The 100 Most Cited Articles on the Applications of Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-95003/v1

Abstract

Background: Stem cells have been applied in the treatment of OA, which had attracted wide attention. However, the research area is relatively extensive, and the research level is variable. In this study, we reviewed the mechanisms and clinical applications of stem cells in OA by using bibliometric analysis for the first time. We also revealed the characteristics, superior results and developmental trends in this field.

Methods: The Web of Science core collection database was used to search articles related to the application of stem cells in OA. We collected the general information from the top 100 cited articles. We analyzed and evaluated the articles according to publication number, journals, institutions, countries, keywords and extended keywords.

Results: The 100 most cited articles were cited from 129 to 1353 times mainly reviews and original articles. These articles were published from 2001 to 2017 and distributed evenly in America, East Asia and European countries. The United States contributed most in published number and international cooperation. The top ten institutions are mainly major universities and Duke University published a maximum of 10 articles. In terms of journals ,57 articles were published in the top ten journals. The keywords were divided into 8 categories from molecular mechanisms to clinical application.

Conclusions: In our study, we found that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) which could repair articular cartilage and inhibit local inflammation, are the most widely applied in research and treatment of OA. TGF-βwas crucial during the process. Exosomes are regarded as the active ingredients in stem cell therapy for OA. Microtissue engineering will contribute to accurate and effective stem cell therapy. The findings of our study will contribute to the continuous development of research and direct the research of stem cells in OA.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease associated with the aging of the population, an increasing number of obese people, and participation in sports, which reduces the quality of life of patients1. According to statistics, OA is the fourth most common cause of reduced physical function in the world. It is characterized by the destruction of articular cartilage and abnormal proliferation of osteophytes, and it produces pathological variation, joint pain, limited mobility and joint deformities as clinical manifestations. At present, traditional methods of intervention for osteoarthritis, such as functional exercises, physical therapy, lifestyle changes and the use of analgesics, which are the first choices for treatment, can only temporarily relieve symptoms but cannot improve the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis or reverse the process of osteoarthritis2. For more serious cases, joint replacement surgery is required; this method can be useful, but it is not suitable for young patients with a large amount of activity3. A consensus can be reached that joint degeneration and local inflammation are regarded as important factors leading to OA based on current studies4,5. The key to successful treatment of osteoarthritis is cartilage regeneration and the control of local inflammation. The research of treatment methods will focus on these two aspects.

Stem cells, which are a kind of seed cell with multiple differentiation potentials, have shown their advantages in the treatment of osteoarthritic cartilage lesions in recent years. In addition to their differentiation potential, stem cells can also secrete a variety of enzymes and nutritional factors to participate in the paracrine process, including growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines that play a role in anti-apoptosis, anti-fibrosis, antioxidation, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenesis promotion. In particular, autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from bone marrow, adipose tissue and umbilical cord have the potential to differentiate into cartilage. However, there are many types of stem cells, and the efficacy of different types remains to be compared. In addition, modifying stem cells based on the type and degree of OA can greatly improve the effect of treatment.

Bibliometric analysis is a cross-disciplinary approach using mathematical and statistical methods to analyze the quantity and quality of publications6. In view of the effect of stem cell therapy in clinical prevention and treatment of OA, this study aimed to discuss the role of stem cells in osteoarthritis and attempt to direct the research for the first time according to the bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles. The results can be used to evaluate the research status and predict the developmental trend of the application of stem cells in OA.

Materials And Methods

Search strategy and incision criteria

The relevant articles were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection database according to the indexes: immune and osteoporosis on July 30, 2020. The time range of retrieval covered all years, that is, from the year that the database had the records. There were a total of 1164 publications and the types of them included review, article, proceedings paper, editorial material and book chapter, etc. Then we established inclusion criteria and screened in accordance with it. The criteria included: (a) language of English, (b) osteoporosis involving in research, (c) focus on the discussion of immune modulation. Selected articles were sorted according to the number of citations and the 100 most cited ones were screened after sorting.

Data extraction

The above operations were performed by two reviewers independently and a third reviewer would help them build consensus when disagreements occurred. The general information of these articles was listed including the title, publication date, name of the first author and corresponding author, geographic origin, publication journal, publication institution, research theme, and journal impact factor.

Bibliometric analysis

The extracted information of these 100 articles were imported into the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrology (http://bibliometric.com/) and integrated according to their characteristics. CiteSpace V5.5.R1 SE, 64bit (Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and VOSviewer (Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands) were used to visualize the network of these information, such as authors and counties, institutions and journals7,8. Meanwhile, we also concluded research trends and predicted evolutional directions in terms of high-frequency keywords on CiteSpace.

Statistical analysis

Paired t-tests and one-way ANOVA of variance were performed for statistical analysis of at least three times experiments using SPSS. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The 100 most cited articles were collected according to the number of times cited number in the WoS core and sorted in descending order and included 65 articles (one of the articles was also a proceedings paper) and 35 reviews (Table 1). The number of citations ranged from a maximum of 1353 times to a minimum of 129. We collated the general information for these articles including the publication year, authors, journal, institutions and countries and examined the article characteristics by using bibliometric analysis.

Table 1

100 most cited articles about the application of stem cells in osteoarthritis

Rank

Article Title

Document Type

Corresponding author

Cited Reference Count

Times Cited, WoS Core

Publication Year

1

Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects

Review

Hunziker, EB

462

1353

2002

2

Osteoarthritis

Review

Goldring, MB

105

818

2007

3

Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis

Article

Barry, FP

62

678

2003

4

Human autologous culture expanded bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation for repair of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic knees

Article

Wakitani, S

29

635

2002

5

Inflammatory networks during cellular senescence: causes and consequences

Review

Freund, A

77

596

2010

6

The role of synovitis in osteoarthritis pathogenesis

Review

Scanzello, CR

112

425

2012

7

Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage

Review

Athanasiou, KA

113

400

2015

8

Regeneration of the articular surface of the rabbit synovial joint by cell homing: a proof of concept study

Article

Mao, JJ

38

382

2010

9

Chondrogenic differentiation and functional maturation of bovine mesenchymal stem cells in long-term agarose culture

Article

Tuan, RS

65

378

2006

10

Cartilage homeostasis in health and rheumatic diseases

Review

Goldring, MB

217

377

2009

11

Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling in mesenchymal stem cells of subchondral bone attenuates osteoarthritis

Article

Cao, X

61

374

2013

12

Intra-Articular Injection of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial

Article

Yoon, KS

84

369

2014

13

Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells?

