Inequalities in Delayed Initiation of Breastfeeding: Evidence from Health Surveys in 58 Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2012-2017)

Background: Delay in breastfeeding initiation beyond 1 hour of birth increases the risk of neonatal deaths and illnesses. Despite ample evidence highlighting its importance, wealth-related inequalities exist in delayed breastfeeding initiation rates in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our goal was to examine the magnitude and trend of socio-economic inequalities in delayed breastfeeding initiation rates in LMICs. Methods: We used data from 58 low- and middle-income countries from their most recent Demographic and Health Survey and Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey to present delayed breastfeeding initiation rates across wealth quintile and area of residence. To assess the wealth-related inequalities in delayed breastfeeding initiation rates, we calculated two indicators- the difference, in percentage points, between the rates recorded for the poorest and wealthiest quintiles and the ratio of the same two values. To present the change over time, we calculated- the annual absolute change and annual absolute excess change. Results: Within countries, the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was higher among the wealthiest quintile (median 47.4%) and lower in the poorest quintile (median 42.6%). In 37 study countries, the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was higher among the wealthiest than among the poorest. The highest prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was in South Asia, and the largest levels of pro-rich inequality were in Latin America and Caribbean. Pro-poor inequality was more common in Sub-Saharan Africa. Delayed breastfeeding initiation rates decreased faster in the poorest quintile (median -1.3 percent-points per year) compared to the wealthiest quintile (median -0.8 percent-points per year), indicating an increase in pro-poor inequality over time. Conclusions: There is no distinguishable global pattern for wealth-related inequality in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation. The prevailing inequality may be due to a combination of sociodemographic factors and is largely preventable by incorporating adequate infrastructure towards creating a pro-breastfeeding environment. inequalities in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation in 58 low- and middle-income countries spanning all world regions and presents how the prevalence changed over ten years. We report how women at the extreme ends of the wealth index within these countries are at disadvantageous positions related to the initiation of breastfeeding. positive of absolute difference obtained for 37 study countries, suggesting a pro-poor inequality where the prevalence of delayed higher among the wealthiest than among the poorest. Most of these are within-country and Our that pro-breastfeeding the and how it relates to post-birth health service patterns. They also a need to further enhance the facilitation of the post-birth care platform in these countries and make it accessible to families of all socio-economic statuses irrespective of their mode and place of childbirth. The pro-poor inequality found in this suggests that the wealthiest families in many LMICs require appropriate encouragement and support to ensure proper breastfeeding practices. Governments and program managers should include evidence-based care platforms to support appropriate and timely breastfeeding practices immediately after childbirth, regardless of a woman’s socio-economic status. Our results will help governments and program managers better assess the impact of the socio-economic prole of a country when designing and implementing integrated and contextually appropriate strategies to improve breastfeeding initiation practices. Findings from this study will allow health managers to learn from experiences and practices in other socioeconomically comparable countries. regardless of all distal or proximal socio-economic factors [9, 66]. However, most low- and middle-income countries do not have an effective, accountable monitoring system to track the implementation of the recommended strategies. Timely breastfeeding initiation is a critical practice that can accelerate a country’s progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals to improve maternal and child health and end malnutrition and poverty. The observed pro-poor inequality in this study suggests that delayed breastfeeding initiation can be largely prevented by incorporating adequate infrastructure and accountability and improved health service delivery in community and health care settings. Additional country-specic exploration is required to understand the factors associated with the pro-poor and pro-rich inequalities in breastfeeding initiation time. Such information would allow governments and program managers to develop appropriate and tailored strategies for disadvantaged subgroups to ensure equitable uptake of the practice of breastfeeding initiation with the rst hour of birth.


Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that all infants be put to their mother's breast immediately after birth to ensure early optimum growth and development of newborns is sustained through infancy [1]. In addition, global guidelines, including the Baby-friendly hospital initiative (BFHI) [2] and early essential newborn care (EENC) [3], outline the importance of initiation of breastfeeding within the rst hour of birth. Initiation of breastfeeding within 1 hour of birth is necessary because it helps enhance a newborn's immune response to infectious pathogens [4,5] and protects them from infection associated newborn deaths [6,7] and severe illnesses [8]. Furthermore, initiating breastfeeding on time has a limited direct cost and is highly cost-effective in preventing adverse health outcomes extending throughout infancy [9]. Systematic reviews [7,10], pooled analysis [11], primary studies [12,13], and global reports by UNICEF and WHO [14,15] all con rm that delaying breastfeeding initiation beyond 1 hour of birth is associated with at least 1.3 times higher risk newborn deaths. The risk of newborn deaths further increases to 2.4 times higher risk when breastfeeding is initiated after the rst day [10].
Despite strong evidence supporting breastfeeding initiation within 1 hour of birth, three-fths of the world's newborns ranging from as high as 68% of newborns in East Asia and Paci c to 35% in Eastern and Southern Africa, begin breastfeeding beyond the rst hour [14,16]. According to the WHO's tool for measuring and rating infant and young child feeding practices, the global prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation falls considerably short of a 'very good' score [17] with four of the WHO regions (East Asia and Paci c, Middle East and North Africa, South Asia and Western and Central Africa) performing at a 'fair' rate. Equity in maternal and child health indicators implies that all women and children can access their 'full health potential' and that socio-economic status does not cause anyone to be left behind [18]. Inequality in breastfeeding indicators has not been static over the years. While there is no prevailing pattern in delayed breastfeeding initiation globally [14,19], studies in many countries have reported socio-economic factors relating to wealth associated with delayed breastfeeding initiation [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], where wealthier women are often delaying breastfeeding initiation beyond the rst hour of birth.
The global strategy for Every Woman Every Child identi es breastfeeding initiation within 1 hour of birth and exclusive breastfeeding for six months as crucial towards achieving SDG targets on child survival, health and nutrition [28]. While there is ample evidence of socio-economic inequalities in continued breastfeeding till 23 months of child's age [16], there is limited evidence on the inequalities in delayed breastfeeding initiation and exclusive breastfeeding till six months [29]. An independent expert review group on information and accountability for women's and children's health identi es breastfeeding as a maternal or child health indicator that displays a pro-poor nature [30]. The worldwide prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation decreased from 68% in 2000 to 51% in 2020 [15]. But unlike other breastfeeding indicators, there has been no multi-country exploration to con rm the nature of the inequality in this crucial indicator. Evaluating progress only at the global level does not account for critical socio-economic factors contributing to pro-poor or pro-rich patterns across and within countries. Measuring and monitoring inequalities in delayed breastfeeding initiation across countries can help identify higher-risk subgroups and inform the design of equity-oriented interventions to support timely breastfeeding initiation as appropriate for the country. This paper explores the economic inequalities in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation in 58 low-and middle-income countries spanning all world regions and presents how the prevalence changed over ten years. We report how women at the extreme ends of the wealth index within these countries are at disadvantageous positions related to the initiation of breastfeeding.

Measures
'Delayed breastfeeding initiation' is the primary outcome of interest in this study. We de ned delayed initiation as women who reported having initiated breastfeeding after the rst hour of birth. It included children born alive in the two years preceding the surveys and put to their mother's breast one hour or more after birth. The survey interviewers asked women aged 15-49 with a live birth in the two years preceding the survey when they put their child to the breast using the following unprompted self-reported question-'How long after birth did you rst put (name of child) to the breast?'. We used the WHO recommended cut off for timely initiation of breastfeeding [1].
None of the DHS and MICS surveys collected data on household income and expenditure. Thus, we used the household wealth index as a proxy indicator to determine household socio-economic status to ascertain rich-poor differentials [35,36]. We used principal component analysis to construct a wealth index based on ownership of selected household assets, housing quality, water and sanitation facilities, and place of residence [35]. We used 12 common household assets and housing materials to compute the household wealth index [37][38][39]. Each household was thus assigned a wealth score representing its position relative to other households within the country. We divided these scores into quintiles, with the rst quintile (Q1) representing the poorest 20% of households and the fth quintile (Q5) representing the wealthiest 20%. To describe the change in inequality over the preceding decade, we extracted additional information on the historical prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation from countries that reported it between 2002 and 2007.

