Serum lactate level predicts 6-months mortality in hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.19069/v1

Abstract

Background The prediction of prognosis is an important part of management in decompensated cirrhosis (DeCi) patients with high long-term mortality. Lactate is a known predictor of outcome in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of lactate in DeCi patients.

Methods We performed a single-center, observational, retrospective study of 456 DeCi patients extracted from hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine whether lactate was independently associated with the prognosis of DeCi patients. The AUROC was calculated to assess the predictive accuracy compared with existing scores.

Results Serum lactate level was significantly higher in nonsurviving patients than in surviving patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that lactate was a risk-independent factor 6-months mortality (odds ratio: 1.412, P=0.001). ROC curves were drawn to evaluate the prediction efficiencies of lactate for 6-months mortality (AUROC: 0.716, P<0.001). Based on our patient cohort, the new scores (MELD+ lactate score, Child-Pugh+ lactate score) had good accuracy for predicting 6-months mortality (AUROC=0.769, P<0.001; AUROC= 0.766, P<0.001). Additionally, the performance of the new scores was superior to those of existing scores (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion Serum lactate at admission may be useful for predicting 6-months mortality in DeCi patients, and the predictive value of the MELD score and Child-Pugh score were improved by adjusting lactate. Lactate should be part of the rapid diagnosis and initiation of therapy to improve clinical outcome.

Introduction

Liver cirrhosis has a high morbidity and mortality and leads to 1.03 million deaths per year, making it the 14th most common cause of death worldwide(1). In China, survival with cirrhosis is even less optimistic because many hepatitis B- and hepatitis C-infected patients progress to cirrhosis without effective antiviral therapy(2, 3). However, compensated cirrhosis is not easy to detect, and most patients are diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis (DeCi) in the hospital because of cirrhosis complications such as ascites, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. The 1-year mortality of liver cirrhosis varies greatly, from 1–57%, according to the complications of DeCi(4). Decompensated cirrhosis carries a poor prognosis because the median survival time is about 2 years, and it imposes a heavy burden on health-care costs, mainly due to the need for repeated hospital admissions(5). Although liver transplantation can significantly improve survival, it is not widely applied due to shortcomings in liver sources, costs, and technology(6). Therefore, it is necessary to use prognostic models to identify high-risk patients. Severity scores have been developed for DeCi patients admitted to the hospital or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) based on combinations of prognostic indicators(7–11). The Child–Pugh and end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores have been widely used to predict the outcomes of cirrhotic patients, but they have obvious deficiencies(12–15). Therefore, a simple and practicable parameter is necessary to boost the predictive efficiency of scores and to guide the choice of therapeutic measures.

Elevated lactate levels may be due to anaerobic metabolism and oxidative stress, in which case it is a marker of tissue hypoxia, or metabolic changes due to stress reactions by the release of epinephrine(16). A previous study indicated that higher lactate levels and reduced lactate clearance are associated with mortality in critically ill patients, especially in septic patients(17, 18). Sepsis and infections are common reasons for hospital admission in DeCi patients in China and are associated with poor outcomes(19). Lactate levels may be a useful tool for assessing the severity of disease in critically ill patients with cirrhosis admitted to the ICU. In a recent report, lactate levels and clearance were independently associated with short-term mortality in critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis, and the lactate-adjusted score was significantly better than the existing scoring system(11). However, the study populations have been dominated by Caucasians in Europe and the United States, and the most common cause of liver cirrhosis is alcohol. In the national population of cirrhosis caused by viral hepatitis, whether lactate levels can also serve as a prognostic indicator for DeCi patients is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic performance of lactate levels for 6-months mortality in DeCi patients admitted to the hospital in China to guide clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

Study design

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study conducted at a large tertiary public hospital in South China between January 2014 and December 2018. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Informed written consent was obtained from all the study participants.

