DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-95003/v1
Background: Stem cells have been applied in the treatment of OA, which had attracted wide attention. However, the research area is relatively extensive, and the research level is variable. In this study, we reviewed the mechanisms and clinical applications of stem cells in OA by using bibliometric analysis for the first time. We also revealed the characteristics, superior results and developmental trends in this field.
Methods: The Web of Science core collection database was used to search articles related to the application of stem cells in OA. We collected the general information from the top 100 cited articles. We analyzed and evaluated the articles according to publication number, journals, institutions, countries, keywords and extended keywords.
Results: The 100 most cited articles were cited from 129 to 1353 times mainly reviews and original articles. These articles were published from 2001 to 2017 and distributed evenly in America, East Asia and European countries. The United States contributed most in published number and international cooperation. The top ten institutions are mainly major universities and Duke University published a maximum of 10 articles. In terms of journals ,57 articles were published in the top ten journals. The keywords were divided into 8 categories from molecular mechanisms to clinical application.
Conclusions: In our study, we found that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which could repair articular cartilage and inhibit local inflammation, are the most widely applied in research and treatment of OA. TGF-βwas crucial during the process. Exosomes are regarded as the active ingredients in stem cell therapy for OA. Microtissue engineering will contribute to accurate and effective stem cell therapy. The findings of our study will contribute to the continuous development of research and direct the research of stem cells in OA.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease associated with the aging of the population, an increasing number of obese people, and participation in sports, which reduces the quality of life of patients1. According to statistics, OA is the fourth most common cause of reduced physical function in the world. It is characterized by the destruction of articular cartilage and abnormal proliferation of osteophytes, and it produces pathological variation, joint pain, limited mobility and joint deformities as clinical manifestations. At present, traditional methods of intervention for osteoarthritis, such as functional exercises, physical therapy, lifestyle changes and the use of analgesics, which are the first choices for treatment, can only temporarily relieve symptoms but cannot improve the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis or reverse the process of osteoarthritis2. For more serious cases, joint replacement surgery is required; this method can be useful, but it is not suitable for young patients with a large amount of activity3. A consensus can be reached that joint degeneration and local inflammation are regarded as important factors leading to OA based on current studies4,5. The key to successful treatment of osteoarthritis is cartilage regeneration and the control of local inflammation. The research of treatment methods will focus on these two aspects.
Stem cells, which are a kind of seed cell with multiple differentiation potentials, have shown their advantages in the treatment of osteoarthritic cartilage lesions in recent years. In addition to their differentiation potential, stem cells can also secrete a variety of enzymes and nutritional factors to participate in the paracrine process, including growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines that play a role in anti-apoptosis, anti-fibrosis, antioxidation, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenesis promotion. In particular, autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from bone marrow, adipose tissue and umbilical cord have the potential to differentiate into cartilage. However, there are many types of stem cells, and the efficacy of different types remains to be compared. In addition, modifying stem cells based on the type and degree of OA can greatly improve the effect of treatment.
Bibliometric analysis is a cross-disciplinary approach using mathematical and statistical methods to analyze the quantity and quality of publications6. In view of the effect of stem cell therapy in clinical prevention and treatment of OA, this study aimed to discuss the role of stem cells in osteoarthritis and attempt to direct the research for the first time according to the bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles. The results can be used to evaluate the research status and predict the developmental trend of the application of stem cells in OA.
The relevant articles were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection database according to the indexes: immune and osteoporosis on July 30, 2020. The time range of retrieval covered all years, that is, from the year that the database had the records. There were a total of 1164 publications and the types of them included review, article, proceedings paper, editorial material and book chapter, etc. Then we established inclusion criteria and screened in accordance with it. The criteria included: (a) language of English, (b) osteoporosis involving in research, (c) focus on the discussion of immune modulation. Selected articles were sorted according to the number of citations and the 100 most cited ones were screened after sorting.
The above operations were performed by two reviewers independently and a third reviewer would help them build consensus when disagreements occurred. The general information of these articles was listed including the title, publication date, name of the first author and corresponding author, geographic origin, publication journal, publication institution, research theme, and journal impact factor.
The extracted information of these 100 articles were imported into the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology (http://bibliometric.com/) and integrated according to their characteristics. CiteSpace V5.5.R1 SE, 64bit (Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and VOSviewer (Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands) were used to visualize the network of these information, such as authors and counties, institutions and journals7,8. Meanwhile, we also concluded research trends and predicted evolutional directions in terms of high-frequency keywords on CiteSpace.
Paired t-tests and one-way ANOVA of variance were performed for statistical analysis of at least three times experiments using SPSS. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The 100 most cited articles were collected according to the number of times cited number in the WoS core and sorted in descending order and included 65 articles (one of the articles was also a proceedings paper) and 35 reviews (Table 1). The number of citations ranged from a maximum of 1353 times to a minimum of 129. We collated the general information for these articles including the publication year, authors, journal, institutions and countries and examined the article characteristics by using bibliometric analysis.