Article

Im, GI

41

359

2005

14

The knee meniscus: Structure-function, pathophysiology, current repair techniques, and prospects for regeneration

Review

Athanasiou, KA

291

358

2011

15

Reduced chondrogenic and adipogenic activity of mesenchymal stem cells from patients with advanced osteoarthritis

Article

Barry, F

38

318

2002

16

In vitro cartilage tissue engineering with 3D porous aqueous-derived silk scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells

Article

Kaplan, DL

70

311

2005

17

Chondrocyte hypertrophy and osteoarthritis: role in initiation and progression of cartilage degeneration?

Review

van der Kraan, PM

134

307

2012

18

Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment

Article

Elisseeff, JH

36

294

2017

19

A Stem Cell-Based Approach to Cartilage Repair

Article

Johnson, K

35

290

2012

20

Hydrogel design for cartilage tissue engineering: A case study with hyaluronic acid

Article

Burdick, JA

118

290

2011

21

The Role of Growth Factors in Cartilage Repair

Article

Fortier, LA

96

287

2011

22

Oxygen and reactive oxygen species in cartilage degradation: friends or foes?

Review

Henrotin, Y

128

283

2005

23

The effect of nanofiber alignment on the maturation of engineered meniscus constructs

Article

Mauck, RL

54

274

2007

24

Isolation of adipose-derived stem cells and their induction to a chondrogenic phenotype

Article

Guilak, F

68

268

2010

25

Treatment of a full-thickness articular cartilage defect in the femoral condyle of an athlete with autologous bone-marrow stromal cells

Article

Kuroda, R

20

260

2007

26

Enumeration and phenotypic characterization of synovial fluid multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells in inflammatory and degenerative arthritis

Article

McGonagle, D

41

254

2004

27

ROLES OF INFLAMMATORY AND ANABOLIC CYTOKINES IN CARTILAGE METABOLISM: SIGNALS AND MULTIPLE EFFECTORS CONVERGE UPON MMP-13 REGULATION IN OSTEOARTHRITIS

Article

Goldring, MB

208

247

2011

28

Osteophytes: relevance and biology

Review

van der Kraan, PM

70

230

2007

29

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis. Preliminary report of four patients

Article

Davatchi, F

17

227

2011

30

Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Pilot Study

Article

Garcia-Sancho, J

51

225

2013

31

Identification and Specification of the Mouse Skeletal Stem Cell

Article

Chan, CKF

31

218

2015

32

Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Allogeneic Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Article

Garcia-Sancho, J

46

216

2015

33

A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair

Review

Schmidt, MB

29

215

2006

34

Cartilage tissue engineering: its potential and uses

Review

Tuan, RS

95

211

2006

35

Identification of new susceptibility loci for osteoarthritis (arcOGEN): a genome-wide association study

Article

Zeggini, E

37

209

2012

36

Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections for the treatment of degenerative cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis

Article

Di Martino, A

33

209

2011

37

Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human articular chondrocytes: comparison of 2D and 3D cultures

Article

Welting, TJM

58

208

2012

38

Infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis

Article

Choi, YJ

45

207

2012

39

MicroRNA-124a Is a Key Regulator of Proliferation and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Secretion in Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes From Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Article

Kawano, S

50

207

2009

40

Migratory Chondrogenic Progenitor Cells from Repair Tissue during the Later Stages of Human Osteoarthritis

Article

Miosgel, N

51

205

2009

41

Chondrocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells sequentially exposed to transforming growth factor-beta 1 in monolayer and insulin-like growth factor-I in a three-dimensional matrix

Article

Nixon, AJ

64

203

2001

42

Increased Knee Cartilage Volume in Degenerative Joint Disease using Percutaneously Implanted, Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Article

Busse, D

58

201

2008

43

Mesenchymal stem cells in arthritic diseases

Review

Tuan, RS

88

200

2008

44

Injectable mesenchymal stem cell therapy for large cartilage defects - A porcine model

Article

Hui, JHP

40

199

2007

45

Update on the biology of the chondrocyte and new approaches to treating cartilage diseases

Review

Goldring, MB

163

195

2006

46

Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis

Review

Loeser, RF

113

193

2016

47

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injections Improve Symptoms of Knee Osteoarthritis

Article

Choi, YJ

29

193

2013

48

Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats

Article

Qin, L

58

189

2016

49

Tissue engineering of functional articular cartilage: the current status

Review

Ito, K

196

189

2012

50

Mesenchymal stem cells in joint disease and repair

Review

Barry, F

104

188

2013

51

Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Delivered via Intra-Articular Injection to the Knee Following Partial Medial Meniscectomy A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study

Article

Vangsness, CT

21

187

2014

52

Mesenchymal stem cells: innovative therapeutic tools for rheumatic diseases

Review

Noel, D

85

185

2009

53

Comparison of mesenchymal tissues-derived stem cells for in vivo chondrogenesis: suitable conditions for cell therapy of cartilage defects in rabbit

Article

Sekiya, I

29

184

2008

54

Therapies from Fucoidan; Multifunctional Marine Polymers

Review

Fitton, JH

128

182

2011

55

Effect of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem and regenerative cells on lameness in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis of the coxofemoral joints: A randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, controlled trial

Article

Black, LL

47

182

2007

56

Combined effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 and transforming growth factor-beta 1 on periosteal mesenchymal cells during chondrogenesis in vitro

