Progesterone Gel and Placebo were Equally Effective in Preventing Preterm Birth Among Women with Preterm Labor

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-923845/v1

Download PDF

Research

Progesterone Gel and Placebo were Equally Effective in Preventing Preterm Birth Among Women with Preterm Labor

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-923845/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Introduction The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of maintenance treatment with vaginal progesterone gel compared to placebo in preventing preterm birth after the onset of preterm labor.

Methods A randomised controlled trial in Sweden in 2009 − 18. Women with preterm labor were randomized to daily doses of progesterone gel 90 mg (n = 29) or placebo (n = 29) after standard treatment with intravenous tocolytics. Women with intravenous tocolytics alone served as controls.

Results The latency to delivery was 58 ± 34 days with progesterone and 64 ± 51 days with placebo (p = 0.83), compared to 2 ± 2 days in the control group (progesterone and placebo vs control p < 0.001). The rate of preterm birth before 34 weeks was 34 % after progesterone and 38 % after placebo (p = 0.34) compared to 100 % in the control group (p < 0.001 respectively). The composite neonatal morbidity (p = 0.65) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = 0.12) were comparable between the progesterone and placebo groups, but lower in these groups compared neonates of women in the control group (p < 0.001 respectively).

Conclusion Maintenance treatment with progesterone gel and placebo were equally effective in preventing preterm birth among women with preterm labor. Both progesterone and placebo prolonged pregnancy more effectively than intravenous tocolysis alone. We hypothesize, that the acidic gel base reinforced the biochemical barrier at the uterine cervix, which counteracted ascending pathogen invasion and subsequent inflammation and thereby delayed preterm birth. The present results suggest, that non-hormonal agents that reinforce the biochemical cervical barrier can be useful for the prevention of preterm birth in clinical practice.

Sexual & Reproductive Medicine

Endocrinology & Metabolism

Cervical ripening

chorioamnionitis

microbiome vaginal

preterm birth

preterm labor

progesterone

tocolytics

The global rate of preterm birth (PTB) − the main cause of neonatal, infant and child mortality up to 5 years age − is still 10 % [1]. Risk factors include psychosocial stress, malnutrition, low and high maternal age, multiple pregnancy, decidual bleeding, uterine infection due to ascending pathogen invasion, and alterations in the vaginal microbiome [2 − 7]. Current intravenous and oral tocolytic treatments do not prevent PTB, but are given with an aim to delay delivery for at least 48 hours to optimise the effect of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation and allow for transport to a tertiary hospital with Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) expertise [8]. A cervical length (CL) ≤ 25 mm in early pregnancy is regarded as a primary predictor for PTB [9].

The connective tissue remodeling of the uterine cervix which precedes term and preterm labor is characterized by an increased density of macrophages in the cervical tissue, release of proinflammatory cytokines and prostaglandin E, a functional progesterone withdrawal, activation of metalloproteinase (MMP) enzymes, a changed proteoglycan composition with dispersion of collagen fibrils, and collagen degradation. These biochemical events lead to cervical effacement and dilatation that allow for childbirth [4 − 7, 10].

Progesterone is regarded as the primary hormone for pregnancy maintenance, but reports on prophylactic treatment with bioidentical progesterone or synthetic progestins such as 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OH − PC) for the prevention of PTB are inconclusive [2]. Bioidentical progesterone has no androgenic effects that might affect the lipid metabolism or harm the fetus. Since oral progesterone is poorly absorbed because of the liver metabolism, daily progesterone injections would be painful, a transdermal progesterone preparation has not been available in obstetrics, vaginal treatment is used in clinical practice [2, 11]. Prophylactic treatment, which is recommended by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) for asymptomatic women with a previous PTB or a short CL, is effective according to some studies except from those with the largest sample size [2, 12, 13]. Extensive screening programmes are needed to evaluate prophylactic strategies since only 10–20 % of women with spontaneous PTB have a previous PTB [2, 9] and only 1 % of asymptomatic women have a CL ≤ 25 mm in early pregnancy [14].

Aim. The aim was to compare the effect of maintenance treatment with progesterone gel to placebo gel for the prevention of PTB after the onset of preterm labor (PTL). The participating women were randomized to the maintenance treatments after intravenous tocolytics according to standard clinical routines. We hypothesized, that progesterone would be more effective than the placebo [15]. Women who received intravenous tocolytics alone were identified in retrospect and served as a control group.

Trial design. This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Obstetric Unit, Department of Women´s and Children´s Health, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden between December 2009 and January 2018.

