Household Survey: Out of the 806 households surveyed, there were 203 HHs with children aged 6-23 months, 200 HHs had children aged 24-59 months and 403 HHS had PLW. All the mothers (99.6%) in the catchment area were aware of the collection points for the food supplements, most (78%) received food supplements during the previous month, whereas a fifth of HHs (22%) did not food supplements in the previous month. The major reasons for not receiving the food supplement were that the mothers either forgot to collect (10%) or were busy in household work (5%), in very few cases the mothers visited the health house but the food supplements were not available (5%) (Table 3).
Table 3: Receipt of food supplements
Total
|
N (%)
806 (100)
|
Proportion of mothers aware of delivery points
|
803 (99.6)
|
Any food supplements received in the previous month
|
626 (77.7)
|
Not receiving food supplements
|
180 (22.3)
|
Forgot to receive/visit LHW’s health house
|
83 (10.3)
|
Busy in household work
|
44 (5.4)
|
Visited but supplements not available
|
39 (4.8)
|
Visited but LHW was absent
|
6 (0.7)
|
Other
|
8 (1.0)
|
However of those who received supplies, not all received the full stock of supplements – only 50% of households had received the full stock for LNS, 61% for MNP, 63% for WSB at the time of survey (Table 4). The supplements were often shared with other members of the household. LNS supplies were shared with other household members in 45% of eligible households, WSB in 34% of households and MNPs in 13% of households. However eligible individuals did not always consume food supplements in required dose. Amongst eligible beneficiaries who consumed the supplement only 20% used the full dose of LNS, 30% took the full does of WSB and 32% took the full dose of MNP. At the same time knowledge of correct use and dose was fairly high. Most mothers (80%) were aware of the correct dose of LNS and WSB, and all (100%) were aware of the correct method of LNS and WSB consumption. Comparatively fewer mothers (64%) knew the correct dosage of MNP although most (80%) knew how to correctly use MNP.
Table 4: Knowledge and compliance with food supplement dosage
Variable
|
LNS (children aged 6-23 months)
N (%)- 203 (100)
|
MNP (children aged 24-59 months)
N (%) - 200 (100)
|
WSB (PLW)
N (%)- 403 (100)
|
Knowledge of correct dose
|
165 (81.2)
|
127 (63.5)
|
334 (82.8)
|
Knowledge of correct method of preparation
|
203 (100)
|
159 (79.5)
|
403 (100)
|
Full monthly quota of supplement received
|
101 (49.7)
|
122 (61.0)
|
253 (62.7)
|
Partial or no supplement received
|
102 (50.3)
|
78 (39.0)
|
150 (37.3)
|
Sharing of supplement with other HH members
|
88 (45.0)
|
25 (13.0)
|
129 (33.6)
|
Use of supplement by eligible individual
Full dose of supplement used
Partial or no dose of supplement used
|
108 (55.0)
42 (20.7)
161 (79.3)
|
174 (87.0)
63 (31.5)
137 (68.5)
|
255 (66.4)
121 (30.0)
282 (70.0)
|
FGDs with Community:
Value of Food Supplements: Most caregivers did not perceive stunting as a health concern. They commonly believed that stunting occurs because the parents of an individual are of short height or that God had ordained a person’s height. LNS supplements were believed to be associated with greater ‘physical strength’ and ‘energy’ for people of all age groups. WSB was regarded by some caregivers to positively impact the child’s health at birth, while others regarded this as an extra bag of ration. Caregivers were willing to use supplements only if provided free of cost. Only a few reported that they are ready to pay a token amount for these food supplements with higher willingness to pay for WSB and lowest for MNP. Willingness to pay (WTP) reported by participants was up to forty rupees for WSB; ten rupees for LNS; and maximum three rupees for MNP for a single pack of the supplement. Caregivers reported that they would not be interested in purchasing food supplements and believed it would be more beneficial to spend their money on other rations such as cooking oil and wheat, which could feed the entire family instead of selected groups. Participants stated that they would not mind using WSB and LNS if provided free of cost.
It’s [Stunting] natural for children because it depends on parents’ heights. If parents are smaller, their children will also be small” (LM)
“It [WSB] is good thing and gives physical strength [energy] to the pregnant and lactating women” (PW).