Rank | Article Title | Document Type | Corresponding author | Cited Reference Count | Times Cited, WoS Core | Publication Year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects | Review | Hunziker, EB | 462 | 1353 | 2002 |
2 | Osteoarthritis | Review | Goldring, MB | 105 | 818 | 2007 |
3 | Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis | Article | Barry, FP | 62 | 678 | 2003 |
4 | Human autologous culture expanded bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation for repair of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic knees | Article | Wakitani, S | 29 | 635 | 2002 |
5 | Inflammatory networks during cellular senescence: causes and consequences | Review | Freund, A | 77 | 596 | 2010 |
6 | The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis pathogenesis | Review | Scanzello, CR | 112 | 425 | 2012 |
7 | Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage | Review | Athanasiou, KA | 113 | 400 | 2015 |
8 | Regeneration of the articular surface of the rabbit synovial joint by cell homing: a proof of concept study | Article | Mao, JJ | 38 | 382 | 2010 |
9 | Chondrogenic differentiation and functional maturation of bovine mesenchymal stem cells in long-term agarose culture | Article | Tuan, RS | 65 | 378 | 2006 |
10 | Cartilage homeostasis in health and rheumatic diseases | Review | Goldring, MB | 217 | 377 | 2009 |
11 | Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling in mesenchymal stem cells of subchondral bone attenuates osteoarthritis | Article | Cao, X | 61 | 374 | 2013 |
12 | Intra-Articular Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial | Article | Yoon, KS | 84 | 369 | 2014 |
13 | Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells? | Article | Im, GI | 41 | 359 | 2005 |
14 | The knee meniscus: Structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration | Review | Athanasiou, KA | 291 | 358 | 2011 |
15 | Reduced chondrogenic and adipogenic activity of mesenchymal stem cells from patients with advanced osteoarthritis | Article | Barry, F | 38 | 318 | 2002 |
16 | In vitro cartilage tissue engineering with 3D porous aqueous-derived silk scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells | Article | Kaplan, DL | 70 | 311 | 2005 |
17 | Chondrocyte hypertrophy and osteoarthritis: role in initiation and progression of cartilage degeneration? | Review | van der Kraan, PM | 134 | 307 | 2012 |
18 | Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment | Article | Elisseeff, JH | 36 | 294 | 2017 |
19 | A Stem Cell-Based Approach to Cartilage Repair | Article | Johnson, K | 35 | 290 | 2012 |
20 | Hydrogel design for cartilage tissue engineering: A case study with hyaluronic acid | Article | Burdick, JA | 118 | 290 | 2011 |
21 | The Role of Growth Factors in Cartilage Repair | Article | Fortier, LA | 96 | 287 | 2011 |
22 | Oxygen and reactive oxygen species in cartilage degradation: friends or foes? | Review | Henrotin, Y | 128 | 283 | 2005 |
23 | The effect of nanofiber alignment on the maturation of engineered meniscus constructs | Article | Mauck, RL | 54 | 274 | 2007 |
24 | Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells and their induction to a chondrogenic phenotype | Article | Guilak, F | 68 | 268 | 2010 |
25 | Treatment of a full-thickness articular cartilage defect in the femoral condyle of an athlete with autologous bone-marrow stromal cells | Article | Kuroda, R | 20 | 260 | 2007 |
26 | Enumeration and phenotypic characterization of synovial fluid multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells in inflammatory and degenerative arthritis | Article | McGonagle, D | 41 | 254 | 2004 |
27 | ROLES OF INFLAMMATORY AND ANABOLIC CYTOKINES IN CARTILAGE METABOLISM: SIGNALS AND MULTIPLE EFFECTORS CONVERGE UPON MMP-13 REGULATION IN OSTEOARTHRITIS | Article | Goldring, MB | 208 | 247 | 2011 |
28 | Osteophytes: relevance and biology | Review | van der Kraan, PM | 70 | 230 | 2007 |
29 | Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis. Preliminary report of four patients | Article | Davatchi, F | 17 | 227 | 2011 |
30 | Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Pilot Study | Article | Garcia-Sancho, J | 51 | 225 | 2013 |
31 | Identification and Specification of the Mouse Skeletal Stem Cell | Article | Chan, CKF | 31 | 218 | 2015 |
32 | Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Allogeneic Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized Controlled Trial | Article | Garcia-Sancho, J | 46 | 216 | 2015 |
33 | A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair | Review | Schmidt, MB | 29 | 215 | 2006 |
34 | Cartilage tissue engineering: its potential and uses | Review | Tuan, RS | 95 | 211 | 2006 |
35 | Identification of new susceptibility loci for osteoarthritis (arcOGEN): a genome-wide association study | Article | Zeggini, E | 37 | 209 | 2012 |
36 | Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis | Article | Di Martino, A | 33 | 209 | 2011 |
37 | Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: comparison of 2D and 3D cultures | Article | Welting, TJM | 58 | 208 | 2012 |
38 | Infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis | Article | Choi, YJ | 45 | 207 | 2012 |
39 | MicroRNA-124a Is a Key Regulator of Proliferation and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Secretion in Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes From Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis | Article | Kawano, S | 50 | 207 | 2009 |
40 | Migratory Chondrogenic Progenitor Cells from Repair Tissue during the Later Stages of Human Osteoarthritis | Article | Miosgel, N | 51 | 205 | 2009 |
41 | Chondrocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells sequentially exposed to transforming growth factor-beta 1 in monolayer and insulin-like growth factor-I in a three-dimensional matrix | Article | Nixon, AJ | 64 | 203 | 2001 |
42 | Increased Knee Cartilage Volume in Degenerative Joint Disease using Percutaneously Implanted, Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells | Article | Busse, D | 58 | 201 | 2008 |
43 | Mesenchymal stem cells in arthritic diseases | Review | Tuan, RS | 88 | 200 | 2008 |
44 | Injectable mesenchymal stem cell therapy for large cartilage defects - A porcine model | Article | Hui, JHP | 40 | 199 | 2007 |
45 | Update on the biology of the chondrocyte and new approaches to treating cartilage diseases | Review | Goldring, MB | 163 | 195 | 2006 |
46 | Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis | Review | Loeser, RF | 113 | 193 | 2016 |
47 | Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections Improve Symptoms of Knee Osteoarthritis | Article | Choi, YJ | 29 | 193 | 2013 |
48 | Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats | Article | Qin, L | 58 | 189 | 2016 |
49 | Tissue engineering of functional articular cartilage: the current status | Review | Ito, K | 196 | 189 | 2012 |
50 | Mesenchymal stem cells in joint disease and repair | Review | Barry, F | 104 | 188 | 2013 |
51 | Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Delivered via Intra-Articular Injection to the Knee Following Partial Medial Meniscectomy A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study | Article | Vangsness, CT | 21 | 187 | 2014 |
52 | Mesenchymal stem cells: innovative therapeutic tools for rheumatic diseases | Review | Noel, D | 85 | 185 | 2009 |
53 | Comparison of mesenchymal tissues-derived stem cells for in vivo chondrogenesis: suitable conditions for cell therapy of cartilage defects in rabbit | Article | Sekiya, I | 29 | 184 | 2008 |
54 | Therapies from Fucoidan; Multifunctional Marine Polymers | Review | Fitton, JH | 128 | 182 | 2011 |
55 | Effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem and regenerative cells on lameness in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis of the coxofemoral joints: A randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, controlled trial | Article | Black, LL | 47 | 182 | 2007 |
56 | Combined effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 and transforming growth factor-beta 1 on periosteal mesenchymal cells during chondrogenesis in vitro | Article | O'Driscoll, SW | 71 | 179 | 2003 |
57 | Technology Insight: adult mesenchymal stem cells for osteoarthritis therapy | Review | Tuan, RS | 63 | 177 | 2008 |
58 | Osteoblast physiology in normal and pathological conditions | Review | Cantatore, FP | 189 | 176 | 2011 |
59 | Antiinflammatory and chondroprotective effects of intraarticular injection of adipose-derived stem cells in experimental osteoarthritis | Article | van Lent, PLEM | 38 | 174 | 2012 |
60 | Higher chondrogenic potential of fibrous synovium- and adipose synovium-derived cells compared with. subcutaneous fat-derived cells - Distinguishing properties of mesenchymal stem cells in humans | Article | Sekiya, I | 42 | 174 | 2006 |