Statistical Analysis
We presented the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation at the national level and for each wealth quintile. We examined the absolute socioeconomic inequality in delayed breastfeeding initiation by subtracting the prevalence among the poorest from the wealthiest. In addition, we used the ratio of the prevalence in the wealthiest and poorest as a measure of relative inequality. We also demonstrated the correlation between a country's income inequality and absolute wealth-related inequality in delayed initiation of breastfeeding. We used the Gini coe cient as a relative measure of a country's income inequality with values ranging from 0 (complete equality) to 1 (perfect inequality) [40,41]. The Gini index assumes redistribution of income across the country's residents by raising the income of the poorest at the cost of a reduced income of the wealthiest [40]. We extracted the Gini index of each country from the World Bank database [41] if a Gini index was available for each included country in the survey year or within ve years before the survey.
This ensured time appropriate representation of the country's level of inequality around a similar time to the survey. Gini index was not included in this analysis if none were reported ve years before the survey. We further present the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation across wealth quintiles, strati ed by place of residence.
To report the change in pace over an approximately 10-year period, we calculated the absolute difference in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation between 2 survey years of the same country. First, we took the absolute change in the national prevalence and then reported change over time within the poorest and wealthiest quintiles. Then, to compare the rate of change in prevalence between the two quintiles per year, we calculated the annual absolute excess change by subtracting the absolute difference in the wealthiest from the absolute change in the poorest and then dividing it by the number of years between the two surveys [19]. Considering the health outcome we are exploring is an 'undesirable' one [19], a positive excess change indicates that the rate of change was more favourable for the wealthiest than the rate of change in the poorest quintile. Similarly, a negative value indicates that the rate of change in prevalence was more favourable for the poorest group.
We performed all statistical analyses using STATA version 15 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Statistical signi cance was considered at a 95% con dence interval for prevalence estimates and absolute and relative inequality measures. We used the sample weights already in the datasets to obtain all country-level estimates. We then used the number of women 15-49 years in each of these countries as reported by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) population survey to de-normalize the standard weights to ensure the appropriate contribution of data within each country [42]. The analysis settings of the dataset were assigned using the command 'svyset' in Stata to designate the sampling unit, survey weights and the cluster design of the survey and obtain standard errors of all estimates.

Results
Our analysis included a total of 298,656 women from 58 countries who had a live birth in the two years preceding each survey. In the appended dataset of all countries, about 53.8% had breastfeeding initiated after the rst hour of birth.  Supplementary Fig. 1) presents the delayed breastfeeding initiation rates across all wealth quintiles and the absolute (difference) and relative (ratio) inequality in the prevalence between the wealthiest and the poorest quintiles. The prevalence of delayed initiation of breastfeeding ranged from 15.0% in Burundi to 83.4% in Guinea. In more than one third (n = 21) of the study countries breastfeeding initiation rates were higher than 50%, which has been rated by WHO as "fair" performance based on past analysis of the prevalence of timely breastfeeding initiation in developing countries [17].
