Role of verbal and non-verbal communication of health care providers in general satisfaction with birth care: A cross-sectional study in government health settings of Erbil City, Iraq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.19076/v1

Abstract

Background Effective communication by maternity care staff can help a woman during labor and birth have a positive birth experience. Nothing is known about this topic in Iraqi Kurdistan, therefore, this study assessed: 1) The level of women’s satisfaction regarding verbal and non-verbal communication of midwives and physicians in the delivery room and 2) the association between this satisfaction level and socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics of the women and their general satisfaction with care during labor and delivery.

Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on a convenient sample of 1196 women recruited between January and March 2019 from Erbil city, Iraq, who gave birth in the last year. Data were collected from women through direct interview. A questionnaire which included sociodemographic, obstetrical information and 28 items related to verbal and non-verbal communication of physicians and midwives in the delivery room was used. Chi-square tests were used to find the association between dependent and independent variables.

Results Although 58.4% of the women were generally satisfied with communication of midwives and physicians in the delivery room, a large percentage (41.6%) were not satisfied. Only 14.6% and 27.3% of the women were completely satisfied with verbal and non-verbal communication of health care providers, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between women’s satisfaction with care during labor and their satisfaction with health care providers’ communication; 70.4% of women who were satisfied with care during birth were also satisfied with the communication of delivery room staff. There were statistically significant associations between the satisfaction of women with the communication of midwives and physicians and their level of education, parity, having stillbirth or neonatal death, and the setting of the last delivery.

Conclusions Women’s satisfaction with verbal and nonverbal communication of health care providers in the delivery room is associated with their satisfaction with birth care. Improving communication skills of health care providers can be a considerable part of improving care in delivery room.

Plain English Summary

Effective communication by maternity care staff is an important factor for women’s satisfaction with care during labor and delivery. This study assessed women’s satisfaction with communication from health care providers including physicians and midwives in the delivery room. 1196 women participated. Results show that a relatively small percent of women were completely satisfied with the communication, although more than half of the women were generally satisfied with the communication. 70.4% of those women who were satisfied with care during birth were also satisfied with communication of the delivery room staff. We concluded that women’s satisfaction with verbal and nonverbal communication of health care providers in the delivery room is associated with their satisfaction with birth care.

Background

Delivery is one of the most important events in a woman’s life, and one in which mental and physical stress is unavoidable[1]. This event is recognized as having deep mental, social, and emotional aspects that remain in the mother’s consciousness forever; therefore, unpleasant events during delivery can have a negative long-term mental effect [2, 3].

During parturition, mothers need attention, understanding, empathy, guidance, and support in addition to clinical care [4]. Relevant studies show that a pivotal factor for a positive delivery experience is the comprehensive support of midwives. On the other hand, weak midwife communication skills could potentially have deleterious effects on physical, mental, social, and economical aspects of healthcare [1].

Effective communication by maternity care staff can help a woman during labor and birth to have a positive birth experience [5]. Childbirth can be a frightening experience for many women, but it should also be a joyous occasion and every woman should feel valued, respected, and appreciated by those who aid her in her journey of bringing new life into the world [6]. Effective communication between maternity care providers and women in labor, using simple and culturally acceptable methods, is recommended by the World Health Organization [7]. Therefore, enhancement of physicians’ and midwives’ communication skills is of key importance to promote the health of expecting mothers [8].

Studies performed in maternity wards showed that appropriate communication could be the main determining factor for satisfaction of mothers with the provided care [9]. An effective relationship between midwives and mothers can result in enhanced satisfaction, lowered blood pressure, anxiety, and pain, an increased sense of security, mutual trust, and interaction, an improved ability to make an informed decision, a reduced fear of a vaginal birth, an enhanced sense of assurance, better control of the delivery process, and most importantly, improved health [10].

Patient satisfaction is an important and commonly used indicator for measuring the quality of health care. Patient satisfaction affects clinical outcomes, patient retention, and medical malpractice claims. It affects the timely, efficient, and patient-centered delivery of quality health care. Patient satisfaction is thus a proxy but a very effective indicator to measure the success of doctors and hospitals [11].

