Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents
A total of 487 mother-to -child pairs were included in the study, resulting in a response rate of 485 (99.6%). The majority of women, 184 (37.9%), were 20–24 years of age and the mean (± SD) age of mothers was 24.5 (± 5.5) years of age. In addition, of the total respondents, 459 (94.6 per cent) were married, 291 (60 per cent) had a family size ≥ 4, 284 (58.6 per cent) were housewives by occupation, and 167 (34.4 per cent) attended primary school. Moreover, about 229(47.2%) of infants were first-order / first-child for their family (Table 1).
Table 1
Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers of children aged less than one years in Mizan-Aman town, south west Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 485)
Demographic variable
|
Frequency(N = 485)
|
Percentage (%)
|
Family size
|
|
|
<=3
|
194
|
40.0
|
> 4
|
291
|
60.0
|
Age of mothers
|
|
|
15–19
|
51
|
10.5
|
20–24
|
184
|
37.9
|
25–29
|
162
|
33.4
|
> 30
|
88
|
18.1
|
Maternal marital status
|
|
|
Single
|
20
|
4.1
|
Married
|
459
|
94.6
|
Other
|
6
|
1.2
|
Maternal educational level
|
|
|
Informal education
|
142
|
29.3
|
Primary (1–8)
|
167
|
34.4
|
Secondary (9–12) and above
|
176
|
36.2
|
Maternal religion
|
|
|
Orthodox
|
192
|
39.6
|
Protestant
|
179
|
36.9
|
Muslim
|
114
|
23.5
|
Maternal occupation
|
|
|
government employee
|
58
|
12.0
|
house wife
|
284
|
58.6
|
Others
|
143
|
29.4
|
Birth order of the infant
|
|
|
First
|
229
|
47.2
|
>=2
|
256
|
52.7
|
No of children in the family
|
|
|
<=3
|
424
|
87.4
|
>=4
|
61
|
12.6
|
Obstetrics And Maternal Health Service Utilization
The majority, 249(51.3%) of mothers were multipara, 470(96.9%) of the women were attending ANC, 315(67%) of them utilized ANC four and more times, while 280(59.6%) of them had gotten breast feeding counseling at the ANC clinic. Besides, 434(89.5%) of the study participants delivered their child at a government health facility and their delivery was assisted by skilled birth attendant and 435(89.7%) delivered through normal spontaneous (Table 2).
Table 2
; Health service utilization among mothers of children less than one years of age in Mizan-Aman town, 2020 (N = 485)
Variables
|
Frequency(N = 485)
|
Percentage (%)
|
Attending Antenatal care(n = 485)
|
|
|
Yes
|
470
|
96.9
|
No
|
15
|
3.1
|
Frequency of Antenatal care (n = 470)
|
|
|
1 time
|
11
|
2.3
|
2–3 times
|
144
|
30.6
|
≥ 4
|
315
|
67.0
|
Get breast feeding Counseling at ANC Clinic(n = 470)
|
|
|
Yes
|
280
|
59.6
|
No
|
190
|
40.4
|
Place of Delivery(n = 485)
|
|
|
Gov’t Health Facility
|
434
|
89.5
|
Private Clinic
|
2
|
.4
|
At Home
|
48
|
9.9
|
TBAs Place
|
1
|
.2
|
Mode of Delivery(n = 485)
|
|
|
CS Delivery
|
49
|
10.1
|
Normal Spontaneous Delivery
|
435
|
89.7
|
Instrumental delivery
|
1
|
.2
|
Delivery Attendant(n = 485)
|
|
|
Health Professionals
|
435
|
89.7
|
Traditional Birth Attendants
|
50
|
10.3
|
The majority of mothers were multiparous, 249(51.3%), 470(96.9%) of women attended ANC, 315(67%) of them used ANC four and more times, while at the ANC clinic, 280(59.6%) of them had received breast feeding counseling. In addition, 434 (89.5%) of the study participants delivered their child at a government health facility and were assisted by skilled birth attendants and delivered 435 (89.7%) by usual spontaneous delivery.
