The World Health Organization (WHO) listed air pollution and climate change among the top threats to global health (WHO, 2019[1]). A recent study estimated that a global total of 10.2 million premature deaths annually are attributable to the fossil-fuel component of PM2.5 (Vohra, et al., 2021[2]). Many studies have reported a strong relation between air pollution and illness as a foundation for policy recommendations to protect people’s health. Studies showed air pollution contributed to an increase of outpatient visits of eighteen diseases, from physical diseases such as COPD, asthma, diabetes, and heart disease, to mental diseases such as anxiety, and accidents (Chau and Wang, 2020[3]; Filleul et al., 2004[4]).
Air pollution disproportionately affects people in various socioeconomic groups. In the area of social determinants of health, research has found that social characteristics, such as age, gender, income inequality, and education, are related to the inequality of health and mortality (Berkman, Kawachi and Glymour, 2014[5]; Marmot and Wilkinson, 2005[6]). Air pollution also disproportionately affects different age groups. The elderly is more susceptible to air pollution (Simoni et al., 2015[7]). For the elderly, long-term studies have shown that air pollution causes additional increases in mortality, and these increases are even greater among socially disadvantaged elders (Costa et al., 2017[8]; Bateson and Schwartz, 2004[9]; Qiu et al., 2015[10]; Cakmak et al., 2011[11]; Deryugina et al., 2019[12]). It has also been shown that air pollution increases disease morbidity and hospitalizations for cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and respiratory diseases in the elderly (Chuang et al., 2011[13]; Chen et al, 2018[14]; Schikowski, et al., 2010[15]). Hence, air pollution increases the burden of health care. Previous studies have shown a strong relationship between air pollution and medical care may include only the elderly, and therefore it is difficult to know whether their health status is different from other groups (Fuchs and Frank, 2002[16]; Birnbaum et al., 2020[17]).
Taylor (2000)[18] suggested treating the environmental injustice of air pollution as a social issue, because it involves policy making and implementation thereby creating an analytical framework to address disadvantages. This study used the concept of intersectionality, which was first introduced in the social sciences to criticize the single axes of social disadvantages, and provide an analytical framework to understand multiple oppressions, discrimination and disadvantages encountered by black women (Crenshaw, 1989[19]). This concept has been flourishing in social sciences, and recently Bowleg (2021)[20] proposed that the intersectionality framework could be useful to public health, allowing public health researchers to enhances their understanding of multiple oppressions and disadvantages in health inequity (Alvarez, 2021[21]; Bauer, 2014[22]; Bowleg, 2008[23]). Hence, this study tests the concept of intersectionality to understand how multiple intersections (air pollution and ageing) impact the use of medical care, instead of solely axis (i.e., age or air pollution).
Less use of medical care is beneficial to the governmental health insurance, as well an individual’s finances. With national databases from Taiwan, this study investigates the potential benefit from pollution reduction from a health policy perspective, which is the decrease in the use of medical care.