Article

O'Driscoll, SW

71

179

2003

57

Technology Insight: adult mesenchymal stem cells for osteoarthritis therapy

Review

Tuan, RS

63

177

2008

58

Osteoblast physiology in normal and pathological conditions

Review

Cantatore, FP

189

176

2011

59

Antiinflammatory and chondroprotective effects of intraarticular injection of adipose-derived stem cells in experimental osteoarthritis

Article

van Lent, PLEM

38

174

2012

60

Higher chondrogenic potential of fibrous synovium- and adipose synovium-derived cells compared with. subcutaneous fat-derived cells - Distinguishing properties of mesenchymal stem cells in humans

Article

Sekiya, I

42

174

2006

61

Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration

Article

Toh, WS

15

172

2016

62

Proinflammatory cytokines inhibit osteogenic differentiation from stem cells: implications for bone repair during inflammation

Article

Lacey, DC

40

170

2009

63

Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Based Therapy for Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial

Article

Jorgensen, C

27

161

2016

64

Bioactive Coatings for Orthopaedic Implants-Recent Trends in Development of Implant Coatings

Review

Choong, PFM

303

159

2014

65

Synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells in health and early osteoarthritis - Detection and functional evaluation at the single-cell level

Article

Jones, EA

36

158

2008

66

Evaluation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction or Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Osteoarthritis

Article

Frisbie, DD

32

157

2009

67

The structural architecture of adult mammalian articular cartilage evolves by a synchronized process of tissue resorption and neoformation during postnatal development

Article

Hunziker, EB

41

157

2007

68

Progress in intra-articular therapy

Review

Evans, CH

96

155

2014

69

Intra-articular Injected Synovial Stem Cells Differentiate into Meniscal Cells Directly and Promote Meniscal Regeneration Without Mobilization to Distant Organs in Rat Massive Meniscal Defect

Article

Sekiya, I

36

154

2009

70

Cartilage tissue engineering for degenerative joint disease

Review

Mainil-Varlet, P

218

154

2006

71

Self-crosslinked oxidized alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage regeneration

Article

Banerjee, R

56

153

2014

72

Platelet-rich plasma for managing pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis

Review

Maffulli, N

113

153

2013

73

TGF-beta signaling in chondrocyte terminal differentiation and osteoarthritis Modulation and integration of signaling pathways through receptor-Smads

Review

van der Kraan, PM

92

153

2009

74

Mesenchymal progenitor cell markers in human articular cartilage: normal distribution and changes in osteoarthritis

Article

Lotz, MK

65

153

2009

75

Degradable hydrogel scaffolds for in vivo delivery of single and dual growth factors in cartilage repair

Article

Jansen, JA

57

151

2007

76

Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing human synovial mesenchymal stem cells enhance cartilage tissue regeneration and prevent osteoarthritis of the knee in a rat model

Article

Zhang, CQ

65

148

2017

77

Basic science and clinical application of platelet-rich plasma for cartilage defects and osteoarthritis: a review

Review

Peng, J

86

148

2013

78

Tissue engineering for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A review of current strategies

Review

McAllister, DR

94

147

2006

79

Adipose-derived adult stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering

Article; Proceedings Paper

Guilak, F

75

146

2004

80

Impact of Aging on the Regenerative Properties of Bone Marrow-, Muscle-, and Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells

Article

Darling, EM

65

145

2014

81

Tissue engineered ceramic artificial joint - ex vivo osteogenic differentiation of patient mesenchymal cells on total ankle joints for treatment of osteoarthritis

Article

Ohgushi, H

27

145

2005

82

Cartilage tissue engineering using differentiated and purified induced pluripotent stem cells

Article

Guilak, F

49

142

2012

83

Enhanced Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Low Oxygen Environment Micropellet Cultures

Article

Doran, MR

86

142

2010

84

Preclinical animal models in single site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review

Review

Schaer, TP

118

142

2009

85

Intra-articular Injection of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Six Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Article

Eslaminejad, MB

32

141

2012

86

Chondrogenic potential of human adult mesenchymal stem cells is independent of age or osteoarthritis etiology

Article

Stoop, R

36

140

2007

87

Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis

Review

Majumdar, AS

47

139

2012

88

Hypoxic conditions increase hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 2 alpha and enhance chondrogenesis in stem cells from the infrapatellar fat pad of osteoarthritis patients

Article

Hardingham, TE

52

139

2007

89

The Role of Changes in Extracellular Matrix of Cartilage in the Presence of Inflammation on the Pathology of Osteoarthritis

Review

Nam, J

100

137

2013

90

INFLAMMATORY AND CATABOLIC SIGNALLING IN INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS: THE ROLES OF NF-KB AND MAP KINASES

Article

Wuertz, K

153

137

2012

91

Activation and dedifferentiation of chondrocytes: Implications in cartilage injury and repair

Review

Schulze-Tanzil, G

98

137

2009

92

Cartilage Repair in a Rat Model of Osteoarthritis Through Intraarticular Transplantation of Muscle-Derived Stem Cells Expressing Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 and Soluble Flt-1

Article

Huard, J

50

135

2009

93

Current research on pharmacologic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis

Review

Xu, JK

142

133

2016

94

Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: Focus on articular cartilage and intervertebral disc regeneration

Article

Mobasheri, A

196

132

2016

95

The effect of platelet rich plasma combined with microfractures on the treatment of chondral defects: an experimental study in a sheep model

Article

Milano, G

66

132

2010

96

Tissue engineering through autologous mesenchymal stem cells

Review

Jorgensen, C

48

132

2004

97

Animal models of osteoarthritis: classification, update, and measurement of outcomes

Review

Laurencin, CT

340

131

2016

98

Composite Three-Dimensional Woven Scaffolds with Interpenetrating Network Hydrogels to Create Functional Synthetic Articular Cartilage

Article

Liao, IC

50

130

2013

99

Macromer density influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis and maturation in photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels

Article

Mauck, RL

43

130

2009

100

3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration

Article

Haglund, L

53

129

2015

Publication years and variation tendency

In the 1990s, the discussion about stem cells and osteoarthritis was initiated. Initially, more attention was devoted to the role played by hematopoietic stem cells and their differentiated immune cells in osteoarthritis9,10. Figure 1 showed that the publication years of the 100 most cited articles were unevenly distributed from 2001 to 2017. The years in which more than 10 publications were published in 2009 (13, ranked first), 2012 (12, ranked second) and 2007 (10, ranked third). In general, the level of published articles was relatively higher in the two periods from 2006 to 2009 and from 2011 to 2013. In 2009, the FDA approved Geron Pharmaceuticals' application for a Phase I clinical trial (IND) for the treatment of spinal injury using oligodendrocyte precursors (GRNOPC1) differentiated from stem cells. This was the first demonstration of the clinical safety and effectiveness of pluripotent stem cells and led to the clinical application of stem cells. In 2012, the article “Replenishing Cartilage from Endogenous Stem Cells” was published in The New England Journal of Medicine, pioneered the treatment of osteoarthritis by autologous stem cell transplantation and it was widely discussed11.

Most active countries and institutions

The top ten most active countries were according to the number of publications each year are shown in Fig. 2. Unsurprisingly, America ranked first with a total of 49 articles and always maintained an absolute lead over the others. The development in this field has been relatively balanced worldwide. In East Asia, Japan published 9 articles during 2002–2009, and research in South Korea and China developed rapidly from 2012 to 2017. The representatives of Europe were the Netherlands (n = 10), Germany (n = 7), England (n = 6) and Italy (n = 6). In addition, there were five articles published by groups from Australia. International cooperation was also dominated by the United States. Japan and the United Kingdom also accounted for a large proportion in the network (Fig. 3). According to the article number, we listed the top 10 institutions (Fig. 4). Duke University ranked first with 10 articles. Tokyo Medical & Dental University, University of Pennsylvania and Johns Hopkins University ranked second, third and fourth with 9, 8 and 7 articles, respectively. Otherwise, Harvard University, Stanford University published 6 articles and the National University of Singapore, Brown University, University of Manchester, and Charite published 5 articles.

Most active authors and journals

We counted the authors who were the first or corresponding authors of the 100 articles and ranked in descending order of the published article count for the top ten authors (Table 2). Mauck RL published the most articles (n = 5), one as the first author and two as the corresponding author. Five authors published 4 articles: Goldring MB, Tuan RS, Guilak F, Noel D and Jorgensen C. The other four authors, Hunziker EB, Barry F, van der Kraan, PM and Diekman BO published 3 articles. The top ten cocited authors were listed in Table 3 in descending order of the article count. CiteSpace was used to reveal the network of these cocited authors (Fig. 5). Pittenger MF published 30 articles with 0.07 centrality index. Four cocited authors published over 20 articles, Caplan AI (n = 25), Murphy JM (n = 24), Wakitani S (n = 21) and Hunziker EB (n = 21). The centrality index for Caplan AI was 0.22, whereas that for the other three was 0.07.

Table 2

The first or corresponding authors who had been cited (sorted by total number of articles)

Rank

Author

Article counts

First author counts

Corresponding author counts

1

Mauck, RL

5

1

2

2

Goldring, MB

4

4

4

3

Tuan, RS

4

0

4

4

Guilak, F

4

1

3

5

Noel, D

4

0

1

6

Jorgensen, C

4

1

2

7

Hunziker, EB

3

2

2

8

Barry, F

3

1

2

9

van der Kraan, PM

3

3

3

10

Diekman, BO

3

1

0

Table 3

The top 10 co-cited authors sorted by article counts

Rank

Co-cited author

Article counts

Centrality index

1

PITTENGER MF

30

0.07

2

CAPLAN AI

25

0.22

3

MURPHY JM

24

0.07

4

WAKITANI S

21

0.07

5

HUNZIKER EB

21

0.07

6

BRITTBERG M

19

0.21

7

BUCKWALTER JA

17

0.15

8

GOLDRING MB

17

0.14

9

GUILAK F

14

0.04

10

JOHNSTONE B

13

0.03

The top ten journals were listed in descending order of the number of published articles (Table 4). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage published 20 articles, which was the highest number and accounted for 35% of the total of 57 articles published by the ten journals. The second ranked journal was Arthritis and Rheumatism, which published 8 articles. Both of the top two journals were journals specializing in joints. In addition, three quarters of the journals belonged to Q1 and Q2 according to the Quartile in Category and the impact factor of four articles was over 10 points. An article published in Nature Medicine had an impact factor of 36.23, and another article published in The Lancet had an impact factor of 60.392, which reflected the authority of these articles.

Table 4

The top 10 journals sorted by article counts

Rank

Journal

Article counts

Impact factor

Quartile in Category

1

Osteoarthritis And Cartilage

20

4.793

Q2

2

Arthritis And Rheumatism

8

4.751

Q2

3

Nature Reviews Rheumatology

6

16.625

Q1

4

Biomaterials

5

10.317

Q1

5

Stem Cells

4

6.022

Q2

6

Arthritis Research & Therapy

4

4.103

Q2

7

Nature Medicine

3

36.23

Q1

8

Cell And Tissue Research

3

4.044

Q3

9

Journal Of Orthopaedic Research

2

2.728

Q3

10

Lancet

2

60.392

Q1

Research hotspots

A total of 215 keywords were extracted and were listed in Table 5. The number of occurrences of keywords ranged from 5 to 187 times. Though VOSviewer analysis, these items were classified into 8 clusters which were shown in Fig. 6A. Each cluster had a common theme: cluster 1 (52 items, in red, pathogenesis), cluster 2 (46 items, in green, clinical follow-up), cluster 3 (40 items, in blue, molecular mechanism), cluster 4 (30 items, in yellow, stem cell application), cluster 5 (19 items, in purple, animal experiment), cluster 6 (15 items, in cyan, treatment method), cluster 7 (12 items, in orange, action of the exosome) and cluster 8 (1 item, in brown). Top five keywords of each cluster were listed as follows and the number of occurrences is indicated:

Table 5

General information of 215 keywords

Keywords

cluster

Links

Total link strength

Occurrences

Average publishing years

Average citations

3D Culture

3

44

286

7

2011.571

197.8571

Ability

4

132

586

14

2010.571

205.8571

Addition

1

83

181

5

2009.6

242.8

Adipose Synovium

4

44

526

9

2006.778

176.1111

Adverse Event

2

84

387

9

2013.889

211.6667

Age

4

140

1121

29

2010.517

182.6552

Angiogenesis

5

80

311

7

2011.286

184

Animal

2

98

532

11

2009.636

286.7273

Animal Model

1

63

460

15

2011.733

193.5333

Application

4

126

628

16

2009.688

180.75

Arthritis

1

71

349

11

2006.546

231.8182

Articular Cartilage

1

180

1899

47

2010.553

245.4255

Articular Cartilage Defect

2

93

492

12

2005.833

369.5833

Articular Cartilage Layer

1

17

390

10

2007

157

Articular Injection

2

76

473

10

2012.9

198.3

Ascs

5

57

402

10

2012

209

Atmscs

3

26

282

6

2005

359

Beta

3

72

452

11

2009.909

247.4545

Biology

1

88

322

12

2008.25

205.6667

Bmp

5

34

348

6

2009

135

Bmsc

4

26

185

5

2012

139

Bone

3

134

790

21

2009

253.1905

Bone Marrow

4

151

1125

26

2008

216.1538

Bone Marrow Msc

4

74

349

7

2010.143

184.1429

Capacity

4

148

863

21

2007.191

266.6667

Cartilage

1

189

3132

80

2010.263

237.4125

Cartilage Damage

1

94

275

8

2009.25

227.25

Cartilage Defect

2

112

825

20

2009.25

250

Cartilage Homeostasis

1

68

220

6

2007.833

294.3333

Cartilage Quality

2

27

337

7

2013.857

221.1429

Cartilage Regeneration

4

110

482

10

2010

211.7

Cartilage Repair

5

142

1003

24

2009.375

332.5

Cartilage Tissue Engineering

6

103

534

14

2007.143

268.8571

Cell

4

204

7456

187

2008.412

229.8021

Cell Proliferation

3

104

484

11

2007.727

244.3636

Cell Therapy

4

83

220

5

2009.6

163.8

Challenge

6

123

569

16

2010.125

194.8125

Change

1

152

1272

31

2011.452

250.7419

Chondrocyte

1

174

2654

66

2009.727

258.697

Chondrocyte Differentiation

1

29

144

7

2009.429

172.5714

Chondrogenesis

3

136

1779

41

2006.902

209.0488

Chondrogenic Differentiation

5

110

366

8

2007.75

199.375

Chromosome

1

13

145

5

2012

209

Colony

4

80

404

8

2006.125

188.75

Combination

5

124

664

15

2008.4

199.4

Comparison

2

95

438

9

2009.556

176.7778

Control

1

136

704

17

2011.118

220.3529

Control Group

2

80

339

7

2011.143

256.1429

Culture

3

165

2069

48

2006.25

263.2917

Cytokine

1

104

445

11

2009.182

283.7273

Damage

1

127

468

12

2009.833

239.1667

Day

5

97

778

17

2008.765

175.1765

Defect

2

131

1383

31

2010.129

218.3871

Degeneration

1

132

643

17

2010.588

283

Degenerative Joint Disease

1

80

307

9

2009.667

214.4444

Delivery

6

119

701

17

2009.294

259.7059

Development

1

158

1527

48

2011.083

253.875

Difference

3

113

438

10

2009.3

240.8

Differentiation

3

159

1185

32

2008.594

223.6562

Disability

2

100

461

11

2014.273

208.1818

Disease

1

146

1163

34

2010.853

248.4706

Donor

4

97

589

12

2006.5

225

Ecm

1

84

450

11

2010.273

174.7273

Effect

5

194

2207

49

2010.367

194.1224

Efficacy

2

86

651

13

2015

203

Evaluation

2

105

651

14

2010.429

235.7143

Evidence

2

140

674

14

2010.071

292.4286

Exo

7

24

280

5

2017

148

Exosome

7

44

728

14

2016.643

156.5714

Expression

3

156

1307

31

2010.097

194.0968

Extracellular Matrix

1

107

430

11

2012.091

194.0909

Factor

1

155

1361

37

2010.135

288.8108

Feasibility

2

62

325

7

2012.714

231.1429

Fibrous Synovium

4

20

513

9

2006

174

Field

6

68

172

6

2008.667

219.5

Focus

1

65

186

5

2013.2

200.8

Formation

5

169

1249

30

2010.467

217.2667

Fucoidan

1

13

75

5

2011

182

Function

1

158

1162

30

2009.467

245.9667

Gag Content

3

38

205

5

2011.4

192.4

Group

2

152

1820

39

2009.949

215.4615

Growth Factor

3

159

1792

44

2008.068

253.1818

Growth Factor Beta

3

103

361

8

2007.25

242.875

Horse

8

39

261

6

2007.667

164.6667

Human

4

95

294

6

2008.5

289

Hyaline Cartilage

2

102

321

7

2010.143

280.5714

Hydrogel

6

78

564

17

2011.471

195.7647

Hypoxia

3

59

274

6

2006.833

187.5

Identification

1

68

171

5

2008.6

183

Igf

3

69

819

18

2004.167

182.5556

Iliac Crest

4

67

200

5

2005.8

212.8

Immunohistochemistry

3

83

263

5

2007.2

169.4

Improvement

2

96

674

14

2011.643

233

Increase

3

115

445

12

2009.25

236.8333

Induction

5

88

359

9

2008.444

377

Inflammation

1

128

866

23

2010.783

262.0435

Infrapatellar Fat Pad

2

56

349

7

2010.857

183.5714

Injection

2

99

913

20

2011.8

192.5

Insulin

3

92

449

9

2004.778

221.2222

Intra Articular Injection

2

113

665

14

2012.714

210.5

Intraarticular Injection

5

85

289

6

2010.667

254.8333

Ipfp

3

26

306

6

2007

139

Joint

6

149

1210

30

2008.833

267.2333

Joint Disease

1

107

400

10

2011

341.5

Joint Tissue

1

51

222

6

2012.167

378.3333

