consent, and ethical considerations

Statistics

Results

Demographics

Lectures and internships

E-learning

Pandemic-related solutions/effects

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1