DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-96879/v1
Background
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains are one of the most important life-threatening nosocomial pathogens. In the current study, antibiotic resistant, virulence-associated genes, gene expression of efflux pumps and biofilm genes as well as molecular typing of K. pneumoniae strains were investigated. A total of 505 clinical specimens were collected from hospitalized patients and K. pneumoniae strains were isolated by standard microbiological methods. Antibiotic resistant profile, prevalence of virulence associated genes, biofilm and efflux pump genes were investigated. The gene expression analysis of biofilm and efflux pump genes were analused quantitative Real Time PCR. Moreover, molecular typing of K. pneumoniae strains using Repetitive element sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) technique was also carried out.
Results
One hundred K. pneumoniae strains out of 500 clinical samples were isolated and the highest prevalence of resistance was observed against ciprofloxacin (75%), Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (73%) and Nitrofurantoin (38%). Virulence associated genes including entB, traT and rmpA were found in 80%, 62% and 48%, respectively. Gene prevalence for biofilm association gene including mrkA, fimH and mrkD were 42% for all genes. The AcrAB, TolC and mdtK efflux pump genes were observed in 41%, 33% and 26%, respectively. In addition, most MDR strains formed biofilm, as well as, AcrAB efflux pump and mrkA biofilm gene expression was up-regulated in MDR K. pneumoniae strains and a significant statistically association was also observed between MDR strains and high expression of efflux pump and biofilm genes. In addition, the K. pneumoniae strains differentiated into 11 different genetic clusters by rep-PCR analysis.
Conclusions
High prevalence of resistance, presence of diver’s virulence factors and high level of efflux pump and biofilm gene expression in diverse clones of K. pneumoniae strains pose an important public health issue.
Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative pathogen belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family [1]. K. pneumoniae can cause various infections such as urinary tract infections, pneumonia and bloodstream infections and it is considered as an important nosocomial pathogen in Iran [2]. K. pneumoniae has recently attracted the attention of researchers due to the increased severity of infections, antibiotic resistance and treatment deficiencies [3, 4]. The increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumoniae in recent years is mainly due to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics to treat and prevent infections caused by this bacterium [5]. K. pneumoniae uses a variety of mechanisms to resist antibiotics [6]. One of the important mechanisms for creating the MDR is efflux pump systems and biofilm formation capacity [7]. Efflux pumps are protein based structure which capable extrude the different toxic substances out of cells and the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump system which belongs to the Resistance Nodulation Division (RND) efflux pump which is an important cause of MDR of K. pneumoniae strains occurrence [8–11]. The AcrAB-TolC efflux pump is composed a periplasmic component (AcrA), a transporter located in the inner membrane (AcrB) and an outer membrane compartment (TolC). The AcrAB-TolC efflux pump plays an important role in developing resistance to various antibiotics such quinolones, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol in MDR strains of K. pneumoniae [12]. The ability to form biofilms in K. pneumoniae strains, allows it to protect against the host immune system and antibiotics in MDR isolates and there are a lot of biofilm related genes including mrk (type 3 fimbriae), fimH-1 (type 1 fimbrial adhesion) [13, 14]. Studies show that the efflux pump plays an important role in antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation [15]. There are several studies showed a correlation of K. pneumoniae antibiotic resistance, efflux pump and biofilm formation ability [16]. In the study of Subramanian et al, 2012, indicated that 80% of biofilm forming isolates from 100 clinical samples showed an MDR phenotype [17]. Various Virulence factors such as those encoding regulators of mucoid phenotype A (rmpA), bacteriocin biosynthesis [enterobactin (entB), and serum resistance-associated outer membrane lipoprotein (traT) play an important role in the pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae strains [18].
Molecular typing of K. pneumoniae strains can be used to prevent infection in the hospital and also to find the dominant genotype among the isolates can be useful in finding the source of infection and applying prevention protocols [19, 20]. Due to the high prevalence of MDR strains of K. Pneumoniae in Iran, the aim of this study was to investigate the antibiotic resistance profile and distribution of virulence genes in K. Pneumoniae strains, efflux pump and biofilm gene expression, as well as, molecular typing of K. pneumoniae strains using Repetitive element sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR).
A total of 505 clinical specimens including urine, blood, sputum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected from hospitalized patients were admitted to Baghiatallah and Imam Khomeini hospitals in Iran from January 2018 to July 2019. The K. pneumoniae strains were identified using conventional microbiological tests including catalase, MR-VP (methyl red – Voges Proskauer), lysine iron agar, Kligler agar, phenylalanine agar, urea agar, SIM (sulfide, indole, motility), blood agar, and MacConkey agar [21]. The isolated strains were stored at -20 0C in brain heart infusion broth containing 20% glycerol for further investigation.