According to the same WHO tool, none of the included countries had a prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation lower than 10%-cut off for "very good" performance [17]. In 25 study countries, the delayed initiation was higher than 50% ("fair") in the wealthiest quintile, including eight countries with a prevalence of more than 70% ("poor") among the wealthiest. In comparison, the prevalence in 18 countries in the poorest quintile was higher than 50%, ve of which had a prevalence greater than 70%. A positive value of absolute difference was obtained for 37 study countries, suggesting a pro-poor inequality where the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was higher among the wealthiest than among the poorest. Most of these countries are in Sub-Saharan Africa. The positive absolute difference was higher than 20 percentage points in Thailand, Guyana, and Guatemala. On the other hand, for 21 study countries, we obtained a negative value which denotes a pro-rich inequality where the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was higher among the poorest than in the wealthiest. The negative value for the absolute difference was less than ten percentage points in four countries, namely, Ukraine, Maldives, Cameroon, Uganda. Figure 1 presents the median, interquartile range and the variation in the prevalence of breastfeeding initiation across all wealth quintiles for all countries and by region. In all countries combined, the median prevalence of delayed initiation was 42 In Fig. 2, we plotted the absolute inequality in delayed breastfeeding initiation against the national prevalence. There was no distinguishable clustering of countries by world region. The 'zero-line indicates no inequality. Twelve countries were within ±2.5 percent points of the zero-line indicating low or no absolute inequality in delayed breastfeeding initiation. Of the 12 countries, eight are in Sub-Saharan Africa, two in South Asia, and one in Europe and Central Asia and East Asia and the Paci c. Four countries (Gabon, Sao Tome, Thailand and Tunisia) demonstrated a high positive value for absolute inequality (≥10 percent points) alongside a high national prevalence (≥60%), indicating a high pro-poor inequality. Conversely, Cameroon reported a high negative value for absolute inequality (≥-10 percent points) alongside a high national prevalence (≥60%) indicating a high pro-rich inequality. All study countries in Latin America and the Caribbean had a high positive value for absolute inequality, with delayed initiation more prevalent among the wealthiest quintile. Figure 3 shows the pattern between absolute inequality in the prevalence of delayed initiation of breastfeeding and the overall income inequality in the countries. The correlation coe cient (r) between the country-level income inequality and absolute inequality in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was very low (r = 0.09). Table 2 presents the strati ed prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation across the poorest and wealthiest quintiles by place of residence. In 25 study countries, the prevalence of delayed initiation was higher among the wealthiest quintile in urban and rural areas. In seven countries, the prevalence was higher among the poorest in the rural areas, with an absolute inequality of more than − 10 percent points. In contrast, in three of these countries (Cameroon, Uganda, Yemen), the wealthiest quintile in the urban areas had higher delayed initiation. Cameroon showed the steepest gradient across the wealth quintiles in rural areas with a percentage point difference of -40.4 between the wealthiest and poorest. At the same time, Sudan had the steepest gradient of -29.2 percent points in urban areas. On the other hand, Cambodia (percent point difference 33.5) and Guyana (percent point difference 28.2) had the steepest gradient in urban and rural areas, respectively, where delayed initiation was more prevalent among the wealthiest quintile. Trend in inequality Table 3 presents the change in prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation at the national level and in the wealthiest and the poorest quintiles over time.   Figure 4 demonstrates the variation in the pace of change in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation between the poorest and wealthiest quintiles against the absolute change per year. The national prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation reduced over time in 30 countries. While the national prevalence increased in the Dominican Republic, Egypt and Chad, the increase was faster in the poorest quintile than the wealthiest quintile. At the same time, the reduction in delayed breastfeeding initiation in the poorest quintile outpaced the drop in the wealthiest quintiles in 12 countries, with the largest decline in the poorest quintile in Cote'd Ivoire. Similarly, in Cambodia, Mali, Nepal and Guyana, the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation decreased, favouring the poorest quintile ( Fig. 4: top left quadrant). Zimbabwe, Thailand, Liberia, and Pakistan experienced a national increase in delayed breastfeeding initiation (Fig. 4: top right quadrant), with the increase among the poorest quintile outpacing the wealthiest in these countries.

Main Findings
The inequality in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation does not depict a clear pro-poor or pro-rich pattern. In 64% (n = 37) of our study countries, delayed breastfeeding initiation was higher among the wealthiest (pro-poor) while it was higher among the poorest in 21 countries (pro-rich). The prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation and the extent of within-country differences varied across wealth quintiles and countries, with the highest within-country difference in Thailand and Guyana. Our ndings suggest that pro-breastfeeding programs must consider the socio-economic context within the country and how it relates to post-birth health service patterns. They also suggest a need to further enhance the facilitation of the postbirth care platform in these countries and make it accessible to families of all socio-economic statuses irrespective of their mode and place of childbirth.
The pro-poor inequality found in this paper suggests that the wealthiest families in many LMICs require appropriate encouragement and support to ensure proper breastfeeding practices. Governments and program managers should include evidence-based care platforms to support appropriate and timely breastfeeding practices immediately after childbirth, regardless of a woman's socio-economic status. Our results will help governments and program managers better assess the impact of the socio-economic pro le of a country when designing and implementing integrated and contextually appropriate strategies to improve breastfeeding initiation practices. Findings from this study will allow health managers to learn from experiences and practices in other socioeconomically comparable countries.
