Thirty-one patients with diabetes and 14 individuals without diabetes were enrolled. Seven were excluded because of numerous motion artifacts on their MRI. Finally, 25 patients with diabetes (11 women, 49-88 years old) and 12 individuals without diabetes (8 women, 21-81 years old) were included in the analysis. The demographic data of the excluded subjects were not different from the study subjects. Patients with diabetes were further divided into two groups based on the MRI-based CSVD score: diabetes without CSVD (n = 12, 7 female, 49-78 years old) and diabetes with CSVD (n = 13, 4 female, 63-88 years old) (Table 1). The distribution of sex and the prevalence of hypertension did not differ among the three groups (P = 0.25 and 0.18, respectively, Fisher’s exact test). Subjects of diabetes with CSVD were older (P = 0.004, one-way ANOVA with the multiple comparisons test), had a higher proportion of dementia (P = 0.034, Fisher’s exact test), and a more advanced stage of CKD (P = 0.036, Kruskal–Wallis test). Among patients with diabetes, the HbA1c level was equal (P = 0.22, Student’s t-test) between the CSVD and non-CSVD groups. The scores of individual CSVD items and the total CSVD score did not differ between the control and diabetes without CSVD groups (total score, P = 0.301; lacune, P = 0.9; PVS, P = 0.39; WMH, P = 0.62; microbleeds, P = 0.195; Mann–Whitney U test).
Table 1
Demographic data of patients with and without diabetes
|
Total (N=37)
|
diabetes (N=25)
|
Non-diabetes (N=12)
|
p-value
|
|
CSVD (N=13)
|
No CSVD (N=12)
|
Gender (Female,%)
|
19(51.4)
|
4 (30.7)
|
7 (58.3)
|
8 (66.7)
|
0.257
|
Age (mean ± SD)
|
64.83 ± 15.26
|
74.61 ± 8.75
|
63.25 ± 10.4
|
55.83 ± 19.32
|
0.004**
|
Hypertension (N,%)
|
20(54.1)
|
8 (61.5)
|
8 (66.7)
|
5(33.3)
|
0.313
|
Dementia (N,%)
|
16 (43.2)
|
10 (76.9)
|
6 (50)
|
3 (25)
|
0.034*
|
CKD stage (median, [IQR])
|
1[1, 2]
|
2 [1.5,3]
|
1[1, 2]
|
1[1, 1]
|
0.036*
|
DM, diabetes mellitus; CSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; SD, standard deviation; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 |
Temporal dynamics: diabetes showed an impact on the increase in Ktrans in addition to the effect of aging, particularly in diabetes with CSVD group
In all subjects, the total Ktrans, Ktrans of WM, and Ktrans of GM all increased with age (Fig. 2D-G), approximately following the equation of total Ktrans = (0.2517 * age − 4.254)/1000 (R2 = 0.3638, P = 0.0379) in control group and total Ktrans = [0.1768 * age + 12.73]/1000 in diabetes group. Before the adjustment for age, the diabetes group had increased total Ktrans, Ktrans of WM, and Ktrans of GM (P = 0.0258, 0.0199, and 0.0319, respectively, Student’s t-test, Fig. 2A-C). In order to adjust the effect of aging, a permutation-based linear model with 10,000 random shufflings of patients and healthy controls was performed to test the correlation. A significant effect of diabetes on the Ktrans of WM (p = 0.048, Fig. 2F) but not on total Ktrans and Ktrans of GM was found (p = 0.128, p = 0.132, respectively, Fig. 2E-G) between diabetes and control group.
Table 2
Statistical power of various combinations of CSVD items in determining Ktrans among patients with diabetes
Criteria
|
Sensitive region
|
p-value
|
MB ≥ 1
|
CH,
|
0.044*
|
|
putamen
|
0.047*
|
|
parietal WM
|
0.04*
|
MB ≥ 1 and WMH ≥ 1
|
CH
|
0.044*
|
|
parietal WM
|
0.04*
|
MB ≥ 1 and PVS ≥ 2
|
CH
|
0.044*
|
|
putamen
|
0.047*
|
|
parietal WM
|
0.04*
|
MB ≥ 1 and PVS ≥ 3
|
CH
|
0.044*
|
|
putamen
|
0.047*
|
|
parietal WM
|
0.04*
|
MB ≥ 1 and WMH ≥ 1 and PVS ≥ 2
|
CH
|
0.044*
|
MB ≥ 1, WMH ≥ 1 and PVS ≥ 3
|
CH
|
0.044*
|
WMH ≥ 2
|
putamen
|
0.065
|
|
parietal WM
|
0.055
|
WMH ≥ 2 and PVS ≥ 2
|
parietal WM
|
0.055
|
SD, standard deviation; CSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; PVS, perivascular space; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; MB, microbleed; WM, white matter; GM, grey matter; CH, caudate head. |
Based on the assumption that CSVD features on MRI represented a more advanced stage of diabetes than no CSVD features on MRI,20 diabetes patients were further divided into diabetes with CSVD and diabetes without CSVD. The effect of diabetes on Ktrans of GM after age adjustment was shown in diabetes with CSVD group (p = 0.035, permutation test for 10000 random resamples, Fig. 2H) but not in diabetes without CSVD group (p = 0.503, permutation test for 10000 random resamples, Fig. 2I).