61 | Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration | Article | Toh, WS | 15 | 172 | 2016 |
62 | Proinflammatory cytokines inhibit osteogenic differentiation from stem cells: implications for bone repair during inflammation | Article | Lacey, DC | 40 | 170 | 2009 |
63 | Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Based Therapy for Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial | Article | Jorgensen, C | 27 | 161 | 2016 |
64 | Bioactive Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants-Recent Trends in Development of Implant Coatings | Review | Choong, PFM | 303 | 159 | 2014 |
65 | Synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells in health and early osteoarthritis - Detection and functional evaluation at the single-cell level | Article | Jones, EA | 36 | 158 | 2008 |
66 | Evaluation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction or Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Osteoarthritis | Article | Frisbie, DD | 32 | 157 | 2009 |
67 | The structural architecture of adult mammalian articular cartilage evolves by a synchronized process of tissue resorption and neoformation during postnatal development | Article | Hunziker, EB | 41 | 157 | 2007 |
68 | Progress in intra-articular therapy | Review | Evans, CH | 96 | 155 | 2014 |
69 | Intra-articular Injected Synovial Stem Cells Differentiate into Meniscal Cells Directly and Promote Meniscal Regeneration Without Mobilization to Distant Organs in Rat Massive Meniscal Defect | Article | Sekiya, I | 36 | 154 | 2009 |
70 | Cartilage tissue engineering for degenerative joint disease | Review | Mainil-Varlet, P | 218 | 154 | 2006 |
71 | Self-crosslinked oxidized alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage regeneration | Article | Banerjee, R | 56 | 153 | 2014 |
72 | Platelet-rich plasma for managing pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis | Review | Maffulli, N | 113 | 153 | 2013 |
73 | TGF-beta signaling in chondrocyte terminal differentiation and osteoarthritis Modulation and integration of signaling pathways through receptor-Smads | Review | van der Kraan, PM | 92 | 153 | 2009 |
74 | Mesenchymal progenitor cell markers in human articular cartilage: normal distribution and changes in osteoarthritis | Article | Lotz, MK | 65 | 153 | 2009 |
75 | Degradable hydrogel scaffolds for in vivo delivery of single and dual growth factors in cartilage repair | Article | Jansen, JA | 57 | 151 | 2007 |
76 | Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model | Article | Zhang, CQ | 65 | 148 | 2017 |
77 | Basic science and clinical application of platelet-rich plasma for cartilage defects and osteoarthritis: a review | Review | Peng, J | 86 | 148 | 2013 |
78 | Tissue engineering for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A review of current strategies | Review | McAllister, DR | 94 | 147 | 2006 |
79 | Adipose-derived adult stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering | Article; Proceedings Paper | Guilak, F | 75 | 146 | 2004 |
80 | Impact of Aging on the Regenerative Properties of Bone Marrow-, Muscle-, and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells | Article | Darling, EM | 65 | 145 | 2014 |
81 | Tissue engineered ceramic artificial joint - ex vivo osteogenic differentiation of patient mesenchymal cells on total ankle joints for treatment of osteoarthritis | Article | Ohgushi, H | 27 | 145 | 2005 |
82 | Cartilage tissue engineering using differentiated and purified induced pluripotent stem cells | Article | Guilak, F | 49 | 142 | 2012 |
83 | Enhanced Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Low Oxygen Environment Micropellet Cultures | Article | Doran, MR | 86 | 142 | 2010 |
84 | Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review | Review | Schaer, TP | 118 | 142 | 2009 |
85 | Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Six Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis | Article | Eslaminejad, MB | 32 | 141 | 2012 |
86 | Chondrogenic potential of human adult mesenchymal stem cells is independent of age or osteoarthritis etiology | Article | Stoop, R | 36 | 140 | 2007 |
87 | Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis | Review | Majumdar, AS | 47 | 139 | 2012 |
88 | Hypoxic conditions increase hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 2 alpha and enhance chondrogenesis in stem cells from the infrapatellar fat pad of osteoarthritis patients | Article | Hardingham, TE | 52 | 139 | 2007 |
89 | The Role of Changes in Extracellular Matrix of Cartilage in the Presence of Inflammation on the Pathology of Osteoarthritis | Review | Nam, J | 100 | 137 | 2013 |
90 | INFLAMMATORY AND CATABOLIC SIGNALLING IN INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS: THE ROLES OF NF-KB AND MAP KINASES | Article | Wuertz, K | 153 | 137 | 2012 |
91 | Activation and dedifferentiation of chondrocytes: Implications in cartilage injury and repair | Review | Schulze-Tanzil, G | 98 | 137 | 2009 |
92 | Cartilage Repair in a Rat Model of Osteoarthritis Through Intraarticular Transplantation of Muscle-Derived Stem Cells Expressing Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 and Soluble Flt-1 | Article | Huard, J | 50 | 135 | 2009 |
93 | Current research on pharmacologic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis | Review | Xu, JK | 142 | 133 | 2016 |
94 | Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: Focus on articular cartilage and intervertebral disc regeneration | Article | Mobasheri, A | 196 | 132 | 2016 |
95 | The effect of platelet rich plasma combined with microfractures on the treatment of chondral defects: an experimental study in a sheep model | Article | Milano, G | 66 | 132 | 2010 |
96 | Tissue engineering through autologous mesenchymal stem cells | Review | Jorgensen, C | 48 | 132 | 2004 |
97 | Animal models of osteoarthritis: classification, update, and measurement of outcomes | Review | Laurencin, CT | 340 | 131 | 2016 |
98 | Composite Three-Dimensional Woven Scaffolds with Interpenetrating Network Hydrogels to Create Functional Synthetic Articular Cartilage | Article | Liao, IC | 50 | 130 | 2013 |
99 | Macromer density influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis and maturation in photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels | Article | Mauck, RL | 43 | 130 | 2009 |
100 | 3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration | Article | Haglund, L | 53 | 129 | 2015 |
In the 1990s, the discussion about stem cells and osteoarthritis was initiated. Initially, more attention was devoted to the role played by hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiated immune cells in osteoarthritis9,10. Figure 1 showed that the publication years of the 100 most cited articles were unevenly distributed from 2001 to 2017. The years in which more than 10 publications were published in 2009 (13, ranked first), 2012 (12, ranked second) and 2007 (10, ranked third). In general, the level of published articles was relatively higher in the two periods from 2006 to 2009 and from 2011 to 2013. In 2009, the FDA approved Geron Pharmaceuticals' application for a Phase I clinical trial (IND) for the treatment of spinal injury using oligodendrocyte precursors (GRNOPC1) differentiated from stem cells. This was the first demonstration of the clinical safety and effectiveness of pluripotent stem cells and led to the clinical application of stem cells. In 2012, the article “Replenishing Cartilage from Endogenous Stem Cells” was published in The New England Journal of Medicine, pioneered the treatment of osteoarthritis by autologous stem cell transplantation and it was widely discussed11.
The top ten most active countries were according to the number of publications each year are shown in Fig. 2. Unsurprisingly, America ranked first with a total of 49 articles and always maintained an absolute lead over the others. The development in this field has been relatively balanced worldwide. In East Asia, Japan published 9 articles during 2002–2009, and research in South Korea and China developed rapidly from 2012 to 2017. The representatives of Europe were the Netherlands (n = 10), Germany (n = 7), England (n = 6) and Italy (n = 6). In addition, there were five articles published by groups from Australia. International cooperation was also dominated by the United States. Japan and the United Kingdom also accounted for a large proportion in the network (Fig. 3). According to the article number, we listed the top 10 institutions (Fig. 4). Duke University ranked first with 10 articles. Tokyo Medical & Dental University, University of Pennsylvania and Johns Hopkins University ranked second, third and fourth with 9, 8 and 7 articles, respectively. Otherwise, Harvard University, Stanford University published 6 articles and the National University of Singapore, Brown University, University of Manchester, and Charite published 5 articles.