 

Study population and setting

The study cohort included all patients aged ≥ 18 years with cirrhosis of the liver who were hospitalized due to any of the hepatic decompensations. Refusal to give consent, age <18 years, pregnancy, cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, hematologic disorders, and renal failure were exclusion criteria. Patients admitted for specific reasons (i.e. cirrhosis patients with hepatocellular carcinoma admitted for TACE, cirrhosis patients admitted for conditions unrelated to liver cirrhosis). All patients were treated following accepted recommendations and guidelines after admission to the hospital, and they were followed up until death or 6 months(20, 21).

 

Definitions.

The presence of DeCi was diagnosed according to clinical, biochemical, and radiological parameters; the presence of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and/or signs of portal hypertension; ultrasonography; variceal bleeding; and even histology at hospital admission. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) were diagnosed according to West Haven criteria, well-established criteria defined by the CLIF Consortium. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and ascites were diagnosed using the criteria proposed by the International Ascites Club and American Association for the Study of Liver Disease(22-24). The Child-Pugh score was calculated according to TBIL, albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), ascites status, and degree of HE. The MELD score was calculated using the formula: 3.78 x Ln (TBIL μmol/L) + 11.2 x Ln (INR) + 9.57 x Ln (creatinine μmol/L) + 6.43 × (constant for liver disease etiology =0, if cholestatic or alcoholic, otherwise =1).

 

Study protocol

Patients were enrolled in the study when they were hospitalized with decompensated cirrhosis. During the index hospitalization, data were collected and compiled regarding demographic profile, history, clinical features, presence of other comorbidities, etiology of the cirrhosis, type of decompensation, number of complications, and blood laboratory parameters at admission (white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), serum sodium (Na), creatinine (Cr), serum urea, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) from venous blood; lactate, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) from arterial blood). Patients were followed for 6 months to calculate survival using liver clinic records, institutional medical records or telephone conversations. Patients with incomplete follow-up were not included in the final analysis.

 

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was done by using MedCalc statistical software version 15.2.1 (MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium). Continuous and categorical variables were initially described as median (interquartile range [IQR]) and frequency (percentage [%]), respectively. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariate analysis was employed to demonstrate the independent predictors for the mortality rate of patients with DeCi. All variables that were found to be associated with mortality (P<0.10) were included as candidate variables in a forward conditional stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors for the prognosis of DeCi patients. The diagnostic accuracy of prognostic variables was examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with comparisons between areas under the ROC curves (AUROC), done with the De Long test. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using the cut-off point with the highest Youden index (sensitivity +specificity −1). All statistical tests were two-sided, and a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 405 patients hospitalized with DeCi from January 2014 to December 2018 in this retrospective study. Patient age ranged from 25 to 86 years (median: 53.5 years). The majority of the patients were male (302/456, 74.6%). Demographic and biochemical characteristics of the study population are outlined in Table 1. The predominant etiology of liver cirrhosis was hepatitis, in 62.0% of patients (251/405), followed by alcoholic (14.8%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (8.4%). The most common decompensation events responsible for hospitalization were gastrointestinal hemorrhage (61.2%), infection (23.2%), hepatic encephalopathy (8.1%), and ascites (7.4%). The average length of hospital stay was 10 (8-12) days. Sixty-eight patients (16.7%) received treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 337 (83.2%) patients received treatment in the general ward. A total of 298 patients had been followed up to 6 months, including 84 patients who died. The causes of death were as follows: 15 (17.9%) from respiratory failure, 39 (46.4%) patients from hemorrhagic shock, 9 (10.7%) patients from hepatic encephalopathy, 8 (9.5%) patients from infectious shock, 5 (5.9%) patients from hepatorenal syndrome, 4 (4.8%) patients from liver failure, and 4 (4.8%) patients from uncertain causes. The baseline characteristics of this cohort are presented in Table 1.

 

Association between mortality and clinical or laboratory characteristics.

