Clinical diagnosis, genetics and classification of AC patients.
The diagnosis of AC patients was compliance with the 2010 International Task Force Criteria by clinical and pathological evaluation10. Between 2005 and 2018, 24 heart transplantation (HTx) patients (13 males) were recruited whose electron microscope samples were collected. The clinical characteristics of AC patients was shown as Fig.1. The precordial leads electrocardiogram (Fig.1A) showed a repolarization abnormality that was characteristic of AC, with negative T waves in leads V1 through V5, besides premature ventricular beats was also seen. The cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and histopathology showed that right ventricle was dilated and the loss of right ventricular myocardium with the substitution of fibrous and fatty tissue. Each patient's diagnosis of AC is confirmed by pathology (Fig.1B-D). We identified the genetic background of these AC patients, 10 of 24 patients (26.7%) carried desmosomal gene mutations (PKP2 (1), DSP (3), DSG2 (5), DSC2 (1)), 8 of 24 patients (33.3%) was caused by non-desmosomal gene mutations (LMNA (2), PLN (3), DES (1), RYR2 (1) and CTNNA3 (1)), and the rest 6 patients did not carry any known gene mutations.
These 24 patients with AC were divided into DP group (n=10) and DN group (n=14). The detailed clinical characteristics were analyzed based on the two clusters (Table 1). The mean age of initial symptoms and HTx were similar between the two groups (DP vs DN, age of onset, 29.20 ± 14.84 yrs vs. 30.57 ± 9.29 yrs, p = 0.585. Age of Htx, 37.30 ± 15.81 yrs vs. 38.43 ± 11.91 yrs, p=0.843). The two groups had basically the same symptoms, both in clinical symptoms and in the occurrence of arrhythmias. Patients in both groups developed palpitations (DP vs. DN, 80.00% vs. 71.43%, p=1.000) and dyspnea (DP vs. DN, 70.00% vs. 85.71%, p=0.615) firstly, and half patients in either group had experienced symptoms of sustained ventricular tachycardia (DP vs. DN, 50.00% vs. 50.00%, p=1.000). In terms of ultrasound heart morphology, the two groups of patients had similar left atrium diameters (DP vs. DN, 32.90 ± 9.48 mm vs. 36.86 ± 8.27 mm, p=0.472), left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (DP vs. DN, 50.40 ± 12.78 mm vs. 54.14 ± 12.01 mm, p=0.471) and right ventricular end-diastolic diameters (DP vs. DN, 43.90 ± 14.36 mm vs. 38.64 ± 10.50 mm, p=0.310). There was also no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction between the two groups (DP vs. DN, 42.20 ± 19.41 % vs. 35.50 ± 12.88 %, p=0.319). In summary, the above results show that there is no obvious correlation between genetic background and clinical symptoms.
Intercalated discs differences between left and right ventricle in AC and donor hearts
To understand the ultrastructure differences between LV and RV, we compared the convolution index and three intercellular structures including D, gap junction (Gj), fascia adheres (FA). First, we compared the ultrastructural differences between LV and RV in normal donor hearts (Table 2). The D mean length (0.17 ± 0.01μm vs. 0.14 ± 0.01μm, p=0.001) and D percent length of intercalated disc (10.82 ± 3.12% vs. 6.75 ± 1.11%, p=0.001) of LV is significantly higher than that of the RV, respectively. It was indicated that the intercellular connection of LV is more stable and robust. Next, we compared the ultrastructural differences between LV and RV in AC hearts, but no differences were found between LV and RV in AC patients (Table 2). It suggested that the LV and RV may suffer from varying degrees of intercalated disc remodeling in AC. Therefore, we proceeded to investigate the differences in the left ventricle between AC and donor hearts, and the differences in the RV between AC and donor hearts, respectively. The mean D number per 10μm length (3.77 ± 1.58 per 10μm vs. 4.21 ± 1.76 per 10μm, p=0.001) and D percent length of intercalated disc (6.65 ± 2.77% vs. 10.82 ± 3.12%, p=0.001) was lower in LV of AC than in donor hearts. It is known that the hemodynamic pressure of the LV is significantly higher than that of the RV11. The high pressure in the LV may explain the loss of desmosomes in AC patients. Interestingly, we found that the mean Gj length was shorter in LV of AC than donor hearts (0.21 ± 0.13μm vs. 0.32 ± 0.16μm, p=0.047). The shorter gap junctions in LV of AC may be associated with arrhythmias12. The differences between AC and donor hearts in RV that the mean D length (0.17 ± 0.05μm vs. 0.14 ± 0.01μm, p=0.002), the D gap (21.38 ± 2.31nm vs. 18.09 ± 0.98nm, p=0.001) and the FA gap (23.89 ± 3.40nm vs. 22.07 ± 1.60nm, p=0.035) were significantly higher in AC than in normal hearts, and were accordance with the previous report7. This confirmed that not only the RV intercalated disc structure had changed in AC, but also the LV of AC patients had undergone intercalated disc remodeling, especially the changes of D structure.