Colostrum Avoidance Practice
Although all mothers have breastfed ever their current infant, 163(35.5%) newborns were put to the breast more than one hour and 75(15.5%) of women were discarded colostrum for their infants within the first five days after birth. The main reasons for colostrum avoidance were; breast feeding problem 50(10.3%), maternal medical illness 19(3.9%) and a reason for their child health 6(1.23%) (Table 3).
Table 3
Colostrum avoidance among mothers of children’s less than one years of age, Mizan-Aman town, 2020(N = 485)
Variables
|
Frequency(N = 485)
|
Percent
|
Breastfed ever their current infant
|
|
|
Yes
|
485
|
100
|
Initiation of breast-feeding
|
|
|
< 1 hour
|
296
|
64.5
|
> 1 hour
|
163
|
35.5
|
colostrum avoidance
|
|
|
Yes
|
75
|
15.5
|
No
|
410
|
84.5
|
Reason for colostrum avoidance
|
|
|
Breast feeding problem
|
50
|
10.3
|
Maternal medical illness
|
19
|
3.9
|
For baby’s health
|
6
|
1.23
|
Prelacteal Feeding Practice
Of the total respondents, within the first three days after birth, 106(21.9%) were given prelacteal feds other than breast feed for their babies. Water with "Tenadam"/rue 49(10.1%), followed by plain water 33(6.8%), glucose with water 10(2.1%) and formula milk 9(1.9%) were the most popular types of prelacteal food. The main reasons for pre-lacteal feeding were: 49(10.1%) cultural practice, 45(9.3%) intestinal / throat / mouth cleanse, 31(6.4 per cent) due to breast feeding problems, and 19(3.9%) mothers believed that newborn breast feeding would be thirsty. (Table 4).
Table 4
prelacteal feeding among mothers of children’s less than one years of age, Mizan-Aman town, 2020(N = 485)
Variables
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Prelacteal feeding
|
|
|
Yes
|
106
|
21.9
|
No
|
379
|
78.1
|
Type of prelacteal food
|
|
|
Water and Tenadam/rue
|
49
|
10.1
|
Plain water
|
33
|
6.8
|
sugar with water
|
10
|
2.1
|
Formula milk
|
9
|
1.9
|
Butter
|
5
|
1
|
Reasons for prelacteal feeding were
|
|
|
Cultural practice
|
49
|
10.1
|
To clean infants’ bowel/throat/mouth
|
45
|
9.3
|
Breast feeding problem
|
31
|
6.4
|
Mothers believed that breast feed for new born will be thirsty
|
19
|
3.9
|
For infant health
|
14
|
2.9
|
Maternal medical illness
|
11
|
2.3
|
To calm/soothe the baby
|
9
|
1.9
|
As for guidance on offering this form of pre-lacteal feeding; their own decision was a dominant factor, 51(10.5%), followed by grandparents; 28(5.8%), their friends; 15(3.1%), most recently health professionals; 8(1.6%) (Fig. 1).
Factor Associated With Prelacteal Feeding
According to the bivariate logistic regression analysis, the following study variables were significantly associated with pre-lacteal feeding (p < 0,05): mothers in age groups 20–24 years old and 35–39 years old, mothers in income > 1,500birr / month, infants in birth order 4–6, multipara mothers, mothers assisted by traditional birth attendants and mothers who understood the risk of prelacteal feeding
In addition, these variables with p < 0.2 from the bivariate analysis were evaluated using a multivariate analysis. As a result, multivariate logistic regression analysis; multipara mothers, infants’ birth in order 4–6, having ≥ 4 children and mothers who understood the risk of pre-lacteal feeding were determinants of pre-lacteal feeding. Multipara Mothers were 3.56(AOR: 95% CI: 1.036, 12.227) times more likely to give prelacteal feds when compared to the counterpart. The odds of prelacteal feeding among mothers who knew the risk of prelacteal feeding were almost seven times, (AOR = 6.91, 95% CI: 3.002, 15.904), higher than the counterpart. Furthermore, infant’s birth order between 4–6 were 12.28(AOR: 95% CI: 1.528, 98.639) times more likely to give prelacteal feeding when compared to infant’s birth order one. The odds of prelacteal feeding among mothers having ≥ 4 number of children were nearly five times, (AOR = 5.2, 95% CI: 1.033, 26.141), higher than, those mothers having ≤ 3 number of children (Table 5).