Antibiotic susceptibility of K. pneumoniae strains was evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard based on to Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [22]. The antimicrobial susceptibility assays to 17 antibiotics were performed using commercially available antibiotics including ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), streptomycin (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Imipenem (10 μg), co-trimoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (AMC, 20/10 μg), Meropenem (10 μg), clindamycin (30 μg), polymixin B (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) (MAST, Group Ltd., Merseyside, UK). The plates were incubated at 37 0C for 24 hours and subsequently, the inhibition zone diameters were recorded in millimeter and interpretation was done based on CLSI. K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 was used as a control in this study. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains were identified based on their resistance to at least one drug in three different groups of antibiotics.
The phenotypic and qualitative detection of the efflux pump in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains was performed by Cartwheel method. Briefly, the plates of Muller Hinton Agar culture media containing ethidium bromide were prepared and the culture medium was divided into 8 parts and the bacteria in 0.5 McFarland turbidity concentration were streaked on plates. After 24 h of incubation at 37 0C, the plates were studied under UV transilluminator. The strains that had efflux pumps did not show emission of fluorescence [23].
Phenotypic detection of biofilm formation was performed using Congo red agar test. Briefly, the K. pneumoniae strains was cultured in Brain Heart Infusion agar enriched with 5% (w/v) sucrose and Congo red based on Freeman et al. 1989. The K. pneumoniae strains which formed biofilm exhibited a dry dark crystalline colonies and considered as exopolysaccharides producers [24].
Quantitative biofilm detection test was performed by plate microtiter method in 96 house plate. In summary, first 100 μl of 24-hour culture of strains with OD = 0.1 were added into wells. After 24 h incubation, each well was washed twice with PBS and then, stained with crystal violet for 15 min.
Finally, the stained cells were solubilized in 33% (v/v) acetic acid and their adsorption was read at 570 nm OD 570 nm. Based on the type of biofilm, the strains of biofilm former were divided into three categories: strong biofilm, moderate biofilm, weak biofilm and negative biofilm producers. In addition, the standard strain K. pneumoniae ATCC 13833 and LB broth was considered as a positive and negative control, respectively [25].
The genomic DNA of the strains was extracted by the DNA extraction kit (Bioneer, Korea) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The frequency of entB, Trat and rmpA virulence gene, mdtk, tolC and AcrAB efflux pump, fimH-1, mrkA and mrkB biofilm associated genes were detected by PCR. The PCR conditions were as follow: Initial denaturing at 94 0C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles, each cycle contained 1 min at 94 0C for denaturation, 30 second for annealing (Table 1) and 60 S for extension steps and finally one cycle for final extension at 72 0C for 10 min. The primer of target genes are given in Table 1.
Target gene |
Primer sequence (5/ to 3/) |
Annealing Temperature (0C) |
Reference |
AcrAB |
F ATCAGCGGCCGGATTGGTAAA R CGGGTTCGGGAAAATAGCGCG |
53 |
[26] |
TolC |
F ATCAGCAACCCCGATCTGCGT R CCGGTGACTTGACGCAGTCCT |
51 |
[26] |
Mdtk |
F GCGCTTAACTTCAGCTCA R GATGATAAATCCACACCAGAA |
43 |
[26] |
mrkA |
F ACGTCTCTAACTGCCAGGC R TAGCCCTGTTGTTTGCTGGT |
55 |
[16] |
mrkD |
F CCACCAACTATTCCCTCGAA R ATGGAACCCACATCGACATT |
43 |
[27, 28] |
fimH |
F GCCAACGTCTACGTTAACCTG R ATATTTCACGGTGCCTGAAAA |
43 |
[26] |
entB |
F CTGCTGGGAAAAGCGATTGTC R AAGGCGACTCAGGAGTGGCTT |
49 |
[26] |
traT |
F GGTGTGGTGCGATGAGCACAG R CACGGTTCAGCCATCCCTGAG |
55 |
[28] |
rmpA |
F ACTGGGCTACCTCTGCTTCA R CTTGCATGAGCCATCTTTCA |
53 |
[29] |
16S rRNA |
F AGCCGACCTGAGAGGGTGA R TCTGGACCGTGTCTCAGTTCC |
55 |
[30] |
AcrAB efflux pump and mrkA biofilm gene expression analysis was done using quantitative Real Time PCR method in K. pneumoniae strains. Briefly, 100 µl of each bacterium was added into 96 well plate and incubated for 18 h at 37 0C aerobically. Then, each well was washed using PBS and adherent cells were scraped off using LB broth. Subsequently, total RNA of collected strains were extracted using an RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, USA) according to instruction protocol.