Receipt of Food Supplements: Most mothers knew that the LHWs health houses were the collection point for the food supplements and where these were located. However, mothers reported that they do not always get the full stock of supplies when approaching LHWs. Sometimes they were unable to pick up the supplements due to household chores, instead sending their children or spouse to pick up the supplies. However husbands and children often do not interact with LHWs, at other times stop to listen to the LHWs instructions on its use and benefits. Mothers expressed stated that LHWs distributes supplies in a hurry and there is less chance to understand why the supplements should be used. They also mentioned that although LHWs do make household visits, growth monitoring of child is rarely carried out and there is little discussion on food supplement use.
“ …, I don’t get the food supplement every time, as she [LHW] says stock has finished and asks us to wait for a few days.” (LM)
“We should sit together with her [LHW] to discuss about the use and benefits of the supplements and other issues.” (PW)
“Sometimes I send my son or daughter to receive food supplements from LHW house” (LM)
Acceptability of Food Supplements: Information about the acceptability of the food supplements was probed based on their colour, texture, odour, and packaging. Participants expressed strong like for the taste and texture of WSB although they were indifferent about its colour, odour and packaging. Participants believed that all family members were entitled to consume WSB. The preferred use was through mixing with wheat flour to make chappatis served at meals. Participants enthused over the taste of LNS considering it to have a “chocolate” flavour and syrupy liquid texture. Caregivers were largely hesitant of MNP usage and also reported that children did not adequately take to it. It was believed that the powder changed the colour and taste of the food that it was sprinkled over hence turning off children from consuming their meals. Some caregivers also expressed that children experienced bouts of diarrhoea after consuming MNPs.
“WSB tastes good when prepared and mixed with anything; people like it.” (LM)
“Wawa Mum (LNS) is good for children’s health. It gives them energy.” (LM)
“The taste of [MNP] is not liked by children. It changes color of certain food products.” (Grand-mother)
“I think Wawamum is little chocolate so ten rupees is fine price for it and even then many people will not buy; people will say it was given for free and must remain free of cost” (Spouse)
“…yes because its taste is good, so all children have it and they are happy to have Wawa Mum” (PW)
“All members have it [WSB when it is prepared and mixed in flour [aata] and meal [mani] is made of it.” (LM)
Usage of Food Supplements: Sharing of WSB and LNS was commonly reported among the household members. WSB was usually served to all household members mixed in chappatis (bread) for daily meals. Caregivers felt that it was culturally unacceptable for mothers to consume separate chappatis made of WSB flour. Caregivers also considered that there was extra work involved to make two different sets of dough and chappatis (bread). LNS was reported to be popular amongst children and adults due to its taste and this led to consumption by older siblings and sometimes even by adults. Most caregivers felt that they it would be unfair to restrain older children from having a chocolaty treat. MNP was not shared due to perceived unpleasant taste and issue of food changing colour when sprinkled with MNP.
FGDs with LHWs:
Community uptake: LHWs reported that households were always willing to receive extra food parcels, however expressed concern that food sharing was common and hence the target groups did not always receive the adequate amount of the food supplements. LHWs believed that village-level committees comprised of influential and educated people from the community would be helpful in ensuring that the right beneficiaries consume food supplements.
Food supplement delivery: LHWs were concerned that substantial time was required in maintaining records of supplements and counselling of households on supplement use. LHWs complained that they did not get sufficient time from usual chores to attend to these tasks. They also felt demoralised that there tasks kept on increasing and there was little support available from their supervisors. LHWs also mentioned delays in re-stocking of supplements which they attributed to be a major reason for households not being able to obtain full stock of supplements. According to LHWs their transport allowance was meagre to regularly fetch supplies while on the other hand there was rising demand from the community for WSB and LNS.
