CpG-proBs protect against cGVHD: Assessment of cellular dose and therapeutic window
After induction, cGVHD went through an initial phase accompanied by diarrhea between day+2 and day+18 followed by a chronic stage from day+20 onwards, characterized by a second bout of diarrhea together with cutaneous manifestations. CpG-proBs were sorted as c-kit+Sca-1+B220lowPDCA-1−IgM− cells, as reported before [16] (Supplementary Fig. 1A). A dose of 105 CpG-proBs, previously shown to be effective in autoimmune settings, did not significantly reduce the severity of cGVHD, when the adoptive transfer took place the day following reconstitution (Supplementary Fig. 1B). To increase the amount of progenitors available for transfer, CpG-proBs were co-cultured with OP-9 stromal cells for 6 days. After a 10-fold expansion, on average, these progenitors were electronically sorted. They shared a similar phenotype with CpG-proBs that had not been expanded, except for the loss of c-kit expression, presumably resulting from the presence of its ligand SCF in the expansion medium (Supplementary Fig. 1C). When 7.5 x 105 CpG-proBs per recipient were injected on day+2 post-irradiation (DPI), they provided significant protection, as assessed by reduced diarrhea and less skin damage but no significant increase in survival compared to controls with cGVHD (Fig. 1). By contrast, the same number of non-activated pro-B cell progenitors freshly sorted from the bone marrow as c-kit+Sca-1−B220+CD24hiCD43hi cells (Supplementary Fig. 1C) and expanded in the same conditions had no such effect (Fig. 1). The same number of CpG-proBs adoptively transferred on day+9 conserved a reduced but still significant protection against disease symptoms, which was lost when injected on day+23 (Fig. 1).
CpG induced a strong upregulation of MHC class II, together with the co-stimulatory molecule CD80, as well as high CD40 expression on proB cell progenitors, thereby improving their capacity to interact with T-cells. There was no significant difference between CpG-proBs and their unstimulated counterpart, in terms of FasL expression, while PDL-1 was upregulated, compared with unstimulated controls, which did not display this molecule at significant levels (Supplementary Fig. 2A). However, the difference between CpG-proBs and proBs became less pronounced after expansion on the OP-9 cell layer. Finally, FACS analysis of PMA+ionomycin-activated proBs and expanded CpG-proBs revealed no significant difference between their cytokine expression profiles (GM-CSF, TNF-α, IL-10 and IFN-γ) (Supplementary Fig. 2B).
CpG-proBs migrate into peripheral organs where they differentiate
We took advantage of CpG-proBs derived from actin-GFP-KI mice to track their migration in recipients. On day+15, B220+GFP+ cells, gated as in Fig. 2A, represented 20-30% of all B cells analyzed and were detected exclusively in CpG-proB recipients, in mesenteric (mLN) and peripheral lymph nodes (pLN) as well as in the skin (Fig. 2B). Using a gating strategy based on relative expression of IgM, CD21, CD23 and CD93 [19–21] in all tissues examined, approximately 40% B220+GFP+ cells displayed a CD21lowCD23+CD93−IgM+ phenotype (Fig. 2C, D), similar to follicular B (FoB) cells, previously identified as the major CpG-proB progeny in NOD mice [15].
Cytokines are expressed in the peripheral CpG-proB progeny
Twenty to 80% B220+GFP+ cells expressed various cytokines, including IL-10, TGF-β, IFN-γ, GM-CSF, TNF-α and IL-27, compared with only 10-25% positive cells among the non-CpG-proB-derived B220+GFP− population. These observations suggest that the CpG-proB cell progeny is highly activated, especially in mLN, in which B220+GFP+ cells expressing these cytokines, notably IL-10 and TGF-β, were more frequent than in their pLN and skin counterpart (Fig. 2E, F).
CpG-proBs modulate cellular distribution and cytokine expression in cGVHD recipients
We analyzed the effect of adoptively transferred CpG-proBs on various recipient cell populations. On day+15, incidence and cell counts of CD4+ T cells or CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells were neither significantly different from controls nor did the cytokine expression by CD4+ T-cells in mLN and pLN change (Supplementary Fig. 3A, B). On day+25, once the chronic phase initiated, percentages of CD4+, CD4+Foxp3+ Treg and CD8+ T-cells as well as cell counts were not significantly modified (Fig. 3A, B). However the proportion of CD4+ T cells generating cytokines, such as TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-21 and IL-13, which are critically involved in chronic GVHD [22], was significantly reduced in mLN from CpG-proB recipients (Fig. 3C), while only IL-13-expressing CD4+ T cells were diminished in pLN (Fig. 3D). No significant difference was noted for IL-10 expression in CD4+ cells (Fig. 3C, D), while it was slightly but non-significantly enhanced in mLN CD8+ T-cells (Fig. 3E).
Adoptive transfer of CpG-proBs increases the Tfr/Tfh ratio
T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, counterbalanced by T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells, are known to play a key role in the germinal center (GC) reaction taking place in cGVHD [23, 24]. In addition, Bregs have been reported for interacting with both Tfh and Tfr subsets [25, 26]. This led us to examine how CpG-proBs and their progeny affected the balance between these two populations. TFh evaluation on day+15 disclosed no difference between GVHD controls and CpG-proB recipients (Supplementary Fig. 3C). Conversely, on day+25, the ratio between CD4+CXCR5+Foxp3+ follicular T regulatory cells (Tfr) and CD4+CXCR5+Foxp3− follicular helper T (Tfh) cells was markedly increased in both mLNs (Fig. 4A) and pLNs (Fig. 4B) of CpG-proB recipients relative to their counterpart in control mice undergoing cGVHD. Moreover, the percentage of Tfh cells expressing IL-10 was increased in mLN, while Tfh cells expressing IL-21 were diminished in pLN of mice having received CpG-proBs relative to untreated GVHD controls (Fig. 4C, D). Finally, percentages of CD19+GL7+CD38low GC B cells did not differ significantly in spleen and mLN (not shown).