Knee

2

145

1657

38

2010.579

253.1316

Knee Joint

5

67

311

7

2008.286

411.7143

Knee Osteoarthritis

2

93

699

14

2012.357

244.8571

Level

2

155

852

20

2010.05

202

Ligament

5

60

365

11

2007.727

250

Local Delivery

6

66

153

5

2010.2

265.4

Magnesium

3

16

192

8

2016

189

Marker

3

114

724

15

2008.267

179.9333

Matrix

4

157

1213

29

2009.586

199.2759

Mdsc

5

34

399

7

2009

135

Mean

2

89

283

6

2010.5

188.5

Mechanical Property

6

92

389

11

2008.364

250

Mechanism

1

137

858

22

2011.091

271.4091

Medial Femoral Condyle

2

55

252

6

2006.667

291

Mesenchymal Stem Cell

4

193

3333

76

2009.303

219.3158

Microfracture

2

19

378

7

2010

132

Migration

7

88

413

8

2013.5

187.5

Mir

7

35

254

6

2011.667

187.3333

Model

1

140

953

25

2009.76

262.68

Molecule

3

112

579

15

2011.2

181.6

Month

2

112

1160

24

2010.125

207.9167

Mri

2

81

344

7

2011.571

219.2857

Mrna Expression

3

55

318

7

2009

194.2857

Msc

4

172

3619

86

2009.826

208.3721

Mscs

4

150

1753

46

2008.674

203.3043

Muscle

4

98

440

9

2008.444

228.2222

Musculoskeletal Disorder

4

72

267

6

2015

139.8333

Normal Cartilage

2

62

270

5

2010

199

Notch

3

21

300

6

2009

153

Number

3

155

936

22

2008.364

260.3182

Oa Joint

1

65

232

7

2011.143

215

Osteoarthritis

1

202

4647

127

2010.976

242.3543

Osteogenesis

3

69

337

8

2010.625

246.375

Osteogenic Differentiation

3

48

220

6

2010.667

172.1667

Osteophyte

1

14

110

5

2007

230

Osteophyte Formation

1

44

155

5

2007.4

211

Oxygen

3

46

326

8

2005.5

247

Pain

2

154

1657

38

2012.395

221.7895

Parameter

2

107

462

10

2010.6

184.4

Pathogenesis

1

99

508

14

2011

403

Pathology

1

76

387

9

2013.444

236

Pathway

1

114

531

17

2010.471

174.4118

Patient

2

163

3917

92

2010.794

212.25

Pellet

4

95

486

11

2009.182

163.9091

Pellet Culture

3

80

294

7

2008

238.5714

Periosteum

3

92

278

7

2008.429

254.4286

Phenotype

1

143

882

24

2008.875

278.625

Platelet Rich Plasma

2

98

520

11

2011.818

179.1818

Point

2

50

524

10

2012.8

198.4

Potential

4

161

1645

36

2008.889

188.8611

Presence

1

91

387

9

2009

203.7778

Procedure

2

111

407

10

2010.3

228.6

Process

1

151

1186

32

2010.188

250.625

Production

3

139

824

19

2007.474

215.7368

Progenitor Cell

6

113

502

13

2007.692

220.1538

Progression

1

65

430

11

2012.455

184.6364

Proliferation

7

140

1094

23

2010.217

193.2174

Proteoglycan

3

77

212

5

2008.8

172

Prp

2

79

777

18

2011.889

155.2778

Quality

2

79

282

6

2010.667

211.3333

Ra Synoviocyte

7

16

165

5

2009

207

Range

2

95

443

10

2010.2

224

Rat

3

66

328

8

2012.375

173.125

Rat Model

5

67

357

6

2012.833

145.5

Regeneration

6

158

1761

40

2010.9

242.95

Regenerative Therapy

4

54

156

5

2014.8

137.2

Regulation

1

78

282

9

2010

244

Repair

3

179

1591

40

2009.325

293.85

Research

1

115

627

19

2010.895

239.3158

Review

1

143

954

30

2009.6

255.3667

Rheumatoid Arthritis

7

73

217

7

2008.429

212

Role

1

164

1349

39

2009.718

276.4615

Safety

2

72

611

12

2014.333

223.3333

Scaffold

6

137

1241

37

2008.973

217.3784

Score

2

120

1286

27

2010.222

206.3704

Secretion

7

95

460

10

2013.7

224.6

Smsc

7

24

378

7

2017

148

Sncs

1

28

264

6

2017

294

Sox9

3

82

349

7

2009.714

162.5714

Stem Cell

5

178

2324

57

2010.509

213.2807

Stem Cell Therapy

2

66

261

9

2008

251.7778

Stro

3

52

375

7

2007.429

214.8571

Study

2

204

4181

96

2010.094

231.8125

Study Group

2

56

225

5

2010.2

289.8

Subchondral Bone

1

108

517

12

2010.833

363.1667

Surgery

2

133

780

16

2010.5

251.25

Synoviocyte

7

59

247

7

2009.571

189.2857

Synovitis

1

51

288

7

2010.429

448.2857

Synovium

4

110

857

17

2008.471

232.8235

Synovium Msc

4

41

401

8

2008.375

172.75

Synthesis

1

102

418

11

2008.727

262.8182

Technique

3

120

580

19

2010.632

254.7368

Tgf

3

82

552

11

2004

223.5455

Tgf Beta

6

91

871

19

2010.158

327.1579

Therapy

1

170

1742

46

2010.978

272.6304

Time

6

135

632

16

2009.375

333.9375

Tissue

6

185

3255

84

2008.714

265.7857

Tissue Engineering

6

112

607

20

2008.45

233.9

Tissue Engineering Approach

5

65

150

5

2007.8

173

Tnf Alpha

3

24

210

5

2009

170

Trauma

4

83

265

7

2007.286

554.4286

Treatment

2

159

2496

61

2011

277.6721

Type

3

126

527

14

2009.214

257.8571

Use

4

152

1048

29

2009.414

225.931

Variety

4

114

373

9

2008.889

228.1111

Vegf

5

34

295

5

2009

135

Vitro

7

117

523

12

2009.75

208.75

Vivo

7

70

245

5

2015

199.2

Week

5

140

1121

25

2008.4

281.12

Year

2

119

671

15

2011.533

198.2

Cluster 1: Osteoarthritis (127), Cartilage (80), Chondrocyte (66), Development (48), Articular Cartilage (47)

Cluster 2: Study (96), Patient (92), Treatment (61), Group (39), Knee (38).