“We don’t get salary and food distribution incentive on time.” (LHW)
“At village level there should be committees of influential people who can look after the proper usage and also help us in distribution, otherwise people will continue to demand food supplements for the ineligible ones” (LHW)
KIIs with district stakeholders:
Community uptake of food supplements: KIs expressed concerns that community is poorly aware of the importance of food supplements and that the critical step prior to food distribution should have been to sufficiently sensitize the community on why to use and who should use. KIs reported that certain segments of the community believed that these supplements are supplied by foreign agencies with malicious intent, hence awareness is all the more required to dispel suspicions. KIs largely felt that community does not get sufficient interaction with LHWs, with interaction being mostly confined to Polio days, and this was reported as another hindrance to adequate uptake of food supplements. They believed that LHWs should be re-established as primary care givers with community, particularly with women, this would then also help with supplement use for children and mothers.
Delivery of food supplements: There was also concern amongst key informants on record keeping of distribution and usage of food supplements, and many expressed their desire for regular review of such record. LHS blamed low literacy of LHWs for weak record keeping, yet others believed that record keeping has less to do with competency and more with insufficient emphasis given so far to monitoring. While all key informants recognised that monetary support is required for regular delivery of supplements to health worker houses in the villages, there was less consensus on why monetary support is not delivering results so far. LHS supervisors were wont to blame slow release of transport allowance to LHWs, whereas the district health office distributing food supplements stated that transport allowance were often withheld until monitoring reports were submitted by health workers. Stakeholders doubted that LHW are adequately trained to deliver awareness to the community and stated that community awareness requires considerable support.
“There should be trust of people on her [LHW] but it is only possible when she performs her duties honestly, she only comes for polio drops, and doesn’t come otherwise.”
“There are some religious leaders who misguide people and say that it is western wrold tactics to provide these supplements to us which are mixed up with some [haraam] prohibited food/things.”
“There is also issue that a large number of beneficiaries don’t realize that this program is for their good, there is a need of educating the people more on that.”
“Although there are some issue of capacity of LHWs. The LHW has the vital role in this program. She better knows about the situation in the community, she even knows about the number of pregnant women as well as the new born babies.”
“There are some LHWs who are weak at maintaining records; we need to solve this issue on priority basis.”
“Many LHWs don’t submit monthly reports on time but still demand timely provision of incentives and this is not possible that they can get incentive without submission of timely monthly reports.”
Table 5: Summary of key findings (To be inserted at the end of the results section-line 380)
|
Value of Supplements
|
Distribution of Supplements
|
LHWs
|
Acceptability
|
Usage of Supplements
|
Value of Supplements
|
HH Survey
|
|
|
-Supplement not available
-majority of mothers were aware of delivery points
|
-LHW absent at health house
|
|
|
-Target groups did not receive adequate amounts
|
Community Perceptions: FGDs with Family Members
|
|
-Stunting not viewed as a problem- seen as genetic and God’s will/natural
Mothers could see improvement in child’s growth post-supplements
|
-Information on usage not provided to family members who collected supplements
|
-Correct usage technique only taught to mothers by LHWs
LHWs hurried the sharing of information
|
-WSB- taste and texture liked by PLW; seen as source of energy and provided physical strength
-LNS- children liked chocolatey taste
-MNP- changed the colour of food and taste, so was not liked by target population (or otherwise).
|
-Lack of trust regarding government intervention
-Village elders volunteered to play a positive and productive role in promotion and encourage use of food supplements in their community
|
- LNS and WSB were shared by household members
|
Healthcare Provider Feedback: FGDs with LHWs
|
|
|
-Supplements not restocked due to transport allowance issues
-Male members of the households that come to collect supplements do not wish to stay and learn about usage technique or dosage.
|
-LHWs felt overwhelmed by multiple tasks
-Expressed need for support by LHSs
|
-Need for village level committee to supervise education and distribution of supplements by elders and educated community members
|
Demotivating factors affecting usage:
-lack of time, supplies, oversight, skills, trainings and support by
LHSs
|
-Concerned regarding target groups not receiving adequate amounts due to sharing of supplements
|
District Stakeholders Feedback: KIIs
|
|
-Benefits of supplements to alleviate stunting not understood
|
-Transport allowance is not regularly provided for restocking and transport of supplements
|
-LHSs stated that LHWs need more education and training on community awareness
Poor record keeping by LHWs
|
|
-LHWs focused more on anti-polio drives and family planning
Multiple commitments make it difficult to effectively run supplement program
|
|