Studies show that younger women, women with a low education level, rural residents and primiparas reported discrimination and unfriendly behaviors by providers and staff in the delivery room. As a result, they were not satisfied with their labor care [1214]. No research has been conducted on this subject in the Kurdistan region of Iraq; therefore, I investigated midwives’ and physicians’ communication skills in the delivery room in Erbil city, Iraq. This study assessed 1) the level of women’s satisfaction regarding verbal and non-verbal communication of midwives and physicians in the delivery room; 2) the association between this satisfaction and sociodemographic characteristics of the women; and 3) the association between women’s satisfaction and their general satisfaction with care during labor and delivery.

Methods

Study population

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Erbil city, in the Kurdistan region of Iraq during the period of January 20, 2019 to March 15, 2019. The inclusion criteria were having at least one birth experience (a vaginal delivery) within the past year, either in Rezgary hospital, a Maternity Teaching Hospital or Malafandy, a primary health center in Erbil city. Both of these institutions are public health settings.  Women who delivered in a private hospital, had a psychological problem or were not interested in participating were excluded. Through convenient sampling, 1500 women were approached to participate in the study; 1234 met the inclusion criteria and 1196 women agreed to participate. These women were either accompanying another person to the hospital or health center, or coming to immunize one of their children.

Data collection

Data were collected through direct interview after we received informed consent. The purpose of the study was explained to the women and they were assured that all personal information would remain confidential. Three midwifery students helped the researcher with data collection after they were trained on how to interview women and collect the data.

A questionnaire was developed by the author after a massive review of literature which included two main parts: sociodemographic and obstetrical characteristics such as age, educational level, occupation, residency, parity, history of abortion, sex of the baby, admission of the baby to the ICU and 28 items related to verbal (16 items) and non-verbal (12 items) communication of physicians and midwives in delivery room [13-18].

Outcome variables

Responses to 28 items about the verbal and non-verbal communication of providers were scored as follows: a response of not satisfied was awarded 1 point, a response of don’t know was awarded 2 points, and a response of satisfied was awarded 3 points. After obtaining the overall satisfaction of women, we summarized the results into two groups: satisfied and unsatisfied. Those who were not satisfied and “don’t know” were merged together as don’t know indirectly implied that women were not satisfied. Only a small percentage of the sample had allocated themselves to the “don’t know” group. Those with a score of less than 56 (the midpoint between the minimum 28 and maximum 84) were considered as not satisfied and those with a score 57 to 84 were considered satisfied.

For each verbal and non-verbal communication item, a response of not satisfied was awarded 1 point, a response of partly not satisfied was awarded 2 points, and responses of satisfied and completely satisfied were awarded 3 and 4 points, respectively. Overall satisfaction was divided into four groups:  completely not satisfied (those who received a total score of 16 points on the questionnaire, corresponding to not satisfied on every question), partly not satisfied (those who received a score between 17-32 points), partially satisfied (a total score of 33-47 points) and completely satisfied (a total score of 48 points, indicating complete satisfaction on every one of the 16 items). For non-verbal communication items, the total score for the corresponding four categories were: 12 points, 13-24 points, 25-35 points, and 36 points, respectively.

A separate question was asked regarding the general satisfaction with care during labor with three response of yes, no or partially.

Exposure variables

Exposure variables were age, educational level, occupation, residency, parity, having an abortion and stillbirth or neonatal death, the sex of the baby, admission of the baby to the ICU, having an episiotomy, and place of last delivery (a maternity hospital, Rezgary Hospital or Malafandi Center). The baby’s sex, admission to the ICU, having an episiotomy and place of delivery described the mother’s most recent delivery. Age was grouped as less than 20 years (which was considered an adolescent), 20 to 29, 30 to 39, and 40 or more years old. For educational level, basic means finishing 9 years of education, secondary means completing 12 years of education, and institute and BSc includes those who finished 2 years or more at a university. Residency is divided as urban which is Erbil city, suburban which includes towns within a half hour to one hour’s drive from Erbil city, and rural, including towns and villages beyond the suburban areas. As most Kurdish women are housewives, occupation was grouped as housewife, employed or students. Parity was grouped as primipara (had one delivery), multipara (2 to 4 deliveries) and grand multipara (5 and more deliveries).

Statistical analysis

Frequency, percentage and chi-square tests were used for data analysis. The association of general satisfaction with care during labor (yes, no, or partially) was examined with a patient’s total satisfaction with the communication of their health care providers. A chi-square test was used to find the association between dependent and independent variables. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered as significant.  Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS program (Version 21). 

