Synthesis of benzylidene barbituric acid using Bi2O3 nanoparticles
This project mainly aimed to synthesize recyclable bismuth oxide nanoparticles using a facile, high-performance and pro-environmental method. The nanoparticles were used as the catalyst in the production process of the arylidene barbituric acid derivatives (Scheme 1).
The performance of Bi2O3 nanocatalyst was investigated using barbituric acid (2) and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (1j), as the model substrate. In order to optimize the reaction conditions, various weight percentage of catalyst and diverse solvents were exploited.
Firstly, the model reaction was performed solvent-free with no catalyst. As expected, the reaction did not happen noticeably. In addition, in another test, no reaction happened in the absence of the solvent and the presence of the catalyst (Table 1, Entry 1, 2). Afterwards, with the use of the catalyst (20 Wt%) and several solvents, which were different in terms of polarity and protic nature, such as methanol, ethanol, C2H5OH/H2O, chloroform, toluene, dichloromethane, and acetonitrile, the reaction was re-assessed. Monitoring the reaction revealed that the polar solvents such as methanol, ethanol, and acetonitrile were much effective than the non-polar ones. This might be attributed to the much better dispersion of the catalyst as well as much better solubility of the reagents in the polar solvents. In the next experiment, water as a green solvent was used and the reaction progress was assessed. It was found out that the synthesis of arylidene barbituric acid catalyzed by Bi2O3 nanostructure was progressed with higher yields (Table 1).
Table 1
Synthesis of 3j in the presence of different solvents and amounts of catalyst
Entry | Catalyst (W%) | Solvent | Time (h/min) | Temp. | Yield (%) |
1 | ---- | ----- | N.R | r.t. | --- |
2 3 | Bi2O3 20% ---- | ----- H2O | N.R 24 h | r.t. r.t. | --- 33 |
4 | Bi2O3 20% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 91 |
5 | Bi2O3 20% | EtOH | 3 min | r.t. | 40 |
6 | Bi2O3 20% | EtOH/H2O (1:1) | 3 min | r.t. | 36 |
7 | Bi2O3 20% | CH3OH | 3 min | r.t. | 35 |
8 | Bi2O3 20% | CH3CN | 3 min | r.t. | 32 |
9 | Bi2O3 20% | CHCl3 | 3 min | r.t. | 24 |
10 | Bi2O3 20% | CH2Cl2 | 3 min | r.t. | 23 |
11 | Bi2O3 20% | C7H8 | 3 min | r.t. | 18 |
12 | Bi2O3 5% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 73 |
13 | Bi2O3 10% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 87 |
14 | Bi2O3 15% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 89 |
15 | Bi2O3 25% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 58 |
16 | Bi2O3 30% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 52 |
17 | Bi2O3 35% | H2O | 2 min | r.t. | 46 |
Optimizing the consumption of Bi2O3 nanocatalyst showed that its concentration plays a decisive role in the reaction efficiency as such increasing the catalyst concentration from 5 to 20 W% raised the product yield. On the other hand, the catalyst concentrations above 20 W% reduced the yield. Consequently, the optimum level of the catalyst was set as 20 W% for the reaction at room temperature (Table 1).
After optimizing the catalyst, the reactions of different aldehydes with both electron-donating and withdrawing substitutions were studied. It was noticed that the nanocatalyst can catalyze their conversion to the corresponding products in high yields during short reaction time. In fact, electron-donating and withdrawing functional groups on the aromatic ring of aldehydes have no considerable effect on their reaction’s yields (Table 2).
Table 2
benzylidene barbituric acid derivatives obtained via the Knoevenagel condensation of benzaldehyde derivatives and barbituric acid using Bi2O3 nanocatalyst
Entry | Ar | | X | Product | Time (min) | Yield (%)a | \(\frac{\varvec{m}.\varvec{p}. (?)}{\varvec{O}\varvec{b}\varvec{s}\varvec{e}\varvec{r}\varvec{v}\varvec{e}\varvec{d} \varvec{R}\varvec{e}\varvec{p}\varvec{o}\varvec{r}\varvec{t}\varvec{e}\varvec{d} }\) | Ref |
1 | 2-OHC6H4- | | O | 3a | 3 | 93 | 248-250 249-250 | [39] |
2 | 4-MeOC6H4- | | O | 3b | 3 | 97 | 295-297 294-297 | [67] |
3 | 2-MeOC6H4- | | O | 3c | 3 | 90 | 267-269 268-269 | [39] |
4 | P-(Me)2NC6H4- | | O | 3d | 3 | 97 | 277-279 278-279 | [39] |
5 | C6H5CH=CH- | | O | 3e | 3 | 95 | 267-268 268 | [67] |
6 | 4-OHC6H4- | | O | 3f | 3 | 98 | >300 >300 | [67] |
7 | 2-NO2C6H4- | | O | 3g | 3 | 97 | 271-274 271-273 | [67] |
8 | 4-NO2C6H4- | | O | 3h | 3 | 76 | 269-271 268-270 | [39] |
9 | 2-ClC6H4- | | O | 3i | 3 | 96 | 250-252 249-251 | [67] |
10 | 4-ClC6H4- | | O | 3j | 3 | 94 | 298-300 298-300 | [67] |
11 | 3-NO2C6H4- | | O | 3k | 3 | 94 | 227-229 226-228 | [67] |
12 13 14 15 | C6H5- 3,4,5-(OCH3)3C6H2- 2,4-Cl2C6H3- 4-OH-3-OCH3C6H3- | | O O O O | 3l 3m 3n 3o | 3 3 3 3 | 96 98 95 97 | 250-252 249-252 249-250 238-250 268-270 265-270 292-293 293-294 | [67] [69] [57] [57] |
a Isolated yield. |
Compared to our previous reports on the production of benzylidene barbituric acid in the presence of Co3O4 nanocatalyst at 90°C, the results of this experiment are quite remarkable and promising in terms of the reaction conditions (i.e., aqueous medium, room temperature and short periods of time). In most cases, the magnet was stopped as soon as the catalyst was introduced into the reaction medium, and in most cases the reaction was completed in less than 3 minutes.