The clinical and laboratory characteristics of these patients are listed in Table 2. DeCi patients were divided into nonsurviving (n=84) and surviving groups (n=214) according to 6-month survival outcomes. The majority of nonsurvivors had been graded higher, as reflected by ALT, AST, bilirubin, GGT, creatinine, INR, PTA, WBC, Lac, Child-Pugh score, and MELD score. However, albumin levels were lower in nonsurvivors. No significant differences in platelet, serum Na, MAP, or PO2/FiO2 were detected.

 

Univariate and multivariate analysis for 6-months mortality in DeCi patients

When index hospitalization variables were compared, univariate logistic regression analysis showed that >50 years of age, cryptogenic cirrhosis, 3rd-degree ascites, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ALT, AST, bilirubin, GGT, creatinine, INR, PTA, WBC, Lactate, Child-Pugh score, and MELD score were risk factors and albumin was a protection factor for 6-months mortality in patients with DeCi. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that >50 years of age, HCC, GGT, creatinine, and Lactate were risk factors and albumin was a protective factor for 6-months mortality in patients with DeCi. No significant effect was noted for sex, cause of hospitalization, ACLF, acute renal injury, platelets, serum Na, mean arterial pressure, or PaO2/FiO2.

 

Predictive value for 6-months mortality in DeCi patients

Figure 1 shows the performance analysis of the discriminative accuracy of Lac for 6-months mortality with AUROC of 0.716 (95% CI: 0.649-0.784, P<0.001). The AUROC of MELD score and Child-Pugh score were 0.723 (95% CI: 0.654-0.791, P<0.001) and 0.679 (95% CI: 0.613-0.744, P<0.001), respectively. The ROC curves and comparison of prognostic scores are shown in Figure 1 and Table 4, respectively.

 

Predictive value of MELD score and Child-Pugh score are improved by adjusting lactate

To improve the predictive value, new scores (MELD+ lactate score, Child-Pugh+ lactate score), created by adding lactate to the MELD score and Child-Pugh score, were established. In the same dataset, an analysis of AUROC at 6-months mortality showed that MELD+ lactate score and Child-Pugh+ lactate score were superior to MELD score and Child-Pugh score, respectively (difference between areas=0.045, 95% CI= 0.017-0.073, Z=3.191, P=0.001; difference between areas=0.087, 95% CI= 0.043-0.131, Z=3.874, P<0.001). The ROC curve and comparison of prognostic scores are shown in Figure 2 and Table 5, respectively.

Discussion

Assessment of prognosis, especially in patients with cirrhosis at the hospital, is of crucial importance to guide therapeutic measures(25). To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MELD score and Child–Pugh score in patients with liver cirrhosis(13, 26). As we expected, MELD score and Child-Pugh score were associated with 6-months prognosis in the univariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression also identified that albumin and creatinine, which are parameters of the MELD score, as predictive factors for 6-months mortality. The ROCs of the MELD score and Child-Pugh score were drawn, and the AUROC of those scores was 0.723 and 0.679, respectively. However, they have had obvious deficiencies in previous studies. First, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, included in the Child–Pugh score, are subjective and may vary according to the physicians’ judgment and the use of diuretics and lactulose. Second, INR, which is one component of both Child-Pugh and MELD scores, does not sufficiently reflect coagulopathy and consequently liver function in liver cirrhosis(15). Third, there is an interlaboratory variation in INR value(14). Most studies on the MELD score and Child-Pugh score have been done in Western countries, where the main cause of cirrhosis is alcohol(27-29). However, in this study, virus hepatitis-related cirrhosis and gastrointestinal bleeding, which account for most of the cirrhotic population in China, may reduce the prediction efficiency of the score. Therefore, it is meaningful to find a simple and practicable indicator to increase predictive efficiency of score to guide clinical treatment.

