Lung cancer is classified into NSCLC and SCLC according to its pathological features [19]. Among them, NSCLC is divided into three forms histologically: adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma [20, 21]. Also, the smoking has high death rate in one of the most important causes by lung cancer [1]. A major clinical problem associated with lung cancer is the acquired resistance of tumors to chemotherapy [22], with NSCLC patients having a 5-year survival rate of less than 20% [23]. In clinical practice, approximately 20% of NSCLCs are operable, but the 5-year survival rate remains low despite advances in chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for inoperable cases (7%–20%), and the recurrence rate remains high in 30%–50% [24]. However, the 5-year survival rate for localized disease is 59% [25]. From these knowledges, novel therapeutic strategies are required to overcome cancer recurrence, metastasis, and resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy.
The concept of CSCs was introduced in 1977 and was an extremely interesting topic in cancer research [26]. CSCs are an exceedingly rare population among the entire cancer cell population (less than 1% for most solid tumors) that exhibits high tumorigenicity [27]. At first, CSCs were recognized as cancer-initiating cells because they are thought to be the basic cause or species of cancer [4, 28]. However, in reality, the characteristics of CSCs include self-renewal, differentiation capability, high infiltration and migration properties, high tumorigenicity, and resistance to chemotherapy [29]. In short, the main CSC properties are as follows: (a) unique self-renewal ability to produce the daughter cells with the same stem cell characteristics (similar to normal stem cells); (b) the ability to differentiate into a variety of cancer cell lines and promote cell proliferation and overall tumor survival; and (c) high tumorigenic potential to expand and create non-CSC strains and form new tumors. Until now, CSCs of various cancer types including lung cancer were discovered through specific cell-surface proteins by large number of research groups [30].
In this study, we revealed that cases expressing ALDH1A1 had much worse OS than ALDH1A1-negative cases when ALDH1A1 alone was examined, but there was no significant difference in DFI. ALDH (a detoxifying enzyme that oxidizes intracellular aldehydes) is a member of a group of enzymes that protect stem cells from oxidative damage by causing the oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids [31]. So far, ALDH1 expression has been assessed for the identification of CSCs in several cancer types including leukemia and breast, neural, head and neck, colon, liver, and lung cancer [32]. In addition, ALDH1 converts retinol to retinoic acid, which causes stem cell differentiation and proliferation in the early stages [33]. Furthermore, ALDH1A1 expression has been shown to be related with resistance to chemotherapy [34, 35]. Finally, a recent meta-analysis revealed that increased ALDH1A1 expression is associated with poor OS and disease-free survival in lung cancer patients [36].
In the current study, we revealed that CD133-expressing cases had a much worse DFI than CD133-negative cases when CD133 alone was investigated, but there was no significant difference in OS. CD133 is an 865-amino acid penta-span transmembrane protein that has been accepted as a principal marker of stemness in several solid tumors [37]. Some previous studies have shown that human lung cancer contains CD133-positive CSCs that can self-renew and have high tumorigenicity [38]. In addition, the expression of CD133 in NSCLC is associated with the degree of cell differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and prognosis [39]. Furthermore, CD133 expression is negatively correlated with the prognosis of patients with lung cancer because lung tumors containing CD133-positive cells are resistant to cisplatin [40]. Therefore, CD133 expression is a marker for lung CSCs. Our previous study revealed that immunohistological CD133 expression was correlated with the pathological stage of human adenocarcinoma, especially stage I+II disease. Apart from these, various studies suggested that CD133 may have an important role in regulating the expression of CSC genes by interacting with several signaling pathways. However, further investigations are necessary to understand possibility of CD133 in CSC regulation [41].
In this study, there was no clear significant difference in mutant p53 expression between OS and DFI, but mutant p53-expressing cases tended to have a poorer prognosis than negative cases. TP53 encodes the protein consisting of 393 amino acids (p53) in short arm of chromosome 17, which acts as a transcription factor that regulates the expression of other genes. And wild-type p53 has the role of suppressing the accumulation of mutant cells through the induction of apoptosis, giving anticancer drug sensitivity and radiosensitivity [42, 43]. Furthermore, the DNA binding site of p53 is a hotspot for point mutations that result in changes to its three-dimensional structure that inhibit the binding of p53 to its target DNA, and loss of transcriptional activity indicates loss of its tumor suppressor function [44, 45]. To date, various studies have revealed that abnormal p53 expression may promote the initiation and progression of CSCs [46, 47], and activation of mutant p53 was found to increase tumorigenicity by promoting symmetric self-renewal division and inhibiting macrophage accumulation [48]. Although these studies suggested that p53 could be a barrier to CSC formation, the precise mechanism by which p53 regulates CSC survival and tumorigenesis remained unclear. Other than the above, somatic mutations of TP53 occur frequently during the development of human neoplasia, and because mutant p53 proteins are often much more stable than wild-type p53 protein, mutant p53 accumulates to a high level [49].
Various studies have shown the association between ALDH and CD133, including the following: NSCLC cells with relatively high ALDH1 activity are characterized by their increased ability to proliferate, self-renew, differentiate, and express CD133 CSC marker [50, 51]. Furthermore, Jiang et al. found that ALDH expression was associated with the decreased survival of patients with stage I NSCLC and reported a high association between CD133 and ALDH1 expression. This suggests that these proteins are markers for the same tumor cell population [52].
Regarding the association between CSCs and p53, a study by Hilla et al. showed that overexpression of ALDH1A1 in colorectal cancer was associated with reduced apoptosis, which indicated the involvement of ALDH1A1 in the mediation of mutant p53-dependent chemotherapy resistance [53]. An in vitro study, wild-type p53 was also described to suppress CD133 expression transcriptionally in colon cancer. In addition, the tumor-suppressive effect of wild-type p53 in some cancer cell lines needed p53-mediated CD133 inhibition [54]. These results guessed that CD133 may be a potential target for tumor inhibition in highly tumorigenic cancers with impaired p53 function [55].
In this study, double-negative (ALDH1A1−/CD133−) cases had a much better DFI than others, but there was no significant difference in OS. Furthermore, triple-negative (ALDH1A1−/CD133−/p53−) cases had a notably better prognosis than other cases.
In conclusion, lung adenocarcinoma negative for mutant p53 was presumed to have a good prognosis, but when the expression of mutant p53 was investigated in combination with CSC markers, the prognosis of these patients was better with statistical significance. These results suggest that mutant p53 expression may promote the expression of CSC markers and CSC activity in lung adenocarcinoma. Thus, CSC markers and mutant p53 may be effective targets in therapeutic strategies for lung adenocarcinoma. However, these functions have not yet been clarified completely and require further research. In future studies, we will elucidate the detailed mechanism involved and verify other CSC markers.