Spatial dynamics: Ktrans of WM was increased in all diabetic patients, whereas Ktrans of GM was increased in diabetic patients with CSVD
To examine the spatial dynamics of Ktrans in diabetes, the Ktrans values of WM and GM were analyzed separately. The Ktrans of the WM was increased in all patients with diabetes, irrespective of the absence or presence of CSVD (p = 0.04, 0.02, respectively, Student’s t-test, Fig. 3E). The Ktrans of the GM was only increased in diabetes with CSVD group that had an advanced diabetes status (P = 0.006, Student’s t-test, Fig. 3F). In addition, among all diabetic patients, the Ktrans of the GM was higher in diabetes with CSVD group than in diabetes without CSVD group (P = 0.023, Student’s t-test, Fig. 3F).
Regarding the WM, parietal region showed an increase in Ktrans in all patients with diabetes (diabetes without CSVD vs. control, P = 0.04; diabetes with CSVD vs. control, P = 0.016; Student’s t-test, Fig. 3G), whereas frontal WM, only showed a marginal statistical significance (P = 0.06, Student’s t-test, Fig. 3G). Regarding the GM, the Ktranss of the putamen and CH were higher in diabetes with CSVD group (diabetes with CSVD vs. control, P = 0.027; diabetes with CSVD vs. diabetes without CSVD, P = 0.021, Student’s t-test, Fig. 3H). In summary, in diabetic patients, the increased Ktrans of the WM was the most prominent in the parietal WM, and the increased Ktrans of the GM was mainly found in the CH and putamen.
K trans was not correlated with the HbA1c level.
The HbA1c level, an averaged status of recent glycaemic control, in patients who underwent DCE-MRI was not correlated with the Ktrans of the WM or GM (r2 = 0.0157 and 0.0176, respectively, Pearson’s correlation). Even analyzing diabetes without CSVD and diabetes with CSVD groups separately, the correlation between the HbA1c level and Ktrans was not observed. We further divided patients with diabetes according to their recent glycaemic control into two groups, HbA1c < 8 and HbA1c ≥ 8. The Ktrans of the WM or GM did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = 0.235 and 0.173, respectively, Student’s t-test).
High CSVD score correlated with the increased Ktrans in all patients with CSVD.
We further clarify whether the increase in Ktrans generally presents in all CSVDs or is a specific feature for diabetes-related CSVD. Nondiabetic patients with CSVD were enrolled (n = 13 [7 men and six women], aged 74.9 ± 11 years). Their sex, age, the prevalence of hypertension or dementia, the stage of CKD, the total CSVD score, the scores of individual CSVD items, and the Ktrans values of the five ROIs did not differ from the diabetic patients with CSVD (Table 3). Both in diabetes CSVD and nondiabetes CSVD groups, their Ktrans of WM, GM, and total Ktrans were higher than the control group (Fig. 3I), suggesting the increase in Ktrans presents in all CSVDs.
Table 3
Comparisons of demographic data between patients with CSVD with and without diabetes
|
Diabetes with CSVD
|
Non-diabetes CSVD
|
p-value
|
|
(N=13)
|
(N=12)
|
|
Gender (Female) (N,%)
|
4, 30.7
|
9, 75
|
0.165
|
Age (mean ± SD)
|
68.78±10.45
|
74.9±11.06
|
0.94
|
Hypertension (N,%)
|
8, 61.5
|
7, 58.3
|
0.11
|
Dementia (N,%)
|
10, 76.9
|
9, 75
|
0.57
|
CKD stage (median, [IQR])
|
2[1.5,3]
|
2[1, 2]
|
0.31
|
Total CSVD score
|
3 [2.5,3]
|
3 [2, 5]
|
0.301
|
PVS score
|
0[0,1]
|
1 [0,1]
|
0.393
|
Lacune score
|
1 [0,1]
|
1 [0,1]
|
0.99
|
WMH score
|
1 [1, 1]
|
1 [1, 1]
|
0.627
|
MB score
|
1[0.5,1]
|
1 [1, 2]
|
0.195
|
Total Ktrans
|
0.035 ± 0.028
|
0.027 ± 0.02
|
0.449
|
WM Ktrans
|
0.023 ± 0.025
|
0.027 ± 0.03
|
0.756
|
Frontal WM Ktrans
|
0.013 ± 0.017
|
0.0194 ± 0.0197
|
0.431
|
Parietal WM Ktrans
|
0.033 ± 0.036
|
0.0247 ± 0.0221
|
0.474
|
GM Ktrans
|
0.046 ± 0.036
|
0.032 ± 0.022
|
0.256
|
CH Ktrans
|
0.032 ± 0.029
|
0.023 ± 0.02
|
0.365
|
Putamen Ktrans
|
0.069 ± 0.072
|
0.045 ± 0.032
|
0.219
|
Thalamus Ktrans
|
0.03 ± 0.029
|
0.027 ± 0.02
|
0.803
|
CKD, chronic kidney disease; SD, standard deviation; CSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; PVS, perivascular space; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; MB, microbleed; WM, white matter; GM, grey matter; CH, caudate head. |
The increased Ktrans in diabetes and nondiabetes CSVD correlated with distinct CSVD items
Because the DCE-MRI protocol is time-consuming, it may not be routinely used in conventional medical practice. In addition, DCE-MRI is highly dependent on patients’ cooperation and is challenging to perform in patients with moderate to severe dementia. To improve the accessibility and applicability of the estimation of BBB permeability, we utilized the individual items of MRI CSVD scores, which are more generally available, to indicate the increase in Ktrans.