Intercalated discs remodeling between DP group and DN group
To investigate whether the desmosomal remodeling was a specific change in patients with desmosomal mutations, we compared the structural changes of desmosomes between DP group and DN group (Fig2 A-C). We found the density (the mean D number per 10 μm) and proportion (D percent length of intercalated disc) of desmosomes in DP and DN group were significantly less than that of normal group, respectively, but no differences were not significate between DP and DN group (DP vs. DN vs. Normal, density, 3.61 ± 1.37 vs. 4.10 ± 1.75 vs. 6.35 ± 1.84, p=0.002, proportion, 6.38 ± 2.86% vs. 6.86 ± 2.80% vs. 10.82 ± 3.12%, p=0.003, Fig. 2D). In the RV, we could see compensatory broadening and lengthening of Ds in both DP and DN groups (Fig3 A-C), the length and width of desmosomes in DP and DN group were significantly higher than that of normal group. Similarly, the above difference did not exist between the DP and DN group (DP vs. DN vs. Normal, length, 0.17 ± 0.03μm vs. 0.18 ± 0.06μm vs. 0.14 ± 0.01μm, p=0.009, width, 20.94 ± 0.77 nm vs. 21.63 ± 2.84 nm vs. 18.09 ± 0.98 nm, p=0.001, Fig. 3D)
In a word, no statistically significant differences were found between DP and DN group, the remodelling of the desmosome structure had no correlation with the mutation of the desmosome genes.
Disintegrated D in patients with no known mutation
Among the AC patients in this study, there was 6 patients who didn’t carry any known mutations, but they had a clear diagnosis of ACM. We compared the D structures characters of these patient (Fig. 4A-B) with that of normal people. Whether in the LV or the RV, the density and proportion of D were lower in these 6 patients than that in the normal group (Fig. 4C). The optical intensity of D showed a noticeable paleness in the both ventricles of ACM patients with no known mutation. Parts of the intercalated discs have become blurred, and cell junction proteins were diffusely distributed in the intercellular space and cytoplasm around the cell membrane. Although these patients had no known mutations, their desmosome structure had been destroyed to varying degrees.
The proportion of D in LV are positively correlated with ST segment time in AC patients
To access the electrophysiological remodeling in relation to D loss, the following parameters were measured by surface ECG, including RR interval time, R wave peak time, ST segment time, QT interval time, Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5/V6), Cornell voltage (SV3 + RaVL). To calculate QTc from the uncorrected QT and heart rate, we followed the method as previously reported8. The relationship between D loss in both ventricles and 12-lead ECG parameters is shown in Table 3. We found no relationships between the proportion of D in RV and ECG parameters. Whereas, we find the proportion of D in LV are positively correlated with ST segment time, the fewer D, the shorter the ST segment time (Fig 5A). ST segment time is affected by heart rates (Fig 5B). To exclude the above difference was due to the difference in heart rates, we analyzed the correlation between RR interval time and the proportion of D in LV, and found no correlation between the two parameters (Fig 5C). The above results indicated that D loss may cause abnormal repolarization of the action potential plateau phase in AC patients.
Mitochondrial structure is not different between AC and donor hearts
To investigate the mitochondrial morphological changes in AC hearts, we proceeded to examine ultrastructural differences between donor and AC heart mitochondria (Fig. 6A-B). We measured mitochondrion density, cross-sectional area for each mitochondrion, and quantified cristae density by using mean optical density (range: 0–2.708), and we normalized them to myofilament optical density for each image. Because we measured hundreds of mitochondria per heart, we analyzed frequency distribution data with density profile. Fig 6C-F showed the density profile of mitochondrion area and mean relative optical density among AC patients and normal control, respectively. There was also no statistical difference in mitochondrial area between donor and failing AC hearts in both ventricle (LV average mitochondrial area: 0.25 ± 0.05 μm2 vs. 0.30 ± 0.03 μm2, p=0.332; RV average mitochondrial area: 0.34 ± 0.07 μm2 vs. 0.31 ± 0.02 μm2, p=0.603, Fig. 6C-D). Mean relative mitochondrial optical intensities were 1.25 ± 0.11 for donor mitochondria compared with 1.37 ± 0.09 for failing AC mitochondria in left ventricle (p=0.764; Fig. 6E), 1.24 ± 0.09 for donor mitochondria compared with 1.34 ± 0.06 for failing AC mitochondria in right ventricle (p=0.658; Fig. 6F), which indicated no differences in cristae density and mitochondrial swelling in both ventricles. In addition, average mitochondrial density was not different between donor and failing AC hearts in both ventricles (LV average mitochondrial density: 38.18 ± 3.21 per 100 μm2 vs. 41.88 ±3.01 per 100 μm2, p=0.464; RV average mitochondrial density: 34.29 ± 3.71 per 100 μm2 vs. 34.99 ± 3.24 per 100μm2, p=0.893, Fig. 6G-H).