We counted the authors who were the first or corresponding authors of the 100 articles and ranked in descending order of the published article count for the top ten authors (Table 2). Mauck RL published the most articles (n = 5), one as the first author and two as the corresponding author. Five authors published 4 articles: Goldring MB, Tuan RS, Guilak F, Noel D and Jorgensen C. The other four authors, Hunziker EB, Barry F, van der Kraan, PM and Diekman BO published 3 articles. The top ten cocited authors were listed in Table 3 in descending order of the article count. CiteSpace was used to reveal the network of these cocited authors (Fig. 5). Pittenger MF published 30 articles with 0.07 centrality index. Four cocited authors published over 20 articles, Caplan AI (n = 25), Murphy JM (n = 24), Wakitani S (n = 21) and Hunziker EB (n = 21). The centrality index for Caplan AI was 0.22, whereas that for the other three was 0.07.
Rank | Author | Article counts | First author counts | Corresponding author counts |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Mauck, RL | 5 | 1 | 2 |
2 | Goldring, MB | 4 | 4 | 4 |
3 | Tuan, RS | 4 | 0 | 4 |
4 | Guilak, F | 4 | 1 | 3 |
5 | Noel, D | 4 | 0 | 1 |
6 | Jorgensen, C | 4 | 1 | 2 |
7 | Hunziker, EB | 3 | 2 | 2 |
8 | Barry, F | 3 | 1 | 2 |
9 | van der Kraan, PM | 3 | 3 | 3 |
10 | Diekman, BO | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Rank | Co-cited author | Article counts | Centrality index |
---|---|---|---|
1 | PITTENGER MF | 30 | 0.07 |
2 | CAPLAN AI | 25 | 0.22 |
3 | MURPHY JM | 24 | 0.07 |
4 | WAKITANI S | 21 | 0.07 |
5 | HUNZIKER EB | 21 | 0.07 |
6 | BRITTBERG M | 19 | 0.21 |
7 | BUCKWALTER JA | 17 | 0.15 |
8 | GOLDRING MB | 17 | 0.14 |
9 | GUILAK F | 14 | 0.04 |
10 | JOHNSTONE B | 13 | 0.03 |
The top ten journals were listed in descending order of the number of published articles (Table 4). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage published 20 articles, which was the highest number and accounted for 35% of the total of 57 articles published by the ten journals. The second ranked journal was Arthritis and Rheumatism, which published 8 articles. Both of the top two journals were journals specializing in joints. In addition, three quarters of the journals belonged to Q1 and Q2 according to the Quartile in Category and the impact factor of four articles was over 10 points. An article published in Nature Medicine had an impact factor of 36.23, and another article published in The Lancet had an impact factor of 60.392, which reflected the authority of these articles.
Rank | Journal | Article counts | Impact factor | Quartile in Category |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Osteoarthritis And Cartilage | 20 | 4.793 | Q2 |
2 | Arthritis And Rheumatism | 8 | 4.751 | Q2 |
3 | Nature Reviews Rheumatology | 6 | 16.625 | Q1 |
4 | Biomaterials | 5 | 10.317 | Q1 |
5 | Stem Cells | 4 | 6.022 | Q2 |
6 | Arthritis Research & Therapy | 4 | 4.103 | Q2 |
7 | Nature Medicine | 3 | 36.23 | Q1 |
8 | Cell And Tissue Research | 3 | 4.044 | Q3 |
9 | Journal Of Orthopaedic Research | 2 | 2.728 | Q3 |
10 | Lancet | 2 | 60.392 | Q1 |
A total of 215 keywords were extracted and were listed in Table 5. The number of occurrences of keywords ranged from 5 to 187 times. Though VOSviewer analysis, these items were classified into 8 clusters which were shown in Fig. 6A. Each cluster had a common theme: cluster 1 (52 items, in red, pathogenesis), cluster 2 (46 items, in green, clinical follow-up), cluster 3 (40 items, in blue, molecular mechanism), cluster 4 (30 items, in yellow, stem cell application), cluster 5 (19 items, in purple, animal experiment), cluster 6 (15 items, in cyan, treatment method), cluster 7 (12 items, in orange, action of the exosome) and cluster 8 (1 item, in brown). Top five keywords of each cluster were listed as follows and the number of occurrences is indicated:
Keywords | cluster | Links | Total link strength | Occurrences | Average publishing years | Average citations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3D Culture | 3 | 44 | 286 | 7 | 2011.571 | 197.8571 |
Ability | 4 | 132 | 586 | 14 | 2010.571 | 205.8571 |
Addition | 1 | 83 | 181 | 5 | 2009.6 | 242.8 |
Adipose Synovium | 4 | 44 | 526 | 9 | 2006.778 | 176.1111 |
Adverse Event | 2 | 84 | 387 | 9 | 2013.889 | 211.6667 |
Age | 4 | 140 | 1121 | 29 | 2010.517 | 182.6552 |
Angiogenesis | 5 | 80 | 311 | 7 | 2011.286 | 184 |
Animal | 2 | 98 | 532 | 11 | 2009.636 | 286.7273 |
Animal Model | 1 | 63 | 460 | 15 | 2011.733 | 193.5333 |
Application | 4 | 126 | 628 | 16 | 2009.688 | 180.75 |
Arthritis | 1 | 71 | 349 | 11 | 2006.546 | 231.8182 |
Articular Cartilage | 1 | 180 | 1899 | 47 | 2010.553 | 245.4255 |
Articular Cartilage Defect | 2 | 93 | 492 | 12 | 2005.833 | 369.5833 |
Articular Cartilage Layer | 1 | 17 | 390 | 10 | 2007 | 157 |
Articular Injection | 2 | 76 | 473 | 10 | 2012.9 | 198.3 |
Ascs | 5 | 57 | 402 | 10 | 2012 | 209 |
Atmscs | 3 | 26 | 282 | 6 | 2005 | 359 |
Beta | 3 | 72 | 452 | 11 | 2009.909 | 247.4545 |
Biology | 1 | 88 | 322 | 12 | 2008.25 | 205.6667 |
Bmp | 5 | 34 | 348 | 6 | 2009 | 135 |