Table 5
Factors associated with prelacteal feeding practices among mothers of children aged less than 12month in Mizan-Aman town, 2020
Variable
|
Prelacteal feeding
|
Crude OR (CI: 95%)
|
Adjusted OR (CI: 95%)
|
Yes (%)
|
No (%)
|
Age
|
|
|
|
|
15–19
|
21(41.2)
|
30(58.8)
|
1
|
1
|
20–24
|
40(21.7)
|
144(78.3)
|
2.52(1.304,4.869) *
|
.626(.174,2.26)
|
25–29
|
26(16)
|
136(84)
|
3.66(1.82,7.357)
|
.983(.237,4.071)
|
30–34
|
13(25.5)
|
38(74.5)
|
2.046(.882,4.745)
|
.208(.032,1.351)
|
35–39
|
6(19.4)
|
25(80.6)
|
2.917(1.019,8.344) *
|
.856(.08,9.125)
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
< 500 B/month
|
77(24.3)
|
240(75.7)
|
1
|
1
|
500–1000 Br/month
|
18(22.5)
|
62(77.5)
|
1.105(.616,1.982)
|
.677(.223,2.061)
|
1001–1500 Br/month
|
5(26.3)
|
14(73.7)
|
.898(.313,2.575)
|
.25(.045,1.39)
|
> 1500 Br/month
|
6(8.7)
|
63(91.3)
|
3.369(1.403,8.088) *
|
1.224(.321,4.678)
|
Birth order of infant
|
|
|
|
|
Birth order 1
|
58(25.3)
|
171(74.7)
|
1
|
1
|
Birth order 2–3
|
41(20.8)
|
156(79.2)
|
1.291(.819,2.034)
|
2.568(.696,9.473)
|
Birth order 4–6
|
5(9.8)
|
46(90.2)
|
3.12(1.183,8.23) *
|
12.276(1.528,98.639) **
|
NO_ of children
|
|
|
|
|
≤ 3
|
98(23.1)
|
326(76.9)
|
1
|
1
|
≥ 4
|
8(13.1)
|
53(86.9)
|
1.992(.916,4.331)
|
5.197(1.033,26.141) **
|
Parity
|
|
|
|
|
Primipara
|
61(25.8)
|
175(74.2)
|
1
|
1
|
Multipara
|
45(18.1)
|
204(81.9)
|
1.58(1.023,2.441) *
|
3.558(1.036,12.227) **
|
Delivery attendant
|
|
|
|
|
Health professional
|
87(20)
|
348(80)
|
1
|
1
|
Traditional birth attendant
|
19(38)
|
31(62)
|
2.452(1.322,4.546) *
|
1.668(.436,6.379)
|
Mother knows demerits of PLF
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
17(5.7)
|
280(94.3)
|
14.807(8.398,26.108) *
|
6.909(3.002,15.904) **
|
No
|
89(47.3)
|
99(52.7)
|
1
|
1
|
Statistically significant at p < 0.05 in bivariate analysis and ** Statistically significant at p < 0.05 in multivariate analysis |
Factors Associated With Colostrum Avoidance
In the bivariate logistic regression, the following were; mothers found in age group of 20–24 years old and 25–29 years old, infant birth order between 2–3, having ≥ 4 number of children, being multipara mothers, spontaneous vaginal delivery, having exposure to infant formula advertisement and not having home to home health education statistically significant with colostrum avoidance.