Cluster 3: Culture (48), Growth Factor (44), Chondrogenesis (41), Repair (40), Differentiation (32).

Cluster 4: Cell (187), Msc (86), Mesenchymal stem cell (76), Mscs (46), Potential (36).

Cluster 5: Stem Cell (57), Effect (49), Formation (30), Week (25), Cartilage Repair (24).

Cluster 6: Tissue (84), Regeneration (40), Scaffold(37), Joint (30), Tissue engineering (20).

Cluster 7: Proliferation (23), Exosome (14), Vitro (12), Secretion (10), Migration (8).

Cluster 8: Horse (6)

The time variation of the keywords was shown in Fig. 6B and the color gradually changed from purple to yellow over time, which reflected the trends of the research hotspots. It could be seen in Table 5 that Smsc, Snsc and Exo appeared to be associated with the most recent publishing year of 2017. Articles with the keyword Trauma were the most cited, with an average citation index of 554.4286. We mainly evaluated these 240 keywords in terms of the three aspects described above.

Discussion

With the development of regenerative medicine technology, stem cell therapy regenerative medicine technology has been used in the field of cartilage defects and the promotion of cartilage regeneration. Due to the wide range of research and differences at the article level, it was difficult to perform a comprehensive comparison and integration. There are different types of stem cells and the mechanisms are still unclear. Thus, we decided to select the 100 most cited articles on stem cell applications in OA in terms of the number of citations in the WoS core. We aimed to review the research of stem cells in osteoarthritis, analyze research hotspots and predicte developmental trends.

After content analysis and hotspot summary of these articles, we selected 215 keywords and classified them into 8 clusters, each of which had a theme related to the study of stem cell applications in osteoarthritis. These clusters specifically explored stem cell treatment of osteoarthritis from investigation of the molecular mechanism to clinical evaluation. We found that MSCs were the most widely applied cells and the research focused on the process of cartilage repair and exosome secretion. Mesenchymal stem cells are the direct precursor cells of chondrocytes12. Researchers have tried to use various methods to induce MSCs to differentiate into cartilage and obtained effective results in animal experiments13. On the other hand, modulation of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) plays an important role in stem cell therapy of OA. Increasing the production of TGF-β in subchondral bone could cause physiological changes in cartilage and lead to the progression of osteoarthritis14. MSCs regulated local TGF-β level at the optimal concentrations, and TGF-β promoted chondrocyte differentiation of MSCs in return15,16. Other studies regarded exosomes which are small membrane vesicles containing complexes of RNA and proteins that participate in the intercellular communication, as the active components in treatment17. In animal experiments, exosomes extracted from MSCs were injected into the articular tissue of rats, which inhibited the inflammatory response and repaired injured cartilage18,19. Small RNAs in exosomes decrease the expression of inflammatory factors and improve oxidative stress states20,21. The next steps are the targeting of exosomes and the identification of small RNAs that specifically regulate the expression of TGF-β, which would improve the effectiveness of treatment.

Judging from the content of these 100 articles, the progress in research on stem cell applications in osteoarthritis has been relatively rapid and comprehensive. However, simple local injection of stem cells has great limitations, such as the huge number of cells required, long treatment cycle, extremely high costs and perhaps side effects. In addition, the environment used for stem cell culture in vitro is very different from the real stem cell microenvironment. It is difficult for stem cells cultured in vitro to emulate the morphology and function of cells in vivo or to maintain the relevant characteristics in vivo for a long time. However, scientists have investigated the microenvironment of stem cells in bone marrow at single cell level22. Tissue engineering technology could reproduce the microenvironment on which stem cells depend and improve the efficacy of therapy23. "Microtissue engineering" is a research field that has emerged to address abovementioned challenges, aiming to construct a precise and controllable cell "microenvironment" with bionic structures and functions on a "microscale"24,25. In clinical applications, stem cells were coated with internal implants by tissue engineering methods to ensure their function and, the follow-up results indicated that this approach was effective. The goal of the current research is to modify the dosage of stem cells to achieve individualized and precise treatment assisted with microtissue engineering, which would greatly enhance the effectiveness.

Stem cell therapy has been an effective measure for many diseases including the recent outbreak of COVID-1926. The characteristics of stem cells can be attributed to the potential for multidirectional differentiation and the ability to internally regulate process by the secretion of exosomes, which ensures that they can repair damaged tissues and maintain homeostasis. A variety of mesenchymal stem cells have been used in the treatment of osteoarthritis and analyzed for their efficacy. After comparison, bone marrow MSCs had the optimal therapeutic effect but they have few sources and are difficult to sample, whereas synovial MSCs had the strongest ability to repair cartilage but were limited in inflammation control; adipose tissue MSCs were regarded as excellent cell sources but with potent trend toward adipogenesis, and umbilical MSCs had been proven to have the capacity for OA treatment and the repair of cartilage in 3D culture with greater potency for clinical transformation27. Thus, the targeted design of umbilical cord stem cells will result in a breakthrough in the future.

Finally, there are some limitations in our study. Because the total number of articles in this field is still relatively small, the 100 most cited articles are not very representative. The inclusion criterion of “English” and the use of a single database (WoS core) would cause us to miss some articles. The shortcoming of this analysis method is that articles are sorted in terms of the citation counts, which are relevant to the published years. In short, our study can still determine the research hotspots and predict the development trends to the greatest extent although limitations exist.