All the products were identified by infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and their melting points were compared with the reference data. For more certainty, the structure of the product “3m, 3n and 3o” was verified using 1H NMR spectroscopy as well.
For compound 3m, the main absorption peaks in FT-IR spectrum were appeared at the wavenumbers of 1654, 1733, 1751, 3240 and 3629 cm−1, which are attributed to C=C bond, two groups of C=O stretching vibration, sp2 C-H stretching and the secondary N-H stretching, respectively. In 1H NMR spectral analyses of this compound it was observed that two characteristic singlets in 𝛿 11.37 and 11.24 ppm for the NH groups of pyrimidine ring and other singlets at 𝛿 8.27 and 7.84 ppm due to aromatic protons and CH=C olefin proton and aromatic protons respectively. Also, two signals for the methoxy groups appeared in 𝛿 3.79 and 3.82 ppm. It indicated that barbituric acid was added successfully to 3,4,5-trimethoxy benzaldehyde and the compound “3m” was prepared.
5-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzylidene)pyrimidine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione (3m): Yield 98%. MP = 249-250 \(℃\). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3629, 3240, 1751, 1733, 1654. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.79 (s, OCH3), 3.82 (s, 2 OCH3), 7.84 (s, H-Ar), 8.27 (s, 1H, CH=C), 11.24 (s, NH), 11.37 (s, NH).
5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene)pyrimidine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione (3o): Yield 97%, MP = 293-294. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3277, 1748, 1696, 1664. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 3.83 (s, CH3O), 6.90 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.81 (dd, J = 8 Hz, 1.8 Hz, H-Ar), 8.47 (d, J = 2 Hz, H-Ar), 8.22 (s, H-Ar), 10.56 (s, OH), 11.14 (s, NH), 11.26 (s, NH).
5-(2,4-dichlorobenzylidene)pyrimidine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione (3n): Yield 95%. MP = 268-270 \(℃\). IR (KBr, cm−1): 3218, 1741, 1675. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.48 (dd, J = 8.4, 2 Hz, H-Ar), 7.53 (dd, J = 8.4, 2 Hz, H-Ar), 7.81 (d, J = 2 Hz, H-Ar), 8.21 (s, 1H, CH=C), 11.29 (s, NH), 11.49 (s, NH).
To investigate the potential of this catalytic procedure and to fulfill the requirements of green chemistry, the catalyst reusability was evaluated with regard to the model reaction. The product of each step was dissolved in warm ethyl acetate, and the catalyst was subsequently recovered by centrifuging. In order to remove tars more efficiently from the catalyst surface, it was rinsed with H2O twice and then used with no further purification in the next run. On the other hand, the solvent was removed by evaporation, and the product residue was gathered. The yields of four successive cycles from the first to fourth runs at room temperature were 98%, 95%, 93%, and 90%, respectively (Table 3). The results show no significant decrease in the performance of the recovered catalyst compared to the fresh state; hence, the catalyst could be reused several times successively.
Table 3
Reusability of the catalyst in the preparation of 5-benzylidene barbituric acid derivative of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde
Run | Yield of 3n (%) |
First of renewed catalyst | 98 |
Second of renewed catalyst | 95 |
Third of renewed catalyst | 93 |
Fourth of renewed catalyst | 90 |
The possible mechanism of barbituric acid and aryl aldehyde reaction, known as “Knoevenagel condensation”, is illustrated in scheme 2. The barbituric acid structure first converts to the enol form (keto-enol tautomerism in the first step) and it then attacks to the aldehyde (second step) activated by Bi2O3 nanocatalyst as a Lewis acid. Finally, the dehydration process leads to the final product (last step).