Bmsc | 4 | 26 | 185 | 5 | 2012 | 139 |
Bone | 3 | 134 | 790 | 21 | 2009 | 253.1905 |
Bone Marrow | 4 | 151 | 1125 | 26 | 2008 | 216.1538 |
Bone Marrow Msc | 4 | 74 | 349 | 7 | 2010.143 | 184.1429 |
Capacity | 4 | 148 | 863 | 21 | 2007.191 | 266.6667 |
Cartilage | 1 | 189 | 3132 | 80 | 2010.263 | 237.4125 |
Cartilage Damage | 1 | 94 | 275 | 8 | 2009.25 | 227.25 |
Cartilage Defect | 2 | 112 | 825 | 20 | 2009.25 | 250 |
Cartilage Homeostasis | 1 | 68 | 220 | 6 | 2007.833 | 294.3333 |
Cartilage Quality | 2 | 27 | 337 | 7 | 2013.857 | 221.1429 |
Cartilage Regeneration | 4 | 110 | 482 | 10 | 2010 | 211.7 |
Cartilage Repair | 5 | 142 | 1003 | 24 | 2009.375 | 332.5 |
Cartilage Tissue Engineering | 6 | 103 | 534 | 14 | 2007.143 | 268.8571 |
Cell | 4 | 204 | 7456 | 187 | 2008.412 | 229.8021 |
Cell Proliferation | 3 | 104 | 484 | 11 | 2007.727 | 244.3636 |
Cell Therapy | 4 | 83 | 220 | 5 | 2009.6 | 163.8 |
Challenge | 6 | 123 | 569 | 16 | 2010.125 | 194.8125 |
Change | 1 | 152 | 1272 | 31 | 2011.452 | 250.7419 |
Chondrocyte | 1 | 174 | 2654 | 66 | 2009.727 | 258.697 |
Chondrocyte Differentiation | 1 | 29 | 144 | 7 | 2009.429 | 172.5714 |
Chondrogenesis | 3 | 136 | 1779 | 41 | 2006.902 | 209.0488 |
Chondrogenic Differentiation | 5 | 110 | 366 | 8 | 2007.75 | 199.375 |
Chromosome | 1 | 13 | 145 | 5 | 2012 | 209 |
Colony | 4 | 80 | 404 | 8 | 2006.125 | 188.75 |
Combination | 5 | 124 | 664 | 15 | 2008.4 | 199.4 |
Comparison | 2 | 95 | 438 | 9 | 2009.556 | 176.7778 |
Control | 1 | 136 | 704 | 17 | 2011.118 | 220.3529 |
Control Group | 2 | 80 | 339 | 7 | 2011.143 | 256.1429 |
Culture | 3 | 165 | 2069 | 48 | 2006.25 | 263.2917 |
Cytokine | 1 | 104 | 445 | 11 | 2009.182 | 283.7273 |
Damage | 1 | 127 | 468 | 12 | 2009.833 | 239.1667 |
Day | 5 | 97 | 778 | 17 | 2008.765 | 175.1765 |
Defect | 2 | 131 | 1383 | 31 | 2010.129 | 218.3871 |
Degeneration | 1 | 132 | 643 | 17 | 2010.588 | 283 |
Degenerative Joint Disease | 1 | 80 | 307 | 9 | 2009.667 | 214.4444 |
Delivery | 6 | 119 | 701 | 17 | 2009.294 | 259.7059 |
Development | 1 | 158 | 1527 | 48 | 2011.083 | 253.875 |
Difference | 3 | 113 | 438 | 10 | 2009.3 | 240.8 |
Differentiation | 3 | 159 | 1185 | 32 | 2008.594 | 223.6562 |
Disability | 2 | 100 | 461 | 11 | 2014.273 | 208.1818 |
Disease | 1 | 146 | 1163 | 34 | 2010.853 | 248.4706 |
Donor | 4 | 97 | 589 | 12 | 2006.5 | 225 |
Ecm | 1 | 84 | 450 | 11 | 2010.273 | 174.7273 |
Effect | 5 | 194 | 2207 | 49 | 2010.367 | 194.1224 |
Efficacy | 2 | 86 | 651 | 13 | 2015 | 203 |
Evaluation | 2 | 105 | 651 | 14 | 2010.429 | 235.7143 |
Evidence | 2 | 140 | 674 | 14 | 2010.071 | 292.4286 |
Exo | 7 | 24 | 280 | 5 | 2017 | 148 |
Exosome | 7 | 44 | 728 | 14 | 2016.643 | 156.5714 |
Expression | 3 | 156 | 1307 | 31 | 2010.097 | 194.0968 |
Extracellular Matrix | 1 | 107 | 430 | 11 | 2012.091 | 194.0909 |
Factor | 1 | 155 | 1361 | 37 | 2010.135 | 288.8108 |
Feasibility | 2 | 62 | 325 | 7 | 2012.714 | 231.1429 |
Fibrous Synovium | 4 | 20 | 513 | 9 | 2006 | 174 |
Field | 6 | 68 | 172 | 6 | 2008.667 | 219.5 |
Focus | 1 | 65 | 186 | 5 | 2013.2 | 200.8 |
Formation | 5 | 169 | 1249 | 30 | 2010.467 | 217.2667 |
Fucoidan | 1 | 13 | 75 | 5 | 2011 | 182 |
Function | 1 | 158 | 1162 | 30 | 2009.467 | 245.9667 |
Gag Content | 3 | 38 | 205 | 5 | 2011.4 | 192.4 |
Group | 2 | 152 | 1820 | 39 | 2009.949 | 215.4615 |
Growth Factor | 3 | 159 | 1792 | 44 | 2008.068 | 253.1818 |
Growth Factor Beta | 3 | 103 | 361 | 8 | 2007.25 | 242.875 |
Horse | 8 | 39 | 261 | 6 | 2007.667 | 164.6667 |
Human | 4 | 95 | 294 | 6 | 2008.5 | 289 |
Hyaline Cartilage | 2 | 102 | 321 | 7 | 2010.143 | 280.5714 |
Hydrogel | 6 | 78 | 564 | 17 | 2011.471 | 195.7647 |
Hypoxia | 3 | 59 | 274 | 6 | 2006.833 | 187.5 |
Identification | 1 | 68 | 171 | 5 | 2008.6 | 183 |
Igf | 3 | 69 | 819 | 18 | 2004.167 | 182.5556 |
Iliac Crest | 4 | 67 | 200 | 5 | 2005.8 | 212.8 |
Immunohistochemistry | 3 | 83 | 263 | 5 | 2007.2 | 169.4 |
Improvement | 2 | 96 | 674 | 14 | 2011.643 | 233 |
Increase | 3 | 115 | 445 | 12 | 2009.25 | 236.8333 |
Induction | 5 | 88 | 359 | 9 | 2008.444 | 377 |
Inflammation | 1 | 128 | 866 | 23 | 2010.783 | 262.0435 |
Infrapatellar Fat Pad | 2 | 56 | 349 | 7 | 2010.857 | 183.5714 |
Injection | 2 | 99 | 913 | 20 | 2011.8 | 192.5 |
Insulin | 3 | 92 | 449 | 9 | 2004.778 | 221.2222 |
Intra Articular Injection | 2 | 113 | 665 | 14 | 2012.714 | 210.5 |
Intraarticular Injection | 5 | 85 | 289 | 6 | 2010.667 | 254.8333 |
Ipfp | 3 | 26 | 306 | 6 | 2007 | 139 |
Joint | 6 | 149 | 1210 | 30 | 2008.833 | 267.2333 |
Joint Disease | 1 | 107 | 400 | 10 | 2011 | 341.5 |
Joint Tissue | 1 | 51 | 222 | 6 | 2012.167 | 378.3333 |
Knee | 2 | 145 | 1657 | 38 | 2010.579 | 253.1316 |
Knee Joint | 5 | 67 | 311 | 7 | 2008.286 | 411.7143 |
Knee Osteoarthritis | 2 | 93 | 699 | 14 | 2012.357 | 244.8571 |
Level | 2 | 155 | 852 | 20 | 2010.05 | 202 |
Ligament | 5 | 60 | 365 | 11 | 2007.727 | 250 |
Local Delivery | 6 | 66 | 153 | 5 | 2010.2 | 265.4 |
Magnesium | 3 | 16 | 192 | 8 | 2016 | 189 |
Marker | 3 | 114 | 724 | 15 | 2008.267 | 179.9333 |
Matrix | 4 | 157 | 1213 | 29 | 2009.586 | 199.2759 |
Mdsc | 5 | 34 | 399 | 7 | 2009 | 135 |
Mean | 2 | 89 | 283 | 6 | 2010.5 | 188.5 |
