Vertical profiles of edaphic properties in different soil types
The vertical variations in morphological characters and edaphic properties with depth were observed across the profiles of paddy soils (Figure 1B, S1). It was noted that pH elevated and approached 7 with the increase in soil depths in all samples (P < 0.001). When compared with topsoil, the deeper layers were depleted in partial elements, including OM, N (total N, available N and NH4+-N), P (total and available P), Fe (total and available Fe), Mn (total and available Mn) and available Cu/Zn/Mo (P < 0.01), while K, Ca and total Mg/Cu/Zn were insensitive to soil depths.
With regard to the two paddy soil types, pH, Fe and N were the most differentiated edaphic properties (Figure 1C, S2). In Fe-accumuli stagnic anthrosols, the upper layers (w1~w2) appeared to be more acidic with lower pH (4.90~6.61) when compared with those in Hapli-type (pH 5.47-7.27). Fe-accumuli type that possessed typical Fe-Mn cutans in the hydragric horizon (Fe-accumulate diagnostic horizon), was characteristic of more than 1.5 times higher levels of free Fe oxides in the deep layers than that in epipedon (Figure S2). The total Fe and Fe oxides in Fe-accumuli type were also significantly lower than that in surface layers of Hapli-type (P < 0.0001), while possessing higher available Fe content (Figure S2). The lower concentrations of total N and NH4+-N were also exhibited in the deep layers (w3 and w2-w4, respectively) of Fe-accumuli soils than those of Hapli-stagnic soils (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Besides, Fe-accumuli soils tended to be rich in total K (w2-w4), total Zn (w3), available Zn (w2) and total Mo (w4), whereas Hapli-stagnic soils possessed higher nutrient levels with available Ca/Mg and total Mg/Cu/Zn in the superficial layers (w1) and available Mo in the deepest layers (w4) (P < 0.05). The differentiations were also revealed by Random Forest (RF) classification analysis, which showed that soil type could be best distinguished by free Fe oxides for the topsoil, while NH4+-N and Mo (total and available Mo) was of the most importance in the deep layers (Figure S3).
Microbial community assembly shifted between soil types
The assembly patterns of total bacterial and diazotrophic communities between the two soil types were analyzed. Along soil profiles, bacterial and diazotrophic α-diversity indices, including observed operational taxonomic unit (Sobs; richness) and Shannon (taxonomic diversity) displayed a decrease trend as soil depth increased, which tendency was also observed in the gene abundances of the total bacteria and nifH genes quantified by qPCR (Figure S4). However, there was no significant difference observed between the microbial diversities and abundances of the two soil types, except for significant higher values for bacterial and diazotrophic abundances in w2 layer of Fe-accumuli type.
The turnovers of microbial community compositions were visualized with PLS-DA analyses. Samples formed distinct clusters according to soil depths and types (Figure 2A-B), with statistically significant differences being noted at taxonomic levels (P ≤ 0.001, ANOSIM/ADONIS) (Table S2). To determine whether deterministic or stochastic processes best explain the assembly of the bacterial and diazotrophic communities, mean nearest taxon index (NTI; indicates the ‘terminal’ phylogenetic dispersion of the community) and βNTI were calculated. When considering soil depth, mean NTI scores were all positive, with significantly higher values in the topsoil (Table S3). βNTI values tended to approach the range of -2 to +2 with the increase in soil depths (Table S4). The data suggested that these microbial communities from the epipedon were more phylogenetically clustered than that of the deeper layers. By contrast, the variance of mean NTI values between the two soil types was slight (Table S3). The majority of βNTI values were above +2 (59.76~64.58%) for bacterial assembly, while the scores for diazotrophic community were mainly in the range of -2 to +2 (54.20~58.25%), with Hapli-stagnic soil always exhibiting higher proportions (Figure S5). These data revealed that the deterministic processes dominated the phylogenetic community dynamics of bacterial assembly, while stochastic processes for diazotrophic community turnover in these paddy soil samples.
Environmental factors shape microbial assembly
As revealed by partial Mantel test between soil types in the whole layers, diazotrophic community was more sensitive to geographic distances (R = 0.28~0.32) with higher regression slopes (R = 0.13~0.19) than environmental heterogeneity did, while spatial and environmental distances contributed similarly to bacterial community dissimilarities (Table S5). The data were further confirmed by distance-decay pattern (Figure S6). For Fe-accumuli soils, both environmental and geographic variables exerted more impacts on diazotrophic community dissimilarities (R = 0.19 and 0.32, respectively) than those in Hapli-stagnic group (R = 0.13 and 0.28, respectively). The similar trend was also noted for bacterial community.
When considering edaphic factors only, α-diversities and abundances of bacteria and diazotrophs were positively correlated with OM, total N and available nutrients (N, Fe, Cu, Zn and Mo), while negatively linked with pH (Figure S7). Mantel test further showed that the turnover in bacterial and diazotrophic community compositions exhibited significant and strong correlations with most edaphic properties (e.g. soil pH and available Mg/Ca/N/Fe), except for soil texture (clay, sand, silt) and total Mg/Mo (Table S6).
When considering the two soil types separately, Fe-type soil possessed more significant correlations between microbial community assembly and edaphic factors as compared with Hapli-type soil did (Figure S8). Among the three most differentiated indices (NH4+-N, available Fe and free Fe oxides) between the two soil types, their significant correlation with bacterial and diazotrophic community structures was observed in Fe-accumuli type, while the correlation was weak in Hapli-type soil, except for the effect of available Fe on diazotrophic community.