Serum lactate levels, being closely associated with tissue hypoxia and anaerobic metabolism, are additionally strongly correlated with death(18, 30). Various studies provide considerable evidence for the prognostic value of lactate in critically ill patients(31, 32). Hyperlactemia at the time of admission to the hospital has been proposed to be a potential marker for postoperative morbidity and mortality with a high sensitivity and specificity for adverse effects(33). Serum lactate levels are currently used in risk stratification of patients with sepsis, trauma and pulmonary embolism(34-36). Several studies have revealed that the lactate level has been associated with mortality among patients admitted to the ICU in cirrhotic patients. Andreas Drolz’s study revealed that lactate appropriately reflected the severity of disease and organ failure and was independently associated with short-term mortality in critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis after nearly one year of follow-up, and the performance of chronic liver failure consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure score (CLIF-C ACLFs) was significantly improved by adjusting lactate(11). Adnan Tas’s multinational research has revealed that the lactate level and acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score are the two best predictive factors of short-term mortality in cirrhotic elderly patients admitted to the ICU(37). However, their study populations were dominated by Caucasians in Europe and the United States, and most cases of liver cirrhosis in those populations are caused by alcohol. In Zhou XD’s study of 949 critically ill cirrhotic patients with acute respiratory failure, a new score (ARF-CLIF-SOFA) score contained serum lactate and had better accuracy for predicting 30-days, 90-days and 1-year mortality compared to the MELD score and Chronic liver failure - sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score(38). Sun DQ’s research revealed that elevated serum lactate levels were associated with a higher mortality rate in critically ill patients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI)(39). However, their study did not clearly reveal that lactate levels were associated with prognosis in decompensated cirrhosis patients in China. Therefore, we designed and completed the study reported here. Our study was a single-center, large sample, observational retrospective analysis that evaluated simple laboratory parameters as predictors of mortality in DeCi patients. This paper aimed to validate the predictive value of lactate for 6-month mortality in compensated cirrhosis (DeCi) admitted to the hospital. First, we found that lactate was significantly higher in nonsurviving patients than in surviving patients (Table 2) and served an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis (Table 3). More importantly, our results indicated that lactate was able to predict long-term mortality in DeCi patients (Table 4, and Figure 1) and that the AUROC of the new scores (MELD+ lactate score, Child-Pugh+ lactate score) were higher than those of the MELD score and Child-Pugh score, respectively, based on the same data (Table 4, and Figure 1). Our findings demonstrate that lactate is also a good and independent predictor of long-term outcomes in DeCi patients of the Chinese population, whose cirrhosis is mainly caused by viral hepatitis.

The underlying mechanisms by which serum lactate can predict the prognosis of patients with DeCi are not well defined. Lactate is considered the main end-product of anaerobic glycolysis (Embden–Meyerhof pathway), where nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide is regenerated by the glycolytic lactate dehydrogenase system upon redox-coupled reduction of pyruvate to lactate(40). Approximately ~1500 mmol of lactate is produced daily in the human body, primarily by highly glycolytic tissues(41). Traditionally, lactate has been deemed a marker for tissue hypoxia, and the generation and consumption of lactate are strictly balanced in physiological conditions. Hyperlactatemia is usually the result of either increased lactate production or reduced consumption(42). The liver is responsible for up to 70% of whole-body lactate clearance, especially hepatic impairment, which is associated with increased lactate levels due to impaired mitochondrial oxidation(43). Another source of hyperlactatemia is increased lactate production, which is related to microcirculatory oxygen imbalance(41). Patients with unstable hemodynamics demonstrate increased ketone/pyruvate ratios and decreased arterial ketone body ratios related to anaerobic production. Previous studies revealed that in the absence of circulatory delivery relative to systemic metabolic demand, microcirculatory processes hampering oxygen utilization at the tissue level may raise lactate levels(44). Circulatory failure is also considered a complication related to mortality in critically ill cirrhotic patients(45). Furthermore, mechanisms other than tissue hypoxia can account for hyperlactatemia, such as drugs and intoxicants and pyruvate dehydrogenase dysfunction(46). Hence, we assume that the relationship between blood lactate and prognosis of DeCi patients is the result of comprehensive effects on metabolism and microcirculation.