Mechanical Property | 6 | 92 | 389 | 11 | 2008.364 | 250 |
Mechanism | 1 | 137 | 858 | 22 | 2011.091 | 271.4091 |
Medial Femoral Condyle | 2 | 55 | 252 | 6 | 2006.667 | 291 |
Mesenchymal Stem Cell | 4 | 193 | 3333 | 76 | 2009.303 | 219.3158 |
Microfracture | 2 | 19 | 378 | 7 | 2010 | 132 |
Migration | 7 | 88 | 413 | 8 | 2013.5 | 187.5 |
Mir | 7 | 35 | 254 | 6 | 2011.667 | 187.3333 |
Model | 1 | 140 | 953 | 25 | 2009.76 | 262.68 |
Molecule | 3 | 112 | 579 | 15 | 2011.2 | 181.6 |
Month | 2 | 112 | 1160 | 24 | 2010.125 | 207.9167 |
Mri | 2 | 81 | 344 | 7 | 2011.571 | 219.2857 |
Mrna Expression | 3 | 55 | 318 | 7 | 2009 | 194.2857 |
Msc | 4 | 172 | 3619 | 86 | 2009.826 | 208.3721 |
Mscs | 4 | 150 | 1753 | 46 | 2008.674 | 203.3043 |
Muscle | 4 | 98 | 440 | 9 | 2008.444 | 228.2222 |
Musculoskeletal Disorder | 4 | 72 | 267 | 6 | 2015 | 139.8333 |
Normal Cartilage | 2 | 62 | 270 | 5 | 2010 | 199 |
Notch | 3 | 21 | 300 | 6 | 2009 | 153 |
Number | 3 | 155 | 936 | 22 | 2008.364 | 260.3182 |
Oa Joint | 1 | 65 | 232 | 7 | 2011.143 | 215 |
Osteoarthritis | 1 | 202 | 4647 | 127 | 2010.976 | 242.3543 |
Osteogenesis | 3 | 69 | 337 | 8 | 2010.625 | 246.375 |
Osteogenic Differentiation | 3 | 48 | 220 | 6 | 2010.667 | 172.1667 |
Osteophyte | 1 | 14 | 110 | 5 | 2007 | 230 |
Osteophyte Formation | 1 | 44 | 155 | 5 | 2007.4 | 211 |
Oxygen | 3 | 46 | 326 | 8 | 2005.5 | 247 |
Pain | 2 | 154 | 1657 | 38 | 2012.395 | 221.7895 |
Parameter | 2 | 107 | 462 | 10 | 2010.6 | 184.4 |
Pathogenesis | 1 | 99 | 508 | 14 | 2011 | 403 |
Pathology | 1 | 76 | 387 | 9 | 2013.444 | 236 |
Pathway | 1 | 114 | 531 | 17 | 2010.471 | 174.4118 |
Patient | 2 | 163 | 3917 | 92 | 2010.794 | 212.25 |
Pellet | 4 | 95 | 486 | 11 | 2009.182 | 163.9091 |
Pellet Culture | 3 | 80 | 294 | 7 | 2008 | 238.5714 |
Periosteum | 3 | 92 | 278 | 7 | 2008.429 | 254.4286 |
Phenotype | 1 | 143 | 882 | 24 | 2008.875 | 278.625 |
Platelet Rich Plasma | 2 | 98 | 520 | 11 | 2011.818 | 179.1818 |
Point | 2 | 50 | 524 | 10 | 2012.8 | 198.4 |
Potential | 4 | 161 | 1645 | 36 | 2008.889 | 188.8611 |
Presence | 1 | 91 | 387 | 9 | 2009 | 203.7778 |
Procedure | 2 | 111 | 407 | 10 | 2010.3 | 228.6 |
Process | 1 | 151 | 1186 | 32 | 2010.188 | 250.625 |
Production | 3 | 139 | 824 | 19 | 2007.474 | 215.7368 |
Progenitor Cell | 6 | 113 | 502 | 13 | 2007.692 | 220.1538 |
Progression | 1 | 65 | 430 | 11 | 2012.455 | 184.6364 |
Proliferation | 7 | 140 | 1094 | 23 | 2010.217 | 193.2174 |
Proteoglycan | 3 | 77 | 212 | 5 | 2008.8 | 172 |
Prp | 2 | 79 | 777 | 18 | 2011.889 | 155.2778 |
Quality | 2 | 79 | 282 | 6 | 2010.667 | 211.3333 |
Ra Synoviocyte | 7 | 16 | 165 | 5 | 2009 | 207 |
Range | 2 | 95 | 443 | 10 | 2010.2 | 224 |
Rat | 3 | 66 | 328 | 8 | 2012.375 | 173.125 |
Rat Model | 5 | 67 | 357 | 6 | 2012.833 | 145.5 |
Regeneration | 6 | 158 | 1761 | 40 | 2010.9 | 242.95 |
Regenerative Therapy | 4 | 54 | 156 | 5 | 2014.8 | 137.2 |
Regulation | 1 | 78 | 282 | 9 | 2010 | 244 |
Repair | 3 | 179 | 1591 | 40 | 2009.325 | 293.85 |
Research | 1 | 115 | 627 | 19 | 2010.895 | 239.3158 |
Review | 1 | 143 | 954 | 30 | 2009.6 | 255.3667 |
Rheumatoid Arthritis | 7 | 73 | 217 | 7 | 2008.429 | 212 |
Role | 1 | 164 | 1349 | 39 | 2009.718 | 276.4615 |
Safety | 2 | 72 | 611 | 12 | 2014.333 | 223.3333 |
Scaffold | 6 | 137 | 1241 | 37 | 2008.973 | 217.3784 |
Score | 2 | 120 | 1286 | 27 | 2010.222 | 206.3704 |
Secretion | 7 | 95 | 460 | 10 | 2013.7 | 224.6 |
Smsc | 7 | 24 | 378 | 7 | 2017 | 148 |
Sncs | 1 | 28 | 264 | 6 | 2017 | 294 |
Sox9 | 3 | 82 | 349 | 7 | 2009.714 | 162.5714 |
Stem Cell | 5 | 178 | 2324 | 57 | 2010.509 | 213.2807 |
Stem Cell Therapy | 2 | 66 | 261 | 9 | 2008 | 251.7778 |
Stro | 3 | 52 | 375 | 7 | 2007.429 | 214.8571 |
Study | 2 | 204 | 4181 | 96 | 2010.094 | 231.8125 |
Study Group | 2 | 56 | 225 | 5 | 2010.2 | 289.8 |
Subchondral Bone | 1 | 108 | 517 | 12 | 2010.833 | 363.1667 |
Surgery | 2 | 133 | 780 | 16 | 2010.5 | 251.25 |
Synoviocyte | 7 | 59 | 247 | 7 | 2009.571 | 189.2857 |
Synovitis | 1 | 51 | 288 | 7 | 2010.429 | 448.2857 |
Synovium | 4 | 110 | 857 | 17 | 2008.471 | 232.8235 |
Synovium Msc | 4 | 41 | 401 | 8 | 2008.375 | 172.75 |
Synthesis | 1 | 102 | 418 | 11 | 2008.727 | 262.8182 |
Technique | 3 | 120 | 580 | 19 | 2010.632 | 254.7368 |
Tgf | 3 | 82 | 552 | 11 | 2004 | 223.5455 |
Tgf Beta | 6 | 91 | 871 | 19 | 2010.158 | 327.1579 |
Therapy | 1 | 170 | 1742 | 46 | 2010.978 | 272.6304 |
Time | 6 | 135 | 632 | 16 | 2009.375 | 333.9375 |
Tissue | 6 | 185 | 3255 | 84 | 2008.714 | 265.7857 |
Tissue Engineering | 6 | 112 | 607 | 20 | 2008.45 | 233.9 |
Tissue Engineering Approach | 5 | 65 | 150 | 5 | 2007.8 | 173 |
Tnf Alpha | 3 | 24 | 210 | 5 | 2009 | 170 |
Trauma | 4 | 83 | 265 | 7 | 2007.286 | 554.4286 |
Treatment | 2 | 159 | 2496 | 61 | 2011 | 277.6721 |
Type | 3 | 126 | 527 | 14 | 2009.214 | 257.8571 |
Use | 4 | 152 | 1048 | 29 | 2009.414 | 225.931 |
Variety | 4 | 114 | 373 | 9 | 2008.889 | 228.1111 |
Vegf | 5 | 34 | 295 | 5 | 2009 | 135 |
Vitro | 7 | 117 | 523 | 12 | 2009.75 | 208.75 |
Vivo | 7 | 70 | 245 | 5 | 2015 | 199.2 |
Week | 5 | 140 | 1121 | 25 | 2008.4 | 281.12 |
Year | 2 | 119 | 671 | 15 | 2011.533 | 198.2 |