The extracted RNA was converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) by a cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentase, Lithuania) based on manufacturer’s instructions. In order to perform the Real Time PCR, each cDNA was used as a template in 20 µl final volume containing 2 μl cDNA, 10 pmol of each primer (Table 1), and 10 µl Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using Bioneer Real-Time PCR equipment (Korea). The 16S rRNA was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize the levels of mRNA expression and the relative expression of AcrAB efflux pump gene was calculated using ΔΔCт method.
Molecular typing of K. pneumoniae strains was done using the Repetitive element sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) method. The rep-PCR was performed using two following primers: Forward: REP1 5’– III ICG ICG ICA TCI GGC-3’ Reverse: REP2 5’– ICG ICT TATCIG GCC TAC-3’ as described previously. The PCR amplification products were visualized using electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel and stained with safe red. Finally, the banding patterns and size were determined via Image Lab 4.0. The obtaining results were analyzed by gel compare II software using Dice correlation coefficient and the UPGMA method [31].
All tests of this study are repeated three times and one way ANNOVA test was used for statistical analysis. In addition, P <0.05 was also considered significant.
A total of 100 K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from 505 clinical samples. The 100 K. pneumoniae strains were recovered from specimens of urine (n=70), blood (n=20), Sputum (n=6) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, n=4) based on routine microbiological methods. Among 100 clinical strains of K. pneumoniae, 75 (75%), 73 (73%) and 68 (68%) of strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and Nitrofurantoin, respectively and 28 (28%), 52 (52%) strains were susceptible to streptomycin and imipenem, respectively (Table 2). In addition, 92 (92%) strains revealed MDR phenotypes and most MDR strains were resistant to imipenem, meropenem and beta-lactam antibiotics. The studied strains were categorized into 25 antimicrobial resistant patterns (Table 2).
Phenotypic detection of biofilm formation was done using Congo red agar test and our results showed that 77% (77 strains) of isolates exhibited black colonies, which presumably indicate biofilm formation (Fig 1A). The other strains formed white colonies which reflecting no biofilm formation. Moreover, the Cartwheel results showed that 90% (90 isolates) of strains had efflux pumps (Fig 1B).
Isolates NO.
|
Antibiotic resistant pattern |
Anti-biotype (AB) |
MDR |
Biofilm former |
Mean OD 570 |
Phenotypic efflux pump |
10, 17, 23, 73, 92, 98 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, FOX, NA, CP, FM, TE, S, GM |
AB1 |
+ |
+ |
2.63±0.14 |
+ |
15, 20 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, FOX, NA, CP, FM, TMP |
AB2 |
+ |
- |
0.025±0.03 |
+ |
1, 6, 13, 25 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, FOX, TMP, GM, S |
AB 3 |
+ |
+ |
2.13±0.19 |
+ |
4, 12, 21, 74, 77, 94 |
CAZ, FOX, FM, TE, TMP, S |
AB 4 |
+ |
+ |
3.52±0.21 |
+ |
18, 35, 49 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, FOX, FM, TMP |
AB 5 |
+ |
+ |
0.76±0.06 |
+ |
3, 16, 22 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, NA, CP |
AB 6 |