Ethics approval

and registration. Ethics approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board for Medical Sciences in Stockholm in September 2007, No 2007-311-31. The trial was registered at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT), that participates in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry Platform in September 2007, No 2007-003348-31, and was approved by the Swedish Medical Products Agency in May 2008, No 151:2008/30388. All treatments were performed according to the relevant clinical guidelines and regulations, and all participants were included after informed oral and written consent. Ethics approval for the control group of women, who received standard intravenous tocolytics alone in the same years 2009–18 was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board for Medical Sciences in Stockholm in April 2015, No 2014/255 − 31. Since data from the control group were collected in retrospect and presented on a group basis only, individual consent was not required.

Participant recruitment. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, intact fetal membranes, and spontaneous PTL between 24 and 28 gestational weeks resulting in a CL < 25 mm determined by transvaginal ultrasound. Exclusion critera were multiple pregnancy, ruptured fetal membranes, cervical dilatation, cervical cerclage, signs or symptoms of chorioamnionitis, previous uterine surgery, prophylactic progesterone treatment, intercurrent maternal diseases, pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia or gestational diabetes, intrauterine fetal growth restriction or fetal malformations (Fig. 1). The participants were informed about the randomized trial by an obstetrician at the hospital, and they received standard intravenous tocolysis before start of the treatments. Randomization was carried out after oral and written consent, using a computerised blocked system and with closed envelopes. Data were collected in retsrospect from the control group of women with identical inclusion and exclusion criteria who received standard intravenous tocolytics alone in the same years 2009–18. Preterm labor was uterine contractions ≥ 2/10 min for > 30 min according to cardiotocography (CTG) recorded in electronic obstetric records (Obstetrix, Cerner AB, Stockholm, Sweden), which resulted in a CL < 25 mm determined by transvaginal ultrasound carried out by a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology due to standardized criteria.

Interventions. The maintenance treatments were daily doses of vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone, 90 mg/dose, Merck KGaA, Germany) or daily doses of the placebo gel, which is an emulsion of oil and water with an acidic pH 3.0 (Replens, CampusPharma AB, Sweden). It was not possible to blind the gel packages due to practical reasons. The treatments started after standard intravenous tocolytics and continued until 34 + 0 weeks, rupture of the fetal membranes or childbirth whatever occurred first. In all years studied, standard intravenous tocolytics consisted of a bolus dose of the oxytocin receptor antagonist atosiban (Tractocile, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Sweden) 6.75 mg followed by infusion of 300 µg/min during 3 hours and thereafter 100 µg/min until 48 hours. Alternatively, a β2-adrenergic receptor agonist terbutaline (Bricanyl, AstraZeneca PLC, Great Britain) 5 µg/mL was given for 48 hours according to the individual obstetrician´s choice. All women received two doses of betamethasone (Betapred, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB) 12 mg intramuscularly 12 ─ 24 hours apart for fetal lung maturation. In line with standard clinical routines, the participants with PTL and intact fetal membranes did not receive prophylactic antibiotics. All women in active labor at a gestational age < 37 + 0 weeks received intrapartum prophylaxis with bensylpenicillin 3 g every 6 hours. All women in all groups were seen at least weekly by an obstetrician after discharge from the antenatal unit in case of regression of PTL.

Outcomes. The analyses included all randomized participants according to the intention to treat concept. We did not epect drop outs, since the participants were randomized after thorough informed consent and were seen frequently by an obstetrician. The primary outcome latency to delivery was calculated from the first gel dose to childbirth in the treatment groups, and from the start of intravenous tocolysis to childbirth in the control group. The secondary outcomes were delivery ≤ 7 days, rates of PTB < 34 weeks and < 37 weeks, neonatal birth weight (BW), composite neonatal morbidity, NICU admission and length of NICU stay. Composite neonatal morbidity was Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, the incidence of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), intraventricular hemorrage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and sepsis ≤ 7 days, taken together with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and neonatal death during NICU stay. Neonatal RDS was defined by clinical diagnosis of type I RDS and a requirement of oxygen therapy for at least 24 hours. Maternal adverse effects such as fatigue, headache, or intrahepatic cholestasis were monitored.

Sample size. We expected, that the latency to delivery would be 30 % longer after progesterone compared to placebo. According to a power analysis, a sample size of n = 29 in each group would be required to reach a significance of 5 % and power of 80 % [16].

