Climate change has long been at the centerpiece of explanatory models of prehistoric demographic changes1,2,3,4,5. The last decade witnessed a renewed interest in this topic due to the ongoing climate crisis and the new opportunities offered by the increasing availability of paleoenvironmental proxies and large 14C datasets, used as demographic proxies6,7. Paleodemographic research based on 14C datasets, in particular, has benefited from substantial growth in the number of applications, most typically involving the use of the summed probability distribution of calibrated 14C dates (hereafter SPDs). Based on the assumption of a consistent correlation between the number of dates and the human population size, SPDs are now commonly utilized to examine past demographic processes8. Studies utilizing SPDs have stimulated an array of studies examining the relationship between climate changes and inferred prehistoric population changes, ranging from simple visual inspections of time-series to more complex statistical analyses and models9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16.
While these studies undoubtedly reveal a more nuanced picture of past human-climate relationships, SPDs and, more specifically, the assumption of ‘more dates–more people’ have also raised criticisms. These range from the interpretability of the proxies in relation to formation, taphonomic, and recovery processes to the wide range of statistical biases associated with the summation of 14C dates17,18,19,20. One such issue is the intrinsic uncertainty associated with these curves that arises from a combination of different errors, namely, sampling, radiometric measurement, and calibration. As a result, visual inspections of SPD values should be carried out with caution, and more importantly, ‘direct’ statistical analyses of SPD values should be avoided as they do not account for the different forms of uncertainties associated with the 14C data19,21,22.
Environmental proxies deployed in statistical comparisons with radiocarbon time-frequencies are also affected by their own chronological uncertainties. These are generally accounted for in age-depth models but rarely integrated as part of the final correlative analyses. As a result, the temporal relationship between particular trends in the demographic and the paleoenvironmental proxies (e.g. a population drop vs a cooling event) are never formally evaluated. The consequence of this lack of formality is observed when the close temporal proximity of climatic and demographic signatures are assumed to be sufficient to argue for a specific order — most typically the climatic event before the demographic one — and ultimately interpreted as evidence of a causal relationship. While to some extent such a prior belief can be justified, the extent of chronological uncertainties still needs to be accounted for, particularly if we wish to evaluate models that consider not just the temporal order but also the temporal distance between these events. The temporal distance between demographic and climatic events can reveal far more insights about adaptive responses and time-lags rather than simplistic models of climate-induced demographic processes (see for examples10,11).
This study investigates the relationship between climatic and demographic events occurring during the Chulmun period (10,000–3,500 cal. BP) in Korea by taking into account these specific challenges. Chulmun, referring to the incised decoration pottery, is a local term for the Neolithic. Chulmun is typically divided into six subphases, including the Incipient (10,000–8,000 cal. BP), Initial (8,000–6,500 cal. BP), Early (6,500–5,500 cal. BP), Middle (5,500–5,000 cal. BP), Late (5,000–4,000 cal. BP), and Final (4,000–3,500 cal. BP). Taking advantage of a wealth of 14C dates accumulated over recent decades due to increasing rescue excavations in Korea, several authors have already inferred the population dynamics of the Chulmun period using SPDs23,24,24,25. These studies mark an important juncture in Korean archaeology as pioneering studies that intensively utilized large available 14C datasets to reconstruct population trends during the Chulmun. Although each of these works have used different data filters on the 14C datasets and sometimes integrated additional population proxies such as the pithouse and settlement count (see for example24), they all agree on two large population trends. One is the general pattern of population growth toward the Middle Chulmun, while the other is the subsequent population toward the Late and Final Chulmun.