Impacts of soil depth and type on edaphic properties and microbial community assembly
To evaluate the effects of soil depth and type on edaphic properties, two-way ANOVAs analysis was applied (Figure 2E). pH, available N/Fe, NH4+-N and total P/Mn were significantly influenced by both soil depth and type (P < 0.05). OM, total N/Fe and available S/P/Mn/Zn/Cu were solely significantly influenced by soil depth (P < 0.05), while soil types exerted impacts specifically on K contents and partial micronutrients (total Zn/Mo and available Ca/Mg) (P < 0.05).
Microbial populations were also significantly sensitive to both soil depth and type. Combined with PERMANOVA, soil depth was the major determinant for rendering bacterial and diazotrophic community structure separation, which explains 13.04% and 9.42% of the observed structure variation (P = 0.001), respectively, followed by soil types (7.58% and 6.72%, P = 0.001) (Figure 2F).
Identification of discriminant microbial taxa characterizing soil types
Across the whole layers, the distribution of microbial compositions showed that Micrococcaceae, Anaerolineaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, Xanthomonadaceae and f_norank_c_Nitrospira were dominant bacterial family, with a ratio of 21.72%~28.84% in Fe-accumuli- and Hapli-type soils, respectively (Figure 2A, Table S7). For diazotrophic composition, Bradyrhizobium was the major genus (21.11 and 26.27%), followed by Geobacter (7.63 and 4.75%), Azoarcus (7.18 and 3.96%), Leptothrix (4.90 and 6.42%) and Heliobacterium (2.06 and 4.16%) for Fe- and Hapli-type soils, respectively (Figure 2B, Table S7).
Among the top 10 differentiated bacterial families in each layer (P < 0.05), Acidobacteriaceae_Subgroup1 and Xanthomonadaceae (Rhodanobacter) were characteristic of the topsoil (w1) and deep layers (w2-w4), respectively, in Fe-accumuli-anthrosol (Figure S9). Anaerolineaceae was enriched in the subsurface layers (w2-w4) of Hapli-type soils. Moreover, only the minority (20%-30%) of the discriminant diazotrophic genera (P < 0.05) appeared in Hapli-type samples, which was characteristic of anaerobic sulfur-reducing bacteria (SRB), including Desulfobacca (w1-w3), Desulfovibrio (w3) and Desulfomonile (w4) (Figure S10). The results were also confirmed by RF classification analysis, which showed that soil types could be correctly predicted 81.50~96.30% of the time based on microbial compositions, although the assessment accuracy was higher for bacterial predictors than that for diazotrophic genera (Figure S11-S12). As compared with the subsurface layers (83.30~96.30%), topsoil samples possessed lower proportion of correctly assignment (81.50%) probably due to the homogenization effect caused by anthropogenic activities. Among the diazotrophic biomarkers, Fe-type soils harboured a higher proportion of aerobic taxa in the deep layers (66.67~85.71%), while the ratio for Hapli-type soils was less than 37.50% (Figure S12).
Accounting for potential drivers of soil N and Fe cycling processes
To comprehensive evaluate soil biogeochemical functions, the differentiated N and Fe cycling indices were calculated by normalizing and standardizing each of the N/Fe-related nutrient properties (Figure 3A) [36]. The main variables for predicting the variation in soil N and Fe cycles of the two soil types were identified by RF analysis. Throughout the whole profiles, the models were highly predictive by edaphic properties according to the determination values (R2 = 0.94~0.99, P = 0.01), and the values were 69%~80% for microbial variables (Figure 3B-3C). In Fe-accumuli anthrosol, available Fe was the most important variable for explaining the variation in N cycling index, and Cu was the most important explanatory factor for Fe cycling index. It was notable that varied status of N contents (NO3-N, NH4+-N and available N) also contributed significantly to Fe cycling index in Fe-accumuli type (P < 0.05). By contrast, available S acted as the most important variable for predicting both N and Fe cycling indices in Hapli-type soil (Figure 3B). When considering microbial predictors alone, diazotrophic and bacterial abundances best predicted the dynamics of soil N and Fe cycling indices, followed by microbial β-diversity (Figure 3C).
When considering soil horizons, the contribution of dominant microbial genera to soil N and Fe cycling indices varied remarkably among each layer (Figure 4). Some bacterial predictors were important for both N and Fe cycling, such as for Rhodanobacter that was characteristic of Fe-accumuli type soil. The genus belonging to family HSB_OF53_F07, Thiobacillus and Oryzihumus were pivotal in predicting N cycling in topsoil (P < 0.01), Paenibacillus, unclassified_order_Myxococcales and norank_phylum_SBR1093 in the secondary layers, and norank_order_JG30_KF_AS9, norank_class_S085 and norank_phylum_SBR1093 in the deep layers (Figure 4A). For Fe cycling index, bacterial unclassified_family_Intrasporangiaceae and Gaiellanorank_order_JG30_KF_AS9 best explained the variations in epipedon, subsurface and bottom layers, respectively (Figure 4B).
With respect to diazotrophic genera, Dechloromonas and Paludibacter contributed significantly to soil N cycling index, while Derxia/Methylocystis and Nitrospirillum/Burkholderia were among the best predictable variables for secondary and deep layers, respectively (Figure 4C). Notably, some diazotrophs were also vital in predicting soil Fe cycling process, including Leptothrix, Derxia, Anaeromyxobacter and SRB (Desulfobacca, Desulfotomaculum and Desulfatibacillum, which were characteristic in Hapli-type soil) (Figure 4D). Geobacter that was enriched in Fe-accumuli type was important for predicting for N cycling index (P < 0.05) in the bottom horizons (Figure 4B-C), and the significant correlation between Geobacter abundance and available Fe concentration in Hapli-type soils was further noted by linear regression analysis (Figure S13).