Cluster 1: Osteoarthritis (127), Cartilage (80), Chondrocyte (66), Development (48), Articular Cartilage (47)
Cluster 2: Study (96), Patient (92), Treatment (61), Group (39), Knee (38).
Cluster 3: Culture (48), Growth Factor (44), Chondrogenesis (41), Repair (40), Differentiation (32).
Cluster 4: Cell (187), Msc (86), Mesenchymal stem cell (76), Mscs (46), Potential (36).
Cluster 5: Stem Cell (57), Effect (49), Formation (30), Week (25), Cartilage Repair (24).
Cluster 6: Tissue (84), Regeneration (40), Scaffold(37), Joint (30), Tissue engineering (20).
Cluster 7: Proliferation (23), Exosome (14), Vitro (12), Secretion (10), Migration (8).
Cluster 8: Horse (6)
The time variation of the keywords was shown in Fig. 6B and the color gradually changed from purple to yellow over time, which reflected the trends of the research hotspots. It could be seen in Table 5 that Smsc, Snsc and Exo appeared to be associated with the most recent publishing year of 2017. Articles with the keyword Trauma were the most cited, with an average citation index of 554.4286. We mainly evaluated these 240 keywords in terms of the three aspects described above.
With the development of regenerative medicine technology, stem cell therapy regenerative medicine technology has been used in the field of cartilage defects and the promotion of cartilage regeneration. Due to the wide range of research and differences at the article level, it was difficult to perform a comprehensive comparison and integration. There are different types of stem cells and the mechanisms are still unclear. Thus, we decided to select the 100 most cited articles on stem cell applications in OA in terms of the number of citations in the WoS core. We aimed to review the research of stem cells in osteoarthritis, analyze research hotspots and predicte developmental trends.
After content analysis and hotspot summary of these articles, we selected 215 keywords and classified them into 8 clusters, each of which had a theme related to the study of stem cell applications in osteoarthritis. These clusters specifically explored stem cell treatment of osteoarthritis from investigation of the molecular mechanism to clinical evaluation. We found that MSCs were the most widely applied cells and the research focused on the process of cartilage repair and exosome secretion. Mesenchymal stem cells are the direct precursor cells of chondrocytes12. Researchers have tried to use various methods to induce MSCs to differentiate into cartilage and obtained effective results in animal experiments13. On the other hand, modulation of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) plays an important role in stem cell therapy of OA. Increasing the production of TGF-β in subchondral bone could cause physiological changes in cartilage and lead to the progression of osteoarthritis14. MSCs regulated local TGF-β level at the optimal concentrations, and TGF-β promoted chondrocyte differentiation of MSCs in return15,16. Other studies regarded exosomes which are small membrane vesicles containing complexes of RNA and proteins that participate in the intercellular communication, as the active components in treatment17. In animal experiments, exosomes extracted from MSCs were injected into the articular tissue of rats, which inhibited the inflammatory response and repaired injured cartilage18,19. Small RNAs in exosomes decrease the expression of inflammatory factors and improve oxidative stress states20,21. The next steps are the targeting of exosomes and the identification of small RNAs that specifically regulate the expression of TGF-β, which would improve the effectiveness of treatment.
Judging from the content of these 100 articles, the progress in research on stem cell applications in osteoarthritis has been relatively rapid and comprehensive. However, simple local injection of stem cells has great limitations, such as the huge number of cells required, long treatment cycle, extremely high costs and perhaps side effects. In addition, the environment used for stem cell culture in vitro is very different from the real stem cell microenvironment. It is difficult for stem cells cultured in vitro to emulate the morphology and function of cells in vivo or to maintain the relevant characteristics in vivo for a long time. However, scientists have investigated the microenvironment of stem cells in bone marrow at single cell level22. Tissue engineering technology could reproduce the microenvironment on which stem cells depend and improve the efficacy of therapy23. "Microtissue engineering" is a research field that has emerged to address abovementioned challenges, aiming to construct a precise and controllable cell "microenvironment" with bionic structures and functions on a "microscale"24,25. In clinical applications, stem cells were coated with internal implants by tissue engineering methods to ensure their function and, the follow-up results indicated that this approach was effective. The goal of the current research is to modify the dosage of stem cells to achieve individualized and precise treatment assisted with microtissue engineering, which would greatly enhance the effectiveness.