Initially, in recruiting subjects, CSVD was defined as MRI CSVD score >1. Any of the 4 CSVD items can contribute a positive score. However, the correlation between an individual item and Ktrans was low and varied (Kendall's tau between total Ktrans and lacune numbers, total Ktrans and PVS numbers, 0.218 and -0.22, respectively). Thus, we tried to find better combinations of each MRI CSVD item with different thresholds to indicate Ktrans.
For patients with diabetes, all of them were reclassified according to the various cutoff points of each CSVD item. For instance, patients with diabetes were reclassified into two groups, according to WMH < 1 and WMH ≥ 1. Subsequently, the Ktrans values of the newly generated two groups were compared. For the four CSVD items, WMH values were assigned four grades (WMH = 0, 1, 2, or 3). The PVS ranged from 0 to >20, microbleeds ranged from 0 to >15, and lacunes ranged from 0 to 5. The combinations of the aforementioned items with various cutoff values generated 4500 classification criteria, including the criterion of a single item and the criteria of ≥2 combined items. Among 4500 criteria, any one generated two groups with extremely uneven sample sizes (n < 8 in one group) was discarded. Finally, 76 classification criteria remained. After dividing patients with diabetes using any of the 76 criteria, and comparing the Ktrans of the five ROIs between two groups, finally only six criteria generated two groups of statistically different Ktrans.
Among the four MRI features of CSVD, the presence of microbleeds was the most sensitive indicator for a significantly increased Ktrans in multiple brain regions, including the CH, putamen, and parietal WM (Table 2). The addition of other CSVD items to the microbleeds, including PVS ≥ 2 and WMH ≥ 2, did not change the statistical result. In patients with no microbleeds on MRI, WMH ≥ 2 alone showed marginal significance in suggesting an increased Ktrans in the putamen and parietal WM (P = 0.065 and P = 0.055, respectively). The presence of the PVS or lacune alone did not indicate an increased Ktrans in diabetic patients.
K trans correlated with distinct CSVD features in non-diabetic patients.
To test the hypothesis that diabetes-related CSVD may have distinct pathophysiology from nondiabetes CSVD, the aforementioned methods were also applied to non-diabetic patients. Similar to diabetic patients, the presence of microbleeds suggested an increase in Ktrans in non-diabetic patients with CSVD (Table 4). In contrast to diabetic patients, the presence of lacune alone or multiple PVSs (≥6) alone indicated an increase in Ktrans in non-diabetic patients with CSVD. Although Moderate WMH (≥2) showed marginal significance in indicating Ktrans in the diabetes group, it was not an indicator in the nondiabetes group.
Table 4
Statistical power of various combinations of CSVD items in determining the Ktrans in nondiabetes group
Criteria
|
Sensitive region
|
p-value
|
MB ≥ 1
|
CH
|
0.016*
|
|
frontal WM
|
0.013*
|
MB ≥ 2
|
CH
|
0.0086**
|
|
frontal WM
|
0.01*
|
MB ≥ 1 and PVS ≥ 4
|
CH
|
0.003**
|
|
frontal WM
|
0.02*
|
MB ≥ 2 and PVS ≥ 4
|
CH
|
0.0017**
|
MB ≥ 2 and PVS ≥ 7
|
frontal WM
|
0.027*
|
MB ≥ 2 and WMH ≥ 2
|
CH
|
0.05
|
|
frontal WM
|
0.075
|
Lacune ≥ 1
|
CH
|
0.032*
|
PVS ≥ 6
|
CH
|
0.077
|
|
frontal WM
|
0.029*
|
PVS ≥ 6 and WMH ≥ 1
|
CH
|
0.047*
|
|
frontal WM
|
0.024*
|
PVS ≥ 7
|
frontal WM
|
0.035*
|
PVS ≥ 8
|
frontal WM
|
0.028*
|
CKD, chronic kidney disease; SD, standard deviation; CSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; PVS, perivascular space; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; MB, microbleed; WM, white matter; GM, grey matter; CH, caudate head; F, frontal white matter |