This study specifically focuses on the latter trend, the population decline phase toward the Late and Final Chulmun. Currently, the cause of this decline is attributed to the cooling climate occurring around 4,500 cal. BP. According to Ahn et al.24 and Ahn and Hwang26, the Chulmun population peaked by the Middle Chulmun due to the adoption of millet cultivation and sedentary lifestyle originated from the central-western inland region. However, the onset of cooling climate by the end of Middle Chulmun severely decreased the productivity of plant resources, particularly cultivated millets such as foxtail millet (Setaria italica) and broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum). Once millets stopped being a viable subsistence resource due to the deteriorating climate condition, Chulmun people abandoned their cultivation as well as the sedentary lifestyle, thereby triggering the observed population decline toward the Late and Final Chulmun. The evidential ground of this hypothesis rests on the two premises. Multiple paleoclimate proxies measured near and within the Korean peninsula indicate that a global scale cold/dry climate also occurred in Korea between 5,500 and 4,500 cal. BP. The number and scale of Chulmun settlements in many regions of Korea decreased in the Late/Final phase24.
The previous Chulmun population studies share a number of methodological shortcomings that make the evaluation of this hypothesis difficult. First, their methods of investigation are largely limited to the visual inspection of the trends in 14C data histograms and SPDs. As far as we are aware, Oh et al.25, is the only study that applied statistical testing to examine SPDs of the Korean peninsula, although their objective was simply to determine whether the inferred demographic curve deviated from an exponential growth. Second, while such null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) approach can highlight interesting fluctuations in the inferred demographic trajectories, it does not directly evaluate the potential impact of climatic events. Third, past studies do not incorporate spatial perspectives into the overall interpretations of the 14C data, thereby contributing to a unilinear narrative on the processes leading to population changes. In doing so, the past studies assume a ubiquitous process of population decline without considering the possibility that the population trend may vary by region. Fourth, despite the critical role of the decline of millet cultivation in this hypothesis, past studies often miss using the 14C data available on the charred millets in their analysis on Chulmun population trends.
Here we test the hypothesis on the climate-induced Chulmun population decline by filing the methodological gaps in the previous studies. We use a 14C dataset (n=683) from Chulmun sites in comparison with paleoclimatic data and dates associated with charred millets, then integrate a spatial dimension. If the hypothesis on a climate-induced population decline is supported, we expect to observe the following three patterns. First, the cooling climatic event would precede the population decline. Second, the population decline would be coupled with a significant decline in the relative frequency of 14C dates associated with millets. The decline of millet frequency would suggest that the population decline is closely tied with the failure of millet cultivation. Third, the rate and the timing of decline would be similar across the different regions of Korea. A regionally undifferentiated pattern of decline would validate the assumption that the hypothesized process leading to the population decline is applicable on a macro-regional scale.
To check our expectations, we first divide the 14C dataset into two regional groups, coastal and inland (Fig. 1). The SPD of the two regions is in line with the pattern demonstrated in the previous studies, which indicated a pattern of population growth toward the Middle Chulmun, followed by a decline in the Late/Final phase.
This regional grouping is chosen in recognition that the subsistence practices in the two regions were different prior to the Middle Chulmun. Chulmun occupations on the coast exhibited a long history of mobility-based strategy, consisting of residential mobility, where hunter-gatherer groups seasonally moved from one locality to another for subsistence practices (in sensu Binford27). The inland region, on the other hand, showed a strong tradition of large-scale sedentism that emerged in the Early Chulmun and intensified toward the Middle Chulmun24,28. We consider the possibility that the mobile hunter-gathering tradition, prevalent in the coastal regions before the Middle Chulmun, may have lingered and contributed to regional variations in the population decline pattern toward the Late/Final phase. To check this possibility, we fit a bounded double-exponential hierarchical Bayesian model22 to the 14C frequency data of the two regions. Fitted parameters of the double-exponential model provide the estimated rates of growth in the two regions, as well as the timing of when the population trend reversed from positive to negative growth rates. By comparing the fitted parameter to the timing of the abrupt cooling event based on two pollen sequences29,30 and the alkenone-based sea surface temperature reconstruction31, we aim to obtain a probabilistic estimate of the temporal order between a demographic decline and a cooling event. Finally, we compare the SPDs of all Chulmun dates against that of the dates associated with millet using the Mark-permutation test32 to determine whether and when the relative frequency of millet-associated dates changed over our window of analyses.