This study has several limitations. First, as a single-center, retrospective cohort study, the study may have inherent limitations, and some patients were lost to follow-up, which may have resulted in selection bias. The findings need to be confirmed in large, multicenter, prospective studies. Second, we were not able to evaluate the predictive role of dynamic changes of lactate, as the long-term changes in serum lactate and lactate clearance were not routinely measured in clinical practice. Finally, organ failure-related scores, such as SOFA score and CLIF-C ACLFs, were not calculated, and the correlation between these scores and lactic acid was not analyzed.

In conclusion, many factors may be useful as a predictor of mortality in the hospital in patients with DeCi, including MELD score and Child-Pugh score. Our results indicate that initial lactate concentration strongly and independently predicts long-term outcomes. In terms of prognostic value, lactate levels demonstrate a similar discriminatory power as the MELD score and Child-Pugh score, and the predictive efficiency of those existing scores is elevated by adding lactate. From a clinical perspective, using lactate might be more convenient, as fast diagnosis and initiation of therapy are essential in reducing mortality.

Declarations

Author Contributions

YZ and YN contributed equally to this study. YZ and YN designed and wrote the manuscript. SZW collected the data, CL analysed the data, XZ critically revised the manuscript.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81660110) and the “Gan-Po Talent 555” Project of Jiangxi Province.

Conflict of Interest statement: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the “Gan-Po Talent 555” Project of Jiangxi Province for the economic support.