+ |
+ |
0.38±0.08 |
+ |
8, 45, 75 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, FOX, NA, CP, FM, TE |
AB 7 |
+ |
+ |
2.69±0.17 |
+ |
5, 41, 76 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, FOX, NA, CP, AMC, CF, S, FM, TMP, IMP, GM, MEN |
AB 8 |
+ |
+ |
3.4±0.12 |
+ |
19, 31, 72 |
CTX, CAZ, CRO, NA, CP, FM, TMP, GM, S |
AB 9 |
+ |
+ |
1.8±0.07 |
- |
7 |
AMC, S, CF, TMP |
AB 10 |
+ |
+ |
0.17±0.16 |
+ |
9, 28, 87 |
FM, CF, AMC, K, GM, TMP, CP, AN, FOX, CTX, CRO, CAZ |
AB 11 |
+ |
+ |
0.81±0.007 |
+ |
24, 26, 40 |
S, CF, AMC, FM, IPM, TMP, MEN, NA, CP |
AB 12 |
+ |
- |
0.16±0.003 |
+ |
14, 39 |
CL, TE, PB, AN, TMP, GM, K, S, FM, AMC, CF |
AB 13 |
+ |
+ |
0.15±0.006 |
+ |
41, 59, 61, 93 |
AMC, CF, FM, PB, CL, TE |
AB 14 |
+ |
+ |
0.94±0.007 |
- |
36, 43 |
CP, TE, NA, FM, MEN, TMP, CF, AMC |
AB 15 |
+ |
+ |
0.16±0.006 |
+ |
53, 81, 96 |
CF, AMC, MEN, TMP, IPM, CP, NA |
AB 16 |
+ |
+ |
0.20±0.13 |
+ |
27, 30, 62, 88 |
FM, AMC, CF, IPM, AN, MEN, GM, TMP, CP, TE, NA, CL |
AB 17 |
+ |
+ |
0.19±0.001 |
+ |
2, 11, 60, 78, 100 |
CF, AMC, TMP, CP, TE, NA |
AB 18 |
+ |
+ |
0.13±0.006 |
+ |
50, 80, 85, 86 |
AMC, FM, CF, CP, TE, NA, MEN, IPM, TMP, GM, AN |
AB 19 |
+ |
+ |
2.13±0.003 |
+ |
48, 52, 58, 65 |
AMC, S, CF, FM, IPM, MEN, CP, NA |
AB 20 |
+ |
+ |
3.82±0.009 |
+ |
33, 47, 71, 56, 83, 69 |
CF, K, FM, AMC, GM, MEN, IPM, AN, TMP, NA, TE, CP |
AB 21 |
+ |
+ |
0.19 ±0.007 |
+ |
34, 42, 99 |
AMC, CF, FM, IMP, MEN, TMP, CP, NA, TE |
AB 22 |
+ |
+ |
1.45±0.008 |
- |
44, 50, 54, 7, 66, 79, 97, 63, 64, 70, 82
|
CAZ, CRO, FOX, K, FM, AMC, CF, AN, TMP, GM, IMP, MEN, CP, TE, NA |
AB 23 |
+ |
- |
0.02±0.002 |
+ |
29, 32, 51, 55, 57, 68, 84 |
CP, TE, NA, TMP, GM, IMP, MEN, AMC, FM, CF, CAZ, CTX, CRO, FOX |
AB 24 |
+ |
- |
0.029±0.001 |
+ |
30, 89, 90, 91, 37, 38, 46, 95 |
CF, AMC |
AB 25 |
- |
+ |
0.56±0.001 |
+ |
CF: Chloramphenicol, AMC: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, FOX: Cefoxitin, CRO: Cefteriaxon, CTX: Cefotaxime, CAZ: Ceftazidime, FM: Nitrofurantoin, MEN: Meropenem, IMP: Imipenem, GM: Gentamycin, TMP: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, NA: Nalidixic acid, TE: Tetracycline, CP: Ciprofloxacin, S: Streptomycin, K: Kanamycin, CL: Clindamycin, PB: Polymixin B, S: Streptomycin, |
The results of quantitative biofilm production test is shown in Table 2 as mean OD 570 values. According to OD values among 77% biofilm producers, 50 isolates (71%) were categorized strong biofilm former (OD> 0.204), 16 (20%) as moderate biofilm former (0.102<OD<0.204) and 11 isolates (14%) as weak biofilm former (0.0551<OD<0.102). There are a significant between MDR phenotype, biofilm formation and efflux pump among K. pneumoniae strains (P<0.05). Moreover, there was a significant correlation between biofilm formation in isolates recovered from urine comparing to other type specimens (P<0.05).
The prevalence of biofilm, efflux pump and virulence associated genes are given in Table 3. The mrkA, mrkD and fimH genes encoding type 1 and type 3 fimbrial adhesion engage in biofilm formation were present in all biofilm former strains. Moreover, the efflux pump genes including AcrAB, TolC and mdtK were observed 41 (41%), 33 (33%) and 26 (26%) strains, respectively. The AcrAB was more prevalent in K. pneumoniae strains comparing to other efflux pump genes. In addition, the AcrAB efflux pump gene was more prevalent in urine samples comparing to other clinical specimens.