The protection against cGVHD by CpG-proBs depends on IFN-γ production
IFN-γ plays a key role in the protective effect of CpG-proBs in autoimmune T1D [15] and EAE [16]. In GVHD mice, CpG-proBs and their migrated progeny expressed IFN-γ at similar levels, whatever the target tissue (Fig. 2E), which prompted us to evaluate its role in the cGVHD model. Using CpG-proBs isolated from IFN-γ-deficient mice, we found that graft recipients displayed exacerbated diarrhea and skin damage, compared with those having received WT CpG-proBs (Fig. 5A). This finding proved the importance of IFN-γ in the protection against cGVHD by CpG-proBs. The progeny of IFN-γ deficient CpG-proBs having migrated to the mLN did not express IFN-γ as expected, but also generated less IL-10, compared to its WT counterpart (Fig. 5B). Moreover, co-culturing peripheral and mesenteric lymph node cells isolated from naive mice with CpG-proBs significantly enhanced IL-10 expression in gated CD4+CXCR5+PD1+ Tfh cells, only when the progenitors were competent IFN-γ producers (Fig. 5C).
CpG-proBs reduce fibrosis and regulate gene expression and infiltrates in the skin
GVHD recipients of CpG-proBs developed less alopecia and skin damage (Fig. 6A right) compared with GVHD controls (Fig. 6A left). Histological analysis of H&E-stained skin sections recovered on day+70 revealed 50% reduced epidermal thickness (Fig. 6B), consistent with diminished skin fibrosis. qRT-PCR microarray expression profiles of genes involved in fibrosis and cytokine production (Fig. 6C) established that Col3a1 as well as of Pdgfa, a Col3a1 inducer implicated in fibrosis were downregulated in samples from CpG-proB recipients. The expression of Pdgfa, a known inducer of CXCR4 [27], which attracts fibrocytes to fibrotic tissues [28, 29] was likewise reduced in the skin of CpG-proB recipients. By contrast, thrombospondin-2 (thsb2, TSP-2), an anti-angiogenic matricellular protein that improves wound healing [30] was upregulated in CpG-proB recipients. The same applied to MMP9, which behaves like a collagenase [31] and can further regulate leukocyte infiltration into inflammatory tissues [32] by inactivating a number of chemoattractants. However, neither total immune cell nor T-cell infiltration was significantly different between GVHD controls and CpG-proB recipients on day+15 or day+42 (Fig. 6D). The enhanced IL12rb expression suggested a proTh1 effect of CpG-proBs on skin infiltrates, possibly controlling the deleterious Th2-driven fibrotic process. This conclusion was in keeping with the observed decrease in IL-13 expression by CD4+ T-cells in the lymph nodes. Increased Stat6 expression in CpG-proB recipients (Fig. 6D) was intriguing, knowing that this signal transducer can mediate skin fibrosis [33]. However, this upregulation might result from increased expression of IL-33, which occurs upstream of IL-13 [34]. Of note, IL-33 can substitute for IL-2 as an inducer of tissue ST2+ Treg expansion [35]. Although the proportions of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs and CD4+IL-10+ Tr1 cells were not significantly increased in skin infiltrates, as measured by FACS analysis (Fig. 7), IL-10-expressing CD8+ T cells, reported for their ST-2 expression and responsiveness to IL-33 [36], markedly accumulated in the skin of CpG-proB recipients, both on day+15 and day+42, while total CD8+ T-cell counts and percentages remained unchanged (Fig. 7).
The proportion of IL-10 producers increased also among the B220+PDCA-1− B subset as early as day+15, while on day+42, both B220+PDCA-1− B cells and CD11c+CD11b+ dendritic cells expressing IL-10 accumulated (Fig. 7). During cGVHD, macrophages stimulated by Fc immunoglobulin fragments contribute to fibrosis by releasing TGF-β. Csf1r was enhanced in the microarray analysis of skin samples from CpG-proB recipients. However, FACS analysis of the skin cell infiltrate revealed that cell counts, percentages as well as IL-10 production by F4/80+CD11b+ macrophages remained unchanged on day+42 (Supplementary Figure 4). Moreover, microarray analysis detected no significant difference between Arg and iNOS expression. In mice, CSF1R is expressed by monocytes/macrophages, but also by conventional and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. However, the observed incremental increase in conventional (Fig. 7) and plasmacytoid dendritic cell percentages and IL-10 expression (Supplementary Fig. 5) did not reach statistical significance. A late accumulation of csf1r+ cells in the skin analyzed on day+70, compared to the flow cytometry analysis performed on day+42, cannot be excluded.
Collectively, the analysis of skin samples and infiltrates revealed that the histological effects of CpG-proBs resulting in reduced skin damage, including fibrosis, epidermal thickness and collagen accumulation. These findings correlated with immune tolerance evidenced by enhanced infiltration by IL-10-expressing DCs, CD8+ T cells and B cells. The two latter populations were first to accumulate in the skin.