Reference

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095-128.
  2. Wang SB, Wang JH, Chen J, Giri RK, Chen MH. Natural history of liver cirrhosis in south China based on a large cohort study in one center: a follow-up study for up to 5 years in 920 patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(12):2157-62.
  3. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):151-71.
  4. D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1):217-31.
  5. Stepanova M, De Avila L, Afendy M, Younossi I, Pham H, Cable R, et al. Direct and Indirect Economic Burden of Chronic Liver Disease in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(5):759-66 e5.
  6. Cardenas A, Gines P. Management of patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Gut. 2011;60(3):412-21.
  7. Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of prognosis of cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28(1):110-22.
  8. Chen RC, Cai YJ, Wu JM, Wang XD, Song M, Wang YQ, et al. Usefulness of albumin-bilirubin grade for evaluation of long-term prognosis for hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(3):238-45.
  9. Saliba F, Ichai P, Levesque E, Samuel D. Cirrhotic patients in the ICU: prognostic markers and outcome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013;19(2):154-60.
  10. Zhu S, Waili Y, Qi X, Chen Y, Lou Y, Chen B. Serum C-reactive protein predicts early mortality in hospitalized patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(4):e5988.
  11. Drolz A, Horvatits T, Rutter K, Landahl F, Roedl K, Meersseman P, et al. Lactate Improves Prediction of Short-Term Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Cirrhosis: A Multinational Study. Hepatology. 2019;69(1):258-69.
  12. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464-70.
  13. Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD. J Hepatol. 2005;42 Suppl(1):S100-7.
  14. Trotter JF, Olson J, Lefkowitz J, Smith AD, Arjal R, Kenison J. Changes in international normalized ratio (INR) and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) based on selection of clinical laboratory. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(6):1624-8.
  15. Bedreli S, Sowa JP, Gerken G, Saner FH, Canbay A. Management of acute-on-chronic liver failure: rotational thromboelastometry may reduce substitution of coagulation factors in liver cirrhosis. Gut. 2016;65(2):357-8.
  16. Garcia-Alvarez M, Marik P, Bellomo R. Sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):503.
  17. Haas SA, Lange T, Saugel B, Petzoldt M, Fuhrmann V, Metschke M, et al. Severe hyperlactatemia, lactate clearance and mortality in unselected critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(2):202-10.
  18. Zhang Z, Xu X. Lactate clearance is a useful biomarker for the prediction of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis*. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(9):2118-25.
  19. Piano S, Bartoletti M, Tonon M, Baldassarre M, Chies G, Romano A, et al. Assessment of Sepsis-3 criteria and quick SOFA in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections. Gut. 2018;67(10):1892-9.
  20. Nadim MK, Durand F, Kellum JA, Levitsky J, O'Leary JG, Karvellas CJ, et al. Management of the critically ill patient with cirrhosis: A multidisciplinary perspective. J Hepatol. 2016;64(3):717-35.
  21. Olson JC, Wendon JA, Kramer DJ, Arroyo V, Jalan R, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Intensive care of the patient with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2011;54(5):1864-72.
  22. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(14):1787-847.
  23. Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P, Pavesi M, Angeli P, Cordoba J, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(7):1426-37, 37 e1-9.
  24. Kircheis G, Nilius R, Held C, Berndt H, Buchner M, Gortelmeyer R, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of L-ornithine-L-aspartate infusions in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy: results of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Hepatology. 1997;25(6):1351-60.
  25. Fuhrmann V, Whitehouse T, Wendon J. The ten tips to manage critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(11):1932-5.
  26. Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV, Vangeli M, Terreni N, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Systematic review: The model for end-stage liver disease--should it replace Child-Pugh's classification for assessing prognosis in cirrhosis? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(11-12):1079-89.
  27. Kartoun U, Corey KE, Simon TG, Zheng H, Aggarwal R, Ng K, et al. The MELD-Plus: A generalizable prediction risk score in cirrhosis. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186301.
  28. Kamath PS, Kim WR, Advanced Liver Disease Study G. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology. 2007;45(3):797-805.
  29. Angeli P, Gines P. Hepatorenal syndrome, MELD score and liver transplantation: an evolving issue with relevant implications for clinical practice. J Hepatol. 2012;57(5):1135-40.
  30. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Schoonderbeek FJ, Sleeswijk Visser SJ, van der Klooster JM, Lima AP, et al. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(6):752-61.
  31. Husain FA, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Elliott DC. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg. 2003;185(5):485-91.
  32. Vincent JL, Quintairos ESA, Couto L, Jr., Taccone FS. The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):257.
  33. Hatherill M, Salie S, Waggie Z, Lawrenson J, Hewitson J, Reynolds L, et al. The lactate:pyruvate ratio following open cardiac surgery in children. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(5):822-9.
  34. Vanni S, Socci F, Pepe G, Nazerian P, Viviani G, Baioni M, et al. High plasma lactate levels are associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(8):830-5.
  35. Guyette F, Suffoletto B, Castillo JL, Quintero J, Callaway C, Puyana JC. Prehospital serum lactate as a predictor of outcomes in trauma patients: a retrospective observational study. J Trauma. 2011;70(4):782-6.
  36. Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Hollander JE, Birkhahn R, Otero R, Osborn TM, et al. A prospective, multicenter derivation of a biomarker panel to assess risk of organ dysfunction, shock, and death in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1):96-104.
  37. Tas A, Akbal E, Beyazit Y, Kocak E. Serum lactate level predict mortality in elderly patients with cirrhosis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012;124(15-16):520-5.
  38. Zhou XD, Chen QF, Zhang MC, Van Poucke S, Liu WY, Lu Y, et al. Scoring model to predict outcome in critically ill cirrhotic patients with acute respiratory failure: comparison with MELD scoring models and CLIF-SOFA score. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11(9):857-64.
  39. Sun DQ, Zheng CF, Lu FB, Van Poucke S, Chen XM, Chen YP, et al. Serum lactate level accurately predicts mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(11):1361-7.
  40. Doherty JR, Cleveland JL. Targeting lactate metabolism for cancer therapeutics. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(9):3685-92.
  41. Kruse O, Grunnet N, Barfod C. Blood lactate as a predictor for in-hospital mortality in patients admitted acutely to hospital: a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:74.
  42. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Lactic acidosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(24):2309-19.
  43. Scheiner B, Lindner G, Reiberger T, Schneeweiss B, Trauner M, Zauner C, et al. Acid-base disorders in liver disease. J Hepatol. 2017;67(5):1062-73.
  44. De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois MJ, Sakr Y, Koch M, Verdant C, et al. The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(2):403-8.
  45. Fede G, Privitera G, Tomaselli T, Spadaro L, Purrello F. Cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28(1):31-40.
  46. Stacpoole PW, Wright EC, Baumgartner TG, Bersin RM, Buchalter S, Curry SH, et al. A controlled clinical trial of dichloroacetate for treatment of lactic acidosis in adults. The Dichloroacetate-Lactic Acidosis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(22):1564-9.