The study was approved by the Scientific Committee of the College of Nursing/Hawler Medical University.

Results

The sociodemographic characteristics of the study sample were as follows: almost half of the study sample was aged between 20–29 years old, The highest percentage (40.8%) graduated from basic school, more than half (54.4%) were from an urban area, and the majority of participants (92.8%) were housewives. The highest percentage (62.5%) of the women were multigravida, 34.2% had a history of abortion, 91.2% had no history of stillbirth or neonatal death, 63.6% experienced episiotomy or laceration during their most recent delivery and only 13.1% of their babies were admitted to the hospital NICU after delivery (Table 1).

Table 1
Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics of the study sample (N = 1196, Erbil city, Iraq, 2019)
Variables
No.
%
Age group (years)
- less than 20
- 20–29
- 30–39
- 40 or more
93
597
445
61
7.8
49.9
37.2
5.1
Education level
- illiterate
- read and write
- basic
- secondary
- institute /BSc*
268
168
488
139
133
22.4
14.0
40.8
11.6
11.1
Residency
- urban
- suburban
- rural
651
340
205
54.4
28.4
17.1
Occupation
- housewife
- employed
- student
1110
59
27
92.8
4.9
2.3
Parity
- primipara
- multipara
- grand multipara
238
748
210
19.9
62.5
17.6
Number of abortions
- no abortion
- 1–2
- 3 and more
787
356
53
65.8
29.8
4.4
Number of stillbirths
- 0
- 1
- 2–3
1091
88
17
91.2
7.4
1.4
Episiotomy & laceration (in most recent delivery)
- yes
- no
761
435
63.6
36.4
Sex of baby
- male
- female
589
607
49.2
50.8
Admission to NICU**
- yes
- no
157
1039
13.1
86.9
*BSc = Baccalurius degree, **NICU = Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Table 2 shows the satisfaction of participants with verbal and non-verbal communication of midwives and physicians during their labor and delivery. More than half of the study sample were not satisfied with this verbal communication: “introduce self” (66.5%), “greeted the patient” (61.7%), “checked the patient’s understanding” (58%), “asked whether patient had other issues or concerns” (50.2%). Regarding non-verbal communication more than half of the women were satisfied with most of these items. The highest percentage (43.7%) of the women not satisfied was for the item “maintain a patient’s privacy during the physical examination.”

Table 2
Participant satisfaction with verbal and nonverbal communication of the midwives and physicians during their labor and delivery (N = 1196, Erbil city, 2019)
Verbal communication
Not Satisfied
Don’t know
Satisfied
The provider…
No
%
No
%
No
%
greeted the patient
738
61.7
22
1.8
436
36.5
offered a seat to the patient
461
38.5
25
2.1
710
59.4
introduced self to the patient
795
66.5
38
3.2
363
30.4
used the patient’s name
448
37.5
36
3
712
59.5
used open questions to encourage the patient to freely provide information about her concerns
385
32.2
42
3.5
769
64.3
encouraged the patient to speak as long as she needed to convey what she considered important
363
30.4
55
4.6
778
65.1
verbally confirmed that they would respond to the patient’s request
342
28.6
92
7.7
762
63.7
carefully listened to the patient
283
23.7
82
6.9
831
69.5
spoke in a calm and gentle manner
269
22.5
68
5.7
859
71.8
used simple language that was easy to understand
266
22.2
69
5.8
861
72
explained the examination and assessment
547
45.7
94
7.9
555
46.4
explained patient’s health problems and diagnosis
573
47.9
103
8.6
520
43.5
discussed treatment options and offered choices
507
42.4
105
8.8
584
48.8
provided information tailored to the patient’s problems and concerns
537
44.9
95
7.9
564
47.2
checked the patient’s understanding of information
693
58
101
8.4
402
33.6
asked whether the patient had other issues or concerns she would like to discuss
600
50.2
105
8.8
491
41.1
Nonverbal communication
           
had a neat and tidy personal appearance
304
25.4
168
14
724
60.5
made the patient feel welcome
415
34.7
74
6.2
707
59.1
displayed patience when visiting with the patient
320
26.8
82
6.9
794
66.4
maintained good eye contact with the patient
323
27
95
7.9
778
65.1
used facial expressions to convey interest and attention
312
26.1
97
8.1
787
65.8
used a caring and attentive body posture when approaching the patient
300
25.1
87
7.3
809
67.6
used a professional tone of voice that also conveyed empathy and caring
306
25.6
104
8.7
786
65.7
listened carefully and not interrupt the patient while speaking
315
26.3
62
5.2
819
68.5
used nonverbal cues while listening to show attentiveness and empathy
337
28.2
71
5.9
788
65.9
encouraged the patient to keep talking with posture and facial expressions
333
27.8
68
5.7
795
66.5
maintain a patient’s privacy during the physical examination
522
43.7
81
6.8
593
49.6
visit patients individually rather than grouping them together
390
32.6
100
8.4
706
59