Statistical analysis. Continuous data were analyzed using Mann Whitney U-test, and were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were analyzed with Chi²-test and Fisher´s exact test when appropriate, and were presented as numbers and percentages. Confidence intervals and composite neonatal morbidity were analyzed with One way ANOVA. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

We evaluated the effect of maintenance treatment with vaginal progesterone gel (n = 29) compared to placebo (n = 29) in preventing PTB after the onset of PTL at an early gestational age. The maintenance treatments were given after standard intravenous tocolytics. Women with identical inclusion and exclusion criteria who received intravenous tocolytics alone (n = 29) were identified in retrospect and served as a control group. The rate of early PTB before 28 + 0 weeks was < 1 % of the n = 33 697 births at our hospital in 2009–18.

Maternal characteristics. Maternal characteristics are shown in Table 1. The demographic data were comparable between the groups. The participants in all groups had a medical history of a previous PTB in 25 % and first or second trimester spontaneous abortion in 25 % (data not shown). The mean gestational age at the beginning of the treatments, and at the start of tocolytics in the control group, was 26–27 weeks, where 82 % of the participants were included between 24–27 weeks and 8 % between 28–31 weeks. The CL (mean ± SD) at the beginning of treatment was 11 ± 5 mm in the progesterone group, 12 ± 5 mm in the placebo group, and 14 ± 7 mm at the start of tocolytics in the control group. The mean circulating level of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) was low ≤ 10 mg/L in all groups (data not shown).

Maternal outcome. Maternal outcome is shown in Table 2. The latency to delivery (mean ± SD) was 58 ± 34 days in the progesterone group and 64 ± 51 days in the placebo group (p = 0.83). The rate of PTB < 34 weeks was 34 % with progesterone and 38 % with placebo (p = 0.32), and the rate of PTB < 37 weeks was 52 % with progesterone and 45 % with placebo (p = 0.65). The compliance rates were high. One participant in each group had her treatment interrupted before 34 weeks after referral to another hospital, and both gave birth after 37 weeks. One woman in the progesterone group, who had an emergency cervical cerclage on maternal request after inclusion continued her progesterone treatment and gave birth at 34 weeks. No severe maternal side effects such as headache or intrahepatic cholestasis were reported. One woman in the progesterone group reported fatigue. In the control group, the latency to delivery was 2 ± 2 days (progesterone and placebo vs control p < 0.001), and the rate of PTB < 34 weeks was 100 % (progesterone vs control p = 0.01; placebo vs control p = 0.02).

Neonatal outcome. Neonatal outcome is shown in Table 3. The BW (mean ± SD) was 2471 ± 1078 g in the progesterone group and 2452 ± 1054 in the placebo group (p = 0.84). The composite neonatal morbidity was 72 % (21/29) after progesterone and 65 % (19/29) after placebo (p = 0.65). The rate of NICU admission was 31 % (9/29) after progesterone and 24 % (7/29) after placebo, and the mean length of NICU stay was 10 days in both groups (p = 0.59). Two neonatal deaths occurred during the NICU stay in the progesterone group and one in the placebo group. These neonatal deaths were caused by postnatally diagnosed severe malformations and chromosomal aberrations and were not associated with the different treatments. In the control group, the BW (mean ± SD) was 1023 ± 409 g (progesterone and placebo vs control p < 0.001), the composite morbidity was120 % (57/29) (progesterone and placebo vs control p < 0.001), the rate of NICU admission was 100 % (29/29) and the mean NICU stay 70 days (progesterone and placebo vs control p < 0.001). Two neonatal deaths occurred during the NICU stay.

We have compared the effect of maintenance treatment with vaginal progesterone gel to placebo for the prevention of PTB among women with PTL at an early gestational age. The treatments started after standard intravenous tocolytics, and women with identical inclusion and exclusion criteria who received intravenous tocolytics alone served as a control group.

We found, that the effect of maintenance treatment with progesterone gel was comparable to the effect of the placebo, and the hypothesis was therefore rejected. The primary outcome latency to delivery and the secondary outcomes rate of delivery within 7 days, and rates of PTB before 34 and 37 weeks were comparable between the progesterone and placebo groups. As a consequence, neonates of mothers in the progesterone and placebo groups had comparable mean BW, composite neonatal morbidities, rates of NICU admission, and lengths of NICU stay. However, the maternal and neonatal outcomes in the progesterone and placebo groups differed markedly compared to the control group of women who received standard intravenous tocolytics alone. Women in the progesterone and placebo groups had longer latency to delivery, lower rates of delivery within 7 days, and lower rates of PTB than controls. As a result, neonates of mothers in the progesterone and placebo groups had higher mean BW, lower composite morbidities, lower rates of NICU admission and shorter lengths of NICU stay compared to neonates of women in the control group.