Tables

Table 1. Patients’ Characteristics of DeCi Cohort

Variable

Decompensated patients with Cirrhosis

(n = 405)

Sex (man), n (%)

302(74.6%)

Age, median (IQR)

53.5(46-63.75)

Hospitalization days, median (IQR)

10(6-12)

Intensive care unit (%)

68(16.7%)

Cause of liver cirrhosis, n (%)

 

   Viral

251(62.0%)

   Alcoholic

60(14.8%)

   Combined alcoholic+ viral

32(7.9%)

   Other

28(6.9%)

   Cryptogenic

34(8.4%)

Cause of hospitalization, n (%)

 

   Ascites

30(7.4%)

   Gastrointestinal hemorrhage

248(61.2%)

   Hepatic encephalopathy

33(8.1%)

   Infection

94(23.2%)

Ascites degree

 

   No ascites

165(40.7%)

   1st-degree ascites

109(26.9%)

   2nd-degree ascites

80(19.8%)

   3rd-degree ascites

51(12.6%)

Acute renal failure, n (%)

14(3.5%)

Hepatocellular carcinoma, n (%)

36(8.8%)

Therapy, n (%)

 

   Vasopressor support

127(31.3%)

   Mechanical ventilation

27(6.6%)

   Renal replacement therapy

2(4.9%)

6-months outcome, n (%)

 

   Loss to follow-up

107(26.4%)

   Survivors

214(52.8%)

   Nonsurvivors

84(16.8%)

IQR: interquartile range

 

Table 2 The association between clinical or laboratory characteristics and mortality in DeCi patients

Parameter

Survivors

Nonsurvivors

P-Value

ALT, IU/L

23(17-36)

26(15-56)

0.040

AST, IU/L

35.5(26-53)

58(36-168)

<0.001

Albumin, g/L

29.1(25.925-32.1)

25.7(22.8-29.5)

<0.001

Bilirubin, mmol/L

21.9(14.3-37.475)

29.5(19.6-57.2)

0.004

GGT, IU/L

21(13-48)

37(17-106)

0.003

Creatinine, mmol/L

71.45(57.7-86.075)

91.9(63.4-132.6)

<0.001

INR

1.31(1.19-1.487)

1.4(1.24-1.76)

<0.001

PTA

14.7(13.025-16.4)

15.4(13.7-19.9)

<0.001

Platelets, 10*9/L

64(41-92.75)

70(37-109)

0.419

WBC, 10*9/L

6.295(3.805-9.432)

7.75(4.42-13.57)

0.003

Na, mmol/L

138.6(136-141.15)

138.5(135-142)

0.967

MAP, mmHg

82.667(79-88)

83.667(77.667-89.33)

0.909

PO2/FiO2, mmHg

411(349.25-480.5)

391(301-452)

0.060

Lactate, mmol/L

1.7(1.3-2.4)

3(1.6-4.75)

<0.001

Child-Pugh score

8(7-9)

9.5(8-11)

<0.001

MELD score

10(9-14)

14(11-19.5)

<0.001

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).

ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; INR: international normalized ratio; PTA: prothrombin activity; WBC: white blood cell count; MAP: mean artery pressure; PO2/FiO2: oxygenation index; MELD: model for end-stage liver disease.