Although 58.4% of the women were generally satisfied with the communication of midwives and physicians in the delivery room, a large percentage (41.6%) were not satisfied. Only 14.6% and 27.3% of the women were completely satisfied with verbal and non-verbal communication of their health care providers, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3
Overall satisfaction of women with communication of midwives and physicians during their labor and delivery (N = 1196, Erbil city, 2019)
Level of satisfaction with communication
No. (%)
Overall satisfaction
- not satisfied
- satisfied
497(41.6)
699(58.4)
Overall verbal communication
- completely not satisfied
- partially not satisfied
- partially satisfied
- completely satisfied
51(4.3)
477(39.9)
493(41.2)
175(14.6)
Overall non-verbal communication
- completely not satisfied
- partially not satisfied
- partially satisfied
- completely satisfied
42(3.5)
402(33.6)
426(35.6)
326(27.3)

As Table 4 shows, there were statistically significant associations between the satisfaction of women with the communication of their midwives and physicians and the women’s level of education (p = 0.021), parity (p = 0.002), and having a stillbirth (p = 0.023), as well as a highly significant association with the place of their last delivery (p = < 0.001). The same table shows that there was a statistically significant association between women’s satisfaction with their care during labor and their satisfaction with their health care providers’ communication (p = < 0.001). 70.4% of those women who were satisfied with care during birth were also satisfied with the communication of the delivery room staff.

Table 4
Association between sociodemographic, obstetrical characteristics and birth outcome satisfaction with overall communication satisfaction (N = 1196, Erbil city, 2019)
Variables
Overall satisfaction with provider communication
P-value
Not satisfied
No(%)
Satisfied
No(%)
Age group
- less than 20
- 20–29
- 30–39
- 40 and more
35(37.6)
264(44.2)
181(40.7)
17(27.9)
58(62.4)
333(55.8)
264(59.3)
44(72.1)
0.066
Level of education
- illiterate
- read and write
- basic
- secondary
- institute /BSc
103(38.4)
74(44)
185(37.9)
68(48.9)
67(50.4)
165(61.6)
94(56)
303(62.1)
71(51.1)
66(49.6)
0.021
Occupation
- housewife
- employed
- student
460(41.4)
25(42.4)
12(44.4)
650(58.6)
34(58.6)
15(55.6)
0.944
Residency
- urban
- suburban
- rural area
261(40.1)
140(41.2)
96(46.8)
390(59.9)
200(58.8)
109(53.2)
0.230
Parity
- primipara
- multipara
- grand multi para
120(50.4)
284(38)
93(44.3)
118(49.6)
464(62)
117(55.7)
0.002
Number of stillbirths
- none
- one
- two to three
461(42.3)
26(29.5)
10(58.8)
630(57.7)
62(70.5)
7(41.2)
0.023
Number of abortions
- none
- one to two
- three and more
336(42.7)
106(40.2)
55(37.9)
451(57.3)
158(59.8)
90(62.1)
0.492
Admission to NICU*
- yes
- no
74(47.1)
423(40.7)
83(52.9)
616(50.3)
0.128
Sex of baby
- male
- female
247(41.9)
250(41.2)
342(58.1)
357(58.8)
0.793
Place of last delivery
- a maternity hospital
- Rezgary Hospital
- Malafandi Center
429(39.1)
66(71.7)
2(25)
667(60.9)
26(28.3)
6(75)
< 0.001
Had episiotomy
- yes
- no
324(42.6)
173(39.8)
437(58.4)
262(60.2)
0.344
Generally satisfied with care during birth
- yes
- no
- partially
276(29.6)
177(93.7)
44(60.3)
658(70.4)
12(6.3)
29(39.7)
< 0.001
*NICU = neonatal intensive care unit

Discussion

In the present study, 1196 women were examined to find out their satisfaction with the communication of physicians and midwives during their labor and delivery and its relation with their overall satisfaction with received related care. The results show that the majority of women who were satisfied with their care were also satisfied with the communication of their health care providers. Only 4.3% and 3.5% of women were completely satisfied with all verbal and nonverbal communication items measured, respectively. Satisfaction with this communication was greater among women who were multigravida and grand multipara. As the women’s education level increased, their satisfaction with the communication decreased which may due to this fact that educated women have a better understanding of the kind care possible given by health care providers. Age was not a significant factor in the satisfaction of women with communication.