Accordingly, in multivariate logistic regression analysis; having exposure to infant formula advertisement, not having home to home health education, being multipara mothers and delivered through spontaneous vaginal delivery were determinants of colostrum avoidance. The odds of colostrum avoidance among mothers who have exposure to infant formula advertisement were nearly seven times, (AOR = 7.476, 95% CI: 3.549, 15.752), higher than the counterpart. Likewise, the odds of colostrum avoidance among mothers who do not have home to home health education were nearly five times, (AOR = 5.474, 95% CI: 2.876, 10.419), higher than the counterpart. Moreover, multipara mothers were 10.045(AOR: 95% CI: 1.456, 19.289) times more likely to practice colostrum avoidance when compared to primipara mothers. The odds of colostrum avoidance among mothers who gave birth through spontaneous vaginal delivery were three times, (AOR: 95% CI: 1.245, 7.750), higher than, those mothers who gave birth through CS (Table 6).
Table 6
Factors associated with colostrum avoidance practices among mothers of children aged less than 12month in Mizan-Aman town, 2020
variables
|
Colostrum avoidance
|
Crude OR (CI: 95%)
|
Adjusted OR (CI: 95%)
|
Yes (%)
|
No (%)
|
Age of respondents
|
|
|
|
|
15–19
|
16(21.3%)
|
35(8.5%)
|
1
|
1
|
20–24
|
25(33.3%)
|
159(38.8%)
|
2.97(1.406,6.012) *
|
1.447(.584,3.581)
|
25–29
|
20(26.7%)
|
142(34.6%)
|
3.246(1.527,6.901) *
|
1.210(.436,3.363)
|
30–34
|
11(14.7%)
|
40(9.8%)
|
1.662(.681,4.055)
|
.163(.039,.671)
|
35–39
|
3(4%)
|
28(6.8%)
|
4.267(1.1.29,16.124) *
|
.229(.035,1.495)
|
Infant birth order
|
|
|
|
|
Infant birth order 1
|
43(57.3%)
|
186(45.4%)
|
1
|
1
|
Infant birth order 2–3
|
31(41.3%)
|
166(40.5%)
|
1.238(.746, 2.055)
|
.211(.032,1.385)
|
Infant birth order 4–6
|
1(1.3%)
|
50(12.2%)
|
11.559(1.553,16.016) *
|
4.375(.235,19.927)
|
NO_ of children
|
|
|
|
|
≤ 3
|
74(98.7%)
|
350(85.4%)
|
1
|
1
|
≥ 4
|
1(1.3%)
|
60(14.6%)
|
12.688(1.730,32.996) *
|
4.335(.052, 16.505)
|
Parity
|
|
|
|
|
Primipara
|
46(61.3%)
|
190(46.3%)
|
1
|
1
|
Multipara
|
29(38.7%)
|
220(53.7%)
|
1.837(1.11,3.039) *
|
10.045(1.456,19.289) **
|
Mode of delivery
|
|
|
|
|
CS
|
13(17.3%)
|
36(8.8%)
|
1
|
1
|
Spontaneous vaginal
|
62(82.7%)
|
373(91%)
|
2.17291.091,4.326) *
|
3.106(1.245,7.750) **
|
Home to home education
|
|
|
|
|
yes
|
52(69.3%)
|
77(18.8%)
|
1
|
1
|
no
|
23(30.7%)
|
338(81.2%)
|
9.778(5.642,16.944) *
|
5.47492.876,10.419) **
|
Exposure to infant formula advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
yes
|
14(18.7%)
|
283(69%)
|
9.709(5.237,18.002) *
|
7.476(3.549,15.752) **
|
no
|
61(81.3%)
|
122(31%)
|
1
|
1
|
Statistically significant at p < 0.05 in bivariate analysis and ** Statistically significant at p < 0.05 in multivariate analysis |