Conclusion

In our study, we found that MSCs, which transform into chondrocytes under specific induction conditions in vivo and in vitro to repair articular cartilage, are most widely used in basic science and are the best choice in clinical applications. MSCs were induced to differentiate into chondrocytes by secretion of a variety of factors, of which TGFβwas crucial during the process; at the same time, TGFβ inhibited the progression of local inflammation, which promoted the self-repair ability of local damaged tissues and achieved the purpose of intervention. Exosomes are regarded as the active components of stem cells for the treatment of OA. Microtissue engineering will contribute to accurate and effective stem cell therapy. The findings of our study will contribute to the continuous development and direction of the research of stem cells in OA.

Abbreviations

WoS core

Web of Science core collection database

OA

Osteoarthritis

MSC

Mesenchymal stem cell

TGF-β

Transforming growth factorβ

Declarations

Availability of Data and Materials

All data are included in the text and supplementary information.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Funding

None. There was no funding received for this research.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr Yue Zhu for his help

Author contributions

Keda Yang and Siming Zhou contributed equally to this work

Conceptualization, LT; Data curation, SZ; Formal analysis, KY; Funding acquisition, KY; Investigation, SZ; Methodology, SZ; Project administration, LT; Resources, KY; Software, SZ; Validation, SZ; Writing – original draft, KY; Writing – review & editing, LT.

All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 Hunter, D. J. & Bierma-Zeinstra, S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet (London, England)393, 1745-1759, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30417-9 (2019).

2 Wang, S. Y. et al. Physical therapy interventions for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Annals of internal medicine157, 632-644, doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00007 (2012).

3 Glyn-Jones, S. et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet (London, England)386, 376-387, doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60802-3 (2015).

4 Deng, Y. et al. Reciprocal inhibition of YAP/TAZ and NF-κB regulates osteoarthritic cartilage degradation. Nature communications9, 4564, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07022-2 (2018).

5 Wan, W. L. et al. An In Situ Depot for Continuous Evolution of Gaseous H(2) Mediated by a Magnesium Passivation/Activation Cycle for Treating Osteoarthritis. 57, 9875-9879, doi:10.1002/anie.201806159 (2018).

6 Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F. & Luwel, M. Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the Association for Information Ence & Technology50, - (2010).

7 Zhang, T. et al. Research trends on the relationship between Microbiota and Gastric Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Cancer11, 4823-4831, doi:10.7150/jca.44126 (2020).

8 Li, S. et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Pediatric Liver Transplantation Research in PubMed from 2014 to 2018. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research26, e922517, doi:10.12659/msm.922517 (2020).

9 Athanasou, N. A., Quinn, J. & McGee, J. O. Leucocyte common antigen is present on osteoclasts. The Journal of pathology153, 121-126, doi:10.1002/path.1711530205 (1987).

10 McGinnes, K. et al. Growth and detection of human bone marrow B-lineage colonies. Blood76, 896-905 (1990).

11 Marini, J. C. & Forlino, A. Replenishing cartilage from endogenous stem cells. The New England journal of medicine366, 2522-2524, doi:10.1056/NEJMcibr1204283 (2012).

12 Nombela-Arrieta, C., Ritz, J. & Silberstein, L. E. The elusive nature and function of mesenchymal stem cells. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology12, 126-131, doi:10.1038/nrm3049 (2011).

13 Johnson, K. et al. A stem cell-based approach to cartilage repair. Science (New York, N.Y.)336, 717-721, doi:10.1126/science.1215157 (2012).

14 Bush, J. R. & Beier, F. TGF-β and osteoarthritis--the good and the bad. Nature medicine19, 667-669, doi:10.1038/nm.3228 (2013).

15 Ma, N., Teng, X., Zheng, Q. & Chen, P. The regulatory mechanism of p38/MAPK in the chondrogenic differentiation from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research14, 434, doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1505-2 (2019).

16 Park, M. J. et al. Metformin Augments Anti-Inflammatory and Chondroprotective Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Experimental Osteoarthritis. 203, 127-136, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800006 (2019).

17 Kalluri, R. & LeBleu, V. S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. 367, doi:10.1126/science.aau6977 (2020).

18 Zhang, S. et al. Exosomes derived from human embryonic mesenchymal stem cells promote osteochondral regeneration. Osteoarthritis and cartilage24, 2135-2140, doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.022 (2016).

19 He, L. et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes protect cartilage damage and relieve knee osteoarthritis pain in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Stem cell research & therapy11, 276, doi:10.1186/s13287-020-01781-w (2020).

20 Jin, Z., Ren, J. & Qi, S. Exosomal miR-9-5p secreted by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates osteoarthritis by inhibiting syndecan-1. Cell and tissue research381, 99-114, doi:10.1007/s00441-020-03193-x (2020).

21 Meng, Q. & Qiu, B. Exosomal MicroRNA-320a Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Regulates Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synoviocyte Activation by Suppressing CXCL9 Expression. Frontiers in physiology11, 441, doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00441 (2020).

22 Tikhonova, A. N. et al. The bone marrow microenvironment at single-cell resolution. Nature569, 222-228, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1104-8 (2019).

23 West-Livingston, L. N., Park, J. & Lee, S. J. The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00126 (2020).

24 Flood, P., Alvarez, L. & Reynaud, E. G. Free-floating epithelial micro-tissue arrays: a low cost and versatile technique. Biofabrication8, 045006, doi:10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045006 (2016).

25 Ahmad, T. et al. Fabrication of in vitro 3D mineralized tissue by fusion of composite spheroids incorporating biomineral-coated nanofibers and human adipose-derived stem cells. Acta biomaterialia74, 464-477, doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.035 (2018).

26 Lammers, T. & Sofias, A. M. Dexamethasone nanomedicines for COVID-19. 15, 622-624, doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0752-z (2020).

27 Ni, Z. et al. Exosomes: roles and therapeutic potential in osteoarthritis. Bone research8, 25, doi:10.1038/s41413-020-0100-9 (2020).