In general, patients expected their health care providers to keep up timing , behave cordially, and communicate in the patient’s native language [11]. They expected care, concern, and courtesy in addition to professionalism [11].  A patient's favorable attitudes toward their doctor were related to the patient’s health status[19]. According to published research findings, a patient's expectations of good service depend on her age, the nature of her illness, the hour of the day, his or her attitude toward the problem and the circumstances [19]. Women in labor have a need for companionship, empathy and help, and descriptive studies of women’s childbirth experiences have suggested four dimensions to the support that they want during labor: emotional support, informational support, physical support and advocacy [20]. Both the emotional and informational support depend on the communication skills of physicians and midwives.

The results of the present study are similar to results of other studies done in different countries which also show the importance of women’s satisfaction with communication as an important factor in the general satisfaction of women’s birth care[20,21,22]. In a descriptive study from Iran, 50 midwives were evaluated by parturient women. The majority of them evaluated midwives’ communicative behaviors at an acceptable level [1].

In an institution-based cross-sectional descriptive study from Ethiopia, a total of 423 postpartum women were interviewed to assess their satisfaction in a maternal health care setting. The results show that the proportion of mothers who were completely satisfied with the health care they received ranged between 2.4 to 21%. The provider's communication with their clients yielded complete client satisfaction rates ranging between 0.7 to 26% [16].

Not being satisfied with provider communication was a reason for being dissatisfied with overall care among 400 women who delivered in a hospital in Egypt [23].  

Results of a cross-sectional survey on 1004 women in India indicated that improving interpersonal interaction with nurse-midwives, and ensuring privacy during childbirth and the hospital stay are recommended first steps to improve women’s childbirth satisfaction [15].

In a qualitative study from Nigeria, the quality of communication of health care providers in a delivery room was recognized as an important factor in improving women’s experience of childbirth [24].

There is strong empirical evidence that physician nonverbal behavior has an impact on patients. Research has demonstrated that the nonverbal expression of affiliativeness (desire to emotionally bond),  through  behaviors  such  as  looking  at  the  patient,  nodding,  or  leaning forward,  has  a  positive impact on patient satisfaction [25]. Conversely, nonverbal  dominance,  in  the  form  of  long  physician  speaking  time  or  a dominant  tone  of  voice,  for  instance,  has  a  negative  impact  on  satisfaction [26].  Also,  it  has  been  shown  that  a  physician’s  nonverbal  behavior  that  expresses  concern,  for  instance,  through   frequent   eye   contact,   a concerned   facial   expression, or close interpersonal distance, leads to more patient trust than a physician’s behavior that conveys  more  distance.  Regarding  patient  adherence, it has been shown that physician touching of the  patient  increases  patient  adherence  with  their  medication [26].

In a qualitative study on 16 mothers in Iran, results show that outcomes of a positive midwife-mother
relationship in the delivery room can lead to facilitation of childbirth, a positive birth experience, mental health promotion and improvement in the mother’s quality of life.  An effective midwife-mother relationship can lead to positive childbirth outcomes and promotion of maternal and neonatal health [21].

Although the role of communication in women’s satisfaction has been recognized and positive communication among health care providers has been recommended by WHO, some studies have not supported this association.  In a mixed-methods systematic review, a lack of evidence on the impact of interventions to support effective communication between maternity care staff and healthy women during labor and birth were identified. Very low quality evidence was found on effectiveness of communication training of maternity care staff [27]. A study from Syria reported that a communication skills training intervention for resident doctors were not associated with higher satisfaction reported by women. In the context of a highly crowded and stressful environment where middle-class and low-class Syrian women deliver, a specially-designed training package in interpersonal and communication skills for residents did not achieve an overall improvement in women’s satisfaction with the doctor– woman relationship in labor and delivery rooms. However, certain items in the doctors’ behavior have improved. It would be worth investigating whether the package would improve women’s satisfaction in less stressful settings, but also it is worth looking at other possible interventions in maternity care practice such as doctor–midwife collaboration or attendance of birth companions in such settings. Despite the lack of evidence from these studies, the need to improve interpersonal skills of medical doctors and obstetricians specifically should be reinforced, as good communication is central to quality healthcare [28].