Overall, we found a weak correlation between income inequality and wealth-related inequality in delayed breastfeeding initiation in the study countries. The highest level of absolute inequality (pro-poor) in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was observed in Latin America and the Caribbean. Income inequality is historically known to be higher in this region [43]. We also found income inequality and absolute difference in delayed breastfeeding initiation higher in this region than other world regions and had the strongest correlation. The high absolute inequality in Latin American countries suggests that signi cant reforms are required in promoting pro-breastfeeding strategies and guidelines while accounting for the local practices, especially among those in the wealthiest quintile. However, in general, Latin American LMICs have a lower prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation [44]. Our results con rm that absolute inequality in breastfeeding initiation is not correlated with income inequality in the Sub-Saharan African region. Thirteen Sub-Saharan African countries had a pro-rich inequality, suggesting the need to implement pro-poor strategies to support appropriate breastfeeding practices while accounting for local-level dynamics and cultural practices.

Strengths and limitations
The key strength of this study was that we used large nationally representative surveys from 58 countries spanning six regions of the world. The use of comparable and standardized data collected from large nationwide population samples allowed us to present consistent comparisons of within-country inequalities in breastfeeding initiation rates over time.
Our study has some limitations. Firstly, we could not portray the within-country cultural practices and beliefs surrounding the timely initiation of breastfeeding. Such cultural beliefs could help us better understand the combined role of socio-economic status and cultural context in in uencing delayed breastfeeding initiation. However, this information is not within the scope of the data collection in the DHS and MICs surveys and hence could not be explored. Secondly, this study does not include data from all low-and middle-income countries from all the world regions. Interesting observations from any of the missed countries may have further enriched our interpretations. Moreover, in this study, we included few countries from Latin America and the Caribbean, and thus, ndings may not be regionally representative. Thirdly, the surveys recorded breastfeeding initiation time from mothers' responses taken at the survey time. This approach could introduce both reporting and recall bias as mothers whose infants were healthy at the time of the survey are more likely to report appropriate breastfeeding initiation than mothers whose infants experienced poor health or died before the survey. Lastly, women from higher wealth quintiles are more likely to experience caesarean section birth. They may not be aware of the actual time of breastfeeding initiation in the post-surgical period. Data from health personnel present at the time of childbirth would be more informative. However, such triangulation of information was not within the scope of the DHS and MICS surveys.

Possible reasons for ndings
The reasons for the variation in delayed breastfeeding initiation within each country are complex and context-speci c. The higher prevalence of caesarean section births (which increase the likelihood of delayed breastfeeding initiation) [45][46][47] among the wealthiest quintile [48,49] partly explains the pro-poor inequality. Several previous studies have explored reasons for the higher likelihood of delayed breastfeeding initiation among caesarean section births [46,47]. Mothers in the wealthiest quintile are more likely to experience caesarean section births, which increases their likelihood of delayed breastfeeding initiation [50,51]. Similarly, lower rates of caesarean section births in countries experiencing a pro-rich inequality, most of which are in Sub-Saharan Africa, can explain the higher prevalence of delayed initiation among the poorest. Studies have reported factors like mother's education, parity, skilled attendance at childbirth, home delivery, and urban residence as barriers for timely breastfeeding initiation, especially among the poorest quintile [50].
Further explanation may be related to the knowledge and skill level of the individuals present at the time of birth especially considering the place and mode of childbirth. Women from the poorest quintiles of countries with poor health infrastructure are more likely to experience childbirth at home without skilled health personnel [52,53], increasing their likelihood of experiencing delayed breastfeeding initiation. This reason could explain the pattern observed in Niger, Chad, Ethiopia and Nigeria, where the rates of home births are high [54,55], and skilled attendance at birth is less than 50% [56]. The pro-rich pattern of absolute inequality we detected in these countries helps explain this pattern.