 

Table 3: Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors associated with mortality for 6-months days

Variable

Univariate

Multivariate

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Sex

 

 

   

Male

Reference

 

 

 

Female

1.140(0.650-2.000)

0.648

 

 

Age

       

   ≤50

Reference

 

Reference

 

   >50

1.852(1.052-3.261)

0.033

2.193(1.044-4.630)

0.038

Cause of liver cirrhosis

       

   Viral

Reference

     

   Alcoholic

1.148(0.555-2.375)

0.710

   

   Combined alcoholic viral

1.060(0.391-2.556)

0.909

   

   Other

1.330(0.538-3.288)

0.537

   

   Cryptogenic

2.296(0.985-5.138)

0.043

   

Cause of hospitalization

       

   Ascites

Reference

     

   Gastrointestinal hemorrhage

2.616(0.162-42.381)

0.498

   

   Hepatic encephalopathy

2.750(0.137-55.166)

0.508

   

   Infection

1.003(0.053-18.915)

0.997

   

Ascites degree

       

   No ascites

Reference

     

   1st-degree ascites

0.781(0.400-1.527)

0.470

   

   2nd-degree ascites

1.086(0.510-2.312)

0.830

   

   3rd-degree ascites

2.227(1.107-4.483)

0.025

   

ACLF

1.122(0.778-3.332)

0.835

   

AKI

1.065(0.637-1.692)

0.682

 

 

HCC

1.977(1.386-2.821)

<0.001

5.882(2.155-15.873)

0.001

ALT

1.002(1.001-1.004)

0.012

   

AST

1.003(1.001-1.005)

0.009

   

Albumin

0.881(0.832-0.933)

<0.001

0.885(0.822-0.952)

0.001

Bilirubin

1.010(1.004-1.016)

0.001

   

GGT

0.997(0.994-1.000)

0.031

1.003(1.000-1.006)

0.023

Creatinine

1.003(1.001-1.017)

<0.001

1.007(1.000-1.013)

0.040

INR

5.437(2.563-11.536)

<0.001

   

PTA

1.144(1.074-1.220)

<0.001

   

Platelets

1.003(0.999-1.006)

0.146

   

WBC

1.059(1.018-1.101)

0.004

   

Na

1.014(0.981-1.048)

0.417

   

MAP

1.004(0.999-1.009)

0.142

   

PO2/FiO2

0.998(0.996-1.000)

0.054

0.997(0.994-1.000)

0.087

Lactate

1.283(1.130-1.634)

<0.001

1.412(1.142-1.745)

0.001

Child-Pugh score

1.322(1.169-1.495)

<0.001

   

MELD score

1.162(1.102-1.226)

<0.001

   

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; ACLF: acute-on-chronic liver failure; AKI: acute renal injury; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; INR: international normalized ratio; PTA: prothrombin activity; WBC: white blood cell count; MAP: mean arterial pressure; PaO2/FiO2: oxygenation index; MELD: model for end-stage liver disease.

 

Table 4: Comparison of prognostic scores in predicting 6-months mortality

Prognostic score

ROC Area

Asymptotic Sig

Cut-off point

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PLV

NLV

Lactate, mmol/L

0.699

<0.0001

2.6

79.16

56.98

1.84

0.37

MELD score

0.723

<0.0001

12

67.62

67.44

2.08

0.48

Child-Pugh score

0.679

<0.0001

8

64.76

63.95

1.8

0.55

MELD: model for end-stage liver disease; PLV: positive likelihood ratio; NLV: negative likelihood ratio.

 

Table 5: Comparison of prognostic scores in predicting 6-months mortality

Prognostic score

ROC Area

Asymptotic Sig

Cut-off point

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

PLV

NLV

MELD+ lactate

0.769

<0.0001

15.8

76.67

67.44

2.35

0.35

Child-Pugh+ lactate

0.766

<0.0001

10

59.52

79.07

2.84

0.51

MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; PLV: Positive likelihood ratio; NLV: Negative likelihood ratio.