The results of the present study regarding the association of satisfaction with sociodemographic characteristics of the women are in agreement with the results of many other studies. For instance, the results of a study done on 790 Australian women shows that parity, level of school-based education and place of residence were associated with differences in women’s overall ratings of care; however, age was not associated with ratings of care [13]. In a 2016 study, labor observations and 2672 surveys in Ghana, Guinea, Myanmar, and Nigeria, age was predominantly the single factor associated with different types of mistreatment. Younger women (15–19 years) were more likely to experience any physical abuse, verbal abuse, or stigma or discrimination, after adjusting for country, education, marital status, and parity. Younger women with no education and younger women with some education were more likely to experience verbal abuse, compared with older women (≥30 years)[14]. In a cross-sectional study by Okafor et al. in Enugu State in Nigeria, 20% of women reported discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, low social class, young age and HIV seropositive status, however, in four cross-sectional studies, women of low socioeconomic status and with no formal education reported experiences of unfriendly and harsh attitudes of staff in higher proportions [ 12]. Verbal and nonverbal communication of health care providers in the delivery room have a significant impact on women’s satisfaction with care, but we have to consider others factors, too. WHO recommends effective communication between maternity care providers and women in labor, however no research has addressed the research gap regarding level, type and other characteristics of communication of health care providers [7].  Further studies are needed to more precisely identify the role of communication in women’s satisfaction during labor and delivery by considering all aspects of care.

Strengths and limitations

This study included a large sample size. Additionally, studying verbal and non-verbal communication was a strength of the present study, whereas the convenient sampling approach and limiting our sample to include only the experiences of births in public hospitals were limitations.

Conclusions

The overall satisfaction of women with the communication of their health care providers in the delivery room was 58.4%. A relatively small proportion (14.6%, 27.3%) of women were completely satisfied with verbal and non-verbal communication of health care providers in the delivery room, respectively. The majority of women who were generally satisfied with their birth care were also satisfied with the communication of physicians and midwives during birth. The results of the present study have clarified one necessary aspect for quality improvement in antepartum care in maternity hospitals of the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Health policy makers and stakeholders can play an important role in developing strategies for improving communication skills of health care providers.