In addition, the virulence related genes including enterobactin biosynthesis gene (entB), outer membrane protein coding gene (traT) and mucoid phenotype A (rmpA) was seen in 80 (80%), 62 (62%) and 48 (48%) strains, respectively. As reported in Table 3, analysis of selected genes showed that biofilm was more pronounced among virulence associated gene positive than among negative strains. The entB virulence gene was detected in all blood, CSF and sputum isolates. There were 8 virulence profiles (V1-V8) Based on virulence detected gene and V1 was the most prevalent virulence type.
Isolate NO |
Biofilm association genes |
Efflux pump genes |
Virulence association gene |
Virulence gene Type |
Type of samples |
||||||
mrkA |
mrkD |
fimH |
AcrAB |
TolC |
mdtK |
entB |
TraT |
rmpA |
|||
1 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
2 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
3 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
4 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
6 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
7 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
8 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
9 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
V5 |
Urine |
10 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
11 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
12 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
13 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
14 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
15 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
16 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
17 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
18 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
19 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
20 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
21 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
22 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
23 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
24 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
V6 |
Urine |
25 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
26 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
V5 |
Urine |
27 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
28 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
29 |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
30 |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
V5 |
Urine |
31 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
32 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
V7 |
Urine |
33 |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
34 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
35 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
36 |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
37 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
38 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
39 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
40 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Urine |
41 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
42 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
43 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
44 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
V6 |
Urine |
45 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
46 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
47 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
48 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Urine |
49 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
V7 |
Urine |
50 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
51 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Blood |
52 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
53 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Sputum |
54 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V6 |
Blood |
55 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Blood |
56 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Blood |
57 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
58 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Blood |
59 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Urine |
60 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
61 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Blood |
62 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
CSF |
63 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
V6 |
Urine |
64 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Sputum |
65 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Blood |
66 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Sputum |
67 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
V7 |
Urine |
68 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Blood |
69 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
70 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Blood |
71 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
V7 |
Urine |
72 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
CSF |
73 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
74 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
75 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V3 |
Blood |
76 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
77 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Blood |
78 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Urine |
79 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Blood |
80 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Blood |
81 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
CSF |
82 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Urine |
83 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Blood |
84 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
85 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Blood |
86 |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Sputum |
87 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Blood |
88 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Blood |
89 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
90 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Sputum |
91 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Urine |
92 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Urine |
93 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Blood |
94 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
+ |
V4 |
Urine |
95 |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
96 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Blood |
97 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
V1 |
Urine |
98 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
CSF |
99 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
V2 |
Blood |
100 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
V8 |
Sputum |
The eight MDR (1, 6, 10, 13, 17, 18, 23 and 25 isolates NO.) and non-MDR (30, 37, 38, 46, 89, 90, 91 and 95 isolates NO.) selected K. pneumoniae strains were used for AcrA and mrkA gene expression analysis. The results of Real Time PCR showed that AcrA and mrkA gene were up-regulated significantly in MDR isolates comparing to non-MDR isolates. There was a significant relationship between MDR isolates, AcrA and mrkA gene expression (P<0.05) (Figure 2).
According to the dendrogram, Repetitive element sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) revealed 11distinct patterns of K. pneumoniae isolates (Figure 3). The 11 rep genotypes were designed rep1 to rep11. The rep type 4-7 were the most common and, followed by type rep 1, 9 and 3, which consisted non-MDR isolates (Group I: 30, 95, 90, 91, Group C: 37, 89, Group J: 38 and 46 isolates NO). The rep 5 type was unique and each contained one strain exclusively. Based on statistical correlation tests, the rep 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 significantly correlates with MDR strains and virulence patterns (P<0.05). The strains showed high similarity which may suggest that those isolates consist a clonal lineage (P<0.05).
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) K. pneumoniae strains are an important cause of several life-treating infections, worldwide [32]. The extensive use of antimicrobial agents led to a high prevalence of MDR K. pneumoniae strains [33]. The increasing rate of K. pneumoniae strains resistant to multiple antimicrobials is a global public health problem [34]. In this study, the prevalence of MDR K. pneumoniae isolates was 92%. The high rate of MDR strains was also shown in other studies. Moreover, 48% and 47% of K. pneumoniae strains were resistant to imipenem and meropenem, respectively. From the results, it can be concluded that there has been a significant increase in carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae isolates in Iran. It seems that the production of carbapenemase and metallobetalactamase have an important role in carbepenems resistance [35]. Our results is supported by some previous reports. Manjula et al, indicted 90.2% of isolates were MDR and the majority of MDR strains were resistant to a high range of antibiotics including penicillin, cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone, aminoglycoside, and sulfonamide [36].