The present results suggest, that the gel vehicle rather than the progesterone component was the factor that prevented PTB. Most likely, the acidic gel vehicle reinforced the biochemical barrier at the uterine cervix, which protected the pregnancy from pathogen invasion and uterine infection and thereby delayed PTB. A physiological Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiome promotes an acidic low pH less than 4.5, which constitutes a biochemical barrier against ascending pathogens from the skin and bowel microbiota. This biochemical barrier protects the pregnancy from infection which is a known trigger of myometrial contractions and PTL. The physiological vaginal microbiome undergoes significant changes during pregnancy resulting in a more acidic lower pH. In contrast, alterations in the vaginal microbiome resulting in a higher pH are associated with PTB [7, 17]. The present results were in accordance with reports on uterine infection due to ascending pathogen invasion as an ethiology behind 30–60 % of all early PTB [2]. The present findings were also in agreement with results showing that the gel base exerts anti-inflammatory effects, decreases the cervical collagen metabolizing enzyme MMP-13, and delays PTB [18].

Randomized trials on maintenance treatment with vaginal progesterone after the onset of PTL are warranted, as only a few trials on this topic have been published [19]. Two trials report longer latency to delivery after vaginal progesterone compared to no treatment [15, 20], one trial reports longer latency to delivery after progesterone compared to placebo [21], and one reports no differences after vaginal progesterone, intramuscular progestin 17OH-PC, or no treatment [22]. The discrepancies between the present results and previous ones could be explained by the different study designs. Participants in the present trial were included at mean 26 weeks in contrast to 31 weeks or more [15, 20 − 21] and 28 weeks or more [22] in previous trials. Spontaneous PTL was 2 or more uterine contractions per 10 min for more than 30 min resulting in a CL less than 25 mm without cervical dilatation determined by transvaginal ultrasound in the present trial and one of the previous trials [22], in contrast to cervical shortening and/or softening or dilatation [15], cervical softening, shortening at least by 50 % and dilatation less than 2 cm [20] or cervical dilatation and/or effacement [21] assessed by digital examination. Transvaginal ultrasound is recommended for CL determination in women with PTL, whereas the accuracy of digital assessment is questioned [13, 14]. Intravenous tocolysis in the present trial consisted of an oxytocin receptor antagonist or a β2−receptor agonist in contrast to magnesium sulfate in combination with ampicillin [15], a β2−receptor agonist [20], magnesium sulfate in combination with pethidine and ampicillin [21], an oxytocin receptor antagonist, a calcium blocker or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) [22]. The maintenance treatment consisted of progesterone gel 90 mg in the present trial, in contrast to vaginal progesterone suppositories 400 mg [15] or 200 mg [20 − 22] in previous reports.

Different bioavailabilities of the progesterone preparations could have influenced the diverse results in the present trial and the previous ones. However, the clinical effects are similar when vaginal progesterone gel is compared to a progesterone suppository for luteal phase support in early pregnancy [23].

Strengths of this trial were the consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria, the transvaginal ultrasound CL determination, and that all data were retrieved from original electronic obstetric records at one hospital. Limitations were the lack of double blinded design and the slow inclusion of participants. It is possible also, that the inclusion and follow-up in the treatment groups reduced chronic psychosocial stress, which is a known risk factor of PTL, and thereby prevented PTB in these groups [24 − 25].

The present results showed, that maintenance treatment with vaginal progesterone gel and placebo were equally effective in preventing PTB among women with PTL. However, both progesterone and placebo prolonged pregnancy more effectively than intravenous tocolysis alone. We hypothesize, that the acidic gel base reinforced the biochemical barrier at the uterine cervix, which counteracted ascending pathogen invasion and subsequent inflammation and thereby delayed PTB. The present results suggest, that non-hormonal agents that reinforce the biochemical cervical barrier can be useful for the prevention of PTB in clinical practice.

BW Birth weight; CL Cervical length; IVH Intraventricular hemorrage; MMP Matrix metalloproteinase enzyme; NEC Necrotizing Enterocolitis; NICU Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; PTB Preterm Birth, PTL Preterm Labor, RDS Respiratory Distress Syndrome; ROP Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board for Medical Sciences in Stockholm in September 2007, No 2007-311-31. The trial was registered at the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT), that participates in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trial Registry Platform in September 2007, No 2007-003348-31, and was approved by the Swedish Medical Products Agency in May 2008, No 151:2008/30388. Ethics approval for the control group of women who were identified in retrospect was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board for Medical Sciences in Stockholm in April 2015, No 2014/255-31.