List of Abbreviations

WHO

World Health Organization

NICU

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Declarations

References

  1. Amdady N, Koo J, Rosenthal R, Winograd C. Physical therapists’ nonverbal communication predicts geriatric patients’ health outcomes. Psychology and Aging 2002; 17(3):443-52 DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.443
  2. Ojelade OA, Titiloye MA, Bohren MA, Olutayo AO, Olalere AA, Akintan A, etal. The communication and emotional support needs to improve women’s experience of childbirth care in health facilities in Southwest Nigeria: A qualitative study. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2017; 139 (Suppl. 1): 27–37, DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12380.
  3. Sayed W, AbdElAal DE, Mohammed HS, Abbas AM, Zahran KM. Maternal satisfaction with delivery services at tertiary university hospital in upper Egypt, is it actually satisfying? Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;7(7):2547-2552, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182859
  4. Nilsson L, Thorsell T, Wahn E, Ekström A. Factors Influencing Positive Birth Experiences of First-Time Mothers. Nurs Res Pract. 2013; 2013: 349124; doi: 10.1155/2013/349124
  5. Attarha M, Keshavarz Z, Bakhtiari M, Jamilian M. The Outcome of Midwife-Mother Relationship in Delivery Room: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Health, 2016; 8: 336-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2016.84035)
  6. The Royal College of Midwives. Evidence based guidelines for Midwifery-Led care in labor. 2012. Accessed 20 Nov 2019. https://www.academia.edu/35976988/Evidence_Based_Guidelines_for_Midwifery-Led_Care_in_Labour_Positions_for_Labour_and_Birth
  7. Brown SW, Nelson AM, Bronkesh SJ, Wood SD. Quality service for practice success. Maryland: Aspen Publication; 1993. Patient Satisfaction Pays.
  8. Grobman WA, Holl J, Woods D, Gleason KM, Wassilak B and Szekendi MK. Perspectives on communi cation in labor and delive ry: A focus group analysis. Journal of Perinatology 2011: 31, 240–245
  9. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendation on effective communication between maternity care providers and women in labour. The WHO Reproductive Health Library. 2018. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/care-during-childbirth/who-recommendation-effective-communication-between-maternity-care-providers-and-women-labour.Acceced May 2019.
  10. Melese T, Gebrehiwot Y, Bisetegne D, Habte D. Assessment of client satisfaction in labor and delivery services at a maternity referral hospital in Ethiopia. Pan African Medical Journal. 2014; 17:76 doi:10.11604/pamj.2014.17.76.3189.
  11. Jhaa P, Larsson M, Christensson K, Svanberg AS. Satisfaction with childbirth services provided in public health facilities: results from a cross- sectional survey among postnatal women in Chhattisgarh, India. GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2017 VOL. 10, 1386932
  12. Bohren M, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, Maung T, Balde M, Maya E. How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labor observations and community-based surveys. Lancet 2019; 394: 1750–63.
  13. Brown S, Lumley J. Satisfaction with care in labor and birth: A survey of 790 Australian Women. Birth;1994:21(1)
  14. Ishola F, Owolabi O, Filippi V. Disrespect and abuse of women during childbirth in Nigeria: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3) e0174084.
  15. Prakash B. Patient Satisfaction. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010; 3(3): 151–155.
  16. Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, Ndwiga C, Maingi G, Serwanga J, et al. Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2013; 13:21. doi: 10.1186/1471- 2393-13-21.
  17. Freedman LP, Kruk ME. Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. The Lancet. 2014. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X
  18. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women. White Ribbon Alliance 2011. https://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Final_RMC_Charter.pdf Accessed 14 Apr 2019.
  19. WHO recommendations Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. https://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/RMC-Guide_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2019.
  20. Windau-Melmer T. A Guide for Advocating for Respectful Maternity Care. Washington, DC: Futures Group, Health Policy Project: 2013.
  21. Delgado V, Gholitabar M, Sims JM, Bewley S. Intrapartum care of healthy women and their babies: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 2014;349:g6886 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6886.
  22. Vafaei Z, Javadnoori M, Najar N, Latifi SM. Barriers of effective communication between midwives and parturient women in hospitals of Khuzestan Province, Iran, 2012. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2013; 15(40):10-5.
  23. Baker DP, Salas E, King H, Battles J, Barach P. The role of teamwork in professional education of physicians: current status and assessment recommendation. The Joint Commission Journal of Quality and Patient Safety. 2005; 31(4):185-202.
  24. Taghizadeh ZI, Razaiepour A, Mehran AB, Alimardani Z. Usage of communication skills by midwives and its relation to client satisfaction. Journal of Hayat. 2007; 12(4):47-55.
  25. Katebi MS, khadivzadeh T, Shamloo ZS, Esmaily H. Evaluating Midwives Communication Skills from the Perspective of Parturient Women Attending to Hospitals for Delivery. J Midwifery Reprod Health. 2017; 5(2): 882-889.
  26. Mast MS, Cousin G. The role of nonverbal communication in medical interactions: Empirical results, theoretical bases, and methodological issues. In:  Martin LR, DiMatteo R. The Oxford Handbook of Health Communication, Behavior Change, and Treatment Adherence, 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282849046_The_role_of_nonverbal_communication_in_medical_interactions_Empirical_results_theoretical_bases_and_methodological_issues. Accessed Jun 26 2019.
  27. Chang Y, Coxon K, Portela AG, Furuta M, Bick D. Midwifery Interventions to support effective communication between maternity care staff and women in labor: A mixed-methods systematic review. 201 8 Apr; 59: 4–1 6., doi: 1 0.1 01 6/j.midw.201 7.1 2.01 4: 1 0.1 01 6/j.midw.201 7.1 2.01 4.
  28. Bashour H, Kanaan M, Kharouf MH, Abdulsalam AA, Tabbaa MA, Cheikha S, et al. The effect of training doctors in communication skills on women’s satisfaction with doctor–woman relationship during labor and delivery: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial in Damascus, BMJ Open 2013;3:e002674. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002674.