This review was designed to provide more insight into the process of evidence-informed policymaking based on implementation research regarding HIV control programme in Burkina Faso.
In accordance with what was already declared by Uneke and colleagues (7), implementation research remains one of the most effective processes for available or new health interventions for improving their access and use to improve programs. All the studies reviewed reported relevant relevant contribution to improving outcomes of HIV control programme. And almost all were cross-sectionl studies and depending on the type of the keywords used for the search.
It is of interest to note from this review that all of 21 selected studies were published after the year 2000. The annual mortality rate per 100,000 people living with HIV/AIDS in Burkina Faso has decreased by 52.9% since 1990, corresponding to an average of 2.3% per year; with a first significant decrease in 2000 for Burkina Faso and in 2005 for West African countries (24). The research results explain to what extent there has been a reduction in the morbidity and mortality rate related to HIV and HIV/AIDS prevalence over 30 years from 7% in 1986 to 0.8% 2016 (11). According to WHO (25), Implementation research is one of the most important interfaces between the availability of tools, strategies and interventions and their use in health systems and control programs. From this perspective, two main ideas are possible: what we have learned from the reduction of HIV/AIDS prevalence and what could be targeted in perspective.
From the present review, policy implementation was related to comprehensive health systems strengthening (HSS) as a strong vision (26), using holistic approach (including social sciences) (27), and with clear strategy and commitment from national and international decision makers (26). These desirable health systems could consider appropriate psychology as part of the care of people living with HIV (PLWHA), taking into account community-based organizations as suggested by Ky-Zerbo and colleagues (28). In addition for Bila and colleagues, a better understanding of the interaction between gender, HIV and the institutional organization of health care could help reduce men's reluctance to attend health care facilities (29). With the genre and equity perspectives, some authors showed that HIV control programmes have to target interventions among young female sex workers (FSW) mainly for part-time sex workers (PTSW) and their partners. From the learning from teachers, it emerged that the specific HIV prevention programmes in the education sector that specifically target women were needed (30). Indeed, the results showed that there is still a need to address stigma and discrimination, in particular the training of health care providers and law enforcement officials, and to authorize, fund, guide and monitor services for key populations. (31). Moreover, there is an urgent need to consider HIV prevention strategy in combination or not with other strategies for the general and key population: targeting prisoners, female sex workers (FSW) mainly for part-time sex workers (PTSW) and their partners (30), using HIV prevention campaigns, using Communication and Behavior Change (CBC) programme by peer-advisers (21). From the side of service delivrey, healthcare facilities have to offer a HIV continuum of care to key populations (32), to provide HIV testing and counselling including better protections against HIV exposure in the workplace, to follow HIV guidelines including ethical issues (33), and include care related to HIV co-infection and its consequences (34). Moreover, there is a need for strong quality implementation of prevention of mother-to-child transmission programmes (16, 18, 19) and for this to contribute to WHO guidelines. (18). According to Vergne and colleagues (22), the monitoring of antiretroviral (ARV) resistance in the population is necessary and should be included in all implementation programmes. That was the same concern from Somda and colleagues who call for closer monitoring of the antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme (10). Finally, for Windisch and his colleagues, integrating HIV/AIDS funding and responses into health systems is crucial from the outset to meet the challenge of sustainability (35); in particular support for training, supervision and infrastructure upgrading.
From this systematic review, we learned that some topics are insufficient or missing in research on HIV programme: HIV status of health workers and human resources shortage and competences; Equity analysis; Access to care; Quality of care; Quality of life and social approach in the health systems; Topics related to Health policy. In addition about this review, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been included in the HIV programme mainly for prevention. However, several regions of Burkina Faso have not been the subject of HIV research. And, there is insufficient monitoring and evaluation of HIV programme components at the country level.
One very interesting feature of all the studies reviewed is that they gave various information about the HIV control programme outcomes in localities and health facilities where the studies were undertaken. There is still a need to identify what works in rural community settings. According to WHO, implementation research will provide evidence for the adoption and optimal use of innovations for scaling up and increased engagement and investment (25). From this perspective, recommendations can be made in order to improve HIV control programme in Burkina Faso (Box 1). The recommendations have to be reviewed in accordance with WHO guidelines on the core elements of infection prevention and control (IPC) programmes at the national level and in the health care settings. (36). In this perspective, equity analysis could be taken into account through appropriate approaches (37, 38), and including strengthening multisectoral collaboration and partnerships when implementing and monitoring strategies and programmes (37).
Study limitations
As already stated by Uneke and colleagues in their study (7), this study had two main limitations. The first one is the exclusive use of PubMed for data extraction, one of the most remarkable and easily evaluable databases in the world for health science publications. Its unique use may have resulted in the absence of additional relevant publications. The second limitation of this study concerns the scope (Burkina Faso) of the publications reviewed giving an inappropriate to generalize the results.