This study explored the absolute place of residence inequality [56] in delayed breastfeeding initiation. When disaggregated by residence, the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation differed greatly between urban and rural areas. Nearly half of the countries reported a higher level of inequality in urban than in rural areas, and three-fth of these countries showed a pro-rich inequality. This nding suggests the need for pro-poor strategies to be developed speci cally for the poorest in urban areas of 11 Sub-Saharan African countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Sierra Leon, Malawi, Gambia, Sao Tome, Namibia, Rwanda, Zambia, Ghana, Liberia and Senegal). Overall, the regional level median prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation was higher in urban areas.
We observed an absence of a prevailing global pattern in wealth-related inequality in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation, which was similar to previous studies [16] and global reports [14,56]. Programs promoting appropriate breastfeeding practices need to consider the within-country socioeconomic context, health system capacity, and standard feeding practices across the socio-economic gradient in each country. At the individual and community level, factors in uencing a woman or her family's decision on the time of breastfeeding initiation is affected by socio-economic factors including place of residence [57], availability of and access to post-childbirth care information [58], prevalent postnatal practices in the community [59], education [60], and media exposure [25,61].
We can learn important lessons from countries like Mali, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Burundi, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Malawi and Rwanda, where the national prevalence of delayed initiation is lower than the global median, and the absolute inequality is close to zero. Studies from Rwanda and Malawi [62] show how intensive campaigns to increase awareness of appropriate breastfeeding practices and equipping the health workforce with professional skills to support breastfeeding initiation [14] can reduce inequality within a country.
Patterns concerning the 10-year trend in delayed breastfeeding initiation are not clear. The largest annual absolute reduction in delayed breastfeeding initiation was in Ukraine in both the poorest and the wealthiest. The pace of decline was identical in both wealth groups. According to the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative (WBTi) [63], Ukraine is one of the top-ranking countries in Europe to adequately establish and monitor the implementation of breastfeeding policies and programs as recommended by the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding [63, 64]. The annual absolute excess change had the highest positive value for Cote d'Ivoire, suggesting that the decrease in the prevalence of delayed breastfeeding initiation occurred faster among the poorest than the wealthiest. There has been a decline in the rate of delayed breastfeeding in Cote d'Ivoire since the government implemented integrated strategies to improve breastfeeding practices [65].

Conclusion
Our results suggest that delayed breastfeeding initiation is an undesirable health behaviour common among the rich compared to the poor in many countries. The WHO and BFHI guidelines outline the steps to successfully initiate breastfeeding regardless of all distal or proximal socio-economic factors [9,66]. However, most low-and middle-income countries do not have an effective, accountable monitoring system to track the implementation of the recommended strategies. Timely breastfeeding initiation is a critical practice that can accelerate a country's progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals to improve maternal and child health and end malnutrition and poverty. The observed pro-poor inequality in this study suggests that delayed breastfeeding initiation can be largely prevented by incorporating adequate infrastructure and accountability and improved health service delivery in community and health care settings. Additional country-speci c exploration is required to understand the factors associated with the pro-poor and prorich inequalities in breastfeeding initiation time. Such information would allow governments and program managers to develop appropriate and tailored strategies for disadvantaged subgroups to ensure equitable uptake of the practice of breastfeeding initiation with the rst hour of birth.
SR designed and conducted the research, analyzed data, wrote the paper, and had primary responsibility for nal content; SSP assisted in data extraction and analysis; TMH provided critical guidance on statistical analysis; MJD, TMH and AA critically reviewed the manuscript; and all authors: read and approved the nal manuscript.
Delayed breastfeeding initiation rates by economic status by World Bank regions . Circles indicate countries, with each country represented by ve circles (one for each wealth quintile). Horizontal lines indicate the median (middle point of estimates) of all countries within each subgroup, and the rectangular boxes indicate the interquartile range Delayed breastfeeding initiation rates compared with wealth-related inequality in breastfeeding initiation time (difference between wealthiest and poorest fths) in 58 low-and middle-income countries, by World Bank region . Shapes indicate countries, with countries in each region represented by one shape. Dashed black lines indicate the median (middle point) of all countries