Stem cell therapy has been an effective measure for many diseases including the recent outbreak of COVID-1926. The characteristics of stem cells can be attributed to the potential for multidirectional differentiation and the ability to internally regulate process by the secretion of exosomes, which ensures that they can repair damaged tissues and maintain homeostasis. A variety of mesenchymal stem cells have been used in the treatment of osteoarthritis and analyzed for their efficacy. After comparison, bone marrow MSCs had the optimal therapeutic effect but they have few sources and are difficult to sample, whereas synovial MSCs had the strongest ability to repair cartilage but were limited in inflammation control; adipose tissue MSCs were regarded as excellent cell sources but with potent trend toward adipogenesis, and umbilical MSCs had been proven to have the capacity for OA treatment and the repair of cartilage in 3D culture with greater potency for clinical transformation27. Thus, the targeted design of umbilical cord stem cells will result in a breakthrough in the future.
Finally, there are some limitations in our study. Because the total number of articles in this field is still relatively small, the 100 most cited articles are not very representative. The inclusion criterion of “English” and the use of a single database (WoS core) would cause us to miss some articles. The shortcoming of this analysis method is that articles are sorted in terms of the citation counts, which are relevant to the published years. In short, our study can still determine the research hotspots and predict the development trends to the greatest extent although limitations exist.
In our study, we found that MSCs, which transform into chondrocytes under specific induction conditions in vivo and in vitro to repair articular cartilage, are most widely used in basic science and are the best choice in clinical applications. MSCs were induced to differentiate into chondrocytes by secretion of a variety of factors, of which TGFβwas crucial during the process; at the same time, TGFβ inhibited the progression of local inflammation, which promoted the self-repair ability of local damaged tissues and achieved the purpose of intervention. Exosomes are regarded as the active components of stem cells for the treatment of OA. Microtissue engineering will contribute to accurate and effective stem cell therapy. The findings of our study will contribute to the continuous development and direction of the research of stem cells in OA.
Web of Science core collection database
Osteoarthritis
Mesenchymal stem cell
Transforming growth factorβ
Availability of Data and Materials
All data are included in the text and supplementary information.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Funding
None. There was no funding received for this research.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Dr Yue Zhu for his help
Author contributions
Keda Yang and Siming Zhou contributed equally to this work
Conceptualization, LT; Data curation, SZ; Formal analysis, KY; Funding acquisition, KY; Investigation, SZ; Methodology, SZ; Project administration, LT; Resources, KY; Software, SZ; Validation, SZ; Writing – original draft, KY; Writing – review & editing, LT.
All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1 Hunter, D. J. & Bierma-Zeinstra, S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet (London, England)393, 1745-1759, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30417-9 (2019).
2 Wang, S. Y. et al. Physical therapy interventions for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Annals of internal medicine157, 632-644, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00007 (2012).
3 Glyn-Jones, S. et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet (London, England)386, 376-387, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60802-3 (2015).
4 Deng, Y. et al. Reciprocal inhibition of YAP/TAZ and NF-κB regulates osteoarthritic cartilage degradation. Nature communications9, 4564, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07022-2 (2018).
5 Wan, W. L. et al. An In Situ Depot for Continuous Evolution of Gaseous H(2) Mediated by a Magnesium Passivation/Activation Cycle for Treating Osteoarthritis. 57, 9875-9879, doi:10.1002/anie.201806159 (2018).
6 Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F. & Luwel, M. Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the Association for Information Ence & Technology50, - (2010).
7 Zhang, T. et al. Research trends on the relationship between Microbiota and Gastric Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Cancer11, 4823-4831, doi:10.7150/jca.44126 (2020).
8 Li, S. et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Research in PubMed from 2014 to 2018. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research26, e922517, doi:10.12659/msm.922517 (2020).
9 Athanasou, N. A., Quinn, J. & McGee, J. O. Leucocyte common antigen is present on osteoclasts. The Journal of pathology153, 121-126, doi:10.1002/path.1711530205 (1987).
10 McGinnes, K. et al. Growth and detection of human bone marrow B-lineage colonies. Blood76, 896-905 (1990).
11 Marini, J. C. & Forlino, A. Replenishing cartilage from endogenous stem cells. The New England journal of medicine366, 2522-2524, doi:10.1056/NEJMcibr1204283 (2012).
12 Nombela-Arrieta, C., Ritz, J. & Silberstein, L. E. The elusive nature and function of mesenchymal stem cells. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology12, 126-131, doi:10.1038/nrm3049 (2011).
13 Johnson, K. et al. A stem cell-based approach to cartilage repair. Science (New York, N.Y.)336, 717-721, doi:10.1126/science.1215157 (2012).
14 Bush, J. R. & Beier, F. TGF-β and osteoarthritis--the good and the bad. Nature medicine19, 667-669, doi:10.1038/nm.3228 (2013).
15 Ma, N., Teng, X., Zheng, Q. & Chen, P. The regulatory mechanism of p38/MAPK in the chondrogenic differentiation from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research14, 434, doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1505-2 (2019).
16 Park, M. J. et al. Metformin Augments Anti-Inflammatory and Chondroprotective Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Experimental Osteoarthritis. 203, 127-136, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800006 (2019).
17 Kalluri, R. & LeBleu, V. S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. 367, doi:10.1126/science.aau6977 (2020).
18 Zhang, S. et al. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthritis and cartilage24, 2135-2140, doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.022 (2016).
19 He, L. et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect cartilage damage and relieve knee osteoarthritis pain in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Stem cell research & therapy11, 276, doi:10.1186/s13287-020-01781-w (2020).
20 Jin, Z., Ren, J. & Qi, S. Exosomal miR-9-5p secreted by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates osteoarthritis by inhibiting syndecan-1. Cell and tissue research381, 99-114, doi:10.1007/s00441-020-03193-x (2020).
21 Meng, Q. & Qiu, B. Exosomal MicroRNA-320a Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Regulates Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synoviocyte Activation by Suppressing CXCL9 Expression. Frontiers in physiology11, 441, doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00441 (2020).
22 Tikhonova, A. N. et al. The bone marrow microenvironment at single-cell resolution. Nature569, 222-228, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1104-8 (2019).
23 West-Livingston, L. N., Park, J. & Lee, S. J. The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00126 (2020).
24 Flood, P., Alvarez, L. & Reynaud, E. G. Free-floating epithelial micro-tissue arrays: a low cost and versatile technique. Biofabrication8, 045006, doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045006 (2016).
25 Ahmad, T. et al. Fabrication of in vitro 3D mineralized tissue by fusion of composite spheroids incorporating biomineral-coated nanofibers and human adipose-derived stem cells. Acta biomaterialia74, 464-477, doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.035 (2018).
26 Lammers, T. & Sofias, A. M. Dexamethasone nanomedicines for COVID-19. 15, 622-624, doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0752-z (2020).
27 Ni, Z. et al. Exosomes: roles and therapeutic potential in osteoarthritis. Bone research8, 25, doi:10.1038/s41413-020-0100-9 (2020).