Consent for publication

The authors Giovanna Marchini, Tomislav Vladic and Ylva Vladic Stjernholm read and approved the manuscript.

Data availability

All data analyzed during this trial are included in this article and are available if requested.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

There was no funding.

Author contributions

GM and YVS planned and designed the study and collected the data. GM, TV and YVS analyzed the data, wrote and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank all women who participated, Therese Westerberg, nurse at the Neonatal Unit for retrieving neonatal data, professor Lars Hagenäs, Endocrinology Unit, Astrid Lindgren´s Children´s Hospital for valuable comments when planning this study, and the staff at the Obstetric, Neonatal and Operative Units at the Karolinska University Hospital for constructive collaboration.

Chawanpaiboon S, et al. Global, regional and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modeling analysis. The Lancet Global Health 7, E37 46, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0 (2019).
Cobo T, Kacerovsky M, Jacobsson B. Risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth. Int J Obstet Gynecol. 150, 17–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13184 (2020).
Norman J. Progesterone and preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 15, 24–30, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13187 (2020).
Vladic-Stjernholm Y, Wang H, Stygar D, Ekman G, Sahlin L. Differential regulation of the progesterone receptor A and B in the human uterine cervix at parturition. Gynecol Endocrinol. 18, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590310001651777 (2004).
Abelin-Törnblom S, et al. Non-infected preterm parturition is related to increased concentrations of IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1 in human cervix. J Reprod Biol Endocrinol 3, 39, https://doi.org 10.1186/1477-7827-3-39 (2005).
Dubicke M, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Mazurek P, Miller L, Yellon SM. Density of stromal cells and macrophages associated with collagen remodeling in the human cervix in preterm and term birth. J Reprod Sci. 2016;23:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115616497.
Fettweis J, et al. The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth. Nature Medicine. 2019;25:1012. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0450-2.
Haas D, Benjamin T, Sawyer R, Quinney S. Short-term tocolytics for preterm delivery – current perspectives. Int J Women’s Health 2014; 6, 343–349, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S44048 (2014).
Iams J, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine. New Engl J Med 334, 567–72, https://doi.org/ 10.1056/NEJM199602293340904 (1996).
Vladic Stjernholm Y, et al. Factors involved in the inflammatory events of cervical ripening in humans. J Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-2-74.
Schindler A, et al. Classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas 61, 171–80, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.11.013 (2008).
Norman J, et al. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2016;387:2106–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00350-0.
FIGO Working Group on best practice in maternal-fetal medicine. Best practice in maternal-fetal medicine. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 128, 80–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.011 (2015).
Kuusela P, et al. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of cervical length in the second trimester of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies, and the risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scan. 2015;94:598–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12622.
Borna S, Sahabi N. Progesterone for maintenance tocolytic therapy after threatened preterm labour: A randomised controlled trial. Austr New Zeal J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;48:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00803.x.
Pocock SJ. Clinical trials. Wiley & Sons, New York, US https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710270604 (1985).
Nuriel-Ohayon M, Neuman H, Koren O. Microbial changes during pregnancy, birth, and infancy. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1031. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01031.
Nold C, et al. Replens prevents preterm birth by decreasing type I interferon strengthening of the cervical epithelial barrier. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2019;83:e13192. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13192.
Su L, Samuel M, Chong Y. Progestational agents for treating threatened or established preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006770, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006770.pub3 (2014).
Arikan I, Barut A, Harma M, Harma IM. Effect of progesterone as a tocolytic and in maintenance therapy during preterm labor. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72:269–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000328719.
Sharami SH, Zahiri Z, Shakiba M, Milani F. Maintenance therapy by vaginal progesterone after threatened idiopatic preterm labor: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2010;4:45–50.
Facchinetti F, et al. Progestogens for maintenance tocolysis in women with a short cervix: a randomized controlled rrial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002065.
Shiba R, Kinutani M, Okano S, Kawano R, Kikkawa Y. Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial. Reprod Med Biol. 2020;19:42–9. doi. 10.1002/rmb2.12300.
McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:267–77. https//://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015.
Shapiro G, Fraser W, Frasch, Séquin J. Psychological stress in pregnancy and preterm birth: associations and mechanisms. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:631–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2012-0295.

Table 1. Patient characteristics.

Table 2. Maternal outcome.

Table 3. Neonatal outcome.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Progesterone Gel and Placebo were Equally Effective in Preventing Preterm Birth Among Women with Preterm Labor

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

List Of Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1