According to the related ISO standards, by using the materials and methods detailed in Section 2, the results obtained are summarized in the relevant tables and paragraphs hereunder.
3.1 In-vitro experiments
3.1.1 Elastic moduli test
Specimen No.
|
Young’s modulus (GPa)
|
01
|
296
|
02
|
301
|
03
|
300
|
04
|
302
|
05
|
296
|
06
|
294
|
07
|
302
|
08
|
302
|
09
|
301
|
10
|
297
|
Mean
|
299
|
SD
|
3
|
3.1.2 Flexural strength test
Specimen No.
(Unaged)
|
Flexural strength
(MPa)
|
Specimen No.
(Aged)
|
Flexural strength
(MPa)
|
11
|
711
|
21
|
862
|
12
|
790
|
22
|
782
|
13
|
853
|
23
|
741
|
14
|
815
|
24
|
733
|
15
|
813
|
25
|
825
|
16
|
725
|
26
|
808
|
17
|
854
|
27
|
724
|
18
|
756
|
28
|
790
|
19
|
875
|
29
|
776
|
20
|
770
|
30
|
840
|
Mean
|
796
|
Mean
|
788
|
SD
|
53
|
SD
|
44
|
3.1.3 Fracture toughness test
Specimen No.
(Unaged)
|
Fracture toughness
(MPa•m½)
|
Specimen No.
(Aged)
|
Fracture toughness
(MPa•m½)
|
31
|
6.05
|
41
|
6.35
|
32
|
6.40
|
42
|
6.21
|
33
|
6.33
|
43
|
6.29
|
34
|
6.16
|
44
|
6.27
|
35
|
6.19
|
45
|
6.36
|
36
|
6.29
|
46
|
6.12
|
37
|
6.25
|
47
|
6.16
|
38
|
6.18
|
48
|
6.24
|
39
|
6.36
|
49
|
6.26
|
40
|
6.26
|
50
|
6.30
|
Mean
|
6.25
|
Mean
|
6.26
|
SD
|
0.10
|
SD
|
0.07
|
3.1.4 Fatigue strength test
On conditions detailed in Section 2.2.5, both unaged and aged specimens passed the 10 million loading cycles without any failure or intergroup difference either.
3.1.5 Vickers hardness test
Specimen No.
(Unaged)
|
Hardness
(HV10)
|
Specimen No.
(Aged)
|
Hardness
(HV10)
|
61
|
1426
|
66
|
1426
|
62
|
1460
|
67
|
1436
|
63
|
1460
|
68
|
1460
|
64
|
1449
|
69
|
1426
|
65
|
1460
|
70
|
1467
|
Mean
|
1451
|
Mean
|
1443
|
SD
|
13
|
SD
|
17
|
3.1.6 Cytotoxicity test
On conditions detailed in Section 2.2.7, based upon the comparison with the positive, negative and reagent controls, the relative cell proliferation had been investigated and the qualitative evaluation had been carried out as well. Microscopically, in the majority of cells, there was no changes in general morphology, vacuolization, detachment and membrane integrity. Only few cell lysis had been observed. The cytotoxicity scale was consequently scored as 1, mildly cytotoxic, which is totally acceptable for the intended use.
3.1.7 Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay/Ames test (OECD 471)
On conditions detailed in Section 2.2.8, comparing with the reagent controls, the inhibition of 5 types of salmonella typhimurium had not been observed in the test groups with polar or non-polar solvents. And therefore the specimen’s genotoxicity, gene mutations in bacteria, was negative.
3.1.8 TK gene mutation test using mouse lymphoma cells (OECD 476)
On conditions detailed in Section 2.2.9, the reagent controls was used as the baseline, with regard to the mouse lymphoma cells forward mutation, the mutant frequency ratio of the test groups with polar or non-polar solvents and the reagent controls was inferior to 2. And the specimen’s genotoxicity, gene mutations in mammalian cells, was consequently negative.
3.1.9 Mammalian chromosome aberration test (OECD 473)
On conditions detailed in Section 2.2.10, according to the response of reagent controls, regarding the chromosome aberration in CHL cells, there was no statistical difference (p>0.05) between the test groups and the reagent controls. And accordingly, the specimen’s genotoxicity, clastogenicity in mammalian cells, was negative.
3.2 In-vivo experiments
3.2.1 Acute & sub chronic systemic toxicity test
Under the circumstances detailed in Section 2.3.1, regardless of the test groups with polar/non-polar solvents or reagent controls, the clinical observation was all normal for each mouse at the different inspection points. And during the observation period, all the body weights were increased and the mortality was zero. In one word, the specimen’s acute systemic toxicity was negative.
For the subchronic systemic toxicity, in accordance with the reagent controls, in terms of the clinical observation, bodyweight change, hematology, clinical biochemical determination on blood, gross pathology and histopathology, there was no statistical difference (p>0.05) between the test and control groups. As a result of which, the specimen’s subchronic systemic toxicity was negative.
3.2.2 Irritation test
Under the circumstances detailed in Section 2.3.2, irrespective as to whether test groups with polar/non-polar solvents or reagent controls, no any erythema or eschar or oedema occurred, upon which, the specimen’s response to irritation test was negative.
3.2.3 Delayed-type hypersensitivity test
Under the circumstances detailed in Section 2.3.3, regardless of the test groups with polar/non-polar solvents or reagent controls, the clinical observation was all normal for each Hartley albino guinea pig during the observation period. There was no any erythema or oedema observed. Based upon the patch test reactions, according to the Magnusson & Kligman scale, the grading score obtained was less than 1. Consequently, the specimen’s response to delayed-type hypersensitivity test was negative.
3.2.4 Test for local effects after implantation in bone
Under the circumstances detailed in Section 2.3.4, for both the test and control group, there was no abnormal local effects observed through the 26 weeks after the implantation. 1 week after implantation, a few fibrous osteoid callus were similarly observed around the test and control sample. 4 weeks after the implantation, the test and control specimen engaged closely with bone tissue, cell proliferation and trabeculae were observed equally. 26 weeks after the implantation, the new bone formed healthily around the test and control sample, the densified cortical bone were observed, there was no any foreign body reaction. In conclusion, the specimen’s response to local effects after implantation in bone was negative.
3.2.5 Total hip implantation test in pigs
Under the circumstances detailed in Section 2.3.5, comparing with the control group, all the samples in test group were functioning well through the observation period (Figure 7). The blood test results were normal, in terms of the C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, there was no difference between the test and control group. The CT scan results reveal the good outcome (Figure 8). And the pathology examination results were negative. More detailed information could be found in another clinical report.