Our study results showed the prevalence of lifetime headache and headache in the last 12 months was 97.9% 84.2%, respectively. Which is higher than a study conducted among University of Gondar students, 81.11 and 67.22% respectively (32), in dental students of a tertiary care teaching dental hospital in Northern India, 63.9% (30) and Pharmacy Students, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi which was 82.6% (33).
Among those experienced headaches in the last 12 months, only 28.8% (95% CI: 22.9, 34.6) fulfilled the criteria of primary headache. This finding is similar to previously done researches in Addis Ababa among the Local community (34). However, this value is much lower than to the current global prevalence of 47% (35), Ojini et al. (14) reported 46% at a teaching hospital, Tertiary Health Facility in Lagos, Nigeria 39.3% (36), and a much higher prevalence of 74.5% had been documented among Brazilian undergraduates (22). While our finding was higher than a study conducted by Takele et. Al. (37) reported 16.4% among textile workers. The possible difference could be due to the study design and small population sizes in this study and cultural and environmental differences with the present study
The prevalence of the subtypes of headache was also noted and 17.1% with 95% CI (12.5, 22.1), of them had TTH and 11.9% with 95% CI (7.5, 15.8) of them had a migraine. This finding is similar to a study conducted in Addis Ababa by Mihila et. Al. 17.7% and 20.6% for migraine and THA respectively (38). But lower compared with a study conducted in Egypt 24.5% of them had TTH and 17.3% migraine (39), In Euro-light Project (40, 41), the mean prevalence of migraine in Europe was 14.7%, while the overall prevalence of TTH was 62.6%. In Georgia, the prevalence was 37.3% for TTH and 15.6% for migraine (42). This could be attributed to different methodologies and cultural diversity.
Our study documented a prevalence rate of migraines was 11.9% which is similar to a study in Benin among University students 11.3% (43), 12.4% among Turkey students (44), and 12.2% among students in Oman (11). But a considerably high compared to ‘Ojini’ 6.4% (14) and previous community-based studies in Ethiopia, 3–10% (25, 34). However, the findings of this study were very low compared with a study among Kuwaitis medical students 27.9% (45) and the study of Florianopolis in Brazil, which was 22.1% (46). The difference in the prevalence can be attributed to the racial, environmental, nutritional, psychological, and social factors of a particular population contributing to the headache. The other explanation could be due to the rigorous and strenuous medical program could account for the higher prevalence of headaches among medical students.
The prevalence rate of TTH in our study was 17.1%. This finding is much lower than the 47.7% documented in Zimbabwe (47), 25.5% by Quesada-V´azquez et al. in Cuba (48), and Russell reported 86% (49). There has been wide variations and differences in the epidemiology of TTH across different cultures (35). These variations may result from differences in study design, study population, inclusion or exclusion of cases of infrequent episodic TTH, and overlap with probable migraine, cultural and environmental differences, or even genetic factors (50).
Although, sex has no significant association with primary headache in this research the prevalence of primary headache was a little bit higher in women compared with men as has been previously reported (19–21). This has been attributed to the effect of female sex hormones specifically estrogen, genetics, and differences in response to stress and pain perception or psychological burden on females.
The majority of respondents with primary headache in this study was with the age group of 23 and 28 years. This age group has a significant association with primary headaches. It is consistent with the findings in the literature that locate the maximum of the migraine prevalence is at a younger age (23). This may be explained by the fact that 90.8% of surveyed students are 16 to 29 years old.
The finding of this research the prevalence of primary headache was high among urban dwellers compared with rural and showed a significant association between respondents from urban and primary headaches. This is supported by a study conducted in Ethiopia in 2003 & 2008 (25, 37). This might be due to the magico-religious perception of diseases and opting for traditional healing in rural communities may hinder the reporting of headaches. It is also the rural people who have a greater tolerance for pain.
The most common trigger factor for headache in this study was the presence of nausea and vomiting and sunshine or flashlight but different kinds of the literature indicated stress and lack of sleep in nonmedical students were stress and loud noise (24–27, 30).
Limitation of the study
The limitations of this study included sample size, in terms of both the students who were participated and the facilities that were used, which thereby limited the general applicability of the results. All data is based on self-reporting hence the study might be affected by reporting bias. Also, the study is prone to recall bias since most of the questions require recalling past experiences.