One of the possible reason for high rate of antimicrobial resistance is lack of strict policies for use of antibiotics in Iran. Another mechanism of multidrug resistant is efflux pumps which used by K. pneumoniae strains [37]. The efflux pumps could reduce the intracellular concentration of antibiotics which is as an important cause of bacterial survival [38]. In our study, the AcrAB efflux pump is most common efflux pump in K. pneumoniae strains comparing to mdtk and it was significantly correlated with MDR phenotype. Our results are consistent with other reports which indicated that the multidrug efflux pump system (AcrAB-TolC) in K. pneumoniae strains is responsible for antibiotics especially fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin, tetracycline and beta-lactam antibiotics in MDR isolates.
In addition, 77% of K. pneumoniae strains were biofilm former and 89% of biofilm former were MDR. Until now, it has been shown a significant correlation between MDR phenotype and the biofilm forming ability of K. pneumoniae strains [39]. In addition, the relationship between antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation has also been studied in strains grown under the antibiotic dose especially in sub-minimum inhibitory concentration [40]. There was a significant relationship between strains of K. pneumoniae isolated from urine and biofilm formation. Most of urine originate strains exhibited strong biofilm capacity. In the current study, K. pneumoniae strains isolated from clinical specimens harbored high prevalence of efflux pump, biofilm and virulence associated genes. The virulence associated genes were also dominant in MDR strains. Type 1 fimbriae (fimH-1) and Type 3 fimbrial adhesion (mrkA and mrkD) are the most common bacteria cells adhesive agent which can mediate the binding of K. pneumoniae strains to endothelial and epithelial cells of urinary tracts cause to urinary tract infections [41, 42]. Type 3 fimbrial adhesion plays an important role in the biofilm formation of K. pneumoniae strains, however, their exact role in the biofilm formation remains unclear [43]. The results of Nirwati et al, 2019 study on biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae strains isolated from clinical samples showed that 85.63% of the strains were biofilm and that is more than the results of our study [44]. In our study, the fimH, mrkA and mrkD were detected in all types of urine, blood and CSF isolates especially in urine isolates. The enterobactin biosynthesis gene (entB), serum resistance-associated outer membrane lipoprotein (traT) and regulators of mucoid phenotype A (rmpA) were detected in 80%, 62% and 48% of K. pneumonia strains. The traT gene encodes an outer membrane protein which plays an important role in conjugation and inhibition of complement cascade and act as invasin [45]. Molecular typing of bacteria is a very suitable method for differentiation of microbial pathogens and among the typing methods, rep-PCR technique is widely used for genotyping of bacterial strains. [46]. In our study, out of 100 K. pneumoniae strains, rep-PCR could differentiated into 11 distinct patterns and most MDR strains were put in the same patterns. Our data confirmed the Lai et al results which showed pathogenic K. pneumoniae strains are heterogeneous, because of variation in genome sequences [47]. Our results showed the correlation of MDR strains with rep-PCR patterns. However, the rep-PCR revealed no statistically significant correlation with virulence type. In addition, the rep-PCR results showed that the same rep-type in two studied hospitals indicated that the same clonal distribution of K. pneumoniae in two hospitals. Our findings can help to interpretation of MDR K. pneumoniae outbreaks associated with specific patterns in the future.
In our study, we reported the high prevalence of MDR K. pneumoniae strains with resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, the ability to formed biofilm and presence of efflux pump, biofilm and virulence associated genes which can be a great barrier to treatment of K. pneumoniae related infections. Moreover, high genetic similarity of MDR strains in hospitals showed clonal dissemination of K. pneumoniae strains that requiring control tools. However, further studies are needed to investigate other epidemiological aspects of the K. pneumoniae strains.
RND: Resistance Nodulation Division
MDR: multidrug-resistant
rep-PCR: Repetitive element sequence-based PCR
CSF: cerebrospinal fluid
MR-VP: (methyl red – Voges Proskauer)
CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
All quantitative data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Molecular Biology Research Center, System Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Amir Mirzaie, Reza Ranjbar
R. R conceive and designed the experiments. A. A performed the experiments, analyzed the results, done the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Reza Ranjbar
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran permitted this study with number: IR.BMSU.REC.1397.056. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in this study.
Not applicable.
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.
This study was supported by the ministry of health and medical education, Tehran, Iran.
Research reported in this publication was supported by a grant provided from the ministry of health and medical education, Tehran, Iran.